Search This Blog

Saturday, 1 November 2025

A Christian Declaration of Independence From the Zionist Lobby

 

A Christian Declaration of Independence



A line has been crossed in the conscience of the American Christian. The theological and political chains that bound us to a foreign agenda, crafted not in the interests of our nation but for the benefit of those who reject our Lord, have been broken. For generations, we labored under a dual loyalty: pledging our hearts to Christ and the American nation while our government bowed to Israel and Jewish donors. We funded wars we didn’t believe in, silenced truths we were called to speak, and sacrificed our sons and daughters on altars of a foreign nation that scorns the very name of Jesus.

That captivity ends now.

This is our Christian Declaration of Independence from Jewish power. A sovereign assertion that our allegiance is to God alone, and that our nation’s destiny will no longer be mortgaged to the interests of a predatory ethnic lobby or an unbelieving nation state. We reject the curated guilt, the theological distortions, and the political blackmail that have long subverted our witness and plundered our republic. We have seen the cost of compromise, and we will pay it no longer. This is where we take our stand. This is where we draw the line.

The primary, overriding issue in American politics today is not the border, not the economy, not even the cultural rot—it is the question of sovereignty. Specifically, it is the unresolved and unaddressed problem of a powerful, organized minority exercising a degree of influence over our government that is wholly disproportionate to its size and fundamentally at odds with the interests of the American nation. When our elected officials, from both parties, are beholden to the agenda of a foreign nation-state and the domestic lobbying power of a 2% minority, we do not, in any meaningful sense, have a government of, by, and for the American people.

We have a captured state.

You cannot secure the border when the same political class is committed to policies of demographic transformation that weaken national cohesion. You cannot revive American industry when our treasury is drained to fund endless foreign wars that serve another country’s security needs. You cannot protect free speech when criticizing a specific ethnic lobby or a foreign ally is instantly deemed unacceptable and career-ending. You cannot have a coherent foreign policy when it is subcontracted to a nation that views the world through the lens of its own perpetual conflict.

Until this fundamental conflict of interest is resolved, every other political goal is a secondary concern, a mere distraction. It is the political equivalent of trying to furnish a house that is on fire. The architects of this influence understand this perfectly. They keep the public fighting over secondary issues like the latest cultural outrage, the partisan food fights. Meanwhile the primary lever of power remains untouched in their hands. They have made their tribal interests synonymous with “American interests” through sheer repetition and intimidation.

This is not about individuals; it is about power structures. It is about a system where politicians who dare to put America first are systematically isolated, defunded, and destroyed by a network of donors, media outlets, and think tanks. The message is clear: your allegiance must be to this foreign agenda, or you have no future in American politics.

The task before us is not merely to win elections, but to break this stranglehold. We must name the problem openly and reject the cowardly labels hurled at us to enforce silence. We must build parallel institutions that are funded by and loyal only to the American people. We must elect representatives who fear their constituents more than they fear a handful of Jewish donors.

Until we reclaim our sovereignty, until we establish that the American nation is the sole master of the American state, we are merely rearranging deck chairs on a ship that is being steered by a foreign captain. Nothing else matters until this is fixed.

The hollow “Christian Zionism” of the past is a dying creed, exposed as a theological error and a geopolitical scam. It is being replaced by a new generation of Christians who put Christ first. We are reclaiming our movement, our nation, and our most importantly: our faith.

The theological error of conflating modern political Israel with the Biblical Israel of God is one of the most consequential and destructive false doctrines to infiltrate the modern church. It represents a fundamental misunderstanding of scripture and a dangerous subversion of Christianity itself. The Bible is explicitly clear that the old covenant, which defined the national identity of ethnic Israel, was made obsolete by the new covenant ratified in the blood of Christ. (Hebrews 8:13) The apostle Paul, writing to the Gentiles in Galatians, dismantles this very confusion: “And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise” (Galatians 3:29). The chosen people are no longer defined by bloodline or circumcision of the body, but by faith in Jesus Christ. We, the Church are the true Israel of God (Galatians 6:16).

This doctrine also willfully ignores the stark warnings of Christ Himself. He directly told the Pharisees, the religious leaders of ethnic Israel, “Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits” (Matthew 21:43). The Gospels and Acts are filled with accounts of national Israel’s rejection of her Messiah, culminating in the acknowledgment that “the Jews… killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets” (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15). To then turn around and grant a divine, unqualified mandate to the secular state founded by those who continue to reject that same Messiah is a profound theological incoherence. It elevates a political entity above the very God it denies.

This flawed theology has led to a form of Christian idolatry, where a foreign flag is placed beside the cross and loyalty to an ethnostate is confused with faithfulness to God. It has caused many to bless what God does not bless and curse what God does not curse. Our mandate is to preach the gospel to all nations, making disciples of Jesus Christ, not to act as the geopolitical arm of a nation that actively opposes the Lordship of Jesus.

To claim that God maintains a separate, parallel covenant of earthly blessing with those who explicitly reject His Son is to neuter the Gospel itself. It creates a doctrine of salvation through genealogy, a concept the New Testament utterly demolishes. It suggests that the blood of Christ is insufficient for Jews, who can instead rely on their ethnicity for divine favor. This is not just a theological error; it is a denial of the exclusivity and sufficiency of Jesus Christ for all of humanity. The wall of partition has been torn down. To seek to rebuild it is to stand against the finished work of the cross.

We won’t stand for this subversion of our faith for a moment longer.

They will try to stop this. They will smear, they will lie, they will threaten. But every attempt to silence us only proves our point and drives more people to our cause. We have the hearts and minds of the youth. We have the truth and we are done asking for permission to speak it.

This is not about hate. It is about clarity. It is about sovereignty. It is about finally, and unequivocally, putting America and Americans first.

This isn’t a political disagreement; it’s a fundamental clash of civilizations happening within our own borders. They have their ethnostate, built on a foundation that explicitly rejects the cornerstone of our faith. We are expected to cheer for this? To bankrupt our own nation to protect a regime that views our core beliefs as idolatry? The cognitive dissonance required to be a “Christian Zionist” is a burden the younger generation simply refuses to carry. We choose Christ over Tel Aviv. We choose American sovereignty over Jewish agendas.

They mock us as radicals, but we are simply the logical conclusion of placing America First. You cannot put America first while simultaneously pledging unconditional allegiance to a nation that operates with entirely different, and often opposing, strategic goals. Their love for America is transactional, contingent on the endless flow of our treasure and the blood of our soldiers. Our love for America is covenantal, rooted in the land, the people, and the God-given rights established here.

The so-called “conservative” Jews who claim to be on our side have always had an exit strategy. Their allegiance has a backup plan. Ours does not. This is our only home. We are fighting for its survival. We see the demographic transformation, the cultural decay, the economic plunder and we recognize the same hands on the levers of power enabling it all. The connection is no longer deniable.

This movement is organic. It is leaderless by design, because it is an idea whose time has come. Every time they try to deplatform us, they hand us a megaphone. Every time they call us names, they reveal their own intellectual bankruptcy. They are the past, clinging to outdated paradigms. We are the future, armed with the truth and the unwavering conviction that our nation, our faith, and our people are worth defending above all else.

We are not petitioning for a seat at their table. We are building our own from the timber of our own land, with the uncompromising truth as its foundation. Their power was always an illusion, a spell woven with threats and money that breaks the moment a people regain their courage and remember who they are.

We are that people.

Let this be heard in every boardroom, every newsroom, and every hallway of power: your veto is canceled. Your influence is revoked. The free ride on the backs of American taxpayers and the graves of American soldiers is over. The era of bowing to a foreign interest while our own cities decay and our own people suffer has reached its expiration date.

This is a declaration of independence. Not from a foreign king, but from a domestic occupation of our political and spiritual life. We will no longer be a vassal state to any tribe, any lobby, or any foreign power. Our allegiance is to Christ, our country, and our children’s future. From this, we will not be moved.

We are taking back everything that was stolen: our sovereignty, our discourse, our faith, and our nation. The gates of hell itself shall not prevail against the Church and they will certainly not prevail against a nation of awakened Christians who have finally chosen to put the Kingdom of God and the American Republic above the interests of a deceitful and manipulative foreign lobby.

There is no going back. The future belongs to those who are brave enough to seize it in the name of truth.

We are that future whether you like it or not and we have only just begun to fight.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc

Christ is King

Top 10 Articles of the Errk on The Conservative Woman


 THESE are the most-read articles we have published in the past week.

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.
If you have not already signed up to a daily email alert of new articles please do so. It is here and free! Thank you.

Friday, 31 October 2025

'Britain is being deliberately DEMOLISHED': Neil Oliver fumes migrant crisis

Neil Oliver argues Britain's open borders are due less to incompetence and more to the political whims of the country's elites.

Thursday, 30 October 2025

The Conservative Woman Daily Posts

 

TCW Daily

Exit the Epping sex offender – with a £500 bribe

TCW
Exit the Epping sex offender – with a £500 bribe

EPPING asylum hotel sex offender Hadush Kebatu has finally been deported following his farcical release from jail in Chelmsford. His subsequent adventures involved wandering around London parks while police failed for two days to find him. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: ‘Last week’s blunder should never have happened – and I share the public’s anger […]

No wonder we don’t respect our betters

Robin Fellow
No wonder we don’t respect our betters

IT is a common experience to lose respect for one’s betters with age, but the process seems to have accelerated in recent years. Let’s consider some of the classes we are supposed to look up to. We admired the late queen. I’d argue that was more to do with what she didn’t do (express opinions) […]

Have even the sensible Swiss lost the gender plot?

Janice Davis
Have even the sensible Swiss lost the gender plot?

SOME news items just take your breath away. According to a report from the Free Speech Union (FSU) in April, British police were making more than 30 arrests a day over offensive posts on social media. This leads to thousands of people being detained and questioned for sending messages that cause ‘annoyance’, ‘inconvenience’ or ‘anxiety’ […]

AUT 15M and a system crying out to be milked

Susan Wallgarden
AUT 15M and a system crying out to be milked

WHO buys personalised number plates? Perhaps you do. People like to buy them for birthdays or for new cars. Sometimes there are quite sensible purposes: for example in business you might want to disguise the age of your car so that potential clients think you are more successful than you really are. You might also […]

Europe’s choice: Return to Christianity or endure Islam

Dr Campbell Campbell-Jack
Europe’s choice: Return to Christianity or endure Islam

FOR decades Europe has slowly, but now with increasing rapidity, been committing suicide. The people of the continent have lost all sense of who and what they are. Europe has forgotten its past, and any sense of connection to it, and as a result has lost its identity and its reason for being. The future […]

Letter of the day: Respect?

Our Readers
Letter of the day: Respect?

Dear Editor I agree with Robert Worms (TCW yesterday) that political rage has passed the point of good sense, and that resorting to abuse on a regular basis will just drive decent people out of politics. I am with him when he says we should try to be polite when discussing politics. But it’s very […]

Dear Subscriber, if you enjoy this newsletter, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. 

We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments.
You can donate by clicking here.
Thank you.

Follow us on 

x

Rachel Reeves Must GO!

 

Rachel Reeves Must GO!

How ANY Tenant In Southwark could help send Rachel Reeves Packing

By Nick Griffin Oct 2025

 Follow Nick on Substack Follow Nick on X







 

Let’s imagine this: a landlord in Southwark rents out a house in Dulwich — smart postcode, nice street — but forgets one small detail: the law.

No selective licence, no application, no declaration.

If you or I did that, Southwark Council would hammer us with civil penalties, public naming and shaming, or worse — a Rent Repayment Order forcing us to hand back up to a year’s rent.

But what if that house belonged to someone in the Cabinet? Say, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who sets the taxes you pay — and the housing laws you would be compelled by law to follow.

Would she face the same rules, or would it all quietly “go away” like a missing licence in a well-connected postcode? This may depend on whether other tenants in Southwark, not just Rachel’s, check their own landlord’s position - and take action if they are find out (see below how) they are unlicensed.

Because the council might just be able to cover up for Rachel if she is the (alleged) offender. But if other landlords are also guilty, they will have to enforce the law agaist them, and if they do that they simply cannot let Rachel off the hook.

That would either force her to resign. leave Starmer having to sack her, or put yet another huge hole in the Bad Ship Labour. And, just remember, a couple more of those and it will sink, with almost all hands going down with it.

Here’s the Legal Crux

Under Southwark Council’s selective licensing scheme, every landlord must register, pay a fee, and meet strict safety standards — or face the music.

If they don’t, tenants can strike back. It’s called a Rent Repayment Order (RRO) — and it’s one of the most powerful tools in the tenant’s arsenal.

Even if you’ve already moved out, you can apply through the First-tier Tribunal to reclaim rent — yes, your rent — if your landlord didn’t have the right licence.
That’s not “radical”; it’s the law, as enthusiastically promoted by Rachel Reeves in her Leeds constituency.

So, here’s a question for the Chancellor: If a Southwark tenant made such an allegation, would you welcome an RRO application against your own property?

Let’s face it — if anyone else failed to follow the rules, they’d be fined, humiliated, or sued for every penny of rent they took.

So, if you rent in Southwark — especially Dulwich, Camberwell, or Peckham — check the register. If your landlord hasn’t got a licence, you could be sitting on a small fortune.

Here’s a clear summary:

When is a licence required

Under Part 2 and 3 of the Housing Act 2004, some rented homes require a licence:

  • Mandatory HMO licence – for larger Houses in Multiple Occupation (5+ people, 2+ households).

  • Additional licensing – for smaller HMOs, where the council has chosen to extend licensing.

  • Selective licensing – where the council designates an area (often for single-family lets) where all landlords must have a licence.

If the landlord doesn’t have a licence

It’s a criminal offence to rent a property that needs a licence without holding one.
Consequences can include:

  • civil penalty of up to £30,000, or prosecution.

  • Rent Repayment Order (RRO) — tenants (or the council) can apply to the First-tier Tribunal to reclaim up to 12 months’ rent paid during the unlicensed period.

  • The landlord cannot serve a valid Section 21 notice (no-fault eviction) while unlicensed.

Rent Repayment Order (RRO)

Tenants can apply directly to the Tribunal — no need for the council to do it first.

To succeed, tenants only need to show:

  1. The property required a licence (under selective or HMO rules).

  2. The landlord did not have one at the time.

  3. They paid rent during that unlicensed period.

    The Tribunal can order up to 12 months’ rent to be repaid (less if the landlord has since licensed, or if tenants behaved antisocially, etc).

Key legal references

  • Housing Act 2004, sections 72 (HMOs) and 95 (selective licensing).

  • Housing and Planning Act 2016, sections 40–44 (expanding RRO rights).

  • Tribunal case examples:

    • Parker v Waller (2021) — full 12 months’ rent repaid under selective licensing breach.

    • Goldsborough v CA Property Management Ltd (2020) — RRO upheld even if landlord later got licence.

London Borough of Southwark The selective licensing was expanded in November 2023 to cover a larger number of wards.

Enforcement options: if a landlord / letting agent has failed to license, that can be used as part of a regulatory complaint, or to support claims for rent repayment or penalty fines. Having evidence of the breach (lack of licence, failure to apply) strengthens case.

Maps of selective licensing anybody can check

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/housing/private-tenants-and-landlords/private-rented-property-licensing/property-licensing-3

The Covid Lockdowns Planted The Seeds Of Our Restoration

 

How The Covid Lockdowns Planted The Seeds Of Our Restoration


We can all sense that something big is on the horizon. We aren’t sure when or what, but that feeli

ng is there in our gut. It’s like a persistent hum beneath the surface of daily life or an awareness that the world as we know it is tilting. This is the collective intuition of a people realizing that the foundations we were told were unshakable were, in fact, built on sand. I can’t pinpoint exactly when this feeling started, but if I had to guess I’d say sometime during the Covid years.

Looking back that era feels like a collective fever dream. The surreal images of masked faces, empty streets, and the incessant, fear-driven directives from on high have a hazy, nightmarish quality. Society seems to have entered into an unspoken agreement to pretend it was all a bizarre anomaly, a temporary glitch in the system best left unexamined.

But it did happen and in many ways, we should be thankful that it did.

The great service of that period was the complete and total unmasking of the ruling regime. Their performance of care and concern for public health was, for anyone paying attention, a transparent veneer over a deep disdain for our people. Their actions revealed a priority for control, compliance, and the preservation of their own power structures over the genuine well-being, liberty, and very lives of the people they claim to serve. The arbitrary rules, the blatant hypocrisy of the elites, and the ruthless suppression of dissent ripped away the final shreds of legitimacy from our managerial class. We all saw them for what they are.

Yet, the more significant, long-term consequence of those years—particularly during the lockdowns—was not what they did to us, but what they forced us to do for ourselves. Stripped of our normal routines, social circles, and distractions, millions of us were suddenly left with an abundance of the most dangerous commodity to any corrupt establishment: time to think.

With this time, people discovered truths that have long been hidden from public view. They began to question the official narrative not just on virology, but on everything. They researched history that had been carefully edited out of textbooks. They discovered thinkers who had been relegated to the fringe not because their ideas were weak, but because they were too powerful for the establishment to contend with. They connected dots on geopolitics, finance, and media manipulation that painted a picture far removed from the one presented on the evening news.

Communities formed in the digital trenches, sharing forbidden knowledge and building a new consensus based on truth rather than an “official” narrative. People who had never before questioned the world around them began to see the strings being pulled and more importantly who was doing the pulling.

We are only now beginning to see the first fruits of the seeds planted during that time. The widespread distrust in institutions, the rejection of globalist agendas, and the renewed hunger for authenticity, sovereignty, and rooted identity are all direct harvests from that planting. The uneasy feeling we all share in our guts is the vibration of that new growth pushing against the old, rotten foundations.

It is the sound of a paradigm shifting.

Once your learn the truth about something you cannot force your mind to unsee it. This is the true power of the “red pill.” It’s not just the acquisition of a new fact, but the fundamental rewiring of perception. You begin to see the patterns everywhere: in the way history is framed, the way news is spun, the way language itself is weaponized to obscure reality. The constant drip of propaganda no longer hypnotizes you; it reveals its mechanics. The emperor has no clothes, and once you’ve seen it, you can’t pretend otherwise.

This is why the Regime fears the awakened mind more than any organized opposition. They can ban platforms, de-bank dissidents, and memory-hole events, but they cannot delete truth that has already been integrated into a person’s mind.

The legacy media, formerly the sole curators of reality, now perform as a hollow priesthood, chanting decrees to a congregation that has already walked out. Their desperate theater with its manufactured outrage, the relentless catastrophizing, the transparent propaganda only hastens this process. Their credibility was the first casualty in this new war, and it is a loss from which there is no recovery.

This schism is now the defining reality of our age, a divide far deeper than the petty clown show of left and right. It is a fundamental break between two irreconcilable visions of humanity.

The ideological framework driving the Global Leviathan finds one of its most coherent expressions in the politicized interpretation of Tikkun Olam—a Jewish term meaning “repair of the world.” In the hands of a deracinated, international elite, it has been weaponized into a universalist dogma. This dogma is not about repair in any organic sense; it is a mandate for dismantling—the dismantling of nations, cultures, and the very structures of natural human belonging.

This worldview, largely promulgated by a powerful segment of global Jewry that holds disproportionate influence in media, finance, and academia, is fundamentally anti-national, anti-traditional, and anti-Christian. It is unmoored from any specific land, people, or inherited tradition because its architects see themselves as citizens of nowhere, and thus managers of everywhere. Their vision is one of total abstraction: human beings as interchangeable economic and social units, a global population of consumers and subjects rather than a collective of distinct peoples, each with their own cultures, histories, and destinies.

This is why the Leviathan is hostile to all competing organic forms of identity. Strong, independent nations with deep ethnic and cultural roots are a threat to its project of homogenized control. The traditional family—the fundamental cell of any healthy society—is targeted for deconstruction because it creates loyalties that transcend the state and the market. Biblical Christianity, with its eternal truths and command to “come out from among them and be separate,” represents a direct theological and philosophical opposition to this borderless, materialist creed.

The morality of this system is a fluid and ever-shifting code designed to produce perpetual guilt, especially among Western nations and the White majority. This guilt is not a path to redemption but a tool for dissolution. It’s a way to make a people ashamed of their heritage, distrustful of their own instincts, and willing participants in their own replacement. The sacrament of this creed is degradation: the glorification of the abnormal, the desecration of the sacred, and the celebration of weakness, all in the name of a false compassion that masks a deep-seated contempt for human excellence and virtue.

Their god is efficiency. It’s a cold, utilitarian calculus that values profit, control, and social engineering over beauty, truth, and the soul of a people. Its promised land is a homogenized, borderless world, scrubbed clean of the messy particularities of history, faith, and blood—in their minds a world without conflict because it would be a world without anything left worth fighting for.

Standing against this is the growing resistance of those who have awakened to what is being lost. This is not merely a political stance but a cultural and spiritual defense of reality itself. It is the understanding that true “repair of the world” does not come from erasing the created order but from honoring it by strengthening families, upholding tradition, preserving heritage, and building resilient communities rooted in place and faith. The conflict of our age is between those who seek to impose a rootless, artificial world and those fighting to protect and renew the organic, God-given world of nations, families, and souls. The outcome will determine whether the future holds mere management or meaning, control or communion.

The “something” on the horizon is the inevitable collision of these two forces. It is the death rattle of a decaying system and the arduous birth of a new one. The feeling in our gut is the quiet confidence of the builder watching the demolition of a condemned structure. There is dust, noise, and danger, but beyond it lies the promise of a cleared foundation on which to build something stronger, truer, and more permanent. We are not waiting for a political savior; we are becoming the men and women who will roll up our sleeves and rebuild, guided by the truths we found when the world fell silent.

The old world is dying because it is built on a lie, namely the lie of human sameness. It insists that a man is an island, a blank slate defined only by his choices, and that all cultures, traditions, and peoples are interchangeable widgets in the global machine. This lie is collapsing under the weight of its own absurdity. You cannot decree that men and women are the same, that children need no mother and father, that a nation is a mere idea, without facing the catastrophic consequences: collapsing birth rates, spiritual despair, and social atomization.

The lockdowns forced a confrontation with biology itself. As the state tried to legislate against natural human connection by forbidding family gatherings, shutting down churches, isolating the elderly it revealed the fundamental weakness of its ideological project. You cannot ultimately defeat human nature. The innate need for community, for shared purpose rooted in kinship and faith, reasserted itself with a vengeance during the lockdowns. People didn’t just find “conspiracy theories”; they rediscovered eternal truths about who they are and where they come from.

This is why the conflict is so bitter. It is not a polite debate. The globalist regime knows it cannot win the argument on merit, so it resorts to sheer force. It will use every lever of institutional power—the corporate media, the financial system, the judicial machinery—to punish and silence the noticing. They will call you every name in the book, not because the names are true, but because they are the last weapons left in a depleted arsenal. Their hysteria is a symptom of their fear. They see the shadows of the future growing longer, and they know their time is short.

But a new parallel society is already forming in the shell of the old. It exists in the homeschooling co-ops, the local agricultural networks, the dissident tech platforms, and the churches that never closed their doors. This is not a political movement in the conventional sense; it is a quiet exodus. It is families choosing to opt out of the degradation, to build resilient communities centered on faith, family, and folk. They are storing up real knowledge, practical skills, and social capital, preparing for the day when the brittle edifice of the current system finally gives way.

The horizon we sense is not a single event, but a process of separation. The two worlds cannot coexist indefinitely. One is built on sand: on debt, deception, and demographic suicide. The other is being built on the rock of reality. The coming period will be one of great trial, as the old order lashes out in its death throes. But the outcome is not in doubt. Reality always wins.

The task for those who see clearly is not to win an online argument or an election cycle. The task is to build. To have more children. To teach them the true history of their people. To create networks of mutual aid and defense. To be a beacon of stability and sanity in a world gone mad. The seeds planted during the lockdowns are now taking root. The feeling in our gut is the quiet, steady hum of growth. We are not waiting for the storm to pass. We are learning to thrive in the rain, knowing that it is washing away the filth of a corrupt age and preparing the ground for a great renewal.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King