Neil Oliver: ‘…they’re getting ready to shut us up for good!!!’

…it's about making people feel hopeless?’ To help support the channel & get exclusive videos every week sign up to Neil Oliver on Patreon.com   / neiloliver   To donate go to Neil’s Website: https://www.neiloliver.com Shop: https://neil-oliver.creator-spring.com YouTube Channel:    / @neil-oliver   Rumble site – Neil Oliver Official: https://rumble.com/c/c-6293844 Instagram - NeilOliverLoveLetter:   / neiloliverloveletter   Podcasts: Season 1: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Season 2: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...

Supreme Court Confirms Sex is Biological = Nick Griffin Reports

 

What does today's historic victory for common sense and decency in the Supreme Court mean for nationalists?

Nick Griffin on Labour's Grooming Betrayal

 

Also looking at British steel, the problem of assimilation and the sidelining of Easter 

Join Nick for future reports at Purged TV 

Conversation With Nick Griffin & David Clews

 Maverick MP Rupert Lowe Has challenged the failing NHS and the cowardly politicians who are afraid of tackling the subject . Today in a Tweet on X Mr Lowe MP stated the following .

Rupert Lowe MP

@RupertLowe10

"Politicians are absolutely terrified of criticising the NHS. It’s pathetic, honestly. A slavish devotion to a health service, one which is spectacularly failing. 'Our' NHS, they all line up and chant. It’s only 'our' NHS in the sense we all pay for it, and we all get ripped off - together. It’s a destructive system, but nobody is willing to say it. It simply does not work for the people paying the bills, to the point more and more don’t even bother trying. They go private, and continue to pump their tax into the endless firepit that is ‘our’ NHS. We need a full royal commission to look at what systems work for countries similar to us, and how we can copy the best bits of those different systems. YES, that does mean the funding model may change and you can quote me on that. If it results in a more efficient system, then GOOD. Let’s change it. Look at what works around the world, and let’s steal the best ideas - the funding models, the tech systems, the incentives, the training. Let’s build something that actually works. It’s always presented as the NHS or the American option. NOT TRUE. People aren’t dying in the Sydney streets of appendicitis or limping around Paris with untreated broken legs. There are OTHER options. And actually, looking at patient outcomes - ones that work far better than our own. Medical professionals within the health service do fantastic work within a failing system. But the structure around them needs to be torn down and rebuilt. There’s a reason thousands and thousands leave the NHS to work in a system that actually works. Perhaps we should start asking why? Grown men and women in Parliament, from all parties, need to extract themselves from the NHS cult. All terrified about finding themselves on some flimsy campaign leaflet. ‘Privatisation’ is the kryptonite of common sense. WHO CARES. That cowardice led us to this point. Labour, Tory, Reform - they’re all scared stiff of touching the NHS debate with a very long pole. Afraid of the outrage mob. I think it’s finally time for some honesty. The NHS was a noble idea, that has long outlived its usefulness. If we were starting from scratch today, nobody, absolutely nobody, would design what we currently have. We need a Royal Commission to explore the best way forward - independent of party politics. It’s that, or the cult continues".

America is addicted to the moment

 

America is addicted to the moment. We swipe credit cards for dopamine hits, chase trends that vanish overnight, and measure our lives in viral clips and fleeting “experiences.” We’ve traded the dignity of patience for the chaos of now, mortgaging tomorrow to feed the hunger of today. This isn’t just a financial crisis—it’s a spiritual famine. We’ve forgotten how to plant seeds that take decades to grow, to build altars for children we’ll never meet, to live as if our choices ripple into eternity. The cult of instant gratification has gutted our vision. We scroll, we spend, we sprint—and we’re left with empty wallets, hollow relationships, and a nation gasping for air. But there’s a way out. The Bible, ancient and unflinching, calls us to rebel against this tyranny of the temporary. It thunders with a truth we’ve buried: We were made for more than this.

Related: Click Here to Listen To My New Podcast Episode on The New Social Contract, a chapter from my book Reclaiming Reality.

Our ancestors built cathedrals over centuries. They crossed oceans to carve out futures they wouldn’t live to see. Who is doing things like this today? Debt strangles half the country because we’d rather feel rich today than be free tomorrow. Marriages collapse when the grind gets hard. Politicians sell quick fixes because we’ve lost the stomach for sacrifice. We’ve become a people allergic to the weight of legacy, chasing the shadow of “YOLO” (You Only Live Once) while the substance of life evaporates. This isn’t freedom—it’s a slow-motion suicide of the soul. We need to recover the lost discipline of delayed glory, the holy defiance of living for what outlasts us.

The older generation, raised in an era of unprecedented prosperity, now clings to its wealth with a quiet ruthlessness. Having benefited from affordable education, booming job markets, and pensions that no longer exist, many have chosen to spend their golden years hoarding resources rather than stewarding them. They’ll drop $80k on a luxury RV to tour national parks but balk at helping their children with a down payment on a first home. They’ll lecture about “financial responsibility” while leveraging reverse mortgages to siphon equity from family homes, leaving nothing but debt for heirs. This isn’t frugality—it’s a betrayal of the very intergenerational compact that built their comfort. By refusing to pass on tangible blessings—whether wealth, wisdom, or a stable nation—they’ve pulled the ladder up behind them, then blamed younger generations for not climbing faster.

Yet the younger generations, drowning in student debt and gig-economy precarity, have responded with a dangerous fatalism. “If the system’s rigged, why play the game?” They’ll drop $8 on artisanal coffee daily but shrug at saving for retirement, joking, “I’ll just work until I die.” They’ll chase bucket-list experiences and “self-care” splurges while ignoring the storm clouds of entitlement-program insolvency and their own personal pile of debt. Social media fuels this, turning life into a highlight reel of curated moments—while 401(k)s gather dust and credit card balances balloon. This isn’t living “in the moment”; it’s a surrender to despair disguised as liberation. When the future feels like a collapsing tunnel, hedonism becomes the anesthesia.

Together, these postures form a doom loop. The older generation, fixated on self-preservation, drain reservoirs of generational wealth that took lifetimes to build. Meanwhile, younger adults, convinced there’s no reservoir left to fill, puncture the pipes altogether. Families fracture over inheritances; communities starve for long-term investment; politicians kick fiscal time bombs down the road. The result? A society with no one planting orchards—just two generations arguing over who gets the last ripe apple. Fixing this demands a moral revolution: the older generation must recover the lost art of legacy, viewing wealth as a bridge, not a bunker. The young must reject the lie that foresight is futile, trading cynicism for gritty, stubborn hope. Without both, we’ll keep racing toward the cliff all wondering who killed the horizon.

The Bible is a manifesto of radical long-term vision. Joseph didn’t hoard grain for a week—he stockpiled it for seven years to save nations from starvation. Abraham followed God into the unknown, trusting a promise that would unfold over millennia. Jesus spoke of vineyards and vineyards and fig trees, of investments that compound across generations. Scripture doesn’t whisper about patience—it roars. It dares us to see time as God’s gift, not our enemy. Every parable of sowing and reaping, every prophet who stood alone for truth, every martyr who chose death over compromise shouts this: There is sacred power in what grows slowly. The Kingdom isn’t built by the hurried, but by the steadfast—those who dig wells in deserts they’ll never drink from, who plant oaks in storms they’ll never take shade under.

Consider Noah, hammering a monstrous ark for a flood no one believed would come. Imagine the jeers, the mockery, the relentless pressure to quit. He labored for a century, a laughingstock to neighbors who drowned clutching their distractions. Or the prophet Daniel, who refused to bend to Babylon’s culture of compromise, praying toward Jerusalem three times a day as an old man, his faithfulness still shaping nations centuries later. These weren’t optimists—they were obstinate, God-drunk realists who bet their lives on a Story bigger than their lifespan.

Even Jesus modeled this. He spent thirty years in obscurity—a carpenter, not a celebrity—before three years of ministry that changed everything. He healed beggars who’d die again, fed crowds who’d betray Him, and poured His life into twelve men who fled at the first sign of real danger. Why? Because He saw the harvest: billions yet unborn, grafted into His Kingdom through those shaky, stumbling disciples. He traded immediate relevance for eternal impact.

This is our charge: Stop living like an expiration date stamps your forehead. You are eternal. Your choices echo. That dollar you blew on trash? It could’ve paid down your debt. That hour you lost to mindless noise? It could’ve prayed down revival on your grandchildren. The church isn’t a buffet for your comfort—it’s an army training for a war that outlives us all. Imagine families saving to uplift their unborn great-grandchildren. Imagine businesses that prioritize pensions over profit margins. Imagine politicians passing laws that won’t win votes but will save cities. This is the path. Fight for it.

But how? Start by smashing the idols of now. Replace “What’s in it for me?” with “What’s in it for them?”—the “them” being the faces you’ll never see this side of Heaven. Train your children to view money as a seed, not a snack. Teach them to tithe not just from their allowance, but from their inheritance. Fight for a marriage that models grit, not just romance, so your great-grandkids inherit a blueprint for covenant, not chaos. Build a business that funds your family long after you’re gone.

And when the grind feels futile—when the savings account grows too slow, the prodigal child still strays, or the culture keeps spinning madder—remember the martyrs. They died singing, their blood watering fields of faith we now walk in. Their sacrifice wasn’t for applause but for a reward they’d only claim in eternity. This is the muscle memory we’ve lost: suffering with purpose, waiting with expectation, laboring with joy for a timeline we won’t control.

The world will call you a fool. Let them. Let them chase their shadows while you build altars. Let them binge their distractions while you kneel in intercession for generations unborn. Let them sell their souls for relevance while you etch truth into the walls of eternity. You are not here to be remembered. You are here to be faithful.

The fire of eternity burns in your bones. Don’t let the trivial consume you. Live like you’ll live forever.

Because you will.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King

Meet The judge who recently denied a request to release transcripts from a key grooming gang trial

 Meet Justice Jonathan Rose.

By The stark naked brief

The judge who recently denied a request to release transcripts from a key grooming gang trial—arguing that doing so would be “contrary to the public interest.” The request, submitted by Open Justice, sought access to the full transcript from a 2016 trial at Bradford Crown Court, where twelve men were convicted of sexually exploiting a teenage girl in Keighley. Over 8 years ago. Bradford has long been a hotspot for some of the country’s most insidious grooming/r*pe gang cases. Underage girls were abused while living in children’s care homes—a place you’d expect to find not just protection, but over-protection, if anything. In another case, a 13-year-old girl was exploited by as many as 100 men. Rose further justified the refusal, claiming: “the context of the public debate now taking place in general concerning cases such as this, which are said to be part of a currency of offending in this city and elsewhere.” Apparently, use of the transcripts amid wider public discussion is not in the public interest. Open Justice's head, Adam Wren, said that crucial information has been “censored,” and that the release of court proceedings has a clear public interest element. The question begs: how in the hell are we supposed to prevent this from happening again if we can't see the details of what happened in the first place?

MP Raises Migrant Harassment of British Women

In A recent Tweeton X MP Rupert Lowe  Stated the following 

" Why are women feeling increasingly unsafe on our streets? A question all MPs know the answer to, but barely any will admit. Well, let’s be honest.

There is a rapidly growing problem of foreign men harassing, intimidating and assaulting women with no care to the consequences. We all know it. It’s the case in my constituency, and it’s happening all over the country. But nobody in any position of authority seems to care? And it’s not just illegal migrants, although that is a significant contributing factor. It’s often those here legally. We invited these males into our country, and they have repaid that hospitality by hounding and tormenting women. Of course, British men can be awful to women. Nobody is suggesting otherwise. But we all know the rapidly growing problem is disproportionately foreign males, particularly in certain areas of the country where the law seems to be almost entirely abandoned. Walk around London. Do you feel safe, honestly? It wasn’t like this, even ten years ago. It’s grim. I can only imagine how women feel walking alone around parts of our capital city. Not even at night, in broad daylight too. Gangs of foreign men just hanging around town, acting like they own the streets, are now just tolerated? Spitting, drinking, shouting, harassing, intimidating, even assaulting. No. Enough. It’s getting worse and worse and worse. I’ll get called all sorts of names for daring to state the obvious, but it’s all true. And those throwing the insults know it, or live in some leafy Surrey village which hasn’t yet been touched by all of these new cultures we’re told to warmly welcome with open arms. Almost all politicians are too scared to say any of this. Everybody can see what’s going on. So why won’t MPs say so? It doesn’t have to be like this. Deport every single illegal migrant. If a legal migrant breaks the law, deport them. Not fulfilling visa conditions, eg not working, then deport them. Drastically slash legal immigration, putting countries on a ‘red list’ where there is substantial evidence that those cultures do not respect women and their citizens are disproportionately likely to cause issues in our country. We need to crack down on this behaviour from all. But when it’s foreign nationals involved, that is a problem that did not need to happen. Those men did not need to be in our country, nor do they. I don’t want to sacrifice women’s safety to satisfy multiculturalism. We have a culture, and it works. It treats women with respect - many others simply do not. We should not pretend otherwise. This is all now treated as normal. NONE of this is normal. Women deserve to feel safe on their own streets, without fear of being harassed by foreign men. We must end the era of mass immigration, and make Britain safe again".

Vicar DESTROYS Historian David Starkey's Criticisms of Christianity

With reason, argument and inconvenient facts, Church of England rev with a difference Jamie Franklin EXPLODES historian David Starkey's recent assault on Christianity given on Andrew Gold's Heretics podcast. Franklin explains how the MYTH of the Christian Dark Ages was created by ideologically driven sceptics, and he explains how the notions of human dignity and equality were CREATED by Christianity and cannot survive without them!

MP Highlights Not one person has been convicted for covering up the Rape Gangs

In a Tweet on X, MP Rupert Lowe stated
 "Not one person has been convicted for covering up the rape gangs. In my view, those who knew, and failed to act, are as guilty as the rapists themselves.

We have some idea of the scale of the rape. In certain towns, it was commonplace. In certain communities, it was rife. And yes, they were/are mainly tight-knit Pakistani communities. It is simply not credible to suggest that such industrial rape could occur without other members of said community knowing about it. Thousands and thousands knew, but did nothing. That’s just a fact. Of course this cowardice spreads beyond those groups. Into police forces, social services, the legal system, local politics and more. People, with the authority to act, knew and did nothing. Our inquiry will ask the questions that have been avoided for decades: Who knew what was happening? Who said nothing? Who made the decision to let it carry on? What can be done about it? We will explore, in detail, the policies and legal options available to deal with the complicit. That includes the feasibility of prosecution, the possibility of revoking citizenship, and the grounds for deportation in cases of proven complicity. This isn’t ‘guilt by association’. It is facilitation. It must carry legal consequences."

Why There Will Be No Inquiry Into the Pakistani Rape Gangs The Left Despises the Working Class By The Jolly Heretic  It’s no exaggeration to say that the Pakistani Grooming Scandal is probably the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil at the hands of foreigners since the Harrying of the North in winter 1069 to 1070. In that winter, William the Conqueror brutally subjugated the north of England. Over the last 30 years, a new conquering force has attacked the rebellious northlands: Many thousands of vulnerable, working-class English girls were groomed with alcohol and drugs and then raped by numerous Pakistani men, passed around as though they were sweets. The Jolly Heretic is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid The horrific details – some of the girls were as young as 9, air pumps were used to widen their anuses, baseball bats were inserted into their vaginas, a girl was killed and sold to the community as kebab meat – only underscore the fact that this was a war crime as old as war itself: Men from another tribe invade and take the females as war booty, raping them to humiliate the males of the defeated tribe, to taunt them about their failure to defend their women. But the metaphor doesn’t work. These men were invited into England by the Labour Party, once the party of the working class, founded in part on the Trade Union Movement and Nonconformist churches that were popular among workers. These horrors took place in overwhelmingly Labour-voting areas – working-class, ex-industrial towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale, with no “white privilege” there – and were covered up, ignored, or downplayed by the authorities, including Labour-voting social workers, partly to protect the Pakistanis and the sacred dogma of “multiculturalism”. Elon Musk finally forced the country to confront what had happened, yet Labour minister Jess Phillips announced this week that there would be no public enquiry into the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil since the eleventh century. The reason the Labour government doesn’t want an enquiry is obvious. It will reveal, in shameful detail, the extent to which Labour Party members were involved in turning a blind eye to, covering up, and enabling the Pakistani rape gangs. It will place in sharp relief something we all know deep down: the Labour Party despises the white working class. In 2014, Labour Shadow Minister Emily Thornberry tweeted a picture of a council house in Rochester with an English flag hanging from it and a tradesman’s white van parked in front. She didn’t comment, nor did she need to. It was her snobbish way of expressing contempt for the English working class, and it was so obvious that she was forced to resign. Why does the left hate the English working class so much? Part of the reason is that a divide that once existed on the left has collapsed. Even in the 1980s, Labour parliamentarians included actual working-class people, almost always trade unionists, as well as left-wing middle-class people associated with the Fabian Society. Due in part to the egalitarian policies Labour pushed for after the war, such as free university education and grammar schools, clever working-class children were able to move into the middle class. Intelligence is about 80% genetic, so this period of social mobility could only be temporary. It produced a series of prime ministers from working- or lower-middle-class backgrounds – Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major – but then we returned to prime ministers who were mostly privately educated or at least from upper-middle-class backgrounds. Since intelligence predicts political participation, the remaining working class essentially stopped being involved in the Labour Party. Moreover, low intelligence is associated with disliking change and being highly instinctive, with instincts including ethnocentrism. Accordingly, the remaining working class, regardless of their social behaviour, were not interested in the joys of diversity, not least because it directly undermined their wages. So, all that remained were middle-class leftists, non-working-class people who would have us believe they are so kind and motivated by fairness that they want to help the working class. Except they don’t. The working class is a means to an end for such people. In his book Swearing in English, linguistics scholar Anthony McEnery explores the origins of the middle class. Even in the sixteenth century, their position in society was clear. Deep down, they aspired to be upper class and resented that they were not. They feared falling into the working class and being perceived as part of it. They dealt with this through virtue- and purity-signalling. They asserted they were more moral than the degenerate working class or the decadent upper class. They were more religious, for example, and thus were the engines of Lollardy and Protestantism. Indeed, every moral panic you can think of – from Puritanism to Black Lives Matter – has ultimately been middle-class people vying for status, trying to seem more moral than others. Which social class, for example, do you think uses the word “fuck” the least? Within this inherently insecure class, some are more insecure than others. In a right-wing society, they purity-signal to appear more moral than everyone else. In a left-wing one, they virtue-signal. As I explore in my book Woke Eugenics, numerous convergent studies on the psychology of leftists show they are high in mental instability, meaning deep down they hate themselves. They fear others, are socially anxious, and are jealous and resentful. As a result, they are high in Machiavellianism; they want power and see people as merely a means to that end. They are narcissistic, creating a perfect, morally superior false self, and they crave adoration, which virtue-signalling can achieve. They are anti-tradition because they associate tradition with a power they feel they lack and to which they feel entitled. They fear a fair fight, so they vie for status covertly through virtue-signalling. And they identify with groups genetically distant from themselves – another family, class, or race – as this allows them to collaborate with outsiders to gain power over their own in-group, their own class. A good example is Tony Benn, formerly Anthony Wedgwood-Benn, Viscount Stansgate, who renounced his hereditary peerage. He belonged to a generation in which people like him gained power over their own class by collaborating with the English working class. He was very rich, espoused redistribution, yet left his wealth to his own family. But since competitive virtue-signalling is required, once England began admitting non-white people – who were “marginalised” compared to long-settled white people – it became more virtuous to identify with them than with the white working class. The latter were genetically closer to the self and less easy to romanticise, as most of their intelligent members had by then been absorbed into the middle class. As such, the working class induced disgust in the left, and insofar as they were conservative, the working class became enemies of narcissistic people who felt inherently entitled to power. The working class had the temerity to question those who felt entitled to be worshipped. Foreigners, of course, would vote for the left because the left would give them other people’s money, and the middle-class left, being congenital traitors, would promote their interests and receive power and narcissistic supply in return. Foreigners would also vote for the left because they are anti-nationalistic, and nationalism is the last thing you want if you’re a foreigner. From this, a new leftism emerged wherein morality was associated with being pro-multiculturalism and, through competitive virtue-signalling, eventually anti-white. Of course, the left knew their own hypocrisy: the working-class English confronted them with the fact that they don’t really care about the poor or anyone else. These poor people’s lives have worsened due to multiculturalism. The left’s policies – such as turning natural and adaptive ethnocentrism into the worst possible heresy and attacking traditional moral values that condemn promiscuity and pre-marital sex – led to this war crime. The resulting cognitive dissonance took several forms: dehumanising the victim class as scum, blaming the victims for being promiscuous even though they were under-age, and covering up what happened because their sense of moral superiority stems from being highly pro-multiculturalism. If that’s undermined, so is the justification for their power and their narcissistic supply. It all collapses. This is why Labour does not want an enquiry into this war crime. They despise the English working class. They’d frankly rather they all just died. For more based-science analysis of society and politics, become a subscriber at JollyHeretic.com!

The greatest speech which Enoch Powell ever made in parliament

Enoch Powell was a magnificent parliamentarian, a man who makes the present generation of politicians in Britain look like ignorant pygmies.