UK Elections Vote LIBDEM for a EuroControlled Islamic Republic in UK.

Bolton British National party Day of Action Little Lever Bolton

 

Bolton BNP's day of Action in little lever Bolton 

It was a historic day for the Bolton BNP branch as over 12 members joined us in our first table top stall & day of action , we set up in Little Lever to the surprise and delight of the local people, who gave us a very warm welcome. Cars that went by honked their horns and waved at us, and some stopped to take the Freedom paper and leaflets which we were handing out. We set up stall around 9am, and by 12-30pm we had handed out all the papers we had. It just goes to show how much the British public are turning to the BNP, and just how fed up they are of broken promises by all the other party's.

Thursday, 15 April 2010

Welcome to Bolton Patriot a new blog dedicated to keeping Bolton BNP members up to date with what is happening .

Last night saw Arthur Kemp one of the best speakers in the BNP perform a speech where he was given a standing ovation from the many members that had travelled to be there. A total of £850 was raised towards the election campaign and this gives the Bolton group a great start . If any of you have any news you would like posting just send it to boltonbnp@yahoo.co.uk and we will do our best to add the content. Also any photos of leafleting or canvassing would be appreciated. Pictured are our Bolton Parliamentary and metropolitan candidates.

TV Debates All Three Old-Gang Parties Blatantly Ignored The Immigration issue

April 30, 2010 - By BNP News

All three of the old-gang parties blatantly ignored the real immigration issue in last night’s TV debate and the policies they did offer were simply pathetic, said British National Party leader Nick Griffin in his reaction.

“The completely lacklustre performances were marked by collusion, denial of reality and immigration policies which are simply mad and which do nothing to address the real issues,” Mr Griffin said.

“The Lib Dem insanity of declaring an amnesty is so weird and outrageous that even the Labour Party dismissed it, even though Mr Brown’s government has effectively already granted amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants by refusing to track them down,” Mr Griffin said.

“The Points Based System (PBS) has become the mainstay of the Tory and Labour immigration policies,” he continued.

“This PBS was designed by Labour and has been endorsed by the Conservatives, who also say they want to add a cap to the numbers.

“They of course don’t say what that cap is, and, as everyone knows, a cap with no figure is even more useless than a cap with a figure.”

Mr Griffin pointed out however that there were in any event a number of serious flaws in a PBS.

“Official projections are that the population will hit 70 million by 2029, and that 70 percent of this growth will be due to immigration.

“The PBS does nothing to address this issue. Immigration needs to be halted, not encouraged.”

Mr Griffin also pointed out that Britain grants two million entry visas every year, and only 20 percent of these are affected by the PBS.

“This means that the PBS will do nothing to address the issue of illegal immigrants, overstayers or any of the multiple channels of entry into Britain.

“The PBS also removes the immigration officer’s ability to use their discretion when an immigrant arrives at a port of entry.

“Previously, the immigration officer could use their discretion, based on obvious facts, to deny an obviously bogus immigrant entry to Britain. That power has been usurped,” Mr Griffin said.

Furthermore, Government claims of a fall in recent immigration figures since the introduction of the PBS are false. “The only fall has been in net immigration from the EU — which is not subject to the PBS,” Mr Griffin pointed out.

Furthermore, the PBS is open to vast abuse. According to the Government’s own statistics, some 1,800 bogus educational institutions have been closed down since last year’s terrorism arrests on the Merseyside which involved alleged students from Pakistan who had entered the country on visas.

“Apparently there are another 4,000 of such colleges which still need to be checked. These are all institutions which have the power to grant study visas, after which it merely becomes a formality to enter Britain,” Mr Griffin said.

Many of these colleges have been shown to be no more than rooms literally sited above kebab shops.

“These colleges have no interest in bringing skilled people to the UK or ensuring that they depart once again, and are clearly just illegal immigration funnels,” Mr Griffin said.

“Finally, the PBS is complex beyond words. The UK Border Agency website has 800 pages of forms and guidance with potentially 26,000 job titles and thousands of sponsors.

“How on earth is the Home Office expected to cope with that amount of administration, plus appeals which will doubtless follow? It is physically impossible and the civil servants are just being overwhelmed,” Mr Griffin said.

“Despite all of this, both Labour and Tories still pretend that they are doing something about immigration. They are just lying.”

* Mr Griffin also said last night’s debate was marked by a refusal to address Mr Brown’s “bigot” remark the day before.

“No doubt, Nick Clegg and David Cameron kept quiet about it because it also represents their opinion of the electorate, namely that anyone who questions immigration is some type of weird bigot.

“Hence the conspiracy of silence from all of the old-gang parties on what has been the most highlighted remarks of the campaign,” Mr Griffin said.

Lib Lab Con Conmen Hiding the True Extent of Future Tax Rises

April 30, 2010 - By mercia

A leading economic think tank has predicted that income tax will increase in stage to 6 pence in the pound to fund “recovery” — while the Lib-Lab-Con axis of deceit continue to conceal their real plans for massive tax hikes.
It has been revealed in a report by the prestigious National Institute for Economic and Social Research (NIESR) that plans by the establishment parties to make cuts in spending will not be nearly enough to balance the books, meaning that income tax will inevitably have to rise by a huge 6p in the pound.
The timing of the NIESR report could not be worse for Labour and the Tories as it proves that their economic remedy of big, but limited, cuts in public spending is little better than applying a sticking plaster to a gaping wound.
A spokesman for the NIESR explained that increasing debt was, in effect, borrowing from our children and our grandchildren.
He also described Tory and Labour manifesto claims to make savings through “efficiency gains” as “disingenuous.”
Neither parties, incidentally, intend making “efficiency gains” in terms of either refusing pay increases for their MPs nor in accepting pay cuts.
Specifically, Tory proposals to cut some £6 billion more off public spending than Labour will result in the loss of between 30,000 and 60,000 jobs that currently generate tens of millions of pounds in tax revenues for the Exchequer.
Meanwhile, the Institute for Fiscal Studies revealed on Monday that the policy proposals of the establishment parties were wholly deficient in terms of detailing what, exactly, they intended cutting to make the savings claimed.
The British National Party, unlike the failed establishment parties, has laid out in its manifesto its programme for cuts in public spending; cuts which whilst maintaining essential services, such as the NHS, go far beyond anything the corrupt establishment parties are proposing.
These include:
£18 billion by scrapping subsidies and the “green levy” attached to fuel bills in support of the ‘man-made’ global warming scam.
£4 billion by scrapping payments for benefits, housing, support and legal fees made to ‘asylum-seekers’ annually.
£13 billion per year by scrapping all payments, grants and subsidies that fund the imposition of multiculturalism on the people of this country.
£5 billion by pulling out of Afghanistan.
£13 billion annually through scrapping Britain’s grotesque foreign aid budget.
The British National Party — practical policies for economic revival.

I'd Like a Good Public Hanging for Nu LabourTraitors

Created: Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:48 Author: rugfish |  

Whilst the LibLabCon sits on its collective hands in its blatant attempt to destroy British culture, along with its collective one-Marxist-party plan to destroy all opposition too, others take action and bring you news of real events elsewhere.
WASHINGTON — Senator John McCain of Arizona took to the Senate floor the other day to embrace a tough new Arizona law giving the police the authority to detain people they suspect are illegal immigrants. Mr. McCain, long an outspoken champion of giving illegal immigrants a path to citizenship, is facing a primary challenge this summer from a conservative who backs tough immigration measures.
Report continues...MORE
Also, more countries are taking action on immigration:
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) — Mexico warned its citizens living in or traveling to Arizona that they could be “harassed” there because of its new immigration law. The foreign ministry issued a statement saying that Mexicans there should contact their consular representatives if they are unlawfully detained. “Until it is clearly defined under what criteria, when, where and who the authorities will check, you should assume that every Mexican citizen could be harassed and questioned without cause at any moment,” the statement said.
Maybe the UAF need to buy some more hammers and start a campaign in Mexico and the U.S.
Maybe when they get tangled with a semi-automatic from either side of the argument, they might just begin to realise what they have done to Britain already when they are on the way back here and all they see from their UAF banana boats are minarets over Westminster.
Meanwhile, maybe UAF leader David Cameron should re-think his policy that the British people need to learn from third world immigrants who cannot speak a word of English and who him and his party three would have run the country, saying as his political master Obama will undoubtedly be changing his opinion on global Marxism when he sees who he has to confront before, during and after the U.S. Presidential elections.
Oh, incidentally I almost forgot to mention that Tony Blair is close to being indicted for War-crimes.
If anyone wants to follow him then please carry on smashing up my country and its people.
I'd like to see a good public hanging for traitors before they ban rope making

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CIVIL LIBERTIES POLICY PROVEN CORRECT AGAIN !

April 30, 2010 - By BNP News

The British National Party’s civil liberties policy — which includes an explanation for the growth of the totalitarian state — has been proven correct once again after the EU announced that the ban on liquids in air passengers’ hand luggage is to continue for at least another three years.

The ban was brought in after Islamists born in Britain were arrested after planning to blow up a trans-Atlantic aircraft in retaliation for UK foreign policy in the Middle East and the Iraq war in particular.

In 2009 a Woolwich Crown Court jury convicted Abdulla Ahmed Ali, from Walthamstow; Tanvir Hussain, from Leyton; and Assad Sarwar, of High Wycombe, of conspiring to activate bombs disguised as drinks.

The plot was directed from Pakistan by Rashid Rauf, the British-born Al Qaeda mastermind behind the 7 July suicide bombings in London.

Their arrests in August 2006 caused chaos to international aviation and prompted the current restrictions on liquids.

The EU has announced that the restrictions — which have caused major inconvenience to air travellers — will continue until 2013 when mass-screening technology to detect explosives in fluids is perfected.

Currently, all liquids in hand luggage must be in clear containers which contain no more than 100 millilitres and be carried in a single transparent re-sealable plastic bag, which in turn can hold no more than a litre and measures no more than 20 centimetres square.

The BNP’s election manifesto section on civil liberties pointed out the problem under the heading “Terrorism and the Growth of the Totalitarian State.”

The manifesto said the “BNP condemns the erosion of essential democracy in Britain which has developed partly as a result of the increasingly disastrous multicultural experiment.

“Britain today faces domestic terrorism from Islamists as never before in our history — caused directly by the twin policies of mass immigration and a biased Middle Eastern foreign policy.

“On the one hand, the old-gang parties have encouraged mass immigration which has created a large pool of disaffected Muslims in Britain, and on the other hand the same parties have actively pursued aggressive foreign policies which have served to incite the now UK-resident Islamic population.

“The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have provided extra fuel to Islamists seeking to recruit terrorists from the millions-strong Muslim population in Britain.

“In other words, the old parties have created the ‘perfect storm’ for terrorism in Britain — and now used this self-created problem to justify ever-increasing repressive legislation and the destruction of our civil liberties.

“A prime example is the Civil Contingencies Act which grants ministers wide-ranging powers during an emergency, including the right to amend any Act of Parliament except the Human Rights Act.

“Islamist terrorism in Britain will not be stopped by repressive laws, but by dealing with the immigration problem and adopting a neutral foreign policy,” the BNP manifesto said.

The inconvenience to air travellers is but one symptom of this “perfect storm” of Islamist terrorism created by the lib/Lab/Con alliance — and only the BNP has the policy to halt it.

Scotland Yard Most Wanted Immigrants to UK

Scotland Yard’s Latest Most Wanted Illustrates “Benefits of Immigration”

April 28, 2010 - By BNP News

The latest line-up from New Scotland Yard’s “most wanted” list, as released on the Metropolitan Police’s website, is a searing indictment of the highly destructive effect of mass immigration into Britain.

Of the top twelve suspects, only two appear to be British and all the rest are a collection of immigrants from the far corners of the globe, wanted for serious offences such as murder, terrorism and fraud.

Scotland Yard’s most wanted man, Farouk Abdulhak, described as of “Yemeni and Egyptian origins,” is wanted for murder.

Abdulhak was studying at Regents Business School London and is known to have fled to Yemen immediately following the murder.

Number two on the Yard’s list is Latvian Juris Teteris, wanted for armed robbery.

The third most wanted man is Hayman Mustafa, who is being sought for murder. He is described by the Met as being of “Arabic appearance.”

Number four on the most wanted list is Khalid Sageea Hamoud, for bank robbery and breaking bail.

Czech national Daniel Milic is the fifth most wanted man. He is being sought for “complex deceptions involving several victims across the UK,” according to the Met, who helpfully add that he also uses the alias Djordjevic.

The sixth most wanted man is Ibrahim Adam, who is “subject to a Control Order issued under Section 2 Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005.” The Met says that the “subject resides in East London but may have travelled outside London or abroad.”

The seventh most wanted man is Lamine Adam, another Muslim “subject to a Control Order issued under Section 2 Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005.”

The eighth most wanted man is Sukhdip Singh Chhina who is wanted for murder. The Met says he “originates from Amritsar in India.”

Number nine on the list is James Walter Tomkins, one of the two British people on the list. He is wanted for murder.

Number ten on the list is Youseff Ahmed Wahid, wanted for murder. The Met informs us that he “is known to have fled to Beirut” and has “family connections in the USA, Kuwait and across the Arab world.”

Number eleven on the list is the second apparent British person, Aaron McCarthy, who is wanted for robbery.

Number twelve is Ayub Khan, wanted for the double murder of two Sikhs in London. The Met says the murders were carried out in a “controlled and calculated manner” using a machine pistol.

Such are the “benefits of immigration into Britain, as espoused by the Tweedledee and Tweedledum parties.

Artistic Exspression or Just A Racist call for Murder

The Deal Doers VHS Video 0930462300 by LArry Abraham and Gary NorthBNP Legal Officer Lays Criminal Charge after Ghanaian-origin Rap Singer Urges Murder of Nick Griffin

April 28, 2010 - By BNP News

Lethal Bizzle photographed at a concert organised by the Communist Party front organisation “Searchlight” which campaigns against the BNP.

British National Party legal officer Lee Barnes has laid a criminal charge against Ghanaian-origin rap singer “Lethal Bizzle” after he called for Nick Griffin’s murder on Twitter.

Lethal Bizzle, whose real name is Maxwell Ansah, sent out a Twitter message yesterday which read: “Got an idea, u wanna be famous? Kill the BNP leader, u will be a hero.”

Mr Barnes said this was a threat which could not be taken lightly.

“He is linked with black gun gangs in London and this constitutes a serious threat,” Mr Barnes said.

The Serious Crime Act 2007, section 45 states that a person commits an offence if:

(a)he does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and

(b)he believes–

(i)that the offence will be committed; and

(ii)that his act will encourage or assist its commission.

“Mr Ansah’s twitter is clearly an incitement to serious violence against Nick Griffin,” Mr Barnes said.

“Imagine if a threat like that had been issued by Mr Griffin against Mr Ansah. The BNP leader would have been arrested within minutes, but it seems that black rappers are somehow protected.”

* A sample of Lethal Bizzle’s lyrics from one of his recent collection of jungle noises (which the controlled media calls “music”) reveals all that is needed to know about the nature of Mr Ansah:

“I’ll crack your scull

leave u fucked up in da wheel chair

if u

try 2 clash this evil breeh

rude bwoy fi just seckle

don’t let jamakabi ga draw fi d metal

not d gun

me draw for d belt buckle

I mek a bigga boy feel say im likkle

just swing my belt roun like a num chukal

bus u head

n mek your head n mek you blood start trickle.” — Lethal Bizzle, lyrics to “POW.”

Mr Barnes will keep readers updated as to the progress of this case.

Contempt with which Gordon Brown and the Labour Party hold the British public

“Old Bigot” Gaffe: BNP to Launch Advertising Campaign to Focus Voters’ Attention on Contempt with which the Establishment Holds for the public

April 28, 2010 - By BNP News

The British National Party has announced its plans to launch a last minute newspaper advertising campaign in key areas to focus voter attention on the contempt with which Gordon Brown and the Labour Party hold the public, as revealed by the “bigot” gaffe, Nick Griffin MEP has announced.

Reacting to the off camera remark by Mr Brown after he was questioned by a lifelong Labour voter in Rochdale in which he dismissed the woman as an old “bigot,” Mr Griffin said none of the questions which the person had asked could in any way be remotely classed as bigotry.

“She asked some very sensible questions about taxation on pensions and the immigration problem,” Mr Griffin said.

“For Mr Brown to have then dismissed her as a bigot just because she asked him about immigration shows the utter contempt with which the Labour Party regards even their own voters,” he said.

“The poor woman did not use any epithets and simply asked why he was not doing anything about immigration. There was no justification at all to dismiss her in the derogative way he did.

“Furthermore, the admission that all of Mr Brown’s interactions are stage managed explains at last why his previous public appearances are almost always with children and not adults.

“Children cannot ask the sort of pointed questions which adults can, and when Mr Brown was presented with an unscripted questioner, he immediately revealed his true agenda,” Mr Griffin said.

“Furthermore, the fact that Mr Brown used the adjective ‘old’ to describe the voter, shows that there is a clear disregard for people who have spent a lifetime voting Labour,” Mr Griffin continued.

“This puts the deaths of an estimated 40,000 pensioners from fuel poverty over the past winter into perspective. Clearly these people do not matter anymore to the ruling elite.

“In law, if you do something that has consequences, you are liable even if you did not intend that result. This is the basis of manslaughter.

“Mr Brown and his Tory colleagues are directly responsible for the stagnant pensions and the growth of profit-driven energy supply utilities, both of which have combined to make a devil’s brew whereby heating has become unaffordable for many old people.

“It would seem that Mr Brown’s dismissal of the ‘old bigot’ today is perfectly in line with this attitude,” Mr Griffin said.

“This gaffe may well have sealed Mr Brown’s fate forever. Already I have had reports back from BNP canvassers out this afternoon and evening of voters’ total disgust with Mr Brown’s remarks.

“The BNP will be launching a newspaper advertising campaign to focus voters’ attention on this shocking state of affairs. Our target areas are going to be Barking and Dagenham, Leicester, Stoke-on-Trent, Manchester and Barnsley,” Mr Griffin said.

Revealed: Why No One Was Prosecuted for College Green Attack on Nick Griffin

April 28, 2010 - By BNP News

The Metropolitan Police failed to hand over a dossier on the College Green attack on Nick Griffin to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) within the required six month period, which resulted in no prosecutions being launched, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request has revealed.

The FOI request was submitted by British National Party sleazebuster and parliamentary candidate for Dagenham and Rainham, Mick Barnbrook, after video and photographic evidence emerged clearly showing UAF thugs throwing missiles and darts at the BNP leader.

“As a former Met Police inspector, I was astonished that no one had even been charged for this obvious criminal act,” Mr Barnbrook told BNP news.

“I submitted an FOI request to the CPS asking them for their reasons why no prosecutions had followed.

“Their answer was that no charges were brought because the Met Police submitted the papers to the CPS too late,” Mr Barnbrook said.

“There are only two possible explanations for this travesty: incompetence or maliciousness. I suspect the latter,” he added.

The CPS explanation is directly contradictory to the explanation given by the police to Mr Griffin.

“When I asked the police why there had been no prosecution, they told me that the CPS has advised them there was little or no chance of success,” Mr Griffin told BNP News.

“Either the CPS or the police are lying, one of the two. I suppose we should not expect better from the politically correct Labour and Tory slaves who ultimately control these decisions,” he said.

* In a separate but related FOI request, Mr Barnbrook also extracted an admission from the police that the UAF did not have permission to have their counter demonstration near Parliament.

“The law states very clearly that anyone who holds a demonstration near Parliament ipso facto commits an offence,” Mr Barnbrook said.

“Despite the Met admitting this in writing, they still have not charged anyone in the UAF with holding that demonstration.

“One can only imagine how quickly they would have arrested BNP members demonstrating without permission outside Parliament. Once again, it seems that there are two sets of laws: one for indigenous Britons and another for those who attack British people,” Mr Barnbrook said.

Press Statement from British National Party Candidates

HERE IS A PRESS STATEMENT FROM YOU BOLTON BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CANDIDATES IGNORED BY THE LOCAL MEDIA! SO WE ISSUE IT DIRECT TO YOU AND OTHER PARTIES!
Press Statement from
British National Party Candidates,
Bolton Metropolitan Council & general Elections 2010,

Subject,

Cross party Pledge,

We in the British National Party have no links what so ever with the English Defence League, and do not condone their tactics of mass rallies but we feel that in a Democratic country, all British patriotic groups have a right to peacefully voice their concerns at the devaluing of the British Way of life, culture and heritage, with out the fear of violence and intimidation by the Unite Against Fascism group!

So would all the parliamentary and local Bolton Borough Candidates in the forthcoming elections for the Bolton Metropolitan area, agree with the Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan, from Greater Manchester Police (GMP), who accused UAF (Unite against Fascism) supporters and of deliberately inciting violence and attacking officers. At the EDL rally in March, And is quoted as saying. (The Independent 22/03/10)
"We have seen groups of people, predominantly associated with the UAF, engaging in violent confrontation," he said. "It is clear to me that a large number have attended with the sole intention of committing disorder and their actions have been wholly unacceptable. They acted with, at times, extreme violence and their actions led to injuries to police officers, protesters and members of the public.
"The police are not and should not be the target of such violence and anger, and this protest and the actions of some of the protesters is roundly condemned by GMP and by Bolton Council."
Although it states it that Bolton council condemns the violent tactics of the Left wing UAF, We feel it would be for the benefit of the electorate of The Bolton Metropolitan area to know that along with all the British National Party Candidates in the forthcoming Bolton elections, That all the other parties candidates Strongly condemn the violent tactics and actions of the UAF and their affiliated groups. And that the right of free speech and assembly for all to protest should not be subject to violent intimidation and violence no matter how strongly the opposition disagree with their opponents views.
End Statement,

NU LABOURS BROWNS CONTEMPT FOR THE BRITISH PEOPLE

Once again the Nu Labour Marxist elite in the person of it,s leader Gordon Brown have shown the contempt for the White working class British people, it is now a fact that they view all of us as bigots for expressing concerns over how our Nation and NHS services are being over stretched by immigrants both illegal and legitimate. The insult is made even more worse by the fact that the Mrs Duffy was a Labour supporter. How much longer must the British people just stand back and be treated with such contempt by the Political establishment , and by that I mean not only the Nu Labour Party but the Liberal & Conservative parties also. We are a people under the threat of complete destruction of not just our culture & religion but as a race as well from these closet inverse racists that now frequent the corridors of power. 

there is only one alternative to save us from these Monsters in the forthcoming elections on May the 6th and that is the, BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY , Not just for the next 4 years but for the survival of our nation and it,s people,  
VOTE FOR

 


FULL TRANSCRIPT  OF THE INCIDENT. 
Duffy: We had it drummed in when I was a child with mine … it was education, health service and looking after the people who are vulnerable. But there's too many people now who are vulnerable but they can claim and people who are vulnerable can't get claim, can't get it.
Brown: But they shouldn't be doing that, there is no life on the dole for people any more. If you are unemployed you've got to go back to work. It's six months.
Duffy: You can't say anything about the immigrants because you're saying that you're … but all these eastern European what are coming in, where are they flocking from?
Later, as he was leaving
Brown: Very good to meet you, and you're wearing the right colour today. Ha, ha, ha: How many grandchildren do you have?
Duffy: Two. They've just got back from Australia where they got stuck for 10 days. They couldn't get back with this ash crisis.
Brown: We've been trying to get people back quickly. Are they going to university. Is that the plan?
Duffy: I hope so. They're only 12 and 10.
Brown: Are they're doing well at school? [pats Duffy on the back] A good family, good to see you. It's very nice to see you.
In the car
Brown: That was a disaster. Well I just ... should never have put me in that woman. Whose idea was that?
Aide: I don't know, I didn't see.
Brown: It was Sue [Nye] I think. It was just ridiculous.
Aide: I'm not sure if they [the media] will go with that.
Brown: They will go with that.
Aide: What did she say?
Brown: Oh everything, she was just a sort of bigoted woman. She said she used be LABOUR. I mean it's just ridiculous.

Marxist Teachers Go Public & Intefere in Democratic Process

This is NOW a fight like no other fight before it

THE National Union of Teachers (NUT) is trying to stop the BNP gaining more council seats in the upcoming elections by leafleting homes across the city. Dozens of union members and other volunteers targeted homes in the Stoke, Trent Vale, Hartshill and Penkhull areas yesterday . Jason Hill, president of the union's Stoke-on-Trent branch, said: "From our perspective as teachers, we are very concerned about the fact the BNP has a number of school governorships in the city and we don't want them to get any more. "We believe having BNP members as governors is incompatible with the values we are supposed to hold as teachers." The NUT's day of action was linked to a wider protest against the far-right party, which was organised by the North Staffordshire Campaign Against Racism and Fascism and Unite Against Fascism. Other areas which have been leafleted in recent weeks include Bentilee and Abbey Green.

Make no mistake, the British National Party is doing extremely well, both politically, financially and in its growing membership.
There is no doubt about this at all, but you will not hear it in the news or see it discussed on television.
The reason I know that our strength is growing immensely is primarily because I hear and see it myself, and because I can also see for myself what the government and the LibLabCon are doing in their fruitless, hectic and undemocratic attempts to make the British public believe that it is us rather than them who are EVIL.
Please don't confuse the word evil with me being religious because I declared a long time ago, my lifelong support for truth which I could myself validate.
Therefore I am an agnostic in terms of belief in diety and I am also a Christian and I recognise that my Christian principles of tolerance have been taken advantage of by Marxists.
Marxists have infiltrated the LibLabCon and they are evil in their unceasing global desire to break nations.
The LibLabCon and YOUR GOVT , has engaged The Teachers Union to drop Marxist propaganda through letterboxes in Britain.
In any other country bar Zimbabwe, this would be a criminal offence but not here in Zanu-Britain.
Poor people along with their unsuspecting children, are being subjected to political propaganda in our schools, our colleges, our universities and our work places, and we are now being harassed in our homes by Marxists who are bent on Global domination.
The National Union of Teachers [NUT's] has an appropriate name.
They are clearly nuts, but thankfully at this time they are not completely nuts.
I personally know teachers who tell me they remain quiet about their support of the British National Party and for British democracy because they live and work in fear of losing their jobs.
I hear it, and I see it and yet for obvious reasons I cannot tell you who these people are.
Now like GA today, I am not going to provide links here because by now, if YOU are too stupid and lazy to have found the truth out yourself, then YOU DESERVE TO HAVE YOUR COUNTRY AND YOUR WAY OF LIFE - DESTROYED - BY THESE MAD NUTTERS WE HAVE IN POLITICS - IN GOVT - IN UNIONS - AND IN SOCIETY IN GENERAL.
These nutters were once locked away in asylums but now they have taken over our country.
Marxists have used nutters to shift blame to and to divert the public eye, but make no mistake that the government, David Cameron, trades unions, former Militant the Socialist Workers Party, Hope Not Hate, Searchlight, the Black Police Association, and many more groups such as Common Purpose and the Fabian Society along with Nothing British, have been eating up your taxes, telling the people lies, brainwashing your children, threatening those who resist them, and making laws against you solely to destroy your ability to resist them.
YOU ALONE CAN MAKE THE DIFFERENCE!
The ONLY way this time is to vote for the British National Party but there are indeed many other ways to regain control of our country notleast full blown revolution and war which will eventually occur quite naturally as larger numbers of people discover that their lands have been infested by self-serving anti-British Globalists and by other alien ideologues.
I am predicting that these Marxists will not release power through the ballot box.
I am predicting that yet again they will commit fraud at the ballot box.
I am predicting that people like me will still be here, next time with the links as future truths becomes known, I will be here to prove the next round of fraud being committed against our nation, and I will still be here giving truth along with my opinion well after the Marxists have completely ruined the British political system.
Nothing will stop me speaking the truth, and nothing will make me shut up except death.
People like me will never give up and people like me will one day be ready to take up arms against Marxists if they continue to harm my people and my country.
People like them who took away our democracy, our culture, our sovereignty and our right to protest unfettered by Marxist traitors who call themselves TEACHERS and 'anti-Fascists', will not win this land for their evil dream.
Right now I am declaring my readiness to fight against any government which seeks the destruction of the beliefs I hold and which I know are shared by many millions of others.
Right now I am declaring my belief that one day I will have no other choice unless something politically can change the Marxists who are currently in control of my country.
Right now I am declaring that this country is no longer under the control of democrats but that it is a communist state which I am morally and legally bound to resist.

I ask one question:
Why is the government not banning interference in the electoral process by people who are not standing as political candidates?

Bognor Regis Civic Society Condemns Labour, Tory and Lib Dems

Bognor Regis Civic Society Condemns Labour, Tory and Lib Dems for Refusing to Debate BNP

April 27, 2010 - By BNP News

The BNP's Andrew Moffat.

The impartial community Bognor Regis Civic Society (CiViC) has taken the unprecedented step of formally condemning the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties for being too scared to debate the British National Party at an election hustings.

“The Parliamentary class is already loathed and regarded with contempt by the voters,” said BNP candidate in the Bognor Regis and Littlehampton constituency, Andrew Moffat.

“First there was the MPs’ expenses scandal. Now, they refuse to subject themselves to the scrutiny of their own voters and debate the real issues in open forum,” Mr Moffat said.

“This is an outrage of unprecedented disrespect and demonstrates disgraceful manners against the organisers,” he said.

“It is quite clear they were not prepared to discuss mass immigration and the imposition of the multicultural society, the Iraq and Afghan wars, or the EU, all in respect of which there has been no democratic consent or consultation whatsoever.

“I further suspect that local MP Nick Gibb did not want to have his parliamentary expenses scrutinised by his voters and I had hoped to raise this. That provided an added incentive for him to run away.

“Clearly, there is no difference between the Lab/Lib/Con on the major issues. They are all the same and all to blame,” Mr Moffat said.

“If they had an issue, they should have debated it in open forum instead of running away. That is the democratic way of doing things. These pompous candidates have shown unprecedented contempt for their own voters.

The meeting went ahead with the three remaining candidates and there was much constructive debate and questioning.

The organisers of CiViC condemned the three absent candidates to much applause. At the end of the evening, a vote was taken to issue a formal rebuke to each of the candidates and, but for two exceptions, was supported by all present.

Lib Dem Candidate Reveals His Party’s “Mongrel Nation” View

Lib Dem Candidate Reveals His Party’s “Mongrel Nation” Vision for Britain

April 27, 2010 - By BNP News

Liberal Democrats are ignorant and hate Britain, says BNP’s Danny Seabrook.

The Liberal Democrat hatred of British people has been revealed with comments made by their St Albans candidate that they see Britain as a “mongrel nation,” says Danny Seabrook, British National Party candidate in Hertsmere.

In an interview with pupils of St Albans School as part of a BBC project, Lib Dem candidate Sandy Walkington said: “We’ve always as a country been strongest when we have welcomed immigration, and we are all mongrels.

“This is the most mongrel country in the world.

“In 200 years time, we’ll all be coffee coloured, and I welcome that,” Mr Walkington said.

“The remarks are utterly disgraceful and are the clearest indication yet that the Lib Dems have an utterly twisted world view and even outright hatred for British people,” Mr Seabrook said.

“Quite apart from the sheer hatefulness of calling British people ‘mongrels,’ which is a term most often used for dogs, Mr Walkington has also displayed his appalling ignorance and stupidity on the topic of the ancestry of British people,” Mr Seabrook continued.

“All educated people know that the historical, archaeological and genetic evidence has proven beyond any doubt that up to 80 percent of the indigenous people of the British Isles have been here at least since the end of the last Ice Age, circa 14,000 years ago, and many from even before then.

“Even the most ‘recent’ large-scale settlements from continental Europe, namely the Saxons and Vikings, arrived in Britain around 1,500 years ago and each individual group only make up less than five percent each of the British people,” Mr Seabrook continued.

“Compare this history to the Maori people of New Zealand, who are internationally recognised as the indigenous folk of that land.

“The Maoris have been in New Zealand for 730 years — and I am sure Mr Walkington and his party would not call those people mongrels or deny that they are indigenous.

“The BNP is the only party to stand unequivocally for the rights of the indigenous people of Britain and their right to remain the majority population of this island,” Mr Seabrook said.

Recommended reading: Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Britain (DNA, History and the Right to Existence of the Native Inhabitants of the British Isles).

Contrary to what the liberal left Tory/Labour/Lib-Dem/UKIP-EHRC allege, the native people of the British Isles are a distinct, identifiable and homogenous indigenous people who have every right to exist and be free from invasion and domination — like any other indigenous people on earth.

This booklet proves that the vast majority of the British people have ancestors going back to the last mini ice age more than 12,000 years ago.

Table of contents:

1. Introduction (Deals with the denial of indigenous status to the British people)

2. Indigenous People — A Definition (uses UN and other definitions)

3. Haplogroups and the Genetic Identification of Peoples (explains Y-Chromosomes, mtDNA and Autosomal DNA in detail, and how they are used in forensics and history to identify and track peoples to specific areas)

4. The Haplogroups Which Mark the Indigenous People of Britain (explains which haplogroups are indigenous to Britain)

5. A History of the Peopling of Britain (a potted history of the people who have made up Britain through settlement, i.e. Euro base population, Celts, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Danes, Normans — including figures on actual numbers of settlers and their genetic impact as measured by haplogroup)

6. Four Flags, One Nation: The right of the people of the British Isles to existence and freedom from colonisation, domination and dispossession of their lands and culture.

* Genetic evidence shows that the vast majority — nearly 80% — of all British people have ancestors going back to the end of the last mini ice age 12,000 years ago;

* Genetic evidence shows that the Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Viking/Danish and Norman conquests had negligible impacts upon the British people (less than 5 percent each);

* Genetic evidence shows that the Irish people have far more in common with the British than both sides of that traditional divide realise.

* The people of the British Isles have been indigenous peoples for far longer than many other nations who are already classified as “indigenous” by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

This booklet also shows how the indigenous people of Britain are fully protected by the United Nations Charter on Indigenous Peoples from “dispossession of their territory” through “mass population transfers” and from “forced integration and assimilation” and “destruction of their identity and culture” (all according to the United Nations).

Even more importantly, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states that all indigenous peoples have the right to define who is part of their nation and who is not.

Has the Leader of the Bolton Liberal Democrats Got A Secret?

HAS THE LEADER OF THE BOLTON LIBERAL DEMOCRATS SECRETLY CONVERTED TO ISLAM?

In a recent story in the Bolton Evening News about the Leader of the Bolton Liberal Democrats Cllr Roger Hayes (Political leader's sex den smear fury, BEN 27/04/10 Cllr Hayes stated that his partner possibly his wife Jaleh was a Muslim. So it is well known that according to Islamic teachings and law that only a Muslim man can marry a Muslim woman, 

 So we believe in it is the Public interest, not only to non Muslims but also the Muslim population of Bolton has Cllr Hayes converted to Islam and if so why has been failed to mention it.

 Also he should make his possible conversion public on the grounds that in his role on the Stronger Communities Partnership with Bolton Council a future accusation of preferential treatment on the grounds of religious bias could be avoided, if deciding on a issue that involved a religious theme.  

Also I am sure that many ordinary Muslim residents of Bolton  would be interested in the matter and may consider it showing a lack of sensitivity towards their faith and beliefs if he has not converted to Islam whilst marrying a Muslim woman whilst serving on the Stronger Communities Partnership Bolton Council, a body that is alleged to bring the beliefs of all communities to each others attentions in order to stop any cultural misunderstandings, as it seems to me that Cllr Hayes has thrown a slap across the face to Islamic beliefs if he has not become a Muslim himself, whilst living with a lady of Muslim beliefs.

I am sure that Cllrs Hayes would like to clear the matter up as it is impossible for his Partner/Wife to become a Christian or an atheist or live together as it was once called living in sin , as that would unfortunately carry a why-muslim-women-cant-marry-non-muslim-men/  “The marriage of a Christian man to Muslim women is an invalid marriage. Allah says in the Koran”. And also some Islamic scholars have issued Fatwa’s claiming that through such a marriage Cllrs Hayes Partner/Wife would become an apostate which carry the death sentence within Islam.

Enoch Powell's Prophetic Rivers of Blood' speech

This is the full text of Enoch Powell's so-called 'Rivers of Blood' speech, which was delivered to a Conservative Association meeting in Birmingham on April 20 1968.

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.
Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."
Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.
At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country." I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.
In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's Office.
There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.
As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.
The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.
The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.
It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.
Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.
I stress the words "for settlement." This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.
I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.
Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.
Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.
Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.
The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens." This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.
There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.
The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.
Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.
Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another's.
But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.
They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.
In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.
I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:
“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.
“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her 'phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying rates, she has less than £2 per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, "Racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country." So she went home.
“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist," they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”
The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration." To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.
Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.
But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.
We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate.
Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:
'The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.'
All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.
For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood."
That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.
Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.