Search This Blog

Sunday, 8 March 2026

The Essence of Zionism


The Essence of Zionism

A Metaphysical and Historical Analysis

Alexander Dugin argues that Zionism is Judaism’s heretical rebellion where Jews declare themselves God, seize the Holy Land by force, and plunge tradition into apocalyptic upheaval.

In the modern world, the Middle East remains the epicenter of geopolitical conflicts, where the interests of various forces intersect, including Islam, Judaism, and global powers. Particular attention is drawn to Zionism as the state ideology of Israel, which, in the view of many analysts, carries an eschatological dimension linked to the end times.

Like any religion, Judaism is a complex phenomenon encompassing metaphysics, history, and philosophy, with numerous interpretations that sometimes contradict one another. We will examine how Zionism fits into this tradition and why it can be perceived as both its continuation and, at the same time, its refutation.

Share

Judaism as a religion is tied to the idea that the Jews are the chosen people. Primarily in a religious sense, because this people was chosen to:

  • remain faithful to the one God at a time when other nations, according to Judaism, had departed from this monotheism, and

  • await His messenger, the Messiah (Mashiach), who will be crowned King of Israel and Ruler of the world.

The Hebrew word mashiach means “anointed” or “anointed for kingship.” The same word in Greek is Christos. But Christianity is founded on the conviction that the Messiah has already come into the world. That is our religion. The fundamental difference from Judaism lies in the fact that Jews believe the Messiah has not yet come and do not recognize Jesus Christ as the Messiah. This is the core distinction.

An extremely interesting point arises next. According to the Jewish religion, the Jews went into exile at the beginning of the first millennium, in the 70s AD (the fourth exile). This occurred after the Romans carried out a punitive operation against the rebellious province. The Second Temple was destroyed. The Jews left Palestine (the Holy Land). And thus began the two-thousand-year era of dispersion.

This era has religious meaning, as detailed in Jewish tradition. The purpose of the dispersion is to atone for the sins of Israel accumulated in previous historical stages. If this atonement is genuine and repentance (teshuvah) is profound, according to Jewish tradition, the Mashiach will appear as a blessing from the Jewish God for the deeds of His chosen people. In such a case, the appearance of the Mashiach will be a sign from above for the return of the Jews to Israel, the establishment of independent statehood, and the building of the Third Temple in Jerusalem on the site of the destroyed Second Temple.

In principle, the most consistent representatives of this Jewish approach are certain fundamentalists from the Neturei Karta movement or the Satmar Hasidim, who say something like: “Our Jewish God commanded us to endure the hardships of exile; let us wait for its end, let us atone for our sins, and when the Mashiach comes (but not before!), we will return to Israel, the Promised Land.” They rely on the fact that the Talmud contains a clear prohibition against a mass return to Palestine before the coming of the Mashiach, and especially against achieving it through force.

The Talmud prohibits it and firmly asserts: first the Mashiach, then the return to Israel, and no other way.

Here a question arises: how, then, was the State of Israel created when, apparently, the Mashiach has still not come? Even the most extreme Zionists do not claim that he has arrived.

To understand how it happened that the modern Israeli state stands in complete contradiction to Jewish religion in its orthodox, Talmudic formulation, we must dig deeper and go back at least to the 17th century, to the era of the pseudo-messiah Sabbatai Zevi. As Gershom Scholem writes, he was the first harbinger of Zionism.

Sabbatai Zevi declared that he himself was the Mashiach, and therefore the Jews now had the right to return to the Promised Land.

Sabbatai Zevi met a tragic end. When he arrived before the Ottoman sultan demanding that Palestine be handed over to him as the Messiah, the Ottoman sultan said: “I have another proposal for you, Mr. Sabbatai Zevi: if you continue spouting this nonsense, I will cut off your head. But if you want to survive, immediately accept Islam.”

At this point, Sabbatai Zevi makes a strange gesture. He puts on a turban and says: “You are right, you win; I am no Messiah—let me now preach Islam.”

He was spared, but what disappointment, what a blow to the Jewish community that was already prepared to embrace Sabbateanism! Sabbateanism was rejected by orthodox Judaism, but it did not disappear completely and continued to spread, especially among Ashkenazi Jews in Eastern Europe, almost underground. In the very same regions where it spread, Hasidism began to take shape—a movement that lacked sharp eschatological and messianic orientation but emphasized the dissemination of Kabbalah among ordinary people. Traditionally, Kabbalah could only be studied by elderly rabbis who had mastered all other forms of Talmudic learning.

But what happened in some Sabbatean sects? A theory emerged that Sabbatai Zevi was in fact the true Messiah, and he entered Islam deliberately because he committed a sacred betrayal. What is sacred betrayal? An entire theology of sacred betrayal developed, asserting that Jews could renounce their faith and outwardly enter another religion but only for appearance, in order to undermine it from within, while secretly continuing to profess Judaism.

Later, the Sabbatean Jacob Frank converted to Catholicism. Moreover, he supplied Catholic censors with so-called evidence of the “blood libel”—the legend that “Jews eat Christian infants.” He insisted on this as a converted Jew himself and provided “irrefutable evidence.” Frank completely abandoned all forms of Talmudism and renounced his faith, betraying his coreligionists. Yet he had justification. The secret doctrine of Frank, like that of Sabbatai Zevi, claimed that after the 17th century, the very concept of the Mashiach had changed. Now the Mashiach is the Jews themselves. There is no need to wait for some separate Mashiach—the Jews are the Mashiach.

Therefore, even if a Jew betrays his religion, he remains holy because he is holiness itself; he is God.

Thus, an intellectual environment was created for Zionism.

The essence of Zionism lies in it being a kind of “Jewish Satanism.” Not Satanism in relation to other peoples or cultures, but Satanism within Judaism—that is, an inversion of values. If classical orthodox Judaism insists that the meaning of Jewish existence in dispersion (galut) consists in awaiting the Mashiach, who will come from outside, and only then should one return to the Promised Land, Zionism is based on the principle that the Jews themselves are God. Therefore, they can return to Palestine right now and can do so by force, thereby rejecting the Talmudic prohibition and proceeding to build the Third Temple. The appearance of the Mashiach will be the culmination of this messianic process, but in essence, every Israeli is the Mashiach.

Hence the completely specific relationship between Zionism and Judaism. On one hand, Zionism is a continuation of Judaism; on the other, it is a refutation of Judaism, since it rejects the most fundamental principles of Judaism: the culture of pious waiting and the culture of repentance (teshuvah).

Moreover, Zionists assert that the Jews have nothing to repent for—they have suffered enough. The Jews are God—not merely “the people of God,” but God Himself. Therefore, no law applies to them; they are their own law.

This explains the fundamental feature of the modern Zionist movement, which relies not only on Israel but also on a vast number of secular Jews, liberal Jews, atheist Jews, communist Jews, capitalist Jews, Christian Jews, Protestant Jews, Catholic Jews, Orthodox Jews, Muslim Jews, Hare Krishna Jews, neospiritualist Jews, occultist Jews—all types of Jews who in fact represent a network of generalized Frankism. Precisely because they collectively and individually are now the Mashiach, each of them can calmly engage in sacred betrayal while not sinning against their essence.

This is an immanent messianism in which the concepts of Mashiach and the Jews themselves have swapped places. Zionists no longer wait for the Mashiach—they themselves are the Mashiach, and therefore there is no one and nothing left to wait for. All that remains is to rely on their own strength and their own global networks to assert world domination and build their Israeli state, disregarding the local population or any other costs.

This is served by the formal prohibition on criticizing Zionism that operates in some American states, where anti-Zionism is equated with anti-Semitism.

If we look closely, we notice that the State of Israel itself wages war against Semites—that is, against the Palestinians, Arabs who are pure Semites. Moreover, Zionist ideology cannot even be fully called “Jewish” because it is based on the refutation of the basic principles of Judaism. If there is no waiting for the Mashiach, then what Judaism is there?

The very existence of the State of Israel is, in the eyes of Zionists, proof that they are the Mashiach. Otherwise, the state would not have arisen. They attribute all credit for its creation exclusively to themselves and their networks. Since it succeeded, they believe, it was done with God’s help.

Then only one step remains: to blow up the Al-Aqsa Mosque and proceed to build the Third Temple, which is precisely what the extreme Zionist group—the Temple Mount Faithful movement—calls for. Enormous funds have recently been allocated for research on the Temple Mount.

Since Zionism has such a profound metaphysical underpinning, taming it with UN appeals or futile cries of “let’s make peace, let’s respect human rights” is pointless.

We are in the thick of eschatological scenarios with a very deep metaphysical basis. The situation is becoming increasingly alarming, far exceeding the bounds of habitual banal explanations—economy, markets, oil prices, stock exchanges, national interests, and so on—which are becoming more and more contradictory and even absurd.

We live in very interesting times, but the price for the opportunity to live in them is that parts of our consciousness are simply blocked or paralyzed. If we step beyond the hypnosis, fog, nonsense, absurdity, and postmodern fragmentation of consciousness, we will see a very interesting and terrifying picture of what is happening in the Middle East.

The mentioned figures:

  • Gershom Scholem (1897–1982): Israeli historian and specialist in Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah). Considered the founder of the modern academic study of Kabbalah. Scholem described Sabbatai Zevi as a harbinger of Zionism, emphasizing how messianic movements influenced Jewish history.

  • Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676): Jewish mystic and false messiah who proclaimed himself the Mashiach in the 17th century. His movement (Sabbateanism) generated massive enthusiasm among Jews but ended with his conversion to Islam. This event influenced the development of antinomianism (violation of laws for “spiritual purification”) in Jewish sects.

  • Jacob Frank (1726–1791): Founder of Frankism, a religious movement combining elements of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Frank claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi and preached “purification through transgression” (sacred betrayal), including the rejection of traditional Judaism. His followers (Frankists) contributed to antisemitic campaigns, such as blood libel accusations.

  • Neturei Karta: An anti-Zionist ultra-Orthodox Jewish group founded in 1938. They view Zionism as an affront to God, since Jews should not return to Israel en masse or by force before the Mashiach comes. The group advocates the peaceful dissolution of the State of Israel and supports the Palestinians.

References to books and sources:

Gershom Scholem, Sabbatai Sevi: The Mystical Messiah, 1626-1676 (Princeton University Press, 1973): A classic biography of Sabbatai Zevi, where Scholem analyzes him as a precursor to Zionism. The book emphasizes how messianic expectations evolved into political movements.

Paweł Maciejko, The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankist Movement, 1755-1816 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011): The first comprehensive study of Frank and Frankism, showing its influence on Jewish-Christian relations.

Talmud (Ketubot 111a): Contains the “Three Oaths”—a metaphor in which the Jews swear not to “ascend as a wall” (mass return) to the Land of Israel before the Mashiach, not to rebel against the nations, and not to hasten the end times. This is interpreted as a prohibition on creating Israel.

Yotav Eliach, Judaism, Zionism and the Land of Israel (Wise Path Books, 2018): An overview of 4,000 years of Jewish history, focusing on the religious and ideological aspects of Zionism.

Yitzhak Conforti, Zionism and Jewish Culture: A Study in the Origins of a National Movement (Academic Studies Press, 2024): A study of the cultural roots of Zionism, including the balance between tradition and modernity.

Yossi Shain, The Israeli Century: How the Zionist Revolution Changed History and Reinvented Judaism (Post Hill Press, 2021): An analysis of how Zionism transformed Jewish identity from diaspora to sovereignty.

Derek Penslar, Zionism: An Emotional State (Rutgers University Press, 2023)—on the emotional aspects of Zionism.

Marjorie N. Feld, The Threshold of Dissent: A History of American Jewish Critics of Zionism (NYU Press, 2024)—on Jewish critics of Zionism.

Multipolar Press is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

  Crime is rising. Immigration is out of control and people feel the demographic foundations of the country shifting beneath them.   The cost of living burdens ordinary families. Freedom of speech is narrowing. British culture is being eroded, our history demeaned, and public services fail the people they exist to serve.   The Britain I grew up believing in feels further and further away.   Like many people, I reached the point where I felt politically homeless.   That is why I am giving my support to Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain.   Lowe is not a career politician. He speaks plainly, with courage and conviction, about the things many people quietly feel but rarely hear said from the political and cultural establishment.   For the first time in a long time I see a movement that speaks about restoring competence, sovereignty and pride in our country.   If you care about Britain’s future, I would encourage you to listen to what Rupert Lowe has to say.   And if you feel the same love for this country that I do, consider giving Restore Britain your support and join the party.   For the love of this country, and for the generations who will inherit it, we must find the courage to restore Britain. United as one.

Saturday, 7 March 2026

Orwell was pointing out a type of person


 “In left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman, and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse-racing to suet puddings. It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably true, that almost any English intellectual would feel more ashamed of standing to attention while ‘God Save the King’ was played than of stealing from the poor-box.”

— George Orwell, The Lion and the Unicorn (1941) Orwell was pointing out a type of person who sneers at their own country as if that makes them clever. Not because they’ve thought deeply about anything, but because they think mockery itself is a mark of superiority. The tone of it hasn’t changed. The same kind of people are still here. The same smirk. The same false performance of being “above” England. You see it across media, universities, arts, politics - this little ritual of laughing at everything English: the history, the songs, the traditions, the parades, the accents, the villages, the old ways of doing things. As if scorn is the height of sophistication. Meanwhile the ordinary Englishman hasn’t changed. He doesn’t make a spectacle of loyalty, but it’s there - in how he speaks about home, in how he looks after his own, in how he stands when something needs to be stood for. It’s quiet, steady, and real. The divide Orwell talks about is still obvious: There are those who feel duty and belonging. And there are those who think they are above both. The first group doesn’t need to explain itself

Friday, 6 March 2026

Nick Griffin - The Purim War and a Demographic White Pill

 

More Articles from TWC March 2026

 

TCW Daily

Britain is beginning to feel like a conquered land

Daniel Jupp
Britain is beginning to feel like a conquered land

SO IT was the end of Ramadan on Wednesday or early yesterday. I don’t care about this. My position is that if people want to not eat during daylight hours because a psychopathic 7th century bandit and child rapist thought that was a good idea, or because imams subsequent to Muhammad have done so, it’s […]

Keir the Unready betrays British interests in a war everyone else saw coming

Bruce Newsome
Keir the Unready betrays British interests in a war everyone else saw coming

ONE of the paradoxes of Sir Keir Starmer’s position on war with Iran is that he insisted that Britain must stay defensive but was unprepared to defend British interests and assets from Iran. How can Starmer insist on the lawfulness of defensiveness and still be defensively unprepared? For months, Donald Trump has been publicly warning […]

Eco-zealotry is making Australia fatally dependent on China

Howard Dewhirst
Eco-zealotry is making Australia fatally dependent on China

I AM A retired geologist living in Australia and am hugely concerned that the rush to Net Zero is not only unnecessary, but is pushing my country towards a fatal dependence on sometimes hostile overseas sources of what we need to maintain our standard of living. I am confused as to why, some 20 years […]

Letter of the day

Our Readers
Letter of the day

Dear Editor THE view of some eminent lawyers that the USA’s and Israel’s war against the Islamic Republic of Iran is unlawful relies on a fatal misapprehension of fact. These jurists imagine that there was peace between the parties which ended only a few days ago. In actual fact, the Iranian regime has been at war […]

More evidence links covid jabs to a global surge in excess deaths

Norman Fenton, Martin Neil and Jonathan Engler
More evidence links covid jabs to a global surge in excess deaths

RALPH Lataster of the University of Sydney recently published a paper in the International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine on excess deaths in Australia. He concluded that: ‘Combined with increasing evidence that the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of Covid-19 vaccines have been greatly exaggerated, including acknowledgements from the Australian and American governments that several deaths have been caused […]

The climate scaremongers: Net Zero taxation fuels our soaring energy bills

Paul Homewood
The climate scaremongers: Net Zero taxation fuels our soaring energy bills

THE Government’s claims that energy bills will fall in April by 7 per cent, following publication of the latest energy price cap, are disingenuous to say the least. For a typical house, the new energy cap is £117 pa lower than previously. However, this saving has been achieved only by the sleight of hand of removing […]

Reform, Remigration and the Real Hope Nick Griffin on a Second Show With Nick Buckey MBE

 

Reform, Remigration and the Real Hope by Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin on a Second Show With Nick Buckey MBE

Read on Substack

Recorded few weeks ago, but held back because of Mr Buckley’s involvement in the Gorton and Denton by-election.

Don’t worry, though, our discussion covers the future problems for Reform, why ‘remigration’ is not a viable ballot box solution, and where the real, long-term hope is to be found. And NONE of that has dated in the slightest.

Working on the next (highly practical) piece in the What Is to Be Done series right now. Hope to share that with you tomorrow, so subscribe right now so you get the notification. Hit the button - go on!

Tuesday, 3 March 2026

Foreign Wars and Mass Immigration - Trump and Meloni Mock Their Voters

 

Betrayal - It's What Populists Do

Foreign Wars and Mass Immigration - Trump and Meloni Mock Their Voters

By Nick Griffin

With the first body bags already on their way home, and threats to send even more US personnel into harm’s way, Donald Trump’s betrayal of his most important election pledge is as complete as it is devastating to the millions who once trusted him.

But this is nothing unusual. Promising what voters want to hear, but then delivering what powerful and wealthy vested interests want to happen, is not some shocking aberration - it’s just what populists do. It’s such an established ‘thing’ that, to be blunt, the fault lies not so much with the leaders who lie, as with those who believe their lies in the first place.

The thing to grasp is that Trump is not alone in his deceit and his treachery to his base. While all eyes are on the US President’s despicable but all-too predictable blitz on Iran, one of his favourite European leaders is betraying her core voters with an equally cynical and destructive stab in the back.

The guilty party is Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, and her shocking abandonment of her anti-immigration pledge should serve as a warning to British voters tempted to believe the rhetoric and promises being made by her friend and admirer Nigel Farage.

Meloni, a youthful fascist activist turned ambitious ‘right-wing’ politician, was elected by Italians desperately worried about the growing impact of mass immigration on their country, jobs and security. She played on those fears ruthlessly, talking tough to give voters the impression that she would stop the influx, and even reverse it.

The moment she was elected, however, Meloni turned her coat. She shifted from righteous indignation against the EU’s permissive immigration policies, to becoming a collaborator. Worst of all, even as she made a show of cutting the number of immigrants entering Italy illegally, she opened the floodgates to an unprecedented wave of ‘legal’ immigration.

meloni_immigration

The full scale of Meloni’s betrayal was revealed in a feature article about Meloni in the Daily Telegraph on 2nd March 2026. It is unfortunate that the paper’s blanket paywall policy means that the facts discussed will not become widely known to the British public, because they should give pause for thought for all who believe that some white-knight politician will ride to the rescue and “give us back our country”.

The article opens by looking at the case of two recently arrived Sikhs working on a dairy farm in northern Italy. ‘They are’, explains the article, ‘beneficiaries of a policy quietly introduced by Giorgia Meloni’s government to allow nearly half a million migrants to come legally to Italy over the next three years.’

The reason, according to the Telegraph, is economic. It’s all about the labour shortages which are biting as Italy’s decades of catastrophically low birth rates really start to hit the size and skills of the workforce.

It is this financial reason which makes right-wing politicians like Meloni, Farage, Habib or Lowe so deeply unreliable when it comes to fulfilling any anti-immigration pledges they make in order to get elected. In the end, their big money backers will add to their personal pro-capitalist tendencies to push them to open the doors to more cheap labour.

It’s not even necessary any more, since rapid robotisation and AI are set to replace millions of workers and destroy millions of jobs, but it’s cheaper to import Indians than it is to invest in technology.

Furthermore, new immigrants consume, which is something robots can’t do, so their very presence keeps the capitalist machine rolling, without the inconvenience of having to develop new financial mechanisms to adapt to the technological revolution. Merchant bankers like Farage or Lowe will never challenge the criminal global elite and their fiat money system, but without doing so, mass immigration will remain as much an economic necessity as it is a cultural and genetic disaster.

The exact figure for non-EU labour shortage immigration agreed by Meloni for Italy over the next three years is 497,550. Coverage of this influx tends to obscure the fact that this is not the total number of new residents to be allowed in, but rather the number of work permits, with those who are granted them being allowed to bring in dependents.

Knowing how politicians think and work when they’re stabbing their voters and nations in the back, it is no surprise to learn that the total fresh non-European influx is likely to be somewhere between one and two million. The Telegraph article mentions that one of the two Indians its reporter talked to has his wife and son with him in Italy.

In theory, the work permits only last for nine months, but they are almost automatically extended indefinitely after that, provided that the migrants in question are still in work.

It gets worse. The Telegraph goes on to reveal that the 497,550 (plus dependents) ‘is the second such tranche of legal migrants – the government issued 450,000 permits between 2023 and 2025.’ No wonder that observers say that Meloni is presiding over an Italian ‘Boriswave’.

Work permits for non-EU workers in Italy are issued to the individual applicant, covering their employment or self-employment. Eligible dependents include spouses, minor children, adult dependent children with disabilities, and even, in limited cases, dependent parents. through specific family visa procedures. So much for the ‘tax benefits’ of replacement immigration!

Non-EU workers can apply to take these dependents to Italy at the same time as their own entry or shortly thereafter, via the “accompanying family member” procedure.

The government has reassured the public that this right is tightly restricted but, in reality, all that is needed is proof of relationship (e.g., marriage or birth certificates), sufficient income (typically at least the annual social allowance of around €7,000 plus increments per dependent), suitable housing, and health insurance. All of which those issued work permits will get pretty much automatically.

Naïve enthusiasts for ‘remigration’ like to point to Meloni’s reasonably successful record in cutting the number of illegals entering Italy. In the year 2023-24, for example, the number of sea arrivals was cut by 58%, from 157,650 to 66,441.

That’s a good comparison with the 19% increase seen by Britain, but it still means that Meloni’s “anti-immigration” regime is allowing an influx of combined illegal (by land and air as well as sea) and legal migrants of at least half a million every single year.

farage_meloni

Just remember: This is the work of a ‘far-right’ politician – by origin and reputation well to the ‘right’ of both Farage and Lowe – who was elected on account of her fiery rhetoric about “keeping Italy Italian”. Truly, Trump is not alone in stabbing his loyal followers and voters in the back!

It is as yet too early to be sure how Trump’s reckless leap to war for Israel will pan out in Iran and the broader Middle East. Will Iran crumble under the ruinously expensive onslaught, or is the county’s stock of cheap drones and missiles large and well-hidden enough to exhaust the USA’s stocks of high-priced air defence munitions?

If it’s the former, then the question is what sort of new hellishly unstable shambles the neo-cons’ latest adventure will add to those their past no-win wars have already created. Expect waves more refugees! If it’s the latter, then - if you think Trump’s war is foolish and unpopular now, just wait until American ships and bases start to pay the bill for Israel’s latest blood-soaked party.

All that we will find out in due course. What we already know, however, is that the record of Trump and Meloni absolutely bears out the wisdom and eternal relevance of the Biblical warning “Put not your trust in princes”.

I do not paywall my articles, so if you like them and appreciate my work, please consider helping by becoming a paid subscriber.


A Few Conservative Articles from TWC

 

The nationalisation of children is complete

Dr Tony Rucinski
The nationalisation of children is complete

LAST Wednesday, the Government introduced the Courts and Tribunals Bill. Among other things, it repeals the presumption that children benefit from the involvement of both parents. The presumption, contained in section 1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 since 2014, required courts to assume that a parent’s involvement in a child’s life would further the child’s […]

This government squeeze on private landlords will hurt tenants the most

Gavin S Innes
This government squeeze on private landlords will hurt tenants the most

THE Scottish government’s relentless assault on private landlords shows no signs of slowing. With the Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) holding firm at 8 per cent on additional properties in Scotland and England’s 5 per cent HRAD (Higher Rates for Additional Dwellings), politicians claim these measures tackle speculation and safeguard tenants. The reality is simpler and […]

By ballot and battlefield comes a new era of religious war

John Wycliffe
By ballot and battlefield comes a new era of religious war

GORTON and Denton, the shock that (kind of) wasn’t. Anyone who follows politics could have, and did, predict many of the salient elements of that by-election in advance – the large Muslim block vote, the sectarian division between the ageing and increasingly desperate white working class and a younger, angry but self-confident and rapidly increasing Muslim […]

The Little Ice Age: The climate change event the doom-mongers ignore

Kathy Gyngell
The Little Ice Age: The climate change event the doom-mongers ignore

THERE has been no more powerful propaganda or indoctrination exercise than man-made climate change doom-mongering. It has impoverished and weakened the West, sent nations into economic decline and, even more sickeningly, encouraged people not to have children. The truly terrible thing is that this social and economic death wish is all based on a lie […]

Constructive Nationalism - Back to Real Life Activism

 

“Your community action ideas are all well and good, but what can nationalist organisations do in their own right? Is there a role for revolutionary nationalists during this era of populism, or do we just sit and watch and wait?”

That, in a nutshell, is the gist of the response I’ve had from a number of serious, long-standing nationalist activists to the proposals thus far in my What Is to Be Done? series. Very sensible questions, which deserve and need a serious answer, so here it is:

The rise of the populists pushed nationalist parties off the electoral turf which the mainstream parties’ old conspiracy of silence over immigration and its woes had handed us on a plate. The loss of this space to the populists led to electoral collapse, which resulted in turn in demoralisation, exacerbated internal divisions, a shortage of new recruits and organisational atrophy.

Griffin, Le Pen, Voigt, Fiore - all led parties which were answered, and blocked, by the development of populist safety valves. It is time for a realist, constructive way forward.

With the old electoral road effectively blocked, genuine nationalist parties have tended to suffer from a lack of direction and a resulting lack of realistic ambitions and targets. The shift from real life activities and meetings to online ‘political entertainment’ and generally anonymous chatter has only compounded the problem.

This is good for the key figures in online nationalism; people who are not constantly having to reach into their own pockets for transport, leaflets, papers, election deposits and to fund their organisation’s real-life infrastructure, have disposable income. When just a handful of people buy one of the new breed of ‘nationalist influencers’ a coffee, or pay to ask a question or to get a public ‘thank you’, it’s of no real benefit.

But when thousands of people are chipping in every month, and when all their main platforms are monetised, these people are laughing all the way to the bank. Especially as their overheads and workload are a fraction of what it would cost to run a genuine organisation.

Some of these people are making tens of thousands of pounds a month – and apart from the occasional special appeal there’s nothing being done to which they are expected to contribute accordingly. Instead of ploughing some of their gains back into the Cause, they can upgrade to a new BMW whenever the fancy takes them.

The punters also benefit. They are able to assuage their guilt at their inactivity by ‘doing their bit’ online. Liking and sharing social media posts and videos are much easier and generally safer than walking around the streets wearing rosettes and carrying clipboards and leaflets. It’s particularly attractive to Generation Autism, who are terrified of leaving their bedrooms and having to interact in person with real people.

The online simulacrum of nationalism is thus great for the grifters, the lazy, the cowards and the incels. The only things it’s not good for are the Cause and our people.

The question, then, is what can replace the blocked parliamentary road as the stimulus and to provide goals for genuine IRL nationalist parties and organisations?

They are certainly needed. If the field of ideas is left to the populists, patriotic sentiments and people will be perpetually used and abused by various devious vested interests. Without the analytic powers of ideology, informed criticism and educated idealism, they will be manipulated into fighting the enemies of our enemies, rather than contesting for our own collective interests.

In any case, you can’t be a community leader at the age of 23. Teenagers and young men can protect their community, they can – if they develop real-life skills – do heavy physical work for their community. They can serve, and even entertain, their community. But they cannot lead it. That’s a role for men and women at least a decade older.

Older people will not readily take order from impetuous youngsters, so there’s no point even trying things that involve that. As respecters of the God-given and natural order of things, we must remember that, for the younger generation, political idealism and activism go hand-in-hand with their central role at the heart of the community’s expressions of physical presence and power.

Further, it is absolutely natural for young men to want to change the world, generally by being active with people like themselves. Having children and interacting with other parents eventually broadens their horizons and changes their possible fields of operation. But, in the interim years, political activism is something to which young people will constantly be drawn, and in which those who remain single will tends to stay. Nationalist strategy must therefore be geared to ensuring that this activism has achievable and measurable goals, and is not self-destructive.

It is vital that involvement in movement activism doesn’t restrict options in later life, any further than is unavoidable on account of bigoted totalitarianism of the liberal-left. It is the duty of those leading and advocating for nationalist movements to encourage their followers to avoid own goals – an own goal being something you do voluntarily which tends to cut you off from normal people and to help our opponents to demonise nationalism.

It is also an unfortunate fact that there are a considerable number of us who are sufficiently ‘demonised’ already that our presence in many community action programmes would only be a source of danger and potential division.

This is true not only for those of us already ‘exposed’ as “dangerous far-right extremists”, but also some thousands of mainly younger people who have been sucked into loud-mothed pseudo-nationalist ‘parties’ online.

They may think it was all anonymous but, given the level of infiltration and surveillance of these operations, and the ease with which their data is now harvested, many of these good-hearted but naive enthusiasts will in due course find themselves to be politically ‘toxic’ to normal people.If these people want to play an active role in future, involvement in non-electoral, issues-driven campaigning is likely to be the only outlet available.

There was a time when the primary role of each generation of nationalists was to spread their ideas. For decades, active nationalism was largely confined to passing samizdat pamphlets and rare books from hand to hand, meeting occasionally in the back rooms of smoky pubs, just to waken and educate a few so that they would ‘know the score’ and be able to turn to hand the torch on.

Even only a couple of decades ago, the primary focus of most nationalist movements, even in elections, was to try to give people advance warning of where things were headed, to try to wake people up to the dangers coming down the line.

All that has now changed. Huge numbers of our people are already awake. Those who don’t see, or profess not to see, the problems and threats which surround our people right now probably never will. There are far more people who understand the danger, but believe that “it’s too late, nothing can be done”, than there are those who could still be woken up.

The primary job of revolutionary nations, then, is no longer to “wake people up”, but to find ways to enthuse, organise and empower some of the vast numbers who already are.

This is fortunate, since the growing intolerance of the liberal Powers That Be is overwhelmingly and largely unavoidably focussed on silencing discussion of the problems they have created. Advocating and preparing positive responses, therefore, it not only the wise and constructive thing to do, it is also very much safer.

How, then, is this to be done? The first thing to acknowledge is that, while we can make informed guesses, we really cannot know what the future holds. All we can know for sure is that it will be awash with threats to be met and pregnant with opportunities to be seized.

What do we need to fend off those threats and to grasp those opportunities? Organisation, equipment and skills. Alertness to opportunities and the will to exploit them.

And lots and lots of hard work in real life initiatives. What sort of initiative is exactly what we must explore in the next part of this series but, for now, there’s spring sunshine coming through my window and I’m going out to seize the day.

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support this important and ground-breaking work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thank you!