Latest Articles From The Conservative Woman

Latest Articles From The Conservative Woman 

The compliments commissars who ruin every good party Gustavo Jalife WE live in an age where kindness is usually mistaken for bigotry and where moral vigilance often slips into a kind of irrational fear of wrongdoing or worse: sheer paranoia. An entire generation has been trained to scan words for hidden bias, to assume offence even when none exists. When only interpretation matters, the result […]  Is it really so awful to like Taylor Swift? Brian Meredith ONE of the intriguing developments in contemporary debate is the way that people expressing disdain and disgust seem so much more confident and fearless of contradiction than those daring to concede an interest. This was never more evident in these particular columns in recent months than with the fierce debate about singer Taylor Swift, with […] From Andrew to Mr Blobby, our runners and riders for the Beeb job John Ellwood Following Tim Davie’s resignation as Director General of the BBC, the Corporation’s Human Resources Department have been working round the clock with a crack team of recruitment consultants to compile a shortlist of possible replacements. TCW understands that the following are being considered for the post. Andrew (the royal formerly known as Prince) The late […] Why the annual festive flu panic is a load of old Humbug Roger Watson IF YOU are one of the handful of people left in the UK after the devastating and deadly covid events of 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 . . . and counting, then you have probably only survived long enough to be killed by the next flu epidemic. And, by all accounts, a big […] Our top ten articles of the week TCW THESE are the most-read articles we have published in the past week. The BBC is a stinking Augean Stables of bias and fabrication whose licence fee is no longer tenable – David Keighley An open letter to Laura Kuenssberg about BBC bias and green energy – Roger J Arthur The BBC anti-Semites who peddle the […] Letter of the day Our Readers Dear Editor ALMOST 50 years ago I received my first pay packet together with a slip of paper telling me how much tax and national insurance I’d paid. I felt proud that I was at last making a contribution towards those who protected us from:    ⁃    disease and ill health;   ⁃    rapists, […]

Why “Capitalism” Isn’t Working

Why “Capitalism” Isn’t Working

 

Before you can build an economy, you must first have a nation. Not just lines on a map or a government bureaucracy, but a people unified by faith, blood, tradition, and a shared destiny. A real economy requires a protected home market, a common legal framework, and above all, a population bound together by mutual interest.

What we have today is none of that, instead we have an abomination: an economic system without a home, a soul, or a flag. It is an economy of rootless financial parasites, where the only sacred truth is the steady climb of the almighty green line. This system feels no loyalty to Ohio’s factory towns or Michigan’s working families. It has no conscience. It serves nothing but the numbers on a screen no matter how many lives, communities, or generations are devoured in the process.

For decades our political leaders taught us that the great battle of our time was Capitalism versus Socialism and that to be a patriot was to chant free market slogans like “socialism sucks” while our factories were packed up and shipped to China. They convinced us that economic freedom meant cheering as our industries were offshored and our towns were hollowed out for the sake of a higher corporate profit margin.

Zohran Mamdani’s victory in New York City should therefore not come as a surprise. It is the direct and festering symptom of the very disease I am describing. It is the political manifestation of an economic system that has abandoned its native population. When you systematically impoverish and displace a people you do not get gratitude. You get Mamdani.

His victory is a scream of pain from a generation that has been left with nothing to lose. They are not voting for socialism because they have read Marx; they are voting for “free” buses and “free” childcare because the alternative is a life of impossible financial pressure.

Of course there’s a much bigger elephant in the room that no one seems to want to address: nearly half of the people in New York City are foreign-born. In a state that was once an engine of American industry and a beacon of our shared national culture, most of the population now has its primary cultural and familial ties, its deepest loyalties and first loves, elsewhere.

This massive demographic shift is the root cause of the political and economic sickness we see across the nation. It is the reason a leftist radical with a name like “Zohran Mamdani” can rise to power in a great American city. He offers socialist palliatives to a native population squeezed out of its own future and the promise of free stuff to the new permanent underclass of foreigners. The reason housing costs are stratospheric in the first place is because demand is artificially inflated by endless streams of these new arrivals. It is also the reason wages remain stagnant, as a permanent, imported underclass is used to undercut the bargaining power of American workers.

What is the answer from our leadership to this man-made crisis?

A fifty-year mortgage and another $2,000 stimulus check.

We did not vote for this. We mobilized, we fought, and we sent a message that was supposed to be unmistakable. We demanded a restoration of sovereignty. We demanded the reclamation of our economy. The rallying cry was not for creative financing and a lifetime of usury. It was for the removal of the foreign labor army that undermines our wages and our communities. It was a demand for fifty million deportations to restore the bargaining power of the American worker and make housing affordable again through the sane, natural laws of supply and demand.

We did not ask for a longer leash. We asked for our freedom. We do not want fifty years of mortgage payments. We want fifty million deportations. We want an economy that works for our people. We want a nation that puts its own children first. Anything less is not a compromise. It is a surrender. And we will not surrender.

It is one of the great ironies of modern history that the very regime we are taught to revile above all others achieved what our own leaders insist is impossible. While we are relentlessly instructed on the horrors of National Socialism, we are never told of its economic miracle. A revival so stunning it lifted a nation from the ashes of despair and turned it into an industrial leader within a handful of years.

While our system plunges young men into lifelong debt for the chance at a home, the National Socialists offered marriage loans, slashed unemployment to zero, and prioritized the stability of the family as the core of national strength. They understood a fundamental truth our leaders deny: that an economy must serve its own people first. They did not outsource their future or replace their workforce. They valued their workers, celebrated mothers, and forged an economic engine that hummed with purpose and productivity.

We are told their system was pure evil, yet ours, which impoverishes our youth, dissolves our borders, and laughs at the very concept of national interest, is presented as moral and just. The question screams to be asked: who are the real monsters? Those who built a nation for their people, or those who are selling ours off piece by piece?

This globalist economic system has been the most effective weapon ever deployed against the American people. It destroyed our industrial heartland through a coordinated betrayal by our own leaders. It corrupted our culture by replacing a sense of shared heritage and common good with a hollow, consumerist individualism that leaves us isolated and powerless. It attacked our people, making us strangers in our own land and competing against the entire world for jobs, housing, and a sliver of the dream.

We’ve been importing the third-world for decades and suddenly everyone is shocked that we’re getting third-world politics. A nation cannot survive when it becomes a mere territory, a hotel for the world. A nation is a people. It is a shared blood, a shared story, a shared destiny.

A healthy economy is not an accident. It is built with intention and defended with conviction. For decades, we were fed the lie that capitalism and the invisible hand of the free market would be the tide that lifts all boats. We were told to trust the market to self-correct, to believe the invisible hand would forge a nation our children could inherit. It’s time to wake up and smell the roses: the boats are sinking and the invisible hand has robbed us blind.

The spiritual cost is even greater than the economic one. A young man without meaningful work is a man without a purpose. He is denied the fundamental dignity of being a provider, of building something tangible with his hands and his mind. This idleness, this forced dependency, is a poison that erodes the soul. It leads to despair, to addiction, to the breakdown of the family itself.

The globalist system has created a generation of men who are told they are unnecessary, that their strength and their capacity for hard work are relics of a bygone era. This is a lie told to break their spirit and make them compliant. To the young men who are reading this I need you to listen to me very carefully: you are necessary, you matter, and we are going to win.

We will restore the covenant between the economy and the people. An economy is healthy when it strengthens the nation, when it provides for the common defense and promotes the general welfare, as our founding documents intended. It is sick when it enriches a handful of rootless cosmopolitans while impoverishing the heartland. We must judge every economic policy by a simple standard: does this make our people stronger? Does this provide a future for our children? Does this preserve our national character?

Capitalism unmoored from national interest is a suicide pact. It sacrifices the long-term health of the nation for the short-term profits of a cosmopolitan elite. The “green line going up” on a screen in Manhattan is a pathetic substitute for the prosperity of a thousand Main Streets across the country.

The old conservative mantra is bankrupt. We don’t need to be yelled at about how bad socialism is. We need a movement that recognizes the globalist system we live under is the disease, and that a patriotic, pro-worker, nationalist economics is the only cure. The goal isn’t to make the line go up. The goal is to make our people strong, our nation secure, and our future our own again.

The answer is not to abandon enterprise or ownership, but rather to chain them firmly to the nation they are meant to serve. This requires economic patriotism enacted into law through trade policies that make it more profitable to build and hire at home than to exploit cheap labor abroad. It demands a full moratorium on all worker visa programs until every young American who wants a job can find one that pays a family sustaining wage. It calls for a national mission of reindustrialization, a united effort to bring our critical industries, from microchips to medicines, back to our shores. Most importantly, it requires an explicit rejection of the globalist creed. Corporations and their leaders must owe their primary allegiance to the nation that provides their customers, their security, and their very identity.

This is not an argument against prosperity. It is an argument for a prosperity that endures. It is a vision of an economy where profits serve the people, not the other way around. It is a system where a young man can earn enough on a single income to support a wife and children with dignity. It is a future where a young woman can see hope and opportunity in the same town where she was raised.

That is the only economy worth fighting for. Anything less is merely organized national suicide, and our youth are the ones being sacrificed on its altar. The stakes are nothing less than the soul and survival of America itself. We will not go quietly into their managed decline.

We will fight, we will build, and we will win.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King

Support Gab News

If you enjoy our writing, please consider supporting our work.

Support Gab News

Gab News is entirely reader supported — no corporate ads, no strings attached. Your donations make it possible for us to speak truth boldly, defend free speech, and build the parallel systems needed to preserve Christian values and freedom online.

Email Address

Cardholder Name

Zip Code

The Truth Behind False Flags Explained

David Icke discusses what is a false flag and how they operate, often driven by a hidden agenda. He explores different layers of conspiracy, including recognizing manipulation and understanding the dark motives behind these events. Pre-order David's New Book - The Roadmap: https://shop.ickonic.com/product/the-... Tickets for Live Events: https://openvisioneventslimited.tellt... Sign up to the Ickonic Media Platform: https://www.ickonic.com Latest News From David Icke: www.davidicke.com Social Media   / davidicke     / davidicke   https://www.minds.com/davidickeofficial https://onstellar.com/davidickeofficial

 

The Battle to Influence Populism We Are Not Alone, And We Don't have Much Time  Follow Nick On Substack Follow Nick on X By Nick Griffin November 2025 It is time for a word of clarification. In talking about nationalist ideas, I am not using the phrase as code for Nazism. I have pointed out often enough in the past that an obsession with Hitler and Germany nearly a hundred years ago has been encouraged by almost every agent provocateur or turncoat in the history of the nationalist movement. If you need an example, take a look at the career of the late and unlamented Ray Hill (far right on photo above, leading a BM march in 1981), who - paid and guided by the Zionist-Marxist Gerry Gable - spent years pushing stiff right arm salutes and political necrophilia as he destabilised first the National Front, then the British Movement and then the British National Party (before my time, I hasten to add). There’s a reason for this. In fact, there are several. The first is that the far-left and the political Judaists know that Nazi slogans, images and references serve to isolate those who use them from the wider population. This is a kiss of death not only in electoral politics, but also for efforts to work with normal people in all other ventures too. The next is that the ‘threat’ of the Hollywood nonsense they spread is their stock-in-trade. Bodies like Searchlight, Hope Not Hate, the ADL, Southern Poverty Law Center and the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism are, in essence, protection rackets. They use the threat of fascists and racists in order to gouge donations out of their supporters and benefactors, and there’s no more powerful threat than the ultimate demon, a 21st-century Hitler. (The presence of two Stateside bodies in that list, by the way, is a reminder that much of what I am writing about Britain and Farage applies also to the USA and Trump). This goes beyond the specific problem of highly demonised National Socialism. While nationalism is a universal belief system with certain common core principles, the way in which those principles are developed and expressed must reflect the unique spirit and identity of each individual nation. This is what Mussolini understood when he told Mosley that “fascism is not for export” and warned the hugely talented but impatient English aristocrat not to adopt the black shirt or the Roman salute. Finally, it is an unavoidable fact that all of the ‘old’ nationalisms were developed in very different times to those which coming generations face. They were produced by - and for - a time of growing populations; in which technologies we take for granted were at most unlikely science fiction; when class warfare was an internal thing between different sections of individual nations, rather than a struggle for basic human values between We The People and a global elite operating on behalf of Mammon and Lucifer. Knives and Gunfights The old forms of nationalism were also developed at a time when the great enemy was a materialist ideology - Communism. As such, it was logical and effective that the antidotes should also be an ideology, fascism, which was primarily materialistic in turn. In the 21st century, by contrast, the enemies of our people are the Islamism of the occupiers, the atheism of the cultural Marxists, and the transhuman Luciferianism of the globalists. All three are religions, to try to oppose them with an ideology is to take a knife to a gunfight. When you were up against an ideology, you had to fight it with an alternative ideology. When the enemy is armed with religious faith, your ideas still have to provide the answers to the material problems of the masses, but they must also be based in religious faith. In the nations which once constituted Christendom, that can only be Christianity, hence the nationalism of the 21st century must be rooted in Christianity. Not the abominable heresy misnamed ‘Christian-Zionism’, but our traditional faith, which created not just our great cathedrals but also the ideas of individual responsibility, inquiry and the rule of law, which underpinned everything worthwhile which emerged out the age which is now passing. Share That’s only the briefest glimpse of why ideas which came out of the 1930s are hopelessly out-of-dated and unsuitable as guides for the times to come. Those who insist on staying a hundred years in the past will remain isolated, irrelevant and without influence as a result. Any attempt by neo-Nazi sects to promote their ideas in UK populist circles will be short-lived and end in total failure. Bigger Dangers There are, however, several newer and more ‘saleable’ ideas whose adherents could make a serious effort to influence populism. Britain, the USA, France and Germany have already seen supposed nationalists who have sold the pass on homosexuality, thereby betraying the commitment to family values and natalism - central tenets of genuine nationalism. In the Anglosphere at least, this phenomenon goes hand-in-hand with a growing fascination with the Neo-Reactionary and Neo-Feudalist ‘ideals’ of Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug) and Nick Land. Meet the new false guru, same as the old false guru. Curtis Yarvin. When people who call themselves ‘nationalists’ will even give such a creature the time of day, you know that they are fake, whatever else they say. You have been warned! Their overblown, pseudo-intellectual drivel centres on replacing democracy with ‘gov-corps’ techno-fascism. This should automatically repel populist movements, whose supposed raison d’etre is electoral revolt by the people against the tyranny of the elites, but this cannot be guaranteed. This strain of diseased ideology has gained the sympathetic interest of extraordinarily wealthy men such as Palentir boss Peter Thiel, while Elon Musk and Vice President Vance also flirt with their ideas. While there is still little chance that this anti-human poison will appeal to older populists, there is a real danger that the next generation will be susceptible. As AI obliterates swathes of white-collar professions, a career in local or national government with rapidly expanding populist parties will become attractive to more and more university-educated young men. Their generation is so outnumbered by older voters that democracy effectively means gerontocracy - rule by the elderly. This makes them potentially vulnerable to ideas which provide intellectual justification for a turning away from people power and towards technocracy and capitalist corporatism. Sadly, we haven’t heard the last of Yarvin and Land. Leave a comment The applied selfishness of Ayn Rand is another aspect of capitalist-conservative thought which could have some resonance among populists. Atlas Shrugged is now rather dated in the technology and society in which it is set, but the self-serving socialist ‘mouchers’ she portrays could all be ministers in the Starmer regime or bureaucrats overseeing the looting and collapse of New York. Rand’s ideas won’t be attractive to the grass-roots, since the rocket fuel of populist support is the growing unease of European populations who see demographic change undermining all their old certainties. This also makes them tend towards tribalism, which makes Rand’s Objectivist hyper-individualism drastically out of kilter with the spirit of the times. Among the populists’ bright young things, however, it could be a different matter. Rand’s musings, pernicious though they are, do at least have the advantage of being written in readable English, unlike the tortured, pretentious jargon of the Neo-Reactionaries. Her ideas are still backed by well-funded, CIA-front foundations, established to promote capitalist ideals during the Cold War. As such they can readily be activated for a campaign to ensure that the rising force in Old World politics keeps within Atlanticist bounds and doesn’t even think of challenging the hegemony of Washington and Wall Street. Civic nationalism is another problem, not least because its tendency to take the path not of principle but of least resistance aligns very closely with populism. Farage, Meloni, Marine and pretty much all the others are themselves all civnats, so attempts to create a coherent civnat ideology for populist parties would be perfectly logical. Whether ‘logical’ translates into ‘feasible’ is, fortunately for us, far from certain. The central ‘idea’ of civic nationalism - that every featherless biped on the planet is at heart a law-abiding, ideal citizen, needing only to breath our healing air and salute our magic flag to fit in perfectly with our high-trust society - is so ridiculous that it betrays a complete lack of the logic, rationality and backbone needed to create a coherent set of ideas. The populists’ and civnats’ parallel addiction to free trade and anti-national institutions such as NATO also make it very difficult for them to develop a coherent set of principles. That, however, need not stop them trying. Hence it is unlikely that the ideological vacuum in populist movements like Reform will last forever. Window of Opportunity Any one of the interest groups mentioned here wouldn’t even notice the £25,000 start-up cost of the proposal I outlined earlier in this series. [This, in short, is to cover the cost of printing a slender but controversial (and thus unusually attractive) and powerful book, backed up by online educational efforts. And delivering this material to every Reform councillor and prospective parliamentary candidate.] We need to beat them to the punch. The current window of opportunity is unlikely to stay open for very long. We need to articulate - and inject into populism - a comprehensive, principled, coherent and ideologically sound set of ethnonationalist principles and ideals, healthily and deeply rooted in our own native soil and traditions. So you might like to get yourself a big glass jar and start filling it with spare loose change and the occasional fiver, because at some point I’m going to have to ask you to chip in towards that twenty five grand. As to the precise ideals which will be the basis of this operation, I will be setting them out here on Substack, so that they can be discussed and, where necessary, clarified and refined. While it is not possible for any sort of committee to draft effective ideas, it is very beneficial to have feedback and input from an extended group of constructive critics. What I will say in closing this section is that the populist parties of the entire white world are open to the same sort of operation. The 21st-century ideas to be developed here could easily become a starting point for similar operations in other countries. Subject, of course, to them picking up on the nationalist generalities, rather than the English/British specifics. Our focus, however, must be on Britain and the British peoples, and especially on England, since Reform is but a right-wing version of the left-wing fake nationalisms which provide safety-valve alternatives in Wales and Scotland. We have to do it, because there is no-one to do it other than us. There are no white knights in shining armour. No political wizards with magic wands. There is only us. Us alone. And that will be enough.

“Destroyed Some Countries”: Trump Tears Into EU Over Migration Chaos | APT

Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on the European Union’s migration policies during his joint remarks with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, warning that “they’ve destroyed some countries.” Praising Orbán’s zero-migrant stance, Trump said Europe was being “flooded with people from all over the world” and accused Brussels of punishing Hungary for defending its borders. Orbán, who faces daily EU fines for rejecting illegal migration, called the penalties “absurd” and vowed to keep Hungary’s borders secure despite EU pressure.

Nick Griffin | Jews, Zionism, the Far-Right & Islam in Europe

Dilly Hussain spoke with the right wing figure, who was the former leader of the British Nationalist Party (BNP) and a member of the European Parliament for North West England, Nick Griffin. Topics of discussion include:

• Ten historical and current figures popular with the British far-right.
• Jews, Europe, and Zionism.
• British Muslims, migration, and Islamophobia.
• "Pakistani sexual grooming gangs" scandal.
• Western-led wars and the Muslim refugee crisis.
• Israel, the Zionist lobby, and the war on Gaza.
• A future truce between the Christian West and a future caliphate.