
Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Search This Blog
FREEDOM NEWS HOME PAGE
Friday, 3 February 2023
Toksvig the Theologian - Irreverend Episode 111
Thursday, 2 February 2023
Trans extremists are terrorists, pure and simple
Trans extremists are terrorists, pure and simple
-
IN A recent article for Spiked, Brendan O’Neill refers to transgender activists as ‘jihadists’. Is he right to draw this parallel between extreme gender activism and terrorism? I think he is.
In the UK, the crime of terrorism has two elements – a mental element or intention plus a physical act. A person is guilty of terrorism if both elements can be proved. A terrorist must first have the intention to influence the government, or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public, for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause. The terrorist must then carry out or threaten serious violence against a person; serious damage to property; the endangering of a person’s life; a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or serious interference with or disruption to an electronic system. A clear example we all recognise would be the Provisional IRA, who wanted to influence the government and intimidate the public to advance the political cause of a united Ireland. They did this by planting bombs and threatening to plant bombs.
On January 19 an extremist stated on Twitter his desire to kill J K Rowling with a hammer and fantasised that someone would drive into and kill gender critical women planning a lawful demonstration in Scotland next month. On Saturday, two SNP parliamentarians were photographed smiling in front of a banner calling for women to be decapitated. (They said later they were unaware of the sign.)
The activists involved want to influence the government and intimidate women to advance their ideological cause. Such ideology conforms with the mental element of the definition of terrorism. When this ideology motivates them to advocate decapitation and encourage ploughing down gender critical women, they are clearly threatening serious violence, endangering life or putting the health of a section of the public at serious risk. By definition, they become terrorists.
Decapitation was ISIS’s preferred method of murder, also used in the horrendous slaughter of British Army soldier Lee Rigby in 2013. Vehicles were used as weapons in both the Westminster Bridge and London Bridge attacks of 2017. Extreme trans activists are deliberately using the brutal imagery of previous terrorist attacks to evoke fear amongst women.
To check our thinking, we might refer to the Metropolitan Police’s useful online guide to terrorist activity, helping the public to identify the signs of those who use the internet to ‘promote, glorify or help carry out acts of terrorism and violent extremism’. The guide tells us that:
‘You can help by being vigilant for behaviour and content such as:
- speeches or essays calling for racial or religious violence
- videos of violence with messages in praise of terrorists
- postings inciting people to commit acts of terrorism or violent extremism
- messages intended to stir up hatred against any religious or ethnic group
- bomb-making instructions’
Substitute ‘racial or religious’ for ‘gender’ and it’s plain that we should be warning the police of the trans activist terrorists in our midst – the tweet about driving into female protesters is quite clearly inciting people to commit acts of violent extremism and intends to stir up hatred.
The government’s Counter Extremism Strategy, part of the Prevent programme, defines extremism as ‘vocal or active opposition to our fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and respect and tolerance for different faiths and beliefs’. I have no doubt that misogynistic activists referring to women as ‘evil’ and ‘demonic’, screaming ‘witch’ into their faces as they protested at Holyrood against the Gender Recognition Act, oppose our fundamental values and have neither respect nor tolerance for individual liberty and different beliefs – these actions would appear to fit the definition of extremism.
The mechanism in place for dealing with extremists, called Channel, involves balancing the right to freedom of speech with the need to confront ‘instances of unclear, mixed or unstable ideology’. Until now, this has involved challenging the thinking of religiously motivated or right-wing terrorists, but violent misogyny is also an unstable mindset, one that we should be seeking to identify and prevent. Channel guidance, issued in 2020, acknowledging that most people engaged with a cause or ideology do not go on to develop an intention to cause harm, identifies factors that ‘describe the mindset that is associated with a readiness to use violence.’ These include: ‘over-identification with a group or ideology, “them and us” thinking and dehumanisation of the enemy.’
Such dehumanisation of victims is a topic well known to those who study terrorism. As the University of South Florida puts it, ‘Lack of empathy for others and the ease with which they dehumanise and devalue enemies makes the transition to violence and terrorism less difficult.’ I can’t think of a clearer example of dehumanisation than the repugnant practice of labelling as ‘TERFs’ (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) ordinary women who do not want to share their toilets, refuges, prisons and sports with biological men. Thinking of the enemy as TERFS rather than women enables radicalised young men to call for their decapitation and to fantasise about killing them with cars.
The blocking of Scotland’s GRA by Westminster, albeit a move with which a substantial proportion of British citizens appear to agree, will have created fertile ground for radicalisation towards violence. The European Commission’s Expert Group on Violent Radicalisation recognises, as do other studies, that extremism thrives in an enabling environment where there is ‘a widely shared sense of injustice, whether real or perceived’ among parts of the populace. In this context, activists drawn towards violence feel justified in presenting themselves ‘as a self-declared vanguard.’ Though writing, in 2008, chiefly about religiously motivated terrorism, the expert group notes that ‘alienation or the sense of a personal identity crisis’, concepts that may well apply to trans gender activists, increase levels of frustration and may push activists over the edge into violence. Though this is undoubtedly a fringe phenomenon – most supporters of the GRA have not threatened to kill J K Rowling – we ‘should not underestimate it’.
It is important to emphasise that the vast majority of trans gender activists are not likely to become violent extremists. It was ever thus; most people campaigning for a united Ireland are not violent. Nevertheless, a small group of extreme trans activists are beginning to look and sound like terrorists. It’s time we started using counter-terrorism methodologies, preventative as well as punitive, to deal with them. If not, when there is some awful act of violence, we will rue the fact that we ignored the warning signs and did not adequately protect our mothers, wives, sisters and daughters.
If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.
Wednesday, 1 February 2023
The real climate crisis is sinister ideology
-
IT IS easy to get bogged down in the technical detail of the climate debate. But science can distract us from the fact that before climate change, environmentalists made exactly the same kind of predictions that now drive arguments for draconian climate policies. The gloomy predictions of civilisation’s imminent collapse made by environmentalists in the 1970s came to nothing – the world population grew larger, wealthier, healthier and safer. This should alert us to the fact that, whether or not ‘climate change is real’, environmentalism is a radical political ideology, bent on reorganising the world, whatever the facts are. It is not merely a response to scientific discovery about our relationship with the natural world.
We should not forget this historical context of the climate debate and motivation for the climate policy agenda, because ideology is insidious, and far more powerful than scientific rationalism. Today’s radical greens, from world leaders to street-blocking narcissists, have learned not to make the mistake of their predecessors. Rather than making predictions that fail to materialise, their new trick is to claim that the ‘climate crisis’ is ‘happening now’: people are starving, diseases are rampant, storms, floods, wildfires and heatwaves kill thousands by the day, forcing millions from their homes and into poverty, all underpinned by dramatic images on TV news stories to cement the narrative without any journalistic incredulity towards official stories.
But the ‘climate crisis’ simply isn’t happening at all. Just as the world defied green predictions half a century ago, all metrics of human welfare make the opposite case: humanity is thriving like never before. And just as in the 1970s, it is ideology, not fact, which drives the green narrative. In our new film, we at Climate Debate UK attempt to show how this regressive ideology has been transmitted, using the idea of a ‘climate crisis’, from the top strata of global society, through governments and the media, to very young children, where it poisons their view of the world and their futures.
It is ideology, not mere scientific error, that has blinded people to the fact that abundant, affordable and reliable energy has made the world a much better place. Worse, it is ideology that has clouded the moral judgement of people who have wilfully turned extremely young children into instruments of the political agenda, to prevent them driving this development onward. ‘Science’ is just a fig leaf.
You can see the film here.
If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a
Tuesday, 31 January 2023
This is important
Sunday, 29 January 2023
Nuculear War, Bioweapon Awakening, Dollar Dies & Paul Craig Roberts
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com with special Guest Dr. Paul Craig Roberts for these stories and more for the Weekly News Wrap-Up for 1.27.23.
To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/
It's happening! Bye Bye Cash
Saturday, 28 January 2023
Neil Oliver: 'We are sleepwalking into a ZERO TRUST new world
Will Putin’s Legacy Be Nuclear Armageddon?
Will Putin’s Legacy Be Nuclear Armageddon?
How long is Putin going to sit on his butt and allow his limited military operation to be widened into nuclear war? If Putin does not soon fulfill his responsibility to quickly bring the conflict to a decisive Russian victory before Washington and NATO can further widen the war, Putin’s legacy will be nuclear Armageddon.
For a year now Putin has allowed a war Russia could have quickly won to widen into a confrontation between the US/NATO and Russia. This is no longer a limited Russian operation in Donbass. Each successive widening by the West has crossed more Russian red lines that are never enforced. If Putin wasn’t willing to fight a war, he should not have gone into Donbass.
Now with heavy armor such as Leopard and Abrams tanks on their way to Ukraine comes depleted uranium ammunition. The Russians say they regard the use of such ammunition the same as the use of dirty nuclear bombs. Konstantin Gavrilov says “we will consider this as a use against Russia of dirty bombs with all the ensuing consequences.”
So, by sitting on his butt for a year, making a mockery of Russia’s military strength, playing an uncalled for goody two shoes role, Putin’s forever war has widened to the nuclear level.
And there is still no sign of any change in Putin’s conduct of the conflict.
It does seem that Putin very belatedly has mobilized some Russian Army soldiers to take some of the burden from the Donbass militias and the private army group known as the Wagner Group, which are the two outnumbered forces that have been fighting the large American trained and equipped Ukrainian Army. If independent reports are correct, these Russian Army soldiers and their equipment are sufficient to break through the Ukrainian defensive lines and roll up the remaining Ukrainians. But apparently, Putin’s approach hasn’t changed. It will still be the slow slog village by village. The depleted uranium ammo will be fired. The Russians will again forget their warning and do nothing. Then longer range US missiles will be sent to Ukraine, and Moscow will be hit. Again Putin will do nothing, thus encouraging more and worse provocations until the result is nuclear war.
To avoid this slow march to planetary death, what is called for is the complete shutdown of Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lutsk, Lviv, and Odesa, the destruction of all power, water, and transportation infrastructure, air drops of troops and heavy armor and pouring of hundreds of thousands of troops across the Belarus border to seal Ukraine off from the West, and the complete and total annihilation of the Zelensky Nazi government and Ukrainian military. This can be done in blitzkrieg fashion before the West can react.
Horrible, you say. Yes, indeed, horrible. But far better than nuclear Armageddon which is where this slow war scenario of Putin’s is going.
Friday, 27 January 2023
Coronating Wokery - Irreverend episode 110
Tuesday, 24 January 2023
Nick Griffin on Templar Report - 24 January 2023
Great War Memorial Plaque: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/great_war_memorial_plaque
Templar Winter Jacket: https://templarstore.com/product/templar-winter-jacket/
Knights Templar 2023 Calendar: https://templarstore.com/product/knights-templar-2023-calendar/
Knights Templar Annual Report 2022: https://templarstore.com/product/knights-templar-annual-report-2022-2023/
-----------------------
Lionheart Dagger: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/lionheart-dagger
Templar Seal Dagger: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/templar_seal_dagger
Full Knight Special with FREE Gurkha and FREE Gauntlets: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/full_knight_gurkha_package
Crusade for America: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/crusade_for_america_fundraiser
Crusade for America Volunteer Pack: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/crusade_for_america_volunteer
Book of Common Prayer: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/book_of_common_prayer
New Clothing launched on our store: https://www.templarstore.com/
---
Secure your place in Magdalene Chapel: https://www.knightstemplarorder.com/magdalene_chapel
You can now donate via bitcoin: 15K7WVhpGBWJqqv6q6vaLcNvePuygdhcSk
---
Members can join our discord: https://discord.gg/NPGWbZh
Follow us on telegram: https://t.me/KnightsTemplarOfficial
The Scientific Facts Are In: The Covid Virus and Pandemic are Man-Made. The mRNA “vaccine” Is More Deadly than the Virus
The Scientific Facts Are In: The Covid Virus and Pandemic are Man-Made. The mRNA “vaccine” Is More Deadly than the Virus
The Scientific Facts Are In: The Covid Virus and Pandemic are Man-Made. The mRNA “vaccine” Is More Deadly than the Virus
Paul Craig Roberts
One of the top medical practitioners and medical scientists of our time confirms under oath in the one hour deposition here — https://odysee.com/@Video_di_KasperCarlo:d/COVID-CRIMES-Dr.-Richard-M.Fleming-MD-sworn-testimony-that-C-(sub-ita-COMPLETO):a — that Covid is a bioweapon developed with US government money in contravention of the Bioweapons Convention, Nuremberg Laws, US Constitution and as such is an act of treason. Richard Fleming, M.D., J.D., Ph.D. (physics), also testifies that the mRNA “vaccine” is useless. It does not prevent Covid or its spread. To the contrary, the “vaccine” aids the spread of Covid by disrupting the body’s immune system. The evidence is clear that the “vaccine” has caused more death and health injury than the made-in-the-laboratory Covid virus itself.
From early in the orchestrated “pandemic,” I reported the skepticism and warnings of leading medical practitioners and scientists. These expert warnings were censored. Everything the independent practitioners and scientists said has turned out to be true. Nothing Fauci, CDC, FDA, WHO, Biden, Big Pharma, and the media said is true.
Dr. Fleming spells out the facts so clearly that if you pay attention, you do not need to be a scientist to understand the criminal deception that has been fostered on the people of the world by Big Pharma, public health authorities, politicians, and media. And these criminals are still at work hyping boosters for babies.
As I have repeatedly emphasized, our time is one in which propaganda has prevailed over science and truth. Lies spewed out by Fauci, Biden, and dumbshit talking heads on TV reach more people than hard medical and scientific fact voiced under oath by the top scientists of our time. As George Orwell said, “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
In Europe there is a movement to hold accountable those responsible for mass murder. In the US the government and complicit medical boards and HMOs are desperately trying to criminalize those who tell the truth about Covid and the “vaccine.”