When they Wake Up : About Labour and their Treason

When they Wake Up

Written by Jack Black   first published at http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/

On 9 March 2009, Sir Andrew Green, the Chairman of MigrationWatch, was quoted thus by The Daily Star: "THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION... THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR… The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN’." The Star added: "BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION CHAOS IS DOWN TO DISASTROUS LABOUR POLICIES AND NOT GLOBAL POPULATION MOVEMENT. A DAMNING NEW REPORT ACCUSES THE GOVERNMENT OF A ‘SMOKESCREEN’ TO COVER UP ITS OWN FAILURES. LABOUR’S DISMANTLING OF BORDER CONTROLS AND ENCOURAGING FOREIGNERS TO ARRIVE EN MASSE HAS SEEN IMMIGRATION TREBLE... UP TO 947,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULD BE IN THE UK – TWO-THIRDS MORE THAN A HOME OFFICE ESTIMATE IN 2001… EMBARKATION CONTROLS WERE SCRAPPED IN 1998, SO FOREIGNERS ON TIME-LIMITED VISAS REALISED THAT THERE WERE NO CHECKS TO SEE THAT THEY EVER LEFT. IN 1997 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE – WHERE APPLICANTS HAD TO SHOW THEIR MARRIAGE WAS NOT ‘PRIMARILY TO OBTAIN ADMISSION TO THE UK’ – WAS SCRAPPED, LEADING TO A 50% INCREASE IN SPOUSES ARRIVING. The report says that since about 2000 THE GOVERNMENT HAS SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGED THE ARRIVAL OF ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. And unlike most EU partners, LABOUR FAILED TO IMPOSE CONTROLS OVER NUMBERS." New Labour was doing much more than "encourage the arrival of economic migrants". Its failure "to impose a control over numbers" was a DELIBERATE attempt to multiculturalise our world against the wishes of the vast majority of the British people. On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard: “THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION… The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA... EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL. I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date… THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS… The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”. You might think, from the astounding revelations cited above that Andrew Neather is a whistleblower. Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't listen to the whingers, London needs immigrants suggests, he is still four square behind New Labour's imposition of the Multicult upon a bewildered and disenfranchised majority. Those we vote for are at war with the British people. They have DELIBERATELY destroyed our world. Does anyone who read the articles cited above truly believe that the Labour Party, an organisation created to support and encourage the working man, has put the British worker first in this country over the last twelve years? Don’t you think that New Labour has put the rights and wants of the foreigner a thousand light years in front of ours? Don’t you think that they have spent a lot more time cuddling up to the fattest of the fat cat businessmen and the greediest of the greedy bankers than ever they have to the British people as a whole? And how about Gulf War II? How has an illegitimate war conceived by American, Israeli and British warmongers benefited us? And the obscenity that is Afghanistan? How was this unwinnable war ever going to make our lives any safer or better? These wars have ushered hundreds of our finest young men and women into an early grave and severely injured thousands more. They have also caused the Muslim world to hate us and seek to kill us in our turn, as they did successfully on 7/7/2005. They have also cost us all many billions of pounds which, I think you’ll agree, we could all do with right now. We have been betrayed, ladies and gentlemen. Those we elected to serve us have instead served themselves and the dark powers who, behind the scenes, have been pulling their strings and paying their real wages all along. Tony Blair's favourite New World Order buzz-word when he ruled over us was "interdependency". He spent the whole of his time in office making our country as dependent as he could upon others. If you are dependent upon others for food, heat, medicine and medical and technical expertise, you can never rebel. You can never thwart the will of Big Brother. It’s as simple as that. Consider the following statistics: In 1995 there were 35,000 dairy farmers in the UK. By 2006, Tony Blair's love of big business had seen this figure drop to 21,000. The supermarkets are forcing three British dairy farmers out of business every day. (New Labour's principal monetary sponsor, Lord Sainsbury, owns the Sainsbury supermarket chain and Margaret Thatcher's Westminster Council pin-up girl, Dame Shirley Porter, owns Tesco) Between 1997 and 2002, the number of UK farm workers fell by 100,000. Between 1997 and 2002, butchers, bakers, newsagents, fishmongers and the like were closing at the rate of fifty a week in Tony Blair's Cool Brittania. In 1995, the UK fishing industry comprised 9,750 vessels. In 2005 there were just 6,722 of these left with a good few of these owned and crewed by non-indigenous fishermen. Here's a little EU insanity: In 2004, the UK exported 1,500 tonnes of potatoes to Germany and imported 1,500 tonnes from Germany. We also exported 10,200 tonnes of milk and cream to France and imported 9,900 tonnes from that country. Since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979, hundreds of British pits have been closed and there are now just seven left. Of this national disaster, Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry at the time, (he would later be promoted to Home Secretary) commented insensitively thus: "The pace of GLOBALISATION is increasing… Britain is one of the most open, trading nations in the world… we are stronger and richer as a result and have ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF REVERSING THE PROCESS. Whatever the difficulties and challenges of GLOBALISATION the answers will not be found in the stagnant waters of protectionism… In the UK, we welcome companies who… want to operate in our competitive liberalised market… WE BELIEVE IN GLOBAL CONSUMER CHAMPIONS, NOT NATIONAL CHAMPIONS... Already, BRITAIN IMPORTS 10 MILLION TONNES OF RUSSIAN COAL EVERY YEAR, whilst the EU as a whole imports 40 million tonnes… More than a fifth of Europe’s gas comes from Russia. SHELL, BP, and smaller companies like Victoria Oil and Gas INVEST OVER $16 BILLION IN THE RUSSIAN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY BETWEEN THEM. And a Russian company recently announced investment to resurrect the Hatfield colliery here in the UK." In January 2009, the French power company, EDF, bought British Energy, the largest electricity generator and nuclear operator in Britain. Now tell me, ladies and gentlemen, is there really anyone out there who is happy to rely on Russia and France for all their energy needs? Can any of you possibly be comfortable with the fact that we are now so dependent upon those who were our sworn enemies not so long ago? If "interdependency" was Tony B Liar's favourite New World Order buzz-word, Gordon Brown’s was "globalisation". On 26 January 2009, Brown said this to the Foreign Press Association in London: "We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation… We could close our markets – for capital, financial services, trade and FOR LABOUR – and therefore REDUCE THE RISKS OF GLOBALISATION… Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as THE DIFFICULT BIRTH-PANGS OF A NEW GLOBAL ORDER - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through A NEW INTERNATIONALISM to the benefits of an expanding GLOBAL SOCIETY… SETTING THE NEW RULES FOR THIS NEW GLOBAL ORDER." On 18 April 2008, Brown gave a speech at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston, during which he used the word "global" and its derivatives 79 TIMES! The Browns and those who own them view the world as a global village. They believe that it is their absolute right to rule over this village forever. Iraqs, Afghanistans and world-wide recessions are constructed and foist upon the decent many in order that the rule of the indecent few be cemented into place. The nation state, the only obstacle in the way of this "elite" conspiracy, must be rendered obsolete for total control to be realised. Nationalism is the direct opposite of Globalism. Nationalism, the love of one’s own land, culture and kin by a nation’s people, is the one thing the Blairs, Browns and Big Brothers are afraid of. The Nationalist does not wish to rule the world, he wants only to hold sway in the land that he and his ancestors made. On 9 March 2009, Lord Peter Mandelson, the architect of New Labour, said this in the House of Commons: "The nationals coming here from the original eight new accession countries are helping to fill gaps in our labour market our British Nationals are either not available to fill OR ARE UNWILLING TO FILL." And yet, on 10 March 2009, The Daily Express was telling us this: "Earlier this month, 3,000 job-seekers arrived at a zoo in Warwickshire chasing 150 vacancies for zoo rangers, kitchen staff and cleaners. And 600 people applied for a single post as a £22,762-a-year emergency call operator in the West Midlands... At a time of high and rising unemployment, it is incredibly arrogant of Lord Mandelson to assume that British workers are not willing to do these jobs. Most of the unemployed are desperate to get back to work… The official UK unemployment rate is close to two million and is forecast to exceed three million by next year. Yet figures show 3.8 MILLION PEOPLE BORN OVERSEAS ARE NOW WORKING IN BRITAIN, more than double that of 10 years ago. And a recent study by think-tank Migrationwatch found that 1.08 million out of the 1.34 million new jobs created since 2001 have gone to non-UK citizens." On 9 March 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express: "Prime Minister Brown always tries to pin all the blame on global problems or sub-prime lending in America. But the fact is that HE IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CURRENT MESS. IT WAS HE WHO PUSHED FOR THE DISASTROUS SHOTGUN MARRIAGE BETWEEN LLOYDS TSB AND HBOS, PROMISING LLOYDS BOSS SIR VICTOR BLANK THAT HE WOULD WAIVE THE RULES ABOUT COMPETITION TO SMOOTH THE MERGER. IT WAS BROWN WHO RUINED THE PUBLIC FINANCES, PUSHED FOR MORE GLOBALISATION, PROMOTED THE CREDIT BUBBLE, WRECKED THE PRIVATE PENSIONS SYSTEM AND SOLD OFF OUR GOLD RESERVES." In a previous issue of The Express, McKinstry summed it up intelligently when he said: "IT IS NOW CLEAR THE ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE HAS BEEN BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE TWIN FORCES OF EXCESSIVE BORROWING AND UNFETTERED GLOBALISATION. THE WILFUL DISREGARD FOR EITHER FINANCIAL RESTRAINT OR THE BRITISH NATIONAL INTEREST HAS BEEN A DISASTER FOR OUR COUNTRY, DESTROYING JOBS AND STORING UP DEBTS THAT WILL BE A BURDEN FOR GENERATIONS. So what is the Government’s solution? More borrowing and MORE GLOBALISATION, of course… IN FASHIONABLE POLITICAL CIRCLES IT IS REGARDED AS OUTRAGEOUS TO ADVOCATE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT THE INTERESTS OF THE BRITISH PUBLIC FIRST by limiting the movement of labour, tightening borders, supporting domestic industries or restricting imports... THE VERY CONCEPT OF A NATIONAL INTEREST IS TREATED AS BACKWARD. THE NATURAL IMPULSE TO LOOK AFTER ONE’S OWN, WHAT USED TO BE SEEN AS NOBLE PATRIOTISM, IS NOW REGARDED AS DANGEROUSLY REACTIONARY. So we end up with the alternative created by the globalisation freaks where BRITISH WORKERS ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR JOBS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY, where the welfare state pays an Afghan single mother £170,000 a year in housing benefit to live in a large villa in west London, WHERE DOLE QUEUES LENGTHEN WHILE CALL-CENTRES ARE RELOCATED TO INDIA and where desperate migrants flood into the country to be exploited by employers paying £1 an hour… THE CREED OF GLOBALISATION HAS BROUGHT NOTHING BUT MISERY. IF WE’D HAD A BANKING SYSTEM THAT PUT THE INTERESTS OF OUR COUNTRY FIRST WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE PRESENT CHAOS, SINCE OUR BANKS WOULD NOT HAVE INDULGED IN RECKLESS LENDING TO SUB-PRIME AMERICAN HOMEBUYERS, RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS OR SPANISH PROPERTY INVESTORS... A SENSE OF NATIONAL PRIDE, THE INSTINCT THAT LIES BEHIND PROTECTIONISM, WOULD HAVE PREVENTED BRITAIN FROM ENDURING THE LUNACIES OF MULTI-CULTURALISM. WITHOUT GLOBALISATION WE WOULD STILL BE AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY RATHER THAN MERELY A REGION OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE, AN ENTITY FOR WHICH WE NEVER VOTED. WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO HAND OVER £12BILLION A YEAR TO BRUSSELS FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING GOVERNED BY EUROCRATS. In a protectionist Britain that looked after its own people we would not be squandering £8billion a year on overseas aid, most of it going to Africa where it is used to prop up tyrannical, kleptocratic regimes. It is the height of absurdity that we are forking out £40million a year in subsidies to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe." Leo McKinstry was moved to say these things, ladies and gentlemen, despite the fact that he was once a Labour Councillor and a parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the New Labour Party! In 1998, the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, oversaw the imposition of a new set of Race Laws. These laws gave the government the power to imprison us for seven long years if we committed the crime of "incitement to racial hatred". (A crime that didn't exist prior to 1965) Such law was not designed to rein in the immigrant, ladies and gentlemen. It was created to shackle us as the globalist went to war with the nation state. Our race laws were constructed to encourage and promote the outsider at the expense of the native Briton. And they have, haven't they? Have our politicians flooded our country with unwanted foreigners against our will over the last few decades? Have they spent the last 40-odd years giving our council housing stock to the same foreigners? Are they giving our jobs to them as we speak? Are our formerly nationalised industries, which once belonged to all the British people, now owned, not just by foreign countries like France, but by a few mega-rich "new global order" aliens as well? Are you not aware that our politicians have, wherever they could, covered up non-native criminality and trumpeted the reverse? Did it never occur to you, ladies and gentlemen, that the "New Global Order" would be that much easier to achieve if THEY could convince the most gullible and trusting Britons (the young) to believe that the immigrant hordes were, somehow, better than us? Ever since the first race law was introduced in 1965 by the Labour Home Secretary of the time, Frank Soskice, (himself a Russian immigrant) our own politicians have put the foreigner first in our country. The same politicians put the British working-classes, who had worked so hard, sacrificed so much and died the deaths in all their wars, a very long way last. According to information supplied by the 5 April 2011 edition of The Daily Mail, in just 19 of the UK's 52 police districts, 91,234 foreigners were arrested in 2010! If we extrapolate the 91,234 figure across the whole of the UK, we arrive at a grand total of 249,593 immigrants arrested in the UK last year! Which is so “enriching”, don’t you think? So liable to make us wish to “cohere” with Johnny Foreigner. So wonderfully “diverse” and “multicultural”! At least, that’s what it is if you’re an active member of the Labour Party, the Lib Dems or the Greens. Or you are happy to belong to the hug-a-hoodie wing of the David Cameron’s lot. Or you are a PC activist, a bought and paid for government jobsworth or an immigrant yourself. If you dare to speak out about the damage the 249,593 are doing, all of the above will label you a "racist", a "Fascist", a "bigot", a "Nazi", a "dinosaur" and/or a "little Englander". And if you dare to speak out about the hidden statistics, those that include the second and third-generation immigrant criminals, you are an even bigger "racist", "Fascist", "bigot", "Nazi", "dinosaur", "little Englander". Speak out anyway and hit back with the word "traitor". Your one insult will be a thousand light years more truthful than any number of theirs. In a 1944 essay titled 'The English People', George Orwell wrote with affection of the ‘gentle-mannered, undemonstrative, law-abiding English’. He said that foreigners were amazed by our ‘gentleness… by the orderly behaviour of English crowds, the lack of pushing and quarrelling’. He also said that there was ‘very little crime or violence.’ Despite the war, that’s how our world was in 1944. In 1955, the anthropologist, Geoffrey Gorer, was moved to say this: “The English are certainly among the most peaceful, gentle, courteous and orderly populations that the civilised world has ever seen.” That’s how our world was in 1955. That, ladies and gentlemen, is what we had before the social engineers, those who know so much better and see so much further than the rest of us, decided to change it all. By 2009, one uniquely honest Labour politician was admitting to this: “In my constituency… there are now more violent crimes against the person than there were in the whole country 50 years ago.” And now we have the figures. In just one year, around 250,000 foreigners were arrested in this country. You know, they could put me in jail for seven years for telling the unfashionable truths that I tell. And yet, unlike the politicians who created the Brit-bashing seven-year law, I don’t spin, I don’t lie, I don’t exaggerate and I don’t cover up. I just dare to say the things that the richest and most powerful of the globalist gangsters do not want you to know. I dared to say some of these things in the 2010 General Election where I stood as an Independent candidiate. I leafleted extensively and was able to put my views pretty candidly in the local newspapers. As a result, a huge number of people were able to access a deal of damning information that they would otherwise not have come across. Nevertheless, their verdict was categoric. I polled just over 400 votes, 0.8% of the total. Despite the observably terrible behaviours of those who had brought about a state affairs where, in just one British constituency, "there are now more violent crimes against the person than there were in the whole country 50 years ago", the British people were not prepared to contemplate voting those who had created such a dreadful statistic out of office. At the 2010 General Election, yet again, the British people chose not to heed the warnings. I hope I’m still here when they wake up to what the politcians have done. I hope I'm still here when political correctness is made a capital crime. I hope I'm still here when the “social engineers" are charged with treason, found guilty and strung up. I hope the good guys who do the stringing let the rest of us watch. I'd pay good money for a front row seat. Any seat at all in fact. If you are intested in viewing the information contained in the leaflets I delivered in May 2010, these may accessed here

Labour Mass Immigration Policy Why Is This Not Treason ?

Gates of Vienna: Why Is This Not Treason?: "English correspondent Paul Weston returns with a spirited broadside against the treacherous Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero

• 
  

On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.

That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our children’s future.

Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.

Consider some of the following statistics:

• Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
  
• Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
  
• MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
  
• Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”

All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.

The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.

And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial redemption from those they once oppressed.

So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass Muslim immigration.

A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.

And once the floodgates were opened, it became supremely important not to turn anybody away. Of the 2 million visas issued every year, fifteen percent of them were “processed” when they should not have been in order to hit “productivity targets,” with immigration officials placed under intense political pressure to issue visas rather than reject them.

One man who took advantage of Blair’s treachery was Abu Baseer, the spiritual advisor to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation linked to Al Qaeda. Baseer was originally based in Iraq prior to settling in West London, from where he issues various fatwas calling for death to British soldiers and the overthrow of the West. He had this to say on the subject of immigration:

“One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.”

The next stage in Labour’s war against Britain and its indigenous people was to make sure the foreign colonisers maintained their 7th century ideology and customs through a curious yet highly effective liberal process called “multiculturalism.” This guaranteed their non-assimilation and thus provided Tony Blair and his friends with a hostile and ever-growing tool with which to incrementally erode traditional Britain.

Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis.

Not even our children were safe from Tony Blair’s thought police. The propaganda arms of the BBC and the state educational service tried to convince our children that their race, culture, religion and history consisted only of genocide, racism and evil. The spectre of Adolf Hitler was also constantly invoked with the quite deliberate intention of linking any resistance to the religious and ethnic colonisation of Britain with the actions and ideology of the Nazis.

And while third-world immigration continued apace, the Labour Party lied to cover up the attendant serial catastrophes. We were told that they were peaceful, that they committed little crime and that they were a benefit to the economy. None of this was true, as detailed by the exposure of Labours’ various lies and distortions, which showed a negative cost to the economy and a disproportionate level of crime including rape and murder — and of course, terrorism.

Nine out of ten new jobs were taken by immigrants, along with eighty-five percent of new housing. Muslims are grossly over-represented within Britain’s jails and within Britain’s welfare state, which supports fifty percent of Muslim males and seventy-five percent of females who reproduce like belt-fed mortars rather than going out to work.

To further bolster the Muslim demographics, Britain’s laws against polygamy were overlooked in the case of Islam. Muslim males could thus legally amass four imported wives, twenty to thirty children and a large house (or houses) in which to raise them, all paid for by the Labour state — right down to the satellite dish tuned into the various sources of jihad beamed direct from the East.

Only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as white British. Twenty percent of mothers are first generation immigrants, and a further twenty-five percent second or third generation immigrants. The idea that there are only 2.4 million Muslims in Britain is therefore ridiculous. There is strong evidence to suggest the numbers could be somewhere between 5-10 million.

The welfare-funded Muslim birth-rate has already rendered English children a minority in many city schools. In London, white school children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority. Figures from the Office of National Statistics suggest that British people of all ages will become a minority by 2066 with the young becoming a minority far earlier, and the young English earlier still.

These apocalyptic figures led Professor David Coleman of Oxford University to state that the transition of white Britons to a minority was likely to be: “unwelcome… and would represent an enormous change to national identity — cultural, political, economic and religious”.

Professor Coleman is quite right, but what is scarcely believable is that these enormous changes were precisely what the Labour Party had in mind in 1997. This was made apparent when Peter Hitchens recounted his dismay regarding a fellow hack who jumped ship in order to work for the Labour Party:

“I asked him why he had done this awful thing. He replied: you have no idea at all just how enormous the New Labour Project really is.”

Other people were all too aware of the size and direction of the Labour Party juggernaut, but still managed to hold onto their naiveté as to its ultimate destination, which appears to be the cultural and racial eradication of the English people. This genocidal policy was explained by Tony Blair’s speech-writer Andrew Neather in 2010, when he rather foolishly came out with the following treasonous nuggets:

‘It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year was to open up the UK to mass migration… to make the UK truly multicultural…the policy was intended to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date… this shone through even in the published report: the “social outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants’

There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.

The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks, was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%

The Labour Party has form with this kind of gerrymandering. Ex-Communist Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, Herbert Morrison, who was Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister between 1945-1951, came up with the novel idea of constructing soviet-style concrete tower-blocks for the working-class to live in who would subsequently vote Labour and thus “build the f*****g Tories (Conservatives) out of London.”

Tony Blair simply took it a stage further, and imported a “vigorously encouraged to feel oppressed class” from foreign climes to serve as cultural destroyers / Labour bloc-voters. This is a subtle re-working of Bertolt Brecht’s comment in the wake of East Berlin’s 1953 bread riots, when he suggested: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?”

Who would have thought this would one day apply to “democratic” Britain where the indigenous people are not so much being dissolved as replaced, and where “population replacement” is simply a more refined way of saying ethnic cleansing?

It was James Burnham who first coined the phrase “Suicide of the West”, but this is not a majority-ordained suicide. It is a minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.

The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what is slowly but surely happening to the English.

And because it is happening so slowly, many people are unaware of the situation. If a man is injected with a fast acting poison and dies minutes later, he has clearly been murdered. But is it not still murder if the poison were slow acting and allowed the man to live another twenty years?

It is the act of injection, knowing the consequences, which makes it murder, and Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally destroyed as a result.

We can see this destruction today. Vulnerable girls in Northern towns were groomed and raped by Pakistanis for over eight years without any recrimination. The police simply pretended nothing untoward was happening. Much the same happened in Berlin in the mid 1930s to the Jews, who suffered tremendous persecution that was subsequently ignored by the authorities.

In London, entire areas are slowly coming under Islamic control. Tower Hamlets is now lost to the West as Jews, women and homosexuals are persecuted whilst English street names and the few remaining whites are systematically replaced. Soon to be lost, if indeed they are not already lost are Luton, Bradford, Oldham, Birmingham, Leicester, etc. Fjordman calls this Beheading Nations and asks the following question:

“Less attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading entire nation states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is no less dramatic. Historically, the major cities have constituted a country’s ‘head’ the seat of most of its political institutions and the largest concentration of its cultural brainpower. What happens when this “head” is cut off from the rest of the body?”

When our racial / religious society cedes territory to a rival society, then we are losing a battle. When the state enacts laws to reward the aggressive incomer and to penalise the passive native, then we are losing a battle. When our children are brainwashed into the belief that they are evil and worthy only of displacement, then we are losing a battle. When our women and children are raped and abused whilst the state remains silent, then we are losing a battle.

And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the aggressor to demographically swamp us, then we have not just lost a battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.

We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with a resounding No!

Although lawyers may argue over the precise meaning of the word “treason”, everyone else understands it only too well, including Tony Blair, which (along with the EU sell-out) is presumably why he repealed the treason laws. The Labour government was elected to represent the best interests of the British people, not those of Mirpur.

It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor, and actively sided against Britain and the British people.

Rather than sign off with a furious tirade about the severe recrimination traitors should endure, I will leave you instead with a calm yet deeply poignant quote from Alex Henshaw, chief test-pilot for Vickers Armstrong during the Second World War. Despite test-flying ten percent of all Spitfires during their development stage, Mr Henshaw survived the war and lived a long life before dying in 2007:

“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.”

Yes, Mr Henshaw. I am afraid you have.




Previous posts by Paul Weston:

2007		Jan		22		The Week Britain Died
				26		Britain’s Dystopian School Children
		Feb		2		Questioning the Sanity of Liberals
		Mar		1		Multiculturalism — Merits and Debits
				31		Is European Civil War Inevitable by 2025?
		Jun		26		The Big Story That Isn’t
		Aug		10		An Open Letter to Fellow Europeans
				24		A Brussels Perspective
		Sep		12		Democratic Europe R.I.P.
		Nov		2		The Coming Third World War
				21		Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 1
				29		Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 2
2008		Mar		27		The Face of Moderate Islam in Britain
2009		Feb		9		Wilders in Wonderland
				13		Who is Lord Ahmed?
				25		Temporary Peace Trumps Freedom of Speech
		Jul		1		Muslims, Mosques and Mosquitoes
				2		Islam, the BBC, and Young Children
				8		Review of “A Bridge Too Far”
				17		Socialist Propaganda in British Education
		Oct		15		Multiculturalism Has Destroyed the British Police
2010		Mar		16		Ethnically Cleansing the English
		Oct		7		Banana Republic Britain
				30		“We Will Hold You to Account”
		Dec		5		The Metaphorical Front Line of Islam
				5		The West Needs to Wake Up
				7		Land for Peace — Or Land for a Terror State?

behavior of the Labour government and their ..."

Horwich and Bolton! The Real Labour Party 25 ,Would You trust Them with Children,

LABOUR PARTY = EVIL ?

Ladies and Gentleman of Horwich Bolton presenting you the true Face of the Labour 25, from a party that wants to lower the age of consent and promote sexual perversion in our children's classrooms, you will be shocked! at what this traitorous and sickening excuse for a political party this IS!

Also there were documents showing that leading light and prominent figure in the Labour Party Harriet Harman MP called on ministers to make sexually explicit photographs or films of children legal unless there was evidence that the subject had been harmed. At the time she made the official submission, she was a senior figure in a civil liberties organisation that wanted the age of consent to be lowered to 14 and incest decriminalised. It also defended self-confessed paedophiles in the press and allowed them to attend its meetings.
Also many more cases of corruption and theft from councillors and with MP's jailed for theft and fraud  as well !

LABOUR PARTY = EVIL ?

The International Community , The Truth !

The International Community

News Team at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

By John Salvage –
Is there really such a thing as the “International Community”, or is it a collection of nation-hating, treacherous and greedy elites? Does it actually exist, or is it all a work in progress for a bigger, more threatening evil to be imposed upon the once-free peoples of earth?
Two questions that many ordinary people are now asking, and two questions most Nationalists already know the answers to. All the facts seem to point towards some form of global government, whereby countries not “conforming” to the aforementioned elites’ agenda, such as Libya, for example, seem to be targeted for enforcement of “democracy”.
Now there's an odd word, because the origins of democracy are not linked to anything recognisable today. The revolutionary principles of most leaders today are nothing like democratic. They steal wealth, change attitudes and completely rubbish the word by their actions.
If democracy were truly a political reality, then we would in this country have had Proportional Representation (PR). Now we have a toothless halfway house, whereby people are so confused we'll actually end up with the same crooks and greedy elites as we've had since the end of the Second World War.
Some people even think that a form of street action here, or outright revolution, would get us to where we need to be. This won't happen, and we'd soon see the “International Community”, led by the hidden hand of New York and London financiers, shredding human bodies under a barrage of modern weaponry.
Too much damage has already been done to our people’s minds. The mind benders have been hard at work, through TV, media, news and film production, and we now have no real arguments left that resemble “old school” political thought or division of political manifestos. The agenda is the same, but people are seemingly unable to view things as they are. Most people will see Cameron, Obama, Clegg or Sarkozy as different to their supposed opposition on the other side. That is simply wrong, but a sad fact of life today.
If there were such a thing as a truly democratic International Community, we would see leaders proposing an end to outrageous warmongering. We would see a referendum-based option, rather than the current system. Using referendums, people would then be able to vote en-masse on the things that really make them angry and actually change things each year. As it stands, whether it's Cameron, Clegg, Sarkozy or Obama, the time they have in power is used to solidify a form of world governmental preference and not any preference based upon the wishes of each leader's nation.
The Nationalist community can use all its relatively newfound power, especially in France and the Nordic countries, to house hopes for a similar shift in thought here. The British National Party will soon find out if the people are yet ready to show their ancient strength and innate Anglo-Celtic will to take back what is rightfully theirs.
No amount of rhetoric, dogma, or pleading will persuade the “International Community” to shed its cloak and come out in favour of a Nationalist agenda. No, it will, though, show its unity if ever, such as Austria did once, the governments of the western hemisphere turn to its people, rather than shadowy elites. Austria took a beating when Jörg Haider managed to secure enough power to change things. That is a lesson all Nationalist thinkers, voters, and long-time activists need to be aware of. No matter what political party starts to take a lead first, here or abroad, the financial robber barons, and their Genetically Modified political frontliners, will start the old favourite: sanctions. These are the favoured first line of defence for the globalist elite and the “International Community”. First they come for the government, then the people, then the whole country, and ultimately, the world.
Hopefully, the British National Party can, under its present leadership, stave off the many detractors inside and out and begin the climb back to where it was until fairly recently. However, without solidarity of spirit, and without activists, the Nationalist cause in the UK will splinter, and as Mr Le Pen once put it, whilst I was actually proudly in his company a few years ago at a function, “The British were the ones whom we copied, and we took our lead from you.”
Forget petty arguments, as many of us in the British National Party know for certain that, without Mr Griffin, we would not have been so fortunate as to put Nationhood at the forefront of the general public's eyes. Now they know of us, our policies, and what we have all said and predicted has come true. It’s not that long ago, don't forget, whereby the Front National was split, and various movements in France were shattered by such pettiness.
Also, anyone who studied the Nordic nations will remember a time when the Finns were not even on the map in political terms. Now, millions are aware of their True Finns political party and the power they could bring to their people. The International Community will have won if we in Britain are unable to stave off any attacks on us and the foremost political party, the only Nationalist party with any hope of smashing a hole in the dam.
Openly damaging arguments can be kept to a minimum, as the internet, as popular as it can be, is also mostly passed by, because many are simply uninterested in aspects of it. All political groups and parties were happy to see victories here in the UK for the British National Party, so in reality, nothing needs to damage any further gains or momentum. All that matters is that the essentials are kept intact and that sometime, somehow, this nation becomes independent once again, with or without sanctions or threats of military action by the “International Community”. One only needs to take even a passing glance at the main British National Party website to see that the stories are hard hitting, especially about immigration, the EU, and immigrant politicians, all making hay whilst the sun shines.
If there were any chance of any other political party from the nationalist cause making gains, that party would also have the same battles to fight, and the leader of such a party would have to be the equal of Mr Griffin in terms of hard-headed determination under extreme pressure.
I doubt we have such leaders elsewhere, and it is doubtful whether opposing Nationalist political parties can ever be free from already entrenched “sleepers”, malcontents and people free from supposed “baggage” etc. Let us take what we have, love it, live it and be prepared for whatever challenges we face. We have nowhere else to go, either politically, or worldly.
Too long a wait to rebuild from scratch is not an option. Politically, we already have the vehicle to damage our opponents, and the proof is all around. Stories galore of British National Party racism, thuggery, sex, money, and all other topics of the chattering classes, are simply that... stories. The International Community can go to hell. We are the BRITISH, and we are NATIONALISTS. Millions now want change in Britain, so let's give it to them, and let's make our brothers and sisters in Finland, Sweden, the US, France, Germany and around the western world proud to know us and call us equals in the battle for Britain and the western world's renaissance.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again. 
  The Greening the Environmentalists Drive for Global Power,

The “Minorities” Becoming the Majority in The UK

The “Minorities” Becoming the Majority

   News Team

By Stephen Palmer – The amount of “minorities” in Britain has skyrocketed by nearly 40 per cent in the last eight years, as the number of immigrants here increased by 2.5 million, according to official statistics.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures show that the immigrant population rose from 6.6 million in 2001 to 9.1 million in 2009, meaning one in six of the people in England and Wales is now from an ethnic minority or non-British background.
Estimates stated that 1.75 million of the rise was due to immigration, while 734,000 was the result of rising birth rates amongst certain immigrant groups. The increases mean the minority population increased by 37 per cent between 2001 and 2009.
The largest ethnic group in the country is Indians, who account for more than 1.4 million people living here, and Pakistanis, who represent a further one million residents.
The ONS said the rise in the UK’s Indian population, which is 380,000 up on 2001, is “primarily due” to international migration, while high birth rates are a key factor behind the combined 390,000 growth in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations, who are of a younger average age than indigenous Britons.
Among the sharpest increases was the Chinese ethnic group, whose population nearly doubled to reach 452,000 in 2009.
The total of black Africans has also soared since 2001, up by 300,000, or 6.2 per cent a year. The rise is largely attributed to bogus asylum seekers from Zimbabwe, Somalia, Eritrea and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
By contrast, the number of white Britons has remained static over the eight-year period.
Across England, Leicester has the highest proportion of Asian Indians, at 19 per cent. Bradford is next with 13 per cent of Asian Pakistanis, and 21 per cent of the residents of Tower Hamlets in London are Asian Bangladeshi.
The highest proportion of black Caribbean people live in Lewisham, southeast London, followed by Birmingham. It is estimated that British whites will become a minority in Leicester, Birmingham, Bradford and Oldham by 2016, if they are not so already.
Brent, in north London, is the country’s most colonized borough. Just over a third of its population counts as white British, with large mixed-race, Asian and black communities making up the rest.
Tory MPs and the Tory-supporting Migration Watch organization have cheaply tried to blame the sweeping demographic changes on Labour, despite their own party’s operating identical open-doors immigration policies that have seen immigrants pour into the country by the hundreds of thousands during the ConDem’s first year in office.
The only party that will stop the colonization, foreignization, Islamification, and ethnic cleansing of the English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish is the British National Party.
As previously reported on this website, the majority (73 per cent) of British citizens said they would be “unhappy” if whites were to become a minority in Britain. They have one way to avoid that fate – by joining the British National Party – otherwise they have no one to blame but themselves for their inevitable misery.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

A warning to America - Speech Geert Wilders, Cornerstone Church, Nashville,USA May 2011

	A warning to America - Speech Geert Wilders, Cornerstone Church, Nashville,  Dear friends from Tennessee. I am very happy to be in your midst today. I am happy and proud to be in this impressive church. My friends, I am here to speak words of truth and freedom. Do you know why America is in a better state than Europe? Because you enjoy more freedom than Europeans. And do you know why Americans enjoy more freedom than Europeans? Because you are still allowed to tell the truth. In Europe and Canada people are dragged to court for telling the truth about islam. I, too, have been dragged to court. I am an elected member of the house of representatives in the Netherlands. I am currently standing in court like a common criminal for saying that islam is a dangerous totalitarian ideology rather than a religion. The court case is still pending, but I risk a jail sentence of 16 months. Last week, my friend Lars Hedegaard, a journalist from Denmark, was fined because in a private conversation, which was recorded without his knowing, he had criticised the way women are treated in islamic societies. Recently, another friend, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a human rights activist from Austria, was fined because she had criticised islam's founder Muhammad. She had said that Muhammad was a pedophile because he had married a 6-year old girl and raped her when she was 9. Unfortunately, there are many similar cases. I am especially happy to be in your midst because here I can say what I want to say without having to fear that I will be dragged to court upon leaving this church. My dear American friends, you cannot imagine how we envy your First Amendment. The day when America follows the example of Europe and Canada and introduces so-called "hate speech crimes" which is only used to punish people who are critical of islam, that day America will have lost its freedom. My friends, let us hope that this never happens. Last week, we celebrated Liberation Day in the Netherlands. We celebrated the liberation from the Nazi occupation in 1945. Many American soldiers, including many young Tennesseans, played a decisive role in the liberation of the Netherlands from nazi tyranny. We are immensely grateful for that. Young Americans gave their lives so that the Dutch might be free. I assure you: The Dutch people will never forget this. Unfortunately, however, the Europe which your fathers and grandfathers fought and died for is not the Europe we are living in today. I travel the world to tell people what Europe has become. I wish I could take you all on a visit to my country and show you what Europe has become. It has changed beyond recognition as a result of mass immigration. And not just any mass immigration, but mass immigration driven by the dangerous force of islam. My friends, I am sorry. I am here today with an unpleasant message. I am here with a warning. I am here with a battle cry: "Wake up, Christians of Tennessee. Islam is at your gate." Do not make the mistake which Europe made. Do not allow islam to gain a foothold here. Islam is dangerous. Islam wants to establish a state on earth, ruled by islamic sharia law. Islam aims for the submission, whether by persuasion, intimidation or violence, of all non-Muslims, including Christians. The results can be seen in Europe. Islam is an ideology of conquest. It uses two methods to achieve this goal: the first method is the sword. Do you know what figures on the flag of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a country where Christian churches are banned and Christians are not even allowed to wear a tiny crucifix? There is a huge sword on that flag, just below the Islamic creed. The message is clear. Without the sword islam would not have been able to spread its creed. The second method is immigration. Islam's founder Muhammad himself taught his followers how to conquer through immigration when they moved from Mecca to Medina. This phenomenon of conquest through immigration is called al-Hijra. My learned friend Sam Solomon has written a perfect book about it. I had a copy of Sam's book sent to all the members of the Dutch Parliament. But most of them are worse than Saint-Thomas in the Bible. Thomas did not believe what he had not seen. Most politicians refuse to believe the things they see before their very eyes. In Europe we have been experiencing al-Hijra for over 30 years now. Many of our cities have changed beyond recognition. "In each one of our cities" wrote the well-known Italian author Oriana Fallaci shortly before her death in 2006, "there is a second city, a state within the state, a government within the government. A Muslim city, a city ruled by the Koran." - end of quote. How did the Europeans get into this situation? It is partly our own fault because we have foolishly adopted the concept of cultural relativism, which manifests itself in the ideology of multiculturalism. Cultural relativism advocates that all cultures are equal. However, cultures wither away and die if people no longer believe that its values are better than those of another culture. Islam is spreading like wildfire wherever people lack the guts to say that their values are better than the Islamic values. Islam is spreading like wildfire because the Koran explicitly tells Muslims that they are "the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind" and that non-Muslims are "the worst of creatures." Islam is spreading like wildfire everywhere in the West where political, academic, cultural and media elites lack the guts to proudly proclaim, as I believe we all should proclaim: Our Judeo-Christian Western culture is far better and far superior to the islamic culture. We must be proud to say so! Multiculturalism is a disaster. Almost everyone acknowledges this today, but few dare say why. Let me tell you why: Multiculturalism made us tolerate the intolerant, and now intolerance is annihilating tolerance. We should, in the name of tolerance, claim the right not to tolerate the intolerant. Let us no longer be afraid and politically correct, let us be brave and bold. Let us tell the truth about islam. Before I continue I want to make clear that I do not have a problem with people. I always make a distinction between the people and the ideology, between Muslims and islam. Indeed, I have no problems with Muslims, but I do have a problem with the totalitarian Islamic ideology of hate and violence. The fact that there are many so-called moderate Muslims, does not imply that there exists a moderate islam. A moderate islam doen not exist and will never exist. And because there is no such thing as a moderate islam, the islamization of our free Western societies is an enormous danger. Only two weeks ago, the British press revealed how the so-called "London Taliban" is threatening to kill women who do not wear veils in the London borough of Tower Hamlets. In some neighbourhoods Islamic regulations are already being enforced, also on non-Muslims. Women's rights are being trampled. We are confronted with headscarves and burqa's, polygamy, female genital mutilation, honor-killings where men murder their wives, daughters or sisters because they do not behave in accordance with Islamic rules. Polls show that the influence of those Muslims who live according to islam's aggressive requirements is growing, especially among young people. Among 15-year-old German Muslims, 40 percent consider islam more important than democracy. Among Muslim university students in Britain, 40 percent support sharia. One in three of those students considers it legitimate to kill in the name of islam. Christians are asked to follow the example of Jesus. Muslims are ordered to follow the example of Muhammad. That is why islam is dangerous. While Christianity preaches love, islam preached hatred and practizes violence. Hatred and violence for everyone who is not a Muslim. Muhammad personally participated in the ethnic cleansing of Medina, where half the population once was Jewish. Muhammad helped to chop off their heads. On his deathbed, he ordered his followers to cleanse Arabia of all Jews and Christians. To this very day, Christian symbols are prohibited in Saudi-Arabia. If you wear a cross in Saudi Arabia, they sent you to jail. And now, Europe is beginning to look like Arabia. Just today, a poll revealed that in Brussels, the capital of the European Union, half the islamic youths are anti-semitic. It is dangerous for Jews to walk the streets in Brussels. If you wear a cross or a kippah in certain urban areas in Europe today, you risk being beaten up. In the capital of my own country, Amsterdam, a tram driver was forced to remove his crucifix from sight, while his Muslim colleagues are allowed to wear the veil. In June 2008, the Christian church authorities in the Danish town of Arhus decided to pay so-called "protection money" to islamic so-called "security guards" who assure that church goers are not harassed by islamic youths. On March 31st, 2010, Muslims entered the Roman Catholic cathedral of Cordoba, Spain, and attacked the guards with knives. They claimed the cathedral was theirs. Last month, the bishops of Sweden sent out a letter to priests advising them to avoid converting asylum seekers from islamic countries to Christianity, because the converts would risk losing their lives. In the Netherlands, the city authorities in Amsterdam register polygamous marriages. The authorities in Rotterdam serve only halal meals in municipal cafeterias. Theaters provide separate seats for women who are not allowed to sit next to men. Municipal swimming pools have separate swimming hours for men and women, Muslim lawyers do not have to stand when the judges enter court rooms. Meanwhile Jews are no longer safe on our streets. In Amsterdam, the city of Anne Frank, Jews are again being harassed in the streets. Even political leaders acknowledged that life has become unsafe for Jews in Holland. Do you know what they said? They advised Jews to emigrate. Jews are already running for Israel. But I say: Jews must not leave, violent Muslims must leave! What is needed, my friends, is a spirit of resistance. I repeat: What we need is a spirit of resistance. Why? Because resistance to evil is our moral duty. This resistance begins with expressing our solidarity to Christians, Jews, indeed, to all people worldwide, who are the victims of islam. There are millions of them. We can see what islam has in store for us if we watch the fate of the Christians in the islamic world, such as the Copts in Egypt, the Maronites in Lebanon, the Assyrians in Iraq, and Christians elsewhere. Almost every day, churches are arsoned and Christians are assassinated in islamic countries. In a report on the persecution of Christians in the world, Archbishop Twal of Jerusalem, wrote recently- I quote: "In the Middle East to be Christian means accepting that you must make a great sacrifice. All too often and in many places, Christians suffer various threats. On some occasions, their homes and churches are burnt, and people are killed. How many atrocities must we endure before somebody somewhere comes to our aid?" - end of quote. Indeed, how many atrocities before we come to their aid? Rivers of tears are flowing from the Middle East, where there is only one safe haven for Christians. You know where that is. The only place in the Middle East where Christians are safe is Israel. That is why Israel deserves our support. Israel is a safe haven for everyone, whatever their belief and opinions. Israel is a beacon of light in a region of total darkness. Israel is fighting our fight. The jihad against Israel is a jihad against all of us. If Israel falls, we, too, will feel the consequences. If Jerusalem falls, Athens, Rome, Amsterdam and Nashville will fall. Therefore, we all are Israel. We should always support Israel! Today, we are confronted with political unrest in the Arab countries. The Arab peoples long for freedom. However, the ideology and culture of islam is so deeply entrenched in these countries that real freedom is simply impossible as long as islam remains dominant. A recent poll in post-revolution Egypt found that 85 percent of Egyptians are convinced that islam's influence on politics is good, 82 percent believe that adulterers should be stoned, 84 percent want the death penalty for apostates. The press refers to the events in the Arab world today as the Arab spring. I call it the Arab winter. Islam and freedom, islam and democracy are not compatible. The death of Osama bin Laden last week was a victory for the free world, but we will be confronted with Islamic terrorism as long as islam exists, because islam's founder Muhammad himself was a terrorist, worse than Bin Laden. And here is another truth: The rise of islam means the rise of sharia law in our judicial systems. In Europe we already have sharia wills, sharia schools, sharia banks. Britain even has sharia courts. In my own country, the Netherlands, sharia is being applied by the courts in cases relating to divorce, child custody, inheritance, and property ownership. Women are always the victims of this because sharia discriminates women. This is a disgrace. This is not the way we should treat women. My friends, I told you that we have just remembered Liberation Day to commemorate the young Americans and all the heroes who offered their lives to free the Netherlands from nazi tyranny. It would be an insult to them if we Europeans would give up that precious freedom for another totalitarian ideology called Islam. That is the goal for which my party and I work day after day. And we are having success. In the Netherlands, we are successfully starting to roll back islam. The current Dutch government is a minority government which can only survive with the backing of my party, the Party for Freedom. We have 24 seats of the 150 seats in parliament and we support the government, in return for measures to prohibit certain aspects of sharia law. We have achieved that the Netherlands will soon ban the burka and the niqaab. We will also restrict immigration from non-Western countries by up to 50% in the next four years. We are not going to allow islam to steal our country from us. It was the land of our fathers, it is our land now, our values are based on Christianity, Judaism and Humanism and we will pass this on to our children with all the freedoms that the previous generations have fought for. Let those who want to rob us from our freedoms, stay in their own countries. We do not need them. If you want to wear a burqa, stay in Saudi-Arabia. If you want four wives, stay in Iran. If you want to live in a country where the islamic ideology is dominant, stay in Pakistan, if you don't want to assimilate in our society, stay in Somalia. But don't come over here. We are also going to strip criminals who have a double nationality - for instance Dutch and Moroccan, and who repeatedly commit serious crimes, of their Dutch nationality. We will send them packing, back to their homeland. My friends, what the Party for Freedom has achieved, shows that it can be done. We can fight the islamization of our societies. Dear friends, here is my warning. Make no mistake: Islam is also coming for America. In fact, it is already here. America is facing a stealth jihad, the islamic attempt to introduce sharia law bit by bit. Last March, a judge in Tampa, Florida, ruled that a lawsuit against a mosque and involving the control of 2.4 million dollars, should proceed under Islamic law. My friends, be aware that this is only the beginning. This is also how it started in Europe. If things continue like this, you will soon have the same problems as we are currently facing. Leaders who talk about immigration without mentioning islam are blind. They ignore the most important problem Europe and America are facing. I have a message for them: it's islam stupid! My friends, fortunately, not all politicians are irresponsible. Here, in Tennessee, brave politicians want to pass legislation which gives the state the power to declare organisations as terrorist groups and allowing material supporters of terrorism to be prosecuted. I applaud them for that. They are true heroes. Yesterday and today, I met some of those brave legislators. They told me that Tennessee in particular is a target of islam. Help them win their battle. They need your support. While Tennessee is in the frontline, similar legislative initiatives are also being taken in the states of Oklahoma, Wyoming, South Carolina, Texas, Florida, Missouri, Arizona, Indiana. It is encouraging to see that so many politicians are willing to resist islam. This gives us hope and courage. I am not a pessimist. We can still turn the tide - even in Europe - if we act today. There are five things which we must do. First, we must defend freedom of speech. Freedom is the source of human creativity and development. People and nations wither away without the freedom to question what is presented to them as the truth. Without freedom of speech we risk becoming slaves. Frederick Douglass, the 19th century black American politician, the son of a slave, said - I quote - "To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker." I have already told you about my court case. This legal charade will not, however, prevent me from saying the truth. Never. I will speak out, even if they drag me before 500 courts and threaten to jail me for a thousand years. The fact that we are being treated as criminals for telling the truth must not deter us. We are doomed if we remain silent or let ourselves be silenced. Let us not forget, this is our first and most important obligation: defend the right to speak the truth. Second, we must end cultural relativism and political correctness. We must repeat it over and over again, especially to our children: Our Western culture based on Christianity and Judaism is superior to the islamic culture. Our laws are superior to sharia. Our judeo-christian values are better than islam's totalitarian rules. And because they are superior and better, we must defend them. We must fight for our own identity, or else we will lose it. We need to be warriors for the good, because the good is worth fighting for. Neutrality in the face of evil is evil. Third, we must stop the islamization of our countries. More islam means less freedom. There is enough islam in the West already. We must stop immigration from non-Western countries, which are mostly islamic countries. We must expel criminal immigrants. We must forbid the construction of new hate palaces called mosques. We must also close down all islamic schools because educating children in a spirit of hate is one of the worst things imaginable. We must introduce anti-sharia legislation everywhere in the free world. Enough is enough. Fourth, we must take pride in our nations again. We must cherish and preserve the culture and identity of our country. Preserving our own culture and identity is the best antidote against islamization. And fifth, last but certainly not least, we must elect wise and courageous leaders who are brave enough to address the problems which are facing us, including the threat of islam. Politicians who have the courage to speak the truth about islam. Politicians who dare to denounce the devastating results of the multicultural society. Politicians who - without political correctness - say: enough is enough. You and I, Americans and Europeans, we belong to a common Western culture. We share the ideas and ideals of our common Judeo-Christian heritage. In order to pass this heritage on to our children and grandchildren, we must stand together, side by side, in our struggle against Islamic barbarism. That, my friends, is why I am here. I am here to forge an alliance. Our international freedom alliance. We must stand together for the Judeo-Christian West. We will not allow islam to overrun Israel and Europe, the cradle of the judeo-Christian civilization. My friends, we will stand together. We will stand firm. We will not submit. Never. Not in Israel, not in Europe, not in America. Nowhere. We will survive. We will stop islam. We will defend our freedoms. We will remain free. Thank you.

Liverpool British National Party Activist Arrested for Distributing Labour 25 Labour party paedophiles Leaflet

British National Party Activist Arrested for Distributing Labour 25 Leaflet

    News Team http://bnp.org.uk/

British National Party superactivist Peter Tierney has been arrested for handing out Labour 25 leaflets, which detail the names of 25 convicted Labour party paedophiles.

Adam Walker and Nick Griffin with Peter Tierney today

Mr Tierney was arrested in Liverpool and taken to Belle Vale police station after distributing the leaflets, which name and shame 25 Labour party councillors, mayors and activists who were convicted for crimes such as possession of child pornography and child rape.
The event mirrors that of Merseyside police’s arrest of thirteen British National Party activists in 2008 for distributing the Racism Cuts Both Ways leaflet, which highlights the government-and-media ignored issue of anti-white racism.
Adam Walker, who met with Mr Tierney ahead of a party meeting in Liverpool tonight, said that the police’s heavy-handed reaction clearly showed that the leaflets had struck a cord.
More information about this latest state attack on freedom of speech will follow on this site tomorrow.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.