German MEP Christine Anderson on the hidden forces

 

By Camus
German MEP Christine Anderson recently shared her perspective on the hidden forces shaping global governance. "I don’t know who’s truly behind it," she admitted. "It’s not Ursula von der Leyen—she isn’t making decisions. It’s not Bill Gates, nor even Klaus Schwab. They’re not the ones calling the shots. These are just the public faces, the ones who stick their heads in front of cameras and push this totalitarian nonsense."

Anderson argues that the real power lies with an elusive group she calls, for lack of a better term, "globalitarian misanthropists." "I have no idea who they are," she said, "but they’re the ones pulling the strings. Our elected governments? Mere puppets, implementing whatever these shadowy figures dictate." She believes their ultimate goal is clear: "They want a one-world government, transforming our liberal, open, democratic societies—built on free individuals—into a collectivist system where people are just malleable parts, shoveled around as needed." For Anderson, this agenda explains the very existence of the European Union. "Look at Europe," she continued. "This small continent, with its rich tapestry of cultures, traditions, histories, and languages—its people are proud. You could never convince them outright to abandon their nation-states and sovereignty for a one-world government. They’d resist. So the EU was created as a stepping stone." She pointed to the historical pretext: "They say, ‘Oh, we’ve had so many wars here, we need to unite as Europe to stop it.’ That’s true enough, but it’s a convenient excuse. The EU institutions are steadily absorbing more power, conditioning Europeans to accept the next leap—a full global government." Anderson sees this as a deliberate, gradual erosion of national identity and individual liberty, orchestrated by those she deems "globalitarian misanthropists." "It’s not about peace," she concluded. "It’s about control."

German MEP Christine Anderson recently shared her perspective on the hidden forces shaping global governance. "I don’t know who’s truly behind it," she admitted. "It’s not Ursula von der Leyen—she isn’t making decisions. It’s not Bill Gates, nor even Klaus Schwab. They’re not the… pic.twitter.com/9DISYSqkhY

— Camus (@newstart_2024) April 6, 2025

Nick Tenconi Speaks At Two-Tier Policing Protest

UKIP leader Nick Tenconi speaks at Turning Point UK's anti-two-tier policing protest opposite Downing Street. http://ukip.org/join

USA Government Pressures UK Two Tiers Kiers Tyrannical Government Over online Freedom of Speech

 Dear Gab Supporters,

The battleground has shifted, and the stakes have been raised. Our relentless fight against the UK government's tyrannical Online Safety Act (OSA) has now intersected with crucial international trade negotiations between the United States and the United Kingdom. Thanks to your support our legal team has been able to make in-roads with communications on our behalf to the White House, the DOJ, and other relevant government agencies regarding our battle for free speech against the UK government. Thank you to those who have donated to support these efforts, you played a crucial role in helping us get to this point. 

Reports confirm that the US government is actively pressuring the UK within these trade talks, demanding assurances that the draconian Online Safety Act will not cripple the operations of US-based digital platforms like Gab.

Here's the situation:

• The US and UK are negotiating a significant trade deal, driven partly by the UK's desire to offset potential new US tariffs.
• A major sticking point is the UK's Online Safety Act – the very legislation demanding Gab implement censorship or face crippling fines (up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue) and even potential criminal charges against individuals like me!
• The US, historically protective of its tech companies (often citing principles similar to Section 230 which limits platform liability), is pushing back. They are reportedly seeking provisions in the trade deal that would prevent the UK from holding US platforms liable for user-generated content and imposing other restrictive measures mandated by the OSA.

This development is a direct consequence of the extreme overreach we've been warning you about. The UK's attempt to export its censorship regime and attack American companies is now meeting resistance at the highest levels of international negotiation.

Why This Matters:

1. Validation: This confirms that the OSA isn't just a threat to Gab; it's recognized by the US government as a significant impediment to international commerce and potentially harmful to fundamental principles like free expression online. The concerns raised by Big Tech companies about privacy (like scanning messages) and over-censorship mirror our own warnings.
2. Leverage: The UK's desire for a favorable trade deal gives the US leverage. This pressure could force the UK to reconsider or dilute the most harmful aspects of the OSA that target platforms like ours.
3. The Core Conflict: This highlights the fundamental clash: The UK's authoritarian drive to control online speech versus the American principle (however imperfectly applied by Big Tech) of platform freedom and user expression. Gab stands firmly on the side of free speech.

However, we must remain vigilant. While this US pressure is a positive sign, there's no guarantee the UK will fully back down. They may try to carve out exceptions, find compromises that still harm platforms committed to real free speech, or prioritize their domestic censorship agenda over the trade deal benefits. Furthermore, the US negotiators' primary concern might be protecting large corporations, potentially overlooking platforms like Gab that truly champion free speech principles.

Our fight continues, regardless of these negotiations. We cannot rely on diplomats trading favors. We must continue to build our independent infrastructure, strengthen our legal defenses, and stand firm on our principles. The threat of massive fines and the outrageous possibility of criminal charges against individuals for upholding free speech remain potent weapons in the UK's arsenal.

This situation underscores the critical need for resources to navigate this complex international battle and withstand the ongoing attacks, including the economic warfare targeting our infrastructure providers.

The Fight Intensifies – Support Gab's Stand Against Global Censorship: [DONATE NOW]

(

Europe TUNE in for WAR? Neil Oliver raises CONCERNS over the mood in Eur...

Neil Oliver and Ralph Schoellhammer dig into what’s really going on across Europe — from war funding to political power plays. Are our leaders working for the people, or just chasing profit and control? It’s time to ask the hard questions.

Why we must Write and Record History

 Why we must Write By Letters of Rome 

In our tumultuous world there is the tendency to give up, walk away, and turn our back on trying to make a difference. It is understandable as an easy life was promised to no one; although this modern world deceived us into believing it can. And what does making a difference even mean? The world has forever been a brutal place. I’ve seen no evidence of it being otherwise through the years I have devoted to studying it - not that I’m an expert but I have delved back a few thousand years into the Roman and Greek past. While our clothes are different, human nature has not changed. I doubt it ever will. What is this “difference” we think we can make? I have come to realise that it is not so much a difference as a contribution to how we see the world, and through our eyes whether it can impact another person trying to find their way in it. Our experiences matter. To us, and to others even if we don’t see that occurring. It could take generations to reverberate. We don’t control the timeline, merely contribute to its trajectory, all the while others do the same. So, we must Write to record our experiences. How else will anyone in the future know we have been here? We must record history

Has the Free Speech Union sold Out?

Has the Free Speech Union sold Out? It is sad to hear that No Jab! No Job! and Don't let em socialise multi millionaire Charley Mullins has Joined the Free Speech Union. I find it a oxymoron that A denier of Civil Liberties and the freedom of ones physical sovereignty could…

— Horwich Nationalists (@ivecooper) April 4, 2025

UK Labour Government Continues Assault on GAB Freedom of Speech Social Media Site Update

 Just days after we exposed the UK government's escalating attacks – including their admission of targeting our infrastructure providers in an act of economic terrorism – new developments confirm that our warnings about the dangers of the UK's Online Safety Act are being recognized at the highest levels, while simultaneously revealing the truly draconian nature of their threats.

First, the Vindication: A recent report in The Guardian has revealed that officials from the U.S. State Department directly challenged the UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, regarding the severe threat the Online Safety Act poses to freedom of expression.

According to the report:

-Officials from the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) met with Ofcom in London.

-During this meeting, they explicitly raised concerns about how the Online Safety Act risks infringing free speech.

-A State Department spokesperson confirmed this, stating: "As vice-president Vance has said, we are concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”

This is significant validation of everything Gab has been fighting against. Even elements within the US government recognize the UK Online Safety Act for the threat it is.

Now, the Stark Escalation: While Ofcom downplays the Act, claiming it only targets "illegal content," the reality is far more sinister and extends into unprecedented personal threats. The scope of this law isn't limited; it potentially applies to any user-to-user service accessible in the UK.

And here's the truly chilling part: Buried within this tyrannical legislation is the power for UK authorities to bring criminal charges against named senior managers at companies deemed non-compliant.

Let that sink in. They genuinely believe they have the authority, under this Act, to target individuals – like myself – and potentially send American citizens to PRISON for the supposed crime of refusing to implement the UK's subjective censorship regime on a US-based platform protected by the First Amendment.

This isn't just delusional; it's a stunning display of authoritarian overreach. It's as if they've forgotten we operate in the United States, under US law. This threat to literally imprison executives of foreign companies demonstrates the absolute extremity of their censorship agenda and their disregard for international norms, national sovereignty, and fundamental rights.

What This Means:

Our Fight is Justified & Now Validated: The US State Dept. acknowledges the free speech risks.

Ofcom's Narrative is Disproven: Their actions and the law's text reveal a broader censorship goal, now including threats of imprisonment.

The Stakes are Personal and Existential: This is no longer just about fines or deplatforming; it's about the potential for criminal prosecution of individuals for upholding free speech principles.

Urgent US Action is Imperative: "Expressing concern" is insufficient when faced with threats of economic terrorism and potential imprisonment of US citizens by a foreign government over constitutionally protected speech.

We are leveraging this validation from the State Department, combined with the exposure of these outrageous personal threats, in our ongoing communications with the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, The White House, and other relevant bodies. We demand decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to protect American companies, American citizens, and the foundational principle of free expression from this foreign aggression.

This fight has reached a critical intensity. The UK government is not just attacking a platform; they are threatening individuals with imprisonment for defending your right to speak freely. We must have the resources to fight back on all fronts – legal, technical, and political – against this multi-faceted assault.Defend Free Speech & Stand Against Tyrannical Threats: [DONATE NOW]

(Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. International supporters, due to the ongoing payment processor blockade likely linked to these attacks, please use the Bitcoin option on our donation page for now.)

The masks are off. The UK's agenda involves censorship, economic warfare, and now, the audacious threat of jailing individuals who refuse to comply. We will not be intimidated. Stand with us now, stronger than ever.

Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.

With unwavering resolve,

Andrew Torba and the Gab Team

Christ is King

David Irving on Winston Churchill’s links to organized Zionism

 

David Irving on Winston Churchill’s links to organized jewry. pic.twitter.com/o6USN6zsd6

— Words Are Words (@Wordsarewordsz) April 3, 2025

JFK was the Last True American President

 

Monero Mavrick

JFK was the Last American President

 - Israel got nuclear weapons after they killed him - He wanted to splinter the CIA and scatter it into the wind - He wanted to destroy the federal reserve and replace it with silver and gold notes - Executive order 11110 was issued by JFK on June 4th, 1963 - 🧃started immigration with the “Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965” - Increased US AID, now $3B annually - Formed Strategic alliance - Diplomatic support, The US provided Israel with diplomatic support which meant vetoing UN resolutions critical of Israel - Israel increased their military cooperation, including joint military exercises and the sale of advanced military equipment to Israel - Diplomatic immunity: Israel was granted diplomatic immunity by the US, which protected Israeli officials from prosecution in the US - Economic benefits: Israel benefited economically from its relationship with the US, including access to US markets and investment - Increased influence in the US: Israel's influence in the US increased significantly after JFK's assassination, with Israel gaining more control over US foreign policy in the Middle East. - Ability to annex territories: Israel was able to annex territories, including the West Bank and Gaza Strip, without facing significant opposition from the US - Access to US intelligence: Israel gained access to US intelligence, including satellite imagery and signals intelligence, which has aided its military operations In conclusion. Yes Israel killed him. Every single president since then has been a puppet

JFK was the Last American President

- Israel got nuclear weapons after they killed him
- He wanted to splinter the CIA and scatter it into the wind
- He wanted to destroy the federal reserve and replace it with silver and gold notes
- Executive order 11110 was issued by JFK… pic.twitter.com/ItTKbfV5EO

— Monero Mavrick (@MoneroMavrick) April 2, 2025

A Massive White Pill on Birth Rates presnted by Nick Griffin

 

Nick Griffin with the stunning news that we are NOT being swamped by "fast-breeding Muslims"

The Call for the Great Appeal Act of Parliament Grows

 In a Tweet MP Rupert Lowe has called amongst others for a Great Apeall act. In my opinion to Get rid of all the hideous Laws introduced by the Blair and following Traitorous governments subversive laws disguised as equality legislation. 

We desperately need the Great Repeal Act to return total power to Parliament.

Only then can that be followed by overdue national restoration.

Wonderful video from @Brewgaloo_.

pic.twitter.com/TFHojxA5CL

— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) April 1, 2025

Update: UK Government Escalates Attack on Gab Free Speech Social Media

Last week we outlined the UK government's direct assault on Gab and free speech through the tyrannical Online Safety Act. We detailed their demands for censorship and exorbitant fines, which we unequivocally refuse to comply with. Now, the situation has escalated dramatically, confirming our deepest concerns about the lengths these forces will go to silence dissent.

The UK government has openly admitted in recent interviews that their attack extends beyond legal threats against Gab directly. They have publicly stated their intention to actively target Gab's essential infrastructure providers – the very services that keep our platform online – in a malicious attempt to pressure them into deplatforming us. Let's call this what it is: economic terrorism waged by a foreign nation-state against an American company.

This is a calculated, extra-jurisdictional attack aimed not just at censoring speech they dislike, but at destroying a US business and silencing American voices protected by the First Amendment, simply because we refuse to bow to their authoritarian demands.Stand Against Economic Terrorism & Censorship: [DONATE NOW] (Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. Due to the likely related ban by our international processor, overseas supporters can currently only contribute via the Bitcoin option on our donation page. We are working on alternative solutions.)

This isn't just about fines anymore; it's a direct assault on our operational existence. By threatening our hosting partners, payment processors (as we've already seen with our international processor ban), and other crucial service providers, the UK government is attempting to achieve through back-channel coercion what they cannot legally achieve directly: the complete eradication of Gab.

This confirms that the fight we described is not merely about differing legal interpretations; it is a coordinated campaign to cripple platforms that champion free expression. They know Gab stands as a bastion of open discourse, and they are deploying scorched-earth tactics to make an example of us. If they succeed in pressuring infrastructure companies to drop Gab, they establish a terrifying precedent to do the same to any online service, American or otherwise, that doesn't toe their ideological line. Our resolve remains unshaken. We reiterate:

We will NOT comply with UK censorship demands.

We will NOT pay a single cent in fines.

We will fiercely defend our rights as a US company under the First Amendment.

We will continue to provide a platform for free speech for ALL people, including our users in the UK.

This escalation makes the fight more challenging, but it also clarifies the stakes. They are targeting the foundational pillars that allow Gab to function. This requires us to redouble our efforts in building resilient, censorship-resistant infrastructure and mounting an even stronger legal and political defense.

We are continuing to engage with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, and other relevant US authorities to highlight this unacceptable foreign interference and economic aggression against a US entity. We repeat our call for decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to counter this blatant attack. Now, more than ever, we need your support. This fight against state-sponsored economic warfare requires significant resources.

Your contributions directly fund:

Securing and diversifying our technical infrastructure against these targeted attacks.

Aggressive legal defenses against unlawful pressure campaigns.

Ensuring Gab remains operational as a sanctuary for free speech.

This is no longer just a warning shot; the UK government has declared open economic warfare. They believe they can bully and bankrupt us into submission by attacking our partners. We must prove them wrong. Stand with us today to defend not only Gab but the fundamental right to speak freely online without fear of state-sponsored economic destruction. Thank you for your unwavering courage and support. We will hold the line. Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.

With unwavering resolve,

Andrew Torba and the Gab Team
Christ is King

Click Here To Donate And Support Gab

 

 

Waitrose sacks wine expert over political tweets – help him fight back FSU member Ben Woods, who worked at Waitrose for 25 years, ending up as a wine specialist at the Henley branch, has been dismissed for expressing his conservative views online.   The tweets that Waitrose deemed sackable offences included support for Reform UK, reposting a Telegraph cartoon and asking whether the children’s book In My Daddy’s Belly: The Story of a Transgender Dad Giving Birth was “spreading misinformation”.   According to John Lewis, which owns Waitrose, its social media policy forbids posts that could be deemed “bullying, harassing or discriminatory”. Understandably, however, Ben believes he’s been targeted for his political opinions. “Waitrose has been treating me like a criminal,” he says. “I’m a conservative. That’s not illegal.”   Ben will bring a claim for unfair dismissal and discrimination under the Equality Act.   Please help him by donating whatever you can here. Every contribution sends a message that sacking people for expressing their perfectly lawful beliefs mustn’t go unchallenged.

No charges in Koran burning case following Free Speech Union intervention

 

No charges in Koran burning case following FSU intervention In a significant victory for free speech in Britain, a man arrested for burning a copy of the Koran in Bradford will not face charges, following intervention by the FSU.   Dheyaa, whose full name we’ve withheld because of the numerous threats against his life, arrived in Britain as an asylum-seeker. Ironically, he was fleeing religious persecution.   After he uploaded a video of himself burning a Koran in a symbolic stand for freedom of speech and against Islamic extremism, West Yorkshire Police reacted swiftly – not to protect his right to protest, but to arrest him on suspicion of inciting religious hatred.   The FSU intervened immediately, instructing a solicitor and covering Dheyaa’s legal fees. He recently learned that the police have decided not to charge him.   This is, of course, great news – but Dheyaa should never have been arrested in the first place.   Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008 and causing offence is not a crime. Provocative political expression, however distasteful some may find it, can’t be legally suppressed without clear evidence of incitement to violence or a threat to public safety. Nonetheless, authorities are increasingly misusing public order laws to clamp down on the desecration of religious texts.   Against this backdrop, the outcome in Dheyaa’s case demonstrates how essential early intervention and legal advocacy by groups like the FSU remains in resisting attempts to criminalise provocative yet legitimate speech. Full details here.

 

Victory for free speech in the workplace In a major win for workplace free speech, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have abandoned plans to impose new diversity and inclusion rules on financial firms after strong pushback, including from the FSU. Had the proposals gone ahead, they would have placed sweeping new obligations on a significant portion of the UK’s financial sector.   In January 2024, we responded to two consultations (here and here), warning that the plans would create a climate where employees feel unable to challenge prevailing ideologies without fear of professional consequences. Our response to the FCA consultation was submitted via its online portal, but you can read our letter to the PRA here.   Now, rather than tweaking their original ideas, the two bodies have announced they have “no plans to take the work further”. This means the FSU has successfully helped to block yet another attempt to impose political conformity under the guise of corporate governance. Needless to say, we will continue to oppose all similar attempts.   Click here to join us and support the FSU in defending the speech rights of our 28,000+ members in the workplace and the public square.   Full story here.

Nick Griffin to appear on David Icke Show

 

Whatever you think - or are told to think - about Nick Griffin he deserves the right to be heard and present his point of view. This is what Ickonic is all about - freedom of speech AND freedom of reach in the sense that those who want to watch can do so. It's called 'free… https://t.co/ew01j8O93h

— David Icke (@davidicke) March 31, 2025

 

Is freedom of the press safe in Sir Keir Starmer’s hands? In October 2024, Sir Keir Starmer wrote in The Sun that “journalism is the lifeblood of democracy” and his government would “always champion press freedoms”.   It was a nice soundbite – but as Director of Public Prosecutions, Sir Keir set in motion Operation Elveden, the CPS’s pursuit of journalists accused of paying sources for information. After five years of dawn raids, arrests, dozens of charges and several trials, not a single journalist was convicted in court.   To mark our forthcoming publication of a powerful essay by former Sun political editor Trevor Kavanagh about Sir Keir’s behaviour as DPP, the FSU is hosting a special panel discussion on the state of press freedom in Britain.   Trevor will be joined by the Evening Standard’s Anthony France, who was among those prosecuted, and Sir Geoffrey Cox KC, the former Attorney General who successfully defended Sun deputy editor Geoff Webster. The panel will be chaired by me.   This is an unmissable opportunity to hear from those who lived through one of the darkest chapters in recent British journalism and to assess the future of press freedom under a Starmer government.   The event is in central London on Monday 28th April at 7.30pm. In-person tickets can be purchased here, and FSU members can register to attend online using the link provided in the weekly update. The evening will also be recorded.

Rick Prior & The Police Federation of England and Wales Free Speech Union Podcast

That’s Debatable!’ is the weekly podcast of the Free Speech Union. Hosts Tom Harris and Jan MacVarish – both staffers at the FSU – talk about the free speech controversies that have erupted in the past week. Please like, subscribe and share. With the FSU’s support, the Chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation - Rick Prior - is suing his own union after he was ‘cancelled’ for suggesting frontline officers are increasingly nervous about challenging people from ethnic minorities whom they suspect of breaking the law, given the spate of internal investigations into officers accused of being ‘racist’. Following an interview on GB News in October 2024 which led to his suspension, Mr Prior was also locked out of his emails and IT system and told he wasn’t allowed to speak to the press or comment on social media. As reported in The Telegraph and with the backing of the FSU, Mr Prior is taking legal action against the Police Federation of England & Wales and you can support Rick here (https://freespeechunion.org/rickprior/). In other news, on Monday 17th March, the Online Safety Act’s latest phase of duties came into force. They require social media platforms – on pain of massive fines – to identify and remove illegal content. Sites must complete risk assessments detailing how they deal with illegal material and implement safety measures to deal with the risk. The Telegraph reports that dozens of small internet forums have already blocked British users or shut down as new online safety laws come into effect, with one comparing the new regime to a British version of China’s “great firewall”. Interestingly. the importance of internet forums and online anonymity was raised at our ‘From Faith to Faithless’ event last week. When labouring under the pervasive influence of a ‘high control’ religion, anonymous online communication becomes an essential ingredient for those taking their first tentative steps back to the wider world. ‘That's Debatable!’ is edited by Jason Clift.