Can you make any sense of the witless reasoning given by neo-communist Judge Bean for keeping migrants in the Bell Hotel? Just look at what he said:
‘The Epping residents’ fear of crime, of limited weight, is clearly outweighed by the undesirability of incentivising protests, of preserving the status quo, and by the range of public interest factors.’
Let's beak this down:
1) "The Epping residents’ fear of crime, of limited weight, is clearly outweighed by the undesirability of incentivising protests."
If protests are undesirable, surely keeping the hotel open can only incentivise protest? This clearly makes no sense at all, so how can such a cognitively dissonant statement be used to override residents fear of crime?
2) "The Epping residents’ fear of crime, of limited weight, is clearly outweighed by.... preserving the status quo."
Status Quo means: "the existing state of affairs, especially regarding social or political issues" but bearded migrants of fighting-age suddenly taking over British hotels is a social and political abnormality that deviates 180 degrees from our existing state of affairs, no?
3) "The Epping residents’ fear of crime, of limited weight, is clearly outweighed by... the range of public interest factors."
The Epping resident ARE the public. Their interest IS the public interest. Bearded illegals are NOT the public so why is there a "public interest" in them, and what exactly does Judge Bean mean by a "RANGE of public interest factors" which he makes no further mention of?
And why does the "public interest" place more importance on their being here than the crimes they will commit against Epping residents? What is SO important to Starmer's government about these illegal aliens that makes their presence more important than the crimes they will commit?
Neo-Communist Judge Bean's statement is simply a hatefully anti-English word salad of meaningless mumbo-jumbo, which I suppose is why it was employed in the first place. After all, it is so much better than the actual truth which is: "The presence of fighting-age illegal aliens in Britain is much more important to the British government than the crimes they WILL commit against British girls."
And if this is a fact - a perverse, unthinkable, horrifying fact - you would do well to consider ALL possible reasons as to why Starmer wants 250k Afro-Islamic men of fighting age garrisoned all across our country....
