Maverick MP Rupert Lowe Has challenged the failing NHS and the cowardly politicians who are afraid of tackling the subject . Today in a Tweet on X Mr Lowe MP stated the following .
Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Search This Blog
FREEDOM NEWS HOME PAGE
Sunday, 13 April 2025
America is addicted to the moment
America is addicted to the moment. We swipe credit cards for dopamine hits, chase trends that vanish overnight, and measure our lives in viral clips and fleeting “experiences.” We’ve traded the dignity of patience for the chaos of now, mortgaging tomorrow to feed the hunger of today. This isn’t just a financial crisis—it’s a spiritual famine. We’ve forgotten how to plant seeds that take decades to grow, to build altars for children we’ll never meet, to live as if our choices ripple into eternity. The cult of instant gratification has gutted our vision. We scroll, we spend, we sprint—and we’re left with empty wallets, hollow relationships, and a nation gasping for air. But there’s a way out. The Bible, ancient and unflinching, calls us to rebel against this tyranny of the temporary. It thunders with a truth we’ve buried: We were made for more than this.
Related: Click Here to Listen To My New Podcast Episode on The New Social Contract, a chapter from my book Reclaiming Reality.
Our ancestors built cathedrals over centuries. They crossed oceans to carve out futures they wouldn’t live to see. Who is doing things like this today? Debt strangles half the country because we’d rather feel rich today than be free tomorrow. Marriages collapse when the grind gets hard. Politicians sell quick fixes because we’ve lost the stomach for sacrifice. We’ve become a people allergic to the weight of legacy, chasing the shadow of “YOLO” (You Only Live Once) while the substance of life evaporates. This isn’t freedom—it’s a slow-motion suicide of the soul. We need to recover the lost discipline of delayed glory, the holy defiance of living for what outlasts us.
The older generation, raised in an era of unprecedented prosperity, now clings to its wealth with a quiet ruthlessness. Having benefited from affordable education, booming job markets, and pensions that no longer exist, many have chosen to spend their golden years hoarding resources rather than stewarding them. They’ll drop $80k on a luxury RV to tour national parks but balk at helping their children with a down payment on a first home. They’ll lecture about “financial responsibility” while leveraging reverse mortgages to siphon equity from family homes, leaving nothing but debt for heirs. This isn’t frugality—it’s a betrayal of the very intergenerational compact that built their comfort. By refusing to pass on tangible blessings—whether wealth, wisdom, or a stable nation—they’ve pulled the ladder up behind them, then blamed younger generations for not climbing faster.
Yet the younger generations, drowning in student debt and gig-economy precarity, have responded with a dangerous fatalism. “If the system’s rigged, why play the game?” They’ll drop $8 on artisanal coffee daily but shrug at saving for retirement, joking, “I’ll just work until I die.” They’ll chase bucket-list experiences and “self-care” splurges while ignoring the storm clouds of entitlement-program insolvency and their own personal pile of debt. Social media fuels this, turning life into a highlight reel of curated moments—while 401(k)s gather dust and credit card balances balloon. This isn’t living “in the moment”; it’s a surrender to despair disguised as liberation. When the future feels like a collapsing tunnel, hedonism becomes the anesthesia.
Together, these postures form a doom loop. The older generation, fixated on self-preservation, drain reservoirs of generational wealth that took lifetimes to build. Meanwhile, younger adults, convinced there’s no reservoir left to fill, puncture the pipes altogether. Families fracture over inheritances; communities starve for long-term investment; politicians kick fiscal time bombs down the road. The result? A society with no one planting orchards—just two generations arguing over who gets the last ripe apple. Fixing this demands a moral revolution: the older generation must recover the lost art of legacy, viewing wealth as a bridge, not a bunker. The young must reject the lie that foresight is futile, trading cynicism for gritty, stubborn hope. Without both, we’ll keep racing toward the cliff all wondering who killed the horizon.
The Bible is a manifesto of radical long-term vision. Joseph didn’t hoard grain for a week—he stockpiled it for seven years to save nations from starvation. Abraham followed God into the unknown, trusting a promise that would unfold over millennia. Jesus spoke of vineyards and vineyards and fig trees, of investments that compound across generations. Scripture doesn’t whisper about patience—it roars. It dares us to see time as God’s gift, not our enemy. Every parable of sowing and reaping, every prophet who stood alone for truth, every martyr who chose death over compromise shouts this: There is sacred power in what grows slowly. The Kingdom isn’t built by the hurried, but by the steadfast—those who dig wells in deserts they’ll never drink from, who plant oaks in storms they’ll never take shade under.
Consider Noah, hammering a monstrous ark for a flood no one believed would come. Imagine the jeers, the mockery, the relentless pressure to quit. He labored for a century, a laughingstock to neighbors who drowned clutching their distractions. Or the prophet Daniel, who refused to bend to Babylon’s culture of compromise, praying toward Jerusalem three times a day as an old man, his faithfulness still shaping nations centuries later. These weren’t optimists—they were obstinate, God-drunk realists who bet their lives on a Story bigger than their lifespan.
Even Jesus modeled this. He spent thirty years in obscurity—a carpenter, not a celebrity—before three years of ministry that changed everything. He healed beggars who’d die again, fed crowds who’d betray Him, and poured His life into twelve men who fled at the first sign of real danger. Why? Because He saw the harvest: billions yet unborn, grafted into His Kingdom through those shaky, stumbling disciples. He traded immediate relevance for eternal impact.
This is our charge: Stop living like an expiration date stamps your forehead. You are eternal. Your choices echo. That dollar you blew on trash? It could’ve paid down your debt. That hour you lost to mindless noise? It could’ve prayed down revival on your grandchildren. The church isn’t a buffet for your comfort—it’s an army training for a war that outlives us all. Imagine families saving to uplift their unborn great-grandchildren. Imagine businesses that prioritize pensions over profit margins. Imagine politicians passing laws that won’t win votes but will save cities. This is the path. Fight for it.
But how? Start by smashing the idols of now. Replace “What’s in it for me?” with “What’s in it for them?”—the “them” being the faces you’ll never see this side of Heaven. Train your children to view money as a seed, not a snack. Teach them to tithe not just from their allowance, but from their inheritance. Fight for a marriage that models grit, not just romance, so your great-grandkids inherit a blueprint for covenant, not chaos. Build a business that funds your family long after you’re gone.
And when the grind feels futile—when the savings account grows too slow, the prodigal child still strays, or the culture keeps spinning madder—remember the martyrs. They died singing, their blood watering fields of faith we now walk in. Their sacrifice wasn’t for applause but for a reward they’d only claim in eternity. This is the muscle memory we’ve lost: suffering with purpose, waiting with expectation, laboring with joy for a timeline we won’t control.
The world will call you a fool. Let them. Let them chase their shadows while you build altars. Let them binge their distractions while you kneel in intercession for generations unborn. Let them sell their souls for relevance while you etch truth into the walls of eternity. You are not here to be remembered. You are here to be faithful.
The fire of eternity burns in your bones. Don’t let the trivial consume you. Live like you’ll live forever.
Because you will.
Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King
Saturday, 12 April 2025
Meet The judge who recently denied a request to release transcripts from a key grooming gang trial
Meet Justice Jonathan Rose.
MP Raises Migrant Harassment of British Women
In A recent Tweeton X MP Rupert Lowe Stated the following
" Why are women feeling increasingly unsafe on our streets? A question all MPs know the answer to, but barely any will admit. Well, let’s be honest.
Vicar DESTROYS Historian David Starkey's Criticisms of Christianity
MP Highlights Not one person has been convicted for covering up the Rape Gangs
"Not one person has been convicted for covering up the rape gangs. In my view, those who knew, and failed to act, are as guilty as the rapists themselves. We have some idea of the scale of the rape. In certain towns, it was commonplace. In certain communities, it was rife. And yes, they were/are mainly tight-knit Pakistani communities. It is simply not credible to suggest that such industrial rape could occur without other members of said community knowing about it. Thousands and thousands knew, but did nothing. That’s just a fact. Of course this cowardice spreads beyond those groups. Into police forces, social services, the legal system, local politics and more. People, with the authority to act, knew and did nothing. Our inquiry will ask the questions that have been avoided for decades: Who knew what was happening? Who said nothing? Who made the decision to let it carry on? What can be done about it? We will explore, in detail, the policies and legal options available to deal with the complicit. That includes the feasibility of prosecution, the possibility of revoking citizenship, and the grounds for deportation in cases of proven complicity. This isn’t ‘guilt by association’. It is facilitation. It must carry legal consequences."
Friday, 11 April 2025
Why There Will Be No Inquiry Into the Pakistani Rape Gangs
By The Jolly Heretic It’s no exaggeration to say that the Pakistani Grooming Scandal is probably the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil at the hands of foreigners since the Harrying of the North in winter 1069 to 1070. In that winter, William the Conqueror brutally subjugated the north of England. Over the last 30 years, a new conquering force has attacked the rebellious northlands: Many thousands of vulnerable, working-class English girls were groomed with alcohol and drugs and then raped by numerous Pakistani men, passed around as though they were sweets. The Jolly Heretic is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. The horrific details – some of the girls were as young as 9, air pumps were used to widen their anuses, baseball bats were inserted into their vaginas, a girl was killed and sold to the community as kebab meat – only underscore the fact that this was a war crime as old as war itself: Men from another tribe invade and take the females as war booty, raping them to humiliate the males of the defeated tribe, to taunt them about their failure to defend their women. But the metaphor doesn’t work. These men were invited into England by the Labour Party, once the party of the working class, founded in part on the Trade Union Movement and Nonconformist churches that were popular among workers. These horrors took place in overwhelmingly Labour-voting areas – working-class, ex-industrial towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale, with no “white privilege” there – and were covered up, ignored, or downplayed by the authorities, including Labour-voting social workers, partly to protect the Pakistanis and the sacred dogma of “multiculturalism”. Elon Musk finally forced the country to confront what had happened, yet Labour minister Jess Phillips announced this week that there would be no public enquiry into the worst crime committed against the English people on their own soil since the eleventh century. The reason the Labour government doesn’t want an enquiry is obvious. It will reveal, in shameful detail, the extent to which Labour Party members were involved in turning a blind eye to, covering up, and enabling the Pakistani rape gangs. It will place in sharp relief something we all know deep down: the Labour Party despises the white working class. In 2014, Labour Shadow Minister Emily Thornberry tweeted a picture of a council house in Rochester with an English flag hanging from it and a tradesman’s white van parked in front. She didn’t comment, nor did she need to. It was her snobbish way of expressing contempt for the English working class, and it was so obvious that she was forced to resign. Why does the left hate the English working class so much? Part of the reason is that a divide that once existed on the left has collapsed. Even in the 1980s, Labour parliamentarians included actual working-class people, almost always trade unionists, as well as left-wing middle-class people associated with the Fabian Society. Due in part to the egalitarian policies Labour pushed for after the war, such as free university education and grammar schools, clever working-class children were able to move into the middle class. Intelligence is about 80% genetic, so this period of social mobility could only be temporary. It produced a series of prime ministers from working- or lower-middle-class backgrounds – Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major – but then we returned to prime ministers who were mostly privately educated or at least from upper-middle-class backgrounds. Since intelligence predicts political participation, the remaining working class essentially stopped being involved in the Labour Party. Moreover, low intelligence is associated with disliking change and being highly instinctive, with instincts including ethnocentrism. Accordingly, the remaining working class, regardless of their social behaviour, were not interested in the joys of diversity, not least because it directly undermined their wages. So, all that remained were middle-class leftists, non-working-class people who would have us believe they are so kind and motivated by fairness that they want to help the working class. Except they don’t. The working class is a means to an end for such people. In his book Swearing in English, linguistics scholar Anthony McEnery explores the origins of the middle class. Even in the sixteenth century, their position in society was clear. Deep down, they aspired to be upper class and resented that they were not. They feared falling into the working class and being perceived as part of it. They dealt with this through virtue- and purity-signalling. They asserted they were more moral than the degenerate working class or the decadent upper class. They were more religious, for example, and thus were the engines of Lollardy and Protestantism. Indeed, every moral panic you can think of – from Puritanism to Black Lives Matter – has ultimately been middle-class people vying for status, trying to seem more moral than others. Which social class, for example, do you think uses the word “fuck” the least? Within this inherently insecure class, some are more insecure than others. In a right-wing society, they purity-signal to appear more moral than everyone else. In a left-wing one, they virtue-signal. As I explore in my book Woke Eugenics, numerous convergent studies on the psychology of leftists show they are high in mental instability, meaning deep down they hate themselves. They fear others, are socially anxious, and are jealous and resentful. As a result, they are high in Machiavellianism; they want power and see people as merely a means to that end. They are narcissistic, creating a perfect, morally superior false self, and they crave adoration, which virtue-signalling can achieve. They are anti-tradition because they associate tradition with a power they feel they lack and to which they feel entitled. They fear a fair fight, so they vie for status covertly through virtue-signalling. And they identify with groups genetically distant from themselves – another family, class, or race – as this allows them to collaborate with outsiders to gain power over their own in-group, their own class. A good example is Tony Benn, formerly Anthony Wedgwood-Benn, Viscount Stansgate, who renounced his hereditary peerage. He belonged to a generation in which people like him gained power over their own class by collaborating with the English working class. He was very rich, espoused redistribution, yet left his wealth to his own family. But since competitive virtue-signalling is required, once England began admitting non-white people – who were “marginalised” compared to long-settled white people – it became more virtuous to identify with them than with the white working class. The latter were genetically closer to the self and less easy to romanticise, as most of their intelligent members had by then been absorbed into the middle class. As such, the working class induced disgust in the left, and insofar as they were conservative, the working class became enemies of narcissistic people who felt inherently entitled to power. The working class had the temerity to question those who felt entitled to be worshipped. Foreigners, of course, would vote for the left because the left would give them other people’s money, and the middle-class left, being congenital traitors, would promote their interests and receive power and narcissistic supply in return. Foreigners would also vote for the left because they are anti-nationalistic, and nationalism is the last thing you want if you’re a foreigner. From this, a new leftism emerged wherein morality was associated with being pro-multiculturalism and, through competitive virtue-signalling, eventually anti-white. Of course, the left knew their own hypocrisy: the working-class English confronted them with the fact that they don’t really care about the poor or anyone else. These poor people’s lives have worsened due to multiculturalism. The left’s policies – such as turning natural and adaptive ethnocentrism into the worst possible heresy and attacking traditional moral values that condemn promiscuity and pre-marital sex – led to this war crime. The resulting cognitive dissonance took several forms: dehumanising the victim class as scum, blaming the victims for being promiscuous even though they were under-age, and covering up what happened because their sense of moral superiority stems from being highly pro-multiculturalism. If that’s undermined, so is the justification for their power and their narcissistic supply. It all collapses. This is why Labour does not want an enquiry into this war crime. They despise the English working class. They’d frankly rather they all just died. For more based-science analysis of society and politics, become a subscriber at JollyHeretic.com! |
Thursday, 10 April 2025
The greatest speech which Enoch Powell ever made in parliament
Wednesday, 9 April 2025
Facing Conscription with Nick Griffin
Let’s be clear: the decay of American manufacturing didn’t happen by accident
The heart of America has always beat to the rhythm of hammers on steel, the hum of factories, and the pride of craftsmen shaping raw materials into something enduring. For too long, we’ve surrendered that heartbeat to the hollow clatter of foreign assembly lines. We traded our sovereignty, our dignity, and the well-being of our people for the fleeting convenience of cheaply made trinkets. But now, with tariffs reshaping the economic landscape, we stand at the threshold of a rebirth—a return to the essence of what made this nation unstoppable. This isn’t just about economics; it’s about resurrecting the soul of America.
Let’s be clear: the decay of American manufacturing didn’t happen by accident. It was a slow-motion betrayal. We outsourced our jobs, shuttered our factories, and handed over the keys to our prosperity to nations that don’t share our values or our dreams. My grandfather’s refrigerator, bought when he married my grandmother, still runs today. It wasn’t a fluke. It was built by American hands, forged with American steel, and engineered with the kind of pride that doesn’t cut corners. That fridge is a relic of an era when “Made in America” wasn’t a nostalgic slogan—it was a stamp of excellence. Today, we’re surrounded by disposable goods designed to break, replace, and drain our wallets. This isn’t progress. It’s a surrender.
Tariffs are not punishment. They’re a lifeline. By making it harder for foreign competitors to undercut our industries, we’re forcing a reckoning. Suddenly, it’s no longer cheaper to ship jobs overseas. Suddenly, companies that abandoned our heartland for foreign sweatshops will have no choice but to come home. This is how we rebuild. This is how we stop the bleeding. Critics will whine about “trade wars” or “higher prices,” but what’s the alternative? A nation of consumers, not creators? A people stripped of purpose, staring at screens, ordering plastic junk from faceless corporations overseas? That’s not a future. That’s a death spiral.
American men and women are starving for purpose. We weren’t born to click “Add to Cart” and wait for delivery trucks. We were born to invent, to engineer, to sweat over a weld until it’s perfect. The pioneer spirit that carved railroads across mountains and raised skyscrapers into the sky hasn’t vanished—it’s been suffocated by a culture that tells us building things is someone else’s job. Tariffs are the spark that reignites that fire. When factories reopen, when workshops hum back to life, we won’t just be manufacturing goods. We’ll be restoring dignity. Every job created here, every product stamped “Made in USA,” is a middle finger to the lie that America’s best days are behind her.
This is about more than economics. It’s about identity. For decades, we’ve been force-fed the myth that globalization is inevitable, that competition with countries exploiting their workers and polluting their rivers is “fair.” But since when did Americans settle for “fair” when we could strive for dominance? Our ancestors didn’t cross oceans and plains to become passive observers of their own destiny. They built. They fought. They innovated. Tariffs are the first step in rejecting the cowardice of offshoring and embracing the courage of self-reliance.
The road ahead won’t be easy. There will be short-term costs. But since when did greatness come without sacrifice? The naysayers can keep their flimsy gadgets and their fragile supply chains. We’ll take the struggle of rebuilding, because on the other side of that struggle is a nation that makes things again—things that last. A nation where fathers and mothers point to bridges, engines, and yes, refrigerators, and say, “We built that.” A nation where the American spirit, too long caged by complacency, finally breaks free.
This is our moment. The tariffs are more than policy—they’re a declaration. We are done outsourcing our future. We are done surrendering our pride. Let the world call it protectionism. We’ll call it patriotism. The golden age of American building begins now.
The skeptics love to preach about the “global economy” as if it’s some sacred, unalterable force of nature. But let’s strip away the euphemisms. What they call “globalization” is really just a race to the bottom—a system that rewards countries for exploiting laborers, gutting environmental standards, and hollowing out the industries of their so-called “partners.” America didn’t become a superpower by bowing to such extortion. We became a superpower by outworking, outthinking, and outbuilding everyone else. Tariffs level the playing field, yes, but their greater purpose is to remind the world that America doesn’t follow rules—we set them. This isn’t isolationism; it’s defiance. We’re done playing the sucker in a rigged game.
Consider the small towns and cities scattered across the Rust Belt, the South, and the heartland. These communities weren’t just clusters of factories; they were ecosystems of innovation and pride. When the factories left, they took more than jobs. They took identity. They took the Friday night camaraderie of workers sharing a beer after a hard week, the local diners buzzing with shifts changing, the scholarships funded by plant profits for kids to learn trades. Tariffs won’t just revive factories—they’ll revive the glue that holds these towns together. This isn’t nostalgia. It’s justice. For every Main Street boarded up, for every family fractured by addiction or despair in the wake of economic collapse, tariffs are a down payment on redemption.
And let’s talk about the men and women who’ve been told their skills are obsolete. The welders, machinists, and electricians—the ones who don’t just push buttons but solve problems with calloused hands and sharp minds. These aren’t “old economy” jobs. They’re timeless trades, the backbone of any society that values self-reliance. Tariffs will force us to reinvest in apprenticeships, in vocational schools, in the kind of hands-on education that doesn’t saddle kids with debt but instead gifts them purpose. Imagine a generation raised not on influencers peddling vanity, but on mentors teaching them to measure twice and cut once. That’s how cultures endure. That’s how legacies are forged.
Detractors screech about inflation, but they ignore the hidden costs of our current decay. Yes, a $10 toaster from overseas is cheap—until you factor in the billions spent on welfare for displaced workers, the opioid crisis fueled by joblessness, or the national security risks of relying on China for everything from microchips to antibiotics. What’s more expensive: paying a fair price for a toaster built in Ohio, or surrendering our resilience as a nation? Tariffs force us to confront these truths. They’re not a tax on consumers; they’re an investment in sovereignty. When we build our own goods, control our own supply chains, and employ our own people, we’re not just saving money—we’re saving ourselves.
Some will say automation renders this vision outdated. Nonsense. Automation isn’t the enemy; offshoring is. Imagine combining American ingenuity, robotics, and high-tech manufacturing with the grit of our workforce. We’d dominate. Germany didn’t abandon its factories—it married precision engineering with cutting-edge tech. Japan didn’t outsource its auto industry—it perfected it. America can do both, but only if we have the courage to protect and nurture our industrial base first. Tariffs buy us time to innovate here, on our soil, rather than handing our future to rivals.
This is also a spiritual battle. Consumerism has turned us into a nation of renters—of our gadgets, our homes, even our identities. We scroll, we swipe, we discard. But building things changes you. It roots you. There’s a reason our grandfathers held onto that fridge for 60 years: it was a testament to their values. Durability. Integrity. Legacy. When we build again, we’re not just making products—we’re making prophets of a forgotten creed. Every steel beam, every engine, every circuit board crafted here becomes a sermon: We refuse to rot. We choose to create.
The road ahead demands more than tariffs, of course. We’ll need to slash regulations that strangle small manufacturers, rewrite trade deals that put America first, and celebrate blue-collar work as noble, not “backup” career. But tariffs are the catalyst. They’re the spark in the dark, the signal to the world that America is done outsourcing its soul. For every CEO who claims he “has no choice” but to move jobs overseas, tariffs scream back: You do now.
History doesn’t remember nations for what they bought. It remembers them for what they built. The pyramids. The railroads. The internet. Our ancestors didn’t cling to safe, small, soulless lives—they gambled on greatness. Tariffs are our gamble. They’re a bet that American hands still yearn to shape steel, that American hearts still hunger for purpose, and that this country’s best chapters aren’t behind her, but waiting to be written. Let the doubters cling to their cheap trinkets.
We’re building cathedrals.
Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King
Click here to view this email as blog post and please share it.
Sunday, 6 April 2025
German MEP Christine Anderson on the hidden forces
By Camus
German MEP Christine Anderson recently shared her perspective on the hidden forces shaping global governance. "I don’t know who’s truly behind it," she admitted. "It’s not Ursula von der Leyen—she isn’t making decisions. It’s not Bill Gates, nor even Klaus Schwab. They’re not the ones calling the shots. These are just the public faces, the ones who stick their heads in front of cameras and push this totalitarian nonsense." Anderson argues that the real power lies with an elusive group she calls, for lack of a better term, "globalitarian misanthropists." "I have no idea who they are," she said, "but they’re the ones pulling the strings. Our elected governments? Mere puppets, implementing whatever these shadowy figures dictate." She believes their ultimate goal is clear: "They want a one-world government, transforming our liberal, open, democratic societies—built on free individuals—into a collectivist system where people are just malleable parts, shoveled around as needed." For Anderson, this agenda explains the very existence of the European Union. "Look at Europe," she continued. "This small continent, with its rich tapestry of cultures, traditions, histories, and languages—its people are proud. You could never convince them outright to abandon their nation-states and sovereignty for a one-world government. They’d resist. So the EU was created as a stepping stone." She pointed to the historical pretext: "They say, ‘Oh, we’ve had so many wars here, we need to unite as Europe to stop it.’ That’s true enough, but it’s a convenient excuse. The EU institutions are steadily absorbing more power, conditioning Europeans to accept the next leap—a full global government." Anderson sees this as a deliberate, gradual erosion of national identity and individual liberty, orchestrated by those she deems "globalitarian misanthropists." "It’s not about peace," she concluded. "It’s about control."
German MEP Christine Anderson recently shared her perspective on the hidden forces shaping global governance. "I don’t know who’s truly behind it," she admitted. "It’s not Ursula von der Leyen—she isn’t making decisions. It’s not Bill Gates, nor even Klaus Schwab. They’re not the… pic.twitter.com/9DISYSqkhY
— Camus (@newstart_2024) April 6, 2025
Nick Tenconi Speaks At Two-Tier Policing Protest
Saturday, 5 April 2025
USA Government Pressures UK Two Tiers Kiers Tyrannical Government Over online Freedom of Speech
Dear Gab Supporters,
The battleground has shifted, and the stakes have been raised. Our relentless fight against the UK government's tyrannical Online Safety Act (OSA) has now intersected with crucial international trade negotiations between the United States and the United Kingdom. Thanks to your support our legal team has been able to make in-roads with communications on our behalf to the White House, the DOJ, and other relevant government agencies regarding our battle for free speech against the UK government. Thank you to those who have donated to support these efforts, you played a crucial role in helping us get to this point.
Reports confirm that the US government is actively pressuring the UK within these trade talks, demanding assurances that the draconian Online Safety Act will not cripple the operations of US-based digital platforms like Gab.
Here's the situation:
- The US and UK are negotiating a significant trade deal, driven partly by the UK's desire to offset potential new US tariffs.
- A major sticking point is the UK's Online Safety Act – the very legislation demanding Gab implement censorship or face crippling fines (up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue) and even potential criminal charges against individuals like me!
- The US, historically protective of its tech companies (often citing principles similar to Section 230 which limits platform liability), is pushing back. They are reportedly seeking provisions in the trade deal that would prevent the UK from holding US platforms liable for user-generated content and imposing other restrictive measures mandated by the OSA.
This development is a direct consequence of the extreme overreach we've been warning you about. The UK's attempt to export its censorship regime and attack American companies is now meeting resistance at the highest levels of international negotiation.
Why This Matters:
- Validation: This confirms that the OSA isn't just a threat to Gab; it's recognized by the US government as a significant impediment to international commerce and potentially harmful to fundamental principles like free expression online. The concerns raised by Big Tech companies about privacy (like scanning messages) and over-censorship mirror our own warnings.
- Leverage: The UK's desire for a favorable trade deal gives the US leverage. This pressure could force the UK to reconsider or dilute the most harmful aspects of the OSA that target platforms like ours.
- The Core Conflict: This highlights the fundamental clash: The UK's authoritarian drive to control online speech versus the American principle (however imperfectly applied by Big Tech) of platform freedom and user expression. Gab stands firmly on the side of free speech.
However, we must remain vigilant. While this US pressure is a positive sign, there's no guarantee the UK will fully back down. They may try to carve out exceptions, find compromises that still harm platforms committed to real free speech, or prioritize their domestic censorship agenda over the trade deal benefits. Furthermore, the US negotiators' primary concern might be protecting large corporations, potentially overlooking platforms like Gab that truly champion free speech principles.
Our fight continues, regardless of these negotiations. We cannot rely on diplomats trading favors. We must continue to build our independent infrastructure, strengthen our legal defenses, and stand firm on our principles. The threat of massive fines and the outrageous possibility of criminal charges against individuals for upholding free speech remain potent weapons in the UK's arsenal.
This situation underscores the critical need for resources to navigate this complex international battle and withstand the ongoing attacks, including the economic warfare targeting our infrastructure providers.
The Fight Intensifies – Support Gab's Stand Against Global Censorship: [DONATE NOW]
(
Europe TUNE in for WAR? Neil Oliver raises CONCERNS over the mood in Eur...
Why we must Write and Record History
Why we must Write By Letters of Rome
In our tumultuous world there is the tendency to give up, walk away, and turn our back on trying to make a difference. It is understandable as an easy life was promised to no one; although this modern world deceived us into believing it can. And what does making a difference even mean? The world has forever been a brutal place. I’ve seen no evidence of it being otherwise through the years I have devoted to studying it - not that I’m an expert but I have delved back a few thousand years into the Roman and Greek past. While our clothes are different, human nature has not changed. I doubt it ever will. What is this “difference” we think we can make? I have come to realise that it is not so much a difference as a contribution to how we see the world, and through our eyes whether it can impact another person trying to find their way in it. Our experiences matter. To us, and to others even if we don’t see that occurring. It could take generations to reverberate. We don’t control the timeline, merely contribute to its trajectory, all the while others do the same. So, we must Write to record our experiences. How else will anyone in the future know we have been here? We must record history
Friday, 4 April 2025
Has the Free Speech Union sold Out?
Has the Free Speech Union sold Out? It is sad to hear that No Jab! No Job! and Don't let em socialise multi millionaire Charley Mullins has Joined the Free Speech Union. I find it a oxymoron that A denier of Civil Liberties and the freedom of ones physical sovereignty could…
— Horwich Nationalists (@ivecooper) April 4, 2025








