Search This Blog

Wednesday 16 November 2011

Chris Bryant MP - lABOUR Pervert and Politician of the Year

Chris Bryant MP - Pervert and Politician of the Year PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow
November 2011

chrisbryantpervert_120_x_120I was reading over on some news site or other, that the homosexual Member of Parliament for Rhonda, Chris Bryant had been voted Politican of the Year by the nasty and dangerous homosexual lobby group Stonewall.

It was at their sixth annual awards - where they pat individuals who have made a positive impact on the lives of homosexuals, on the back or maybe even on the bottom.

Their citation reads: "Politician of the Year - Chris Bryant MP. Chris Bryant has been garlanded with plaudits from across the political spectrum for his tenacious campaign against News International phone hacking. The judges were impressed with 'the resolve and tenacity' that Chris has demonstrated, as an equality advocate, in the last decade."

Now I am not a big fan of homosexuals but providing they do not start "fisting" and "rimming" each other in public and homosexuality is not promoted in schools as being "normal", they can do what they like in the privacy of their own closets.

However, that does not stop me being curious as to how their minds work - clearly not in the same way as mine or most normal decent people I suspect.

chrisbryantpervert_400_x_332

Remember this photograph and story about Chris Bryant? Can someone tell me just how this creatures behaviour is anything other than obnoxious and reduces the reputation of the Houses of Parliament even further - if that is possible.

Bryant, as to be expected from a creature that poses in soiled underpants on the internet soliciting for sex, is a former London Manager of Common Purpose - an organisation that according to BNP Ideas is just a harmless charity. Bloody intellectuals - thick as planks the lot of them.

How posing on the Internet in grubby pants makes for a positive contribution to the homosexual cause, I am not sure. Neither am I sure that Bryants involvement in the disgusting pigs in the trough scandal of MP's fiddling their expenses should have qualified him as making a positive contribution to anything. Then again, homosexuals clearly have different values to most normal people and so let them get on with their irrelevant awards.

Oh there was one laugh at the awards. The obese mountain of lard, Vanessa Feltz, who was voted Journalist of the Year at the awards, said "If I get another caller saying "It's Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" I will shoot myself in the heart". If anyone has gigantoes number can they please give her a call on my behalf and say those magic words that would cause her to go and make all decent people happy.

You may be interested in this other article concerning Chris Bryant - Politician of the Year.

Chris Bryant is not a panto dame - he is a pervert.

White teenage mother stabbed to death by Asian Cowards


White teenage mother stabbed to death and dumped in canal 'after her married Asian lover rejected her child'

  • Laura Wilson, 17, killed three days after she revealed to the families of Ishaq Hussain, 22, and Ashtiaq Asghar, 18, that she had had affairs with both men
  • Asghar 'sent text to Hussain day before she died which read: "I'm gonna send that kaffir bitch straight to hell" '
  • No Stephen Lawrence enquiry likely here I guess!
  • Read the Daily Mails version of this awful Anti British Anti White racist murder here

Tuesday 15 November 2011

Scottish National Party threatens England

Scottish National Party threatens England PDF Print E-mail
Written by Gary Raikes:
Britain First Scotland
November 2011

alexsalmond_120_x_120Alex Salmond, the leader of the Scottish National Party and First Minister for Scotland, speaking in Qatar, was at his belligerent best recently, arrogantly saying that England’s lights would be dependent on Scotland’s renewable energy in the future.

It is a complete fallacy to believe that England, our largest customer by far, would be dependant on Scotland for any product or service. As for North Sea oil being an answer to all our problems, Salmond omits to tell the truth that it is thanks to the Barnett formula that Scotland gets the same amount raised in oil tax back to spend in Scotland.

The truth of renewable energy is also glossed over as a major bank warned this week that electricity bills will more than double under Salmonds plan to build an independent Scotland on green power.

Citigroup claimed bills would soar by an average of £875 per household if the country goes it alone and pursues SNP plans to invest billions in wave and wind power.

A select few are lining their pockets as ordinary Scots face crippling fuel bills. The big power companies continue to rake it in posting profits that have climbed to billions every single year.

The main driver for this is the ROCs (Renewable Obligation Certificates) and feed-in tariffs that throw money at power companies and landowners.

This is the reason that Scottish landowners are keen to have their farms and estates industrialised by wind farms.

Sir Alastair Gordon-Cumming will earn £435,000 annually from 29 giant turbines on his Altyre estate while The Duke of Roxburghe will net £720,000 a year from his 48 400ft high turbines at Fallago Rig in the beautiful Lammermuir Hills.

In an attempt to conceal yet more truth from the people the SNP Government refused a Freedom of Information request to release its legal advice on an independent Scotland’s position with the EU, giving the reason that the answer would “prejudice substantially” the SNP administrations conduct and it would be “contrary to the public interest”.

The fact is that there is increasing academic and legal reasons that an independent Scotland would have to apply to join the EU. Accession states must accept all aspects of the EU. Not only would Scotland have to adopt the Euro, we would lose all the UK’s opt-outs thus finding ourselves in the same basket-case situation of Greece.

The SNP continue to show they are not nationalists who care about the ordinary people but just like the other parties spend time courting bankers, big business and rich landowners.

Mr Salmond’s disrespectful attitude to Great Britain, the United Kingdom and England in particular is frankly embarrassing.

Footnote by The Green Arrow

Gary Raikes is the Scottish Coordinator of Britain First, so if you live in Scotland and care about Scotland and wish to know more, then you can find his contact details here, along with an interesting bit of news about a new Britain First Group being set up in Fife.

Sunday 13 November 2011

LIBYA - THE MEDIAS LIE'S AND BANKERS AGENDA

LIBYA- THE MEDIA LIES AND THE BANKERS AGENDA

Many of you should seek the truth and not just accept what the bankers run media tells you , just watch to see what really went on in Libya!

Our British jobs and industry need protection

Our jobs and industry need protection

28th October 2011: Yesterday lunchtime, just before leaving the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Andrew Brons had hoped to make this contribution under the 'Catch the Eye' procedure to a debate on the conclusions of the European Council held the previous Sunday.
Disappointingly, he wasn't called to speak.
Andrew would have said:
"I refer to the report on Sunday's meeting (which was the agenda item).
The laudability of a stated aim does not mean that the chosen means are either appropriate or likely to be successful.
Merely to say that you are in favour of sustainable and job-creating growth should not be enough to put you on the side of the angels.
The Single Market might be beneficial to large businesses always seeking cheaper factors of production but do not presume that everybody is a winner and that there are no losers.
The EU promising to reduce the overall regulatory burden is like a recidivist criminal promising to do something about crime. He will do something!
Tucked away in paragraph 4 is a eulogy of the Euro Plus Pact. Under the headline Competitivenes, in the Pact, is the advocacy of abolition of wage indexation. Real wage cuts, we are told, will increase competitiveness - this is the price we pay for embracing Globalism. European countries do not need international trade liberalisation; they need protection for their industries and their jobs."

Saturday 12 November 2011

mmigration - now it’s the British elderly who are expected to pay the price!

Immigration - now it’s the elderly who are expected to pay the price! PDF Print E-mail
Written by Richard Barnbrook
November 2011

terraced houses

A shock report issued by the newly formed, left-wing pressure group, Intergenerational Foundation, is out to make war on one of society’s softest targets: the elderly.

In their unashamedly ageist attack on senior citizens, whom they consider to be fair game, the Foundation, launched by Labour’s Tessa Jowell, has issued a report that is blatantly draconian and hostile to the interests and well-being of the elderly - all in the name of ’fairness’, of course. The proposal is that because of the current housing shortage, older people should be taxed out of their family homes in order to make room for younger families.

On the surface this might seem to be a sensible suggestion, but when seen in the light of the fact of the net figure of over a quarter of a million immigrants entering the country last year, the implications become far more sinister.

As I have been saying for a long time, large numbers of newcomers need to be both serviced and accommodated somewhere - because it’s a fact of life that you can’t squeeze a quart into a pint pot. (And I make no apologies for using imperial measurement!) So, where shall we put them all? Where indeed! According to the Intergenerational Foundation, the answer’s quite simple - turf out all those lonely oldies living in three bedroom houses and push them into accommodation that is ‘more suited to their needs,’ to make way for younger families! So much for the age-old saying ‘an Englishman’s home is his castle’!

When, oh when will the British public wake up? How much longer will they be prepared to sit back and watch their birthright being stolen before their eyes? Our national sovereignty has been hijacked by Brussels so that we can’t even make our own laws any more. Our politicians ignore our wishes, even though we elected them to represent our interests. Our children are being sold short in the education system, health tourists from abroad exploit our already over-stretched NHS, and our own people can’t get jobs, which are being given to foreign nationals. And now, senior members of society, who deserve respect and the dignity of some space in their declining years, having worked all their lives to earn it, are blatantly being told to move over because they are in the way! Even to make such a pointed and offensive suggestion is indicative of how far some politicians are prepared to go in this full-scale attack on the interests of the people of this country.

The only comfort that I can draw from this disgusting and shameful attack on the elderly is the fact that Tessa Jowell herself is clearly no spring-chicken! In the not too distant future, she may live to rue the day that she affiliated herself with such a barbarous bunch of ageist bigots!

The Euro Creating Penury for UK and Europeans

The Euro Currency: An Incompetent Disaster Creating Penury for Europeans

By Andrew Moffat.

“Euro-realists” have long warned of the dangers that would arise from the single currency. Simply put, different countries have evolved dissimilar economies. Those economies reflect varying economic models, trading patterns and infrastructures. They also function at diverse degrees of efficiency and are, to a significant extent, a product of their peoples.

The advent of the European currency has stripped the governments of the 17 member nations of their rights to determine their monetary affairs. By ‘monetary’ affairs, we mean the ability to set interest rates – usually via their Central Banks – and to determine the value of their currencies, usually via the markets.

The prevailing interest rate and the value of a currency, in general terms, reflect the health of a nation’s economy.

In recent years, the Bank of England has cut interest rates to record lows, currently at 0.5%. Sterling, the UK’s currency, has lost approximately 20% of its value, reflecting the condition of the UK economy and its yawning trade deficits. Had the UK joined the single currency in 2005, say, the UK’s interest rates would have been set by the European Central Bank (ECB) and would now stand at 1.25% – following the ECB’s recent cut. There would, moreover, have been no depreciation to Sterling; the UK economy would be locked into the value of the Euro currency, against which Sterling has devalued in recent years.

One of the principal difficulties afflicting the single currency, amongst the 17 nations who comprise the Eurozone, is differing rate at which the individual economies grow.

In general terms, the northern economies, particularly Germany, are dynamic and efficient. In the south, the reverse is generally the case: these economies are less dynamic and inefficient. As this gulf widens, so do the economic strains between the two blocs.

Up until the advent of the Euro currency and since the 1950s, the German economy has only ever revalued upwards its currency. By contrast, the southern member nations always devalued their currencies.

Such revaluations are no longer options. This means that as the German economy, for example, becomes more efficient, its exports grow more competitive on world markets. Unlike in the past, there is no mechanism by which an equilibrium can be reached, simply because there is no longer any Deutschmark which can be revalued.

In the south, the opposite is true. The Italians and Greeks, for example, whose economies are becoming more inefficient against their northern competitors, cannot devalue their currencies. Nor can they reduce their interest rates, now determined by the ECB.

What can be done? The answer is that to become more efficient are regain their competitive edge under the current system, the southern economies must reduce their costs. This means they must also reduce their wages.

This is easier said than done. If wages are to be decreased instead of increased each year, how do families pay their mortgages, debts or rents?

If wages are reduced, where does the money come to pay the taxes the government requires to maintain its spending? Indeed, where does the money arise to keep the economy in shape and industry healthy?

The answer might be found in this interesting statistic. In all of the past 10 years, the Italian economy has grown by less than 1%.

Wage levels are still enormously out of line and there is a wide divergence in costs with the more dynamic northern economies. A cut of some 25% in Italian wages would be necessary to restore competitiveness, given there is no Italian Lira to devalue and restore competitiveness.

The backdrop is even more ominous because the Italians possess a vast national debt of some Euros 1.9 trillion. Simply put, there is no growth in the economy to pay off this debt and the Italians are instead running structural deficits where the national debt keeps rising.

The Italian dilemma, rather like the bigger Euro-currency dilemma, has not been lost on the markets. The perceived inability of the Italian government to address its deficit has resulted in its government’s bond yields rising from less than 4% in recent months to more than 7% last Thursday.

Some readers may recall that these were levels that precipitated crises in Ireland, Portugal and Greece, causing their bail outs by a combination of the EU, the ECB and the IMF and, in the case of Ireland, by the British taxpayer. The UK, of course, also contributes to the IMF.

The difficulty last Thursday involved merely Euros 4bn of Italian debt. Next year, the Italian Government must refinance Euros 300bn of debt, which it needs to roll over to later maturities. How will this be possible? Certainly, at a coupon of 7%, it will be unaffordable to finance this level of debt.

Who owns the Italian national debt? For the most part, other banks own this debt, especially Italian banks. Should these banks fall into difficulties, the Italian Government will have to bail them out and raise further funds on the bond markets to do so – creating a further downward spiral in the value of its existing bonds, held by the same banks!

Greece is a forerunner of the type of predicament in prospect. Its economy is a fraction of the size of Italy’s and the country has become entirely dependent upon bailouts from the ECB, the EU and the IMF, with its bond market no longer operable and its existing bonds trading at high double digit yields. Greece has therefore had to re-schedule its debts – a form of default.

In order to balance its budget, to pay for its bailouts and its rescheduled debts – largely owed to the banking system – Greece will be placed even more firmly through the EU’s wringer. As one commentator stated recently: “Greece has been subjected to the greatest fiscal squeeze ever attempted in a modern industrial state, without any offsetting monetary stimulus or devaluation.”

The EU is, in effect, repeating the mistakes of the Federal Reserve between 1929 and 1932, during the great depression. Unlike the USA, however, the EU is not a nation.

Monetary stimulus is impossible so long as Greece remains within the Euro currency. In other words, Greece has lost its monetary sovereignty and, as a result, its fiscal sovereignty.

The constraints it has had to endure are prescribed because it is a member of an internationalist political scheme, overseen by unelected EU Kommissioners, which has resulted in its economy contracting by some 15% since its problems began. Its debts ill magnify to over 180% of GDP next year and even after re-scheduling, will stand at 120% of GDP by 2020.

In other words, future generations of Greeks will become wage slaves to serve the ideal of ever ‘closer political union’.

There are several measures the EU may take to facilitate the continuation of monetary union. It could, for example, create a system whereby the wealthier northern nations guarantee or purchase the debts of the poorer nations. It could also encourage a new competence, whereby the EU gains the right to tax the citizens of the ‘Union’ and it could require that the tax revenues of the wealthier countries be used to finance the borrowing or some of the expenditure of the poorer countries. By means of compensation, the EU would tightly regulate the budgetary policies of the poorer nations and oversee the regulation of their economies.

Another possibility is to provide the ECB with more flexibility.

Currently, the ECB has been purchasing the bonds of the afflicted member nations in an attempt to support their prices and maintain or reduce their yields. Invariably, it has suffered colossal losses. The ECB is backed by the subscription capital of the EU member states, including the UK. Ultimately, if the ECB experiences financial difficulties, it will be backed by the taxpayers of the member states.

The ECB could be provided with the right to create new money to buy the bonds of the afflicted member nations. This would be the equivalent of the Bank of England’s programme, known as ‘quantitative easing’ (QE). Like the other possibilities, this proposal is opposed by Germany. The German Government sees no reason why its taxpayers should rescue the economies of the afflicted member states. It also considers ‘QE’ to be akin to a sticking plaster, that fails to address the underlying causes, whilst risking the spectre of inflation – which it experienced in extreme circumstances in the 1920s.

There are, of course, some alternative solutions which will not be countenanced by the EU.

Germany could leave the Euro currency. It would regain its Deutschmark, which would soar on the currency markets. The Euro would fall in value without the German anchor and the southern nations would then become more competitive.

The southern nations could also form a separate currency bloc, which would align their interests more closely. This possibility has already been discussed by Germany but it would create a two-tier system, which is unattractive to the Kommissars of the EU.

Better, Greece could leave the currency union and recreate the Drachma. The Drachma would plunge on the currency markets but the Greeks would again become competitive and would, after a year or two of upheaval, enjoy economic growth. Clearly, Greece would have to re-price Euro debt into Drachma debt, to avoid paying devalued Drachma’s to redeem more expensive Euro debts. Such a scenario would entail a further default on its Euro debts. On the other hand, the Greek Central Bank could again issue its own currency, a right it lost when it joined the Euro – which partly explains why it is now dependent upon EU bailouts to keep its economy afloat.

Whilst the UK remains outside the Eurozone, the UK Government is obliged to produce annual budgets that meet the convergence criteria of the EU, with a view ultimately to joining the single currency bloc. Andrew Brons, MEP, obtained this information in a Question he put to the Commission recently, which can be found here and here.

Share

Thursday 10 November 2011

Muslim Grooming, So are we going to "deal" with this problem or not?

So are we going to "deal" with this problem or not? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow
November 2011

girl-in-cage_120_x_120Earlier this week on Monday 7th November, Channel 4's Dispatches programme had the courage to tackle a serious problem that our cowardly politicians and police refuse to recognise.

Namely the sexual exploitation of white British female children by the predatory paedophiles from the Pakistani and Bangladeshi colonisers.

Dispatches appears to have been very careful in their choice of investigative journalist chosen for the task and selected Tazeen Ahmad, an attractive and intelligent Pakistani woman who was brought up as a moslem.

Ms Ahmad has a history of fronting programmes that deal with Islams shameful oppression of women and also how inbreeding within the colonising Pakistani forces are producing children ten times more likely to be born with recessive genetic disorders that wind up costing the True British People a fortune to treat in our over burdened hospitals.

Now in all fairness, Ms Ahmad did a good job given the subject, as I suspect, that a white journalist would not have been given the opportunity to ask the questions of the colonisers that she was free to ask. A white interviewer would most likely have been accused of being a "racist" and then run out of their areas of occupation.

But no Ms Ahmad called a spade a spade and said that it was wrong to say that the paedophiles were "Asians" and pointed out that these animals were predominantly of Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin and that the problems from these communities needed to be be dealt with most severely.

The Dhimmi white police officer and white politicians interviewed, of course took great care not to point at ANY particular race and trembled with fear in case they be thought of as being "racist".

Now the attitudes of the young Pakistani men interviewed, who explained just how they mind screw the young girls for months before sexually assaulting them prior to pimping them out to old moslem men was a real eye opener into the mindset of the people who are taking over our country and shows what the future for white women is going to be like unless British Men start to grow some balls and fight back.

White girls are there to be exploited and "ask" for it - the smaller they are, the higher the charge, the younger they are, the higher the charge, the tighter they are the higher the charge. Our Children, sold like pieces of meat to perverts who only see these children as sex objects and not as young children or even human.

Now here is where we can learn a lesson from them for once. A male moslem "community" worker was asked why "Asian" girls were not treated in the same way as the young white children and his reply said it all.

He said that because "their" communities were so tight, that should any moslem try such a thing then they would be "dealt" with. It is time white people came together as real communities and "dealt" with this problem at local levels.

Now the programme carries a warning that it contains descriptions of sexual violence that some viewers might find upsetting. Well I do not know about upsetting - it should fuel more than that in any True British Male.

You have 28 days from now, to watch this show and can do so by clicking on this link. I urge you do to so.

A Brave New World?

A Brave New World? first published at the VBR site PDF Print E-mail
Written by Wowbanger
November 2011

Huxley_120_x_120I was provoked to write this riff in response to a discussion held in the British Resistance chat room. In response to my assertion that it was impossible to wrest control of the state from the elite, they themselves being a integral part of it rather than some directing force, my esteemed colleague Mr Anglo-Australian offered the opinion that this was a council of despair. Clearly I have failed to explain the elegant analysis of anarcho-nationalism. So I here offer some thoughts on it.

All serious political thought must consider the likely environment our societies will be in over the next lifetime or so at the very least. For example if Bavarian political thinkers of the first two thirds of the nineteenth century failed to foresee the unification of Germany, then anything else they planned on was irrelevant. Likewise even great plans such as Jefferson’s and Ghandi’s ideas on agrarian democracies were fatally flawed in their inability to account for the consequences of industrialisation. We are therefore obliged to consider what the future might hold if we wish to formulate a course of action which is to stand any chance of success.

Broadly speaking there are two schools of thought on the probable nature of the future of the West at least.

Option One; the triumph of Progressivism.

In this scenario the elites succeed in holding together our societies eventually arriving in the sunlight uplands of the Progressive utopia. That looks a bit like this. Globalisation reaches its logical conclusion. The entire planet is under the direction of a “meritocratic” (or self selecting) “englightened” elite operating the mechanism of a global state. This state might or might not be federated to some extent. However given its scale it is in no way democratic and any individual within it, unless they be one of a tiny few, can't expect to have any meaningful influence on the political, economic or social conditions in which they must live.

The economy is fully globalised with free movement of goods and labour. The consequence of this is that organic communities are entirely destroyed. Every individual is just that and has no other nexus of community than what they have with the state and whoever happens to be living within striking distance of them. Wages are low, but then again so is the price of goods and services. A tolerable life is therefore within the reach of most, however the possibility of generating enough surplus capital to allow freedom from wage slavery is remote. Indeed even the dream of owning your own dwelling is beyond the reach of the vast majority.

Through the apparatus of the state, now augmented by awesome techniques of information gathering and analysis, the elite is able to “persuade” most people to adopt their values. The power of the mass media and the ability of state institutions to indoctrinate through the education system is now irresistible. As a result there is an almost universal consensus in favour of Progressive values in favour of the new status quo. People are materialistic, conformist and bourgeoisie in their moral structures.

How you want to describe this scenario is up you. Some might call it egalitarian, just, virtuous and free. I would be likely to use words like totalitarian, fascist, elitist and stagnant. If it had a historical precedent it would be Aztec civilisation less the more obvious brutality.

Option Two. In this scenario the elite fail to outrun the entropy generated by their own actions and consequently their utopia does not transpire. This might happen as the result of a spectacular system failure resulting in something indistinguishable from an Apocalypse or a more gradual disintegration. Both models of societal collapse have been seen before in the historical record however the later is more common for large scale civilisations.

It’s not hard to distinguish the terrible forces currently bearing down on our civilisation. Mere population growth threatens to overwhelm the resource base of the planet after which nothing good can happen. Alternatively resource depletion such as the early Peak Oil theory offers the thrilling prospect of a freight train coming the other way towards the derailing overpopulation express. Then we have the potential chaos generated by climate change. Perhaps most subtly of all we have the prospect of structural systematic collapse. The technological and economic development of our societies is not in the hands of people planning for the Benthamite principle of “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Rather our system is self organising to be efficient and “profitable” (often erroneously thought to be the same thing), we call this capitalism. It is entirely conceivable that the system could evolve in such a way as to fail to offer our society what it needs to survive. Else evolve itself into a corner from which it cannot escape. It seems highly probably that this has already happened.

And of course whilst each of these four horsemen are themselves a show stopper, there is no reason why two, or all, of them might to materialise simultaneously. This is the idea referred to by James Howard Kunstler in his prescient book The Long Emergency: Converging Catastrophes of the 21st Century.

Indeed, it’s not very difficult to imagine in the event of a societal collapse historians would have no problem in tracing the roots of that collapse back at least decades, if not centuries, before the present day. In other words if the elite don’t pull their fantasy society off looking backwards it will appear to future generations not that we are at the start of civilisation level disintegration, but that we are right in the middle of it. Everywhere you look on every front the elite’s dream is crumbling, the level of “civility” of our society is in retreat, our economic power wanes, our armies are broke and defeated and our societies are increasingly polarised on multiple axis’s. Nor is this a recent development.

So on the face of it, either option one or option two or any intermediate position does not look particularly enticing. A Fascist Utopia or a New Dark Age. The difference being that the second option offers at least dynamism rather than a dead future on an inescapable prison planet. Indeed the Old Dark Age is increasingly seen by philosophers and historians to have been rather underestimated. After all the Roman Empire, which saw itself exactly as our Progressive elites see our society, didn’t fall because of its wild popularity or because of the goodwill it generated among its citizens and enemies.

The advent of such a Dark Age would most likely be uncomfortable for most of us in all sorts of ways. It stands an excellent chance of being fatal for significant numbers of us. However it is possible to foresee a world stabilising out of the chaos which is far from unattractive.
The collapse of nation state level powers ensures the re-emergence of localised economies and political structures. These at least have the possibility of being human scaled and the probability of offering a real diversity of modes of life. Direct democracies, citizen states, radical communal and/or cooperative ownership of economic enterprises, self sufficient agricultural communities, city states and tribal confederations; in other words everything which existed before the industrial age.

Sure, Hi Def 3D TV and 50mg broadband might be considerably less available than in the Fascist Utopia of the elite. Maybe a long retirement might be a little less of a realistic possibility than it is now. However there could be compensations in quality of life which might mean than shorter simpler lives are not to be judged inferior to those we currently “enjoy”. Perhaps we would be happier, as social creatures, in fully reintegrated communities even if hot water was a little less easy to come by.
So, where does this prophesying leave us as the radical right? It’s simple enough. In the event of option one, the fascist utopia, there is almost no chance of us or anyone else wresting control of the state from our elite. If option two were to come to pass, well then, it’s a fair bet that we get what we want by default. Since as the radical right we have argued for 200 years that we had better respect our own nature, and that of our planet, when those natures reassert themselves the outcome is very likely to be quite attractive to our sensibility.

The role of the radical right in the 21st century is therefore not to futilely battle the elite for control of doomed state apparatuses but to push against the open door the future which is already upon us. Instead of hopelessly fighting rigged elections for control of the apparent levers of nation state power we should be beginning the work of building the social, political and economic infrastructure of our own communities which they will need to survive and prosper in the future. The elite can have their ball, we’re going home.

And here is the real beauty and elegance of anarcho-nationalism. It argues for a state which is more or less certain to come about. And this is no accident, it is the product of a deep reflection on our nature and that of the world around us, from a fearless assessment of our past and future, it is not the product of hubris and arrogance like progressive ideologies rather it is the justification for what must and will be. It offers a solution which works with nature rather than against it. And here is the real kicker, even if this were not the case and the elite were likely to achieve their demented utopia? Well then the obvious way to resist would be through exactly the kind of secessionist localism anarcho-nationalism promotes. Symmetry like that can not be ignored. Welcome to 21st century nationalism companeroes.

Tuesday 8 November 2011

The British People’s Voice - Important

The People’s Voice - Important PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow
November 2011

power120_x_90This is a request from the British Constitution Group to send the letter copied below to your Member of Parliament.

Please read it and if you agree with the contents, please print it out, sign it and then send it on to your MP as soon as possible.

After you have sent the letter could you please email the BCG and let them know you have done so. Here is the letter for you to copy. A word document will made available once I have the link. Game on.

For the attention of David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Edward Milliband, and all Members of Parliament


We have had enough.

This letter is a warning - from the people. It is not a request that requires an answer, but it does require a response - by way of action on your part that demonstrates that you understand its substance and the seriousness of our intent.

The collective political establishment has betrayed the British people by transferring our national sovereignty to a foreign power without our consent. This is in defiance of our constitution and an act of treason.

You do not need to know how many people we represent today, only how many we might represent tomorrow and you should know that our numbers grow daily. This letter thus serves as your window of opportunity to make amends and give remedy for the crimes committed against us. We will show compassion for those who recant and we will be ruthless with those who do not concede to the wishes of the people.

Ignoring this letter is not an option... if you think it is, then this serves only to demonstrate that your intellect is subservient to your arrogance. You may feel that you can ignore it because you are too powerful, but to do so is to underestimate the seething resentment that the people feel for the political establishment in general.

I, the undersigned, did not write this letter, but it expresses what I think about the way that we are being misgoverned. You have acted in contempt of the principles of democracy and shown total disregard for our right to govern ourselves. It does not matter who penned the words of this letter, what matters is what it says.

For the past several decades the British people have been treated with extraordinary and total contempt by the collective political establishment. It has not mattered which political party has been in office or ‘power’ as you insist on calling it, nothing ever changes. We are continually subjected to the same global agenda. We have been used and abused like pawns in your game of supremacy in which a dynastic ruling class see themselves as ordained to rule as masters - with impunity, whilst we the people, as virtual slaves, are supposedly destined to obey – without question. You have persistently and consistently undermined our democracy by agreeing to treaties with foreign political elites who have no business in our affairs.

You have rewarded yourself with the trappings of office - high salaries, luxuries denied most of us, privileges, pensions, prestige and benefits that we can only dream of... whilst burdening us with ever-higher taxes, derisory pensions and declining standards of public services. It is we who pay the price for your malfeasance.

The story of Britain over the past several decades that will be told in the history books of tomorrow is the story of betrayal, greed, corruption, nepotism, treason and modern day fascism – the latter of which manifests itself in the global agenda being imposed upon us against our will.

The European Union - a step process towards global governance is now fully exposed. Built on lies and deceit is being hoisted by its own petard - the edifice is crumbling but still the political elite like demented fools, continue to feed on their own delusions. The docile masses, mesmerised by trivia, propaganda, complacency and ignorance have still somehow managed to grasp some basic elements of the truth, alerted almost certainly by the blatant and arrogant refusal of the political elite to tell the truth even when it stands proud in the rubble of political deceit and betrayal.

The political class are discredited at every level. They rant about the benefits of our subjugation to a foreign enterprise, peace, prosperity and democracy where in reality chaos, dictatorship and corruption reign supreme. European economies are on the brink of collapse because of the corrupt banking cartels, there is visible resistance on the streets and people call for lawful rebellion. But less known, there is clandestine resistance behind closed doors. Whilst the majority advocate a peaceful uprising, the extremes will always be in the mix and when passion and anger are fused and those aggrieved can find no remedy... violent resistance is as understandable as the passion for life itself.

The police and militia that you currently rely on to defend yourselves against the people’s retribution... are made up of our own, they are not your people – and when they learn about your betrayal and your intent.... AND THEY WILL - they will turn against you. Their awakening, which you cannot stop, is your Achilles heel. Your greatest fear must be that we will impose upon you the regimes and repression that you had planned for us.

People are meeting in groups across the country, talking across oceans... they are disparate, disorganised and without an effective plan to repel the global agenda... as yet. BUT a leadership is emerging... organisers are co-ordinating and small groups are linking to form larger groups. The dichotomies of left v right, Christian v Muslim, , black v white, Catholic v Protestant, which have been used to great effect to divide and conquer in the past, will find no favour in this war. The call to arms that will unite us will be ‘the people v the global elite’ – the cry will cascade street to street and find easy passage and universal support – for our common purpose has greater value and strength than yours.

We have a constitution – which you ignore. We have been denied our democratic rights, regardless, we have clearly expressed our wishes, in one opinion poll after another, that we do not want to be governed by a foreign unelected officialdom, but still you disregard us. We are promised a referendum on our future, but then you recant. You speak in support of our views when in opposition, but act to the contrary when we elect you.

You consult with corporate executives, international bankers, non-government organisations, international charities, academia, foreign dignitaries, political elites, think tanks and lobbyist – collectively a tiny minority, who do not represent us. These groups all emanate from the same social strata, with their own agendas to satisfy and all funded by the same cartel. You take note of their every whim, but you care not a jot for what we think or what we want. Your children are given jobs, with big salaries fresh from university and then rapidly climb the corporate ladder as reward by the same corporate bodies who you have favoured with your decisions. Our children must make their own way in an increasingly desperate world. Your corporatism suppresses our freedoms with deliberate and malicious intent.

You accommodate tyrants, dictators, arms dealers and all manner of dubious characters, with whom you are happy to keep company. You turn a blind eye when the smell of money wafts your nostrils... it suppresses the stink of corruption and evil. Your moral compasses are defunct... your values deplorable and motives despicable. Our soldiers die to service your corporate agenda – their blood is on your hands.

You are educated at the same elite schools and members of the same elite clubs and you allow these influences to override the consideration which should be paramount in service of the people. You have adopted the “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” philosophy... because you have learnt from your predecessors that corruption and deception do indeed pay. The European Union is awash with it and you have determined to get your snout in the same trough. You take comfort from the fact that you control those who have the authority to indict you for your criminality... because they too have fallen prey to the corruption. You have sold off our national resources to your friends, divided communities, deprived villages and towns, undermined, destroyed and bulldozed. You have laid waste where once prosperity was enjoyed. But you have not suffered... you have remained aloof, disengaged, uninvolved - removed from the debris and the misery that you have wreaked upon the rest of us.

We have seen our three billion annual fishing industry handed over to foreign control for nil reward. Our farms no longer feed us, crippled by regulations made to favour foreign farmers. Our ship-building has been dismantled and our merchant fleet whittled to nothing. Our armed forces are under strength and we see foreign troops being trained on our own soil on the pretence that they may be needed to protect us... when the reality is they are being trained to subdue us... to protect you from our vengeance. Our children are victims of social engineering in the schools and declining standards of education. They are being sexualised by explicit exposures before they have the emotional maturity to be able to cope. You are destroying their minds and their childhoods.

You have engineered a police state with legislation that empowers you at our expense and you have been blatant in your contempt for our democratic and constitution rights and our common law, which have been known to us for centuries. You deny us our rights and our freedoms and contemptuously imply that you can provide us with a new Bill of Rights. Would we seriously trust a thief with our wallets? You have corrupted our courts by appointing judges who are contemptuous of our common law and you have bowed to the pressure of foreign elites who have inflicted their inferior system of justice upon us... without our consent. You have not defended our interests... you have conspired merely to enhance your own.

You have dissected our nation and sold off our infrastructure. We buy our own water from foreign corporations who grow rich on the back of our suffering. Pensioners die of cold because they are unable to afford their heating bills visited upon them by foreign corporate greed. You are then rewarded by them with lucrative directorships when you slip quietly from office with your bulging pensions. You remain oblivious, unconcerned... disconnected. We will no longer be ignored as you go about you globalist agenda. We will resist your controlling and petty rules and regulations... we will resist your fines and penalty charges and challenge your corrupt and biased judges, we will defy the over-zealous police, and your oppressive and unlawful taxes.

It is our intention to govern ourselves... we do not seek your permission – this is our right. You have had your opportunity and you have failed. We will take control of our own lives in stages, as and when it suits us. Our numbers will grow as we show by example that prosperity is the natural consequence of honest and fair governance. We will expose you for the parasites you are.

This country has a constitution – which you ignore. We have Magna Carta, the declaration and the Bill of Rights... we have trial by jury, habeas corpus, the coronation oath. We have our customs, traditions and common law. We have the right of petition, free speech, and free movement and above all... we have the right to govern ourselves. These are our inalienable rights – they are not privileges granted to us by you or your ilk. They cannot be taken away or extinguished at the whim of political diktat or through corrupt judicial process and certainly not at the behest of foreign undemocratic institutions. You have no authority to dictate... your duty is to serve.

We do not recognise regions imposed upon us by Europeans to affect their control over us - to divide and to conquer us. We are a sovereign nation... a proud people. We have watched our country slowly destroyed... by you - we now see clearly what you have done... your purpose and you betrayal. We will honour our inheritance – the freedoms fought for and secured for us, and we will ensure that we will pass this on to the next generation, to our children and theirs.

You have been sent this letter by a constituent. On sending a copy to you, they have also registered your name with the coordinators. This will remain with us as evidence for your trial... for treason, should it be necessary. It’s your choice.

We are many – you are few... and our leaders are emerging.

You have been warned.

Signed

Name

Address