Starmer's Missing Rent Boys
Contrast the media silence with the firestorm over Prince Andrew
 |
What happened to the three handsome young builders accused of arson attacks on properties connected to TwoTier? If you rely on the mainstream UK media for your news, you’ll have heard nothing since May, when they were charged. Euronews, however, reported last Friday that they had just appeared in court again, only to be remanded once more, with the actual trial not due until April next year.
Here’s the start of that report:
Three men are accused of setting fire to Starmer’s personal home, along with a property where he once lived and a car he had sold.
Two Ukrainian men pleaded not guilty Friday to plotting fires earlier this year at properties linked to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Petro Pochynok, 35, pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between 1 April and 13 May.
They are accused along with another man, Ukraine-born Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, of setting fire to Starmer’s personal home, along with a property where he once lived and a car he had sold.
Carpiuc, 27, did not enter a plea during the hearing at London’s Central Criminal Court.
 |
Above: Photo and caption from Euronews on Friday. Did you see it anywhere else? If you you had problems with a manhole, would you call these chaps to fix it?
Nothing odd here, the court system is overloaded and long waits on remand are normal. Nothing odd, that is, except for the continued lack of MSM interest in what is a truly explosive story.
To many Starmer-haters (and that’s a high proportion of the British people), the answer is clear: Keir is queer and he wouldn’t give them money to buy beer. Or coke. Or whatever it is that vigorous young builders need after doing Village People impressions for unpopular Prime Ministers in the privacy of houses and cars about which normal people know nothing.
But, to be fair, there are other possibilities. So let’s quickly go through them all, one by one:
Our PM does indeed have a secret predilection for pretty young builders, aka rent boys, but had some sort of falling out and refused to pay either their fees or blackmail money;
They were rent boys and there was a falling out, but with another member of Starmer’s family. Someone close enough for even the one remove to be a huge scandal;
No sex was involved. Instead, the three were working for the Russians and targeted Starmer;
No sex was involved. Instead, the three were working for the Ukrainian secret service, either to intimate Starmer into continuing to support Zelensky or pretending to be Russians;
No sex. No spying. But Keir needed some building work doing on his secret home and, aware of his overwhelming unpopularity with indigenous British builders, decided instead to use a group of young East Europeans recommended by a friend.
If you can think of any other possible reason, do please let me know, but that exhausts my powers of explanation and speculation.
Now, think about each of those possible explanations. What do they all have in common?
That every single one of them is HUGELY newsworthy. Which makes every moment of this case, including brief court appearances like last Friday’s, hugely newsworthy.
Number 1 would lead to Starmer’s immediate departure not just from Downing Street but from political life. Number 2 wouldn’t do, if it wasn’t for his obvious central role in orchestrating an obvious mass media cover up.
Number 3 would be an act of war on British soil. This would only go a little way to balancing the innumerable acts of war Starmer and Co have aided and abetted on Russian soil, but it would be an escalation which threatened to spiral into immediate full-scale war. I don’t know about you, but I think that would be a tad more newsworthy than the leak from Traitors.
Number 4 would mean that the political and media elites’ darling ‘Keeev’ had launched a terrorist attack on Britain, which would be an odd way to thank us for giving them, among other goodies, the whole of the British army’s supply of high-tech howitzers. This really ought to disqualify them from getting any more of our depleted arsenal. And, in passing, be BIG news.
Number 5 would be of no such scandalous or geopolitical newsworthiness, but an admission that a Labour Prime Minister couldn’t find a single white van operation building firm to do a few days’ work without bursting into chants of “Keir Starmer is a w*nker, or hiding dead prawns behind the radiators, would make him the most mocked, as well as the most unpopular, PM in British history.
Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. If you like my style or want to help my serious work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
So, whichever explanation you prefer, you will surely agree that the strangest thing of all in this very queer story is that it isn’t a story. That the mass media continue to censor themselves; that they refuse to share this very profitable story with the masses at all.
Is it because of sub judice rules, the need for a fair trial? Well, when TwoTier had hundreds of anti-Southport Massacre protesters arrested and held on bail pending trial, he rushed to tell us what they had done, and how they must be jailed, and the MSM collaborated, providing all the details of their ‘crimes’, with the occasional ‘allegedly’ thrown in by way of legal nicety.
Think of any murder case, sex crime, fraud case, or indeed of any serious crime. Do the media steadfastly refuse to report on developments of the case? Are they barred from speculating as to motives? No. Are they barred from reporting known or suspected details of the case? No. They merely have - very properly - to avoid saying or implying that the accused are guilty, because deciding that is the job of the jury, when it comes to that.
But all they need to do to comply with that rule is to throw in that magic word ‘allegedly’. And that’s what they do. Except when they don’t, as in this case.
Whether this is the result of a ‘D-Notice’, threats and intimidation directed against editors, bribery, or self-censorship, it doesn’t really matter. What does matter is that our wonderful, fearless, independent press and broadcasters are, for some reason at present only known to themselves, conspiring to keep the lid on a case every bit as explosive as that of Prince Andrew.
Yes. Isn’t that interesting. The less than brilliant (but probably not the most stupid) royal hasn’t been found guilty. Indeed he hasn’t even been arrested. But lurid details of what he may or may not of done, and what it might mean for the Monarchy, take up oceans of printers’ ink and hours of TV news coverage.
So why the silence when it comes to TwoTier and the Twinks?
Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. If you agree that the MSM are covering something up to protect Starmer, do your bit to put a crack in the media dam by sharing this post.
|
