Search This Blog

Sunday 25 September 2022

HOW THEY PULLED OFF THE 'PANDEMIC' - AN ANIMATED FILM EXPLANATION

 

We release this free of copyright and so please share, download and post wherever you can.

 Let's make this go globally viral.

The Answer is available now at https://shop.davidicke.com/product/the-answer-by-david-icke/

We live in extraordinary times with billions bewildered and seeking answers for what is happening.

 David Icke, the man who has been proved right again and again, has spent 30 years uncovering

 the truth behind world affairs and in a stream of previous books he predicted current events.
The Answer will change your every perception of life and the world and set you free of the illusions

 that control human society. There is nothing more vital for our collective freedom than humanity 

becoming aware of what is in this book.
Orders Shipped from Friday 7th August – Release Date – Friday 14th August. Get it here first…

Monday 19 September 2022

The Frankfurt Declaration ,The Christian Declaration of Rights

 

The Frankfurt Declaration


Christians around the world were stunned by the reaction of much of the Church to the unhinged, authoritarian response of governments around the world to Covid-19 and the subsequent global medical experiment performed on millions of people. Whilst churches were forced to shut for the longest period in history, businesses were made to close for no good reason, and people were mandated to cover the most visible expression of the Image of God — their faces — with useless, dehumanising bits of cloth, most of the Church was at best silent. When an experimental gene therapy product which can never complete its clinical trials was mandated at the cost of people’s jobs, reputations and livelihoods, most of the Church was at best silent. When that medical experiment was demonstrably seen to be injuring or killing huge numbers of people across the globe, most of the Church was at best silent.

Too many Christians assumed that the state had both a medical and a moral right to act as it did. On the first point, it was clear from the outset that those measures and restrictions were both unscientific and unnecessary, yet few in the church were willing to ask the questions that should have been asked. On the second point, the result was that the state took on an authority that it does not possess to regulate what can and can’t be done in worship, with much of the church apparently happy to go along with this.

That the church responded in this way is troubling enough; that few lessons have been learned — much less repentance — is even more concerning. However, wherever there is mass conformity to totalitarianism, there will always be some who emerge to challenge it, rebuke it, and shine a light in the darkness. It thrills us to report that such a statement has now emerged.

 

The Frankfurt Declaration of Christian and Civil Liberties is a thoroughly biblical and sound theological response to the authoritarianism and folly that has been thrust upon us, and it will hopefully serve as a wake-up call to those sections of the Church which went along with what was undoubtedly the biggest mass propaganda event in the history of the world. The purpose of the Declaration is set out in the preamble as follows:

‘A few concerned pastors from different continents, moved by an emergent totalitarianism of the State over all realms of society, and particularly the Church, and the disregard of God-given and constitutionally guaranteed rights during the Covid crisis, joined in common cause to craft a solemn declaration, which seeks to address these threats with the timeless truths of God’s Word. The following affirmations and denials, derived from biblical principles, we put forth for consideration by all Christians and relevant authorities, in the hope that this document will give light and strength for faithful witness to Jesus Christ in our day.’

The Declaration contains five short Articles, summarised below:

Article 1: God the Creator as sovereign lawgiver and judge

That God, not personal matter is the ultimate source of all things which means — amongst other things — that no earthly authority has the right to ‘define morality and require unconditional obedience to their citizens when contrary to his law’.

Article 2: God as the source of truth and the role of science

That the existence of the transcendent God is the basis for objective truth, and that science which seeks to discover this objective truth through the scientific method and debate should be endorsed, whilst that which seeks to assert truths on the basis of an alleged ‘scientific consensus’, which silences the concerns and objections of dissenting voices, and which uses fearmongering and propaganda to coerce people into submission to its dogmas, should be rejected.

Article 3: Mankind as the image of God

That humans are made in the Imago Dei, which means they have certain unalienable rights, such as the right to maintain in-person relationships, pursue lawful vocations, attend worship services, gather in public places, and be physically present at life events such as weddings and funerals, all of which the state has no authority to interfere in, nor to enforce medical coercion such as social distancing, mask mandates and vaccines.

Article 4: God-given mandates and the limits of authority

That the state’s God-given mandate is to reward good, punish evil, and to protect the God-given rights and freedoms granted to all people, and that any claim it might have to authority over all of life, including the other spheres of government which derive their authority from God (church and family), is totalitarian and must be rejected.

Article 5: Christ as the Head of the Church

That the Head of the Church is Jesus Christ, who alone governs and regulates essential acts of worship, such that any attempts to relegate worship to the area of non-essential, or to criminalise, inhibit or regulate acts of worship are to be rejected.

What particularly pleasing about this is that it is not just a ‘Christian’ or ‘Church’ declarationin a narrow sense. Rather, it recognises God’s sovereignty over all of life, not just in matters pertaining to worship, but in things like the God-given right of every person to go about their lawful business unhindered; the God-given right to take our own medical decisions; and the God-given right to meet others in person, face to face. Sadly, much of the Church has imbibed the notion that these issues are none of its business, since they are apparently not ‘Gospel issues’, yet the hindering of a person from opening his or her lawful business, for example, is actually a form of theft, and thus a ‘righteousness issue’, which is every bit the Church’s concern.

With the globalist elites moving on with their ‘You’ll own nothing and be happy’ vision of the future, this theft and authoritarianism is set to continue and expand, and those who think we are going to revert to normal are not reading the narrative. There is more to come, and Christians need to be wise to it and know how to respond. This is why this declaration is so timely and important, since it sets out the theological parameters for knowing how to understand and respond to what is happening.

It can be read and signed online at https://frankfurtdeclaration.com/ and we hope that both Christians and non-Christians will take the time to read it. May it by used by God to give His people theological clarity, understanding of the times, and the resolve to stand fast in the face of the Godless global totalitarianism taking shape around us.

Sunday 18 September 2022

IT'S A BIG CLUB AND YOU AIN'T IN IT! DAVID ICKE DOT-CONNECTOR VIDEOCAST

 


PART 3: WHAT THE MEDIA WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT KING CHARLES

 

Part 3.
There... now you know the FULL truth!

PART 2: WHAT THE MEDIA WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT KING CHARLES III

 

This is part 2 of what the media won't tell you about King Charles III. This video goes 
into his philanthropic, altruistic (totally nothing to see here) efforts with the World Economic Forum.

PART 1: WHAT THE MEDIA WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT KING CHARLES III

 

PART 1 OF What the Media Won't Tell You About KING CHARLES III
After Queen Elizabeth II's passing, Prince Charles became King Charles III, and even if you aren't
 under the crown, here are the things you need to know about him! Here's what 
the media won't tell you about King Charles III.
Read more here

Saturday 17 September 2022

Exposed: The ‘97% of scientists agree with manmade global warming’ lie

 Exposed: The ‘97% of scientists agree with manmade global warming’ lie

OUR government is imposing draconian limitations on our lifestyles, our economy and our finances to save the planet from supposed catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW), now renamed ‘climate change’.  Probably one of the most repeated arguments you’ll hear in support of the need to achieve ‘net zero’ is that ’97 per cent of scientists agree CAGW is happening’.

President Obama is just one of many who have made this claim: ‘Ninety-seven per cent of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.’

So did President Biden’s Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, John Kerry, when he warned of the ‘crippling consequences’ of climate change and said: ‘Ninety-seven per cent of the world’s scientists tell us this is urgent.’ 

Yet, in spite of the damaging effects reaching ‘net zero’ will have on Western economies, not a single politician or mainstream journalist seems to have made the effort to find out where this ‘97 per cent’ figure came from and how accurate it is.

The main author of the paper which came up with the figure was John Cook, an Australian former web programmer and blogger who later gained a PhD in philosophy at the University of Western Australia and founded what could be seen as a climate alarmist website.

He assembled a group of volunteers recruited via the website as part of a ‘citizen science’ project and tasked them with examining the abstracts of 11,944 climate papers from 1991-2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. Note that the volunteers didn’t speak to any scientists and didn’t read the scientific papers. They just looked at the abstracts – a summary paragraph or two. The volunteers classified the abstracts into one of seven categories according to their opinions of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW):

1.      Explicit endorsement of AGW with quantification

2.      Explicit endorsement of AGW without quantification

3.      Implicit endorsement of AGW

4.      No position or Uncertain

5.      Implicit rejection of AGW

6.      Explicit rejection of AGW without quantification

7.      Explicit rejection of AGW with quantification

The reviewers then ‘simplified’ results into four main categories as follows:

Endorse AGW               3,896                   32.6 per cent of abstracts

No AGW position         7,930                   66.4 per cent of abstracts

Reject AGW                  78                         0.7 per cent of abstracts

Uncertain on AGW      40                         0.3 per cent of abstracts

This gave 32.6 per cent of abstracts which the reviewers concluded endorsed AGW.

Now comes the clever bit. Instead of admitting that just 32.6 per cent of papers (actually just abstracts of papers) endorsed AGW, the group removed the 7,930 abstracts which didn’t take a position on AGW. That left just 4,014 abstracts of which 3,896 (97 per cent) supposedly ‘endorsed’ AGW.

This is like doing a survey of the voting intentions of 1,000 people. You find that 90 say they’ll vote Labour, 10 say they’ll vote Conservative and the remaining 900 are undecided. You eliminate the 900 undecideds and claim that 90 per cent of voters support Labour and just 10 per cent of voters will vote Conservative. This is, of course, complete statistical nonsense as the real percentage of the sampled 1,000 voters who have said they will vote Labour is 9 per cent, not 90 per cent.

That’s not the end of the magic employed to reach that wondrous 97 per cent. The reviewers lumped together three categories of abstracts – ‘explicit endorsement with quantification’, ‘explicit endorsement without quantification’ and ‘implicit endorsement’. (Implicit endorsement means that the reviewer felt that the paper endorsed the AGW theory even though the paper didn’t do so explicitly).

In the paper claiming 97 per cent support for AGW, the reviewers don’t tell us how many papers fitted into each of these three categories, but the survey’s own database shows that of the 3,896 abstracts which supposedly ‘endorsed’ AGW, just 64 were in the ‘explicit endorsement with quantification’ category; 922 were in the ‘explicit endorsement without quantification’ and the vast majority – 2,910 out of 3,896 – were in the ‘implicit endorsement of AGW’ category.

Thus only 986 of 11,944 – that’s just 8.2 per cent – of abstracts explicitly said they agreed with the theory of man-made global warming.

To summarise, this ‘97 per cent of scientists’ claim was based on the work of 11 to 12 volunteers, whose scientific credentials have not (as far as I know) been released and all of whom were probably firm AGW believers. Each looked at around 1,000, often quite obscure, scientific abstracts and from these documents decided whether the scientific papers (which they hadn’t read) supported the AGW theory. To claim such an approach is statistically valid is beyond farcical. To call the ‘97 per cent of scientists endorse AGW’ result ‘garbage’ could be seen as insulting to garbage.

Given the damage ‘net zero’ will do to our economies and our lives, it is incredible that not a single politician, mainstream journalist or editor seems to have had the ability or the inclination to expose the dubious origins of the ubiquitous ‘97 per cent of scientists endorse AGW’ claim.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Sunday 11 September 2022

Nick Griffin Templar Report Sept 2022

 

Crusade for America: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/crusade_for_america_fundraiser
Crusade for America Volunteer Pack: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/crusade_for_america_volunteer
Book of Common Prayer: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/book_of_common_prayer
New Clothing launched on our store: https://www.templarstore.com/

Templar Military Package: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/templar_military_package
Great Reset Resistance Mission Outreach: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/outreach

Templar War Axe: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/templar_war_axe
Gurkha Regimental Kukri: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/gurkha_regimental_kukri
Don't miss out! KTI Crypto: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/crypto-mining

Secure your place in Magdalene Chapel: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/magdalene_chapel

You can now donate via bitcoin: 15K7WVhpGBWJqqv6q6vaLcNvePuygdhcSk

Members can join our discord: https://discord.gg/NPGWbZh
Follow us on telegram: https://t.me/KnightsTemplarOfficial

Thou shalt not dissent - Irreverend Episode Faith and Current Affairs

Sept 2022 PLEASE NOTE - This episode was recorded before the sad death of Queen Elizabeth II. Our condolences are with Her Majesty's family and all who mourn. We will certainly discuss our great monarch's passing on next week's show. May her soul rest in peace with God after her long years of devoted service. Church of England reverends Daniel French and Jamie Franklin sit down to talk about the big things in our culture and the church. Today, a discussion on anger and forgiveness for one's enemies, retrospective on Lockdown in the light of the new Frankfurt Declaration (https://frankfurtdeclaration.com ), Liz Truss becomes Prime Minister and "controversial" Roman Catholic Therese Coffey becomes Health Secretary, the Rev'd Dr Bernard Randall looks to his diocese for support after being fired from his post at Trent College for promoting Anglican doctrine - guess what happened next?, will the CofE continue to support the Net Zero agenda when pensioners start freezing in the dark this Winter because of it?, and we revisit the question of whether or not there is a moral way of refusing to pay exorbitant energy bills. That and much much more on this episode of Irreverend: Faith and Current Affairs! TO SUPPORT THE SHOW please see: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/irreverend and https://www.patreon.com/irreverend. Find these details and more at https://irreverendpod.com. Links: Therese Coffey's "controversial" voting record on abortion and gay marriage: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022... Bernard Randall is "a danger to children": https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti... Notices: Find links to our episodes, social media accounts and ways to support us at https://www.irreverendpod.com! Thursday Circles: http://thursdaycircle.com Jamie's Good Things Substack: https://jamiefranklin.substack.com Irreverend Sermon Audio: https://irreverendsermonaudio.buzzspr...

Saturday 10 September 2022

Neil Oliver – one rule for us & one rule for them!’


Sept 2022 …hypocrisy is all around...we’re constantly being preached at by the rich, the famous & the powerful… To see this episode in full & get exclusive access to new content every week sign up to 'Neil Oliver' on Patreon.com https://www.patreon.com/neiloliver Audio Podcasts, Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World &, Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast... Check out the Series Instagram account: Neil Oliver Love Letter https://www.instagram.com/neiloliverl...