Search This Blog

Sunday, 9 August 2026

Green Lies and Deceptive Science a Christian & Realistic View Repost and edit

By Horwich Strawman 

Ever wonder if we are being played by global elites using junk science to keep us in fear? Look at the Club of Rome, an ultra-wealthy think-tank rubbing shoulders with the UN. They openly admitted to hunting for a common enemy to force humanity to unite, proudly landing on the idea that pollution, global warming, and water shortages would perfectly fit the bill. Even elite academics and politicians have explicitly tipped their hands. Take Stanford Professor 


Steven Schneider, who openly mused that to capture the public's imagination, scientists have to serve up terrifying, oversimplified scenarios while burying their own doubts—forcing each researcher to balance being effective against being honest. Or look at former Canadian Environment Minister Christine Stewart, who flatly stated that even if the science of global warming is entirely phony, it provides the ultimate golden opportunity to completely restructure world power and wealth.

The Real Story: Natural Cycles and Forced Amesia
Why are we acting like a changing climate is a modern invention when the year 1000 AD was demonstrably warmer than today? Legendary atmospheric physicists have proved that the Earth continuously warms and cools in ancient, abrupt, and completely unstoppable cycles driven by changes in the sun. What we are seeing today looks less like objective science and more like classic psychological conditioning. It mirrors the old Soviet mind-control tactics exposed by Edward Hunter, where the language of science and evangelism is hijacked and twisted to make a manufactured narrative palatable. Even the ancient words of Job ask a biting question to arrogant humanity: who is this that darkens counsel with words without knowledge, and where were you when the foundations of the Earth were actually laid?
Look at the hilarious irony of the Copenhagen global warming summit ending with a record-breaking freeze that buried Europe in snow. While global managers scrambled to cover up the explosive Climategate scandal—which exposed their fraudulent data to the world—nature gave us a cold blast of reality. How can we trust leaders who swap their integrity for a conspiracy designed to choke our freedoms? When their grand plans fail publicly, they just retreat behind closed doors to plot their next moves toward global control, helped along by political puppets and UN bureaucrats begging for a little more time to dictate policy.
Erasing the Past to Control the Present
The sheer scale of this deception is jaw-dropping. Did you know a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator manually rewrote climate history, doctored over 5,000 unique articles, and literally erased the Medieval Warm Period online because climate insiders saw it as a massive roadblock to their agenda? They desperately needed to delete the historical records to make their modern charts look terrifying.
They scream about a scientific consensus, yet Al Gore's apocalyptic claims that Greenland's ice will melt and raise oceans by twenty feet are pure science fiction. Actual unadulterated facts show that Greenland’s ice mass and its polar bear populations have actually grown. When Norwegian Vikings settled Greenland a millennium ago, it was genuinely green and perfect for farming, until a natural shift triggered the Little Ice Age and froze them out. Back then, long before anyone could blame SUVs for a warm day, the Atlantic coasts weren't swallowed by rising oceans because nature naturally handles warmer cycles through evaporation.
More than 17,000 real American scientists, meteorologists, and oceanographers have boldly rebelled against this forced consensus, proving that 20th-century carbon dioxide has caused zero deleterious climate effects and has actually accelerated global plant growth. Yet the mainstream media remains completely deaf to rational voices. They treat Al Gore’s eco-philosophy not as science, but as a dogmatic, earth-centred religion demanding our absolute spiritual submission. If this pan-religious global agenda is really about blending ancient pantheism with modern political control, aren't we just trading our hard-won liberties for a totally engineered emergency?  
our relationship to the earth, offering a rich tapestry of ideas that claim all things are interconnected like the blood that unites us all. He even laments that the spiritual sense of our place in nature, which can be traced right back to the dawn of human civilisation, was somehow ruined when organised goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity. To bolster this earth-centred spirituality, he regularly points to ancient Eastern dictums declaring the Earth as our mother and all of us as her children.
To force this eco-spirituality onto the masses, Al Gore demands a central organising principle that everyone must voluntarily agree to. He openly warns that minor shifts in policy or moderate improvements in laws are nothing more than forms of appeasement, designed to trick the public into believing that sacrifice, struggle, and a total, wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary. But how do you get the public to consent to a wrenching transformation? The elite members of the Club of Rome knew the answer perfectly: you need a massive, terrifying crisis. Local environmental issues like a polluted river or industrial waste simply are not scary enough to capture the global imagination. You need a sensationalised, borderless monster like global warming to truly terrify the world into submission.
The Radical Roots of Green Politics
To understand the raw politics and persuasive propaganda driving this movement, you only have to look at the social ambitions that birthed it. The entire green agenda was cooked up during the sixties when four anti-establishment groups merged to form the Green Party in Germany: radical feminists, new-left Marxists, anti-war peacenicks, and hippies chasing spiritual enlightenment. Is it any coincidence that they chose Vladimir Lenin’s actual birthday to celebrate Earth Day?
Militant American greens quickly adopted the exact same playbook, pushing for radical population control, a global welfare system to replace capitalism with socialism, planetary governance with national disarmament, and earth-centered pantheism. The overlap explains exactly why Marxism and earth-worship saturate modern environmentalism. Look at the chilling reality that William Reilly, a former head of the Environmental Protection Agency, openly dismissed private land ownership as a quaint anachronism, while pushing to gut constitutional property protections so the government could seize private land with ease.
The undisputed ringleader of this global circus for the past three decades has been Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong. Operating behind the scenes, Strong has controlled the UN Environmental Programme, directed massive global summits, and co-chaired the World Economic Forum. As a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and a member of the Club of Rome, he oversaw the drafting of the UN Earth Charter—an international contract housed in a literal Ark of Hope. If the public buys into this charter, its sweeping regulations will completely override and replace the rights granted by national constitutions.
The Earth Charter dramatically proclaims that we stand at a critical moment in history where humanity must choose its future through a new sense of global interdependence. It boldly states that fundamental changes are needed in our values, institutions, and ways of living. This global contract completely clashes with traditional values, demanding a total shift in human behaviour to enforce a unified, compliant human family.
Censorship and the Weaponisation of National Security
Achieving this grand global purpose requires more than just doomsday propaganda; it demands absolute censorship to silence anyone who dares to look at the facts. In the UK, environmental fervour has bordered on pure fanaticism. Elite scientific institutions have thrown their massive weight behind unproven global warming theories, ensuring that any scientist skeptical of the narrative is denied academic jobs and completely cut off from university funding. Some radicals have even demanded that denying climate change be made a criminal offence, treating it on par with Holocaust denial. As a result, heavy-handed laws are slipping onto the books, penalising everyday households for crimes against nature.
The rest of the world is following right along. Under the deceptive banner of Sustainable Development or Smart Growth, a massive web of regulatory agencies is quietly implementing a total UN takeover of water, land, food, and housing. They bypass elected lawmakers entirely, but when they do use the legislature, the tactics are terrifying. Proposed bills have attempted to tie climate change directly to national security, forcing the military and intelligence agencies to run war games based on global warming. By framing the weather as a national defence issue, globalist politicians make it almost impossible for anyone to debate or ignore their agenda.
The Crushing Weight of Contrary Evidence
Meanwhile, the actual scientific evidence against man-made global warming is completely overwhelming. Real-world experiments have confirmed that cosmic rays significantly influence the planet's cloud cover. During periods of high electromagnetic activity from the sun, these rays are deflected, clouds decrease, and direct solar radiation naturally warms the Earth. The past, both recent and geological, has seen massive, rapid, and entirely natural shifts in temperature long before industrialisation. Any onset of warmer temperatures is driven by these powerful celestial forces, not human existence.

Thursday, 6 August 2026

Tech Moguls PRepare for Doomsday Nick Griffin Show number 2 Aug 2026

 

Nick Griffin's latest look at the big issues of the week. Including another chunk of "Should Have Listened to Nick"
The video, titled "Tech Moguls Prepare for Doomsday", features a political commentary by host Nick Griffin, former leader of the British National Party (BNP) (0:00).
The broadcast covers the following core topics:
1. Billionaire "Apocalypse Insurance"
Griffin focuses a significant portion of the video on claims that prominent tech industry executives and billionaires are actively preparing for societal or global collapse (1:25). He frames this as hypocrisy, arguing that these figures publicly promote the prosperity of technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) while secretly investing in disaster preparedness (1:45). Individual cases mentioned include:
  • Mark Zuckerberg: Alleged construction of a large underground compound with independent food and energy supplies in Kauai, Hawaii (4:08).
  • Peter Thiel: Attempts to build estate housing and luxury survival lodges in New Zealand, which Griffin notes have faced local planning restrictions (6:16).
  • Sam Altman: Statements regarding personal preparedness stockpiles, including items like emergency medical supplies and defense equipment (9:37).
  • Jeff Bezos & Reid Hoffman: Generic investments in high-end security properties and "apocalypse insurance" concepts (7:49).
2. Criticisms of AI Capabilities
The host recounts several personal anecdotes using Meta AI on WhatsApp to argue that current consumer AI models are fundamentally flawed and "moronic" (20:28). He details errors made by the system regarding local geographic knowledge of the Bristol Channel, basic map orientation, specifying compatible electronic adapters for hardware setups, and a failure to accurately pixelate or mask faces in family photographs (21:59). Griffin expresses concern that automated systems with this level of functional error could cause major disasters by mistake if granted operational authority over critical infrastructure (32:04).
3. Energy Policies and Thorium Nuclear Power
Griffin highlights China's operational opening of a thorium-based molten salt nuclear reactor in the Gobi Desert (39:19). He uses this milestone to argue that Western nations wasted decades of foundational research while investing heavily in a "gigantic welfare state" (40:05). He asserts that the BNP correctly anticipated the viability of thorium power in the early 2000s and claims that if his party's policies had been adopted, the UK would be an independent global energy leader today instead of relying on green technologies (42:33).
4. Nationalist and Civil Rights Rhetoric
The video transitions in its latter half to address global demographic trends and nationalist political positions (43:49). Griffin displays a global population map to argue that declining birth rates represent a "civilizational" emergency (43:55). He concludes with an excerpt from a 2007 speech delivered at a BNP summer festival (48:05). In this archival footage, he heavily criticizes the political establishment, standard immigration policies, and mainstream media outlets (50:52). He frames the contemporary nationalist movement not merely as a political stance, but as a "civil rights struggle" for the native population of the British Islands (52:09).
🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍
https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5397979710160896

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

Wildfires, Wild Lies and 75 Immigrants I Want The Nick Griffin Show Aug 2026

 

Latest Nick Griffin Take on the Week's Big Issues https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/w...

Saturday, 1 August 2026

When a Government Wants To Silence And Betray Its Own People

 When a Government Wants To Silence And Betray Its Own People


By Horwich Strawman

When a government wants to stop and silence its own people from complaining about massive changes like mass immigration, it does not usually ban protests out loud. Instead, the traitorous ruling group passes clever laws that slowly take away the right to speak up. A great example of this is how the UK government used the Race Relations Acts of 1965 and 1968. 

On paper, these laws were supposed to keep the peace and stop discrimination. But in reality, they gave the state a handy tool to shut down any local people who complained about the country changing too fast. By making it a crime to stir up hatred, the politicians created a very vague rule that they could use against anyone pointing out the massive downside of open borders.

This brings us to Enoch Powell and his famous warning back in April 1968. Powell saw exactly what was coming and spoke out to conservative activists in Birmingham about how unchecked immigration would split the country into divided groups. In his actual speech, he famously quoted the Roman poet Virgil, warning that he filled with foreboding and seemed to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood. Powell explained that the native citizens felt like strangers in their own country as they found their wives unable to get hospital beds in childbirth and their children unable to obtain school places. He warned that passing new race relations laws would simply provide legal weapons to silence the majority. The elite did not listen to his warnings about communal fragmentation, and instead, they kicked him out of the shadow cabinet. Looking at Britain today, it is clear that his predictions about deep social division were right on the money. The elite did not stop the mass migration, they just doubled down on making laws to silence anyone who agreed with Powell's warnings.
Decades after Powell, further warnings were repeatedly sounded by the British National Party and its leader Nick Griffin, who argued that the political establishment was actively engineering the demographic replacement of the native population. Griffin and his party constantly warned that the mainstream parties were hiding the true scale of immigration to avoid a public backlash. They predicted that the relentless influx would completely overwhelm public services, bankrupt local councils, and trigger severe cultural friction in towns across the nation. The party warned that the elite would eventually turn to total state censorship and aggressive policing to keep a lid on the resulting social unrest. Just like before, the ruling class did not address these warnings about the country reaching a breaking point. Instead, they weapanised the legal system and state broadcasting to systematically ban, deplatform, and criminalise the party's leadership, proving that the elite would ruthlessly suppress any organised political resistance to protect their open borders agenda.
Today, this institutional defensive wall has turned into a blatant two tier justice system in the UK. This means there is one set of strict rules for the native population and a completely different, softer set of rules for everyone else. We see real life examples of this bias in different court sentences, which critics say proves that justice is no longer blind. During public disturbances, indigenous British citizens who get angry about immigration or simply post aggressive comments online face swift judicial prosecution and are locked up with massive, multi year prison sentences. For instance, ordinary individuals have received sentences of up to three years in prison just for writing angry words on social media apps or calling for protests outside migrant hotels. Meanwhile, a completely different standard is applied to non indigenous individuals and left wing activists who engage in far more dangerous rhetoric. A stark example of this double standard occurred when a non indigenous activist and political figure was caught on video at a mass rally loudly telling a cheering crowd that his political opponents were disgusting Nazi fascists and that people needed to cut all their throats and get rid of them all, while running his finger across his throat in a slicing gesture. Even though this explicit call for violence was fully recorded and widely viewed by millions on social media, the individual was ultimately cleared in court and let off completely scot free, an outcome that opposition politicians and native citizens called absolutely astonishing and alarming. This shocking contrast, where native citizens are jailed for years over online remarks while a minority political figure is entirely excused for publicly urging people to slit throats, stands as undeniable proof for many that the authorities regularly practice institutional appeasement toward favored groups while treating the host population with total severity. The system uses full force against its own citizens to protect the elites political plans, while letting favored groups get away with breaking the law.
To make sure nobody can stop them, the state uses sneaky legal words to give themselves emergency powers. They pass public order laws using fuzzy terms like serious disruption or public nuisance so they can shut down a protest whenever they feel like it. If a group of local people tries to stand up for their rights, the state just labels them a threat to the community and uses these powers to freeze bank accounts, track phones, and stop people from meeting up.
This oppression has heavily expanded into the digital world, where social media apps are now forced by the government to delete posts from local protesters. Under modern speech regulations like the Communications Act, the police make dozens of arrests every single day just for offensive online messages. Hard evidence from custody records obtained by journalists shows the true scale of this digital crackdown, with official figures revealing that police forces make around 12,000 arrests a year under Section 127 of the Communications Act and the Malicious Communications Act. This translates to a shocking average of 33 arrests every single day just for online comments, a number that represents an almost 58 percent rise in speech-related detentions since the pre-pandemic era. Civil liberties groups have strongly condemned these numbers, warning that the state is actively over-policing the internet and using broad, vague speech offences to systematically wipe out dissent. Tech corporations are threatened with massive fines unless their automatic algorithms quickly wipe out content that questions official immigration statistics or criticises state policy. If a native citizen tries to share videos of a protest or complain about two tier policing on apps like X or Facebook, the platforms are forced to ban the accounts and hand over user data to the authorities. This digital clampdown ensures that the native population cannot even talk to each other about what is happening to their neighbourhoods. 
To bypass this intense state-enforced digital censorship, alternative media platforms have become an essential battleground for those trying to publish forbidden viewpoints. Dissident journalists, independent commentators, and native advocacy groups have been forced to migrate away from mainstream providers towards alternative spaces like Telegram, Rumble, and encrypted networks. These alternative networks intentionally build their servers outside the immediate legal reach of Western governments, allowing users to share raw, unedited footage of mass immigration protests and highlight instances of double-standard policing that the evening news refuses to broadcast. Because the establishment cannot easily force these alternative companies to delete posts or hand over user data, the state frequently responds by smearing these entire networks as breeding grounds for extremism and threatening to block domestic access to the applications altogether.
This kind of behaviour actually breaks international law, which is supposed to protect the rights of native peoples everywhere. International groups always say that indigenous populations have a right to keep their culture, protect their land, and have a real say in how their country changes. But the political elite simply ignore these international rules. They do not care about getting the consent of the people who already live there, and they use domestic laws to crush any local resistance.
History shows us that this is an old trick. Strong governments have always passed anti protest laws to control native populations and force them to accept massive changes. By looking at how the UK used the Race Relations Acts, how social media is heavily policed, how alternative media is targeted, and how the justice system operates today, it is easy to see the pattern. The law is no longer there to protect ordinary citizens. Instead, the elite have turned it into a weapon to force mass immigration on the country while legally gagging anyone who tries to stop them. As I have always warned myself. Beware of the sophistry of tolerance and inclusion. They are the Trojan Horse of the Traitors.