Starmer's Missing Rent Boys

Starmer's Missing Rent Boys  

Contrast the media silence with the firestorm over Prince Andrew

By Nick Griffin Oct 2025

Follow Nick on X 

Follow Nick on Substack

What happened to the three handsome young builders accused of arson attacks on properties connected to TwoTier? If you rely on the mainstream UK media for your news, you’ll have heard nothing since May, when they were charged. Euronews, however, reported last Friday that they had just appeared in court again, only to be remanded once more, with the actual trial not due until April next year.

Here’s the start of that report:

Three men are accused of setting fire to Starmer’s personal home, along with a property where he once lived and a car he had sold.

Two Ukrainian men pleaded not guilty Friday to plotting fires earlier this year at properties linked to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Petro Pochynok, 35, pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between 1 April and 13 May.

They are accused along with another man, Ukraine-born Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, of setting fire to Starmer’s personal home, along with a property where he once lived and a car he had sold.

Carpiuc, 27, did not enter a plea during the hearing at London’s Central Criminal Court.

Above: Photo and caption from Euronews on Friday. Did you see it anywhere else? If you you had problems with a manhole, would you call these chaps to fix it?

Nothing odd here, the court system is overloaded and long waits on remand are normal. Nothing odd, that is, except for the continued lack of MSM interest in what is a truly explosive story.

To many Starmer-haters (and that’s a high proportion of the British people), the answer is clear: Keir is queer and he wouldn’t give them money to buy beer. Or coke. Or whatever it is that vigorous young builders need after doing Village People impressions for unpopular Prime Ministers in the privacy of houses and cars about which normal people know nothing.

But, to be fair, there are other possibilities. So let’s quickly go through them all, one by one:

1. Our PM does indeed have a secret predilection for pretty young builders, aka rent boys, but had some sort of falling out and refused to pay either their fees or blackmail money;

2. They were rent boys and there was a falling out, but with another member of Starmer’s family. Someone close enough for even the one remove to be a huge scandal;

3. No sex was involved. Instead, the three were working for the Russians and targeted Starmer;

4. No sex was involved. Instead, the three were working for the Ukrainian secret service, either to intimate Starmer into continuing to support Zelensky or pretending to be Russians;

5. No sex. No spying. But Keir needed some building work doing on his secret home and, aware of his overwhelming unpopularity with indigenous British builders, decided instead to use a group of young East Europeans recommended by a friend.

If you can think of any other possible reason, do please let me know, but that exhausts my powers of explanation and speculation.

Now, think about each of those possible explanations. What do they all have in common?

That every single one of them is HUGELY newsworthy. Which makes every moment of this case, including brief court appearances like last Friday’s, hugely newsworthy.

Number 1 would lead to Starmer’s immediate departure not just from Downing Street but from political life. Number 2 wouldn’t do, if it wasn’t for his obvious central role in orchestrating an obvious mass media cover up.

Number 3 would be an act of war on British soil. This would only go a little way to balancing the innumerable acts of war Starmer and Co have aided and abetted on Russian soil, but it would be an escalation which threatened to spiral into immediate full-scale war. I don’t know about you, but I think that would be a tad more newsworthy than the leak from Traitors.

Number 4 would mean that the political and media elites’ darling ‘Keeev’ had launched a terrorist attack on Britain, which would be an odd way to thank us for giving them, among other goodies, the whole of the British army’s supply of high-tech howitzers. This really ought to disqualify them from getting any more of our depleted arsenal. And, in passing, be BIG news.

Number 5 would be of no such scandalous or geopolitical newsworthiness, but an admission that a Labour Prime Minister couldn’t find a single white van operation building firm to do a few days’ work without bursting into chants of “Keir Starmer is a w*nker, or hiding dead prawns behind the radiators, would make him the most mocked, as well as the most unpopular, PM in British history.

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. If you like my style or want to help my serious work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

So, whichever explanation you prefer, you will surely agree that the strangest thing of all in this very queer story is that it isn’t a story. That the mass media continue to censor themselves; that they refuse to share this very profitable story with the masses at all.

Is it because of sub judice rules, the need for a fair trial? Well, when TwoTier had hundreds of anti-Southport Massacre protesters arrested and held on bail pending trial, he rushed to tell us what they had done, and how they must be jailed, and the MSM collaborated, providing all the details of their ‘crimes’, with the occasional ‘allegedly’ thrown in by way of legal nicety.

Think of any murder case, sex crime, fraud case, or indeed of any serious crime. Do the media steadfastly refuse to report on developments of the case? Are they barred from speculating as to motives? No. Are they barred from reporting known or suspected details of the case? No. They merely have - very properly - to avoid saying or implying that the accused are guilty, because deciding that is the job of the jury, when it comes to that.

But all they need to do to comply with that rule is to throw in that magic word ‘allegedly’. And that’s what they do. Except when they don’t, as in this case.

Whether this is the result of a ‘D-Notice’, threats and intimidation directed against editors, bribery, or self-censorship, it doesn’t really matter. What does matter is that our wonderful, fearless, independent press and broadcasters are, for some reason at present only known to themselves, conspiring to keep the lid on a case every bit as explosive as that of Prince Andrew.

Yes. Isn’t that interesting. The less than brilliant (but probably not the most stupid) royal hasn’t been found guilty. Indeed he hasn’t even been arrested. But lurid details of what he may or may not of done, and what it might mean for the Monarchy, take up oceans of printers’ ink and hours of TV news coverage.

So why the silence when it comes to TwoTier and the Twinks?

Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. If you agree that the MSM are covering something up to protect Starmer, do your bit to put a crack in the media dam by sharing this post.

Share

SHARE

First Wave Feminists - posh Anglos with too much time and money

First Wave Feminists - posh Anglos with too much time and money 

A further deep dive into the real history of a madness which has poisoned the West

By Nick Griffin oct 2025

Follow Nick on Substack

Follow Nick on X

Feminism is rightly understood by most traditionalists and genuine nationalists to be a major contributor to the “Decline of the West”. As such, it was inevitable that the vastly disproportionate role of radical Jewish women among the proponents of the cultural Marxist revolution of ‘68 would lead to the now quite widespread claim that “feminism was Jewish”.

In fact, as I set out in my first article in this series, Shaking All Over (linked just below in case you missed it first time around), if feminism springs from any religious or ethnic background the people to blame are (nominally) Christian Quakers, and English Quakers at that.

What, however, of later developments?

I have also already published Terrorism for Women (October 2nd). In dealing with the extreme violence of the UK’s Suffragette movemeent, this makes it clear that this very important part of feminist history was impeccably English, and largely upper class English at that.

This essay moves back in time to consider how Quaker “First Generation Feminism” developed and, ultimately, achieved its goals.

If, dear reader, you are someone who is broadly happy with the feminists’ early demands being met, then what follows should be read simply as a piece of history.

On the other hand, you may believe that the entire feminist movement was a dangerous wrong turn for our civilisation. In that case, you should understand that - regardless of the identity of many of the theoriests and harridans of the ‘68 generation - it was a subversive sickness which sprang not from the extremely anti-female tendencies which exist within Judaism, but from a weird sect of heretical Christians, and a gaggle of upper-class Anglo women with too much time and money on their hands.

Shaking All Over

NICK GRIFFIN · SEP 24

As the nation-wrecking impact of the Demographic Winter begins to bite, it is becoming more and more obvious that feminism isn’t a rather daft distraction from more important issues, but actually a key factor in the ongoing collapse of industrial civilisation and the world as we know it. That being the case, we need to know where it came from.

Read full story

The Victorian era saw a major backlash against the fevered theorising of upper class feminists. The Victorian ideal created a dichotomy of “separate spheres” for men and women that were very clearly defined in theory, though not always in reality. In this ideology, men were to occupy the public sphere (the space of wage labour and politics) and women the private sphere (the space of home and children.)

This “feminine ideal”, also called “The Cult of Domesticity”, was typified in Victorian conduct books such as Mrs Beeton’s Book of Household Management and other best-sellers promoting the Victorian feminine ideal. Queen Victoria herself disparaged the concept of feminism, which she described in private letters as the “mad, wicked folly of ‘Woman’s Rights’”.

Yet while the feminist movement seemed to have run out of steam in Britain, it continued to advance in America.

John Neal, brought up a Quaker, slavery abolitionist and teetotaller, is remembered as America’s first women’s rights lecturer. Having failed to make a living selling luxury goods smuggled in from England, Neal – an evil-tempered thug whose short-fuse gave him a life-long tendency to violence – turned to writing and agitation.

Neal’s polemics roused the feminist wave which led to the 1848 Seneca Falls Conference, where hundreds of women met in New York for the first Women’s Rights Convention. The two-day meeting is considered the official beginning of the modern American feminist movement. Most of the women attending the convention were active in Quaker or evangelical Methodist movements.

The ideas of Neal and of the Seneca Falls organisers also filtered back over the Atlantic. They encouraged a group of upper class women who met regularly during the 1850s in London’s Langham Place to discuss the united women’s voice necessary for achieving their aims. These “Ladies of Langham Place” focused on education, employment, and marital law.

Women associated with the group founded the ironically and aptly named Society for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW). Leading advocate for changing of property law, Harriet Taylor married John Stuart Mill in 1853 and provided the liberal theorist with much of the subject material for The Subjection of Women...

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Start trial

A subscription gets you:

	Subscriber-only posts and full archive
	Post comments and join the community

Neil Oliver: The world is bleeding & there’s blood on their hands

To help support this Podcast & get exclusive videos every week sign up to Neil Oliver on Patreon.com   / neiloliver   To Donate go to Neil’s Website: https://www.neiloliver.com To Shop: https://neil-oliver.creator-spring.com YouTube Channel:    / @neil-oliver   Rumble site – Neil Oliver Official: https://rumble.com/c/c-6293844 Instagram - NeilOliverLoveLetter:   / neiloliverloveletter   Podcasts: Season 1: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Season 2: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...

What Can We Take From the Populists? Part 3

 

What Is To Be Cone? Part 3

NICK GRIFFIN  oct 2025 Follow Nick on Substack Follow Nick on X

The populist challenge is so grave - and so full of potential for genuine nationalists to exploit, that I make no apology for setting it out in several separate Substack essays. I know that many readers have only a limited amount of time in their busy days to consider these things, so I’m breaking them up for your. Here is the latest bite!

I am sure that overseas readers will forgive me using the example of Reform, not least because they invariably will see close parallels with the situation in their own countries.

Reform came out of UKIP, a party founded in the 1980s, but four decades of ups and downs, splits and rows with Nigel Farage mean that very few of those involved now have much of a political pedigree.

Among Reform’s older and more senior members, the UKIP old-hands are undoubtedly outnumbered by Tories who have recently jumped ship. When it comes to the grass-roots and to the rapidly growing number of young activists, however, they are more or less new to politics.

As such, they automatically lack any real ideological cohesion or direction. What is more, Farage can do little to put this right: The ability to be all things to all featherless bipeds is central to the appeal of 21st century populism - if they veer too openly towards free market economics (Farage’s natural position as a former stock broker) they risk losing the support of Red Wall Labour voters.

But move towards the old BNP position as “the Labour party your grandparents voted for” and they alienate ex-Conservatives in the shires and suburbs.

Nature, however, abhors a vacuum, and this applies to political movements without an ideology - particularly new ones attracting young people with political ambitions. Quite apart from the intrinsic appeal of having ideological guidelines by which to form and judge policies, ideological differences also both aid and cloak personal and factional ambition - particularly among the young.

I have first-hand experience of this, having been one of the founding group of young militants who, back in 1980 - in our late teens and early twenties - founded a monthly magazine, Nationalism Today, with the express though unstated intention to use it as the vehicle through which to ‘radicalise’ the National Front.

The NF was at the time in splintered ruins after its shattering defeat at the hands of Maggie Thatcher with her empty populist rhetoric about understanding “how the British people feel about being swamped”. It had gone from being poised to become England’s third political party to disillusioned chaos. Its old leadership were busy waging their own three-way civil war.

We were sure that we would be able to build a youthful majority for our distinctly ‘left-nationalism’ and in due course to wrest control of its governing body, but even we didn’t expect to do so in less than three years. Having done so, we spent another three years rebuilding the Front, experimenting with some remarkable initiatives, including community roots campaigns and the creation from scratch of the white music scene.

In the end, for various reasons, it all ended up as nothing more than experience which helped me in my BNP times, but it did also show just how much change a small group of determined young men can make - in the teeth of paranoid hostility from the Old Guard - with all well-thought through and radical nationalist agenda.

I am not suggesting that populist parties such as Reform can be ‘captured’ by a process of infiltration, either by nationalists or by nationalist ideas. They already have serious vetting procedures aimed precisely at preventing this. Farage, for example, has long used the Marxist ‘anti-fascist’ fund-raising business Hope Not Hate to vet the membership of UKIP and Reform for nationalists and politically incorrect social media posts. The number of people barred or expelled as a result runs into many thousands.

The leaders of most of these parties will, again like Farage and the BBC, have done deals with powerful establishment forces, exchanging kid glove treatment for the populists in return for their providing a safety valve for public anger and cutting the ground from under the feet of genuine nationalists.

I reiterate that I am proposing the infiltration of ideas, not of people; the ‘turning’ of individuals, not entire organisations; to use the populist parties as ready-made lakes in which to go fishing, rather than expecting to turn them into our own ponds.

Message Nick Griffin

This ideological infiltration will at times be aided by ‘clean skin’ nationalist activists joining bodies like Reform, keeping their real opinions private and working primarily as ‘spotters’ for individuals who they judge to be open to the ideas contained in specially produced ideological publications of various kinds, which will then be sent to them anonymously.

There is no need for this process to involve a large number of such spotters. The fact is that most up-and-coming populists, the young ones in particular will be potential targets. Reform at present have around 1,000 elected councillors, the majority with no previous serious political affiliation. Even some of those who might well previously have been civnats will be undergoing the same radicalisation and ‘tribalisation’ which is sweeping through the general population.

By the time the next UK general election is over, Reform look set to have had thousands more councillors elected, along with members of the devolved governments, and hundreds of MPs.

It will not take Sherlock Holmes to find physical and email addresses through which to reach these targets for our educational materials. The problem is not reaching them, it is only a matter of producing them and raising the money to put them into their hands.

Taking into account other populist and ‘counter-jihad’ targets in addition to elected Reformists, we could expect to have 5,000 individual targets before the end of this decade. Allowing £5 a head for the cost of printing (videos and e-books will have their roles, but there is still no substitute for hard copy when it comes to long term ideas) and delivering our publications, that gives us the challenge of raising £25,000.

This does mean that I will, in due course, be asking people like you to join, or at least donate to, an organisation with this project as a key part of its overall mission. This is not something which can be put into practice by ‘organisations’ built around a couple of self-proclaimed ‘leaders’ who do little except provide entertainment videos funded by Buy Me a Coffee.

Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale! This series needs to reach a far higher propoertion of serious nationalists than at present. Please help make this happen!

Share

£25,000 is a drop in the ocean compared to what various nationalist parties have spent on elections in the past. Indeed, I would hazard a guess that various people who should know better will between them throw away more than this amount in lost deposits and the cost of leaflets in the next general election.

In any case, the NF and BNP over the years raised and spent literally million of pounds contesting and losing elections. To be fair, some of those efforts helped to build the organisations.

Before the advent of the Internet, the five-minute party political broadcasts which were secured by standing in at least 50 parliamentary seats or many hundreds of council ones, were actually quite an effective way of reaching new people. The free post delivery of election addresses by the Post Office was a similar benefit.

We are now in very different times and circumstances, so it makes far more sense to invest perhaps a twentieth of the cost of one of those old election contests on injecting nationalist ideas right into the heart of the populist movement.

True, some of what we send them will go unread. Some of them will read and reject it. But others will lap it up, while in many more our efforts will surely sow seeds which will germinate and grow in due course.

Such an operation will be new to most nationalists, but it has been undertaken before, with very considerable success. The target was the Labour party, and the ideological infiltration was carried out by the Communist party. the key time, the 1930s and forties. The story was related by the Communist-turned Catholic Douglas Hyde, one-time editor of the Daily Worker, in his excellent book I Believed.

Writing after his conversion, when he had become one of Britain’s most effective anti-Communists, Hyde recounted how, the morning after the massive Labour victory in 1945, sitting in his editorial office in the CP headquarters, he received call after call from men he knew as hardcore Communists, phoning to give him greetings as newly elected Labour MPs.

Of course, there is a serious risk of young nationalists who decide on careers in populiast parties going native, of being corrupted. But many of them are going be following this path anyway, because it’s potentially a good career move for educated young white men facing intense competition in their traditional professions from positive discrimination minorities and AI.

It’s going to be a numbers game - the more we reach, the more we will influence to ome extent or another. And the more we influence, the more will end up being expelled and thus be pushed towards the sort of constructive nationalist campaigns and community initiatives which I will outline later in this series.

This is actually the most important benefit to be had. Whatever the populists or their successors do - there no parliamentary or any other road back to the old ‘normality’, This is why we so urgently need to find and train a new generation of young nationalist cadres, the community leaders who will help inspire and shepherd our people through the dark but opportunity-filled times ahead.

Some, on the other hand, will manage to stay within the populist machines, where nationalist ideas wil not change things drastically, but will here and there nudge them a little further.

Sometimes this may buy us a bit more time, sometimes it may give us a bit of extra protection, sometimes it will simply be a good thing in its own right. Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth!

Further essays in this series will first complete this explanation of the mission to exploit the phenomenon of populism, then we will go on to set out What Is To Be Done in the field of direct nationalist activism. .Subscribe for free to read these. Better still, become a paid subscriber at the highest level you can afford, in order to help provide the resources needed to move all this from Beyond the Pale and turn it into winning reality. Thank you!

Upgrade to paid

You're currently a free subscriber to Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

SHARE

What Is A Good Christian

 

Close your eyes and picture a “good Christian.”

What image comes to mind?

For most people, it’s a gentle, soft-spoken soul. A harmless neighbor who is, above all else, agreeable. In the eyes of the world a “good Christian” is accommodating, quick to apologize, and terrified of offending anyone. This is the caricature drawn by our enemies and praised by the very culture that despises our faith.

We can even give this archetype a face and a name: Ned Flanders. Flanders was never just a silly cartoon character. He was a very small piece of a much larger cultural programming and weaponized fiction operation designed to neuter Christianity. The goal was to render us ridiculous, harmless, and socially acceptable precisely because we were perceived as spiritually impotent clowns. The world is perfectly comfortable with a million Ned Flanders, because they are not a threat.

Sadly this is how many Christians have learned to view themselves. We have embraced the caricature, mistaking politeness for piety and cowardice for kindness. We have accepted a pathetic inversion of the masculine, unapologetic, world-confronting faith that laid the foundations of Western civilization.

The moment a Christian stops acting like Flanders, the world loses its mind. The cognitive dissonance is immediate and violent. The degenerate culture that demanded you be “loving” is enraged when you love people enough to tell them the truth. The world that preached “tolerance” becomes viciously intolerant of your refusal to bow to its idols. They loved the caricature because they could control it. They hate the real thing because they cannot.

As you stand your ground speaking a hard truth without apology the enemies of Christ will look you in the eye and say, with a condescending Reddit-tier smirk: “You know, you really should try to be more Christ-like.”

What do they actually mean by this? What does “Christ-like” look like in their minds? Our enemies have spent a century creating a counterfeit Christ in the cultural imagination. Their Christ is this soft, ethereal, endlessly affirming hippie Mr. Rogers figure. Their Jesus is a divine social worker who would never flip a table, only set up a committee to discuss its placement.

This is the “Christ” they demand we imitate.

But the moment we model the actual Jesus Christ of the Gospels, the mask slips.

When you show righteous anger at the profanation of what is holy, remember that He braided a whip of cords and drove the money-changers from the Temple.

When you publicly rebuke the powerful hypocrites leading people astray, remember that He looked the apostate Jews in the eye and called them a “brood of vipers” and “whitewashed tombs.”

When you speak the hard, exclusive truth that divides families, remember that He declared, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

Suddenly, their tone changes. A look of panic flashes in their eyes as they are confronted not by their harmless made up modern mascot, but by the King of kings and Lord of Lords. They recoil in horror. They don’t want you to be like the real Christ. He is terrifying and makes demands. The want you to go back to being the useful caricature they created for you.

This model of holy confrontation was the standard for the early Church. Were the Apostles passive men seeking the approval of the establishment? Dust off your Bible and read the Book of Acts. You will find Peter and John, before the Jews that murdered their Lord, declaring, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.” You will find Stephen, fearlessly indicting the apostate Jews as stiff-necked murderers before they stoned him to death. You will find Paul, confronting sorcerers, casting out demons, and boldly proclaiming that Jesus is the one true King in a first century world that bowed to Caesar.

These men were not “agreeable.” They were dangerous. In Thessalonica, the apostate Jews agitated crowds and stirred them up before the city rulers, shouting, “These who have turned the world upside down have come here too… acting contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying there is another king—Jesus.” The charge was not that they were too nice, but that they were turning the world upside down by declaring ultimate allegiance to a higher authority.

This brings us to the heart of the matter. Our surrender to the Flanders Fallacy is a symptom of a deeper spiritual rot in the Church. We have a fundamental inversion of authority. For centuries the West understood that Christianity was its bedrock. Society was judged against the standard of Christian truth. Today that has been flipped on its head. Christianity is now judged by how well it serves the secular religion and globalist regime. It is a totalizing religion, and it demands every other belief system bend the knee.

The “good Christian” in the eyes of the world is the one most useful to the globalist project. The “good church” flies the rainbow flag and replaces sermons on repentance with therapeutic platitudes about social justice. They are auditioning for the world’s approval, quoting Scripture that supports their ideology while ignoring the parts that speak of holiness and judgment.

The problem isn’t only on the left with the secularists. We must also reject the definition of a “good Christian” offered by the Zionist heretics who have captured so many of our churches. They command us to bow to the golden calf of a foreign nation-state and a people defined by their 2,000-year rejection of the Messiah. They preach a false gospel that usurps the Church’s identity as the true Israel and hands our spiritual birthright to those who deny the Son.

The Zionist heresy diverts the energy of God’s people and commands them to secure the borders of a foreign land while the spiritual and cultural borders of our own Christian nations collapse. We are called to disciple all nations, most especially to claim our own lands and our own people for the dominion of Christ, not to serve as political chaplains, an on-demand bomb squad, and a piggy bank for a foreign ethnostate and a people that stands in direct opposition to Christ’s throne.

Our faith is not one ideology among many, competing for a seat at the table. It is the throne of reality. Christ is not a consultant, He is the King who judges all nations. We are not here to make the world comfortable in its rebellion against God. We are here to call the world out of its rebellion and into allegiance with its rightful King.

Reject the inversion. Stop seeking a passing grade from a failing system. The era of appeasement is over. It’s time to shed the ridiculous costume the world has tailored for us, find our spines, and speak with the authority of the King we serve.

If the very people who celebrate degeneracy and mock God are praising you, you are doing something wrong. But if they accuse you of turning the world upside down, then you know you are finally on the right track.

A good Christian, a true Christian, is someone who serves the King of kings and thus will not bow to anyone or anything else. He is a soldier whose only marching orders come from the throne of Heaven. He is a builder whose only blueprint is God’s Word. His mission is not to be liked, but to be faithful. He doesn’t want to win the approval of a dying culture, but seeks to forge a new one from its ashes in the name of Christ.

He wields the truth as a sword and is the sworn enemy of every lie that props up the kingdom of darkness, whether it flies a rainbow flag or the star of a foreign power. He is a patriot of the Heavenly Kingdom, and therefore the best patriot for his own nation, because his entire life is dedicated to bringing his home, his people, and his culture under the dominion of its one, rightful King.

This is the good Christian the Apostles would recognize and the Christian our enemies truly fear. The one who doesn’t just believe the world can be turned upside down, but by the grace and power of God is the one doing the turning.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King

If you enjoy our newsletter please consider supporting our efforts to defend faith and freedom. 

Here are all the ways you can support our mission today

Upgrade to GabPRO

Explaining two tier policing in Birmingham | David Starkey Talks... to L...

Join my Members' Club on Patreon   / davidstarkeytalks   or SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/david-s... & follow me on Twitter (X) https://x.com/DrDStarkeyCBE If you upload any David Starkey Talks content, please include a link to this video in the video description and as a pinned comment.