Search This Blog

Tuesday, 9 September 2025

The Next Migrant Hosuing Scandal Labour's plan to 'scatter' illegals into private housing - and how to STOP IT!

 


HMOs - The Next Migrant Hosuing Scandal

Labour's plan to 'scatter' illegals into private housing - and how to STOP IT!


Join Nick on X also 
 


 

As protests continue against housing unvetted migrants in hotel luxury, the Starmer regime is promising one thing - which would be a slight improvement - and planning another - which will be even worse.

They are promising to house Boat People in disused army barracks. Seeing thse illegal gate-crashers living in the same low-grade accommodation provided to young British soldiers would be less insulting to taxpayers than putting them in hotels. Plus, most such barracks are well away from significant urban centres, so the problems caused by these people in towns like Epping would be reduced, if only thanks to a lack of potential victims for the crimes to which they are disproportionately prone.

But don’t get your hopes up. Most disued barracks are in such a poor state (as they were when squaddies lived in them) that the moment any migrants were put in them, there would b a queue of ambulance-chasing leftist legal parasites turning up to help them sue. Since Starmer is a civil rights lawyer, with no intention of leaving the ECHR, this plan isn’t going to fly. As was intended from the very start, it’s a desperate slogan to placate the masses, not a serious policy.

Starmer’s Real Plan

No. What is going to be done to try to get the illegals out of hotels, often on the wedges of our towns, is to put them into privately owned houses - right in the heart of our communities. Far more of our communities than have ever endured such “enrichment” before.

They call them Houses of Multiple Occupany - HMOs - which simply means ordinary homes, just like yours, with a tax-funded tenant living in each bedroom and sharing the facilities with others just like him. And, believe me, it will be males. Unvetted males. Often of military age. Invariably of potential sex pest age. Ypou know exactly what could go wrong!

How are decent people to react? Does this wicked and thoroughly dangerous policy really leave angry and worrid fathers and older brothers no choice but to do what Lucy Connolly said wouldn’t bother her? Fortunately not!

Because there follows a detailed document setting out eaxatly how people facing the threat of Boat Invaders being billetted in HMOs in their community can use the housing laws to stop it:

If done correctly, what I set out for you here can deliver real justice and place the British resistance on the high moral ground. However: everything must be done lawfully to hold up in court. People must follow the letter of the law, at all times.

First, here are where you’ll find the rules about HMOs, and notes as to the most promising lines of legal resistance::

  • 2004 Housing Act (HHSRS)

  • HMO licensing provisions

  • 2024 Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, including weapons, threats, violence, and serious nuisance

  • Closure notices and closure orders

  • Factors leading to closure

Comprehensive Strategy: Closing HMOs in the UK

1. Identify the HMO and Gather Evidence

  • Confirm whether the property is licensed (mandatory for large HMOs) or operating illegally.

  • Collect evidence of issues:

    • Fire hazards, faulty electrics, unsafe gas installations

    • Damp, mould, poor sanitation, inadequate heating or ventilation

    • Structural risks (loose stairs, unsafe floors)

    • Overcrowding or insufficient amenities

    • Noise, harassment, threats, weapons, or other anti-social behaviour

  • Evidence types:

    • Photos, videos, inspection reports

    • Tenant statements

    • Neighbour complaints

    • Historical records of complaints or council notices

2. Legal Framework

a) Housing Act 2004

  • Introduced Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) licensing.

  • Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS):

    • Evaluates 29 hazards including damp, mould, fire, overcrowding, poor hygiene, and electrical/gas hazards.

    • Category 1 hazards require mandatory action by the local authority:

      • Improvement notices

      • Prohibition orders

      • Emergency remedial action

  • Authorities can prosecute landlords who fail to maintain HMO properties to HHSRS standards.

b) Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2024 – Expanded for HMO Closure

The 2024 Act empowers councils and police to close premises causing harm, danger, or serious nuisance.

1. Closure Notice

  • Temporary, immediate action (up to 48 hours, extendable in emergencies).

  • Issued without a court order if urgent risk exists to:

    • Health or safety of occupants or the public

    • Immediate threat of criminal activity

  • Triggers include:

    • Weapons on premises

    • Threats or acts of violence

    • Drug dealing or production

    • Persistent harassment or intimidation of neighbours

    • Serious fire, electrical, or structural hazards

  • Purpose: Prevent imminent harm while authorities investigate.

2. Closure Order

  • Court-authorised, longer-term closure (usually 3 months initially, extendable).

  • Issued when evidence shows the property is associated with:

    • Persistent or serious anti-social behaviour

    • Criminal activity (drugs, weapons, assaults, robbery, other violent acts)

    • Risk to health or safety of tenants, neighbours, or the public

    • Repeated breaches of HMO licensing or HHSRS standards

  • Police and council powers under the order:

    • Lock premises and prevent entry

    • Evict occupants temporarily if necessary

    • Monitor compliance and enforce penalties for breach

3. Evidence Requirements for Orders

Authorities consider:

  • Witness statements (neighbours, tenants)

  • Police reports of violence, threats, or weapons possession

  • Recorded anti-social behaviour or criminal activity

  • Historical complaints and failed landlord interventions

  • HHSRS hazards contributing to risk.

4. Key Points

  • Closure Notices are for urgent, immediate risk; Closure Orders are for sustained risk or criminal/anti-social behaviour patterns.

  • Weapons, threats, or acts of violence are primary triggers for closure, even if other housing hazards exist.

  • Landlords failing to address risks may face prosecution or long-term licence revocation.

  • Tenants may be temporarily rehoused during closure- BUT NOT ILLEGALS, THEY CANNOT CLAIME HOMELESSNESS.

  • This means that the primary HMO middleman provider, the public-private rip-off giant Serco, woould b brought to their knees if this resistance spreads nationwide, as responsibility for housing the illegals would fall on them, not the taxpayers.

3. Reporting Process

  • Environmental Health / Housing Enforcement: Investigates HMO conditions, HHSRS hazards, and licensing compliance.

  • Police: Investigates anti-social behaviour or criminal activity linked to the property.

  • Reports should include:

    • Evidence of hazards, breaches, or criminal activity

    • Tenant or neighbour complaints

    • Historical pattern of non-compliance

4. Factors Leading to a Closure Notice or Order

Authorities assess:

  1. Serious risk to health or safety:

    • Fire, electrical, structural hazards

    • Overcrowding, damp, mould

    • Unsafe amenities or hygiene issues

  2. Repeated or severe anti-social behaviour:

    • Noise, harassment, intimidation, grooming, attempting sex with a child under 16 yrs

    • Criminal activity (weapons, threats, violence, drug dealing)

  3. Breach of HMO licensing or HHSRS standards

  4. History of complaints unaddressed by landlord

  5. Immediate danger requiring urgent intervention.

5. Enforcement Pathway

Step

Action

Responsible Authority

1

Inspection of property

Council / Environmental Health

2

Issue Closure Notice if immediate danger exists

Council / Police

3

Apply for Closure Order in court

Council / Police

4

Court authorises order, property locked if necessary

Police / Court

5

Follow-up inspection to ensure compliance

Council

6

Landlord prosecuted if breaches continue

Council / Court

  • Landlord can face fines, imprisonment, or licence revocation.

  • Tenants may be temporarily rehoused- BUT NOT ILLEGALS, SERCO HAS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM.

6. Supporting Actions

  • Documentation: Keep all evidence, correspondence, complaints, and inspection reports.

  • Community engagement: Encourage neighbours and tenants to report ongoing issues.

  • Public pressure: Contact local councillors or media if authorities fail to act.

  • Legal escalation: Formal complaints or civil action if council/police fail to enforce.

7. Key Notes

  • Integration of Acts: HHSRS (2004) identifies hazards; ASB 2024 Act provides immediate closure powers for serious anti-social or criminal activity.

  • Proactive approach: Collect evidence early, report promptly, and follow up with authorities.

  • Holistic enforcement: Combines housing standards, public safety, and anti-social behaviour control.

The sting:

Serco Leased Properties and Tax Compliance

Background

  • Serco leases private properties for asylum seeker accommodation under five-year government contracts.

  • Reports indicate landlords are receiving approximately 20% above market rent.

  • These arrangements are largely opaque, and it is unclear whether tax authorities are fully notified.

Key Issues

  1. Potential Windfall for Landlords

    • Standard market rent is exceeded by a government premium.

    • Raises questions about fairness and public accountability: public funds are paying above-market rates.

  2. Tax Compliance Uncertainty

    • Rental income is subject to UK income tax.

    • Landlords are legally responsible for self-reporting income.

    • Serco typically pays landlords but does not automatically deduct tax or notify HMRC directly.

    • Lack of direct reporting may lead to under-declared rental income

    • .

  3. FINAL NOTES

    Serco should be legally compelled to inform HMRC of all the landlords involved, in order to protct the public purse. This is something the left - including Labour figures who want to give the impression they are on the side of the public - should pick up and run with.

The key role of councils in the process of opposing HMOs puts Reform councils and MPs in the perfect position to show that they are on the side of their constituents, and are willing to fight to defend their communities. Even where Reform councils are in the minority, they can lead such actions and highlight them in council chambers, making themselves popular heroes in the process.

If Reformm fail in this, then the good news is that the procedure set out above can be followed by ANYBODY. You only have to be prepared to stand up for your families and community, to read and follow the rules, and to document and push every step of the way.

I’ve given you the tools, now get on with the job!

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.

Pledge your support

 
SHARE

Monday, 8 September 2025

Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best" A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move


Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best"

A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move

 


Join nick on X also
 

A High Court judge has sparked outrage after wishing 'all the best' to the convicted terrorist behind the 7/7 London bombings as the authorities prepare to let him loose on our streets. Once again, an activist judge is spitting in the face of public concern.

Sir Robert Jay made the comments during a hearing involving Haroon Aswat, 50, who is due to leave a psychiatric hospital and return to live with his family in Batley, West Yorkshire.

Aswat, an al-Qaeda has admitted his role in the 2005 attack that left 52 dead, and claims he helped mastermind the 9/11 atrocity in the US.

Despite this, and despite warnings from counter-terror police, he is expected to walk free without any GPS monitoring or ankle tag because of a legal loophole that prevents surveillance of psychiatric patients.

During the hearing at London's Royal Courts of Justice, Jay told the Wahhabi monster:

'I have to wish you all the best and say to you that the way forward is to keep on your medication, listen to the advice you are going to get, and keep out of the sort of things you were doing.

The hearing marked Aswat's first public appearance since he was deported back to Britain in 2022, following his conviction for terror offences in the United States. He is currently held at Bethlem Royal Hospital in South London.

Aswat trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan prior to 9/11, and helped radical hate preacher Abu Hamza establish a terror training camp in Oregon in 1999.

US investigators also found his name in documents recovered from a Pakistani safehouse used by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the chief planner of the 9/11 attacks.

Although never charged over the 7/7 bombings, Aswat was linked to the attack after police traced 20 calls made by the suicide bombers to a phone linked to him.

Weeks later, he was arrested in Zambia carrying a terror manual and bomb-making materials.

Reverse the Left’s Long March

Activist judges are now one of the left’s most important assets, continually frustrating even the most moderate attempts to bring the running of the country closer to the demands of the public. The 1968 Marxist “Long March Through the Institutions” must be undone before anything can change, but there is no time to do so with a rightist counter march.

If a Reform government is to achieve anything at all (those who expect it to achieve much more than that are going to be very disappointed) then one of its very first actions must be a thorough purge of activist judges.

If they hide behind laws, then laws must be changed. If they hide behind ancient legal privileges, then if necessary they must be chased from their chambers by ordinary people wielding an even older privilege: The right to defend their families and communities.

The targets may need to be left with their undeserved and inflated pensions, but paying for their early retirement would be a very worthwhile investment. Real justice must be done, for which we need real judges.

Pushing Reform in the right direction is one of the most important tasks now opening up for genuine nationalists. I am working on this project right now. If YOU agree that it needs doing, please make a pledge to support my work. Thank you. 

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. go to Substack by ppressing the link below.

Pledge your support

 
SHARE
 
 

Sunday, 7 September 2025

Linehan's arrest and the free speech crisis all stems from Europe's unwanted immigration revolution

Peter Whittle explores Linehan's arrest, the broader free speech crisis in the UK, and why European states suddenly abandoned their most basic principles. --------------- SUBSCRIBE: If you are enjoying the show, please subscribe to our channel on YouTube (click the Subscribe Button underneath the video and then Click on the Bell icon next to it to make sure you Receive All Notifications) AUDIO: If you prefer Audio you can subscribe on itunes, Soundcloud, Spotify or any major podcast platform. Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6ATCBhk... Soundcloud:   / user-923838732   itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/s... SUPPORT/DONATE: MEMBERSHIP: Join our membership scheme from only £4 per month and receive a range of benefits, including exclusive content. Depending on membership-tier level, members receive free or discounted tickets to our events, free copies of our books, invitations to private events and filming in our studio, and of course our famous NCF mug. Visit Patreon for more info:   / newcultureforum   PAYPAL/ CARD PAYMENTS - ONE TIME & MONTHLY: You can donate in a variety of ways via our website: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk/#do... It is set up to accept one time and monthly donations. JOIN US ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Web: http://www.newcultureforum.org.uk F:   / ncultureforum   Y:    / newcultureforum   X: https://x.com/newcultureforum (@NewCultureForum) I:   / newcultureforum  

The Absolute State of Britain

a quick review of the state of Britain, as we see the attempted co-opting of Gamonzilla and the increasing isolation of the Starminator. The Sacred Way (Sister Channel):    / @thesacredwayrt4   Substack 👉: https://richardthefourth.substack.com Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/richardthefo... Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/RichardTheFou... Twitter/X: https://x.com/RichardTheIIII

THE SIN OF TOLERATING EVIL

 

THE SIN OF TOLERATING EVIL

A Study By
Gary Ray Branscome


 


"I will perform against Eli all the things which I have spoken concerning his house… because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not." (1Samuel 3:12-13)

    
 
    The mistaken idea that tolerance is always a virtue and intolerance always a vice is corrupting the very heart of our society. In the name of tolerance every evil is exalted and proudly defended, while all those who resist and condemn evil are smeared and demonized as hate mongers and bigots. Yet what are such smear tactics other than intolerance and bigotry on the part of those who claim to be tolerant? Like all who are self-righteous, the dogmatic zealots of tolerance often reveal themselves to be extremely intolerant of anything they disapprove of, yet they refuse to see any fault in themselves.

    In their blindness, they fail to see that neither tolerance nor intolerance are intrinsically evil, yet both can be used for evil. A tolerance that allows sin to prosper (because it refuses to condemn and punish evil) is just as evil as an intolerance that condemns people for the color of their skin, or because they speak out against evil. The Bible tells us that God not only condemned Sodom and Gomorra for tolerating evil, but also condemned Babylon, Gibeah, Egypt, and other nations for the same reason (Judges 19:15-30, Genesis 19). Therefore, tolerating evil is not a virtue, no matter how hard Satan wants you to believe that it is. The same God that condemned Eli, because he was tolerant of the vile behavior of his sons, still condemns those who are tolerant of evil. We are not to tolerate it, nor are we to be intolerant of those who condemn it (1Samuel 3:12-13, Jeremiah 23:14, Ezekiel 3:18 and 33:8, Isaiah 5:20).
 

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY


    One serious problem that we face in dealing with this error stems from the ambiguous nature of the word “tolerance.” At one time that word meant essentially the same thing as hating the sin, but not the sinner. However, the anti-Christian element in our society now portrays all who condemn sin as intolerant, and that is where Christians must draw the line. Because people must see their sin before they will be able to see their need for a Savior, condemning sin goes hand in hand with bringing people to Christ. That being the case, love requires us to condemn every evil, including adultery and homosexuality, while those who tell the guilty that they have no need to repent are guilty of satanic hatred.

    By doing nothing to restrain or punish his sons, Eli sent them to hell. Therefore, had he really loved them, he would have made certain that they not only knew that their behavior was evil but regretted ever behaving that way. By failing to act in accordance with love, he not only lost his sons but also brought God’s condemnation on himself (read 1Samuel chapters 2 and 3).

    Because some in our society would like to see all religions worship together, they want Christians to tolerate falsehood and condone those who contradict God’s Word. However, that would not be the loving thing to do, for the Bible makes it perfectly clear that there is no salvation apart from faith in Christ. If we deny that fact (by our tolerance of false religion) souls could be lost (Acts 4:12). In fact, we could not even be true to our God if we refused to condemn false gods, for God is not about to tolerate false gods. He never has, and He never will! As far as He is concerned, those who regard Him as one God among many are idolaters, no matter how tolerant they appear to be (2Kings 17:6-35).

    When the children of Israel first entered the land of Cannan, God ordered the people of that land destroyed because they were tolerant of human sacrifice (abortion), immorality, and false religion (Deuteronomy 20:17). Some time later, God’s wrath was poured out on the children of Benjamin because they had become tolerant of evil (Judges 19:22-30 and 20:1-48). The Apostle Paul rebuked the congregation at Corinth because it tolerated fornication, and he pronounced a curse on those who pervert the gospel (1Corinthians 5:1-13, Galatians 1:6-9). Therefore, it should be perfectly clear that we are not to tolerate sin, but are rather to condemn and rebuke it.

THE REAL BIGOTS


    Just as “multiculturalists” smear and demonize Christians today, the ancient Romans smeared and demonized the Christians of their day, calling them haters of mankind and persecuting them unmercifully because they were intolerant of their gods. Like modern-day secularists, “The Romans were a syncretistic people who saw value in all religious beliefs; they wanted to be “inclusive” as multiculturalists would say today. They were proud of the Pantheon in Rome that displayed and honored all gods. They would gladly have welcomed the addition of Jesus Christ to the Pantheon if the Christians would only have agreed to give at least some obeisance to the Roman gods. To do this, however, would have been idolatrous, unthinkable to the early Christians who unequivocally held to God's commandment; “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3)” [Under The Influence, by Alvin J. Schmidt, page 25]
 
    Because the situation that exists today has so many similarities with the situation in ancient Rome, I want to emphasize the fact that it was not the “intolerant” Christians, but the “tolerant” Romans who tortured those who disagreed with them. Moreover, just as the ancient Romans were intolerant, I have yet to meet a modern advocate of “tolerance” who really wants to understand my point of view. In fact, it is the tolerant  “multiculturalists” who are trying to force Christianity out of the Public forum, while penalizing individuals that disagree with them as to what should be tolerated. [For documentation read, “Persecution” by David Limbaugh, and “Child Abuse in the Classroom” by Phyllis Schlafly.]
 

FALSE RELIGION


    Since every false religion has been brought into existence by Satan, he could care less which one people follow, just as long as they follow one of them (Leviticus 17:7, 1Corinthians 10:20). At the same time, he wants to sow strife and disunity among Christians, while creating an atmosphere in which those who want peace can be led to tolerate soul destroying error. Therefore, he is delighted when Christians fall for the idea that it is wrong to condemn evil.

    During the last three hundred years the cult of Freemasonry has played a major role in promoting religious syncretism, and its adherents have infiltrated most denominations by soliciting members for their organization within Christian churches. At the same time, the fact that many of its members come from a Christian background helps to conceal some of the more unsavory aspects of that organization. Nevertheless, all is not as it appears. By teaching that all religions lead to God Freemasonry contradicts Scripture, by urging its members to value what is good in every religion it denies that those religions lead to hell, and by urging its members to worship with those of other religions it promotes idolatry (2Corinthians 11:13-15, Galatians 1:6-9).
 
    Even though the Masonic religion claims to honor God, because it denies that Jesus is God it is not honoring the Triune God. In fact, it is tolerant of both paganism and occultism. Moreover, you do not have to take my word for it. Get a copy of the book, “Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.” That book, which was written by a 33rd degree Mason and it is widely regarded by Masons as authoritative,  says on page 729, “The occult philosophy seems to have been the nurse or the godmother of all religions.” On page 422 we read, “Zeus is the primitive source of all things; there is one God; one power, and one rule over all.” Furthermore, many similar statements are found throughout that book. Every false religion is defended, while Christians who condemn false religion are denounced as intolerant. In regard to that sort of tolerance, the Bible says, “But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils” (1Corinthians 10:20-21).

    The very fact that the Masonic lodge opens its doors to members of non-Christian religions while officially forbidding prayer to be offered in the name of Jesus, reveals both its pagan nature and its hostility to the God of the Bible.

CONCLUSION


    Since we are to tolerate all that is good (Amos 5:15) and to detest all that is evil (Romans 12:9), our contempt for evil must never be twisted into an excuse to do evil. Therefore, while we should be intolerant of abortion in the sense that we want to see it made illegal, a man who shoots an abortion doctor is guilty of (and therefore tolerant of) the very crime that he condemns. While God wants us to condemn sin, He does not want us to be nasty to those who are guilty, as if we were more righteous than they, and He certainly does not want us to commit crimes.

Tolerance of evil is Satan's delight
Oh, tolerance of evil is Satan's delight
And wherever we go
We will carry on the fight
And the truth of the Lord
Shall be known, shall be known
And the truth of the Lord
Shall be known.
[To an arrangement of the tune, “They Will Know We Are Christians By Our Love.”]