Corporate Greed Poisons America Starmer Trade Deal Puts Brits at Risk Too

 

Corporate Greed Poisons America Starmer Trade Deal Puts Brits at Risk Too By Nick Griffin Follow Nick on Substack Follow Nick on X  Donald Trump’s proposed low regulation America looks set to roar ahead of sclerotic Europe and socialist basket case Britain. But there is one field in which European Union rules are way ahead of the USA – protecting the people from chemicals which are known to be extremely dangerous, but whose use is very profitable for corporations and the big business elite. One of the grave dangers of the Starmer regime’s trade deal with the USA is that we really don’t know how far Britain will end up moving away from the EU rulebook on Forever Chemicals (one of the few good things to have emerged from Brussels) and allowing in US corporate poisons. A number of products and chemicals permitted in the United States are banned or restricted in the European Union due to health concerns, particularly infertility, birth defects, and diseases such as cancer. One of the most dangerous groups of such chemicals are the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) which we examined earlier in this series. These are used in things such as non-stick cookware and water-repellent fabrics. PFAs are carcinogenic and endocrine disruptors, linked to cancers (kidney, prostate, testicular), decreased fertility, and developmental issues in children. To allow such dangers to persist and spread is not sensible deregulation which makes the economy more efficient, it is a crime against the American people. While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set national limits for six PFAS types in drinking water, and states like Minnesota have passed laws restricting unnecessary uses, there is no sign of a federal ban. The European Union, by contrast, is working towards a broad ban on PFAS chemicals. The contrast is even more stark with atrazine. This herbicide is an endocrine disruptor associated with reproductive issues, including infertility and birth defects. The dangers are so clear that atrazine was banned in Europe way back in 2004. In the U.S., extensive lobbying by agri-chemical giants, led by Syngenta, led to a 2020 EPA decision to allow its continued use, with only minor restrictions around use near waterways. Despite the clear dangers, there is at least a case for the very careful use of atrazine, since it undoubtedly does boost food production. No such mitigation, however, is possible when it comes to the use of Butylphenyl Methylpropional (Lilial). This reproductive toxicant, with potential links to infertility, was banned in the European Union (EU) back in 2022. In the USA, this poison remains in widespread use as a fragrance ingredient commonly found in personal care products. We previously explored the dangers of phthalates, chemicals used to make plastics more flexible and durable, and widely used in food packaging. Phthalates are endocrine disruptors linked to hormonal disruption, endometriosis, asthma, obesity, diabetes, and certain cancers. Still in widespread use in America, the EU has banned or restricted a range of them. Our Daily Bread The most remarkable difference in regulation, though, is when it comes to our daily bread. Potassium Bromate is an oxidizing agent used in bread and flour to improve dough strength and rise. Classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, potassium bromate has been linked to cancer in laboratory animals, particularly affecting the kidneys and thyroid. Studies link potassium bromate consumption with renal toxicity and damage, indicating potential risks to human kidney health. Exposure to potassium bromate can irritate the nose, throat, and lungs. Ingestion may cause nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Banned in the EU, Canada and many other countries, it remains legal in the U.S., although many responsible bakers have voluntarily stopped using it. The potassium bromate which continues to poison other American bread is produced by various chemical manufacturers. Notable producers include UK-based Celtic Chemicals Ltd and Nexchem Ltd. Both companies are privately owned by Brits, unlike the other big supplier, Bromate Chemicals, which is located in China. But the sorry story of America’s daily bread doesn’t end there. Azodicarbonamide (ADA) is a chemical compound used as a dough conditioner in the baking industry. Occupational exposure to ADA has been linked to respiratory problems, including asthma and other allergic reactions. The International Programme on Chemical Safety noted that ADA is a human asthmagen, and exposure can lead to respiratory sensitization. When ADA is used in baking, it breaks down into dangerous compounds such as semicarbazide (SEM) and urethane. SEM has been found to cause cancers of the lung and blood vessels in mice. Urethane is recognized as a carcinogen. Despite these health concerns, ADA is still permitted for use in food products in the United States, although banned in the European Union, Australia, and several other countries. Thyroid Cancer Link The final known big issue is Red Dye No. 3 (Erythrosine). This is a synthetic dye used to color foods, beverages and drugs. Its links with thyroid cancers led to the FDA banning its use in cosmetics and externally applied drugs in 1990. Red Dye No. 3 is implicated in hyperactivity and other behavioral problems in children, including ADHD. There are also concerns over allergies, neurological effects and a broader range of cancers. The worries are so grave that the U.S. is scheduled to catch up with the long-standing EU ban, with manufacturers required to remove it from products by January 2027. Many of Donald Trump’s deregulation plans are welcome common sense. But Americans must be vigilant that the corporate lobbyists do not exploit this, in order to profit from the poisoning of America. And Brits do as well, because, in this case, a move away from Europe is a move towards corporate poisoning! Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid The Poisoning of America Nick Griffin · Nov 27 Note to British readers: This is the first part of a series on the corporate poisoning of the USA. I wrote these for the American Free Press but most of this shocking catalogue of big business greed is all too relevent here at home as well. Apologies for the US spellings. Read full story If you appreciate my work, but aren’t yet ready to become a paid subscriber on Substack, perhaps you’d feel good at least buying me a coffee. “Many a mickle maks a muckle”, as my ancestors on my fairly remote Scottish side would have said. Thank you! “Buy Me a Coffee” HERE

Parasitic global elites have reached the end of road after AI disaster: Neil Oliver and Nick Hudson

Neil Oliver and Nick Hudson discuss the faltering global system as AI hopes are dashed and citizens turn on the elites.

THESE are the most-read articles The Conservative Woman has published in the past week.

 THESE are the most-read articles The Conservative Woman has published in the past week.

1 The heresy of putting the baby Jesus into a people-smugglers’ dinghy – Gavin Ashenden

2 Del Dimmock – the gout patient who died on end-of-life ‘care’ pathway – Sally Beck

3 Hope Not Hate’s sordid attempt to smear ‘Young Bob’ – Norman Fenton

4 Bondi Beach Jewish Hanukkah Massacre – a survivor’s account – TCW

5 The US and Europe are at odds over the Western values they used to share – Bruce News

6 Has the BBC met its nemesis in Trump’s formidable $5billion suit? – David Keighley

7 Bondi is yet another bloodbath in a global intifada abetted by Western idiots – Paul Collits

8 Proud, fervent, diverse – Unite the Kingdom carol service’s message of hope – John Wycliffe

9 The climate scaremongers: The billion pound green energy bill missing from the Budget – Paul Homewood

10 What hope for peace in Ukraine now? – Kathy Gyngell

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but

 there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. 

Assisted Suicide for Pregnant Women Labour Peer Drags Britain Towards the Pit

 

Assisted Suicide for Pregnant Women Labour Peer Drags Britain Towards the Pit y  “Pregnancy should not be a bar” to assisted suicide, according to the Labour peer pushing state-sanctioned murder through the House of Lords Lord Charles Leslie Falconer, Baron Falconer of Thoroton, made this shocking statement as the Assisted Dying bill was debated in the Upper Chamber. Falconer served as Secretary of State for Justice under Prime Minister Tony Blair and is both a longtime advocate of assisted suicide and the bill’s sponsor in the Lords. “There is a big issue here,” Lord Craig Mackinlay, Baron Mackinlay of Richborough, told the peers. “In other states around the world who have had assisted dying for some time have differences of view. In Oregon, since 1997, there is a requirement to keep the mother alive as long as possible, particularly when there is a viable fetus.” “The Netherlands takes a completely different view, and that is one of feticide, where the fetus has to be terminated by one means or another,” he continued. “Often by intracardiac injection of potassium chloride before the mother can be euthanized.” “On which end of the scale does [the noble lord] refer these things, because we are in a situation where the Royal Colleges are against his whole system, and we will be relying on them to fill in the gaps of this legislation,” Lord Mackinlay concluded. “I think it is incumbent on us to fill in those gaps for them, because they’re not keen on this.” “The noble lord puts it accurately,” Lord Falconer responded. “Some countries have taken one view, and other countries have taken another. It’s clear from the choice that I am supporting that we take the view that pregnancy should not be a bar to it.” Lord Falconer’s single, clinical statement is the reductio ad absurdum—or perhaps the inevitable conclusion—of the Culture of Death: a pregnant woman being euthanised, with her baby being killed either just prior to her own demise by lethal injection or perishing with her. The conscience of Lord Falconer is so hardened that the spectre of this double killing does not cause him to bat an eye. After all, Westminster just decriminalised abortion until birth—why should the life of a viable baby be a barrier to a mother’s suicide? Right To Life UK @RightToLifeUK SHOCKING! Lord Falconer says “pregnancy should not be a bar” to assisted suicide! After Lord Mackinlay ( @cmackinlay ) tells Peers that Oregon protects viable unborn babies from assisted suicide, Lord Falconer seems completely unmoved & unbothered about this issue. 4:09 PM ∙ Dec 12, 2025 3120 likes • 1025 reposts Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale! Please share this post and help to spread awareness of this revolting child-murdering proposal, and the wickedness behind it. Share

RTC - A Gift for Nationalist Community Builders What Is To Be Done Part 7

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more RTC - A Gift for Nationalist Community Builders What Is To Be Done Part 7 By Nick Griffin Follow Nick On Substack Follow Nick on X We have settled on the true meaning of “building community”. It is not helping a community in search of votes. It is not building comradeship in an isolated nationalist organisation. It is finding ways to help to strengthen the bonds within an existing community. Having clarified what the concept really means, the question we now have to answer is what can be done to turn it into reality. Let’s start by visualising a group of increasingly typical young nationalists. They may have met online, through an existing organisation or through educational or social contacts. They have probably then been influenced by the slogan “Tribe and Train” to start getting together for regular sessions in the gym. Great stuff! Young men should glory in, and hone, their new-found strength. Perhaps they’ve gone out to put up a few stickers, exchanged and discussed a few politically incorrect books. Over the summer they might have gone for hikes ending in a country pub, or spent the evening round a campfire and slept out under the stars. Good for them. They’ve built comradeship. They’re fitter than they were and have confidence and esprit de corps. Now, what are they going to do with it? In simple terms, they’ve got three real choices: 1) Keep going as they are until, one-by-one, they drift off into the mundane responsibilities of life. Work, university (bad choice for most, but some are still making it), fatherhood (best choice, but still too rare) and so on. It was fun while it lasted, but slips into the past, having made no real difference; 2) Get ‘radical’. Get themselves a black gym uniform, masks and an ‘extremist’ banner. Post photos online of themselves with heavyweights and empty heads. Get infiltrated, or grassed up by one of the creeps who encourages such groups because that’s how Judas Goat agent provocateurs earn their thirty pieces of silver. Get arrested and caught with those politically incorrect books. Get thrown into prison. Get their lives ruined, having made no real difference; 3) Stay clean, not just of drugs, but of the dangerous mental drug that is heart-on-sleeve far-right radicalism. Studiously avoid given any hints of ‘extremism’ which would draw attention to their group. Take a good look at the place where they live, decide exactly what sort of real community work they are going to undertake, and make a start. Fortunately, those who make that third, saving choice don’t have far to look. At least not in Britain or Ireland, though I am sure that those in other countries will find something with similar promise if they will only look. The Raise the Colours operation has visually transformed working and lower middle-class areas of England, Scotland and Wales into mainland versions of their counterparts in Northern Ireland. In some cases, this was centrally organised by activists tied in to one extent or another with the Counter Jihad network. I will not repeat what I’ve said in early essays and videos about how these civic nationalist, Zionist-funded traitors are no friends of the ordinary people of Britain. I will, however, grant that the ‘Ulsterisation’ of Britain, which their social media teams have helped to unleash, presents a golden opportunity to nationalists who decide to stop fooling around with risky slogans and get down to real local community work. YourTown Flagsters Step 1 Try to find out precisely who put up the flags in your patch. If people in the local working-class pub are reticent, you could try putting up some more. Now it is firmly established as legal, this piece of identitarian action is as safe and easy as it is dramatic. If you can find them, see if they want help to turn their initial effort into a permanent, loosely organised team effort. Don’t get political on them; if at present they love Tommeh and Israel just bite your tongue, you’ll have plenty of time to educate them gently once you’ve been out flagging with them on a few rainy nights leading up to St. George’s Day. If you find them and they don’t want help, don’t worry. If they’re soft, disorganised and not motivated for the long haul, just aim to leapfrog them. After all, you’ve already got a tight-knit and confident group. If by chance they’re tough, determined and hostile to people treading on their turf, just shift your sights a mile or so and find a patch they’ve not touched. If you can’t find them at all, move on to - Step 2 Produce a simple leaflet/poster, on behalf of “YourTown Flagsters” (“flaggers” is a term deliberately chosen by hostile leftists in the media on account of the connotations of the word ‘flagging’) and tape it onto a few of the lamp posts decked with flags. You may need to put a few fresh flags up in places where there is more pedestrian traffic. The leaflet needn’t be glossy and professional. In fact, that would scream of ‘outsiders’ who don’t need help in any case, so the more home-made and amateur it is, the better. Here’s some basic text for you to use or adapt: We’re the YourTown Flagsters – We’re here to help turn the Raise The Colours display into a regular show of pride in YourTown and England. We’re not political. We’re not ‘against’ anyone. We just LOVE our flags, our community and our country. We’re here to look after our flags. We’re going to replace them with proud new ones when they get tatty. We’re here to pressure the council if they start sending Jobsworths to take them down. You can help! Volunteer to help us put up more flags. Keep an eye out for anyone taking them down – take photos if possible, note number plates, and call us IMMEDIATELY. Donate or help raise money, so we can put up even more flags and make YourTown even more colourful and proud. Call any time on 07….. [Your burner phone number] Of course, all this material should also go on a local Facebook page, complete with photos and video clips of your flags waving. Keep it completely non-political, but look for opportunities to support and advertise other local good causes and events. Step 3 Visit people who call you and keep a simple record of what they’re willing to do to help. Bear in mind that at least one caller, who won’t want to give you his or her address, will be working for the local press, while another will be working for the police. But so what? You’re doing nothing illegal, and you are saying nothing political. Look out for opportunities like a collection box in a local pub or shop. Work to extend your team beyond your initial group. Their political opinions, or lack of them, don’t matter. You’re looking for local contacts, willing hands, donations and eyes and ears in the community. Nothing more, nothing less. Step 4 In the run-up to your national saint’s day, get to work putting up new flags. Study how certain ways of securing them last much better than others. The experts in Northern Ireland fix theirs to wooden battens, and then cable tie the battens to the lamp posts, rather than using cable ties through just two eyelets, which rip quite easily. Experiment with knocking doors in your target street. Carry a bag of new flags to show people, tell them you’re going to be decorating their street for St. George’s (Andrew’s/David’s) Day and ask if they’d like to give a fiver to pay for a flag. Keep a note of those who do, because they are going to be important in future Community Building operations which will go way beyond your Flagster beginnings. Now it’s confirmed that councils in most areas have decided that putting up flags is legal, there’s not generally any reason to do it at dead of night. You should certainly NOT be putting any where they really do pose a traffic hazard, or where they are going to antagonise large ethnic minority communities. The aim of all this is to inspire and unify our people, to prepare them to be sympathetic to work for our communities. There is nothing to be gained by winding up, and uniting, any of the ‘Others’. Especially as our real problem isn’t with them, but with our own liberal traitors. Step 5 When you’ve gathered a good few local sympathisers, try to find a venue for a get-together and fund-raiser. Most pubs are struggling and landlords are quite likely to favour a BBQ or Quiz night which brings a couple of dozen extra drinks-buyers in on an otherwise quiet evening. Or, if YourTown is already under a Reform council, you may well be able to get a council premises for such an event. Now that’s an early milestone in embedding yourself in the community. At about this time, you should find that pro-flag people who know your team are sufficiently sympathetic to you for it to be possible to spend a bit of social time with them and to gradually mould their political opinions. This is important, because the flagster team is only the first step. As we will see in the next chapter of What Is To Be Done, the aim is to use this operation as a springboard. You may already have made YourTown widely admired as a place with far more flags than neighbouring places, but there are many more things to be done on the road to turning it into a Community Strongpoint. But you can’t do them all yourself, so your team has to grow, so you need to recruit new people and to turn soft, civnat contacts into real nationalists. Step 6 Even when no routine flag renewal date is due, raise some extra money and get a fresh supply in. Tatty or stolen flags will need replacing from time to time and, sooner or later, some external event will demand a rapid response. This could be anything from the council taking down existing flags, to a major terrorist attack which raises nationalist passions among the public. Be ready, because a quick and effective response will cement your reputation among sympathetic local people. Step 7 Prepare for Remembrance Day. The Chinese have discovered that there is a market for all sorts of poppy-themed decorations as November comes around. This means that they are very cheap and readily available. Get some pictures or some samples and go and visit all your previous donors. Most will happily chip in to put giant poppies on the lamp posts and strings of small ones in roadside garden hedges, etc. Publicans and even decent vicars (there are still some) may also be happy to host displays. Whoever else joins in, for about £100 you can turn key places in YourTown into a mass display of Remembrance pride. Make sure that the whole area knows that it’s another YourTown Flagster operation. If you’re the first group to do so, you’re going to make a lot more local friends, and help build the contacts and trust you’ll need for the next steps in building a real community – with you and your nationalist ideals at its beating heart. What do you do next? Or what else could you do if, for some very unlikely reason, Your town doesn’t have a gap for a Flagster Team? I’ll be setting it all out here very shortly, so become a free subscriber so you don’t miss it. Or a paid one to how you appreciate my work. Thank you! If you appreciate my work, but aren’t yet ready to become a paid subscriber on Substack, perhaps you’d feel good at least buying me a coffee. “Many a mickle maks a muckle”, as my ancestors on my fairly remote Scottish side would have said. Thank you! “Buy Me a Coffee” HERE What Is to be Done? Nick Griffin · Oct 15 The way ahead for genuine nationalists is at last clear. There has been a period of confusion and drift since the political establishments of country after country beat down the nationalist electoral insurgencies which once appeared to be the way forward. But this must - and will - end now. Read full story

 

An Occupied Nation: The Menorah on the Lawn

• Andrew Torba
• December , 2025

The Supreme Court ruled Christian symbols cannot be displayed. Jewish symbols can. This tells you everything about who rules America.

In 1989, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one of the most revealing rulings in American legal history. In Allegheny County v. ACLU, the Court held that a Christian nativity scene displayed on government property violated the Establishment Clause. It was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. But in that very same ruling, the Court held that a Jewish menorah displayed by the government was perfectly constitutional.

Read that again. Let it sink in.

A nativity scene depicting the birth of Jesus Christ—the central event of the faith that built Western civilization, that founded this nation, that animated its laws and customs and holidays for centuries—is forbidden. But a menorah celebrating Hanukkah—a minor Jewish festival commemorating a military victory that has nothing to do with American history or heritage—is permitted.

This was the legal establishment of Jewish religious supremacy over Christianity in the public square.

Walk past the White House during the Christmas season and witness the fruit of this ruling. You will see a menorah. You will not see a nativity scene.

The residence of the American president—the leader of a nation founded by Christians, built by Christians, populated overwhelmingly by Christians—displays the religious symbol of a tiny 2% minority of our nation’s people while the symbol of the faith of the majority is legally forbidden. This is not an accident, it is a statement of power. A humiliation ritual of a conquering tribe over a conquered nation.

Every year, the President of the United States hosts a Hanukkah celebration at the White House. Jewish leaders gather in the people’s house to celebrate a Jewish holiday with Jewish prayers and Jewish ceremonies. The President lights the menorah and praises America’s commitment to the Jewish people and the Jewish state.

At last night’s Hanukkah event, the Jewish commentator Mark Levin declared: “Six years ago I said Trump is our first Jewish president.” Trump’s response? “It’s true.” This is the same Mark Levin who, when confronted by a young White man suggesting that Mark’s poor behavior fuels antisemitism, replied with: “It’s in your family’s DNA.” 

Consider what this means. The President of the United States publicly affirms that he governs as a Jewish president. This is said openly, proudly, at an official White House religious ceremony. And no one blinks. No one objects. No one points out the staggering implications of the leader of a Christian nation declaring himself to be, in effect, a servant of Jewish interests.

Imagine if a President attended a Christmas celebration and said, “I am America’s first truly Christian president. My administration serves Christ and His Church above all.” The howling would be deafening. The lawsuits would be immediate. The media would declare a constitutional crisis. But a President declaring himself a Jewish president at a Jewish religious ceremony in the White House? This is normal. This is expected. This is simply how power operates in occupied America.

There is a deeper theological irony that most Christians never consider. Hanukkah commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple—the very temple that God Himself would utterly demolish within the generation of Christ’s resurrection.

Jesus prophesied this destruction explicitly. “Do you see all these great buildings?” He asked His disciples as they admired the temple. “Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down” (Mark 13:2). In 70 AD, this prophecy was fulfilled with terrible precision. The Roman legions under Titus razed the temple so completely that its very foundations were torn apart. God did not preserve His house. He demolished it, permanently. There has been no temple for nearly two thousand years, and there never will be again, because the temple’s purpose was fulfilled in Christ. He is the temple now. His body, broken and risen, replaced the building of stone.

Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of a structure that God rejected and destroyed. To celebrate Hanukkah is to celebrate a building that Christ rendered obsolete. It is to honor a sacrificial system that His sacrifice ended. It is to cling to shadows when the substance has come.

But there is something darker still. The Gospel of John records that Jesus was in Jerusalem during the Feast of Dedication—Hanukkah—when the Jews surrounded Him in the temple courts and demanded He tell them plainly if He was the Christ. When He answered, declaring “I and the Father are one,” they picked up stones to kill Him (John 10:22-31). Hanukkah, in the scriptural record, is the feast during which the Jews attempted to murder the Son of God for declaring His divinity.

This is what Christians celebrate when they light the menorah and wish their Jewish neighbors a happy Hanukkah. They celebrate the feast of Christ’s rejection. They celebrate the day stones were gathered to kill Him. They celebrate a temple that God Himself destroyed as judgment for that rejection.

Any Christian who participates in Hanukkah willingly mocks the Gospel. They side with those who rejected Christ against Christ Himself. They honor a religious system that God abolished in fire and blood. They treat the murderous rejection of the Messiah as a festive occasion worthy of celebration.

This is not interfaith goodwill. This is apostasy with a smile.

To maintain the illusion that Christians and Jews share common cause, a linguistic fiction was invented: the “Judeo-Christian tradition.” This phrase, which was nonexistent prior to the 1930’s, is now ubiquitous in conservative discourse. It is invoked endlessly by politicians, pundits, and pastors who wish to appear both pious and politically safe. It is, in reality, an anti-Christian fabrication. A contradiction in terms designed to obscure fundamental theological realities for political purposes.

There is no Judeo-Christian tradition. There is Christianity, which teaches that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the promised Messiah, the fulfillment of all Old Testament prophecy, and the only path to salvation. And there is Judaism, which explicitly rejects all of this. Jews hold that Jesus was a false messiah, a blasphemer, and a deceiver. These are mutually exclusive truth claims. One of them is right and the other is wrong. They cannot both be true, and pretending they represent a shared “tradition” is either ignorance or deception.

The term “Judeo-Christian” was virtually unknown before the twentieth century. It was popularized in mid-century America as part of a deliberate campaign to reshape American identity and to downplay the specifically Christian character of the nation and to elevate Judaism to equal status despite Jews comprising a tiny fraction of the population. The goal was not theological accuracy but political utility: to bind Christians to Jewish interests, to make support for Israel a religious obligation, and to silence any Christian who might notice that Jewish political activism frequently undermines Christian values and Christian communities.

The effect of “Judeo-Christian” language is to Judaize the faith. It implies that Christianity is incomplete without Judaism, that the Church needs the Synagogue, that Christ’s finished work on the cross must be supplemented by ongoing deference to those who reject Him. This is theological nonsense and dangerous nonsense at that. Christ declared “It is finished.” The veil of the temple was torn. The old covenant was fulfilled and superseded. Christianity is not a branch of Judaism; it is the fulfillment of everything the Old Testament promised and the replacement of everything the old covenant instituted.

Who benefits from this arrangement? Who benefits when Christians are taught that their faith requires them to support a foreign ethnostate? Who benefits when American treasure flows by the billions to a nation on the other side of the world? Who benefits when American soldiers die in wars that serve Israeli interests? Who benefits when any criticism of these policies is instantly denounced as bigotry and hatred?

Not the American people. Not American Christians. Not the young men who come home in coffins from Middle Eastern wars. Not the taxpayers who fund Iron Dome while their own cities crumble. Not the families who watch their wealth eroded by inflation while foreign aid flows uninterrupted.

The “Judeo-Christian” deception is a mechanism of exploitation. It takes the sincere faith of American Christians and their desire to be faithful to Scripture and to stand on the right side of biblical prophecy and weaponizes it to advance interests that are not their own. It transforms Christian piety into a blank check for a foreign nation and a domestic lobby.

And it works. It works because good-hearted Christians have been taught that questioning this arrangement is sin. It works because pastors repeat the propaganda from their pulpits. It works because politicians know that waving the Israeli flag guarantees evangelical support. It works because the machinery of influence operates so smoothly that most Americans never stop to ask why their supposedly secular government hosts religious ceremonies for one faith while banning the symbols of another.

We are an occupied nation. This is not hyperbole. This is a precise description of our political reality.

An occupation does not require foreign troops on the streets. It requires foreign interests controlling the levers of power. It requires the occupied population funding and fighting for the occupier’s benefit. It requires the suppression of any resistance, any dissent, any recognition of what is happening.

By these measures, America is occupied territory. Our foreign policy is made in Tel Aviv. Our domestic discourse is policed by organizations that explicitly serve Jewish interests. Our laws permit Jewish religious displays while banning Christian ones. Our presidents declare themselves servants of a foreign nation. And anyone who states these plain facts is destroyed—professionally, socially, financially.

The menorah on the White House lawn is a symbol of conquest. It says: we rule here. It says: your symbols are forbidden, ours are celebrated. It says: your faith is subordinate to ours. It says: this is our house now.

The first step toward liberation is recognition. You cannot free yourself from a bondage you refuse to see. You cannot resist an occupation you insist does not exist. The “Judeo-Christian” spell must be broken. The legal double standard must be named. The political reality must be acknowledged.

Christianity does not need Judaism. The Church is not incomplete without the Synagogue. Support for Israel is not a biblical mandate, it is a political position, and one that can be questioned, criticized, and rejected like any other political position. The interests of the Jewish state are not identical to the interests of the American nation, and pretending otherwise is not faithfulness but foolishness.

Christ is King not one king among many, not a junior partner in a Judeo-Christian alliance, but the King of Kings and Lord of Lords before whom every knee shall bow. His Church is not a subset of Judaism but its fulfillment. His people are not defined by ethnicity but by faith. And His Kingdom will not be inherited by those who reject Him, no matter how much political power they accumulate in the meantime.

The menorah stands on the White House lawn. The nativity is banned. One president after another declares loyalty to a foreign nation. And Christians are told this is their tradition, their obligation, their faith.

It is time to reject the lie. It is time to reclaim what was stolen. It is time to remember whose nation this is—and whose it is not.

Christ is King. America is a Christian nation. And no amount of legal sophistry or political theater can change that truth.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King

'The age of democracy is behind us' Neil Oliver: lobalist elites have 'no more moves to make'

Neil Oliver says the 'long-running farce' of democracy is behind the West.