Search This Blog

Thursday, 11 December 2025

They still don’t understand what’s happening

 They still don’t understand what’s happening.

By Andrew Torba 

Visit gab.com 



For decades—generations, really—they controlled everything that mattered. They controlled the universities and the publishing houses. They controlled Hollywood and the news media. They controlled the HR departments and the professional associations. They built an entire infrastructure of acceptable opinion, a vast machine designed to manufacture consent and punish dissent. Anyone who stepped outside the approved boundaries found themselves unemployed, unpublished, and unpersoned. The system worked beautifully for a long time. It created the illusion of consensus, the feeling that “everyone” agreed on certain fundamental premises, and that only cranks and bigots thought otherwise.

That all ends now. Now we’re tearing the whole thing down, brick by brick, and we’re doing it with joy in our hearts and laughter on our lips. They built their tower of Babel, and God is scattering them once again—this time using shitposters and podcasters and ordinary men who simply refused to be afraid anymore.

Their primary weapon was never force. It was shame. The entire regime of control rested on a simple mechanism: if you said certain things, if you noticed certain patterns, if you asked certain questions, you would be called a name. And that name be it racist, sexist, antisemite, homophobe, fascist, Nazi—would function as a mark of Cain. It would follow you. It would cost you your job, your friends, your reputation. The word didn’t need to be accurate. It didn’t need to be fair. It just needed to be feared.

For seventy years, this worked. Men who saw the truth kept silent because they feared the consequences of speaking. They watched their countries transformed, their cultures degraded, their children propagandized and they said nothing, because saying something meant losing everything. The regime didn’t need gulags or secret police. It had something more effective: social death administered by whisper campaigns and HR departments.

But then something shifted. Maybe it was the sheer absurdity of watching them call everything racist until the word meant nothing. Maybe it was the internet allowing dissidents to find each other and realize they weren’t alone. Maybe it was the regime overplaying its hand so badly during COVID that millions of normal people suddenly understood that the experts were liars and the institutions were corrupt. Whatever the cause, the result is undeniable: the spell is broken.

They called us racists. We shrugged and said, “Define your terms.” They couldn’t, because “racist” had devolved into meaning “any white person who doesn’t hate himself.” So we stopped caring.

They called us antisemites. We opened our Bibles and read aloud. We quoted the Church Fathers. We pointed out that Jesus Himself called certain people a “synagogue of Satan.” Were they going to call the Son of God an antisemite?

They called us fascists, Nazis, white supremacists. We laughed, because we knew they used those words for anyone to the right of Mitt Romney. The terms had been so overused, so weaponized against so many obviously normal people, that they’d become meaningless. Calling someone a Nazi used to end the conversation. Now it just tells us you’ve run out of arguments.

They reached into their bag of magic words—the incantations that had controlled public discourse for three generations—and found that the words no longer worked. The names that once destroyed careers now merely identify who the regime fears most. Being called a “Christian Nationalist” by the New York Times is now a badge of honor, a sign that you’re over the target. We embrace it and own it.

The regime didn’t just control language; it constructed an entire mythology. A set of stories about history, about human nature, about progress and equality and the arc of justice. These myths were taught in every school, reinforced by every movie, assumed by every journalist. They formed the background radiation of American life—invisible, omnipresent, unquestionable.

But myths only survive as long as people believe them. And belief is crumbling.

They told us that diversity is our strength. They repeated it so often it became a catechism, a creed that every corporation and government agency recited without thought. But when we asked for evidence—when we pointed to the social trust studies, the crime statistics, the educational outcomes, the simple observation that every diverse society in history has been riven by conflict—they had no answer except to call us names. The diversity myth survives not because it’s true, but because questioning it is forbidden. And we no longer respect that prohibition.

They told us that America is a proposition nation—that anyone from anywhere can become “just as American” as the descendants of the Pilgrims simply by reciting an oath and receiving a piece of paper. We read what the actual Founders wrote. We discovered that the Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to “free white persons of good character.” We learned that the Founders explicitly understood America as a nation for a particular people with a particular heritage. The “proposition nation” myth was invented in the twentieth century to justify the demographic transformation of the country. It has no basis in history, and we refuse to pretend otherwise.

They told us that the melting pot was working and that all these disparate peoples from every corner of the globe would eventually blend into one harmonious American identity. We looked around at the actual country: the ethnic enclaves that persist for generations, the bilingual ballots and multilingual government services, the racial grievance industry that grows larger every year, the open hatred directed at the historic American people by those who replaced them. The melting pot is a lie. It never worked, and it was never meant to work. It was a story told to keep the native population docile while their country was stolen from under them.

They told us we had no right to our own nations and that it was somehow immoral for European peoples to have homelands, even as every other group on earth was encouraged to celebrate its identity and preserve its territory. They told us that white people wanting to exist as a distinct people with our own countries was uniquely evil, while every other form of ethnic solidarity was beautiful and virtuous. We noticed the double standard. We refused to accept it. We are taking our countries back, and we don’t care how many think-pieces they write about the “dangers of white identity.”

One by one, every myth they constructed is being demolished:

The myth of equality the idea that all people and all groups are interchangeable, that any differences in outcome must be the result of oppression—is exposed as a weapon wielded against competence and excellence. Equality was never a description of reality; it was a tool for revolution, used to tear down every hierarchy and institution that stood in the way of those who wanted power.

The myth of progress the notion that history moves inexorably toward greater freedom, greater tolerance, greater enlightenment is revealed as a descent into barbarism. They call it progress when children are mutilated in the name of gender ideology. They call it progress when marriage is redefined and the family is destroyed. They call it progress when every form of degeneracy is celebrated while virtue is mocked. We see clearly now: their “progress” is the road to hell, and we’re getting off.

The myth of neutrality the pretense that secular liberalism represents some kind of fair, neutral ground on which all worldviews can compete equally—is unmasked as anti-Christian hatred wearing a procedural costume. There is no neutrality. Every society is organized around ultimate commitments. The question is never whether we’ll have a public religion, but which religion will be established. Their “neutral” liberalism turns out to be an aggressive faith that demands total submission and brooks no rivals. We see it for what it is now, and we reject it utterly.

The myth of “hate” the claim that any preference for your own, any attachment to your own heritage, any resistance to your own replacement, constitutes a moral failing called “hatred”—is shown to be nothing more than unapproved love. They don’t actually object to in-group preference; they celebrate it in every group except one. Their “anti-hate” crusade is simply a way to disarm one particular people while everyone else organizes along ethnic lines. We refuse to unilaterally disarm. We love our own, and we will not apologize for it.

Here’s what truly baffles them, what they cannot wrap their minds around: we’re having the time of our lives.

They expected us to be angry, bitter, consumed by resentment. They expected the weight of their attacks to demoralize us, to grind us down, to make us retreat into sullen silence. Instead, we’re laughing. We’re making memes. We’re building communities. We’re raising families. We’re going to church and growing in faith. We’re more alive than we’ve ever been.

They made a crucial miscalculation. They thought their disapproval still mattered to us. They thought the threat of being called names would keep us in line. But once you stop caring about the opinions of people who hate you and once you realize that their approval was never available to you anyway and that nothing you could ever do would satisfy them: something magical happens. You become free.

And freedom is joyful.

We spent years, many of us spent decades, living under the weight of their manufactured shame. We bit our tongues at family gatherings. We self-censored at work. We watched what we said online. We lived in fear of the social consequences of speaking truth. And it was exhausting. It was soul-crushing. It made us weak and anxious and compliant.

Those days are over.

Now we get to say what we actually think, out loud, and discover that millions of people agree with us. Now we get to watch the regime’s narratives collapse in real time, as normies wake up to truths we’ve understood for years. Now we get to build something new—real friendships, real communities, real institutions—on the foundation of shared truth rather than shared lies.

This isn’t grim duty. This isn’t angry resentment. This is the joy of a man let out of prison. This is the exhilaration of speaking freely after a lifetime of enforced silence. This is the deep satisfaction of finding your people, your tribe, your brothers—men who see what you see and refuse to pretend otherwise.

They spent years making us afraid of them. Now the fear runs in the other direction. They’re the ones writing panicked articles about the “rise of Christian Nationalism.” They’re the ones holding emergency conferences about the “threat to democracy.” They’re the ones whose voices tremble when they talk about what’s happening.

They’re terrified, and they should be.

We, meanwhile, are laughing. Because watching their system of control crumble is genuinely, deeply, hilariously funny.

Let’s talk about long-term trends for a moment.

They have no children. Not really. Oh, some of them have a child—singular—usually after delaying parenthood until their late thirties, usually raised by daycare workers and public school teachers and iPad algorithms. But their fertility rates are catastrophically below replacement. They are quite literally dying out.

We have families. Large ones. We believe children are a blessing, not a burden. We homeschool and disciple and raise the next generation to carry on after we’re gone. Every year, there are more of us and fewer of them. Time is on our side.

They have no faith. They have nothing to die for and therefore nothing to live for. They fill the void with politics and consumption and therapy and prescription drugs. They worship themselves and wonder why they’re miserable. Their spiritual emptiness is written on their faces and evident in their despair.

We have Christ. We have a King who conquered death and promises us eternal life. We have a purpose that transcends politics and outlasts nations. We have a hope that cannot be taken from us by any power on earth. Our faith makes us strong, and their lack of faith makes them weak.

They have no vision for the future. Their entire program is negative: tear down the past, deconstruct everything, abolish every distinction, celebrate every transgression. But they cannot build. They can only destroy. Their vision of the future is a gray, atomized, medicated wasteland of interchangeable consumer-units supervised by bureaucrats and algorithms.

We have a civilization to rebuild. We have a heritage to reclaim. We have a people to preserve and a future to secure for our children and grandchildren. We know what we’re building toward, and we’re willing to work for generations to achieve it.

Every institution they captured is failing. The universities are hemorrhaging credibility. The media is bleeding subscribers. The mainline churches they converged are empty. Their demographic base is shrinking. Their coalition is fragmenting. Their ideological hegemony is collapsing.

They have nothing left but the names they call us. And those names have lost their power.

So let them write their articles. Let them post their warnings. Let them hold their panel discussions about the “threat” we pose. Let them call us every name in their shrinking arsenal.

We’re not listening anymore.

We’re over here building parallel institutions and raising strong families. We’re planting churches and winning school board elections. We’re networking with our brothers and preparing for the long struggle ahead. We’re reading old books and rediscovering ancient wisdom. We’re lifting weights and learning skills and becoming men our ancestors would be proud of.

And yes, we’re laughing. We’re enjoying the memes and the camaraderie and the sheer absurdity of watching a dying regime flail against the inevitable. We’re having fun, because why wouldn’t we? God is on His throne. History is turning. The future belongs to those who show up for it.

Their world is ending. Ours is just beginning.

Let them rage into the void. We have work to do—and we’re going to enjoy every minute of it.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc

Christ is King

Political Rabies - left-hand-path nationalism The Satanists and provocateurs leading young patriots down a deadly blind alley

 

Political Rabies - left-hand-path nationalism

The Satanists and provocateurs leading young patriots down a deadly blind alley

By Nick Griffin Dec 2025
Follow Nick on Substack

Atomwaffen - a classic state-directed ‘pseudo-gang’, created to misdirect and besmirch legitimate opposition to liberal tyranny.

Young nationalists are being presented with some very bad role models and some thoroughly evil ideas. What follows is not an account of a handful of isolated cranks. It is a warning that their twisted ideas are alive, current and being spread among young men searching for an alternative to toxic liberalism.

Any nationalist who ignores their political rabies, let alone provides some sort of platform for or defence of it, is part of the problem, and a traitor to the Cause.

This is not another study of the anti-Christian heresy of Dispensationalism, better known today as Christian-Zionism. Especially following the Charlie Kirk murder and Carlson/Fuentes interview, we do not need another rehash of the MAGA vs MIGA controversy.

Political Rabies

What is useful, however, is an examination of the ideas and bad actors currently polluting the fringes of Nationalism. We will start with the neo-Nazi Satanists.

Whenever some autistic incel either murders innocent people or is caught planning to copy one who already has, the same ‘skull mask’ organisations crop up. Atomwaffen, The Base, and Feuerkrieg Division are the most common.

They all emerged from Iron March, a neo-fascist web forum active from 2011 to 2017. Strangely, for a supposedly white racist movement, it was founded by a mixed-race Russian-Uzbek, Alisher Mukhitdinov, whose family had been noted Communists in Uzbekistan.

alexander-slavros

Under the name ‘Alexander Slavros’, he promoted a far-right form of ‘accelerationism’ – the idea of sparking racial conflict through assassinations, murders and terrorist attacks.

Iron March became a platform for militant neo-Nazi organisations and for individuals later responsible for several acts of terrorism and murder. In February 2015, three people were arrested for planning to commit a Valentine’s Day mass shooting at a shopping mall in Halifax, Nova Scotia. One of the suspects, 23-year-old Lindsay Souvannarath of Illinois, was an active member of the Iron March forum and the ex-girlfriend of its founder.

Devon Arthurs, an Iron March user and member of the Atomwaffen Division (AWD), killed his two roommates, also members of AWD, in 2017. Arthurs’ remaining roommate and fellow Iron March user Brandon Russell was arrested in Florida, for stockpiling of illegal weapons and bomb-making materials. Russell had been among Iron March’s most prolific users, having written around 1,500 posts on the site.

YouTube video from Myatt’s Muslim phase. This, together with his earlier efforts to push neo-nazi ideas in the British nationalist movement, is entirely consistent with the Satanist tactic of joining organisations not to advance their cause, but to use their followers to spread evil and death.

The Iron March forum indoctrinated users with the twisted ideas of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA), a Satanist organisation founded by the British neo-Nazi David Myatt in 1974. While Myatt later converted to Islam, various of his followers developed the ideas which he had taken from Alistair Crowley and shared them on the forum. These included ritualised rape, lynching, random attacks on innocent victims and what they describe as “human culling”.

Interestingly, Myatt was never arrested despite the fact that his violent teachings in a Practical Guide to Aryan Revolution were cited by the perpetrator of the deadly 1999 London Bombings. Myatt now claims to have rejected both Satanism and Islam, but the baneful influence of his writings continues in fringe circles.

Joshua Sutter - one of the key founders of left-hand path Nazism, and a long-term FBI asset.

Also very influential was the ‘Tempel ov Blood’, an O9A-affiliated group headed by Joshua Sutter. Through his wife’s publishing house, Martinet Press, Sutter produced a book, Iron Gates, whose depictions of human sacrifice and child rape became a hit with the new Satanic far right. “Iron Gates, NOW!” became the slogan of the Atomwaffen Division.

joshua-sutter

During the prosecution of Atomwaffen’s Kaleb Cole, it emerged that Sutter was a paid FBI informant for 16 years, receiving more than $140,000.

Iron March users in Britain were heavily involved in the creation of National Action, now banned after terrorist plots and attacks in which its Satanist-inspired members played key roles. NA member Ryan Fleming had several vampiric/Satanist books published by Martinet Press. He went on to be imprisoned for sexually abusing a mentally-disabled teenage boy. After his release he was arrested and jailed for a further three years for sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl whom he had groomed online.

Another offshoot of Iron March was The Base (‘Al Qaeda’ in English). Formed in 2018 by Rinaldo Nazzaro, the group was active in the United States, Canada, Australia and Europe, and designated as a terrorist organization in Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, and the European Union.

Once again, we see the pattern – which duplicates that seen with Islamist terrorism from Al Qaeda to ISIS – of key leaders having been employed by U.S. Deep State security services. It wasn’t just the informer Sutter, Nazzaro was a former employee of the FBI and the Pentagon.

Iron March ideas continue to pollute the ultra right, but are not the only baneful influence. Also prominent is former American Nazi Party theorist James Mason, whose rambling book Siege continues to incite young radicals to form terrorist cells to murder opponents and members of ethnic minorities.

Mason is a long-term follower of the murderous cult leader Charlie Manson, who he describes as “the philosophical and ideological leader” of the so-called ‘leaderless resistance’. Also an admirer of Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey, Mason proudly included in Siege LaVey’s handwritten dedication in the copy of his Satanic Bible which the arch Satanist gave to him.

azov-black-sun

The Satanist influence on US Deep State-funded extremists does not, however, stop with Americans and Brits. Iron March also helped to form the left-hand path neo-Nazism of the militant Ukrainian Azov Battalion. Its occult Dark Sun symbol, widely used as a logo, battle flag and tattoo, is a visual clue to the ideas which inspire many of the fighters whom the CIA, Defense Department and NATO allies have funded trained and armed.

The anti-Putin Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK) was armed to the teeth with US weapons when it launched its short-lived invasion of Russia’s Belgorod region on the Ukrainian border. Key RDK figure Kirill Kanakhin has stated that the ‘Tempel of the Black Sun’, a Moscow-based group operating within the Satanist Order of Nine Angles “formed my main social circle for several years”.

The RDK’s two main leaders are Alexei Levkin and Denis Kapustin. Armed by NATO, they are promoted by the media of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, an exiled Jewish ‘liberal oligarch’. Both men are also linked to the ONA. The group propagandises the ideas and actions of ‘heroes’ such as the Christchurch Shooter, Timothy McVeigh, and Anders Breivik. It has also inspired and encouraged murders of the homeless and migrants in Russia.

Before going to fight in Ukraine, Kapustin was one of the most notorious neo-Nazis in Germany, to which his family had moved from Russia when he was a boy. He got a visa to move to Germany on account of his Jewish roots. Before his EU visa was revoked in 2014, Kapustin visited a National Action training camp in the UK.

There is a great irony in the development of left-hand Nazism in recent decades. Satanism and theosophist groups had proliferated in Weimar Germany, but were ruthlessly suppressed by the National Socialist regime.

From 1935-36, ‘Aktion Gegen die Sekten’ raids shut down dozens of occult groups. Members were sent to Dachau, where they were imprisoned for ‘re-education’. Satanists were classified as ‘Antisocial’, wearing black triangles on their forced labour camp uniforms.

‘False Fathers’ - Evil Role-Models

Satanists, murderers, rapists, paedophiles, provocateurs, non-whites, FBI informants and employees, CIA-backed mercenaries and monsters who have tortured Russian POWs to death in Ukraine, as well as murdering Russian-speaking civilians in cold blood.

That is the grim roll-call of the men and organisations presented as heroes and role-models to impressionable young nationalists by an increasing number of bad actors on the furthest fringes of the far far right. Our youngsters, and our people, deserve much better.

The problem of unhealthy influence seeping through 21st-century nationalism does not, however, stop with the dangerous crackpots we have seen above. There is another, much more ‘intellectual’ tendency, most commonly termed ‘Neo-Reactionary’, whose theories are gaining currency among supposedly ‘right-wing’ thinkers.

curtis-yarvin

Curtis Yarvin. The face reflects the soul. When a creature like this becomes a guru for men who think they are becoming gods, you know there’s a problem!

Fronted by ‘philosophers’ such as Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin, this tendency is superficially a very long way from the dark, violent fantasies of the individuals and groups we have examined here. But Neo-Reactionary theories are the intellectual window-dressing and ‘justification’ for the transhumanism and ‘gov-tech’ tyranny now being embraced by some of the most powerful men in the world.

While not overtly Satanist, the ‘Homo Deus’ ambitions of the Tech Bros are most definitely Luciferian. Despite the different label, the only real difference between the ideas of Myatt and Slavros, and those of Land and Yarvin, is that the former appeal to alienated and powerless teenagers, while the influence of the latter extends to the Vice President of the United States.

This makes the Neo-Reactionary movement one of the most dangerous strands of political thought of our age. We shall therefore return to it, and the nationalist case against it, in due course.

Tuesday, 9 December 2025

Why Did the Mirror Break the Griffin Embargo Deep State Dirty Trick to Block an Important Discussion

 

Deep State Dirty Trick to Block an Important Discussion

Follow Nick On Substack
Follow Nick on X


 



 
Nick Griffin 2025

As I passed through Birmingham Airport a couple of weeks ago. I was stopped by a smiling Asian man in his forties. “Hi, Nick,” he said with significant enthusiasm as he shook my hand. “Where have you been the past years? We’ve not seen anything about you for ages”.

He was a Sikh, and he had noted something very real. It is indeed more than fifteen years since I was a regular feature in the British media. My public lynching on Question Time in 2009 was supposed to “expose the BNP for what they really are”, but it didn’t work. Contrary to the leftist myth, it led to a jump in the BNP’s standing in the next opinion poll to a staggering 22% of voters saying they would now consider voting BNP.

At that point, it was decided, not only by the BBC, but indeed by the entire UK media to place me under an embargo. There was to be no coverage of Nick Griffin from then on, unless it was either unavoidable under electoral law, or if I do something terribly wrong. Ever since then, have indeed had effectively no coverage, with the recent exception of brief reports of the fact that I am being prosecuted for an alleged and allegedly anti-Semitic tweet.

Strangely, however, all that changed two days ago, with a prominent article in the Daily Mirror, bylined by one Don Warburton. It was headlined: “Ex-BNP boss’ sick message to nationalists to join army to be ready for ‘civil war’.”

Complete with unusually fair pictures of me, the article went on to say that I was recommending that young men should join the cadets or Army reserves, rather than joining hard-right fringe groups, owing to the risk of arrest for illegal paramilitary training.

The piece talked of a “scaremongering web article’, alleging that “Griffin wildly claims that Britain faces a war within the next five years within Britain’s Muslim and non-Muslim population”.

The article went on to quote at length from my Substack piece – although, needless to say, not telling readers where it was published. The quotes from my article were entirely accurate. They were also very clearly in keeping with the thoughts of a wide body of public opinion. This was shown by the comments section, on which the large majority of people posting were saying that I was right.

Where the article was wildly inaccurate and deliberately misleading was the claim that the “five years till civil war” statement came from me. Which of course it did not. My article included a link to an earlier Substack piece, in which I asked. “Who is trying to push Britain to civil war?”

In the course of that article. I zeroed in on Professor David Betz, Head of War Studies at King’s College London. As everyone following this issue online will know the” civil war within five years across the whole of Western Europe” originated with David Betts. I did not make it, I reported it.

Further, as anyone who read my previous article, or has seen other podcasts in which I have discussed this matter will know, I specifically questions whether it is realistic? And I conclude that – at present – it is not.

What I do think, however, is that there is a serious risk that that this will change. Especially now that that the push for civil war by the counter jihadists has been joined by far more authoritative voices from the British - and hence American - deep state military intelligence establishment.

Why Did the Mirror Break the Griffin Embargo?

This brings us to the question of why the Mirror has broken a rule which is now more than 15 years old. Why did the rag cover my Substack article? Especially given that they must know perfectly well that a large number of Britons completely agree with me – particularly given the way that they presented it.

If they were aiming that article at me or at Brits they would have needed to tell readers that Nick Griffin has gone soft. He’s a liberal. He’s sitting down and talking with Muslims. He’s far more anti-Zionist than he is anti-Islam. Etc, etc.

But this article did the precise opposite. Why? Because it is not aimed at me. It is not aimed at Brits, it is aimed at Muslims. A couple of days before the Mirror published i’s hitpiece. I travelled down to London.

There I did an interview of nearly two hours with Dilly Hussain of the 5Pillars of Islam podcast. This is a channel which has very significant reach, and influence, within the Muslim community in Britain, particularly among young *Anglosphere Muslims*.

The first time I did such an interview, it not only had a huge audience, it also led to Rishi Sunak using his rain-soaked Number 10 doorstep appearance to say that it was very dangerous and worrying that fundamentalist Muslims and the ‘extreme right’ are working together.

This was a direct reference to our first groundbreaking discussion on 5Pillars, which was then followed by separate podcasts on the same Muslim channel, with Jayda Fransen. Mark Collett and Jim Dawson. This was seen as very dangerous, not just by Sunak but by the entire liberal and Zionist elites.

The Mirror piece was clearly aimed at stopping the broadcasting of this second interview. It was due to be published on Friday, but Dilly Hussain told me yesterday that it is now on ice. This doesn’t surprise me and I do understand where they’re coming from. The Five Pillars team are worried that many Muslims will have seen or heard about the article, and that they will believe it.

Of course, knowing as they do the lies, the left-Zionist Mirror tells about all sorts of other things, they really shouldn’t believe everything they read in the Daily Mirror. But that’s the way things are. So Dilly has concluded for now that his viewers will be inclined to think that I’m trying to fool them. By talking about peace while, behind their backs, preparing for war.

While I understand their problem, that analysis is completely wrong on many levels. First, I’m always straight with people. I openly published that article two weeks before the interview, on November the 25th, to be precise. And I specifically suggested that Dilly should read my Substack articles before the interview. I did not “speak with my people” about my views, I put them on a public forum, where a Muslim can read what I think, and why, as easily as any native Brit.

The next point which Muslims worried by the Daily Mirror piece need to understand is that the audience for my Join the Army Substack, was not the public. It was not Muslims. It was specifically aimed at a relatively small group of dangerously isolated young Brits. Muslims need to consider my motive in addressing these ‘Lost Boys’.

An earlier Substack mention of joining the Army Reserve had led several people to ask if doing so would make them liable for call up for the globalists’ next crazy war, whether in Ukraine, the Middle East or Taiwan. A major part of the article dealt with this issue, and not the question of civil war at all. That, of course, was ignored.

There are in Britain today thousands – I guess many thousands – of very frightened, angry and deeply alienated young indigenous men. They genuinely believe that civil war with the Muslims is an imminent and very real danger. However wrong you think they are, however wrong they may or may not be, doesn’t make any difference. They believe it, so they are going to prepare in some way for it.

The choice they are going to make is not between whether they sit with their Playstations or prepare for the civil war they believe is coming. The only choice is whether they prepare for their civil war. by joining the British Army, or by forming cells influenced by neo- Nazism, Zionist provocateurs and Satanists.

I have to ask the Five Pillars team, which do you prefer? I know that many Muslims have an issue with the British military over its involvement in US/NATO forever wars against Muslim countries. So do I, I oppose them all, and always have done.

But when it comes to life here at home, young lads joining the Army cadets or Reserve, learning to drill and to shoot military rifles, which are kept under strict security, are no danger to anyone in Britain - including Muslims. But the same individuals, armed with petrol bombs and hammers - as discussed by Professor Betz - isolated in cells, influenced by anonymousfive pillar agitators on Telegram, and talking themselves into a frenzy; they really would be dangerous.

In trying to give them a sensible, legitimate alternative which can allay their fears, I am not “preparing for war”, I am trying to keep angry young men out of prison, and to stop those who avoid that fate going out and attacking Muslims.

I am also - I have no problem admitting it - trying to give my people the advice which will best serve them if by some horrible chance the monsters trying to set Britain ablaze manage to do so.

I have no doubt that there are young Muslims considering how best to defend their communities if the Counter Jihadists manage to kick it all off, and I don’t blame them. “Self-defence is no offence”, but it must apply to all and be exercised with responsibility, humanity and realism.

Muscle-bound weightlifters with Black Sun tattoos and a Satanic lust for blood would be worse than useless in a shooting war. Young men who can drill, shoot, respect civilians and obey orders are the most likely to be able to stop it. Or at least to keep it within the boundaries of basic decency.

I have been warning about the civil war-mongers, and expressing my opposition to the whole idea, since my earliest essays here on Substack (and before that in repeated podcasts. Sleepwalkers and Cattle Prods is just one example.

I do not want it to come to that. Having spoken with Dilly Hussain and others from his community, I am conviced that they and their people do not want it either. Nor do I think it likely. But pretending there’s no risk at all only adds to the outside chance that those pushing for it will get their way.

Most of all, anti-Zionists and especially Britain’s Muslims need to understand that I have not only been calling out Tommy Robinson and Co. as Zionist provocateurs for well over 13 years, I am now also putting my neck on the line to point out that the push for civil war - under the guise of warning about it – now appears to have been taken up by the intelligence elite of the British Army.

Further, while some other so-called far right commentators take the same anti-Zionist position as me, I am the only one saying that to help defuse the threat of civil war, Muslim and non-Muslim parents – particularly traditional Christians and nationalists - should seek positive ways to work together, starting with a grassroots campaign against LGBTQ indoctrination in schools.

They Want to Keep Us Apart

That is why they want to keep us apart - and mired in uninformed mutual hostility - which is why that Daily Mirror article was published. It certainly wasn’t the decision of the journalist who wrote it, nor of the Mirror’s editor. The story was commissioned by the British Deep State.

It is aimed not at Mirror readers or Brits in general, or at me. It was aimed specifically at Muslims and the 5Pillars team. To stop us talking. To stop us working together, not only against Zionist occupation in Palestine, but also Zionist political occupation here in Britain. To stop us, above all, having the frank exchanges which are the best defence against the utterly wicked attempt to plunge us all into civil war.

If anyone had any doubt as to whether we should talk, the fact that the warmongering, genocidal, Military-Industrial Complex whores at MI5 don’t want us to, should be all they need to know. We’re on the right track, so we shouldn’t let them push us off it.

We do not need, or want, either civil war or integration and assimilation in liberal Sodom. We do not need a civil war, we need a civil divorce; so that we can get on with preserving our own separate identities, traditions, values and faiths. Finding things on which we agree, and talking honestly about the things about which we cannot, is the best way to achieve that.

Accordingly. I hope most sincerely that Dilly and the 5Pillars team will see past the intelligence service’s black propaganda stunt in the left-Zionist Daily Mirror, and run that interview sooner rather than later. Their people have a right to see it, and need to see it. And so do mine.

This is a real news story. About an issue of huge importance, addressed with a seriousness and vision that you simply won’t find anywhere else. So please take a moment to Restack it and post the link elsewhere on social media. You don’t have to say you agree with it, just ask people to read it and tell you what THEY think!