All mainstream media networks leap on global warming fearmongering

All mainstream media networks  leap on global warming fear mongering after IPCC report release;  No dissenting views allowed Sunday, October , 2013 by: J. D. Heyes

Man-made, man-produced carbon dioxide is filling up the atmosphere, heating it to unsustainable temperatures that will ultimately melt the polar ice caps and flood the world.

That's the latest fear-mongering "report" from the United Nations' International Panel on Climate Change. Only, none of that is true, as other climatologists and experts, including those at NASA, reported as early as a few years ago [See also: http://www.naturalnews.com].

Of course, none of this makes much difference to the alarmist mainstream media, most of which has bought into and reported verbatim disproven nonsense regarding nonexistent global warming crises that is still being espoused from people like former Vice President Al Gore, whose own predictions of melting polar caps have been seriously debunked [http://www.naturalnews.com].

The mainstream media is still breathlessly reporting the lie

In response to the latest junk science reporting by the IPCC, the big networks and many of the cable news outlets breathlessly reported the coming end of the world. Indeed, the Media Research Center (MRC) notes that CBS News even aired a claim that temps had risen "more than 200 degrees" (a figure not conducive to life on this planet).

Per MRC:

Predictably, the evening news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC Sept. 27 repeated the IPCC's dire warnings without including any skeptics and without mentioning past failures such as their inability to accurately predict warming or sea level rise.

ABC's "World News with Diane Sawyer," NBC "Nightly News" and CBS "Evening News" all failed to include criticism of the IPCC with the exception of a swipe against "skeptics" on ABC. NBC continued to link weather events like Hurricane Sandy to climate change while CBS aired a statistic that one scientist called "meaningless."

The words "Big Warning" glaring on screen, ABC News said the report was "landmark," and that it came from "top scientists." Reporter Dan Harris went on to talk about events like superstorm Sandy, warning ominously that the "UN report says we will be seeing much more of these kinds of things in the coming decades as a result of climate change...." But of course, hasn't the IPCC been saying such things for years? Yes.

Harris acknowledged that others had differing viewpoints on the subject, but he immediately tore into them, mockingly saying that "skeptics have predictably accused the UN panel of being alarming, but Princeton climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer, who is on the panel, says this is a major wake-up call."

Yeah, about that Oppenheimer. He's been accused of engaging in activist junk science by other scientists, according to meteorologist Anthony Watts' website. Only, Harris didn't bother to mention that.

Changing the language to continue the false narrative

In addition to the tons of evidence that now exists debunking this stuff, there are other rather obvious things that should tip you off that the "global warming" crowd is full of it.

First off, why do they keep changing the language? For years the big scare was "global warming." When that wouldn't work, these alarmists changed it to "climate change." Now, it's morphing into "climate disruption." And all of this after the "global cooling" scares of the 1970s.

Further, since the hard data show that global warming hasn't really progressed over the past 15 years, wouldn't you think that guys like Gore and all the scientists and climatologists on the IPCC would be happy? But they're not; they're just as miserable and as dire as always. And their shtick hasn't changed one iota: "The world is still going to be swallowed up by the seas! I swear!"

Heck, if I were them, I would have come out and taken credit for being part of the global warning movement that saved the planet - but they're not doing that either. They are simply doubling down on the alarming nonsense.

It is painfully obvious now to all but the most ardent zealots that global warming/climate change is a sham. But you won't hear the mainstream media giving much coverage to the proof.

The Revolution has failed. Tear it down and start over Again.

 

The Revolution has failed. Tear it down and start over.

, 2013

by Brett Stevens.

Around 1500 A.D. it became popular to think that we, the people, were oppressed by institutions like religion and kings, and if we just overthrew those, we’d reach a new Utopia.
Fast forward a half-millennium and it’s clear that not only is that not true, but also your society falls apart if you adopt these crazy ideas. What caused people to chase this crazy?
I’d suggest neurosis, or a confusion of cause and effect. It is always with us, and it’s why thinking used to be considered work. Then people came along who trivialized thinking and called it intellectualism, which is the process of looking at tiny correlations and deriving big metaphors from them.
The fact is that before neurosis, people thought in whole ways. They did not look at details; they looked at the whole. This isn’t big picture or little picture, but both at once. The details fit into the whole. The details were not presumed to be exceptions that debunked the rule and thus required analysis on their own.
Can you see what’s consistent about this thinking?
Whole-thinking does not favor the individual’s need to feel important. In it, we look at how everything fits together, not how one part impacts one person and how interesting that is (like spectators at a tragedy show). The neurosis is confusing the whole with that individual perspective.
This means the Revolution which culminated in 1789 has failed, and not because of external factors. It failed for internal reasons. Like the Edsel or reality television, it was simply a bad design. An unrealistic idea. An idea which didn’t even hold together.
We’re seeing it across the world now. People are currently in a panic because across the West, governments are in debt, ineffective and generally bungling everything. Even worse, citizens are in the grip of a mass delusion which makes them repeat “everyone is equal” like zombies again and again. They can’t think.
As a result, societies are dying not because of a single large factor like peak oil, global warming, war or technology making our jobs obsolete. Societies are dying because they’ve lost internal cohesion. People aren’t having kids. They aren’t doing much beyond the minimum. They are bored, lonely, angry and miserable.
All of this just shows the wisdom of our ancestors. “Liberalism is a dead path,” they said. It was mob rule, they pointed out. That won’t end well. But we tried it, and because disaster didn’t hit immediately, we thought we got away with it.
Two disastrous world wars and the global collapse of our political systems later, we’re starting to get the picture. Do your part — get out there and help tear it down. If it’s part of this social fabric, destroy it. Debunk it. Subvert it. Vandalize it. Overthrow it.
That which is our modern liberal democracy is poison to all that is good. If you love life, you love good things; if that’s true, you will realize that sometimes creation is destruction. This horrible old 1500s neurotic social order needs to burn and we can do it with just a little push where it’s weakest.

Posted in: Socialization.

The Israel Lobby Cowbird / Cuckoo

The Israel Lobby Cowbird

Israel lobbying organizations flit about Washington, hatching operatives into the U.S. federal government to pursue a solitary goal—advancing the interests of a foreign state without the obligation of registering foreign agents or working through properly credentialed diplomats as rest of the flock of nations must.

 

IRMEP
How is the Israel lobby like a swarm of cowbirds?  Cowbirds use the devious strategy of brood parasitism, arriving at the nest of more parentally-oriented birds to lay their own eggs.  Cowbirds then enjoy unburdened freedom to forage and thrive while their own young are raised, fed and protected by unsuspecting parents.  If an avian host dares remove the cowbird’s offspring, the host’s own eggs—if not the entire nest—will likely be destroyed by the watchful cowbird.  This coercive relationship is eerily similar to how Israel lobbying organizations flit about Washington, hatching operatives into the U.S. federal government to pursue a solitary goal—advancing the interests of a foreign state without the obligation of registering foreign agents or working through properly credentialed diplomats as rest of the flock of nations must.

 The sordid and occasionally illegal tactics used by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to intimidate Congress are well-documented.  But what precisely has all of AIPAC’s past nest-destruction bought?
Back when AIPAC got serious about launching economic warfare against Iran, it lobbied the Bush administration to create a new unit in the U.S. Treasury Department.  Into this nest it laid Stuart Levey.  Levey’s only observable qualification was an extreme commitment to Israel under the wing of ultra-Zionist Marty Peretz.  Leadership of this Iran economic warfare unit is now captured roost exclusively for Israel Lobby hatchlings.  Levey’s former law partner David Cohen simply flitted in when Levey departed the nest.
So too the lobby has tumbled out credible and experienced career diplomats and placed former AIPAC research director and AIPAC think tank founder Martin Indyk in charge of the on-going ruse known as the “Israel-Palestine peace process.”  Long on the payroll of Israeli-American media mogul and political operative Haim Saban, watchers have recently observed Indyk preening with his patron before winging off to the latest round of “peace negotiations.”
Perhaps the most secretive and dangerous Israel lobby cowbird policy egg was hatched in the National Security Agency in 2009 during the very months the Obama administration quietly dismissed espionage charges against AIPAC staff.  According to whistleblower Edward Snowden, the wholesale transfer of raw NSA intercepts on American citizens to Israel has been ongoing since that time.  The transfer is”authorized” by official doctrine that “the survival of the state of Israel is a paramount goal of US Middle East policy.”  This prime directive was secret because it is a blank check obligating American blood and treasure to a cause U.S. citizens never approved via any referendum or advise and consent process.  As in so many issues concerning Israel—from the U.S. criminal activities and cover-ups that enabled its clandestine nuclear program to funding for illegal occupation activities—the Israel lobby cowbird diligently rolled the eggs of U.S. interest right out of their federal nests.

Source:  IRMEP

UK Column Live - 9th October 2013

THE OTHER ISRAEL [ A DESTRUCTIVE INFLUENCE

Willie & Phil Robertson talk about fake bleeps and praying in Jesus' name

Porous borders turn Libya into radical sanctuary

Source: DW
Libya has morphed into the Wild West of northern Africa just two years after the fall of the Gadhafi regime. In particular, the Libyan Desert has become a sanctuary for radical forces.
In the middle of nowhere in the Sahara Desert in the town of Isseyen, time seems to stand still. Now that voter registration is over for the upcoming municipal elections, tranquility has returned to the simple offices of the town hall. Visitors only come by for the satellite Internet connection, one of the very few public services provided in this remote area of post-revolution Libya.
But the calm is deceptive. Located southwest of the Tuareg town of Ghat, Isseyen is the last outpost before the Algerian border, a route used to enter the country by smugglers and Tuareg fighters from Mali, including members of AQIM, Al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb.
“I saw al Qaeda vehicles there, but the authorities don’t want to have anything to do with it,” says Hassan Massafer, who belongs to an army unit stationed in Ubari, 400 kilometers further inland.
Locals in Isseyen are skeptical. “Recently there were rumors going around that a heavily armed al Qaeda convoy was moving north. But when we looked into it, it turned out to be a local border patrol,” says tour guide Abishini Aissa, adding that “as soon as people see Tuaregs with turbans they get scared.”
For the people of southern Libya Islamists are not the problem, but rather criminality and turf wars between the drug gangs. “In the desert, it’s the rule of the strongest, but in our communities, it is usually safe because we know each other,” say several residents of Ghat.
Tense security situation
On the other hand, nobody contradicts the general assessment that the security situation in the region is a disaster and that the Libyan authorities have no control over the border region.
Mohamed Abdelkader, the mayor of Ghat, does not beat around the bush when he says, “The borders are wide open. Drugs and weapons flow in and out and the army has no capacity to catch smugglers or extremists.”
An army, in the conventional sense, does not exist in Libya anyway. Out of fear there could be attempts to overthrow him, Gadhafi, when he was alive, kept the army weak. Currently, national security forces are still in the process of being built up. The transitional government chose to incorporate rebel forces into the military in an effort to demobilize revolutionaries. For the fighters – mostly untrained youngsters – this has brought prestige and a government salary, but they are still not capable of dealing with the demands of the job.
“There are not enough men for border guards and patrols. Normally, passports are not even checked,” notes Abdelkader.
Failed security strategies
Furthermore, the national government lacks authority. Most of the former rebels feel obliged to follow the orders of their direct superiors and the interests of their tribe, their clan and their community.
“The way the army was formed was a big mistake,” says Barka Wardougou, who heads the military council in Murzuk in southwestern Libya. He argues that a core forces should have been trained abroad and then distributed across the country to create a professional armed force.
But Wardougou does not only represent Libya; he also represents the interests of his tribe, the Tubu. Because of their cross-border family connections – most of them live in Chad – the Tubu are viewed by most Libyans as dangerous interlopers and often face harsh discrimination.
Colonel Wardougou spent decades fighting a rebellion in the Sahel region and was even the commander of the so-called Sahel Liberation Army in Niger. In his view, the government in Tripoli is a farce because radical forces from Benghazi, the second largest city, are pulling all the strings.
“They have sent us more Islamists [as reinforcements],” says Wardougou. “They want us to believe that they have the border region to Chad and Niger under control. But actually we are the only ones who provide a degree of order and root out the drug smugglers.” They never stay long anyway, he adds, because of the harsh conditions in the desert.
The frustration of the local government is palpable and, in Wardougou’s view, the national security strategies Tripoli likes to talk about are not worth the paper they’re printed on by the time they’ve reached southern Libya.

Barack Obama Is Holding AMERICA HOSTAGE..PERIOD. By Gregory Mannarino

UK Column Live - 27th September 2013

Governments Anti-malaria drug endangers UK troops

Anti-malaria drug endangers UK troops

The British Ministry of Defence (MoD)™s refusal to ban a controversial anti-malarial drug is endangering thousands of UK troops because it has some killer side-effects such as psychosis and suicide, media reports said.
The drug, Mefloquine – better known as Lariam, has been banned by the U.S. military because of its effects on mental health and the dangers it poses to troops because of its high level of toxicity, The Independent reported.
After the drug known as a modern-day œAgent Orange” by doctors was linked to a series of suicides and murders – the most typical of which was the massacre of 16 Afghan civilians by a U.S. trooper – the U.S. military announced a total ban on its use this month.
However, Lariam is being given to British troops and repeated warnings over its dangers have fallen on deaf ears as revealed by a former senior medical officer.
œFor the past 12 years I was saying this is potentially a dangerous drug – most people can take it without problems but a few people will experience difficulties and of those a small number will become psychotic and because there are other alternatives that are safer and just as effective we should move to them but my words fell on deaf ears”, said Lt-Col Ashley Croft, who served for more than 25 years in the Royal Army Medical Corps and is an expert on malaria.

Lt Col Ashcroft, who retired in April, accused the MoD of being in œdenial mode”.
œThe problem is that it can make people have psychotic thoughts and therefore act in an irrational manner and potentially a manner that is dangerous to themselves or their colleagues, or civilians”, he added.
According to the retired officer there are other drugs such as Doxycycline and malarone, which are both safer and effective in preventing malaria.
œReally the only people that get it [Lariam] now are the poor old soldiers and they have no choice”, he noted. Lt Col Croft estimates around 2,500 soldiers a year are given the drug.
The U.S. Army produced Lariam in the 1970s, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in 1989. It was then recognized as a popular drug for preventing and treating malaria, but newer anti-malarial drugs, such as malarone have been developed in recent years with less side-effects.
MOL/HE
Copyright: Press TV