The Laughter of Our Children
The demographic base of the Saving Revolution
|
|
The power of compound arithmetic is as awesome in demographics as it is in the world of finance. Just as compound interest can ruin the borrower and make the already wealthy fabulously rich, so the impact of demographic change compounded through as little as three generations can destroy a seemingly unchallengeable majority and set a new people in their place.
To illustrate this, let us do some very rough and ready maths with the very different birth rates of American liberals and their diametric opposites in the grassroots Protestant ‘Quiverfull’ movement.
 |
Do please bear in mind as you read this that it is not intended to be a precise blueprint for the overall resistance movement which it is our sacred duty to assist in building. Its purpose is to illustrate the awesome power of demography to change politics and history, and to inspire you and all our readers to make the personal choices which will enable you to ‘do your bit’.
That may be by raising a large family yourself, being part of the education of young members of your extended family, helping to build a broader, Christian nationalist community in which families can thrive, or providing the Templar Order with resources to advance our own work in this vital field. Whichever route or combination of routes you decide upon, you will be helping, among other things, to spread the ideas and life-giving efforts described in this chapter to a wider audience. You will be a soldier in the demographic war against the liberal plague.
Let us start by considering the liberals. While these deluded but dangerous creatures may be found in all walks of life, they are naturally concentrated in certain professions. Pause and think for a moment on them. If you had to predict which occupations would contain the highest proportion of liberals, which would you choose?
Whatever your own precise list, I am sure that we can agree that journalists, higher education professors, advertising agency staff and ‘community activists’ could all easily feature in such a rogues’ gallery. This experiment is not meant to be either scientific or comprehensive, so if by chance you thought of some other occupations, don’t worry.
Now let’s take a brief look at how many people work in those jobs. For the sake of this illustration, we will examine the situation in the United States, although the remarkable lesson it teaches about the demographic power of differential birth rates is valid in every country, among every population on earth, and for all time.
Despite their enormous - and overwhelmingly baneful – influence, there are only 31,000 journalists (including those who broadcast their lies on TV and radio) in the USA, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The figures from the National Center for Education Statistics reveal that America’s ‘presstitutes’ are massively outnumbered by the people who run the country’s other great brainwashing operation – higher education. In 2018, and including part-timers, there were1,500,000 professors, assistant professors, instructors, lecturers and assorted either ‘educators’ working in degree-granting post-secondary institutions.
According to Statista, there were close to 189,000 people working in US advertising agencies in 2015. In all probability, that figure has grown since then, so let’s round up the figure for the individuals who produce the vile propaganda of the Woke corporations – and, to be fair, sometimes help market things which are actually useful, occasionally without promoting homosexuality or miscegenation - to 200,000.
There’s no need to round up the number of lawyers, however, because there are already far too many of them. Out of our four highlighted occupations, the law is probably the least intrinsically liberal, but conservative lawyers will readily admit to being very much in the minority. So, for the sake of this study, and with apologies to those who are unjustly labelled, we’re going to take the May 2018 figure from americanbar.org and lump all the USA’s 1,338,678 active, licensed attorneys in as liberals.
Finally, we get to ‘community activists’, where there are no doubt a goodly number who cannot be fairly classified as ‘liberals’ - for the simple reason that they are full-blown Communists. Before the notorious Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) was disgraced by revelations about its officials encouraging violence and criminality, the body which gave Obama his early lessons in revolutionary leftist agitation had over 500,000 members.
When ACORN was shut down in 2009 these activists and organisers didn’t go away. Instead, they set up a myriad of ostensibly independent local groups. To identify and count them is way beyond the scope of this study, but let us work on the basis that they have expanded their decentralised operations and have grown by 50%.
That would give us a total of 750,000 hard core and very experienced liberal-left fanatics. While there are, of course, many other bodies out there – including many other groups funded by the Soros Open Society operation – this figure will serve us well in our dive into demographics.
Totting up the numbers for those who make up the dark heart of the American left, we get a figure just shy of 3,820,000. It is not easy to find out how many trade union officials there are in the USA, but it seems safe to assume that all the country’s overwhelmingly left-wing ‘labor organizers’ could be added in to our total and that we would still have some other ne’er-do-wells to add in before we reached a grand total of 4,000,000. The barking mad staff of all the country’s HR departments can surely be squeezed in as well.
Four million liberal-leftists. They are not alone of course; there are many other liberals and leftists occupying many other key positions in society. And many of the ‘commanding heights’ of the economy, particularly in finance and corporate boardrooms, are hardcore right-wingers in economic terms, yet are every bit as dangerous to the social fabric and moral health of the nation.
But if those four million were to vanish, America’s coming dark night of repression, collective insanity, hatred and ultimate disaster simply could not take place, because the left simply would not have the cadres - the officer class - necessary to steamroller through their revolutionary agenda.
As a matter of fact, if those four million disappeared, and were replaced by four million right-wing Christians, then even without taking away Joe Biden’s millions of fraudulent votes, the 81 million allegedly cast for the Democrats would slip to 77 million, while the 74 million genuinely given to Donald Trump would rise to 78 million.
So how are we going to kill four million liberal? We’re not. In fact, we’re not going to kill a single one of them (unless they start a civil war, in which case they’re liable to get what they’d be asking for). They are going to kill themselves.
 |
How many of these will have children? And, of the few who do, how many will have only one? The 21st century is set to be one giant ‘slection event’ eliminating the genes that leave people susceptible to the disease of liberalism
And where could America find an extra four million conservative Christians to replace them? By making them, by having children and rearing them right.
So now let us turn to the Christians. Not to all America’s Christians although, collectively, they are clearly a major part of the reason for the increasing divergence between the birth rates of Blue and Red States, with Republican states, and Republican counties in Democrat states, all showing markedly healthier population growth than their Democrat counterparts – despite the latter’s higher numbers of Third World immigrants.
This phenomenon is now well recognised. An article headlined The Conservative Fertility Advantage, published on November 18th 2020 by the Institute for Family Studies provided a good overview, concluding:
‘In the 1970s, there was little or no difference in fertility rates between liberal and conservative women. But by the 2000s, completed fertility for liberal women had declined markedly below that of conservative women. In recent years, the gap in childbearing between young conservative and liberal women has really opened, which may portend a bigger gap in the coming years.’
But, as already explained, this experiment does not involve the broad mass of Christian Americans. Welcome though their relatively healthy and natural attitude to families is, we wouldn’t even need them if we settled down seriously to do the job ourselves. Because you are about to find out how four million liberals can be out-bred and replaced by 20,000 conservatives – within one lifetime.
Admittedly, we are talking about rather unusual Christians. Or, as could be said more accurately, the unusually Christian Christians of the Quiverfull movement.
The name comes from Psalm 127:3-5
3 Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
4 As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth.
5 Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
That ‘speak with’, it should be noted, is something of a euphemism, it means to kick the cr*p out of them. So a large family is seen as a quiver full of arrows, ready to be fired at the enemies of your folk and of our Lord. Hence the Quiverfull movement encourages couples to marry young and to have as many children as God decides they should have.
This sub-group of evangelical Protestants, with their main distinguishing feature being opposition to contraception, first came to the attention of a horrified and scornful liberal media elite in the early years of this century.
One of the more balanced articles was written by Kathryn Joyce for the liberal-leaning The Nation, in November 2006. Entitled Arrows for the War, this explains that:
‘Quiverfull began with the publication of Rick and Jan Hess’s 1989 book, A Full Quiver: Family Planning and the Lordship of Christ. This argues that God, as the ‘Great Physician’ and sole ‘Birth Controller,’ opens and closes the womb on a case-by-case basis. Women’s attempts to control their own bodies – the Lord’s temple – are an illegitimate seizure of divine power.
As with all the critical liberal coverage of the movement, the piece focused on the financial strains of having a large family. Joyce did, however, allow that ‘for many Quiverfull mothers, this struggle is still preferable to the alternatives they see society offering working-class women – alternatives they see as the fruit of secular feminism. For poor women, the feminist fight for job equality won them no career path but rather the right to pink-collar labor, as a housekeeper, a waitress, a clerk. The sexual revolution did not bring them self-exploration and fulfilment but rather loosened the social restraints that bound men to the household as husbands and fathers.’
Looking to the future, the article spoke of ‘…. Pundits warning of a coming “demographic divide,” wherein fecund red staters will far outnumber barren blue state liberals, are further ratcheting up interest in fertility politics.’
Quiverfull adherents base their rejection of birth control upon the belief that the Genesis creation and post–Flood Bible passages to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ are un-rescinded biblical commandments. Founding theorist Charles D. Provan pointed out that:
‘”Be fruitful and multiply”... is a command of God, indeed the first command to a married couple. Birth control obviously involves disobedience to this command, for birth control attempts to prevent being fruitful and multiplying. Therefore birth control is wrong, because it involves disobedience to the Word of God. Nowhere is this command done away with in the entire Bible; therefore it still remains valid for us today.’
Rick and Jan Hess argued for this belief in their 1990 book A Full Quiver – family planning and the Lordship of Christ:
‘”Behold, children are a gift of the Lord.” (Psalms. 127:3) Do we really believe that? If children are a gift from God, let’s for the sake of argument ask ourselves what other gift or blessing from God we would reject. Money? Would we reject great wealth if God gave it? Not likely! How about good health? Many would say that a man’s health is his most treasured possession. But children? Even children given by God? “That’s different!” some will plead! All right, is it different? God states right here in no-nonsense language that children are gifts. Do we believe His Word to be true?’
 |
Poster family for the Quiverfull movement. A reminder of what a normal family can and should look like in an age of good medicine if only contraception is rejected. Of course, it’s an ideal which few will attain in reality, but three or four children are still enough to be part of the solution
A Quiverfull adherent was quoted in the 1991 Calgary Herald as saying: ‘Children are made in God’s image, and the enemy hates that image, so the more of them he can prevent from being born, the more he likes it.’
While the Quiverfull movement is the best known example of such ideas being put into practice within the mainstream Protestant population of the United States, the same principles are of course to be found among traditionalist Roman Catholics. Most recognised of all, the Amish birth rate is consistently high enough to allow their population to double approximately every twenty years.
Other fundamentalist movements that grow through internal reproduction and membership retention include Laestadian Lutherans in Finland, certain Orthodox communities in Russia, Mennonites in both North and South America, and ultra-Orthodox Jews worldwide. Wherever and whoever they are, however, such groups are thriving as the birth rate of seculars and moderates plummets below replacement levels.
Returning to Quiverfull, the Nation article already quoted noted that ‘though there are no exact figures for the size of the movement, the number of families that identify as Quiverfull is likely in the thousands to low tens of thousands.’
Since that was published in 2006, the movement has – for various reasons – taken a rather lower profile. But, rather like the ACORN people on the other side of the fence, they haven’t gone away. And even if they had, their example and achievements have already shown us the way forward.
What follows is, of course, a radical over-simplification. To be really accurate, all sorts of things would need to be taken into account. The proportion of Quiverfull children who go on to drop out would have to be considered alongside the numbers of new recruits. The shock of losing political control and cultural dominance is likely to reduce the confidence and birth rate of White ‘normies’, but we do not yet know whether such a trend would spill over to depress Quiverfull families as well. It is at least as likely to result in more people concluding that their radical break with liberal norms represents the best way forward, leading to a fresh wave of rapid growth.
Meanwhile, the likelihood that the liberal birth rate is actually much lower even than the White average would need to be explored. It is very likely that the sheer unnatural nature of the ugliness of where the liberals are headed will crash it even further. Every aspect of their poisonous ideology tends to reduce not only the numbers, but also the quality and operational effectiveness of their offspring.
Even that wouldn’t make liberalism vanish. Because most of the liberal occupations are well paid, the System will always be able to recruit new liberals from the general population. After all, there are many millions more Democrat voters. But they will be forced to recruit from a shrinking and less competent pool, because Democrat policies and the inherent trends of corporate capitalism are steadily replacing their old adherents with South Americans and Africans.
For the sake of this study, though, let us agree to keep things simple and assume that all such variations tend to cancel each other out, leaving the demographic impact of exponential growth and shrinkage to drive the engine of history.
Remember that the fundamental purpose of this study is simply to illustrate the speed at which differential birth rates change the make-up of, and power relations between, the populations involved. Above all, remember that these figures and the plan they present to us are not some ethno-political version of a network marketing sales pitch. These figures are not plucked-from-the-air, real-life impossibilities. They are the actual reality of the birth rates of liberals on one side, and the Christian families of the Quiverfull movement.
The liberal birth rate is at least as low as assumed. Further, there are certainly many more than ten thousand Christian families in the USA right now, who have already had - and continue to have - children at and above the rate required to make our example realistic. You may not want to do it; for some reason you may not be able to do it, but do not pretend it cannot be done, because it is already being done as you read this.
The very title of this chapter is taken from a successful ‘long war’ by a people who – alongside a brutal armed struggle – simply bred their way from oppressed minority to dominant majority. ’Our revenge will be the laughter of our children’ was the inspirational phrase coined by Bobby Sands.
Jailed for possession of firearms after a shoot-out with the security forces, Sands was a volunteer in the Irish Republican Army. Imprisoned for a term of 14 years, he went on hunger strike in an effort to secure political status. While on hunger strike, he was elected as a Member of Parliament by the heavily radicalised Catholic nationalists of Fermanagh and South Tyrone.
Bobby Sands died after 66 days without food. He became one of the most famous martyrs of the Irish freedom struggle. Former fellow IRA gunmen now sit in the government which used to condemn them as terrorists. But while the loyalist Protestants on the other side of the sectarian gulf called him and his IRA comrades ‘baby killers’ the truth is that his people won their Long War not by killing the children of their enemies, but by breeding more children of their own.
When Northern Ireland was created by the partition of Ireland in 1921, Catholics made up one third of the population. With continual large-scale emigration, and with the Protestant community also tending to have large families, the proportion stayed steadily until the early 1960s. Then the Protestant churches largely endorsed the contraceptive pill, while the Catholic Church held out against it, and everything changed.
Even though Northern Ireland’s Catholics collectively never achieved the birth rate of the Quiverfull movement, it now took them just forty years to go from being just over one-third of the population to become the absolute majority in 2021.
They would have achieved this even quicker if the young men and women who threw away their lives in futile and immoral (for there were other ways forward open to them even in the darkest times of discrimination) armed struggle, had gone the Quiverfull route. Having spent much of his young life on the run or in prison, Sands only had one child himself. What a waste of a talented poet and heroic idealist!
So please don’t tell me that out-breeding the other side isn’t possible, or that only Muslims can do it. Because the laughter of Catholic children in Belfast streets which used to be Protestant provides absolute proof that it works for people just like us.
Now let us come to the maths (as my American readers would also say, if the Scotch-Irish Over the Mountain Men, English Puritans and Scottish Covenanters who had settled there by the 18th century, hadn’t bred more children than King George could hire German mercenaries, and taught them to fear naught but God and to shoot straight into the bargain).
We have calculated that the cultural war battle stations of the main liberal professions are manned by four million people. Every demographic study confirms what we all know from personal experience and observation: they are overwhelmingly liberal and upper class and, as such, they have the lowest birth-rate of all of the USA’s 328 million people.
The exact figure is nigh-on impossible to determine, but for the sake of keeping the maths simple, we won’t go far wrong if we work on the basis that half of the four million are women, and that – despite all the feminism, lesbians, female-to-male transitions, infertile anorexics and so on - they will have an average of one child each.
Assuming that each of those children has a different father, that makes one child per two liberal adults, giving them a total of two million children to form their second breeding generation (‘cohort’ is the word used by demographers). That’s one million couples for next time around.
On our side of the fence, we start with the low median of the Nation estimate for Quiverfull families – 10,000. Taking their average of seven children per family, that gives them 70,000 individuals in their second generation.
In the second generation, the one million liberal couples produce half a million children, .i.e. 250,000 breeding couples, who produce 250,000 children for the third generation.
We will err on the side of pessimism and assume that 20,000 of the Quiverfull children are lost into the mainstream, leaving 50,000 adults to form 25,000 families who, at seven children each, produce 175,000 children.
While the numbers have already shifted very radically, it is always the third generation of rapid demographic trends which makes the real difference. If the descendants of the original four million liberals continue the same habit as their parents and grandparents (and, given the tendency of only children to go on to have small families themselves, that is very likely), the 250,000 form 125,000 breeding pairs, who will have between them a mere 125,000 children.
In the same third generation, by contrast, the Quiverfull numbers explode. Let us again, build some pessimism into the figures. We will assume that 25,000 of this generation drop out (some may even end up as slow-breeding liberals). That leaves 150,000 individuals to form 75,000 loving families. Families which once again do nothing more unusual than rejecting contraception and having seven children – a figure which is still actually fewer than the natural human average. They will produce 525,000 children, compared to the liberals’ 125,000.
That is how 10,000 Christian families will outbreed four million liberals, and it takes just three breeding generations – a mere 75 years – to do it.
Throughout this process, and even to this point, the population of adult liberals will be huge, relative to the Christian side, but all bar that new generation of 125,000 will be past child-bearing age. In demographic terms, the doddery old liberal fools are completely irrelevant. It’s all over bar the dying off. As the saying goes, ‘demographics is destiny’.
Remember that this process is already underway. The higher fertility rate of US ‘Red states’ over ‘Blue states’ is a factor of recognised political significance. The same may be seen in most of the world – conservative, religious people tend to have bigger families than their secular counterparts. Regardless of ethnic group and the actual religion in question, religious belief is the best predictor of larger than usual families, while atheism is a very good predictor of hedonistic selfishness and childlessness or small families.
Radical Muslims and Orthodox Jews are also out-breeding their own ‘moderates’. The future is more conservative, more separated. While this is likely to deepen and revive fault lines between religions, it also means that liberalism will be under assault from all sides. Since it is liberalism which has so undermined our peoples’ will and ability to resist our dispossession, that is the most important thing at present.
As we make clear in different contexts throughout this trilogy, it is not enough merely to have children. It is also necessary to rear them right. Indeed, it is self-evident that this is the key to maintaining the high group birth rate for three or four generations which is the only realistic road back for the White, Christian nations of the world.
The fundamental building blocks of such a movement are threefold. First - given what we know about religious faith being at the basis of a healthy desire for large numbers of children - Christian faith. Second, the institution of the family. Third, a broader community of like-minded families, for this is essential to provide good examples, mutual support and the various institutions needed to make this way of life normal, sustainable and attractive.
It takes a family (preferably an extended family) to raise a child, but it takes a network of villages to make him a man – and a family man at that. Right at the start of our collective push to encourage the next generation to have more children, therefore, we need to be ploughing effort, mental energy, money and love into building these ‘in real life’ support networks.
Mother and toddler groups. Self-sufficiency clubs. Community technology co-operatives. Scout groups. Home-schoolers’ weekend clubs and sports associations. Social structures. Bands. Choirs. Concerts. Survival weekends. Schools for manly skills and womanly knowledge. Music festivals. Churches. Training centres. Pubs. Cafes and restaurants. Mutual trading registers. Credit unions. The list is almost endless, and every little failure and every big success alike will widen and deepen the wisdom, experience and collective skill set of the movement.
As we leave our excursion into demographics behind, remember that this was not an exercise in abstract mathematics. It was rather a demonstration of physical fact; of a natural law every bit as real and immutable as the Law of Gravity. If Group A has more children than Group B, and at least as much social and economic cohesion as Group B, then Group A will eventually outnumber Group B.
The only way liberal Group B can prevent that happening would be to steal and brainwash the children of Group A, or to kill so many of us as to go beyond creating martyrs and arousing even more fervent resistance. Either of which ‘solutions’ is, of course, the very definition of genocide.
The very real problem of liberal brainwashing via the education system, entertainment and the mass media – and the defensive measures available to us all - is something which we have dealt with elsewhere in this series.
If thousands of Bible-staunch Christians, patriots and nationalists put aside childish things such as elections and Fed-inspired nonsense about ‘waging armed struggle against the System’, the only thing left to the liberals would one day be genocidal war.
[The next couple of paragraphs were of course written well before Donald Trump’s wholly unexpected second term victory. They do, however, still speak to the situation in much of the rest of the world and, potentially, to the USA in the future tooi - NG Oct 2025]
Now, there is no doubt that the Biden/Harris years are going to see persecution, injustice and repression in the USA but, in all probability, it will be no worse than what the nationalists of Western Europe have been forced to endure for at least a decade already.
That would mean dozens, or even hundreds, of individuals being sent to prison for the crime of telling the truth or for questioning elite dogma on certain ‘sensitive’ subjects. It would mean that in place of meetings being held openly in hotels advertised months in advance, activists have to get used to dodging gangs of Antifa hoodlums as they head to a semi-secret rendezvous point, from which they are re-directed to the completely secret venue, for which the organisers have already arranged a back-up in case leftist threats or police pressure force the owners to bar their doors at the last minute.
It would mean decent men and women who are – or have ever been – members of certain entirely legal organisations, being banned from working in an ever-growing list of jobs. In the old Soviet Union, dissident physics professors were stripped of their tenues and forced to work as grave diggers and street sweepers. In modern Britain, grave diggers and street sweepers are sacked for being nationalists.
The coming repression will mean all these things and more. It might even go as far as the persecution of Christians and dissidents in Soviet satellites such as Czechoslovakia in the final years of the Soviet Union. It will be most unpleasant, but it is not going to be genocidal war. It isn’t even likely to involve mass arrests and the opening of the FEMA gulag. The end of 230 years of American freedom is a civilisational crime and tragedy, but it isn’t the end of the world – not even for American patriots.
The Democrat coup d’état in the United States is going to force up the potential personal cost of resisting liberal totalitarianism, but as the USA lurches to German and British levels of anti-nationalist hysteria and repression, the most risky forms of dissent will be publically questioning particularly sacred cows.
It will become increasingly dangerous to do various things: To argue for political incorrect interpretations of controversial moments in history; fly the ‘wrong’ flag; post ‘hate speech’ online; complain about the high birth rate of Muslims or the power of the Zionist lobby in the mass media; launch a remotely credible (even at a local level) electoral challenge to the elite; demonstrate outside abortion mills; point out to a man who has his genitals surgically and chemically reshaped that he is not a woman but a man without male genitals; question the artificial ‘consensus’ on climate change or Covid, or get drunk with a federal informer.
But not one of those things would in any way increase your chances of finding the right spouse and settling down to have a natural sized, healthy family. True, some of the above are things which you need to teach your children, but to do so you do not have to print them on a billboard and erect it outside your house.
All you need to do is to get married, have children, and exercise the self-discipline and common sense that will give you the best chance of staying out of prison for long enough to teach them these things – and to warn and protect them against those who would teach them lies and feed them poison.
Now let us pause for a moment, for this is a good time for reflection. If you are still young enough to take this advice, you must now either decide to take it, and set about making it happen, or admit that you actually don’t care enough to do it.
If the latter is the case, you may be able to find something to do to aid the Cause, but please don’t kid yourself that it’s anything like as good as having children and rearing them right. And most definitely do not try to evade the hard truth about your own abdication of responsibility by trying to persuade others that they should join you on the path to irrelevance and oblivion.
If your child-making days have already past you by - or if you failed to do enough to keep your children from growing up as lost liberals - then your first impulse may be to say that you wish you’d read all this 40 years ago, but it’s too late now. The good news here is that it is not.
To have defied the command of God and nature to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ is a sin but, like all sins, as long as you truly repent of it, and find a way to make amends, it will be forgiven and forgotten. There is no need to explain your past mistakes, and no point beating yourself up about them.
The thing to do is to take effective action to do something worthwhile to help make up for your past error, to use your experience and worldly assets to help to put and to keep a vital few more of the next generation on the right path. Ironically, the older you are the easier and more satisfying this is likely to be. Because there are no pockets in a shroud; you can’t take it with you.
Returning directly to the demographics, I must add that, while seven children per family is the Quiverfull average and the basis of our study here, it is not a number that is set in stone. To have more would be even better, but to have even as few as three puts you in the bracket of being a problem-solver rather than just another demographic problem-maker.
If for some reason you can’t even do that, there are still things you can do to help others along the same road – the only road back which is open to our people. Remember also that, while having a big family is not always an easy road, it is not only more constructive than any other alternative, but also invariably a safer and more satisfying one.
Together with the arrival of increasingly sophisticated technologies of surveillance and control, the Democrat coup in the USA and the global elite’s Covid coup worldwide are going to make doing the right thing more difficult and dangerous for all of us. But it will be the political types, those who insist on shouting slogans online or at set-piece demonstrations, who will suffer first, and suffer the most.
Those with the common sense to avoid confrontations, and who – without hiding their views from family, friends and neighbours – keep their calm heads below the parapet, will be the ones who make the biggest contribution. In the ways that really count – having children and teaching them our values, our ways, our truths and our faith.
Even the vital work of connecting such families through the habits, organisations and institutions of resistance counter-power can often be kept below the radar. Even if those four million liberals were to read about the quiet, patient work of our ten thousand Christian families, they will generally do nothing except give a contemptuous, racist sneer about ‘in-bred rednecks’ and go back to discussing the latest discovery of a further ten ‘genders’.
 |
Home schooling is a natural fit for large families. There’s no point having children and then handing their young minds over to a perverse and perverting liberal 'indoctrination system
If the least irrational of them take any steps at all to deal with the ‘problem’ of Christians and patriots setting out to separate and breed, it is likely to be a ban on home-schooling. Such a move should of course be fiercely resisted, but even if it happens, it does nothing to invalidate our plan. It simply makes it a little harder, for in this case the lessons would simply go underground and take place outside normal school hours.
In general, however – as we conclude in the chapter Learning from History - there is very little the liberals can do to stop peaceful, moral and constructive counter-power initiatives by the conscious Resistance without smashing down the doors and trampling on the rights of millions of other normal citizens too. If they do that, it becomes a whole new ballgame. If they don’t, if our fast-breeding, high-cohesion resistance alternative structures are left to do God’s work in peace, the vast majority of liberals won’t even notice what’s happening demographically until it’s too late.
Assuming that the Great Reset system manages to survive its own contradictions and inherently self-destructive dogmas that long, a showdown is inevitable at that point. Various imported ethnic and religious minorities will continue to outbreed White people in general, but that makes no difference at all to the fact that White traditionalist Christians will at the same time outbreed the White liberals.
At some point, perhaps decades in the future, the ageing liberals will be tempted to go to war on the growing block of youthful traditionalists created by the peaceful resistance of the full cradle. If they do, they will of course look to their ‘minority’ clients to do the fighting and dying, but there is no way they could insulate themselves from the mayhem they unleash and try to direct.
Such a civil war would not have a front line. Or rather, it would have ten thousand front lines, which would mean that there would be no ‘safe territory’ comfortably away from the trouble. Not everyone would become a victim, but no-one would be safe. Even the richest would have to come out of their gated communities sooner or later and, in any case, the role of cyber sabotage and drone strikes in asymmetrical warfare would mean that the super-rich in the most expensive gated compound would probably be even more vulnerable than the inhabitants of the most poverty-stricken trailer park.
The biggest (worldly) problem of all for liberals going up against consciously fertile Christians is this: the two groups would experience a very different cost of war. For all the desperate grief that every parent feels for the loss of a child, Christians with seven or eight children would be able spare a son. The survivors will honour his sacrifice and carry his memory forward by naming one of the next generation after him.
But when liberals lose their only son, their line comes to a shuddering halt; their lives are left empty, utterly hollow with grief and despair. Christians love peace, but they can afford to fight, and to send their sons, to fight in a Just War. Liberals cannot, and often will not. Wars – especially civil wars – are often decided not by who can hand out the most punishment, but by who can endure the most pain.
The moment we move to considering the non-material plane, the balance shifts even further against the liberals. Because all the Christian sons have siblings, and very possibly children of their own, to fight for, while the liberals very often have only themselves. We all fear death – or at least the pain of death – but we have more to live for, and therefore more, if necessary, for which to die.
Above all, Christians forced by injustice and persecution to fight the Just War will look forward to Eternal Life, and be willing to risk death. The atheist liberals, by contrast, will look on the prospect of death and oblivion with cowardly horror. Such a conflict is not to be wished for, because even a Just War involves terrible pain, crimes on both sides and the destruction of much that is good and beautiful. But if it does come, the end result of a war between two such very differently committed sets of combatants cannot be in question.
It remains only to make the point that the differential impact of death or other losses on each group varies greatly at different stages. In the first generation, when our numbers are so much lower than theirs, the loss of even one potential parent from the ranks of the Christian patriots is a blow many more times serious than the loss of four or five in the second generation, or a hundred in the third.
It doesn’t matter how that loss is incurred. It may be through death or imprisonment as a result of getting lured into an unequal battle with the massively powerful liberal state or its hired guns on the far-left. It may be through being sucked into the System in pursuit of riches, fame or an easy life. It may be through disillusionment with apparently slow progress, or anger over one of the petty disagreements and quarrels that always happen in any human group, particularly those under external pressure. It doesn’t matter how it might happen, we have to strive to ensure that it does not, or at least happens to as few as possible.
Yes, as Christians we understand the importance of heroic witness and the power of martyrdom to inspire others. And, yes, there are some evils that simply have to be resisted. But we face a long war and, right now, we are at our weakest. We have plenty of old men, but there is a dire lack of young men with right hearts and the stomach for a fight.
Even where men and women of European descent and Christian faith are still in the overall majority, the Great Reset lockdowns and the blatant theft of the 2020 US Presidential election have confirmed that our people do not at present have what it takes to stand up and defend their rights.
The whole of the Western world has fallen under the thrall of puppet regimes which quite blatantly impose the will of the global elite. Whether we call ourselves Americans, British, English, Irish, French, Spanish, Swedish or whatever, the stark truth is that we are all living in occupied zones. We are as stateless as the Kurds but, unlike the Kurds, our peoples don’t even understand that, let alone have the collective will to try to change it.
We have spoken of war, and war will surely come one day. But Christians and patriots must do everything in our power to avoid it. In this coming generation more than any other in history. Because, right now, we need babies far more than we need martyrs. If that means we must sometimes bite our tongues, then bite them. If it means we must sometimes be struck, and instead of lashing out, turn the other cheek – well, that recommendation comes from the very Highest authority.
The time will come to equip a revolutionary army, but first we must make it. This struggle will take three generations. The first to make children and to rear them as good men and women who have a grasp of their identity and common destiny. The second to create leaders and a fervour for freedom and justice. The third to wage and win the war. Before we can win the War of the Revolution, we must first win the War of the Cradle.
It is not yet our time, but we can be confident that ‘our day will come’. We are going to be subjected to oppression and injustice, but if we steel ourselves to endure the pain and to remain true and on course despite it, we may be sure not only that ‘our revenge will be the laughter of our children’, but also that justice and right will be restored by theirs.
Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale! If you have enjoyed this post, please share it with others and help to spread the word.
I wrote this essay back in 2020. It was first published in the book Deus Vult - The Great Reset Resistance. Available here: https://www.
Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
|
