Incidentally, it was another female police officer who threw the first punch in this insane altercation.
Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Search This Blog
FREEDOM NEWS HOME PAGE
Saturday, 12 July 2025
Incidentally, it was another female police officer who threw the first punch in this insane altercation.
Incidentally, it was another female police officer who threw the first punch in this insane altercation.
One of our most ancient freedoms is under threat. Here’s why we should protect jury trials
One of our most ancient freedoms is under threat. Here’s why we should protect jury trials:
By
For years, Britain has been respected around the world for the quality and independence of its judiciary. Now, there are legitimate questions about whether those once-high standards are being maintained in every case. Too often we have seen judges making decisions that are totally out of step with the public’s instincts, whether on immigration, asylum or free speech. At a time when trust in the justice system is already in short supply, we cannot afford to dismantle this crucial safeguard. Yet that’s exactly what this Labour Government might be about to do. It’s no secret that Britain’s courts are a mess. After Covid, barristers’ strikes, and a marked rise in certain types of crime, the number of cases waiting for trial stands at a record high. Rape cases are now being scheduled as far away as 2029, a horrific delay in justice for victims. Shamefully, this backlog has only grown since Labour came to power, with 750 cases added every month. So what’s their plan to solve this crisis? If yesterday’s Leveson Review is anything to go by, they look set to provide yet more sentencing discounts, which could see criminals serve as little as 20 per cent of their sentence. The proposal to scrap jury trials in many cases is just as pernicious, eroding one of this country’s ancient liberties. According to Courts Minister Sarah Sackman, this is “an idea whose time has probably come”. By the report’s own admission, scrapping jury trials will only have a “limited impact” on the court backlog. It will save £31 million, amounting to just 0.2 per cent of the Ministry of Justice’s budget. And while the report only recommends scrapping jury trials in some cases, it also says that there is “no limit” to the cases that jury trials might be removed from in future. What’s more, it suggests giving judges a blanket power to decide which cases are too “complex” for juries to opine on. That’s a slippery slope which could end in the total abolition of jury trials. Scrapping this pillar of our constitution for the sake of (very limited) administrative convenience is a disgrace. Alongside parliamentary democracy, trial by jury ranks as one of this country’s greatest gifts to the world. Today, jury trials are one of the few ways in which ordinary members of the public can play a part in the justice system – a crucial safeguard against judicial overreach. In his report, Leveson invokes Lord Devlin, one of the greatest legal minds of the 20th century. Yet it was Lord Devlin who called jury trials “the lamp that shows that freedom lives”, noting that “no tyrant could ever afford to leave a subject’s freedom in the hands of 12 of his countrymen”. Devlin was correct. Jury trial has long ensured that the law can never stray too far from the common sense of the British public, reining in the mistaken impulses of an occasionally fallible judicial branch. Take the case of Jamie Michael, a former Royal Marine who was arrested after he posted a Facebook video urging people to organise peacefully against migrant hotels. He faced a jury at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court, who took just 17 minutes to clear him of stirring up racial hatred. While critics claim that juries are slow, the public can draw the line between clumsy anger and real incitement faster than any official. So why is the Government being so careless with one of our constitutional traditions? The answer is simply because the Labour Party thinks that judges always know best. We see it in their approach to the Chagos Islands, the European Convention on Human Rights and, now, in their willingness to scrap jury trials. For Keir Starmer, the rule of law simply equals rule by lawyers; it’s no surprise that these instincts are shared by his Labour colleagues. To paraphrase the philosopher Roger Scruton, trust in our justice system is easily destroyed, but not easily created. Jury trials must be left alone.
Robert Jenrick
For years, Britain has been respected around the world for the quality and independence of its judiciary. Now, there are legitimate questions about whether those once-high standards are being maintained in every case. Too often we have seen judges making decisions that are totally out of step with the public’s instincts, whether on immigration, asylum or free speech. At a time when trust in the justice system is already in short supply, we cannot afford to dismantle this crucial safeguard. Yet that’s exactly what this Labour Government might be about to do. It’s no secret that Britain’s courts are a mess. After Covid, barristers’ strikes, and a marked rise in certain types of crime, the number of cases waiting for trial stands at a record high. Rape cases are now being scheduled as far away as 2029, a horrific delay in justice for victims. Shamefully, this backlog has only grown since Labour came to power, with 750 cases added every month. So what’s their plan to solve this crisis? If yesterday’s Leveson Review is anything to go by, they look set to provide yet more sentencing discounts, which could see criminals serve as little as 20 per cent of their sentence. The proposal to scrap jury trials in many cases is just as pernicious, eroding one of this country’s ancient liberties. According to Courts Minister Sarah Sackman, this is “an idea whose time has probably come”. By the report’s own admission, scrapping jury trials will only have a “limited impact” on the court backlog. It will save £31 million, amounting to just 0.2 per cent of the Ministry of Justice’s budget. And while the report only recommends scrapping jury trials in some cases, it also says that there is “no limit” to the cases that jury trials might be removed from in future. What’s more, it suggests giving judges a blanket power to decide which cases are too “complex” for juries to opine on. That’s a slippery slope which could end in the total abolition of jury trials. Scrapping this pillar of our constitution for the sake of (very limited) administrative convenience is a disgrace. Alongside parliamentary democracy, trial by jury ranks as one of this country’s greatest gifts to the world. Today, jury trials are one of the few ways in which ordinary members of the public can play a part in the justice system – a crucial safeguard against judicial overreach. In his report, Leveson invokes Lord Devlin, one of the greatest legal minds of the 20th century. Yet it was Lord Devlin who called jury trials “the lamp that shows that freedom lives”, noting that “no tyrant could ever afford to leave a subject’s freedom in the hands of 12 of his countrymen”. Devlin was correct. Jury trial has long ensured that the law can never stray too far from the common sense of the British public, reining in the mistaken impulses of an occasionally fallible judicial branch. Take the case of Jamie Michael, a former Royal Marine who was arrested after he posted a Facebook video urging people to organise peacefully against migrant hotels. He faced a jury at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court, who took just 17 minutes to clear him of stirring up racial hatred. While critics claim that juries are slow, the public can draw the line between clumsy anger and real incitement faster than any official. So why is the Government being so careless with one of our constitutional traditions? The answer is simply because the Labour Party thinks that judges always know best. We see it in their approach to the Chagos Islands, the European Convention on Human Rights and, now, in their willingness to scrap jury trials. For Keir Starmer, the rule of law simply equals rule by lawyers; it’s no surprise that these instincts are shared by his Labour colleagues. To paraphrase the philosopher Roger Scruton, trust in our justice system is easily destroyed, but not easily created. Jury trials must be left alone.
Wednesday, 9 July 2025
Cradles and Coffins - Demographic Realities Nick Griffin Reviews the weeks News
Nick Griffins review of the week's news, plus a special focus on the harsh reality of the Great Dying. Please share to all your social Media .
God is an Englishman: Live interview with Bijan Omrani
- English national identity and its interplay with the Church of England.
- The aesthetic of English spirituality and its importance for Modernity.
- The role of establishment and why it is worth retaining.
- The implications of demographic change and the rise of Islam for the English Church and society.
/ irreverend
Buy Me a Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/irreverend
To make a direct donation or to get in touch with questions or comments please email irreverendpod@gmail.com!
Notices:
Daniel French Substack: https://undergroundchurch.substack.com/
Jamie Franklin Substack: https://jamiefranklin.substack.com
Irreverend Substack: https://irreverendpod.substack.com
Follow us on Twitter: https://x.com/IrreverendPod
Find me a church: https://irreverendpod.com/church-finder/
Join our Irreverend Telegram group: https://t.me/irreverendpod
Find links to our episodes, social media accounts and much more https://www.irreverendpod.com!
Thursday Circles: http://thursdaycircle.comMonday, 7 July 2025
Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Masoud Pezeshkian
Masoud Pezeshkian, president of Iran.
Follow Tucker on X: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson
Text “TUCKER” to 44055 for exclusive updates.
Chapters:
0:00 How Would Iranian President Pezeshkian Like to See This Conflict End?
0:44 Is Iran Willing to Give Up Their Nuclear Program in Exchange for Peace?
5:19 Was the International Atomic Energy Agency Spying on Iran and Giving Information to Israel?
7:04 Is Iran Open to Diplomacy?
11:55 Has the Israeli Government Tried to Assassinate the Iranian President?
15:54 Should Americans Be Afraid of Iran?
18:03 The Ayatollah’s Religious Decree Against Donald Trump
18:11 Has Iran Ever Tried to Assassinate Trump?
19:44 Are There Iranian Sleeper Cells in the United States?
21:33 What Happened to the Relationship Between Iran and Israel?
23:23 Sanctions and American Business in Iran
25:58 If War Breaks Out With Iran, Would They Receive Assistance From Russia and China?
Sunday, 6 July 2025
The ROTTEN Banking System Stealing From You - YOUR SAVINGS ARE NOT SAFE!
/ godfreybloomofficial
Twitter:
/ goddersbloom
UNCENSORED Channels:
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@GodfreyBloom:6
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/GodfreyBloomOffi...
PHYISCAL GOLD - PROTECT Your Wealth - Become Informed!
Website: http://godfreybloom.uk/gold
BOOKS:
Magic Of Banking: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Magic-Bankin...
Billy Nomates: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Billy-Nomate...
Dinosaurs Guide: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dinosaurs-Gu...
Guinea a Minute: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Guinea-Minut...
Godfrey Bloom is a libertarian author with six books published on both military history & Austrian School Economics. He worked in the City of London where he won an international prize for fund management. He represented Yorkshire & Lincolnshire in the European Parliament. During his term of office he attracted over sixty million views on his chamber speeches exposing State bank & tax malpractice on Facebook & You Tube. Thought to be an all time record. He brought experience if not influence to the mainly lay EU Parliamentary Monetary & Economic Affairs Committee, putting both members & European Central Bank President under unaccustomed pressure. Godfrey Bloom is holder of the Territorial Decoration & bar, Sovereign’s Medal, Armed Forces Parliamentary Medal & European Parliamentary silver medal. He is married to one of Europe’s leading equine physiotherapists.Saturday, 5 July 2025
Biblical Teaching on Perversion
In A recent statement on X a Evangelist has stated the following concerning Biblical tea hings on the issue of the sodomites and sexual perverts . What he said is as follows concerning the sermon on the subject by Pastor Anderson of the faithful word baptist church USA.
To those who are interested,
I want to take a moment to address some recent developments concerning the Men’s Preaching Night last Sunday. I will not apologize for preaching the Word of God. I will not apologize for stating facts. I will not negotiate with terrorists, among whom the LGBTHIV crowd is full of domestic terrorists. The Bible is crystal clear that sodomites (homosexuals) deserve the death penalty carried out by a government that actually cares about the law of God. We are not to take the law into our own hands. Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. The Bible also teaches that sodomites (homosexuals) can never be saved since they hate God and they don’t even want to retain God in their knowledge. Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Romans 1:30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Christians need to hate those people who hate God. Psalm 139:21–22 Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. In addition, the Bible teaches that they will be burning in hell forever. Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Jesus teaches that if anyone harms little children, it is better for them to drown themselves (commit suicide). Matthew 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. The Bible says that the sodomites (homosexuals) are filled with all unrighteousness. That’s why I believe all sodomites are capable of molesting children and committing all kinds of wickedness. It is hilarious that the best thing they can say to us is that we are closet homos, because they know being a homo is filthy and vile and disgusting. Romans 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Sure Foundation Baptist Church is a Bible-believing church. Whatever the Bible says, we believe it. We don’t care about what the world, culture, or media think. It is funny that these so-called “faith leaders” and some “Christians” do not approve of this message. This simply shows me that they do not care about the Bible. Sure Foundation Baptist Church protects children from predators. We don’t separate children from their families. We expose perverts and pedophiles. No homos will ever be allowed to attend any church services. Sure Foundation Baptist Church is a soulwinning powerhouse. We preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and the eternal security of the believer on a weekly basis to the lost and dying world, while all those “holier than thou” Christians let the world go to hell. If you are sick and tired of the woke culture or churches that do not preach the whole Bible, then you should come and check us out! God bless the faithful men of God! God bless Sure Foundation Baptist Church! Evangelist Justin ZhongWednesday, 2 July 2025
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



