Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Charlie Kirk Assassination Cui Bono?  "Jewish Funders Have a Lot of Explaining to Do" NICK GRIFFIN SEP 11 follow Nick on X also Who benefits from the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Many leftists loathed him for his role in bringing millions of young Americans to Donald Trump. In the atmosphere of intolerant hatred fostered by the rhetoric and ‘black block’ tactics of Antifa, there must have been thousands of ultra-left students fantasing about buying their first gun and shooting him dead. Likewise, many Muslims hated him on account of his repeated attacks on the very idea of the existence of Palestine, and his denial of the ongoing genocide in Gaza. But do leftist students really have what it takes to carry out a professional ‘hit’ and then vanish without trace (so far at least)? I very much doubt it. The situation with Muslims is a bit different, significant numbers have combat experience, and bigger balls than your average pencil-necked leftist. But a brown man at a Charlie Kirk rally would find it distinctly difficult to blend in, let alone disappear when the hero of the event has just been shot. So who does that leave? Here I must make a confession: Owing to Charlie Kirk’s long record of shameless shilling for Israel, I took my eye off him several years ago. I simply couldn’t stomach listening to his beautifully delivered, Christian-Zionist-inspired, propaganda lies or, for that matter, his Ayn Randian enthusiasm for capitalism, and occasional defence of the idea of letting millions of Hindu computer geeks flood the West. So I entirely missed the remarkable shift in Charlie Kirk’s position over just the last couple of weeks. A shift in position so striking that, now it’s been drawn to my attention, puts his murder in an entirely different light. Here are the two most telling clips I’ve seen so far: So, within days of Charlie Kirk ‘noticing’ the key role of “secular Jews” and “Jewish donors” as the number one backers of the Cultural Marxist, woke war on Western civilisation - and daring to speak about it on his massively popular and influential platform - Charlie Kirk is assassinated in a professional hit. And, within days of Charlie Kirk pointing out, in his logical, convincing way, that Netanyahu and Co knew October 7 was coming, but let it happen as a way of keeping Bibi out of prison and preparing the ground for the next leap forward in the long march to Greater Israel, Charlie Kirk lies stiff and cold in the morgue. Unless the US authorities can find and arrest (or more likely kill) a very convincing leftist or Muslim shooter - and quickly - millions of Americans will quickly come to the almost unavoidable conclusion that Charlie Kirk was taken out by Mossad. His ‘crime’? Waking up to the fact that his former idolisation of the Israeli terror state, and the people who built it, was a grave error. And starting to make up for his previous falsities by doing what Charlie Kirk always did best: Telling the truth as he believed it to be. Except that, this time, in the last two weeks, the truth as he believed it has been the actual truth - or at least a very important part of it. And, for that, this young father of two children, and of the Gen Z Trump movement, paid with his life. This is more than a murder; it is going to be one of the most important and significant crimes in the history of the United States. Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. Pledge your support   SHARE

 

Gen Z Liberal America Committing Demographic Suicide Gen Z conservatives and leftists have VERY different attitudes to having children NICK GRIFFIN SEP 10 Join Nick on X Also  A new survey has highlighted the staggering difference between the attitude of young conservative and liberal-left adults in the USA towards having children. Since political leaning and religiosity are heavily hereditable (see Ed Dutton on his excellent Jolly Heretic Substack for more) it makes it inevitable that future America will be even more religious and conservative than today. The trend is clearly present in the UK too, though less markedly so at present. Gen Z male Trump supporters view “having children” as the most important indicator of “success,” according to a new poll from SurveyMonkey and NBC News. The survey of nearly 3,000 young adults age 18-29 asked a series of questions about politics, work, and life goals. 34% of the male Trump voters ranked having children as the very top measure of success, with many of those preferring financial independence or stability ranking having children second. The question about what it means to have success highlighted differences not just between liberal female voters and male conservatives but also between young male Republicans and young female Republicans. Respondents were able to pick their top three choices from a list of 13 measures of success. “Where the cultural differences between Gen Z men and women get particularly stark is when the breakdown includes who they voted for in the 2024 election,” NBC News noted in an analysis article. Female Harris voters picked “having a job or career you find fulfilling,” the most, followed by “having enough money to do the things you want to do,” and finally, “having emotional stability.” Note the survey included a separate option, “achieving financial independence” which is similar to “having enough money do the things you want to do.” Among their least chosen answers were “being married” and “having children.” Female Trump supporters did not rank having children, and thus a family, quite as high as their male counterparts. To be precise, they are 8% behind, a figure which undoubtedly reflects the toxic influence of university indoctrination on girls, but which does not justify the chorus of women-hating Incels already bleating about alleged terminal female liberalism. The top six answers for female Trump supporters were: “Achieving financial independence,” “having a job or career you find fulfilling,” “owning your own home,” “being spiritually grounded,” and “having enough money to do the things you want to do.” Last among the top six was “having children,” highlighting a split even between conservative Gen Z’ers. Despite that, Republican Gen Z women are much closer to their male counterparts than they are to young Democrat women. 26% of female Trumpists rated having children as the top measure of success, against the mere 6% among Harris-voting women, and 9% among her make supporters. The news spells big long-term demographic trouble for liberal-left America. Political leanings are heavily influenced by genetics and family upbringing, so voters of a particular persuasion tend to have children who follow in their political footsteps. Liberal, atheistic America is simply being outbred by Christian conservatives. Long may it continue! With four children and eleven grandchildren, I’m doing my part. Are YOU? Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. Pledge your support   SHARE

Dieversity - it's not just a 'Muslim problem' Nick Griffin Reviews the weeks News

 

Nick Griffin cuts through the waffle with a hard-hitting look at some of the week's most important news. And things that haven't made the news, precisely because they're too important.

The Next Migrant Hosuing Scandal Labour's plan to 'scatter' illegals into private housing - and how to STOP IT!

 

HMOs - The Next Migrant Hosuing Scandal Labour's plan to 'scatter' illegals into private housing - and how to STOP IT! NICK GRIFFIN SEP 9 Join Nick on X also  As protests continue against housing unvetted migrants in hotel luxury, the Starmer regime is promising one thing - which would be a slight improvement - and planning another - which will be even worse. They are promising to house Boat People in disused army barracks. Seeing thse illegal gate-crashers living in the same low-grade accommodation provided to young British soldiers would be less insulting to taxpayers than putting them in hotels. Plus, most such barracks are well away from significant urban centres, so the problems caused by these people in towns like Epping would be reduced, if only thanks to a lack of potential victims for the crimes to which they are disproportionately prone. But don’t get your hopes up. Most disued barracks are in such a poor state (as they were when squaddies lived in them) that the moment any migrants were put in them, there would b a queue of ambulance-chasing leftist legal parasites turning up to help them sue. Since Starmer is a civil rights lawyer, with no intention of leaving the ECHR, this plan isn’t going to fly. As was intended from the very start, it’s a desperate slogan to placate the masses, not a serious policy. Starmer’s Real Plan No. What is going to be done to try to get the illegals out of hotels, often on the wedges of our towns, is to put them into privately owned houses - right in the heart of our communities. Far more of our communities than have ever endured such “enrichment” before. They call them Houses of Multiple Occupany - HMOs - which simply means ordinary homes, just like yours, with a tax-funded tenant living in each bedroom and sharing the facilities with others just like him. And, believe me, it will be males. Unvetted males. Often of military age. Invariably of potential sex pest age. Ypou know exactly what could go wrong! How are decent people to react? Does this wicked and thoroughly dangerous policy really leave angry and worrid fathers and older brothers no choice but to do what Lucy Connolly said wouldn’t bother her? Fortunately not! Because there follows a detailed document setting out eaxatly how people facing the threat of Boat Invaders being billetted in HMOs in their community can use the housing laws to stop it: If done correctly, what I set out for you here can deliver real justice and place the British resistance on the high moral ground. However: everything must be done lawfully to hold up in court. People must follow the letter of the law, at all times. First, here are where you’ll find the rules about HMOs, and notes as to the most promising lines of legal resistance:: 2004 Housing Act (HHSRS) HMO licensing provisions 2024 Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, including weapons, threats, violence, and serious nuisance Closure notices and closure orders Factors leading to closure Comprehensive Strategy: Closing HMOs in the UK 1. Identify the HMO and Gather Evidence Confirm whether the property is licensed (mandatory for large HMOs) or operating illegally. Collect evidence of issues: Fire hazards, faulty electrics, unsafe gas installations Damp, mould, poor sanitation, inadequate heating or ventilation Structural risks (loose stairs, unsafe floors) Overcrowding or insufficient amenities Noise, harassment, threats, weapons, or other anti-social behaviour Evidence types: Photos, videos, inspection reports Tenant statements Neighbour complaints Historical records of complaints or council notices 2. Legal Framework a) Housing Act 2004 Introduced Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) licensing. Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS): Evaluates 29 hazards including damp, mould, fire, overcrowding, poor hygiene, and electrical/gas hazards. Category 1 hazards require mandatory action by the local authority: Improvement notices Prohibition orders Emergency remedial action Authorities can prosecute landlords who fail to maintain HMO properties to HHSRS standards. b) Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2024 – Expanded for HMO Closure The 2024 Act empowers councils and police to close premises causing harm, danger, or serious nuisance. 1. Closure Notice Temporary, immediate action (up to 48 hours, extendable in emergencies). Issued without a court order if urgent risk exists to: Health or safety of occupants or the public Immediate threat of criminal activity Triggers include: Weapons on premises Threats or acts of violence Drug dealing or production Persistent harassment or intimidation of neighbours Serious fire, electrical, or structural hazards Purpose: Prevent imminent harm while authorities investigate. 2. Closure Order Court-authorised, longer-term closure (usually 3 months initially, extendable). Issued when evidence shows the property is associated with: Persistent or serious anti-social behaviour Criminal activity (drugs, weapons, assaults, robbery, other violent acts) Risk to health or safety of tenants, neighbours, or the public Repeated breaches of HMO licensing or HHSRS standards Police and council powers under the order: Lock premises and prevent entry Evict occupants temporarily if necessary Monitor compliance and enforce penalties for breach 3. Evidence Requirements for Orders Authorities consider: Witness statements (neighbours, tenants) Police reports of violence, threats, or weapons possession Recorded anti-social behaviour or criminal activity Historical complaints and failed landlord interventions HHSRS hazards contributing to risk. 4. Key Points Closure Notices are for urgent, immediate risk; Closure Orders are for sustained risk or criminal/anti-social behaviour patterns. Weapons, threats, or acts of violence are primary triggers for closure, even if other housing hazards exist. Landlords failing to address risks may face prosecution or long-term licence revocation. Tenants may be temporarily rehoused during closure- BUT NOT ILLEGALS, THEY CANNOT CLAIME HOMELESSNESS. This means that the primary HMO middleman provider, the public-private rip-off giant Serco, woould b brought to their knees if this resistance spreads nationwide, as responsibility for housing the illegals would fall on them, not the taxpayers. 3. Reporting Process Environmental Health / Housing Enforcement: Investigates HMO conditions, HHSRS hazards, and licensing compliance. Police: Investigates anti-social behaviour or criminal activity linked to the property. Reports should include: Evidence of hazards, breaches, or criminal activity Tenant or neighbour complaints Historical pattern of non-compliance 4. Factors Leading to a Closure Notice or Order Authorities assess: Serious risk to health or safety: Fire, electrical, structural hazards Overcrowding, damp, mould Unsafe amenities or hygiene issues Repeated or severe anti-social behaviour: Noise, harassment, intimidation, grooming, attempting sex with a child under 16 yrs Criminal activity (weapons, threats, violence, drug dealing) Breach of HMO licensing or HHSRS standards History of complaints unaddressed by landlord Immediate danger requiring urgent intervention. 5. Enforcement Pathway Step Action Responsible Authority 1 Inspection of property Council / Environmental Health 2 Issue Closure Notice if immediate danger exists Council / Police 3 Apply for Closure Order in court Council / Police 4 Court authorises order, property locked if necessary Police / Court 5 Follow-up inspection to ensure compliance Council 6 Landlord prosecuted if breaches continue Council / Court Landlord can face fines, imprisonment, or licence revocation. Tenants may be temporarily rehoused- BUT NOT ILLEGALS, SERCO HAS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM. 6. Supporting Actions Documentation: Keep all evidence, correspondence, complaints, and inspection reports. Community engagement: Encourage neighbours and tenants to report ongoing issues. Public pressure: Contact local councillors or media if authorities fail to act. Legal escalation: Formal complaints or civil action if council/police fail to enforce. 7. Key Notes Integration of Acts: HHSRS (2004) identifies hazards; ASB 2024 Act provides immediate closure powers for serious anti-social or criminal activity. Proactive approach: Collect evidence early, report promptly, and follow up with authorities. Holistic enforcement: Combines housing standards, public safety, and anti-social behaviour control. The sting: Serco Leased Properties and Tax Compliance Background Serco leases private properties for asylum seeker accommodation under five-year government contracts. Reports indicate landlords are receiving approximately 20% above market rent. These arrangements are largely opaque, and it is unclear whether tax authorities are fully notified. Key Issues Potential Windfall for Landlords Standard market rent is exceeded by a government premium. Raises questions about fairness and public accountability: public funds are paying above-market rates. Tax Compliance Uncertainty Rental income is subject to UK income tax. Landlords are legally responsible for self-reporting income. Serco typically pays landlords but does not automatically deduct tax or notify HMRC directly. Lack of direct reporting may lead to under-declared rental income . FINAL NOTES Serco should be legally compelled to inform HMRC of all the landlords involved, in order to protct the public purse. This is something the left - including Labour figures who want to give the impression they are on the side of the public - should pick up and run with. The key role of councils in the process of opposing HMOs puts Reform councils and MPs in the perfect position to show that they are on the side of their constituents, and are willing to fight to defend their communities. Even where Reform councils are in the minority, they can lead such actions and highlight them in council chambers, making themselves popular heroes in the process. If Reformm fail in this, then the good news is that the procedure set out above can be followed by ANYBODY. You only have to be prepared to stand up for your families and community, to read and follow the rules, and to document and push every step of the way. I’ve given you the tools, now get on with the job! Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. Pledge your support   SHARE

Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best" A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move

Judge Wishes 7/7 Mastermind "All the Best" A Judicial Purge Should be Reform's First Move NICK GRIFFIN SEP 8   Join nick on X also   A High Court judge has sparked outrage after wishing 'all the best' to the convicted terrorist behind the 7/7 London bombings as the authorities prepare to let him loose on our streets. Once again, an activist judge is spitting in the face of public concern. Sir Robert Jay made the comments during a hearing involving Haroon Aswat, 50, who is due to leave a psychiatric hospital and return to live with his family in Batley, West Yorkshire. Aswat, an al-Qaeda has admitted his role in the 2005 attack that left 52 dead, and claims he helped mastermind the 9/11 atrocity in the US. Despite this, and despite warnings from counter-terror police, he is expected to walk free without any GPS monitoring or ankle tag because of a legal loophole that prevents surveillance of psychiatric patients. During the hearing at London's Royal Courts of Justice, Jay told the Wahhabi monster: 'I have to wish you all the best and say to you that the way forward is to keep on your medication, listen to the advice you are going to get, and keep out of the sort of things you were doing. The hearing marked Aswat's first public appearance since he was deported back to Britain in 2022, following his conviction for terror offences in the United States. He is currently held at Bethlem Royal Hospital in South London. Aswat trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan prior to 9/11, and helped radical hate preacher Abu Hamza establish a terror training camp in Oregon in 1999. US investigators also found his name in documents recovered from a Pakistani safehouse used by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the chief planner of the 9/11 attacks. Although never charged over the 7/7 bombings, Aswat was linked to the attack after police traced 20 calls made by the suicide bombers to a phone linked to him. Weeks later, he was arrested in Zambia carrying a terror manual and bomb-making materials. Reverse the Left’s Long March Activist judges are now one of the left’s most important assets, continually frustrating even the most moderate attempts to bring the running of the country closer to the demands of the public. The 1968 Marxist “Long March Through the Institutions” must be undone before anything can change, but there is no time to do so with a rightist counter march. If a Reform government is to achieve anything at all (those who expect it to achieve much more than that are going to be very disappointed) then one of its very first actions must be a thorough purge of activist judges. If they hide behind laws, then laws must be changed. If they hide behind ancient legal privileges, then if necessary they must be chased from their chambers by ordinary people wielding an even older privilege: The right to defend their families and communities. The targets may need to be left with their undeserved and inflated pensions, but paying for their early retirement would be a very worthwhile investment. Real justice must be done, for which we need real judges. Pushing Reform in the right direction is one of the most important tasks now opening up for genuine nationalists. I am working on this project right now. If YOU agree that it needs doing, please make a pledge to support my work. Thank you.  Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. go to Substack by ppressing the link below. Pledge your support   SHARE