Integration - Another Damn Fool Idea What We Need is NOT a Great Big Melting Pot.   N Griffin Follow Nick on Substack Follow Nick on Twitter While some ethno-nationalists are wasting their time with a glittering chunk of Fools’ Gold (see my earlier piece below) their civic counterparts are waving a silver-painted Turd on a Stick - ‘Integration’. “Immigration isn’t a problem”, according to the civnats, “it’s the failure of so many of them to integrate into our society. We need to slow down immigration, and to pick those we allow in more carefully, then all the newcomers would turn out just like us and we’d all live happily ever after.” The two fantasies - Integration and Remigration - are unrealistic wishful thinking, but they are wrong in totally different ways. One is a Bad Idea which could happen. The other is a Good Idea which won’t happen. The problem with Remigration is not that it is undesirable in principle, but that it is not going to happen on a scale anything like large enough to stop us becoming minorities in our own homelands. The problem with Integration is that, if it happened, it would mean that, rather than being a minority, our people would eventually simply cease to be. Both are damn fool fantasies, and they are both wasting time and energy which need to go into preparing our peoples for the reality of the future. But, of the two, integration is by far the worst because, if it happened, it would destroy us. Trust in remigration is the error of good people who mean chose a path to ethnic salvation which is in fact a time-wasting mirage. They are wrong, but they mean well. Trust in integration is an optical illusion promoted by bad people who want to destroy us and ours completely. Every step towards integration is another step closer to the implementation of what is most succinctly termed the Kalergi Plan. The intended end result - desired and pushed for by several different - though often interlocked - vested interests, is miscegenation on such a scale that the free, and potentially rebellious, white nations of the world are replaced by populations of raceless, rootless helots. The servants, playthings and victims of a small caste of eternal masters. Of course, those advocating this ethno-cultural assisted suicide scheme don’t present it like that. Integration is instead ‘sold’ as the way by which we retain or regain control of our own countries and our own destiny. What is also never explained is how - even if we could find immigrants who would behave and become like us - this would in some way stop them replacing us. Indeed, the most dangerous thing about ‘integration’ is that the more it is achieved, the more it encourages miscegenation. Sick of TV's 'Kalergi Plan Breaks'? Nick Griffin · Nov 13 You know what I mean. We all see it. Or rather, we don’t see it – a white family which still represents the large majority of families in the population at which the adverts are aimed. Read full story Now, if we were 95% of the population, there would at least be an argument for saying that integration and racial mxing would ‘do away’ with the problem of immigration by the process of swamping them with our own genes as well as our culture. The elders of Britain’s post-war West Indian communities used to complain about this very process, which they called ‘whiting out’. Racial purists will, of course be horrified by the suggestion but, don’t worry, iin reality it’s not even on the table - because the situation is already way too far gone for that to work. We are not 95% of the population. We - the white peoples of the world - are no more than 8% of the global population. And, in our own countries, our offspring make up perhaps an average of two-thirds of all the children. This, furthermore, is a proportion which is falling rapidly, as our institutionally anti-white political and economic elites continue to flood our countries with Third World immigrants (most of them ‘legally’). Integration - another damn fool idea Under these circumstances, integration is not a way by which to assimilate immigrants into our population, it is a way to disintegrate our ethnic and cultural identities into the genocideal liberal melting pot. When you’re an ageing 8% of the world’s population, assimilation is not the path to salvatin, it’s the road to Hell. Burn this equation into your mind, eart and soul: Integration = Annihilation. So, since Integration is arguably possible, but disastrous, and Remigration is disastrously impossible, what is the answer? In a word, segregation. For reasons I have explained earlier here on Substack, we’re not going to see the back of our uninvited guests any time soon. We will quite quickly be able to stop calling them ‘minorities’, because we'll all be ‘minorities’. If we are to make this new social arrangement work, we are the ones who need to change the most. Which is just as well, because we have precisely that capacity. Indeed, the retribalisation of our peoples advanced faster in 2025 than in all the previous decades since the beginning pf the ghastly ‘multi-racial experiment’ put together. The idea that millions of people from very different races and cultures would simply become English, or Irish, or French or Swedes, was always a total non-starter. There is nothing magical about our air or soil which can turn Africans into Scotsmen or Turks into Germans. It’s just not going to happen. The very best we can hope for - if our people continue to wake up and get their acts together - is that we, the indigenous creators of our homelands, become the indispensible ethno-religious-cultural core, the national pole around which all the ‘Others’ revolve. I have spoken to Muslim Syrians who told me that it was the significant minority Christian presence in their country which used to act as the glue that held their potential fractious society of less tolerant minorities together. Whether that’s tue or not I don’t know for sure, but the idea offers a bit of hope. Not as much, of course, as the proposal that our peoples, by dint of their indigenous status, organisational ability, high average intelligence, true Christian values and potential for systematic sadistic violence, come to form such formidible community blocks that all th others decide that we are not to be messed with. Bear in mind that most of them came here because they’d rather not be there, and that this was primarily because we had stopped running things there but still ran things here. Accordingly, it is perhaps not too unrealistic to hope that we may reinvent ourselves as the guardians and guarantors of stability and decency. But to do that, we need to maintain our blood lines, culture and numbers as the largest minority. Which is why integration and assimilation will remain such dangerous concepts. Rather than calling on the Others to adopt our ways, we need need them therefore to accept that our ways underpin the whole of society. We don’t want them to become like us, we simply need them to accept that a society based on us and our values in a better society not just for us, but also for them. As I said, that’s the best we can now realistically get. Failing that, then the only good news is that the community building and attitudes we need to inculcate in our future generations to fit them for that best scenario will also equip them to survive in the event that the worst comes to pass. Indeed, if you are one of those readers who still insists on hoping against hope that ‘remigration’ is possible, you should reflect on the question of which sort of white communities will be best placed to help it happen. Those led by people who have spent several decades assuring everyone that, one day, a bunch of political knights in shining armour will ride in to put things right? Or those led by people who have worked on the basis that there are no magic wands and no knights in shining armour, and who therefore devote themselves to setting up structures and parallel institutions which instill in our people a strong sense of identity, unity and a willingness to stand up and fight for their rights?  If you appreciate Nicks work, but aren’t yet ready to become a subscriber on Substack, perhaps you’d feel good at least buying me a coffee. “Many a mickle maks a muckle”, as my ancestors on my fairly remote Scottish side would have said. Thank you! “Buy Me a Coffee” HERE

On Becoming a Minority in England

 

On Becoming a Minority Not Recommended, But Not to be Feared By  Nick Griffin Follow Nick on Substack follow Nick on X The more I read and hear of the ‘hardliners’ calling for ‘total remigration’, the more contempt I have for them. Not because I don’t agree with their concerns: The prospect of our children becoming minorities in our own country fills me with horror. The injustice and dangers of this development are off the scale. Not because I disagree with ‘mass deportations’ in theory. If it could still be done, if I had a magic wand to wave, I would do it. The pain and unfairness to our erstwhile guests would be more than outweighed in my mind by the pain and unfairness which it would save our people - and, indeed, future generations of theirs. The disruption and heartache caused by such measures would be far less than the problems which all of us - our current immigrant populations included - will face if the ‘multiracial experiment’, goes as badly wrong as it clearly could (especially given the number of groups out there with vested interests in it going wrong). My problem with ‘remigration’ is not that it shouldn’t happen, but that it cannot happen. I will not repeat what I’ve said previously about this, other than to sum it up as: Remigration is a policy which requires state power to enforce. While populists will exploit immigration as an issue to get elected, their subservience to capitalist and anti-white lobby groups means that they will never “send them back” in any serious numbers. The era of Western populism is only just beginning, it will take perhaps twenty years for populist parties to come to power and hold it for long enough for electors to see that they have no answer to the demographic disasters engulfing our nations. By the time that happens, there will not only be no serious possibility of building an electoral majority for radical remigration policies, but also no chance of the rapidly ageing and shrinking indigenous population being prepared to fight the civil war which ‘mass deportation’ efforts would kick off, let alone win it. The remigration snake oil salesmen can hawk their policy on as many social media platforms as they want, and will probably find enough desperate and gullible fools to keep them in business for a while longer, but it’s not going to happen. Apart from a few thousand criminals and Islamists, no-one is getting ‘remigrated’ against their will. So what does this mean? In short, the end of an era, but not the end of our people. Once we understand this, we can begin to plan and to work accordingly. This is not to ‘sell out’, or to ‘go soft’, it is to face facts. This must be our starting point, if we are to help our people get through what is coming. Face the Storm Refusal to face facts is a combination of stupidity, cowardice, laziness and grifting. It’s stupid because pretending an incoming storm isn’t going to hit doesn’t stop the storm, it just makes you unprepared when it does, and thus more vulnerable to damage. It’s cowardly, because a man is called upon to take action to try to protect his people from danger, rather than lull them into a false sense of security by telling them lies about painless solutions. It’s lazy, because saying that there is an electoral solution coming at some stage in the future provides an excuse for not doing anything constructive in the here-and-now, And it’s grifting, because the motivation of the key promoters of this nonsense is to make money from it; personal income which would be drastically reduced if they told the truth and set to work to encourage their followers to pour money and effort into building the organisations and structures our people need to exist, compete and thrive in the future which we all see coming. This is why, while I have sympathy for those good but simple souls desperate enough to swallow the Remigration Snake Oil, I detest those who sell it to them. New and Strange It is certainly true that being the largest minorities in entire societies of minorities will be a new and very strange way of living for us, although it is by no means rare either historically or in other parts of the world at present. Europeans were the minority in North America from the time of the very first settlements up until about 1820 - roughly speaking, then, for half of the entire history of the white man on the continent. We remained the minority in the Great Plains and the West until even more recently. Whites were the minority in the frontier lands for more than 250 years. The conquest of America was not easy, but neither was it really carried out by a majority. Even once the white man totally dominated the eastern seaboard, the settlers in the frontier zones of the time were generally a minority. The British ruled India for a similar length of time as a tiny minority but, apart from the crisis of the Mutiny, were never at risk of being exterminated. The European seizure of Africa, likewise, was the work of almost unbelievably small numbers. Rhodesia and South Africa both fared very well as white minority rule states until their destruction, disasters brought about not by African terrorism but by the hostility of the liberal West, the Communist East and - in the case of South Africa - subversion by an anti-white fifth column within. White settlement and minority rule in Rhodesia began in the 19th century, became a political rebellion against Westminster liberalism in 1965 and continued until 1979. In 1976, there were 270,000 Rhodesians of European descent and six million Africans. the ratio of 22:1 may have been too large for the situation to be maintained in the long-term, but the fall of White Rhodesia was far less about demographic imbalance than it was about international pressure and betrayal. The White Rhodesians were undefeated in battle. Had they been even 30% of the population, nothing would have stopped them. There’s an even better example of successful resistance to demographic discomfort much close to home. Protestants, most of them originally from England or Scotland, were the minority in Ireland from the Reformation right through until Partition in 1921. Over 350 years, they both oppressed and were repeatedly threatened with massacre and expulsion by the Catholic Irish majority. They retained their identity, culture and power throughout the whole of that time. The Irish, meantime, resisted and ultimately overcame their powerlessness by developing their own parallel cultural and community organisations. After each of their risings was defeated militarily, acceptance of that reality did not constitute “surrender”, it merely marked the beginning of a new phase of resistance. In the long run, the establishment of the Gaelic Athletics Association did more to advance Irish identity and freedom than all the doomed schemes to encourage peasants armed with clubs and pikes to take on the might of the British Army. Hurling - one of the sports deliberately created by Irish nationalists as a counter to what they called ‘garrison games’ imported by the Brits. The Gaelic Athletics Association has played a central role not only in Irish resistance to foreign rule but also in sustaining a vibrant national identity. After the creation of Northern Ireland, it was the turn of the Catholics to be the minority. Did they sit down and tell each other than this meant that they could do nothing? That - to name the fear implicit or explicit in current nationalist discourse on demographics - “all minorities end up being exterminated like the Boers”? Absolutely not, while a tiny minority took up arms and turned to terrorism, the vast majority of Catholics just got on with having babies, going to church, manning the various cultural, sporting and community associations which kept their community together and campaigning for their rights. From 2021 onwards, it as been the Protestant loyalists who are the minority in Northern Ireland. Anyone tempted to believe the alarmist claim that “once you are in the minority you’re on the slippery slope to subjection and extermination” needs to spend a couple of days in the Province. Yes, the loyalists are now once again in the minority, but if you try to tell any loyal Ulsterman that this makes them the potential victims of genocide, they would laugh at you. If you want to know why, just go along to any one of the band parades that are held throughout the spring and summer of every year, in every Protestant area. You will see thousands of uniformed young men, marching with precision that puts most British army regiments to shame. Drumderg is part of Keady, a small town of some 3,000 people, of whom a mere 10% are Protestants. Isolated in the notorious IRA ‘Bandit Country’ of South Armagh, most of these young men are from families who have lost at least one close member to IRA terrorism and attempted ethnic cleansing. But they’re still there, on their own land and in their own enclaves, and no amount of either talk or force from hardline Fenian fantasists is going to ‘remigrate’ them to Scotland, England, or even to the loyalist heartland an hour’s drive to the north east. Leave a comment Mono-Ethnicity - Safer, But Rare For reasons of history and geography, the nations of Europe, including Britain, have developed regarding mono-ethnicity as the norm. History confirms that it is certainly a much safer way to run a society than struggling to build something stable out of mixed-up populations of different ethnicities and religions. But, overall, it is the exception rather than the rule when it comes to human settlement. While multi-ethnic societies are unwelcome, abnormal and often threatening to peoples like the English, Germans, Swedes and so on, people in countries as different as India, the Middle East, Malaysia and the Russian Federation have lived with them for centuries. Further, when malicious foreigners or ideological or religious supremacists don’t interfere to stir the pot, they generally muddle along reasonably well together. The risk of such destabilisation, and the relative ease with which it can be done, are strong arguments against the wanton transformation of a stable, monocultural nation into a “vibrant, diverse, multicultural society”. Message Nick Griffin But we no longer have the luxury of living in nations which BBC bigwigs describe as “hideously white”. We don’t have any choice about the sort of society in which we have to live, but we do have a choice about how we deal with it. The Remigration con-men would have you stick your head in the sand for the next two or three decades, even though that position leaves your arse distinctly vulnerable to anyone who takes a fancy to it. My counsel is to stand up straight and face the future. As you’ll find if you come to Northern Ireland, being a minority is by no means the end of the world. In fact, it can give you and your community a sense of belonging and cohesion which you may well find beats being part of a complacent, ultra-individualistic, materialist majority. Your parents were consumers in a land of lonely consumers. Your children will be part of a tribe. You can hark back to the past, and earn their contempt. Or you can work for the future, and help secure their place in it. Coming very soon - more of the things that can be done to make that difference. So subscribe NOW and help my work here. Thank you! A Fertile Time for Nationalism Nick Griffin · Dec 5 There’s never been a more fertile time for the development of real nationalism in Britain. The huge success of the grass-roots Raise the Colours operation both reflected and encouraged a feeling of desperation at the way the country is going and a collective determination to do something about it. Read full story

There's a sickness in Britain's public life

 By Jim Chimirie

There's a sickness in Britain's public life: we have replaced judgment with performance. We have handed moral authority to the stage and let actors decide who belongs in this country. Olivia Colman, Emma Thompson, Stephen Fry, Judi Dench, Brian Cox – a roll call of national treasures who lined up to read script lines and wept on cue for a man they barely understood. They weren't defending justice. They were auditioning for sainthood.

Alaa Abd el-Fattah called Britons "dogs and monkeys." He said he "fucking hates white people." He wrote that killing Zionists, "especially civilians," is heroic. He praised Bin Laden. He dreamed of our streets on fire. These weren't stray remarks. This was a worldview. A creed of racial contempt and revolutionary bloodlust. And Britain's cultural class didn't bother to look. They didn't want to look. Because the point was never him. The point was them – proving their virtue to each other like teenagers comparing scars. Keir Starmer called Abd el-Fattah's return a "top priority." He said he was "delighted" when the man landed in Britain. Delighted – as if a racial arsonist was a trophy of moral progress. As if British Jews didn't exist. As if the names Westminster, London Bridge, Manchester and Birmingham had been whitewashed from the national memory. Starmer isn't conflicted. He is consistent. His politics is powered by applause from the international set, not the safety of his own citizens. Celebrity pity replaced national judgment. Emotional theatre replaced due diligence. The Home Office didn't vet – or didn't want to. The civil service looked away. Westminster saw a cause, not a threat. In modern Britain the question is never "Is this man safe?" It's "Will supporting him make me look virtuous to the right crowd?" Conscience has been turned into a prop. The country has been turned into an audience, expected to clap on cue. Name them. Olivia Colman, whose trembling voice lent saintly gravitas to a man who spat on her country. Emma Thompson, forever the moral matron of the luvvie class, too busy basking in applause to read the record. Stephen Fry, who will condemn intolerance at home but clasp the hand of a man who wanted Zionists dead. Mike Leigh. Mark Ruffalo. Emily Watson. Rebecca Hall. Joseph Fiennes. Harriet Walter. Sir Bill Nighy, beard grown for gravitas, telling the Prime Minister to "make the call" – and the Prime Minister did. They summoned a man who would happily see the country that knighted them burn. This wasn't a mistake. It was a ritual. The ruling class performed virtue, the celebrities performed conscience, and Britain paid the bill. They needed him to fit a story: the "political prisoner," the "prisoner of conscience," the symbol of everything they think makes Britain look enlightened. They didn't check who he was because the truth would have broken the spell. Violence abroad is romantic in their eyes. Violence at home is a misunderstanding. Hatred is fine, as long as it is directed at the right targets. The ECHR forced the door open. Successive governments refused to close it. Its architects still pretend it's the noble post-war shield it once was, even as foreign judges veto laws passed by the people who live with the fallout. A serious country would have walked the moment protecting its own became "unlawful." A serious country would say: glorify terror and you lose your passport; call for blood and you're gone. But Britain isn't serious. Britain is obedient – to treaties, to NGOs, to foreign approval, to the moral vanity of its own elite. What we are watching is national self-harm dressed as progress. A country apologising for existing. A cultural class so besotted with its own virtue it can't tell a dissident from a fanatic. They think they are rescuing a hero. They are opening the gates. They think they are proving virtue. They are advertising weakness. "The point was never him. The point was them – proving their virtue to each other like teenagers comparing scars"