Search This Blog

Sunday, 9 August 2026

Green Lies and Deceptive Science a Christian & Realistic View Repost and edit

 Ever wonder if we are being played by global elites using junk science to keep us in fear? Look at the Club of Rome, an ultra-wealthy think-tank rubbing shoulders with the UN. They openly admitted to hunting for a common enemy to force humanity to unite, proudly landing on the idea that pollution, global warming, and water shortages would perfectly fit the bill. Even elite academics and politicians have explicitly tipped their hands. Take Stanford Professor 


Steven Schneider, who openly mused that to capture the public's imagination, scientists have to serve up terrifying, oversimplified scenarios while burying their own doubts—forcing each researcher to balance being effective against being honest. Or look at former Canadian Environment Minister Christine Stewart, who flatly stated that even if the science of global warming is entirely phony, it provides the ultimate golden opportunity to completely restructure world power and wealth.

The Real Story: Natural Cycles and Forced Amesia
Why are we acting like a changing climate is a modern invention when the year 1000 AD was demonstrably warmer than today? Legendary atmospheric physicists have proved that the Earth continuously warms and cools in ancient, abrupt, and completely unstoppable cycles driven by changes in the sun. What we are seeing today looks less like objective science and more like classic psychological conditioning. It mirrors the old Soviet mind-control tactics exposed by Edward Hunter, where the language of science and evangelism is hijacked and twisted to make a manufactured narrative palatable. Even the ancient words of Job ask a biting question to arrogant humanity: who is this that darkens counsel with words without knowledge, and where were you when the foundations of the Earth were actually laid?
Look at the hilarious irony of the Copenhagen global warming summit ending with a record-breaking freeze that buried Europe in snow. While global managers scrambled to cover up the explosive Climategate scandal—which exposed their fraudulent data to the world—nature gave us a cold blast of reality. How can we trust leaders who swap their integrity for a conspiracy designed to choke our freedoms? When their grand plans fail publicly, they just retreat behind closed doors to plot their next moves toward global control, helped along by political puppets and UN bureaucrats begging for a little more time to dictate policy.
Erasing the Past to Control the Present
The sheer scale of this deception is jaw-dropping. Did you know a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator manually rewrote climate history, doctored over 5,000 unique articles, and literally erased the Medieval Warm Period online because climate insiders saw it as a massive roadblock to their agenda? They desperately needed to delete the historical records to make their modern charts look terrifying.
They scream about a scientific consensus, yet Al Gore's apocalyptic claims that Greenland's ice will melt and raise oceans by twenty feet are pure science fiction. Actual unadulterated facts show that Greenland’s ice mass and its polar bear populations have actually grown. When Norwegian Vikings settled Greenland a millennium ago, it was genuinely green and perfect for farming, until a natural shift triggered the Little Ice Age and froze them out. Back then, long before anyone could blame SUVs for a warm day, the Atlantic coasts weren't swallowed by rising oceans because nature naturally handles warmer cycles through evaporation.
More than 17,000 real American scientists, meteorologists, and oceanographers have boldly rebelled against this forced consensus, proving that 20th-century carbon dioxide has caused zero deleterious climate effects and has actually accelerated global plant growth. Yet the mainstream media remains completely deaf to rational voices. They treat Al Gore’s eco-philosophy not as science, but as a dogmatic, earth-centred religion demanding our absolute spiritual submission. If this pan-religious global agenda is really about blending ancient pantheism with modern political control, aren't we just trading our hard-won liberties for a totally engineered emergency?  
our relationship to the earth, offering a rich tapestry of ideas that claim all things are interconnected like the blood that unites us all. He even laments that the spiritual sense of our place in nature, which can be traced right back to the dawn of human civilisation, was somehow ruined when organised goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity. To bolster this earth-centred spirituality, he regularly points to ancient Eastern dictums declaring the Earth as our mother and all of us as her children.
To force this eco-spirituality onto the masses, Al Gore demands a central organising principle that everyone must voluntarily agree to. He openly warns that minor shifts in policy or moderate improvements in laws are nothing more than forms of appeasement, designed to trick the public into believing that sacrifice, struggle, and a total, wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary. But how do you get the public to consent to a wrenching transformation? The elite members of the Club of Rome knew the answer perfectly: you need a massive, terrifying crisis. Local environmental issues like a polluted river or industrial waste simply are not scary enough to capture the global imagination. You need a sensationalised, borderless monster like global warming to truly terrify the world into submission.
The Radical Roots of Green Politics
To understand the raw politics and persuasive propaganda driving this movement, you only have to look at the social ambitions that birthed it. The entire green agenda was cooked up during the sixties when four anti-establishment groups merged to form the Green Party in Germany: radical feminists, new-left Marxists, anti-war peacenicks, and hippies chasing spiritual enlightenment. Is it any coincidence that they chose Vladimir Lenin’s actual birthday to celebrate Earth Day?
Militant American greens quickly adopted the exact same playbook, pushing for radical population control, a global welfare system to replace capitalism with socialism, planetary governance with national disarmament, and earth-centered pantheism. The overlap explains exactly why Marxism and earth-worship saturate modern environmentalism. Look at the chilling reality that William Reilly, a former head of the Environmental Protection Agency, openly dismissed private land ownership as a quaint anachronism, while pushing to gut constitutional property protections so the government could seize private land with ease.
The undisputed ringleader of this global circus for the past three decades has been Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong. Operating behind the scenes, Strong has controlled the UN Environmental Programme, directed massive global summits, and co-chaired the World Economic Forum. As a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and a member of the Club of Rome, he oversaw the drafting of the UN Earth Charter—an international contract housed in a literal Ark of Hope. If the public buys into this charter, its sweeping regulations will completely override and replace the rights granted by national constitutions.
The Earth Charter dramatically proclaims that we stand at a critical moment in history where humanity must choose its future through a new sense of global interdependence. It boldly states that fundamental changes are needed in our values, institutions, and ways of living. This global contract completely clashes with traditional values, demanding a total shift in human behaviour to enforce a unified, compliant human family.
Censorship and the Weaponisation of National Security
Achieving this grand global purpose requires more than just doomsday propaganda; it demands absolute censorship to silence anyone who dares to look at the facts. In the UK, environmental fervour has bordered on pure fanaticism. Elite scientific institutions have thrown their massive weight behind unproven global warming theories, ensuring that any scientist skeptical of the narrative is denied academic jobs and completely cut off from university funding. Some radicals have even demanded that denying climate change be made a criminal offence, treating it on par with Holocaust denial. As a result, heavy-handed laws are slipping onto the books, penalising everyday households for crimes against nature.
The rest of the world is following right along. Under the deceptive banner of Sustainable Development or Smart Growth, a massive web of regulatory agencies is quietly implementing a total UN takeover of water, land, food, and housing. They bypass elected lawmakers entirely, but when they do use the legislature, the tactics are terrifying. Proposed bills have attempted to tie climate change directly to national security, forcing the military and intelligence agencies to run war games based on global warming. By framing the weather as a national defence issue, globalist politicians make it almost impossible for anyone to debate or ignore their agenda.
The Crushing Weight of Contrary Evidence
Meanwhile, the actual scientific evidence against man-made global warming is completely overwhelming. Real-world experiments have confirmed that cosmic rays significantly influence the planet's cloud cover. During periods of high electromagnetic activity from the sun, these rays are deflected, clouds decrease, and direct solar radiation naturally warms the Earth. The past, both recent and geological, has seen massive, rapid, and entirely natural shifts in temperature long before industrialisation. Any onset of warmer temperatures is driven by these powerful celestial forces, not human existence.