Search This Blog

Saturday, 12 April 2025

MP Highlights Not one person has been convicted for covering up the Rape Gangs

In a Tweet on X, MP Rupert Lowe stated
 "Not one person has been convicted for covering up the rape gangs. In my view, those who knew, and failed to act, are as guilty as the rapists themselves.

We have some idea of the scale of the rape. In certain towns, it was commonplace. In certain communities, it was rife. And yes, they were/are mainly tight-knit Pakistani communities. It is simply not credible to suggest that such industrial rape could occur without other members of said community knowing about it. Thousands and thousands knew, but did nothing. That’s just a fact. Of course this cowardice spreads beyond those groups. Into police forces, social services, the legal system, local politics and more. People, with the authority to act, knew and did nothing. Our inquiry will ask the questions that have been avoided for decades: Who knew what was happening? Who said nothing? Who made the decision to let it carry on? What can be done about it? We will explore, in detail, the policies and legal options available to deal with the complicit. That includes the feasibility of prosecution, the possibility of revoking citizenship, and the grounds for deportation in cases of proven complicity. This isn’t ‘guilt by association’. It is facilitation. It must carry legal consequences."

Friday, 11 April 2025

Why There Will Be No Inquiry Into the Pakistani Rape Gangs

By The Jolly Heretic 

It’s no exaggeration to say that the Pakistani Grooming Scandal is probably the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil at the hands of foreigners since the Harrying of the North in winter 1069 to 1070. In that winter, William the Conqueror brutally subjugated the north of England. Over the last 30 years, a new conquering force has attacked the rebellious northlands: Many thousands of vulnerable, working-class English girls were groomed with alcohol and drugs and then raped by numerous Pakistani men, passed around as though they were sweets.

The Jolly Heretic is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The horrific details – some of the girls were as young as 9, air pumps were used to widen their anuses, baseball bats were inserted into their vaginas, a girl was killed and sold to the community as kebab meat – only underscore the fact that this was a war crime as old as war itself: Men from another tribe invade and take the females as war booty, raping them to humiliate the males of the defeated tribe, to taunt them about their failure to defend their women.

But the metaphor doesn’t work. These men were invited into England by the Labour Party, once the party of the working class, founded in part on the Trade Union Movement and Nonconformist churches that were popular among workers. These horrors took place in overwhelmingly Labour-voting areas – working-class, ex-industrial towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale, with no “white privilege” there – and were covered up, ignored, or downplayed by the authorities, including Labour-voting social workers, partly to protect the Pakistanis and the sacred dogma of “multiculturalism”. Elon Musk finally forced the country to confront what had happened, yet Labour minister Jess Phillips announced this week that there would be no public enquiry into the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil since the eleventh century.

The reason the Labour government doesn’t want an enquiry is obvious. It will reveal, in shameful detail, the extent to which Labour Party members were involved in turning a blind eye to, covering up, and enabling the Pakistani rape gangs. It will place in sharp relief something we all know deep down: the Labour Party despises the white working class. In 2014, Labour Shadow Minister Emily Thornberry tweeted a picture of a council house in Rochester with an English flag hanging from it and a tradesman’s white van parked in front. She didn’t comment, nor did she need to. It was her snobbish way of expressing contempt for the English working class, and it was so obvious that she was forced to resign. Why does the left hate the English working class so much?

Part of the reason is that a divide that once existed on the left has collapsed. Even in the 1980s, Labour parliamentarians included actual working-class people, almost always trade unionists, as well as left-wing middle-class people associated with the Fabian Society. Due in part to the egalitarian policies Labour pushed for after the war, such as free university education and grammar schools, clever working-class children were able to move into the middle class.

Intelligence is about 80% genetic, so this period of social mobility could only be temporary. It produced a series of prime ministers from working- or lower-middle-class backgrounds – Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major – but then we returned to prime ministers who were mostly privately educated or at least from upper-middle-class backgrounds. Since intelligence predicts political participation, the remaining working class essentially stopped being involved in the Labour Party. Moreover, low intelligence is associated with disliking change and being highly instinctive, with instincts including ethnocentrism. Accordingly, the remaining working class, regardless of their social behaviour, were not interested in the joys of diversity, not least because it directly undermined their wages.

So, all that remained were middle-class leftists, non-working-class people who would have us believe they are so kind and motivated by fairness that they want to help the working class. Except they don’t. The working class is a means to an end for such people.

In his book Swearing in English, linguistics scholar Anthony McEnery explores the origins of the middle class. Even in the sixteenth century, their position in society was clear. Deep down, they aspired to be upper class and resented that they were not. They feared falling into the working class and being perceived as part of it.

They dealt with this through virtue- and purity-signalling. They asserted they were more moral than the degenerate working class or the decadent upper class. They were more religious, for example, and thus were the engines of Lollardy and Protestantism. Indeed, every moral panic you can think of – from Puritanism to Black Lives Matter – has ultimately been middle-class people vying for status, trying to seem more moral than others. Which social class, for example, do you think uses the word “fuck” the least?

Within this inherently insecure class, some are more insecure than others. In a right-wing society, they purity-signal to appear more moral than everyone else. In a left-wing one, they virtue-signal. As I explore in my book Woke Eugenics, numerous convergent studies on the psychology of leftists show they are high in mental instability, meaning deep down they hate themselves. They fear others, are socially anxious, and are jealous and resentful. As a result, they are high in Machiavellianism; they want power and see people as merely a means to that end. They are narcissistic, creating a perfect, morally superior false self, and they crave adoration, which virtue-signalling can achieve. They are anti-tradition because they associate tradition with a power they feel they lack and to which they feel entitled. They fear a fair fight, so they vie for status covertly through virtue-signalling. And they identify with groups genetically distant from themselves – another family, class, or race – as this allows them to collaborate with outsiders to gain power over their own in-group, their own class.

A good example is Tony Benn, formerly Anthony Wedgwood-Benn, Viscount Stansgate, who renounced his hereditary peerage. He belonged to a generation in which people like him gained power over their own class by collaborating with the English working class. He was very rich, espoused redistribution, yet left his wealth to his own family. But since competitive virtue-signalling is required, once England began admitting non-white people – who were “marginalised” compared to long-settled white people – it became more virtuous to identify with them than with the white working class. The latter were genetically closer to the self and less easy to romanticise, as most of their intelligent members had by then been absorbed into the middle class.

As such, the working class induced disgust in the left, and insofar as they were conservative, the working class became enemies of narcissistic people who felt inherently entitled to power. The working class had the temerity to question those who felt entitled to be worshipped. Foreigners, of course, would vote for the left because the left would give them other people’s money, and the middle-class left, being congenital traitors, would promote their interests and receive power and narcissistic supply in return. Foreigners would also vote for the left because they are anti-nationalistic, and nationalism is the last thing you want if you’re a foreigner. From this, a new leftism emerged wherein morality was associated with being pro-multiculturalism and, through competitive virtue-signalling, eventually anti-white.

Of course, the left knew their own hypocrisy: the working-class English confronted them with the fact that they don’t really care about the poor or anyone else. These poor people’s lives have worsened due to multiculturalism. The left’s policies – such as turning natural and adaptive ethnocentrism into the worst possible heresy and attacking traditional moral values that condemn promiscuity and pre-marital sex – led to this war crime.

The resulting cognitive dissonance took several forms: dehumanising the victim class as scum, blaming the victims for being promiscuous even though they were under-age, and covering up what happened because their sense of moral superiority stems from being highly pro-multiculturalism. If that’s undermined, so is the justification for their power and their narcissistic supply. It all collapses.

This is why Labour does not want an enquiry into this war crime. They despise the English working class. They’d frankly rather they all just died.


For more based-science analysis of society and politics, become a subscriber at JollyHeretic.com!


Thursday, 10 April 2025

The greatest speech which Enoch Powell ever made in parliament

Enoch Powell was a magnificent parliamentarian, a man who makes the present generation of politicians in Britain look like ignorant pygmies.

Wednesday, 9 April 2025

Christian Nationalist Report April 2025 Long tongue liars!

 

Facing Conscription with Nick Griffin

 

Nick Griffin considers the options for young nationalists facing the threat of conscription to another evil elite war.

Let’s be clear: the decay of American manufacturing didn’t happen by accident


 The heart of America has always beat to the rhythm of hammers on steel, the hum of factories, and the pride of craftsmen shaping raw materials into something enduring. For too long, we’ve surrendered that heartbeat to the hollow clatter of foreign assembly lines. We traded our sovereignty, our dignity, and the well-being of our people for the fleeting convenience of cheaply made trinkets. But now, with tariffs reshaping the economic landscape, we stand at the threshold of a rebirth—a return to the essence of what made this nation unstoppable. This isn’t just about economics; it’s about resurrecting the soul of America.

Let’s be clear: the decay of American manufacturing didn’t happen by accident. It was a slow-motion betrayal. We outsourced our jobs, shuttered our factories, and handed over the keys to our prosperity to nations that don’t share our values or our dreams. My grandfather’s refrigerator, bought when he married my grandmother, still runs today. It wasn’t a fluke. It was built by American hands, forged with American steel, and engineered with the kind of pride that doesn’t cut corners. That fridge is a relic of an era when “Made in America” wasn’t a nostalgic slogan—it was a stamp of excellence. Today, we’re surrounded by disposable goods designed to break, replace, and drain our wallets. This isn’t progress. It’s a surrender.

Tariffs are not punishment. They’re a lifeline. By making it harder for foreign competitors to undercut our industries, we’re forcing a reckoning. Suddenly, it’s no longer cheaper to ship jobs overseas. Suddenly, companies that abandoned our heartland for foreign sweatshops will have no choice but to come home. This is how we rebuild. This is how we stop the bleeding. Critics will whine about “trade wars” or “higher prices,” but what’s the alternative? A nation of consumers, not creators? A people stripped of purpose, staring at screens, ordering plastic junk from faceless corporations overseas? That’s not a future. That’s a death spiral.

American men and women are starving for purpose. We weren’t born to click “Add to Cart” and wait for delivery trucks. We were born to invent, to engineer, to sweat over a weld until it’s perfect. The pioneer spirit that carved railroads across mountains and raised skyscrapers into the sky hasn’t vanished—it’s been suffocated by a culture that tells us building things is someone else’s job. Tariffs are the spark that reignites that fire. When factories reopen, when workshops hum back to life, we won’t just be manufacturing goods. We’ll be restoring dignity. Every job created here, every product stamped “Made in USA,” is a middle finger to the lie that America’s best days are behind her.

This is about more than economics. It’s about identity. For decades, we’ve been force-fed the myth that globalization is inevitable, that competition with countries exploiting their workers and polluting their rivers is “fair.” But since when did Americans settle for “fair” when we could strive for dominance? Our ancestors didn’t cross oceans and plains to become passive observers of their own destiny. They built. They fought. They innovated. Tariffs are the first step in rejecting the cowardice of offshoring and embracing the courage of self-reliance.

The road ahead won’t be easy. There will be short-term costs. But since when did greatness come without sacrifice? The naysayers can keep their flimsy gadgets and their fragile supply chains. We’ll take the struggle of rebuilding, because on the other side of that struggle is a nation that makes things again—things that last. A nation where fathers and mothers point to bridges, engines, and yes, refrigerators, and say, “We built that.” A nation where the American spirit, too long caged by complacency, finally breaks free.

This is our moment. The tariffs are more than policy—they’re a declaration. We are done outsourcing our future. We are done surrendering our pride. Let the world call it protectionism. We’ll call it patriotism. The golden age of American building begins now.

The skeptics love to preach about the “global economy” as if it’s some sacred, unalterable force of nature. But let’s strip away the euphemisms. What they call “globalization” is really just a race to the bottom—a system that rewards countries for exploiting laborers, gutting environmental standards, and hollowing out the industries of their so-called “partners.” America didn’t become a superpower by bowing to such extortion. We became a superpower by outworking, outthinking, and outbuilding everyone else. Tariffs level the playing field, yes, but their greater purpose is to remind the world that America doesn’t follow rules—we set them. This isn’t isolationism; it’s defiance. We’re done playing the sucker in a rigged game.

Consider the small towns and cities scattered across the Rust Belt, the South, and the heartland. These communities weren’t just clusters of factories; they were ecosystems of innovation and pride. When the factories left, they took more than jobs. They took identity. They took the Friday night camaraderie of workers sharing a beer after a hard week, the local diners buzzing with shifts changing, the scholarships funded by plant profits for kids to learn trades. Tariffs won’t just revive factories—they’ll revive the glue that holds these towns together. This isn’t nostalgia. It’s justice. For every Main Street boarded up, for every family fractured by addiction or despair in the wake of economic collapse, tariffs are a down payment on redemption.

And let’s talk about the men and women who’ve been told their skills are obsolete. The welders, machinists, and electricians—the ones who don’t just push buttons but solve problems with calloused hands and sharp minds. These aren’t “old economy” jobs. They’re timeless trades, the backbone of any society that values self-reliance. Tariffs will force us to reinvest in apprenticeships, in vocational schools, in the kind of hands-on education that doesn’t saddle kids with debt but instead gifts them purpose. Imagine a generation raised not on influencers peddling vanity, but on mentors teaching them to measure twice and cut once. That’s how cultures endure. That’s how legacies are forged.

Detractors screech about inflation, but they ignore the hidden costs of our current decay. Yes, a $10 toaster from overseas is cheap—until you factor in the billions spent on welfare for displaced workers, the opioid crisis fueled by joblessness, or the national security risks of relying on China for everything from microchips to antibiotics. What’s more expensive: paying a fair price for a toaster built in Ohio, or surrendering our resilience as a nation? Tariffs force us to confront these truths. They’re not a tax on consumers; they’re an investment in sovereignty. When we build our own goods, control our own supply chains, and employ our own people, we’re not just saving money—we’re saving ourselves.

Some will say automation renders this vision outdated. Nonsense. Automation isn’t the enemy; offshoring is. Imagine combining American ingenuity, robotics, and high-tech manufacturing with the grit of our workforce. We’d dominate. Germany didn’t abandon its factories—it married precision engineering with cutting-edge tech. Japan didn’t outsource its auto industry—it perfected it. America can do both, but only if we have the courage to protect and nurture our industrial base first. Tariffs buy us time to innovate here, on our soil, rather than handing our future to rivals.

This is also a spiritual battle. Consumerism has turned us into a nation of renters—of our gadgets, our homes, even our identities. We scroll, we swipe, we discard. But building things changes you. It roots you. There’s a reason our grandfathers held onto that fridge for 60 years: it was a testament to their values. Durability. Integrity. Legacy. When we build again, we’re not just making products—we’re making prophets of a forgotten creed. Every steel beam, every engine, every circuit board crafted here becomes a sermon: We refuse to rot. We choose to create.

The road ahead demands more than tariffs, of course. We’ll need to slash regulations that strangle small manufacturers, rewrite trade deals that put America first, and celebrate blue-collar work as noble, not “backup” career. But tariffs are the catalyst. They’re the spark in the dark, the signal to the world that America is done outsourcing its soul. For every CEO who claims he “has no choice” but to move jobs overseas, tariffs scream back: You do now.

History doesn’t remember nations for what they bought. It remembers them for what they built. The pyramids. The railroads. The internet. Our ancestors didn’t cling to safe, small, soulless lives—they gambled on greatness. Tariffs are our gamble. They’re a bet that American hands still yearn to shape steel, that American hearts still hunger for purpose, and that this country’s best chapters aren’t behind her, but waiting to be written. Let the doubters cling to their cheap trinkets.

We’re building cathedrals.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King

Click here to view this email as blog post and please share it.

Sunday, 6 April 2025

German MEP Christine Anderson on the hidden forces

 

By Camus
German MEP Christine Anderson recently shared her perspective on the hidden forces shaping global governance. "I don’t know who’s truly behind it," she admitted. "It’s not Ursula von der Leyen—she isn’t making decisions. It’s not Bill Gates, nor even Klaus Schwab. They’re not the ones calling the shots. These are just the public faces, the ones who stick their heads in front of cameras and push this totalitarian nonsense."

Anderson argues that the real power lies with an elusive group she calls, for lack of a better term, "globalitarian misanthropists." "I have no idea who they are," she said, "but they’re the ones pulling the strings. Our elected governments? Mere puppets, implementing whatever these shadowy figures dictate." She believes their ultimate goal is clear: "They want a one-world government, transforming our liberal, open, democratic societies—built on free individuals—into a collectivist system where people are just malleable parts, shoveled around as needed." For Anderson, this agenda explains the very existence of the European Union. "Look at Europe," she continued. "This small continent, with its rich tapestry of cultures, traditions, histories, and languages—its people are proud. You could never convince them outright to abandon their nation-states and sovereignty for a one-world government. They’d resist. So the EU was created as a stepping stone." She pointed to the historical pretext: "They say, ‘Oh, we’ve had so many wars here, we need to unite as Europe to stop it.’ That’s true enough, but it’s a convenient excuse. The EU institutions are steadily absorbing more power, conditioning Europeans to accept the next leap—a full global government." Anderson sees this as a deliberate, gradual erosion of national identity and individual liberty, orchestrated by those she deems "globalitarian misanthropists." "It’s not about peace," she concluded. "It’s about control."

Nick Tenconi Speaks At Two-Tier Policing Protest

UKIP leader Nick Tenconi speaks at Turning Point UK's anti-two-tier policing protest opposite Downing Street. http://ukip.org/join

Saturday, 5 April 2025

USA Government Pressures UK Two Tiers Kiers Tyrannical Government Over online Freedom of Speech

 Dear Gab Supporters,



The battleground has shifted, and the stakes have been raised. Our relentless fight against the UK government's tyrannical Online Safety Act (OSA) has now intersected with crucial international trade negotiations between the United States and the United Kingdom. Thanks to your support our legal team has been able to make in-roads with communications on our behalf to the White House, the DOJ, and other relevant government agencies regarding our battle for free speech against the UK government. Thank you to those who have donated to support these efforts, you played a crucial role in helping us get to this point. 

Reports confirm that the US government is actively pressuring the UK within these trade talks, demanding assurances that the draconian Online Safety Act will not cripple the operations of US-based digital platforms like Gab.

Here's the situation:

  • The US and UK are negotiating a significant trade deal, driven partly by the UK's desire to offset potential new US tariffs.
  • A major sticking point is the UK's Online Safety Act – the very legislation demanding Gab implement censorship or face crippling fines (up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue) and even potential criminal charges against individuals like me!
  • The US, historically protective of its tech companies (often citing principles similar to Section 230 which limits platform liability), is pushing back. They are reportedly seeking provisions in the trade deal that would prevent the UK from holding US platforms liable for user-generated content and imposing other restrictive measures mandated by the OSA.

This development is a direct consequence of the extreme overreach we've been warning you about. The UK's attempt to export its censorship regime and attack American companies is now meeting resistance at the highest levels of international negotiation.

Why This Matters:

  1. Validation: This confirms that the OSA isn't just a threat to Gab; it's recognized by the US government as a significant impediment to international commerce and potentially harmful to fundamental principles like free expression online. The concerns raised by Big Tech companies about privacy (like scanning messages) and over-censorship mirror our own warnings.
  2. Leverage: The UK's desire for a favorable trade deal gives the US leverage. This pressure could force the UK to reconsider or dilute the most harmful aspects of the OSA that target platforms like ours.
  3. The Core Conflict: This highlights the fundamental clash: The UK's authoritarian drive to control online speech versus the American principle (however imperfectly applied by Big Tech) of platform freedom and user expression. Gab stands firmly on the side of free speech.

However, we must remain vigilant. While this US pressure is a positive sign, there's no guarantee the UK will fully back down. They may try to carve out exceptions, find compromises that still harm platforms committed to real free speech, or prioritize their domestic censorship agenda over the trade deal benefits. Furthermore, the US negotiators' primary concern might be protecting large corporations, potentially overlooking platforms like Gab that truly champion free speech principles.

Our fight continues, regardless of these negotiations. We cannot rely on diplomats trading favors. We must continue to build our independent infrastructure, strengthen our legal defenses, and stand firm on our principles. The threat of massive fines and the outrageous possibility of criminal charges against individuals for upholding free speech remain potent weapons in the UK's arsenal.

This situation underscores the critical need for resources to navigate this complex international battle and withstand the ongoing attacks, including the economic warfare targeting our infrastructure providers.

The Fight Intensifies – Support Gab's Stand Against Global Censorship: [DONATE NOW]

(

Europe TUNE in for WAR? Neil Oliver raises CONCERNS over the mood in Eur...

Neil Oliver and Ralph Schoellhammer dig into what’s really going on across Europe — from war funding to political power plays. Are our leaders working for the people, or just chasing profit and control? It’s time to ask the hard questions.

Why we must Write and Record History

 Why we must Write By Letters of Rome 


In our tumultuous world there is the tendency to give up, walk away, and turn our back on trying to make a difference. It is understandable as an easy life was promised to no one; although this modern world deceived us into believing it can. And what does making a difference even mean? The world has forever been a brutal place. I’ve seen no evidence of it being otherwise through the years I have devoted to studying it - not that I’m an expert but I have delved back a few thousand years into the Roman and Greek past. While our clothes are different, human nature has not changed. I doubt it ever will. What is this “difference” we think we can make? I have come to realise that it is not so much a difference as a contribution to how we see the world, and through our eyes whether it can impact another person trying to find their way in it. Our experiences matter. To us, and to others even if we don’t see that occurring. It could take generations to reverberate. We don’t control the timeline, merely contribute to its trajectory, all the while others do the same. So, we must Write to record our experiences. How else will anyone in the future know we have been here? We must record history

Friday, 4 April 2025

Has the Free Speech Union sold Out?

UK Labour Government Continues Assault on GAB Freedom of Speech Social Media Site Update


 Just days after we exposed the UK government's escalating attacks – including their admission of targeting our infrastructure providers in an act of economic terrorism – new developments confirm that our warnings about the dangers of the UK's Online Safety Act are being recognized at the highest levels, while simultaneously revealing the truly draconian nature of their threats.

First, the Vindication: A recent report in The Guardian has revealed that officials from the U.S. State Department directly challenged the UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, regarding the severe threat the Online Safety Act poses to freedom of expression.

According to the report:

-Officials from the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) met with Ofcom in London.

-During this meeting, they explicitly raised concerns about how the Online Safety Act risks infringing free speech.

-A State Department spokesperson confirmed this, stating: "As vice-president Vance has said, we are concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”

This is significant validation of everything Gab has been fighting against. Even elements within the US government recognize the UK Online Safety Act for the threat it is.

Now, the Stark Escalation: While Ofcom downplays the Act, claiming it only targets "illegal content," the reality is far more sinister and extends into unprecedented personal threats. The scope of this law isn't limited; it potentially applies to any user-to-user service accessible in the UK.

And here's the truly chilling part: Buried within this tyrannical legislation is the power for UK authorities to bring criminal charges against named senior managers at companies deemed non-compliant.

Let that sink in. They genuinely believe they have the authority, under this Act, to target individuals – like myself – and potentially send American citizens to PRISON for the supposed crime of refusing to implement the UK's subjective censorship regime on a US-based platform protected by the First Amendment.

This isn't just delusional; it's a stunning display of authoritarian overreach. It's as if they've forgotten we operate in the United States, under US law. This threat to literally imprison executives of foreign companies demonstrates the absolute extremity of their censorship agenda and their disregard for international norms, national sovereignty, and fundamental rights.

What This Means:

Our Fight is Justified & Now Validated: The US State Dept. acknowledges the free speech risks.

Ofcom's Narrative is Disproven: Their actions and the law's text reveal a broader censorship goal, now including threats of imprisonment.

The Stakes are Personal and Existential: This is no longer just about fines or deplatforming; it's about the potential for criminal prosecution of individuals for upholding free speech principles.

Urgent US Action is Imperative: "Expressing concern" is insufficient when faced with threats of economic terrorism and potential imprisonment of US citizens by a foreign government over constitutionally protected speech.

We are leveraging this validation from the State Department, combined with the exposure of these outrageous personal threats, in our ongoing communications with the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, The White House, and other relevant bodies. We demand decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to protect American companies, American citizens, and the foundational principle of free expression from this foreign aggression.

This fight has reached a critical intensity. The UK government is not just attacking a platform; they are threatening individuals with imprisonment for defending your right to speak freely. We must have the resources to fight back on all fronts – legal, technical, and political – against this multi-faceted assault.Defend Free Speech & Stand Against Tyrannical Threats: [DONATE NOW]

(Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. International supporters, due to the ongoing payment processor blockade likely linked to these attacks, please use the Bitcoin option on our donation page for now.)

The masks are off. The UK's agenda involves censorship, economic warfare, and now, the audacious threat of jailing individuals who refuse to comply. We will not be intimidated. Stand with us now, stronger than ever.

Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.

With unwavering resolve,

Andrew Torba and the Gab Team

Christ is King

Thursday, 3 April 2025

David Irving on Winston Churchill’s links to organized Zionism

 

JFK was the Last True American President

 

JFK was the Last American President
 - Israel got nuclear weapons after they killed him - He wanted to splinter the CIA and scatter it into the wind - He wanted to destroy the federal reserve and replace it with silver and gold notes - Executive order 11110 was issued by JFK on June 4th, 1963 - 🧃started immigration with the “Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965” - Increased US AID, now $3B annually - Formed Strategic alliance - Diplomatic support, The US provided Israel with diplomatic support which meant vetoing UN resolutions critical of Israel - Israel increased their military cooperation, including joint military exercises and the sale of advanced military equipment to Israel - Diplomatic immunity: Israel was granted diplomatic immunity by the US, which protected Israeli officials from prosecution in the US - Economic benefits: Israel benefited economically from its relationship with the US, including access to US markets and investment - Increased influence in the US: Israel's influence in the US increased significantly after JFK's assassination, with Israel gaining more control over US foreign policy in the Middle East. - Ability to annex territories: Israel was able to annex territories, including the West Bank and Gaza Strip, without facing significant opposition from the US - Access to US intelligence: Israel gained access to US intelligence, including satellite imagery and signals intelligence, which has aided its military operations In conclusion. Yes Israel killed him. Every single president since then has been a puppet

Wednesday, 2 April 2025

A Massive White Pill on Birth Rates presnted by Nick Griffin

 

Nick Griffin with the stunning news that we are NOT being swamped by "fast-breeding Muslims"

Tuesday, 1 April 2025

The Call for the Great Appeal Act of Parliament Grows

 In a Tweet MP Rupert Lowe has called amongst others for a Great Apeall act. In my opinion to Get rid of all the hideous Laws introduced by the Blair and following Traitorous governments subversive laws disguised as equality legislation. 

Update: UK Government Escalates Attack on Gab Free Speech Social Media

Last week we outlined the UK government's direct assault on Gab and free speech through the tyrannical Online Safety Act. We detailed their demands for censorship and exorbitant fines, which we unequivocally refuse to comply with. Now, the situation has escalated dramatically, confirming our deepest concerns about the lengths these forces will go to silence dissent.

The UK government has openly admitted in recent interviews that their attack extends beyond legal threats against Gab directly. They have publicly stated their intention to actively target Gab's essential infrastructure providers – the very services that keep our platform online – in a malicious attempt to pressure them into deplatforming us. Let's call this what it is: economic terrorism waged by a foreign nation-state against an American company.

This is a calculated, extra-jurisdictional attack aimed not just at censoring speech they dislike, but at destroying a US business and silencing American voices protected by the First Amendment, simply because we refuse to bow to their authoritarian demands.Stand Against Economic Terrorism & Censorship: [DONATE NOW] (Reminder: US supporters can use standard payment methods. Due to the likely related ban by our international processor, overseas supporters can currently only contribute via the Bitcoin option on our donation page. We are working on alternative solutions.)

This isn't just about fines anymore; it's a direct assault on our operational existence. By threatening our hosting partners, payment processors (as we've already seen with our international processor ban), and other crucial service providers, the UK government is attempting to achieve through back-channel coercion what they cannot legally achieve directly: the complete eradication of Gab.

This confirms that the fight we described is not merely about differing legal interpretations; it is a coordinated campaign to cripple platforms that champion free expression. They know Gab stands as a bastion of open discourse, and they are deploying scorched-earth tactics to make an example of us. If they succeed in pressuring infrastructure companies to drop Gab, they establish a terrifying precedent to do the same to any online service, American or otherwise, that doesn't toe their ideological line. Our resolve remains unshaken. We reiterate:

We will NOT comply with UK censorship demands.

We will NOT pay a single cent in fines.

We will fiercely defend our rights as a US company under the First Amendment.

We will continue to provide a platform for free speech for ALL people, including our users in the UK.

This escalation makes the fight more challenging, but it also clarifies the stakes. They are targeting the foundational pillars that allow Gab to function. This requires us to redouble our efforts in building resilient, censorship-resistant infrastructure and mounting an even stronger legal and political defense.

We are continuing to engage with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Justice, and other relevant US authorities to highlight this unacceptable foreign interference and economic aggression against a US entity. We repeat our call for decisive action from the US government, including President Trump's proposed tariffs, to counter this blatant attack. Now, more than ever, we need your support. This fight against state-sponsored economic warfare requires significant resources.

Your contributions directly fund:

Securing and diversifying our technical infrastructure against these targeted attacks.

Aggressive legal defenses against unlawful pressure campaigns.

Ensuring Gab remains operational as a sanctuary for free speech.

This is no longer just a warning shot; the UK government has declared open economic warfare. They believe they can bully and bankrupt us into submission by attacking our partners. We must prove them wrong. Stand with us today to defend not only Gab but the fundamental right to speak freely online without fear of state-sponsored economic destruction. Thank you for your unwavering courage and support. We will hold the line. Stay vigilant, stay vocal, stay free.

With unwavering resolve,

Andrew Torba and the Gab Team
Christ is King

Click Here To Donate And Support Gab