Search This Blog

Sunday, 4 November 2018

Hillary Emails Reveal NATO Killed Gaddafi to Stop Libyan Creation of Gold-Backed Currency

Hillary Emails Reveal NATO Killed Gaddafi to Stop Libyan Creation of Gold-Backed Currency 

First published on June 13, 2017
Hillary’s emails truly are the gifts that keep on giving. While France led the proponents of the UN Security Council Resolution that would create a no-fly zone in Libya, it claimed that its primary concern was the protection of Libyan civilians (considering the current state of affairs alone, one must rethink the authenticity of this concern). As many “conspiracy theorists” will claim, one of the real reasons to go to Libya was Gaddafi’s planned gold dinar.
One of the 3,000 Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department on New Year’s Eve (where real news is sent to die quietly) has revealed evidence that NATO’s plot to overthrow Gaddafi was fueled by first their desire to quash the gold-backed African currency, and second the Libyan oil reserves.
The email in question was sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by her unofficial adviser Sydney Blumenthal titled “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold”.
The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind: to obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozy’s reputation domestically, assert French military power, and to prevent Gaddafi’s influence in what is considered “Francophone Africa.”
Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency.
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).
(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues: 
     a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
     b. Increase French influence in North Africa, 
     c. Improve his internal political situation in France, 
     d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the     world, 
     e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa)
Second update: see https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/6528  (screenshot below)

Sunday, 10 December 2017

The Greatest Story NEVER Told (1)


"History as it is being written and conveyed today is all too often only a crude mix of untruths, remnants of Allied propaganda from the Second World War, half-truths, tales and myths, cleverly put together for purposes of indoctrinating the brain-dead masses."
- Gautier This channel contains documentaries and media relating to World War II, with a focus on the German Armed Forces and the National Socialist regime in particular. Video content on this channel also includes the politics, ideals, and goals of the leadership who were trying to protect both their nation and way of life. All media and information presented on this channel is intended to educate and encourage discussion involving this chaotic era.

Friday, 17 November 2017

Christmas Adverts: Multicultural Propaganda - Mark Collett



Author and presenter Mark Collett has earned himself an enviable reputation for consistently well-researched articles and podcasts, and his wealth of knowledge of nationalist matters is known throughout the USA as well as in Britain. His output is thoroughly checked by legal experts before being published, but sometimes even if an item is legally sound, it can be removed without prior notice by certain web agencies. And the reasons for this can be obscure. In this popular podcast, Mark outlines some current peculiar trends in Christmas advertisements from many of today's High Street retailers.

Sunday, 9 July 2017

Michael Hoffman - Usury in Christendom .And its threat to the west


Meet the Real Deal: Michael Hoffman on ‘Usury in Christendom’

January 17, 2013

Michael Hoffman is undoubtedly one of the leading thinkers on the Money Power. His analysis of Talmudic, Rabbinical thinking is brilliant. To see him now come out with all guns blazing against Usury is really very good news for all anti-Usury activists out there.

Hoffman does not mince words, is a formidable academic, is keenly aware of both the Jewish aspect of the Money Power and how it destroyed Catholicism and the papacy and does not fear stating God’s case short and simple as it is. In short: he’s our man.

His site is ‘On the Contrary’ at revisionistreview.blogspot.com and his latest book is called ‘Usury in Christendom’ and is a virulent attack against Usury, the Money Power and ‘Christians’ going along. He is forceful, scathing, to the point and incredibly well informed. Below you’ll find a short presentation by him on his latest book, including a transcription of his most vital points.

But I certainly want to highlight this familiar point that Hoffman makes: ‘…freedom from interest on money, is essentially the battle for freedom from the Money Power’. This is the key message. The Money Power rules through control of the money supply and its main tool of domination is Usury.

All the pundits out there that ‘valiantly battle the NWO’, but either ignore or deny this are just fools or worse. This is one of those lithmus tests that immediately show you who know and who don’t.

Since Hoffman, in the video below, doesn’t mind taking a direct shot at Thomas Woods and the von Mises institute, I’ll also add this: exposing Usury and Usurers for what they are in itself is a pleasant task when it comes to people like Bernanke, Rothschild, Trichet and the like. Everybody hates them.

But since the ‘Alternative Media’ is dominated by Libertarians, we have shown discomfort in being associated with them too and this has not always generated the same kind of sympathy as when we play a little with the bankers themselves.

But if you consider the truth as so powerfully put forward by Hoffman in his book, and you compare this to what Gary North has to say about interest and Christians, clearly something big is going on.

Here’s how Gary North summarizes his findings on usury in the Bible in his massive 20 volume ‘Economic Commentary on the Bible’
“I have good news and bad news. It is OK to deposit money in the bank and earn interest. That’s the good news. It is unwise to borrow money to buy anything but investments and to meet emergencies. That is bad news for most Christians.”

So Gary North simply says you can rape your brethren with usury, but you are sinning if you are allowing yourself to be raped.

This is the typical, purely satanic great turn around. Blaming the victim and whitewashing Usurious Usurpation.

It is not important that Thomas Woods is a nice guy. It is not important that Gary North’s ‘grumpy old man’ persona is really funny.

What is important is that these men are consciously lying from highly paid positions, and not only about usury. They are usurers, liars, hypocrites, thieves and enabling murder, just like the idiots of the Mainstream. They are our enemies. And yes, when we aim to serve Christ we must love our enemies. But love comes in two kinds: soft love and tough love. Tough love is when you discipline your child when it is damaging stuff or endangering himself or others. Here’s some tough love by Jesus, when dealing with the Pharisees (Matthew 23):
 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Is it reasonable to quote this in a ‘normal, rational debate about economics’? It is very reasonable. Economics has been hijacked by Money Power agents of many persuasions, and they have turned it into a soulless pseudoscience dealing with scarcity. But it is in fact the simple, yet sacred, science of tapping into God’s abundance by sharing it equitably. And Usury is not part of that plan.

I’m not one to say ‘the Bible is the word of God and that’s the end of it’. The Word is the Logos and the Logos is within us all. Or better: we are all within the Logos. The Logos has different words for the same things in different eras for different people and the 21st century needs its own paradigms describing equitable sharing, just as we no longer are satisfied with Genesis 1 to explain the creation of the Universe.

But the simple truths when it comes to economics are still the same as back then in Jesus’ time, and it’s a sacred science, that’s why the Bible and other holy books talk so much about it. They all condemn Usury as a mortal sin. People, ‘economists’, explaining Usury is grand are heretics keeping people from the path. When they parade as Christians, they must be exposed. Just as when we patiently, yet vehemently, oppose their false ‘theories’ explaining how Usury benefits everybody in the long run.

Conclusion
We’ll have to stick to tough love. People keeping the Kingdom from us by explaining us that theft through Usury is no longer theft are both heretics and pseudo scientists.

I, for one, am relieved to find myself in the camp of such a powerful Christian, philosopher, historian, theologian and economist as Michael Hoffman.

Related:
Debunking Tom Woods’ “Catholic” Austrian economics
What Gary North is not telling you about Interest

Here’s a short presentation by him on his main points:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jT0grvk16NI]

And here are just a few of his points transcribed for those who hate looking at a 33 min video when it can be read in two (although you’d miss his very powerful presentation):

Cicero equated usury with murder.

Usury is interest on money, not ‘excessive interest’, which is the modern Orwellian Newspeak for Usury, but interest on money as it was always defined, until the Money Power got in control and then falsified it.

Interest on money was condemned as a mortal sin. It was put on a level at least as theft and sometimes compared with murder. And this was the consistent opinion of the church for at least the first millennium.

What we’re dealing with here is gradualism. There is no way the Money Power could have come in a truly revolutionary manner, at least until it captured the papacy. Once it captured the papacy, then you began to see the footprints of the revolution…..And then you came at the papacy of Leo X, the first of the Medici popes, and only then did you see this revolutionary gnawing away at Usury laws.

Nowadays you have these so-called ‘Catholic libertarians’ like Thomas Woods who openly say Usury isn’t a sin.

This redefinition of Usury as ‘excessive interest’ is necessary for our modern mentality, which is immersed in money-getting, and in greed, it’s a part of all of our lives, it’s woven into our corrupt society, it’s the root of all evil, and we can’t even conceive of a society that says ‘interest on money’, the breeding of money from money, is a mortal sin that will damn your soul to perdition.

Jesus said in Luke 6:35 to lend freely, expecting nothing in return.

The exception in the Old Testament (on Usury prohibition) is because interest on money is so destructive, so damaging, so predatory, that God said you can use it against His enemies.

If we are deceiving ourselves, it is because we need to deceive ourselves. It’s because our lively-hoods depend on interest on money. Or because we believe greed is a lesser sin than lust.

……when we are conspiring with priests, and preachers and ministers and popes in deluding ourselves into believing that there is some greater evil than the Money Power. If there is a greater evil than the Money Power, than the Bible is lying.

To say that the Money Power is at the very top of the evils that we need to work against basically overwhelms people. They want something else to fight.

Christians would be flabbergasted if there was a whorehouse for them down the street, but if there is a whorehouse called a bank, they are not only not flabbergasted, they are probably working there!

And then they are going in as social justice people who are concerned for the poor they are going to go along and palliate the wounds of those people who have been injured by interest on debt. There is a satanic level of mockery there. It is satanic ridiculing of us. Because Jesus intended that we would be overcomers here, that we would be a light unto the world. Instead we make a mockery of the Gospel by these shortcuts that we take….The inability to have faith in God.

And to proceed as we have proceeded (by allowing Usury) , is to reject Grace, not only do we reject the Law, we also reject Grace. Meanwhile, we’re playing the part of hypocrites, we say ‘we’re Christians, we’re Catholics, we’re the reforms, we’re the evangelicals! Come to us world and learn a new way of being’. A new way of being that is based on Compound Interest???

How many Catholics follow the Von Mises institute? How many Catholics follow Ayn Rand?

We reject the weaponization of the love of money as it is represented by interest on loans of money(!!!!!!)

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

Adolf Hitler's Economic Reform Against the Private central Banksters




Under Hitler, the strategy for recovery was largely the work of his economics minister, Gottfried Feder. The NSDAP leadership looked upon the charging of interest on loans as immoral and by forcing banks to abolish the practice of usury millions were freed from slavery of debt. 


"The world financial monopoly stood aghast. If Germany succeeded  in her plan of economic penetration, other nations might follow per example. The whole world would then exchange goods for goods  in a basis of equality and good fellowship. No one would want to  borrow and the financial pyramid of debt, from the apex of which  almighty Finance ruled the world, would collapse. Humanity would be well fed, but the financiers would lose their power. (Federal Reserve) 

Under Hitler, the strategy for recovery was largely the work of his economics minister, Hjalmar Schacht, a conservative willing to ignore free market liberalism. Schacht told a US journalist he was going to correct the excesses of capitalism and create a more stable economic system. He forbade the sending of money out of Germany. He reduced foreign trade largely to barter agreements and put strict limits on imports – all to keep wealth within the country. Under Schacht, private industry was compelled to reinvest its profits in manufacturing approved by the state. And crucial to Germany's recovery was government spending, much of it on public works, the most visible of which was a new highway system – the autobahn – which the army wanted for more efficient movements within Germany. 

*As in peace, so in war. Humanity must be sacrificed to save a worthless economic system.*

"Once again the peoples were told that if they destroyed the leader of the German nation all would be well with the world. Germany worshiped its leader. Britain trusted its Government. Both peoples believed their leaders would save the world. It was a  tragedy of faith in men. One nation has to fight for a new economic and political system the other to preserve the old ones." 

Source: AMERICAN MANIFEST DESTINY AND THE HOLOCAUSTS, BY CONRAD GRIEB (Liberty Bell, 1978), pp 233-236

Today the bankers reign supreme. The European Union with its commissars in Brussels and its so called “European” Central Bank headquartered in Frankfurt, increasingly resembles the old Soviet Union. However, with the recent ongoing “sovereign” debt crisis and the collapse of the Euro, the plan for a united Europe anchored in perpetual debt enslavement has received a major setback and has indeed started to disintegrate. Not withstanding the inability of Adolf Hitler to permanently liberate Europe, it behooves us to appreciate that what he achieved was not done in vain. It is incumbent on us to learn and understand the fundamentals of usury and to spread that knowledge relentlessly, until our material and spiritual liberties have been restored.

How can a government pay debts? The only way a government can pay debts is by taking the money from the people, in this case, many of whom obviously had nothing to do with events that took place 90 years ago. When a government takes on debt due to the corruption and crimes of those in power, it essentially enslaves the people - the entire nation is forced to pay for the debts and crimes of the corrupt few in power. In a free country, labor is never taxed, because labor is the sole possession of the person that produced it. Debt is used by bankers to enslave the world using counterfeit paper or digital money, which they print or type up out of thin air, yet expect people to work hard and pay back at interest.

Another fraudulent system that bankers use to create money out of nothing is a Ponzi Scheme called Fractional Reserve Banking. This is when banks lend out more money than they actually have, only keeping a fraction in reserve, and then charge everyone interest for it all as if it all actually existed. The reason all the money usually ends up with bankers, whom then in turn bribe politicians and use the media for propaganda, is because they are earning interest off money that never existed. They are counterfeiting and committing fraud.

Support history: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...

"Who Is The End Times Babylon" Preached By Pastor Steven L. Anderson

Streamed live on 2 Jul 2017
http://www.faithfulwordbaptist.org/pa... Preached At Faithful Word Baptist Church, Tempe, Arizona, Sunday Night
Here is the link to make an online donation to Faithful Word Baptist Church:
https://www.truebornsons.com/donate-t...

Sunday, 21 May 2017

Douglas Murray Immigration Will End Great Britain

Theresa May and its cheerleaders in the billionaire-owned press continue their illogical, ignorant and deluded promises

From a Comment in the Guardian

Yet as the government of Theresa May and its cheerleaders in the billionaire-owned press continue their illogical, ignorant and deluded promises and accusations over Brexit, it is time for Europeans to reconsider this idea of the British – or, to be more accurate, of the English.
Agreed. Just when you thought that there's no further depths of stupidity for the UK to sink to, that we've finally reached peak stupid, a whole new vista of stupid yawns open.
The UK inexplicably voted to inflict serious harm on ourselves, and to inflict collateral damage on our closest allies. Now we’re simply amazed that the EU doesn’t just want to roll over and let us do what we want. But…but…we’re Britain! Don’t they know that? Why are they so vindictive? Why are they picking on us?
We choose Theresa May, the most awkward, stilted, charmless politician in recorded history to negotiate on our behalf. She predictably humiliates herself, and the UK, and then we blame the European press for pointing it out. Our own press foams at the mouth, spitting venom every day, but we expect the European press to be impartial. Why?
We disregard all logic and economic expertise, and make a stupid political decision to Brexit. Now we’re astounded that the EU are also prioritising political imperatives over economic ones, by making it difficult for us. Why do we expect completely different standards from the EU than we apply to ourselves?
There seems to be very little awareness in the UK, and definitely not from the government, that we’re the ones doing all this. The EU are just reacting, logically and predictably, to protect their own interests against our senseless, mindless, stupid actions. They’re not doing anything to us. We’re not victims here.
What’s happening now is what was always predicted, by everyone who knows anything about these things: the ridiculous fantasies of the Brexit campaign are coming into contact with reality, like a cruise liner grinding into an iceberg. And the magic beans salesmen who brought us here are busy blaming the EU for the mess they created.