While some ethno-nationalists are wasting their time with a glittering chunk of Fools’ Gold (see my earlier piece below) their civic counterparts are waving a silver-painted Turd on a Stick - ‘Integration’.
“Immigration isn’t a problem”, according to the civnats, “it’s the failure of so many of them to integrate into our society. We need to slow down immigration, and to pick those we allow in more carefully, then all the newcomers would turn out just like us and we’d all live happily ever after.”
The two fantasies - Integration and Remigration - are unrealistic wishful thinking, but they are wrong in totally different ways. One is a Bad Idea which could happen. The other is a Good Idea which won’t happen.
The problem with Remigration is not that it is undesirable in principle, but that it is not going to happen on a scale anything like large enough to stop us becoming minorities in our own homelands. The problem with Integration is that, if it happened, it would mean that, rather than being a minority, our people would eventually simply cease to be.
Both are damn fool fantasies, and they are both wasting time and energy which need to go into preparing our peoples for the reality of the future. But, of the two, integration is by far the worst because, if it happened, it would destroy us.
Trust in remigration is the error of good people who mean chose a path to ethnic salvation which is in fact a time-wasting mirage. They are wrong, but they mean well. Trust in integration is an optical illusion promoted by bad people who want to destroy us and ours completely.
Every step towards integration is another step closer to the implementation of what is most succinctly termed the Kalergi Plan. The intended end result - desired and pushed for by several different - though often interlocked - vested interests, is miscegenation on such a scale that the free, and potentially rebellious, white nations of the world are replaced by populations of raceless, rootless helots. The servants, playthings and victims of a small caste of eternal masters.
Of course, those advocating this ethno-cultural assisted suicide scheme don’t present it like that. Integration is instead ‘sold’ as the way by which we retain or regain control of our own countries and our own destiny. What is also never explained is how - even if we could find immigrants who would behave and become like us - this would in some way stop them replacing us.
Indeed, the most dangerous thing about ‘integration’ is that the more it is achieved, the more it encourages miscegenation.
Now, if we were 95% of the population, there would at least be an argument for saying that integration and racial mxing would ‘do away’ with the problem of immigration by the process of swamping them with our own genes as well as our culture. The elders of Britain’s post-war West Indian communities used to complain about this very process, which they called ‘whiting out’.
Racial purists will, of course be horrified by the suggestion but, don’t worry, iin reality it’s not even on the table - because the situation is already way too far gone for that to work.
We are not 95% of the population. We - the white peoples of the world - are no more than 8% of the global population. And, in our own countries, our offspring make up perhaps an average of two-thirds of all the children. This, furthermore, is a proportion which is falling rapidly, as our institutionally anti-white political and economic elites continue to flood our countries with Third World immigrants (most of them ‘legally’).
Integration - another damn fool idea
Under these circumstances, integration is not a way by which to assimilate immigrants into our population, it is a way to disintegrate our ethnic and cultural identities into the genocideal liberal melting pot.
When you’re an ageing 8% of the world’s population, assimilation is not the path to salvatin, it’s the road to Hell. Burn this equation into your mind, eart and soul: Integration = Annihilation.
So, since Integration is arguably possible, but disastrous, and Remigration is disastrously impossible, what is the answer?
In a word, segregation. For reasons I have explained earlier here on Substack, we’re not going to see the back of our uninvited guests any time soon. We will quite quickly be able to stop calling them ‘minorities’, because we'll all be ‘minorities’.
If we are to make this new social arrangement work, we are the ones who need to change the most. Which is just as well, because we have precisely that capacity. Indeed, the retribalisation of our peoples advanced faster in 2025 than in all the previous decades since the beginning pf the ghastly ‘multi-racial experiment’ put together.
The idea that millions of people from very different races and cultures would simply become English, or Irish, or French or Swedes, was always a total non-starter. There is nothing magical about our air or soil which can turn Africans into Scotsmen or Turks into Germans. It’s just not going to happen.
The very best we can hope for - if our people continue to wake up and get their acts together - is that we, the indigenous creators of our homelands, become the indispensible ethno-religious-cultural core, the national pole around which all the ‘Others’ revolve.
I have spoken to Muslim Syrians who told me that it was the significant minority Christian presence in their country which used to act as the glue that held their potential fractious society of less tolerant minorities together. Whether that’s tue or not I don’t know for sure, but the idea offers a bit of hope.
Not as much, of course, as the proposal that our peoples, by dint of their indigenous status, organisational ability, high average intelligence, true Christian values and potential for systematic sadistic violence, come to form such formidible community blocks that all th others decide that we are not to be messed with.
Bear in mind that most of them came here because they’d rather not be there, and that this was primarily because we had stopped running things there but still ran things here. Accordingly, it is perhaps not too unrealistic to hope that we may reinvent ourselves as the guardians and guarantors of stability and decency.
But to do that, we need to maintain our blood lines, culture and numbers as the largest minority. Which is why integration and assimilation will remain such dangerous concepts.
Rather than calling on the Others to adopt our ways, we need need them therefore to accept that our ways underpin the whole of society. We don’t want them to become like us, we simply need them to accept that a society based on us and our values in a better society not just for us, but also for them.
As I said, that’s the best we can now realistically get. Failing that, then the only good news is that the community building and attitudes we need to inculcate in our future generations to fit them for that best scenario will also equip them to survive in the event that the worst comes to pass.
Indeed, if you are one of those readers who still insists on hoping against hope that ‘remigration’ is possible, you should reflect on the question of which sort of white communities will be best placed to help it happen. Those led by people who have spent several decades assuring everyone that, one day, a bunch of political knights in shining armour will ride in to put things right?
Or those led by people who have worked on the basis that there are no magic wands and no knights in shining armour, and who therefore devote themselves to setting up structures and parallel institutions which instill in our people a strong sense of identity, unity and a willingness to stand up and fight for their rights?
If you appreciate Nicks work, but aren’t yet ready to become a subscriber on Substack, perhaps you’d feel good at least buying me a coffee. “Many a mickle maks a muckle”, as my ancestors on my fairly remote Scottish side would have said. Thank you! “Buy Me a Coffee” HERE
