Search This Blog

Friday, 30 September 2011

Margaret Hodge ,Immigration Lies, Deceit and Hypocrisy

Margaret Hodge (née Oppenheimer): Lies, Deceit and Hypocrisy

Within 24 hours, we have seen the Leader of the Labour Party and the Shadow Home Secretary criticizing the Labour government for its stance on immigration and now… we see none other than multibillionaire Margaret Hodge coming out with guns blazing criticizing Labour’s stance on immigration and taking the clothes of the British National Party. I don’t assume that Margaret Hodge could have said what she is saying now when she campaigned in Barking and Dagenham.

She says now “I think Labour should stop talking numbers. We should set up a system that allows a fairer allocation of limited resources because we have to have some form of rationing. There needs to be a system that gives some recognition to the length of time that someone has lived in the community when it comes to resources such as housing.”

Well, Margaret Hodge, welcome to the British National Party Manifesto. Should we remind Margaret Hodge who were the people that lived in Barking and Dagenham for the longer length of time before her political party opened the floodgates of immigration?

She then somehow contradicts herself and says ‘immigrant numbers are simply a result of globalisation and people will come here, one way or another’. Bitte, Frau Oppenheimer. Das ist nicht richtig! Wir sagen “it is up to the British people to decide who lives in Britain and who doesn’t. Don’t use Globalisation as an excuse to implement your policies of colonisation. It is up to the British people to decide who comes here and who doesn’t.

Has Margaret Hodge also forgotten how she managed to win the 2010 Barking and Dagenham Election? There is a BBC recording where we heard her saying something like ‘if they win, they will carry you on airplanes and throw you into the sea’. I don’t remember any of the so called free media or any member of the so called mainstream political parties or of the so called politically correct society criticizing what she said that in my view is nothing less than gross incitement to violence.

She goes even further and says ‘the amount of support I received from people in my constituency was extraordinary. The amount of open support I received from Westminster was zilch’. Well, what kind of support she was talking about? Did she need any support?

In terms of financial support, I don’t think Margaret Hodge needs any more money than the money she already has. In terms of political support, she had several para-political organizations, including the BBC, working for her. In terms of constituent numbers the woman that said that she didn’t need any white working class had more than enough non-white working class to help her, facilitated by flood immigration that started as soon as the Labour party became government in 1997.

Phoney candidate Margaret Hodge now criticizes both the Labour Party and the Conservative Party saying that they had a phoney war about numbers. She only mentioned housing and she conveniently forgot to mention the Welfare State that is the main attraction for Globalised mass migration.

As Baroness Shreela Flather denounced just a few days ago, immigration is a business for unscrupulous Pakistanis and Bangladeshis and others that use Polygamy as an excuse to milk the welfare state by having several wives claiming benefits and housing as single mothers. We should find out about Barking and Dagenham and about many of Margaret Hodge’s constituents.

I wouldn’t call ethnic cleansing ‘a result fo Globalisation’. I would call it a result of organized crime committed by a Labour government that used the Welfare State for its own political ends. Those who have lived in Britain for longer have been persecuted and called ‘racists, nazis, fascists and bigots’ simply because they have tried to stand up for their own rights.

Labour brought in the so called ‘Positive Discrimination’ and as a consequence of ‘Positive Discrimination’ entire communities have been decimated and more than 80 per cent of all jobs created in Britain in recent years have ended up in foreign hands. So, what? Has Frau Oppenheimer suddenly seen the light?

Stemcor, her family company, was the world’s largest privately owned steel-trading corporation with an annual turnover of £6.28 billion in 2008. When the Labour Party was in the red, she could have lifted the Labour Party out of debt single-handedly and it would have been pocket money for her. Did she? No, she didn’t. She pursued her own interests in ‘business dealings’ in Barking and Dagenham and elsewhere. Eine grosse Scheiße diese Frau ist!

Carlos Cortiglia

The politics of youth

The politics of youth PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Pilgrim

spoiltchild_120_x_225One of many good things about The Bible is the fact that it does not pander to the whims of young people. It is true that The Bible recognises youth as a time of life associated with energy and enthusiasm, but it also recognises a link between youth and immaturity.

You can probably guess where this is leading. One of the big news stories right now is the fact that a schoolboy called Rory Weal has made a speech at the Labour Party conference. His speech was contemptuous of the Conservative-led government, and nationalists can allow themselves the rare indulgence of agreeing with Melanie Phillips.

Rory Weal is a young lad who cannot afford to go to school, although it seems that he can afford to travel to Liverpool for the conference, and that’s no mean journey given that he lives in Kent.

Like many teenage politicians, he obsesses about issues revolving around young people. That is only to be expected, and I was pretty much the same when I first took an interest in politics. However in my own defence I can honestly say that I did occasionally look beyond my own blinkered horizons and consider other people.

He bleats on about the abolition of the Educational Maintenance Allowance. My question to him is that if the EMA is to be brought back, then how should it be funded? Higher taxes are not the answer, as they tend to cause resentment among the people upon whom the higher taxes fall. Bringing the troops home from Afghanistan would save a few billion each year – easily enough to resurrect the EMA – but of course bringing the troops home is not Labour Party policy.

If I were Prime Minister, then I would not hesitate to bring the troops, home, but I would hesitate to spend any of the money saved on handouts to teenagers. That would be way down my list of priorities. Does Rory Weal really believe that his subsidised year twelve is more important than lifting elderly people out of fuel poverty?

I expect a lot of visitors to this site will sympathise with Rory Weal in his desire to improve himself through study, but I cannot bring myself to be enthusiastic. If he is short of money, then has he considered a part time job? When I was a teenager it was common for sixth formers to have Saturday jobs, and that was in a time of high unemployment.

Britain needs talent if it is to succeed in the future, but I wonder to what extent that talent will be nurtured by masses of teenagers studying subjects such as English literature, geography, politics and history – the subjects Weal is taking at AS Level. What career options do these subjects open up for him? Apart from being a researcher for the Labour Party I mean. Okay, geography could lead into a career in town planning, but not every year twelve pupil is going to grow up to become a town planner.

The talent that Britain needs is often not academic. Is A Level politics a good induction to working in a factory? Some of you may be thinking that apprenticeships are a good alternative, and in theory they are. I feel bound to observe, however, that I recently met a young lad who had taken two apprenticeships (in road maintenance and carpentry) but had not sought a career in either of those fields because he said they were boring. I cannot help but wonder if apprenticeships are not wasted on the young. Might it not make more sense to reserve apprenticeships for older people who already have some employment history behind them?

Young people mature and change as they get older, and in many cases this involves them changing their political views. In ten years from now, Rory Weal might be a rising star at Labour Party HQ, or he might be cringing at the recollection of his teenage conference speech. I believe that politicians should seek to reach out to the youth vote, but without pandering to the whims of the more outspoken among them. There are many sixteen year olds in Britain who are not in further education, and who are either in full time work or else looking for full time work. For some reason they tend to receive far less attention from politicians than the likes of Rory Weal. I would be grateful if anyone could explain this.

Tuesday, 27 September 2011

Labour’s Immigration Idiocy to be Laid Bare

Labour’s Immigration Idiocy to be Laid Bare

By Southwest Nationalist.

A previously-hidden collection of five studies on immigration, commissioned by the Labour Party, are finally to see the light of day which will reveal the truth about Britain’s colonisation and the myth of “economic benefits.”

The reports, already leaked to the Telegraph, the snippets which they have published are already a savage indictment of let ‘em all in Labours abject failings on immigration, and raise many questions about why they chose to conceal the truth from us.

Among revelations in the documents aired by the Telegraph, we find the conclusion that immigrants to Britain are more likely to be out of work than the native population, and far less likely to engage in any form of “civic participation”.

Also, more than one third of London’s population has been born outside of the UK. One third of those living in our capital! And the politicians have the gall to tell us that we are not being colonised?

Migrants from Bulgaria and Romania are shown to be more likely to have four or more children – colonisation by the cradle again, placing huge strain on education, NHS, and the welfare state.

As with recent figures which have shown Poland’s population decline whilst the number of Poles in Britain increase, the reports show that the population of both Bulgaria and Romania also declined between 2004 to 2010. Need we tell you that at the same time the number of Bulgarians and Romanians in the UK increased astronomically?

Unsurprisingly, the obvious also happened – unemployment levels in Bulgaria and Romania fell, whereas in the UK they increased. Who could have guessed that is what will happen when you have too many people chasing too few jobs?

On which note, also shown by the reports, is the fact that Bulgarians and Romanians were more likely to claim unemployment benefits than either native Brits or other migrants groups in Britain.

And, what is the best that Labour can manage to say on the issue? Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper admits that Labour “got things wrong” on immigration.

Admitting you “got things wrong” is all fine and dandy, even though it is a huge understatement and does absolutely nothing to repair the damage which has been done to Britain.

Saying you should have done it differently, great help to us.

What are the Labour party going to do in order to undo and reverse the nightmare of mass immigration and overpopulation, along with the burdens that places on all of our critical services and national infrastructure?

Nothing, that’s what. You got it wrong, and we’re expected to live with it for ever more.

Many believe that Labour didn’t get it wrong by accident, there was design there. Whatever the truth, the Labour legacy is an overcrowded nation flooded with immigrants, and it is a legacy which – despite Cameron’s tough talking – ConDem has carried on.

Getting it wrong just doesn’t cut it one bit, politicians seem to get it wrong all too often, and it is always us and Britain left paying the price.

Instead of just holding up hands with a weak “we got it wrong” and not even the decency to offer a true apology, how about admitting to the full extent of just how you got it wrong, the damage which that has caused, and then actually doing something that will put it right for once?

No, of course not, your wrongs are something the rest of us will be paying the price of for a long time, and you’ll just expect us to lump it and accept a half hearted semi apology in the way of penitence.

Our society has been changed forever as a result of your getting it wrong, and the process of change is ongoing – and it isn’t change for the better.

Labour was, and is, a disaster for Britain – and sadly, as we are finding out currently, Tory and Liberal are no better.

Not only have all of them got it wrong, they all continue to get it wrong. We can see with our own eyes that Britain and Britain’s future is not safe in any of their hands.

Whichever of them is in power Britain will continues its journey towards overpopulated and colonised land, and by way of an excuse we’ll get no more than a “we got things wrong” from the lot of them.

Many times we don’t even get that feeble excuse though, normally it’s point at one of the other parties and tell us that “they got it wrong”.

As they make excuses and trade blame, and do nothing in the way of fixing things, the colonisation of our Britain continues.

Monday, 26 September 2011

British Taxpayers Give £1.4 Billion in Foreign Aid to Pakistan—While Americans Warn of Terror Threat

British Taxpayers Give £1.4 Billion in Foreign Aid to Pakistan—While Americans Warn of Terror Threat

British taxpayers will give £1.392 billion in foreign aid to Pakistan, a nation accused today of “exporting violence” to Afghanistan by a top US military officer.

The foreign aid spend, announced in a sheet issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) and obtainable from its website here, includes £147,500,000 for “wealth creation,” £202,000,000 for “governance and security,” £645,000,000 for “education”, £200,500,00 for “reproductive, maternal and newborn health,” “£108,500,000 for “pervert, hunger and vulnerability,” and a further £88,000,00 for “humanitarian” aid.

The £1.4 billion total, to be paid over before the end of 2015, is the same amount that Pakistan has put aside to buy a new fleet of Chinese made submarines. It will also allow Pakistan to proceed with its purchase of two squadrons of Chinese J-10 fighters for $1.4 billion (£900,000,000).

The US military’s Admiral Mike Mullen told a congressional subcommittee today that the Pakistani government actively supported the Islamist “Haqqani” network and other al Qaida-aligned groups.”

He said Pakistan’s government has chosen to “use violent extremism as an instrument of policy,” adding that “by exporting violence, they have eroded their internal security and their position in the region. They have undermined their international credibility and threatened their economic well-being”.

The UK foreign aid spend has risen by 50 per cent under the coalition government, and now costs every household in Britain £479 extra tax per year.

In 2008, then prime minister Gordon Brown revealed that three quarters of all terrorist plots investigated in the U.K. were linked to Pakistan-based Muslims, and gave offered £6 million to help Pakistan “tackle the causes of radicalisation.”

He also pledged help for Pakistan’s bomb-disposal teams, forensic investigators and airport security. “Three quarters of the most serious plots investigated by the British authorities have links to al-Qaeda in Pakistan,” he said.

* A report on the BBC website today said that a south London mosque is at the centre of allegations it helped promote of acts of terror and hate in Pakistan.

“Leaflets circulating in Pakistan calling for the murder of members of the Ahmadi Muslim sect directed readers to a website naming Stockwell Mosque,” the BBC said.

“The website mentioned on the leaflets in turn advised people with queries to contact the mosque in Stockwell.”

Prominent Pakistani Supreme Court Lawyer Muji ur Rehman was quoted by the BBC as saying that Muslims are “carrying fundamentalist ideology from here (London) back to Pakistan, when instead we would expect them to come with their liberalism instead.”

Sunday, 25 September 2011

EDL Coming down the road , Bolton Chapter

EDL Coming down the road PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow

EDL-CMD_140_x_203There is a fairly new publishing company called VHC Publishing that promotes the work of new writers. Well Nationalist4UK thought (quite correctly) that we might be interested in their review of one of the new books they have added to their cataloque.

Below is a sample of the work of the author of EDL Coming down the road, Billy Blake who has charted the rise and progress of the EDL over the last two years.

UAF cheered wildly as the EDL seemingly retreated. Anti-fascists started chanting “No Pasaran!” They had defeated the Nazis! They were jubilant, celebrating victory and started singing “We shall not be moved!”

However, their joy proved somewhat premature, chants of “Muslim bombers off our streets!” could suddenly be heard getting gradually louder. The EDL in the square had merely gone to meet a snaking mass of their comrades who, with a police escort, slowly making their way there. They had been led slowly through the streets of Bolton towards the protest site, a line of stewards and riot police checking their advance.
The column stalled briefly before being allowed to enter the square and the chant of “E, E, EDL!” filled the air.

Finally released by police, the EDL roared like a triumphant army as they entered the arena. The anti-fascists were dumbstruck, as an immense, noisy, flag waving, swarming mass of patriots flooded towards them.

These were the forgotten people, the sons and daughters of old England, here to reclaim their birthright. A mass of coloured flags filled the square, as it was reclaimed in the name of the English people. Here were the descendants of people who built the modern world, their battle flag rich with exotic names from far flung shores. Now more familiar sounding names were being added, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, London and now Bolton. There were well over 1500 of them, all chanting in unison and drowning out the chants of the anti-fascists. It was pure, crude and brutal Anglo-Saxon defiance. They had a simple message for their opponents, two fingers. We will not submit.

The entrance alone was a victory in itself, the surprise of anti-fascists was palpable. They had severely misjudged the EDL’s level of support. As they confronted the anti-fascists the EDL mocked them with chants of “who are ya, who are ya?” Bolton’s war memorial stood proudly between the two groups, bearing the legend ‘Tell ye your children’.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn: A Hero of Christianity and Nationalism

Alexander Solzhenitsyn: A Hero of Christianity and Nationalism
Written by Tim Heydon
September 2011

Only once has your writer got a lump in the throat when reading a tribute to the dead in the Daily Mail.

That was Stephen Glover’s article on Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, the great Russian writer and author of ‘One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch’, ‘Cancer Ward’ ‘The Gulag Archipelago’ and many other famous books about life under left-fascist totalitarianism, on the occasion of the latter’s death.

‘A literary giant whose courage put today's pygmy authors to shame’

...Under the heading, ‘A literary giant whose courage put today's pygmy authors to shame’ Glover recounted the life of a man who, strengthened by the Christian faith he had once abandoned in favour of Marxism, had lived a life of unimaginable hardship and had struggled against the evil of Lenin and Stalin with inspirational courage. As Glover remarked,

‘Most of us, if forced to spend eight years doing hard labour, would curl up, and very possibly die. We certainly wouldn't write a novel on scraps of paper and memorise them. Once released, we would probably crawl away into the obscurity of a quiet life rather than defy the Soviet authorities.

That Solzhenitsyn did not do this owed a great deal to his character, as well as to his high abilities as an artist. But his imperative to write also sprang from a powerful belief - not only in himself, though that was important, but also in the values of human dignity in which he had been educated as a child; Christian values which were in danger of being extirpated by Soviet communism, and which he wished to defend, despite being, as it must then have seemed to him, almost alone’.

Glover ended with these words:-

‘Of course, he did not overthrow Soviet communism, but he kept alive the hopes of many of his fellow countrymen, and he illuminated in the West the true horrors of Stalin and Lenin when they were still being celebrated by those whom Stalin himself had described derisively as 'useful idiots’.

‘And, in a country where tens of thousands of Christians were persecuted and murdered, Alexander Solzhenitsyn was yesterday laid to rest in Moscow's Donskoi cathedral, a wooden cross on his chest as he lay in his coffin. For a man who started his life as a Christian, and who endured the horrors of Stalin's Russia, this was surely the ultimate victory’.

Solzhenitsyn’s Struggle resonates with ours today

We are not at the stage when those dissenting from the approved marxist political stance – ie political correctness – can be sent by the authorities to labour camps of the Soviet type in the hope that either their harshness will finish either us off or will break our spirit. British attitudes still retain too much Christian heritage for that. Nevertheless, Christianity is persecuted here and political non-conformity is punished in all manner of ways.

In Secular Semi-Marxist Britain, as in the Soviet Union, ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ are whatever the Political Class say they are

There is every prospect that this persecution will worsen in time, as persecution tends to when, as in the atheistical Soviet Union, morality is not relativised as atheism logically demands but held to be an absolute when dictated by the state. In the USSR, so too in our country, the ‘right’ has become whatever the culturally marxist political class says it is and the ‘wrong’ has become whatever it disapproves of.

Solzhenitsyn : Christian and Ethnic Nationalist - Can’t have that!

Solzhenitsysn has faded somewhat from the public consciousness. Why is that? It is not because he wrote about a particular period in a ‘far away country’. As he showed so brilliantly, universal themes can be illuminated by the particular.

No, there is a more important reason than that. It is not just that the foundation of Solzhenitsyn’s antipathy to Marxism / Communism and the source of his courage in opposing it was his personal experience and the Christianity which it brought him back to, although there is that too, but that his view of Russia’s future was as part of a pan-slavic world founded on Orthodox Christianity. ‘Pan-slavic nonsense’ as Glover calls it in his otherwise admirable Daily Mail piece.

There has never been a culture of note that was not founded by a people on its religion.

There has never been a culture of note that was not founded by a people on its religion. This does not exclude Confucian China and the USA. Confucianism is the working out in moral terms of the implications of ancestor worship and the USA, regardless of the Declaration of Independence and its Constitution, was founded by Europeans and based from the first on Protestant Christianity. So why does Glover call Solzhenitsyn’s views ‘nonsense’? He doesn’t tell us, as if it were self-evident.

Solzhenitsyn and the Russian Orthodox Church

As it happens, Solzhenitysn’s opinions chime with those of the Russian Orthodox Church at least as far as it justifies ethnic preference. Here are ‘The Bases of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church’ which at the least underline the importance and rightness of ethnicity in Christian patriotism. The statement rightly points out the dangers of extreme national feeling, but continues:-

‘II. 2. …‘the Church unites in herself the universal with the national’ (as did Jesus himself, whose teaching pointed to the universal, but who) ‘identified Himself with the people to whom He belonged by birth’.

II. 3. Christian patriotism may be expressed at the same time with regard to a nation as an ethnic community and as a community of its citizens. The Orthodox Christian is called to love his fatherland, which has a territorial dimension, and his brothers by blood who live everywhere in the world’

Solzhenitsyn and Two Strands of Thought sneered at by Western Liberals

Thus Solzehnitsyn incorporated two strands sneered at and condemned by the western ‘liberal intelligentsia’ who have of course a stranglehold on the public expression of opinion in our ‘free society’: Christianity and ethnic patriotism. These people, who are half-way through the journey to a Soviet system but who seem to be unaware of the fact or actually to welcome it, have not of course experienced the full flavour of a world dedicated to equality as Solzhenitsyn had done. Nevertheless they seem to think they know more about it than he did.
(The tone of left-liberalism’s attitude to Solzhenitsyn is encapsulated in a piece of 4th August 2008 written by William Harrison for ‘The Guardian’.

Politically Incorrect Solzhenitsyn is being replaced as the Voice of Soviet Literature by Vasily Grossman who ticks more PC Boxes

Compare Solzhenitsin’s current reputation in the West with for example, the ecstatic reception given by Tim Martin in The Daily Telegraph Review section of 17th September 2011 to the Radio 4 production of ‘Life and Fate’, a ‘lost masterpiece’ as it was described there. Is it entirely a coincidence that this novel was written by a Soviet Jew, Vasily Grossman; that as well as the Soviets in WW11 and the Siege of Stalingrad it concerns the Holocaust and Soviet anti-semitism and that this production was commissioned by the Gramsci soldier and son of Polish Jewish immigrants, Mark Damazer when he was still at the BBC?

Tim Martin tells us, ‘The BBC adaption will no doubt build on Grossman’s growing fan base in the English-speaking world, where as Robert Chandler puts it. ‘we seem to have this need for there to be a one-and –only figure of Soviet Literature. It used to be Solzhenitsyn and now it seems to be becoming Grossman.’ Well, Grossman certainly ticks a lot of politically correct boxes and has powerful friends like Damazer, so ‘no surprise there, then’.

Going on about the Holocaust and Missing the Point

In this week’s Spectator magazine, Tanya Gold says, ‘A friend has asked me. ‘What is it about the Jews and the Holocaust? Why do you go on about it?’ She answered, ‘’For the dead you fool.’’

Gold has rather missed the point. It is not really that the Jews go on about their undoubtedly terrible sufferings in honour of their dead. It is that they mostly go on about it as if no one else had suffered, or as much. This is not a position likely to endear them to the Russians for example (20 millions war dead alone, excluding those many, many millions who died in the Gulags, as a result of forced starvations, deportations etc etc. (60 millions in total according to Solzhenitsyn). This apparent focus on their own sufferings to the exclusion of all else does unfortunately rather tend to reinforce anti-semitic opinions.

Are the Chattering Classes beginning to get fed up with Jewish Self-Obsession as well?

The never-ending flow of demonstrations of Jewish self-obsession and the acquiescent non-Jewish assumption that anything written by an oppressed Jew must necessarily be a superior piece does now though seem to be exasperating even people in the chattering classes. Here is Rupert Christiansen’s take on the play ’The ‘Passenger’ in the London’s West End,‘ (Daily Telegraph, 21st September 2011):

‘The press has recently been full of fascinating articles about a Polish-Jewish composer who suffered under Stalin and died virtually forgotten in 1996. But after hearing two of Mieczyslaw Weinberg;s operas ‘The Portrait’ and now his so-called masterpiece ‘The Passenger’, I have lost interest…. ‘

Solzhenitsyn’s experience of the West led him to reject it and to seek a ‘Third Way’

D G Rowling puts his finger on why Solzhenitsyn was confirmed in his pan- slavism through his exile in the West . He writes :-

It was Solzhenitsyn’s published writings after his expulsion to the West that dramatically drew Western attention to the revival of Russian national consciousness.

His surprising attack on Marxism as a Western ideology, his antipathy to the materialism, individualism and atheism that he saw at the heart of Western Civilisation and his call for a regeneration of traditional Russian values quickly earned Solzhenitsin the epithet ‘Russian nationalist’.

After having the leisure to inspect the state of decay of Western civilisation, during his exile in the USA, who can blame Solzhenitsin for seeking the salvation of Russia in its ethnic religious and cultural roots rather than in Western Liberalism?

And can there be much doubt that if Solzhenitsyn had in Britain expressed his view about the desirability of a Christian, ethnic state here with the same forcefulness and courage he exhibited all his life, sooner or later he would have run into trouble with the authorities here?

Saturday, 24 September 2011

A Pecking Order of Equalities

A Pecking Order of Equalities

By Southwest Nationalist.

In the wake of several television presenters losing their jobs for making sexist remarks, the Mail recently ran a story entitled “So why is it all right for women to be sexist about MEN?”

The Mail’s story doesn’t really need rehashing here, the title says all that is currently needed, but it tells only a part of the story.

There’s a distinct pecking order in existence within the world of rights and equalities as a whole, which creates a society in which speech is most definitely not free or equal.

From the top of my head, and I bet if you watch a few hours TV, or read a few newspapers, you could see every single one in action.

- Women over Men;

- Gay/Lesbian/etc over Straight;

- Muslim over Christian;

- Non-white over White.

Countless court cases confirm the adherence to this slanted code of inequality, television screams it in our faces every day. Equality creates a pecking order in which equality does not exist because equality is judged differently for the various sections of society.

It’s also, of course, filled with complications. A white woman could say what she likes about straight white men, but her ‘rights’ will likely lose out should she make similar remarks about gay men or minority men, whereas a Muslim man can express views about gays that would see most people arrested.

And, heaven help the white, straight Christian who attacks Islam’s stance on homosexuality!

So long as you’ve got your foot squarely in one of the minority camps then at least you’re on top of another group, there’s someone that you can mock until your heart’s content.

But, woe betide the white, Christian, straight male, who is at the very bottom of the pecking order, with a voice that is expected to do nothing more than agree with every other group lest he be accused of some kind of ism/obia/hate.

Belonging to one of these protected groups – or more, preferably more, you want as many ticks in those boxes as you can get – could be seen as something that society rewards, a way of getting ahead. You win more rights and freedoms by joining the ranks of the oppressed minority after all.

The rotten truth about all these so called rights and equalities is that they are nothing of the sort, they are just a state imposed hierarchy which is plastered in the gaudy robes of equality. Injustice and inequality are celebrated, sanctioned, and given official endorsement.

Despite all the lofty rhetoric from the political correct devotees, equality is simply a political decision as to who will bear the inequality and who will be more equal.

Its crowning achievement is to create a system of legally sanctioned social and intellectual apartheid, where inequality and oppression are more rampant than ever.

Tommy Robinson's Video Diary Comments for September 2011


Monday, 19 September 2011

It’s not racist when they say it

It’s not racist when they say it PDF Print E-mail
Written by The Pilgrim

racistsign_160_x_214The Bible condemns hypocrisy. In fact the words hypocrite and hypocrisy occur fourteen times in Matthew’s Gospel alone. Sadly though, the message does not always get through to our enemies.

Take the Stalinist trade unions for example. It has just been announced that Britain’s first free school for Muslims has been approved. Free schools are state-funded schools which are exempt from the national curriculum and also free from local authority interference. They are not permitted to be exclusive – except regarding gender - but may select up to fifty percent of pupils on such grounds as religious affiliation.

While there is doubtless a lot to be said for the idea of free schools, this particular free school has caused some controversy. Simon Jones, national executive member for the anti-British National Union of Teachers, has been quoted as saying: “It will further undermine much of the progress towards community cohesion. We are on our way to a completely segregated schooling system. It is going to develop potential social problems in the future.

A similar view has been expressed by Councillor David Foster, the leader of the Liberal Democrats in that borough and a Methodist local preacher: “In my view we shouldn't have any religious schools of any faith. One of the problems in Blackburn is the segregation of communities.

Of course these views are not racist, because they were not made by patriots. I am sure that readers of this site will appreciate that subtlety. While I am not opposed to Muslims being taught apart from British children, I would prefer it if they were taught in a non-Muslim school. There have been instances in recent years of British teenagers being bullied by Muslim teenagers in non-segregated schools, made worse in many cases by a failure of the school staff to take appropriate action.

Nevertheless, allowing Muslims to have their own school is not necessarily a step in the right direction. Such a school will be only as good as what is taught there. For example, will pupils be given lessons in how to avoid prosecution for homicide? Or perhaps they will be given lessons in how to avoid being prosecuted for rape? One thing I am confident about is that this school will become a Muslim ghetto. It will not be allowed to exclude non-Muslim boys, but can you see any non-Muslim families trying to get their sons into such a school? Would you?

A related news item is that the noted Jewish scientist Lord Winston has spoken out about the dangers posed by immigrants in the NHS. He claims that he is not racist for speaking out, and of course we all agree. As a supporter of the Labour Party, he cannot be a racist, can he? Of course if either Andrew Brons or Richard Barnbrook had dared to say the same thing (and they may have done) then it would either be not reported in the press, or else reported in a negative light.

While we can admire Lord Winston for highlighting the problem, we cannot commend his failure to address the root cause of the problem. He maintains that “the solution ultimately is to negotiate better with Europe”. He is wrong. The solution ultimately is to tell the EU to stuff itself, and then jail the traitorous politicians who surrendered our sovereignty.

Saturday, 17 September 2011

Sunday 18th September - The Lawful Bank on VBR

Sunday 18th September - The Lawful Bank PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow


Right you have another chance to listen to the speech by Roger Hayes giving details of how the Lawful Bank will work, which will be played in the British Resistance Paltalk room this Sunday at 8 p.m.

You will also learn from people who have already signed up with the new bank just what you get in your Welcome Pack.

Last time the turn out to listen to this revolutionary concept was disappointing. Let us see how many of you turn up this time.

Babies, Benefits and Third World Colonisation

Babies, Benefits and Colonisation

By Southwest Nationalist.

Well, it took someone born in Lahore to say it – probably the only way to escape the accusations of racism that would pour in thick and fast if anyone else spoke out – but Baroness Shreela Flather has stated a truth that we’ve all known, and many of us have warned about, for years.

Some foreigners – and she singles out Pakistanis and Bangladeshis – are having more children because it brings them benefits and a bigger house.

“The minority communities in this country, particularly the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis, have a very large number of children and the attraction is the large number of benefits that follow the child….Nobody likes to accept that, nobody likes to talk about it because it is supposed to be very politically incorrect”.

Just one rephrase, nobody is allowed to talk about that, cries of racism are what would greet our words. It’s not that people don’t like to, it’s that the PC system has stifled all debate.

You’ll put them in a tricky position though, a peer born in Lahore mentioning Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. They’ll probably just bury it without a mention, the racism card would be a tough one to play.

Many of us have been saying it for years though, we have seen huge families subsidised by the British taxpayer, watched as in effect we pay for our own colonisation.

The perfect system was created for immigrants to have children like it was going out of fashion, where they would be rewarded for this, and by God have many taken advantage of Britain’s stupidity.

It is by no coincidence that we see birth rates falling among the indigenous, yet going through the roof for certain minority groups – we’ve handed them every incentive.

Britain has, quite simply, encouraged peoples from the world over to settle here, and once here has given them every encouragement to raise huge families.

We hand reward after reward to our colonisers, and we are forbidden from saying a thing about it because to do so would be racist.

As for doing anything about it, well, racist too, there’s the EHRC and human rights waiting in the wings.

Who can really blame the immigrants, it is the idiocy of those who subverted the system into a politically correct monolith pandering to every minority need which has led us to here.

A moronic system which functions to impose diversity and the decline of the indigenous, that’s exactly what we have in the UK.

Thinking that foreign cultures would suddenly adapt to British ways and have miniscule families, especially when there are financial incentives to breed like rabbits, is symptomatic of the ludicrous idea of integration which has been foisted on us.

It is not by accident that the system was created whereby we were forced to allow millions into Britain, and then we handed them every incentive to raise huge families, it was a deliberate move and part of the attempts to create a multicultural society.

We witnessed a perfect storm of immigration, encouragement to immigrants to have large families, and it being taboo for the British people to speak of it.

Those conditions did not occur by accident, nor do they remain in place by accident.

Benefits and babies are another arm in the colonisation of the UK, we’re paying the costs incurred along the way to our own demise as a people.

Thursday, 15 September 2011

The Muslim-British Race War – Encouraged by the British State

The Muslim-British Race War – Encouraged by the State PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mister Fox

Islamic  woman protester with black flag

The British authorities are in league with Muslims against their own people.

The constant appeasement of Muslims encourages them to do what they like. Birmingham police and Broad Street Marshalls allow Muslim taxi drivers to park in bus lanes, block double-yellow lines, make three-point turns and U turns in the middle of busy and over the central reservations on Broad Street with impunity. Members of the public constantly complain but the police ignore law abiding citizens and cover-up for Muslim law breakers.

They do not just keep small things like that from the public: they suppress serious activities like the news of terrorist training camps near Birmingham. The editors of the Birmingham's three local papers also kept it from the public.

In Birmingham and London trainees learnt hand-to-hand combat and survival skills. For further training they were sent for military training in Yemen and Afghanistan. After the London bombings, The Times reported that “a dozen members” of British Muslim group Al-Muhajiroun “have taken part in suicide bombings or have become close to Al-Qaeda and its support network.”

In January 2007 the group's leader Omar Bakri revealed that Islamist extremists were infiltrating the police and other public sector organisations. The Daily Mail exposed eight members of al-Qaeda in the police.

RAF Nimrod planes have picked-up Birmingham accents in Afghanistan and Taliban fighters. One Taliban fighter had an Aston Villa tattoo. (1) There is no excuse for the political, academic and media elites allowing a race war to develop in Britain.

As far back as 4 May 2003, The Sunday Telegraph’s Alasdair Palmer wrote: “Britain has become the headquarters of choice for extremist Islamic preachers, who now have a network of organisations dedicated to sowing pure hatred: hatred of the West, of democracy, and of the values of tolerance and freedom — the very values that give them the freedom to operate here: ‘Your task against the infidel,’ says one video, ‘is to kill their children, take their women, destroy their homes.’”

What is behind the security services allowing Muslim extremists to weapon train and develop networks here? Here is a clue: former Italian President Francesco Cossiga admitted in the Italian paper Corriere della Sera in 2008, that in the 1970s, the Italian government allowed Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks.

The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a “secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organisations, including terrorist groups. Moro designed the terms of the agreement with Arab terrorists, Cossiga said. “The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organisations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were ‘handled’ by the secret services.”

The security services have operated a similar deal in Britain. On 22 August 1998, the newspaper Al Sharq Al Awsat quoted Omar Bakri: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got Asylum.”

This covenant allowed Muslim extremists to plan attacks abroad and develop terror networks here. In 1999 it was reported that each year approximately 2,000 Muslims were trained about Holy War at camps in Britain run by Al-Muhajiroun. The police, security services and the Home Secretary Theresa May are still operating this Covenant with Muslim extremists and potential terrorists as we will see towards the end of this essay when we look at the recent ceremony for the victims of 9/11 outside the American Embassy in Grosvenor Square.

In Blackpool the police refuse to warn parents about Muslims who groom and rape their daughters so parents are unable to protect their daughters. Everywhere you look in small things as well as large, you see the police and other authorities siding with Muslims against the British people. The evils and injustices done to innocent British people by our rulers are some of the worst inhuman history yet they blame us if anything goes wrong because they will not accept responsibility themselves. (2)

Even during growing and obvious hostility between Muslims and Britons the Government imports more Muslims to augment their street armies: U.K. Muslim Population Grows 10 Times Faster Than the Rest of the Nation. The Muslim population in the U.K. has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in four short years. Muslims multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of the Nation, the research by the Office for National Statistics reveals. These figures were up to 2008 so I suspect in 2011 you could almost double this. Here is some figures from 20045 The total number of Muslims in Great Britain: 2004: 1,087,000 2005: 2,017,000

A ludicrous aspect is that we have our money misappropriated to pay for our own destruction. On 12th September The Telegraph reported:

“The “coping classes” increasingly are struggling with the responsibility of looking after two generations, the equality watchdog says.

This is in a 700-page report that forms the first comprehensive survey of disadvantage and discrimination across Britain. “While the country today is more tolerant than in 1970, society is still not fair for many people, it says. The economic crisis and the Government’s proposed spending cuts threaten to make inequality worse, it says. The report, How Fair is Britain?
Unemployment among ethnic minorities costs the economy almost £8.6 billion a year in benefits and lost revenue from taxes. Half of Muslim men and three quarters of Muslim women are unemployed.

The country has a strong sense of tolerance and fair play. However, racism and religious prejudice are increasing, while hostility towards immigration has grown.”

That is a clear statement of official bias in favour of Muslims. You see the Elites have brought this situation about but rather than face their own culpability use the connative term “racism” and “religious prejudice” which only apply to Whites to make us scapegoats. Are they saying invading Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq is not religious prejudice and racism?

On 7 July 2005 52 victims of Third World immigration were blown up in London. There have been other outrages since, like the one on 29 June 2007, in London when two carbombs were planted but disabled before they could be detonated. The first was left near the Tiger Tiger nightclub in Haymarket at about 1:30 am. and another in nearby Cockspur Street.

The first was reported to the police by an ambulance crew attending an incident at Tiger Tiger when they noticed suspicious fumes; around an hour later, the second was found when the car was given a ticket for parking, and then an hour later, transported to the car pound at Park Lane where staff smelt a strong smell of petrol. When they heard about the first bomb attempt they reported the vehicle to police. A link established to the attempt at Glasgow International Airport. Bilal Abdullah was arrested and sentenced to 32 years in prison for conspiracy to commit murder in both incidents. The important point is they should not be here to murder and maim us as we should not be invading their countries for the now. There was an attempt to behead a Muslim soldier for serving in the British army.

The Sunday Times of June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire.

He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “Barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years.
Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation”. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight.

Enoch told Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971: “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”

These Muslims are right in their grouse that our corrupt leaders are waging a war against their homelands and people; but we are right in our grouse that they are importing Muslims into our homelands to destroy our way of life, our countries and us as a people. It will take proper international organisation one day to return them to their homelands, and for us to stop bombing them in theirs. For Cameron to send the RAF out to bomb Arab civilians including women and children is despicable; but to invite aggrieved Muslims from these countries when they are full of hatred for us is sick. We must make it clear to Muslims that we mean them no harm it is our now rulers who are waging war on them but we can not co-exist together in the our countries.

A memorial service for the 67 British victims of the 9/11 terror attack was held in the US Embassy gardens with the families of the victims. It was televised and when it began there was loud shouting through megaphones from the Muslims Against Crusades who the police had allowed to disrupt the ceremony and it was clearly heard by the guests and broadcast to the world. The US flag was burnt in “honour" of the "Martyrs of 9/11" across the road from the American Embassy while the political police stood watching.

Some of the drips in attendance were: Prince Charles and Camilla, David Cameron, the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, Labour leader Ed Miliband, U.S. ambassador to the UK Louis Susman and London mayor Boris Johnson and his wife who were attacked by Muslims on their way to the ceremony. The chants which were clear to these appeasers will not make an impression on their minds as they are living in a fantasy: Prince Charles will continue promoting Muslim causes including saying that the world needs to follow Islam for peace and Cameron will make no attempt to stop immigration even if the EU would let him which they will not. Western elites have brought race war into our countries and bear the responsibility and the guilt. (3)
These promoters of the idea that Islam is a religion of peace stood and listened as the two-minute silence was disrupted by Muslim protesters chanting and waving placards as well as burning the flag. Tellingly, the police moved on a group of English Defence League protesters, who had gathered to oppose the demonstration, to make way for the MAC supporters. Then the political police stood and watched as the American flag was burned. Once again we have been humiliated in front of the world.

The EDL attempt to prevent this insult to American and British victims of 9/11 was prevented by the police and resulted in two good members being stabbed, running battles on Oxford Street, Hyde Park-Speakers Corner, Edgeware Road, and around the American Embassy.

A disgusting senior police officer read the riot Act to decent British people then allowed Muslims to humiliate us in front of the world. I have more respect for malaria than that four-eyed tit. It is time to withhold the portion of council tax that funds this police oppression of legitimate British activities like paying respects to the dead of 9/11.(4) It is clear that the police are being used against us, and it is disappointing that they obey these orders.

The police moved the EDL along so the Muslims could protest and burn the American flag. But even more sinister, Home Secretary Theresa May who allowed the Muslims to protest against the ceremony routinely bans EDL protests against Muslim extremists. So Theresa May you encourage Muslim extremism on our streets? They were wearing war clothing but you know that don't you?

The government are culpable because they have regular security briefings from the Security Services, MI5, MI6 and Special Branch so they knowingly allowed Muslim extremists to humiliate us and insult our American allies. The police favourtism to Muslim extremists and oppression of honourable British people trying to pay their respects to the victims of 9/11 would have been on Home Office instructions through briefings

There were two EDL supporters stabbed later by Muslim extremists but the media routinely suppress that sort of thing. We must pretend how wonderful and successful multi-racialism is. In July 2010, totalitarian MP for Stourbridge Margot James urged Home Office ministers Nick Herbert MP (police) and James Brokenshire MP (crime prevention) to strengthen the law giving police powers to ban rallies likely to pose a risk to public order. She was referring to EDL demos not Notting Hill Carnival or Muslim demos.

The Muslim demonstraters wore terrorists headgear and brandished the Muslim black flag of war. These were street soldiers, a war party, and the police took their side against honourable British people.

The media are also withholding news of EDL leader Tommy Robinson's hunger strike in Bedford prison. (5)The prison where John Bunyan languished 350 years ago. These corrupt and inadequate fools we have running this Britain have turned this country into a third-world shithole and, even worse, in many areas a warzone. Welcome to Enoch's racial civil war courtesy of our New World Order Western elites.


Click here for the reference notes relating to this article

"New World Order" researcher Alan Watt discusses the history of social engineering from the early twentieth century

"New World Order" researcher Alan Watt discusses the history of social engineering from the early twentieth century up to today, and how the wealthy elites who fund these projects are creating a dysfunctional society in order to lower the birth rate, destroy the nuclear family unit, and consolidate their power in a global government system unanswerable to the general population.

UK and EUTaxpayers Might Have To Bail Out European Central Bank, Andrew Brons Warns

EU Taxpayers Might Have To Bail Out European Central Bank, Andrew Brons Warns

Taxpayers across the European Union might be forced to bail out the European Central Bank (ECB) if that body proceeds with its plans to buy Spanish and Italian government bonds, Andrew Brons MEP has warned.

Speaking during a European Parliamentary debate on the economic crisis in the eurozone, Mr Brons said that a common interest rate “cannot be appropriate for economies in very different states of health.

“Interest rates are too high for Southern European countries that are in recession, because they have been raised to curb inflationary pressures in Germany,” Mr Brons said.

“This has exacerbated the recession, which has led to falling government revenues and increased government debt.

“Furthermore, the percentage return (or ‘coupon’) on sovereign bonds has had to be higher because of diminished confidence and fear of default.

“The ECB was already buying small countries’ sovereign debt and has recently started to buy Spanish and Italian bonds to instil confidence.

“Whilst this might postpone any crisis, there is a real danger that the ECB will purchase bonds the market value of which will eventually fall, as has already occurred with bonds issued by Greece Ireland and Portugal.

“Even an institution as well funded as the ECB cannot survive a massive fall in the assets of its balance sheet, without a huge re-capitalisation by the taxpayers of the Euro-zone and possibly from outside the Euro-zone,” Mr Brons warned.

* On 12 September, the ECB announced that it had purchased €14 billion of Italian and Spanish government bonds during the previous week. The announcement provoked the resignation of the German representative on the ECB’s Executive Board, Jürgen Stark.

Mr Stark’s resignation was followed by a speech by German Bundesbank president Jens Weidmann who said that the ECB had “burdened itself with considerable risks” after buying the Italian and Spanish bonds.

So far, the ECB has purchased €143 billion worth of sovereign bonds from crisis-ridden countries, placing its shareholders at a huge risk should those nations default (which appears increasingly likely to happen).


Wednesday, 14 September 2011

The secret immigration policy the Politicians tried to hide

The secret immigration policy they tried to hide

By Linda Kaucher

While political reporters for the most part ignore the EU, British domestic policy is actually formulated to fit not just with internal EU directives, but, importantly, with the EU's external international trade agenda.

This broader policy affects people's lives here, particularly their employment and that of their children and grandchildren in the future. Yet information on this broader picture, the parts of EU trade policy that will affect people most, is kept from them.

A very relevant and major feature of EU trade policy is the concession that allows transnational corporations to bring workers into the EU. In tradespeak this is called 'Mode 4'.

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) defines four modes for cross-border trade in services: via internet (Mode 1); where the customer crosses borders e.g. tourism and the international student market (Mode 2); where a company establishes in another country (Mode 3); and by moving workers across borders (Mode 4).

Moving workers from a lower to a higher socio-economic country is a very profitable business for the transnational corporations that are in a position to benefit, on a par with moving production and service work to cheaper labour areas of the world.

With the WTO Doha deal apparently abandoned, the EU has been negotiating a set of bilateral and regional trade deals with much of the world. These deals are more secretive than WTO negotiations, with the contents of negotiations kept private until those negotiations are completed.

But investigative work has revealed the urgency of the situation.

The EU is including Mode 4 concessions in all of the deals it is currently negotiating. In fact Mode 4 is the carrot, to obtain, in exchange, investment opportunity access into trading partner countries for transnational financial services corporations, which are for the most part based in London.

Actually these corporations benefit from both sides of the deals. They get the investment opportunities but also cheap labour brought in, and, as this 'reserve army of labour' undermines the power of organised labour, strengthening the power of capital in its balance of power with labour.

Although these are EU deals, the UK is the main and willing target for the Mode 4 concessions. Thus it is UK workers who will pay the price.

A very important trade deal in this regard is the EU/India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that has been under negotiation for four years. It has been discovered that Mode 4 concessions are the one thing that the Indian government is demanding. In addition, leaked documentation shows that the liberalised UK will be taking the bulk of the EU's Mode 4 commitment.

In fact Trade Commission staff have admitted that the EU/India FTA is, in effect , 85% a UK deal. That's the percentage of the gains which will accrue to the UK (well, the international financial firms based in London, anyway) while the UK (UK workers, this time) will get that percentage of the pain.

Financial services investment opportunities overseas will not produce jobs here. But workers will be displaced via Mode 4, especially in a time of cuts. Transnational firms will be able to offer cheap onshore outsourcing, using cheaper temporary migrant labour and will also be able to supply labour into other firms allowing them to offload all employer responsibilities.

Within the supposedly 'capped' UK points based system for labour migration, the government has ensured that the categories relevant to trade commitments have no numerical limits. There are no such limits on the 'intra-corporate transferees (ICTs) category in Tier 2 or on the 'international agreements' category in Tier 5. Neither is there any resident labour market test, which would stipulate that jobs have to be offered here first.

In fact both these restrictions are disallowed at the international trade level in respect of Mode 4.

Under the current points based system, skilled workers are currently being brought in and paid the minimum wage, which is then made up to a low industry norm with tax-free expenses and with no national insurance payable. Thus the UK government is even now encouraging the use of a cheap labour supply that not only displaces workers here but also damages the national economy in a variety of ways. Wages are repatriated overseas, the earn/spend cycle needed for recovery is broken, workers become unemployed and the welfare bill increases, the employment future for young people is further curtailed, and skills transfer are lost for the future.

As trade agreements, with Mode 4 included, are committed to hard international trade law, they become effectively permanent. This is why this handing of control of UK labour migration to transnational corporations will affect not only present but future generations. Any attempt by any future government to pull back on these commitments will potentially invoke corporate legal action to recover all anticipated profits that may be negatively affected by the government action.

International financial services corporations based in London are proactive in directing UK input to EU trade policy via their lobbying mechanism 'thecityuk' and in Brussels through the European Services Forum, the mechanism that influences EU institutions directly.

'Thecityuk' is made up of International Financial Services London (IFSL) and the Corporation of London and the UK Trade and Industry (UKTI) section of the Business, Innovation and Skills Department is closely connected. 'Thecityuk''s secretive Liberalisation of Trade in Services (LOTIS) Committee ensures that UKTI bureaucrats take financial services' own directives into EU trade policy like carrier pigeons. And UK governments ensure that domestic regulation is formulated to fit with this.

The Labour party has not told the UK public about this EU/India agreement and the centrality of the Mode 4 concessions even though Peter Mandelson initiated all the current agreements. Neither has the Conservative/Liberal coalition, even when David Cameron and Vince Cable led a specific 'trade' delegation to India in 2010. Greens MP Caroline Lucas spent years as an MEP and a member of the European parliament's International Trade Committee (INTA) but has declined to warn UK workers what they are being signed up to, and similarly Ukip, which has two members on the INTA but actually supports the concept of temporary labour from outside the EU being brought in by transnational corporations.

The House of Commons select committee tasked with overseeing the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has failed to bring the Department's role in moving workers into the country into focus and has accepted the silence of the secretary of state, Cable, on this.

Who will tell the UK public about these irreversible commitments on their behalf?

There is a small light at the end of the tunnel. The Railways, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union is going to argue to the TUC's September Congress that it should campaign to alert the UK public to the implications of the EU/India trade deal and of Mode 4. Yet, as the TUC has so far been part of the cover-up, it remains to be seen first if this motion is passed, and then what the TUC does with it.

Linda Kaucher is a researcher on international trade. With Masters degrees in Journalism and in Human Geography, from Australia and the London School of Economics, and a broad background as an educator, she campaigns to take the lid off trade secrecy. She has written articles for the Morning Star and submissions to government consultations. She was invited by the EU Trade Commission to make a presentation to its civil society dialogue on services trade.

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

The Tower Hamlets Factor

The Tower Hamlets Factor

Since 1997, the then Labour government opened the floodgates hoping that by doing so they would secure their power in many parts of London. Paradoxically, the master became servant when servants grew up in numbers and when the Labour Party expelled an Asian politician the said politician won the election in Tower Hamlets. Who calls the tune now? Does the Labour Party call the tune? I wonder if many Labour politicians were left scratching their heads and asking themselves ‘how could this happen?’

This can be seen not only in London, but also in other English cities (or should I say former English cities, taking on-board comments made by John Cleese?) With Demographic changes, there are political changes. This is to be expected. Look at the partition of Yugoslavia. What has been the argument about who owns Kosovo? This is bound to happen in Britain, especially because they have been building ghettos that usually have their own language, their own customs and their own values.

One day, we might find ourselves having to decide who own Birmingham, Leicester, Manchester, Liverpool and parts of London like Towers Hamlets and Barking and Dagenham or even London as a whole. Sometime ago we learnt that a delegation of the Church of England was told that certain areas of Birmingham were ‘off limits because they were Muslim areas’ and even Christian female Police officers went patrolling wearing headscarves ‘not to offend the local community’.

I have always believed that numbers matter and that when the time comes there could be a British Diaspora. Looking a birth rate numbers plus the numbers of those coming into the country, the writing is on the wall. Huge political changes are on the way. This is why it is so urgent to talk about British Identity. Somebody talked about the minimal incidence of Normans, Vikings, Romans and others in the genetic pool of Britain. He was talking about a few thousands new individuals. We are now talking about millions of individuals and this is the equivalent of many times the Normans, the Vikings, the Romans and others put together.

Nevertheless, when we look a numbers, genetics is not the main concern. The main concern is identity and political power. Faces will change but so will laws, customs and values. Our everyday lives have changed dramatically. The ‘London Experience’ of 1989 is radically different from the ‘London Experience’ of 2011.

Cameron the Great Dictator

Cameron the Dictator

Who does David Cameron think he is? Following hot on the heels of war-crimes liar “Adolf” Blair, it is now becoming more than obvious that Cameron, too, thinks he is a Supreme Dictator who can scoff at the constitution, dismiss democracy as a nuisance to his private plans, ignore the British voters completely and insist that the words which issue from his mouth must instantly become the New Law of the Land.

On Wednesday 7 September, Herr Cameron and the utterly unelected Supreme President of Europe Herman Goering – I’m sorry, I mean Herman Van Rompuy; wrong name, same politics – held a sinister plotting meeting at 10 Downing Street in order to secure their beloved European Axis from the threat of democratic voting by the electorate.

The Axis leaders are evidently petrified of the idea that the British people be allowed a referendum about staying in, or quitting, the European Union. Obviously, the greatest threat to Europe and its Reich Commisars is a population’s freedom to vote, because there is a chance the result will not be to the liking of the Reich. (“Reich” being merely the German word for “Empire”, it seems to be the most suitable, factual and realistic term to apply to the European Union in the form into which it has mutated since inception.)

This Axis conference was mainly engendered by the rapidly increasing numbers of formerly meekly obedient Conservative SS officers – sorry again, I mean Tory MPs (“SS”, of course, stands for “Sordid Sychophants”) – who are now dimly realizing that Britain’s continuing membership of the European Union is likely to be the absolute ruination of our once independent, once self-governed, once prosperous and once democratic country where the voters were allowed to choose who made their laws.

In response to some 80 Tory Members of Parliament who have urged Herr Cameron to do the decent (and legal) thing by holding the long-promised national referendum on whether or not Britain should be part of the European Super State, the Fuehrer (German for “Leader”: an apt title for Cameron) instructed his spineless underlings that – and I quote – “There is no case for such a vote… I don’t see the case for an in-out referendum on Europe. We are IN Europe!” (reference: Daily Mail 8/9/11).

The Leader has spoken! The entire voting population of Britain must accept that a European referendum is against the Great Dictator’s will – and, like all other Supreme Dictators in history who banned proper democratic voting by their people (including the ones in the Middle East that Britain’s equally undemocratic government has hypocritically assisted in deposing and executing) his orders must be obeyed without question at all times… Where, I wonder, have the British People heard this said before? (Quote: “Whatever you do, don’t mention the war”—Basil Fawlty).

Monday, 12 September 2011

Social Mobility and Equality of Opportunity

Social Mobility and Equality of Opportunity

By Andrew Brons MEP.

The Political Left believes that children are born with equal potential so if pupils from a poor background fail, their failure can be attributed to disadvantage and a denial of equality of opportunity. That is bad enough but those who would be seen as being from the Political Right seem to share their view.

The Daily Telegraph’s Education Editor, Graeme Paton, (17th June) referred to data from the Organisation for Economic co-operation and Development, in which it was shown that only 25% of ‘poor children’, in Britain, managed to exceed expectation at school, compared with 31% of ‘poor children’ in developed countries generally.

This suggested, according to Mr. Paton, that ‘disadvantaged children’ have less chance of climbing the social ladder than in most developed nations.

Indeed the Education Secretary, one Michael Gove, was reported to have said: “The scandal ‘which’ (I believe he meant ‘that’) haunts my conscience is the plight of those students from the poorest backgrounds in the poorest neighbourhoods, who need us to act if their right to a decent future is to be guaranteed”.

The OECD report revealed that 70% of poor pupils in parts of China exceeded the standard expected of them. Our 25% looked extremely poor in comparison or did it?

There are probably more talented children living in poverty in rural China, because their families have not previously been rescued by an effective education system.

It is small wonder that equality of opportunity should now be revealing their existence. There are still talented children in Britain, especially from poorer families, who fall through the net of educational opportunity. However, there are probably fewer of them.

The problem is that the Political Class generally confuses two related but distinct concepts: social mobility and equality of opportunity.

Indeed they are frequently treated as though they meant the same thing. Many commentators have bemoaned the fact that social mobility has fallen and they have attributed this to a denial of equality of opportunity. In fact the fall in social mobility is attributable to the success of equality of opportunity!

It is difficult to pinpoint a year in which equality of opportunity was attained but 1947 – the year in the Education Act 1944 was implemented- is as good as any. That was the year in which secondary education was provided for all and selective exams decided, more or less on merit, who would receive a Secondary Grammar education.

Since then, there have three or more generations enjoying equality of opportunity. Initially there would have been substantial social mobility resulting from the new equality of opportunity. Pupils, with innate ability, from humble backgrounds went to grammar schools and some from there to universities and other higher education colleges.

The professions and management positions ceased to be the preserve of those with upper and middle class backgrounds and became meritocracies. People within those occupational groups also tended to marry and procreate (now just procreate) with people of similar abilities. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that differences in intelligence are attributable to heredity rather than to environment. This has resulted in those in management and the professions becoming an intellectual caste and not simply a class caste.

Whilst there were many people of innately high intelligence in poorer occupations, before the advent of educational equality of opportunity, that number has fallen steadily in subsequent generations. There are still gifted children to be found in less well-off social classes but there are fewer now than there were and the proportion will continue to fall as they are ‘rescued’ by the education system from a future of economic failure.

Social mobility has indeed slowed down and that should be seen as a tribute to educational equality of opportunity.

Unfortunately, the story does not end there. The expansion of higher education by the Major and Blair governments came at a price. Whilst it was easily affordable to provide maintenance grants and pay tuition fees, when 7% of students went on to full-time higher education, this became impossible when the figure exceeded 40%.

The result is that all students must fund their own maintenance and pay their own tuition fees.

There are now students of mediocre ability from rich backgrounds who take a university place, whilst poorer more able students might shrink from going on to higher education if the experience should carry with it a burden of debt for several years.

We have seen a move away from equality of opportunity. It must be hoped that it will not continue. An answer might be for the most able students, if from poor backgrounds, and pursuing the most useful courses, to be granted a remission of tuition fees and to be given maintenance grants. That would preserve equality of opportunity. It would probably not add to social mobility appreciably.

However, of greater importance, is that there must not be a retreat from reason and reality by those who are seen to be on the Political Right.


Sunday, 11 September 2011


NEWS FLASH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11/9/2011. 19.48pm

A alert is being issued by EDL MEMBERS trapped at the weatherspoons pub at the Hyde Park Corner, by a mob of Muslims
Two have been stabbed and the police are standing by doing nothing .
it has finally happened the government agencies have declared open hostility to the indigenous people by allowing them to be treated less than animals .

An appeal is being made for all patriots in the area to go to the scene to aid their fellow country men from the attack from the islamist and government forces.

Tommy Robinson Leader of EDL Video Hunger Strike Update

Below is a video of the latest update of The sad state of affairs were a patriotic young man is in prison and hunger strike, just for exercising his so called rights of freedom of speech and peaceful protest. It makes it quite clear that we no longer live in a free country if you happen to be a indigenous human being of these islands.

The Labour Westhoughton Lord Mayor’s Cresch

The Lord Mayor’s Cresch

Labour Lord Mayor & Councillor molests Three kids after a 6yr old tells him of her sex education taught in her school and gets aroused.

Labour25 listed paedophile Nicholas Green.

Labour25 listed paedophile Councillor and Lord Mayor of Westhoughton Lancashire nicholas Green was sentenced to 10 years in prison for rape and molesting children and also a woman on her wedding day. Bolton Magistrates was a scene not yet seen by the public before as this Labour Party Paedophile multiple child sex attacker and rapist went on trial.

Once again a Labour Party paedophile Councillor makes his way towards a job with children

First of all were Labour25 listed paedophile Nicholas green’s indecent assault charges against Three children aged 6, 7, and 10 years old. Mothers had placed their trust ONCE AGAIN in a Labour Party Councillors reach. The parents placed trust in paedophile Labour Partys Nicholas Green’s wifes day time care service. She and Nicholas Green were unregistered as child minders.

Unknowing to Labour25 Nicholas Green’s wife, while she was not present, the Labour Party paedophile carried out a sickening sexual attack on the Six year old child. He then had indecent evil and sickening attacks on a Ten year old, before moving on to the Seven year old.

Other victims came forward, a young woman said that the Labour Party mayor had been abusing her when she was young and on her wedding day. Labour25 paedophile Nicholas Green blackmailed her into having sex with him by saying he would tell everyone that she had been having sex with him. The woman gave in and the woman was subject to rape by blackmail.

Another young girl came forward with four more indecent assault charges against Labour25 Nicholas Green, but the Judge ordered the crimes to be put on file. Police interviewed paedophile Labour Lord Mayor Nicholas Green after this girl had complained to them of the Labour25 paedophile abusing her.

After the police interviewed paedophile Labour Councillor and known marxist Mayor Nicholas Green he pleaded not guilty to the sex charges, but within 1 week of that interview, he molested another child.

The woman who was raped by Labour25 paedophile Nicholas Green on her wedding day had been thinking about suicide because Nicholas Green had been telling her that if she didn’t have sex with him, he would tell everyone what they were doing. This is surely the Marxist mind, to REVERSE the situation around to make the victim, the guilty one.

Labour Party Paedophile Nicholas Green said to police that he had been ‘egged-on’ by one of the children because of her talking to him about SEX EDUCATION BEING TAUGHT TO HER IN SCHOOL which had aroused him.

The Education minister for the Labour Party brought sex education for 6yr olds into the classroom and THIS IS WHY ! So peadophiles will have a clear understanding on the level that kids know what to expect when alone with them. Is this why Labour brought in sex education for 6yr olds? YES IT IS !

Defending the Labour25 paedophile party Councillor and Lord Mayor Nicholas Green was Robert Elias. ”He is a Labour Party stalwart ! A pillar of his Community!”

Nicholas Green ( another Lizard ) stood before Judge Timothy Mort … ” Your behavior was an appaling abuse of trust with children.” ”You will go to prison for 10 years and register with the police as a sex offender when you come out”

Follow us on twitter – Labour25 twitter