Search This Blog

Wednesday, 19 November 2025

Latest TWC articles from Britain

 

Ten reasons to be sceptical about Mahmood’s migrant measures

Bruce Newsome
Ten reasons to be sceptical about Mahmood’s migrant measures

LAST week Home Office officials started telling their friends in the press that we were about to see ‘the most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times’. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood released her policy paper on Monday. The plans are rife with vagaries and contradictions, despite explicitly studying Denmark’s radical reforms (since 2016) […]

This BBC scandal runs much deeper than the Trump deception

Daniel Jupp
This BBC scandal runs much deeper than the Trump deception

THE 16-page internal document that detailed blatant bias and misreporting at the BBC covered Panorama’s doctoring of Donald Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, the anti-Israeli bias of the BBC Arabic service and BBC reporting on Gaza, and selective coverage of trans issues and trans activism. But it’s the Trump footage that has attracted the […]

Covid and the ‘nocebo effect’, Part 1: If they say you’re ill, you feel ill

Dr Gary Sidley and Dr Jonathan Engler
Covid and the ‘nocebo effect’, Part 1: If they say you’re ill, you feel ill

WHAT was the major cause of the harms reported during the covid event? Disparity of opinion persists about the relative contributions of various factors to documented morbidity for 2020 to 2022. Proponents of the government narrative continue to assert that a novel virus was predominantly responsible. Meanwhile, many critics of the ‘pandemic’ story highlight the pervasive consequences […]

Crowborough on the march – thousands protest over asylum camp

Madeleine Gillies
Crowborough on the march – thousands protest over asylum camp

‘WE WUN’T be druv’, or ‘we won’t told what to do’, is the unofficial motto of the county of Sussex and encapsulates perfectly the mounting defiance of the East Sussex town of Crowborough. The town is engaged in a battle to prevent 600 male asylum seekers (the equivalent of two battalions) being placed in an […]

Smear Trump at all costs – our dossier on the brazen BBC, Part 4

David Keighley
Smear Trump at all costs – our dossier on the brazen BBC, Part 4

HARD evidence of the BBC’s doctoring of President Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, came as no surprise to David Keighley, who’s been on ‘BBC Watch’ for TCW since we launched in 2014. Following his devastating critique of Nick Robinson’s Today programme defiance last Friday, he’s dipped into the TCW archive for other ‘BBC monitoring’ articles he’s written which mentioned Trump. He found a catalogue of bias and prejudice that may interest the President’s […]

Letter of the day

Our Readers
Letter of the day

Dear Editor Why is there so much opposition to digital ID and other digital advances? This association with state oppression is complete nonsense. We are not going to go back to serfdom by having an ID card. We already have national insurance numbers, driving licences, passports, and a whole host of contracts for domestic supplies […]

The UK's Mother of All Constitutional Crises

 

The UK's Mother of All Constitutional Crises

The Coming Clash Between Farage and the House of Lords

By Nick Griffin November 2025
Nigel Farage faces war with the House of Lords

With Reform still riding high in the polls, the UK could well be sleep-walking into a gigantic constitutional crisis. Strange as it may seem, Shabana Mahmood’s attempt to out-BNP Nigel Farage may even be the last chance for the House of Lords.

The Home Secretary’s proposals to clamp down on asylum may be patchy, encountering fierce resistance in the institutionally anti-white Labour party, and smack of dozens of earlier (mainly Tory) empty promises on immigration. But if some of them are put into effect they might just keep Nigel out of Number 10.

And it’s the advent of a Reform government which would very likely trigger the constitutional mayhem. A House of Commons dominated by an overall Reform majority would be on a collision course with the House of Lords, the second chamber, from which Farage’s party is almost competely absent.

Farage at War With the House of Lords

The Commons, representing the will of the People, would find every scrap of its proposed legislation blocked by the Lords, representing the liberal elite Blob. You can get jsut a hint of how this would work (or, rather, wouldn’t work, at least as far as millions of voters would see it) by looking at the trouble facing the effort to push Assisted Suicide through the Lords and into law right now.

The effort to force state-sanctioned murder into UK law is facing serious resistance in the House of Lords. An unprecedented number of changes for a Private Member’s Bill have been tabled by Peers seeking to amend Kim Leadbeater’s seriously flawed assisted suicide Bill.

Supporters of the Bill criticised the interventions as a delaying tactic. Its critics, however, insist the amendments are necessary given the unworkability of the Bill and that the Bill has not undergone “due diligence and proper pre-legislative scrutiny”. Only four days have currently been scheduled for the Committee of the Whole House to consider the more than 950 amendments put forward so far. On the first day, just seven were debated.

Imagine MPs voting through bills to deport criminal illegals, defund the BBC, restrict the right of LGBTQ activists to indoctrinate and groom children. With the Tory rump forced by public opinion to vote for populist measures, they sail through the Commons. Then imagine the massed ranks of Labour, LibDem, SNP and liberal Tory Lords mounting relentless campaigns to block and sabotage the legislation.

Political paralysis ensues. What happens next? Either the populists admit defeat, complaining to the public that the old parties’ grip on the Lords prevents them carrying out key election pledges, or they take on - and break - the Lords.

Back to 1911

The potential situation is eerily similar to the constitutional crisis of 1911, when the Tory-dominated House of Lords refused to accept the law introducing old age pensions, which was pushed through the Commons by Lloyd George’s Liberals.

Public anger grew rapidly, with the Liberals warning that failure to pass the reform would lead either to victory of the young :Labour Party, or even to revolution against the rich. Suggested remedies ranged from swamping the Lords with hundreds of newly created peers to a law decreeing that any law passed three times by the Commons would receive Royal Assent without even being debated in the upper chamber.

In the end, the Liberal threat to ennoble 249 new Lords persuaded the Tory Lords to accept the Parliament Bill, which removed the peers’ right to amend or defeat finance bills and reduced their powers from the rejecting to merely delaying other legislation.

These days, the Commons must pass the same bill in two successive parliamentary sessions, with at least one year between the second-reading in the first session and the third-reading in the second session. After this. the laws involved would pass direct for Royal Assent.

Before this extreme remedy were to kick in, however, there would already have been mamy months of delays as old party MPs and Lords used filibustering tactics and endless streams of amendments. Add in the legal challenges which will be upheld by left-wing activist judges and it would be literally years before anything remotely controversial could become law, let alone be enforced.

All this political and legal wrangling would likely take place against the backdrop of violent and largescale disorder by the far-left and certain minority groups. The financial crisis inherited from Labour would add huge fiscal pressure onto the political weight and angry public opinion pressing the new government for far more rapid action.

After decades of being ignored by the old parties, the public would not be in the mood to allow them to continue to block their clear mandate for radical change by Reform. This would bring Westminster right back to 1911, except that Reform will be hard-pressed enough to find enough trustworthy and half-competent candidates to fill winnable seats for the Commons, let alone drag up hundreds more to pack into the Lords.

Leave a comment

So either Reform would be unable to deliver even those electoral promises which Farage and Co. intend to keep, or they must begin their term with laws to castrate not only the activist judges but also the Lords. Westminster would automatically be in a state of political civil war between the two chambers of the Mother of Parliaments.

Beyond even that, there lurks the question which the instinctive royalists of the ‘right’ daren’t even contemplate: If they move to tear up the constitutional rules protecting the judiciary from the legislature, and the Upper House from the Lower, then what happens if the King refuses to give Royal Assent?

Britain’s Coming Civil War?

He has no power to withold it, of course. But he could argue that, since the Commons are acting outside and above their own legal powers (as they would be), he has no choice but to follow suit. At which point we wouldn’t so much be back in 1911, as in 1642.

Now, for me at least, this brings a brief and enjoyable vision of Charles III eating a last breakfast of foie gras-topped muesli, before being led out onto a scaffolding in Whitehall to meet a newly retrained lumberjack armed with a sharp and heavy axe. But, on the face of it, that’s going a bit too far as fantasy political crises go.

Yet the crisis we’ve just considered isn’t going to end that way, it is potentially very, very real. The Blob will never give up its power unless and until it is prised from its clammy, greedy, liberal grip. If a populist party is elected therefore, it must either accept defeat and complete impotence, or be prepared for a political civil war.

The constitutional time-bomb is ticking, with Shabana Mahmood and Rachel Reeves being the two figures who might just be able to disconnect the timer from the detonator. If they were honest and competent, that would still be possible. Enjoy!

Danger UXB. A Reform victory at the next general election will plunge the UK into the Mother of All Constitutional Crises.

Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share


Tuesday, 18 November 2025

The Nazi With the Hebrew Tattoo Deported - Or Helicoptered Out?

 

The Nazi With the Hebrew Tattoo

Deported - Or Helicoptered Out?

By Nick Griffin November 2025
Follow Nick on Substack

7 New Report on the Matthew Gruter affair

Nazis! The Useful Idiots the left and the Zionist lobby just love to hate. What better way to frighten normal people away from anti-immigration events and ideas than associating them with black-clad, Sieg-Heiling goons?

How else to distract the public from Zionist genocide in Gaza or Epstein’s Mossad blackmail ring, other than recycling the persecution of European Jewry more than eighty years ago? For the Marxists and Talmudic supremacists, Nazis are the gift that keeps on giving.

If there wasn’t a “Nazi threat” to prod the herd back into line, they’d have to invent it. And a case which has rocked the small but very high-profile National Socialist Network in Australia has observers noting that it appears that’s exactly what they’ve done Down Under.

This is relevent to Britain as well, since our own home-grown Nazis, in particular the White Vanguard Movement, cite the Australian NSN as their main inspiration. They’ve even copied its uniform, despite political uniforms being banned in Britain.

When the news broke that a leading figure in the New South Wales NSN, South African born Matthew Gruter, was to be expelled from the country, his ‘comrades’ rushed to his defence.

He has been at all their high-profile demonstrations, incuding when they turned up and tried to hijack the March for Australia, providing the liberal media with the perfect opportunity to smear everyone on the huge and very positive event with the “Nazi” tag.

Nazi With the Jewish Tattoo

But then someone spotted something on the 7News report about the upcoming extradition. That was the tattoo under his arm. It appeared on the news segment apparently lifted from social media.

Matthew Gruter showing Henbrew tattoo

Matthew Gruter, with Hebrew tattoo clearly visible in this social media photo

The keen-eyed member of the genuinely patriotic Australia Fist Party ran it through AI for translation to find the ethnic origins of the script. And what do you know? It comes back as Hebrew. A full definition is available in the attached screengrab.

Matthew Gruter Jewish Nazi

Matthew Gruter’s tattoo translated. What sort of ‘Nazi’ gets inked in Hebrew?

Gruter has been a close associate and prominent lieutenant of NSN leader Thomas Sewell for several years. Yet, in all that time, we are supposed to believe that, in addition to ignoring his distinctly “un-Aryan” features, neither Sewell nor any of the weight-training-obsessed Nazis ever noticed or questioned his Hebrew tattoo.

Should be sent to Specsavers, rather than the Eastern Front.

NSN Australia - Five Eyes Decoy Ducks

Except, of course, that the real explanation is that this is not an oversight or a lack of vigiliance. The ‘Nazi’ scene, in the USA, Ukraine, central Europe, as well as in Australia, is a tool not just of the 5 Eyes intelligence Deep State but also of the Zionists, who find them useful in their different ways.

The affair gives added credence to the warnings from Australia First and other sensible observers that the much-hyped National Socialist Network is a state honeytrap organisation, operated to the same playbook as the now proscribed National Action in the UK.

I warned about NA in the same way, and nearly two dozen youngsters who ignored or denied my warnings are still in prison, with several hundred more effectively deprived of their civil right to get involved in legitimate political, cultural or community action. Any group they join at any time in the future risks being proscribed as a “continuity organisation”, so they are toxic for life.

A repeat of the NA scam is being built up in Britain right now, and it goes well beyond the tiny ranks of White Vanguard. I will be returning to this warning here in due course. In the meantime, remember = whether you’re in Britain or Australia - if it walks like a Nazi and sieg heils like a Nazi, it’s a Zionist-operated decoy duck.

Become a subscriber to Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Reform's Recycled Tories Trap The Young Bloods Must Wage Internal War Against The Old Failures

 


Reform's Recycled Tories Trap 

The Young Bloods Must Wage Internal War Against The Old Failures

By Nick Griffin November 2025

Nigel Farage has many faults. My list starts with his boast that the thing of which he is proudest in his entire career is not getting Britain out of the EU (well, sort of), but stopping the BNP. If you ever needed proof of his safety valve role, there it is.

His refusal to speak out against debanking until it happened to him, when it first happened to me and Britain’s serious nationalists back in the year 2000, is another. His claim to be a rebel and a fighter for principle fell at the first hurdle when he failed that Pastor Niemuller test (“first they debanked Nick Griffin, and I did not speak out….”).

His fake opposition to immigration is another; he’s been at it for years, and he still is. While he worked hand-in-glove with the BBC to block the BNP, he posed as “anti-immigration”, but the only sort of immigrants he opposed were white, Christian, East Europeans He was always in favour of immigration from “our traditional sources” - particularly the Indian sub-continent.

Today he makes political hay opposing the 10% of immigrants who arrive illegally, and calling for the deportation of criminals. But, as Giorgia Meloni has shown in Italy, such populist rhetoric is only window-dressing for the tsunami of Hindus and Africans these capitalist stooges want to let in as cheap labour and fresh meat for the consumerist nation-grinder.

What’s He Playing At?

But, for all his faults, Nigel Farage is a brilliant politician; as a political operator he is head-and-shoulders above any other figure in British political life for decades. He is, perhaps, the Last of the Big Beasts.

Which makes it all the more puzzling that he is risking millions of Red Wall votes by allowing Reform to become an active retirement home for failed Tories.

To take on a few Conservative defectors in the early days was one thing, each of them provided a publicity and credibility puff which helped put Reform in the public eye. But that job is done. It was done and dusted at least a year ago.

Reform is a mile in front of both of the old “natural parties of government” precisely because the public hate them both.

Every single opinion poll since April has shown that the next election is his not to win, but to lose. And associating Reform with the failed Tories is one way to do that.

Continuing to muddy the clear water between Reform and the utterly discredited and electorally toxic Conservative party is an act of political folly, extremely uncharacteristic of the normally wily Farage. What on earth is he thinking of?

Leave a comment

I’ll give you just one example: Nadine Dorries, who Farage welcomed - literally with open arms - into the Reform Party in September,

The presence of this withered old reject is particuarly dangerous to Reform, given her central role in the creation of a piece of legislation whose repeal is central to Reform’s bid to position itself as the champion of traditional freedom.

Here was The Independent, on 2nd November 2021, as it waxed lyrical about how then-Tory Minister Dorries was leading to charge to force through the Online Safty Act - which Reform rightly criticises as ‘dystopian’ and has promised to scrap:

‘The culture secretary has called on the public to use trusted news sites in the fight against misinformation such as vaccine conspiracy theories. Naddine Dorries praised the “properly-sourced, robustly-researched” work of journalists as “our first line of defence” against fake news such as Covid-19 “vaccine conspiracies” facilitated by tech giants.

In an article backing the industry’s ‘Journalism Matters’ campaign, she said the government’s Online Safety Bill would “force tech companies to clean up their sites” and “prevent social media firms from arbitrarily taking down content from respected news organisations”. The bill, she said, also includes “extremely important protections and exemptions for journalists, so that we can protect their free speech while forcing social media platforms to police their sites properly”.’

Freedom for Establishment journalists, but gags and chains for everyone else. How classically Tory!

Imagine the field day assorted media hacks and political opponents will have in the run up to the general election. One by one, they will drag the rotting Conservative skeletons from the closets of Nigel’s growing coterie of Tory turncoats and sinking-ship-jumpers.

The fact these political zombies want to join Reform puts a big hole in its claim to be different. The fact that Farage is willing to haul them out of the water of electoral oblivion and have them on board is even worse.

It’s a shame. Because, while we all know what Farage is, the sheer number of council, devolved Assembly and Westminster seats which Reform look set to win over the next four years will provide a high road into the political mainstream for some thousands of new people.

Some of them will be unprincipled careerists, in it only for themselves. But others, especially among the cohort of young men, getting involved in politics for the first time, will be genuine patriots.

I already know some of them, and they tell me that they are by no means alone among the party’s rising local stars who either subscribe, or are open, to genuinely nationalist ideas. My proposal for the ideological infiltration of the populists is already underway in Reform.

Message Nick Griffin

Conscious nationalists or not, one of the first tasks of the young blood activists in Reform is to work to block the efforts of Nigel’s recycled Tories to worm their way in as prospective parliamentary candidates in Reform’s most promising seats.

They failed the British people before, and they will fail them again. In the deep, long-term sense, this will be true of Reform, since the underlying problems facing this terminally diseased System are not fixable by any mortal effort or hand. But there is a difference between being doomed to fail, but willing and able to do some good on the way down, and being already proven failures and traitors.

Influenced by good young men, the populist parties of the West will have the potential to do worthwhile thing. Things which will help to maximise the number of our people who endure, and come through, the coming Convergence of Catastrophes, Civil War and the Great Dying. Things which give them a headstart in the subsequent Great Rebuilding.

If they are poisoned, discredited, or captured, by elderly refugees from the discredited parties of liberal treachery and incompetence, they won’t even achieve that. This is a time and a place where Gen Z suspicions of Boomers and Xers need to be let rip and put to good use. Keep the old Tories OUT!

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Monday, 17 November 2025

Open Season on Scottish Babies Mammon, Moloch and Ethnocide

 


Open Season on Scottish Babies

Mammon, Moloch and Ethnocide

By Nick Griffin Nov 2025

Grouse are safe on Scottish moors every spring and summer until August 12th, but it will be open season all year round on unborn children in Scotland if a group of blood-thirsty “experts” get their way. The nation already has a catastrophically low birth-rate, but the liberal-left’s response is to push to murder even more unborn Scottish babies.

On November 14, a report was published by the Abortion Law Review in Scotland. This group of “experts” is in fact made up primarily of abortion providers - companies and individuals who profit from butchering babies in the womb.

They have been meeting regularly over the last year to discuss potential changes to the abortion law in Scotland, culminating in a report making recommendations to the Scottish government. If taken, these recommendations would bring about the largest extension of access to abortion since 1967.

Since that date, by the way, more than 10 million British babies have been slaughtered. If you add into the population loss the children and even grandchildren which many of those would have had by now, you realise that abortion has created a British population shortfall of at least 16 million.

The close correlation between that figure and the UK’s immigrant population is no accident. This is the population vacuum which has made mass immigration possible in terms of housing and essential services, necessary economically, and so hard for an unnaturally elderly population to resist.

Actions have consequences, and the action of eliminating 16 million Brits has helped the liberal elite who allowed it to impose their ethnocidal “multi-racial experiment” on us.

Message Nick Griffin

Returning to the deepening abortion horror in Scotland, the worst significant proposals relate to legal grounds for abortion and gestational time limits. Proposals include:

  • Prior to 24-weeks’ gestation (the current legal time limit), all grounds for abortion be removed and only one doctor’s signature should be required. This means on-demand abortion, for any reason, up to 24 weeks.

  • Beyond 24 weeks, abortion be available if two doctors “decide abortion is appropriate”.

  • Decriminalise abortion for women acting in relation to their own pregnancy at any gestation.

Taken together, these proposals will effectively legalise abortion up to birth.

“But hey, it’s only a clump of cells”. That’s another lie exposed by scientific reality

Leave a comment

Additional proposals include:

  • Repeal of The Concealment of Birth (Scotland) Act, which would remove any offence for people concealing the disposal of the bodies of babies delivered following abortion at home

  • Calls for the Scottish government to include “a duty to provide abortion services” – enshrining in law a “right to abortion.”

The proposal is wildly at odds with public opinion in Scotland and the wider UK. Only a tiny and shrinking minority (many of them literal witches, child-hating feminist hags) still support late-term abortion, with widespread support for reduction of the age limit, not its abolition.

Regardless of public opinion, in any case, Abortion is Murder.

And, if you wonder why Britain is so literally God-forsaken, try to answer this question: Why would God NOT forsake a people who sacrifice ten million of their own, innocent, babies on the altars of Mammon and Moloch?

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Go to Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. For the full experience, and upgrade your subscription.