Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
Sunday, 2 November 2014
Wednesday, 29 October 2014
Sunday, 26 October 2014
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Saturday, 18 October 2014
Friday, 10 October 2014
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
By Stephen Toth
The American government have now tried to hide their aggressive
expansionist policies concerning their constructing a new missile iron
curtain around Russia by seemingly handing the issue over to NATO.
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
By Stephen Toth
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
Tuesday, 7 October 2014
Sunday, 5 October 2014
Saturday, 4 October 2014
Friday, 3 October 2014
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Mediocrity and complete ass hole David Cameron raps to his favourite tune!
Post by Chris Smith.
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
Monday, 29 September 2014
Sunday, 28 September 2014
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
.jpg)
By Alex Proud
Why aren’t the middle classes revolting?
Words you probably never thought you’d read in the Telegraph. Words which, as
a Gladstonian Liberal, I never thought I’d write. But seriously, why aren’t
we seeing scenes reminiscent of Paris in 1968? Moscow in 1917? Boston in
1773?
My current fury is occasioned the Phones4U
scandal (and it really is a scandal).
Phones4U was bought by the private equity house, BC Partners, in 2011 for
£200m. BC then borrowed £205m and, having saddled the company with vast
amounts of debt, paid themselves a dividend of £223m. Crippled by debt, the
company has now collapsed into administration.
The people who crippled it have walked away with nearly £20m million, while
5,600 people face losing their jobs. The taxman may also be stiffed on £90m
in unpaid VAT and PAYE. It’s like a version of 1987’s Wall Street on
steroids, the difference being that Gordon Gecko wins at the end and
everyone shrugs and says, “Well, it’s not ideal, but really we need guys
like him.”
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)