Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best"A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move
A High Court judge has sparked outrage after wishing 'all the best' to the convicted terrorist behind the 7/7 London bombings as the authorities prepare to let him loose on our streets. Once again, an activist judge is spitting in the face of public concern. Sir Robert Jay made the comments during a hearing involving Haroon Aswat, 50, who is due to leave a psychiatric hospital and return to live with his family in Batley, West Yorkshire. Aswat, an al-Qaeda has admitted his role in the 2005 attack that left 52 dead, and claims he helped mastermind the 9/11 atrocity in the US. Despite this, and despite warnings from counter-terror police, he is expected to walk free without any GPS monitoring or ankle tag because of a legal loophole that prevents surveillance of psychiatric patients.
During the hearing at London's Royal Courts of Justice, Jay told the Wahhabi monster: 'I have to wish you all the best and say to you that the way forward is to keep on your medication, listen to the advice you are going to get, and keep out of the sort of things you were doing. The hearing marked Aswat's first public appearance since he was deported back to Britain in 2022, following his conviction for terror offences in the United States. He is currently held at Bethlem Royal Hospital in South London. Aswat trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan prior to 9/11, and helped radical hate preacher Abu Hamza establish a terror training camp in Oregon in 1999. US investigators also found his name in documents recovered from a Pakistani safehouse used by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the chief planner of the 9/11 attacks. Although never charged over the 7/7 bombings, Aswat was linked to the attack after police traced 20 calls made by the suicide bombers to a phone linked to him. Weeks later, he was arrested in Zambia carrying a terror manual and bomb-making materials. Reverse the Left’s Long March Activist judges are now one of the left’s most important assets, continually frustrating even the most moderate attempts to bring the running of the country closer to the demands of the public. The 1968 Marxist “Long March Through the Institutions” must be undone before anything can change, but there is no time to do so with a rightist counter march. If a Reform government is to achieve anything at all (those who expect it to achieve much more than that are going to be very disappointed) then one of its very first actions must be a thorough purge of activist judges. If they hide behind laws, then laws must be changed. If they hide behind ancient legal privileges, then if necessary they must be chased from their chambers by ordinary people wielding an even older privilege: The right to defend their families and communities. The targets may need to be left with their undeserved and inflated pensions, but paying for their early retirement would be a very worthwhile investment. Real justice must be done, for which we need real judges.
Pushing Reform in the right direction is one of the most important tasks now opening up for genuine nationalists. I am working on this project right now. If YOU agree that it needs doing, please make a pledge to support my work. Thank you. Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. go to Substack by ppressing the link below.
|
Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Monday, 8 September 2025
Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best" A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move
Sunday, 7 September 2025
Linehan's arrest and the free speech crisis all stems from Europe's unwanted immigration revolution
/ user-923838732
itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/s...
SUPPORT/DONATE:
MEMBERSHIP:
Join our membership scheme from only £4 per month and receive a range of benefits, including exclusive content. Depending on membership-tier level, members receive free or discounted tickets to our events, free copies of our books, invitations to private events and filming in our studio, and of course our famous NCF mug.
Visit Patreon for more info: 
/ newcultureforum
PAYPAL/ CARD PAYMENTS - ONE TIME & MONTHLY:
You can donate in a variety of ways via our website: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#do...
It is set up to accept one time and monthly donations.
JOIN US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Web: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk
F: 
/ ncultureforum
Y: 
/ newcultureforum
X: https://x.com/newcultureforum (@NewCultureForum)
I: 
/ newcultureforum
The Absolute State of Britain
/ @thesacredwayrt4
Substack 👉: https://richardthefourth.substack.com
Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/richardthefo...
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/RichardTheFou...
Twitter/X: https://x.com/RichardTheIIIIPeople mentioned
THE SIN OF TOLERATING EVIL
The mistaken idea that tolerance is always a virtue and intolerance always a vice is corrupting the very heart of our society. In the name of tolerance every evil is exalted and proudly defended, while all those who resist and condemn evil are smeared and demonized as hate mongers and bigots. Yet what are such smear tactics other than intolerance and bigotry on the part of those who claim to be tolerant? Like all who are self-righteous, the dogmatic zealots of tolerance often reveal themselves to be extremely intolerant of anything they disapprove of, yet they refuse to see any fault in themselves.
In their blindness, they fail to see that neither tolerance nor intolerance are intrinsically evil, yet both can be used for evil. A tolerance that allows sin to prosper (because it refuses to condemn and punish evil) is just as evil as an intolerance that condemns people for the color of their skin, or because they speak out against evil. The Bible tells us that God not only condemned Sodom and Gomorra for tolerating evil, but also condemned Babylon, Gibeah, Egypt, and other nations for the same reason (Judges 19:15-30, Genesis 19). Therefore, tolerating evil is not a virtue, no matter how hard Satan wants you to believe that it is. The same God that condemned Eli, because he was tolerant of the vile behavior of his sons, still condemns those who are tolerant of evil. We are not to tolerate it, nor are we to be intolerant of those who condemn it (1Samuel 3:12-13, Jeremiah 23:14, Ezekiel 3:18 and 33:8, Isaiah 5:20).
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY
One serious problem that we face in dealing with this error stems from the ambiguous nature of the word “tolerance.” At one time that word meant essentially the same thing as hating the sin, but not the sinner. However, the anti-Christian element in our society now portrays all who condemn sin as intolerant, and that is where Christians must draw the line. Because people must see their sin before they will be able to see their need for a Savior, condemning sin goes hand in hand with bringing people to Christ. That being the case, love requires us to condemn every evil, including adultery and homosexuality, while those who tell the guilty that they have no need to repent are guilty of satanic hatred.
By doing nothing to restrain or punish his sons, Eli sent them to hell. Therefore, had he really loved them, he would have made certain that they not only knew that their behavior was evil but regretted ever behaving that way. By failing to act in accordance with love, he not only lost his sons but also brought God’s condemnation on himself (read 1Samuel chapters 2 and 3).
Because some in our society would like to see all religions worship together, they want Christians to tolerate falsehood and condone those who contradict God’s Word. However, that would not be the loving thing to do, for the Bible makes it perfectly clear that there is no salvation apart from faith in Christ. If we deny that fact (by our tolerance of false religion) souls could be lost (Acts 4:12). In fact, we could not even be true to our God if we refused to condemn false gods, for God is not about to tolerate false gods. He never has, and He never will! As far as He is concerned, those who regard Him as one God among many are idolaters, no matter how tolerant they appear to be (2Kings 17:6-35).
When the children of Israel first entered the land of Cannan, God ordered the people of that land destroyed because they were tolerant of human sacrifice (abortion), immorality, and false religion (Deuteronomy 20:17). Some time later, God’s wrath was poured out on the children of Benjamin because they had become tolerant of evil (Judges 19:22-30 and 20:1-48). The Apostle Paul rebuked the congregation at Corinth because it tolerated fornication, and he pronounced a curse on those who pervert the gospel (1Corinthians 5:1-13, Galatians 1:6-9). Therefore, it should be perfectly clear that we are not to tolerate sin, but are rather to condemn and rebuke it.
THE REAL BIGOTS
Just as “multiculturalists” smear and demonize Christians today, the ancient Romans smeared and demonized the Christians of their day, calling them haters of mankind and persecuting them unmercifully because they were intolerant of their gods. Like modern-day secularists, “The Romans were a syncretistic people who saw value in all religious beliefs; they wanted to be “inclusive” as multiculturalists would say today. They were proud of the Pantheon in Rome that displayed and honored all gods. They would gladly have welcomed the addition of Jesus Christ to the Pantheon if the Christians would only have agreed to give at least some obeisance to the Roman gods. To do this, however, would have been idolatrous, unthinkable to the early Christians who unequivocally held to God's commandment; “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3)” [Under The Influence, by Alvin J. Schmidt, page 25]
Because the situation that exists today has so many similarities with the situation in ancient Rome, I want to emphasize the fact that it was not the “intolerant” Christians, but the “tolerant” Romans who tortured those who disagreed with them. Moreover, just as the ancient Romans were intolerant, I have yet to meet a modern advocate of “tolerance” who really wants to understand my point of view. In fact, it is the tolerant “multiculturalists” who are trying to force Christianity out of the Public forum, while penalizing individuals that disagree with them as to what should be tolerated. [For documentation read, “Persecution” by David Limbaugh, and “Child Abuse in the Classroom” by Phyllis Schlafly.]
FALSE RELIGION
Since every false religion has been brought into existence by Satan, he could care less which one people follow, just as long as they follow one of them (Leviticus 17:7, 1Corinthians 10:20). At the same time, he wants to sow strife and disunity among Christians, while creating an atmosphere in which those who want peace can be led to tolerate soul destroying error. Therefore, he is delighted when Christians fall for the idea that it is wrong to condemn evil.
During the last three hundred years the cult of Freemasonry has played a major role in promoting religious syncretism, and its adherents have infiltrated most denominations by soliciting members for their organization within Christian churches. At the same time, the fact that many of its members come from a Christian background helps to conceal some of the more unsavory aspects of that organization. Nevertheless, all is not as it appears. By teaching that all religions lead to God Freemasonry contradicts Scripture, by urging its members to value what is good in every religion it denies that those religions lead to hell, and by urging its members to worship with those of other religions it promotes idolatry (2Corinthians 11:13-15, Galatians 1:6-9).
Even though the Masonic religion claims to honor God, because it denies that Jesus is God it is not honoring the Triune God. In fact, it is tolerant of both paganism and occultism. Moreover, you do not have to take my word for it. Get a copy of the book, “Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.” That book, which was written by a 33rd degree Mason and it is widely regarded by Masons as authoritative, says on page 729, “The occult philosophy seems to have been the nurse or the godmother of all religions.” On page 422 we read, “Zeus is the primitive source of all things; there is one God; one power, and one rule over all.” Furthermore, many similar statements are found throughout that book. Every false religion is defended, while Christians who condemn false religion are denounced as intolerant. In regard to that sort of tolerance, the Bible says, “But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils” (1Corinthians 10:20-21).
The very fact that the Masonic lodge opens its doors to members of non-Christian religions while officially forbidding prayer to be offered in the name of Jesus, reveals both its pagan nature and its hostility to the God of the Bible.
CONCLUSION
Since we are to tolerate all that is good (Amos 5:15) and to detest all that is evil (Romans 12:9), our contempt for evil must never be twisted into an excuse to do evil. Therefore, while we should be intolerant of abortion in the sense that we want to see it made illegal, a man who shoots an abortion doctor is guilty of (and therefore tolerant of) the very crime that he condemns. While God wants us to condemn sin, He does not want us to be nasty to those who are guilty, as if we were more righteous than they, and He certainly does not want us to commit crimes.
Oh, tolerance of evil is Satan's delight
And wherever we go
We will carry on the fight
And the truth of the Lord
Shall be known, shall be known
And the truth of the Lord
Shall be known.
[To an arrangement of the tune, “They Will Know We Are Christians By Our Love.”]
Saturday, 6 September 2025
The Lessons of Epping Civil war or not, you're in a Low Trust society
When the history of Britain’s descent into ethno-religious civil war is written, the protests in Epping are sure to get a mention in an early chapter. We will have to wait for that far off publication day to find out whether the definitive version will start in 1968, with the acknowledgement that Enoch Powell was right after all. Likewise, to learn whether it will record the central role played by a spider’s web of alternative media outlets, funded by a clique of Likudnik billionaires, in pushing us to catastrophe. But there are three things to be said about Epping which have been overlooked, but which need to be considered and widely understood. First, the protests, for all their occasional rowdiness and a few scuffles sparked by the police (who still haven’t twigged that the English of today are seriously different in their mindset to the soft and forgiving English they have known, despised and pushed around with impunity throughout recent decades), were – given the depths of anger involved, very peaceful. As such, they were pretty much a Last Chance Saloon warning to the political elite: Change your ways and take serious action to address the legitimate grievances, rapidly, or risk the whole thing spinning completely out of control. Not just out of your control, but out of the control of your despised woke police service. for all its paramilitary trappings no longer a ‘force’, watch and see half the effeminate graduate social workers run for counselling and resign the moment things get nasty. Out of the control, also, of the pathetic, shrunken excuse for an army which, despite your plans to confront Russia in Ukraine, couldn’t control Bradford and Luton, let alone the rest of the place. It took a far bigger, tougher army, backed by seriously armed and dangerous local forces, to retain a semblance of control of Belfast and Londonderry. What you have at your disposal now is utterly incapable of doing the job which could all too easily need doing, very soon. For all the contempt poured on the protesters by the legacy media, and all the dark murmuring about “extremists”, the thrust of the protests was shown by the posters and slogans calling for government action, for the Powers That Be to listen and deal with the problems. The complete lack of any more radical, DIY, approach was shown by the fact that, even when actual clashes broke out with the police, or the state’s plausibly-deniable little Antifa militia groups, virtually none of the protesters involved pulled on masks. They were not, in short, there for a fight. Don’t expect that to last if you continue to ignore them, condemn them, beat them, and lock them up.
The second forgotten fact about the Epping case is being buried because it does not fit the agenda of the Zionist ‘Clash of Civilisations’ crew - who actually want a Civil War – is that the perpetrator of the sexual assault on a 14-year-old girl which triggered the protests is not a Muslim. Hadush Kebatu is an Ethiopian, and his name tells us that he is of Christian heritage. As such, he comes from the exact background that both Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage think is ideal for the future immigrants they want to see come to Britain. Tommy because he is an avid multiracialist and Nigel because capitalism demands cheap labour and young consumers. To be fair, both Tommy and Nige don’t want only Africans, they are both (just like Trump and Musk) also very keen on Indians. Millions of them. Africans delivering JustEats and driving Ubers. Hindus doing the officer jobs not taken by AI. That’s their plan to deal with gathering Britain’s demographic.
It was the same, of course, with the Southport atrocity. When the “Welsh” perpetrator turned out to be African, millions concluded – on the basis of past experience, as well as with the encouragement of the Zionist alt media network – that the Powers That Be were covering up the ‘fact’ that he was a Muslim. The belated claim (complete with outdated pictures of the little former angel) that he was a Cardiff choir boy only illustrated just how out of touch with the public mood the Home Office ‘nudge unit’ really is. As a result primarily of the State’s decades long cover-up of the grooming scandal – something which most definitely does have a Muslim connection – and the exploitation of this very real grievance by the Usual Suspects, the religion or ethnic background of any non-white perpetrator no longer really matters to millions of people. They didn’t want them, and – unlike Tommy and Nigel – they certainly don’t want any more. But the ones they really hate, with a deep, fixed, passionate hatred, are Muslims in general, and Pakistanis in particular. The big presence of Africans in professional football, and of black and mixed-race artists in hyped pop culture, has undoubtedly also played a role in ‘normalising’ African immigration. Despite all the anger over illegal ‘Boat People’, it all pushes the masses to conclude that they “aren’t all bad”, that perhaps it would be OK if we could only swap out the Muslims for ‘legal’ Africans. I don’t need to dust off my crystal ball to predict that this apprehension will be corrected very rapidly on contact with significant numbers of the newcomers. Hell, even some Muslim communities are finding that the fresh wave of Africans, Afghans, etc are hitting on their girls too. “Stop the Boats” is a demand with significant support among settled migrants too, especially those in jobs where they have to pay taxes.
The third matter arising is in the small print of the reports on the trial and conviction of Hadush Kebatu for his sexual assault on a schoolgirl. It emerged that, when they first met in the centre of her home town, she had given him a slice of pizza. If the defence thought this might sway the jury, by having given him the impression that she would welcome sexual advances, they too misjudged the public mood, but her pizza gift was ana accepted part of the case. This tells us that the teenage girl’s natural wariness of strange men was missing; that part of her survival instinct had been turned off. Who by? By her parents, if they were bourgeoise liberals. By countless kids’ programmes and TV soap operas deliberately designed to scramble her brain and turn her into a street-stupid victim waiting to be victimised. And, of course, by the entire education system, with its endless focus on white guilt and anti-racist virtue. To teach children such things is bad enough when they still live in our remaining homogeneous and indigenous communities is bad enough; it’s a form of mental child abuse even when it doesn’t put them in actual physical danger.
But to teach this to children – especially girls – who live in areas where they will encounter men from parts of the world with drastically different attitudes to sexuality and violence, or men from war zones whose humanity has been stripped away by violence, horror and genuine trauma (I’m stating facts, not making excuses for them), that isn’t just to mess with their brains and dull their instincts. It’s to groom them. It’s collaboration with abusers, rapists and murderers. It’s pimping, pandering, criminality, and the legacy media, the entire educational system and a sizeable minority of all the parents in the country are as guilty as sin. So here’s the third lesson to learn from the Epping case: The political elite have turned swathes of our country into Low Trust Zones; places in which the number of potential human predators is exponentially higher than was the case in the Britain of fifty years ago. Accordingly, loving parents now have an urgent duty to teach their children that, unfortunately, they live in a low trust society. Further, that – being white – they are in particular and extra danger from ‘others’ who have been brought up on a diet of anti-white racism, resentment and entitlement. Not from all of them, of course, but from enough to make a very substantial statistical difference. Except, of course, that to the girls raped and the boys stabbed, for being the wrong sex or the wrong colour, it is not a matter of statistics, but of pain, blood and even death. As I have repeatedly said on various (non-Zionist) alt media channels in recent years, the most dangerous places are big cities, not least because there’s plenty of entirely home-grown, indigenous trash there too. To bring up children in big urban areas is particularly dangerous, so if you’re in that position you really must redouble your efforts to Get Out of Dodge. But as Starmer’s Operation Scatter is rolled out, even hitherto totally ‘unenriched’ small towns and villages are liable to see a drastic slump in trustability levels. The politicians, police, schools and media won’t warn you or your children about this; indeed, they will continue to demonise and persecute those of us who do. But you can. If you have children of your own, you must. If you do not, then you should at least pass on this warning. Ensure that they learn the special danger from strangers who are not of our kind, and the consequent imperative, not to be mean to them, but to avoid them. And certainly not to give them slices of pizza. Imagine for a moment if you fail to do so, and as a result of your cowardice a child is beaten, stabbed, raped or murdered. Do not risk that. Do your duty. Follow Nick Griffin on substack and click the support button to help Nick Bring you real news Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. |
