In a recent Tweet Rupert Lowe MP slams Nigel Fartarge for what in my opinion is selling out to the establishment.
It’s depressing to hear Farage echoing the same fearful rhetoric we’ve heard for decades. He states if we ‘politically alienate’ Islam ‘we will lose’ - he gives a year of 2050 for a ‘terrible state’ we’ll potentially be in. It’s this fatalistic, defeatist thinking that has crippled Western resolve for so many long years - cowardice led us into this mess, it will certainly not lead us out.
This is not a question of alienating individuals, or of disrespecting peaceful law-abiding Muslims. It’s about whether Western democracies still possess the confidence and the courage to robustly defend our values, in the same way Muslim countries do, or whether we must now shape our politics and our whole way of life in order to avoid offending a particular religion. I say we must not.
What does Farage mean when he says ‘we will lose’? If Western nations must compromise every political stance, censor honest debate, and soften our principles simply to avoid upsetting Islam, then we’ve already lost.
In just one example - we allow the brutally cruel non-stun slaughter of millions and millions of animals every year, tearing up decades of animal welfare legislation in order to respect religious ‘rights’. Why do we tolerate it? In Britain, we treat our animals with care and respect. Halal slaughter does not, and therefore should be banned. Will that happen? Of course not - all major political parties silently and glumly just accept it.
For far too long, crippling fear has dominated conversations around Islam. In the process, we have created a climate where genuine concerns about integration, extremism, and parallel societies/systems are dismissed as ‘racist’ or ‘Islamophobic’. We’ve all seen the very dark places where that bleak attitude can lead - it does not end well, at all.
Farage’s warning is not a new one - it’s a boring repetition of the same cowardice that has allowed countless European cities to change beyond recognition, for free speech to be radically undermined, and for our liberal values to be eroded away all in the name of ‘multiculturalism’.
I don’t want multiculturalism. We have a culture, and it works just fine. One that respects women, values free speech, rewards hard work and treats everyone equally under the law. We don’t need parallel systems or separate rules that directly clash with our way of life.
Our civilisation should not be held hostage by the cultural sensitivities of any belief system - especially one that, in its most politicised form, has already shown a total unwillingness to reciprocate the tolerance we have gifted to it. I would argue that in certain parts of the country, many followers of Islam have already ‘politically alienated’ themselves by electing openly sectarian MPs who are willing to reduce the rape gang scandal to a ‘false right-wing narrative’ and who hold infinitely more passion for Gaza than their own neglected constituencies. For many, their sympathies and loyalties simply lie elsewhere - a sad, but sobering fact.
Farage believes that the political cost of defending British values is too high, finding himself in emphatic agreement with the rotten establishment consensus. That’s his choice. My view? Our values are worth protecting, even if it’s politically inconvenient.
For decades, politicians from all parties have pathetically tiptoed around the integration debate, terrified of the vile backlash. My view? Maturity is finally needed, honesty is finally needed, courage is finally needed.
Because if Britain, and its MPs, won’t robustly and relentlessly defend its values, we will all lose far more than a debate.
