Search This Blog

Thursday, 27 February 2025

UK Government Dodges Real Issues by Promising Even Stricter Censorship Laws

 Abstract artwork featuring the Union Jack flag with colorful speech bubbles scattered across, creating a dynamic and textured composition.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

It’s anybody’s guess at this point: Are the UK’s majority lawmakers oblivious, defiant, or for some other reason, known only to themselves – “feeling themselves”?

Amid myriad controversies centered on the way the country’s government(s) have been choosing to treat free speech online for a while now – the “pinnacle” of which should have been the highly controversial Online Safety Act – reports now say there are UK parliament members who want yet more censorship laws to be enacted.

But tripling down, at this particular moment in domestic and international politics, why? To what end?

For a cabinet under all sorts of pressure, it might just be a matter of coming up with a negotiating stance, as the figurative waves keep crashing in.

Here’s Minister of State for Data Protection and Telecoms and Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism Chris Bryant – always, at this point embarrassingly, falling back on the nebulous “think-of-the-children” platitude – while sounding like he’s “soothing” not only his voters but also himself:

“I do not doubt for a single instant that this will be the end of the story, that the Online Safety Act will be the end of the story. I will be amazed if there weren’t further legislation in this field in some shape or other in the next two or three years.”

One could choose to look at this flurry of very recent comments from UK officials as vying to gain a “strong” (if that’s possible at this point) negotiating position with the new US administration (which has not been shy to lump in trade tariffs with abuses of free speech).

So the UK officials at this point – instead of addressing the issues at hand – appear to be trying to talk themselves out of the huge predicament that the Online Safety Act is.

Namely, by “threatening” it could get much worse.

And they go very shallow to appear to be deeply trying to dive into their self-imposed “virtuous” online rhetoric – Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden found it within herself to complain that the Online Safety Act, such as it is, does not properly deal with things like, “the myths of the perfect body.”

Talk to the ancient Greeks, not social media, MP Voaden – they were the first to come up with that “myth” thousands of years ago.

But to avoid real-world political issues now at hand, threats are made of making the Online Safety Act even worse than it is, for any number of often flimsy “reasons.”

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Wednesday, 26 February 2025

The Transhumanist Delusion

 

The following is an excerpt from my new book Reclaiming Reality: Restoring Humanity in the Age of AI.

I also recorded a new podcast episode where I read an additional passage from this same chapter: you can listen to it here.

The Transhumanist Delusion

The transhumanist movement is built on a fundamental lie. It promises the evolution of humanity beyond its natural limits, offering a future where man merges with machine, where death is conquered through technology, and where artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence. This vision is presented as inevitable, as the next step in human progress. But at its core, transhumanism is not about progress at all—it is a rebellion against God, an attempt to remake humanity in the image of those who reject the divine order.

Transhumanism is not a new idea. It is simply a modern iteration of the oldest deception in history—the same lie whispered in the Garden of Eden: “You will be like God.” Since the Fall, mankind has sought to escape the constraints of mortality, weakness, and dependency on the Creator. Today, this desire manifests in the belief that technology can free man from suffering, aging, and even death itself. The central delusion of transhumanism is the belief that human consciousness can be uploaded into machines, that the mind is nothing more than a complex set of data that can be transferred into an artificial medium. This idea is rooted in materialism, the false philosophy that denies the soul and reduces human beings to nothing more than biological software. If the mind is just data, then it can be copied, modified, and improved like a computer program. But this is a profound misunderstanding of human nature.

Human consciousness is not a mere function of neural activity; it is the immaterial soul breathed into man by God. A machine, no matter how advanced, can never possess the essence of human personhood. An AI may mimic human responses, generate art, and even engage in convincing conversation, but it does not have a soul. It does not love, it does not pray, and it does not seek after God. No matter how sophisticated artificial intelligence becomes, it will always be an imitation, a counterfeit life without true being.

The transhumanist vision of the future is not one of human flourishing—it is one of enslavement. The promise of digital immortality is a cruel deception, because no person can truly exist apart from the body given to them by God. The desire to escape the limitations of the flesh through technology leads not to liberation, but to the reduction of man into something less than human. If our identity can be stored on a server, then it can also be deleted, modified, and controlled by those who own the technology.

Those who push the transhumanist agenda see themselves as architects of a new reality. They envision a future where AI governs decision-making, where human reproduction is engineered in labs, and where consciousness is no longer tied to biology. Their ultimate goal is to redefine what it means to be human, not in accordance with God’s design, but according to their own ideological whims. This is not progress; it is a direct assault on the image of God in man. The consequences of this ideology are already visible. Increasingly, people view their bodies as obstacles to be overcome rather than as gifts to be stewarded. The rapid rise of gender ideology, bioengineering, and human enhancement technologies reflects a culture that no longer accepts human nature as given. If the body is seen as something that can be altered at will, then it is only a short step toward accepting the idea that humanity itself should be “upgraded” to fit the demands of a technological society.

Christians must reject this deception outright. We are not machines to be optimized. Our worth is not in our intelligence, our physical abilities, or our ability to integrate with AI. Our worth is found in the fact that we are created by God, for God, and in the image of God. The goal of the Christian life is not to transcend human nature, but to redeem it through Christ. While transhumanists seek immortality through technology, Christians already possess the promise of eternal life—not through machines, but through the resurrection of the body in Christ. This is the great divide between transhumanism and Christianity. One seeks eternity through silicon and software, the other through grace and redemption. One places its faith in human innovation, the other in divine providence. One seeks to replace God, the other submits to Him.

We must resist the push toward transhumanist ideology by firmly grounding ourselves in biblical anthropology. We must teach our children that their bodies are not mistakes to be corrected but gifts to be honored. We must reject any attempt to redefine human nature according to the standards of AI engineers and secular philosophers. And most importantly, we must remind the world that true life—eternal, glorious, and incorruptible—does not come from technology, but from Christ alone. Transhumanism is a false gospel, promising salvation through machines rather than through the blood of Christ. It is a modern-day Tower of Babel, an attempt to ascend to heaven by human effort rather than through faith. But like every rebellion against God, it will ultimately fail. Those who trust in the Lord will inherit eternal life—not as digital consciousness, not as AI-augmented beings, but as resurrected and glorified children of God.

Silicon Valley’s most influential leaders promote a dangerous vision of technological progress that threatens human dignity at its core. Their philosophy boils down to three destructive ideas. First, they worship speed and growth above all else, treating ethical concerns as obstacles to “innovation.” This “progress at any cost” mindset justifies breaking moral and social norms if it means advancing artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, or brain-computer interfaces faster. Second, they view ordinary human limitations—aging, fatigue, the need for sleep and relationships—as problems to eliminate through technology rather than intrinsic parts of what makes us human. Their ultimate goal appears to be replacing flawed biological humans with enhanced transhumans or pure machine intelligence. Third, they idolize market forces and technological inevitability, claiming unregulated capitalism and AI development will naturally create utopia—a naive faith that ignores how power consolidates in the hands of those controlling the technology.

The dominant techno-optimist ideology of our time—a reckless fusion of Nietzschean will-to-power, accelerationist dogma, and neoliberal market absolutism—is not just misguided but fundamentally anti-human. It does not seek to serve humanity but to surpass it, viewing human beings as a temporary evolutionary step toward a post-biological order. Its adherents do not merely disrupt industries; they aim to rewrite human nature itself, treating moral limits as obsolete constraints and communities as relics to be dismantled. Beneath their utopian rhetoric lies a nihilistic project: the replacement of embodied souls with disembodied data, of sacred life with machine logic.

Click here to keep reading the rest of the excerpt on Gab News

Please grab your copy of Reclaiming Reality on Amazon today: here is the Amazon link

Visit ReclaimingReality.com to read excerpts from the book and listen to the Reclaiming Reality podcast where I read these excerpts and discuss chapters in detail. 

Please share a link to the book with your friends, family, and your pastor or priest.

MOST IMPORTANTLY: Please leave a review on the Amazon page! Reviews are crucial for boosting visibility and climbing the charts. Honest feedback from the Gab community will make a HUGE difference!

The world you knew is disappearing. This book is a call to action, a manifesto for those who refuse to surrender their minds, their souls, or their future to an algorithmic tyranny. Join me in Reclaiming Reality. Let's build something better together!

God bless,

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ is King


Neil Oliver: ‘…they’re Internet Peeping Toms!!!

…a preserved brain, stealing our data & prying into our privacy – the digital cage is closing in!!!’ To help support this channel & get exclusive videos every week sign up to Neil Oliver
on Patreon.com   / neiloliver   Website: https://www.neiloliver.com Shop - check out my t-shirts, mugs & other channel merchandise: https://neil-oliver.creator-spring.com Rumble site – Neil Oliver Official: https://rumble.com/c/c-6293844 YouTube Channel:    / @neil-oliver   Instagram - NeilOliverLoveLetter:   / neiloliverloveletter   Podcasts: Season 1: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Season 2: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...

Sunday, 23 February 2025

Now It Makes Sense... “Europe Is Being BURNT To The Ground!” | Neil Oliver

 

Europe is no longer safe – not because of war, but because of those in power who want to erase its identity and independence. Neil Oliver warns that mass migration, censorship, and the Ukraine war are ALL part of a bigger agenda. Is this all leading toward a controlled collapse? Is Europe being set up for disaster? Keep up to date with GB News at gbnews.com or on X @GBNEWS

Friday, 21 February 2025

No One Wants To Admit It THIS About Ukraine | Neil Oliver & Col Douglas ...

Douglas Macgregor sits down with GB News to discuss the real story behind Ukraine, the decline of globalism, and whether Europe and the West can recover from their current crises. Are we heading toward a new world order, or total economic ruin? Watch now as Douglas Macgregor breaks down the biggest global issues of our time.

Thursday, 6 February 2025

Neil Oliver: Grubbiness, greed & corruption!

they’re telling us lies from beginning to end!!! To help support this channel & get exclusive weekly videos sign up to Neil Oliver on Patreon.com   / neiloliver   Rumble site – Neil Oliver Official: https://rumble.com/c/c-6293844 YouTube Channel:    / @neil-oliver   Website: https://www.neiloliver.com Shop - check out my t-shirts, mugs & other channel merchandise: https://neil-oliver.creator-spring.com Instagram - NeilOliverLoveLetter:   / neiloliverloveletter   Podcasts: Season 1: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Season 2: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...

Monday, 3 February 2025

The Far Away People and the Toolmakers Son

Toxic Feminine Energy is Destroying Europe

Modernity sees masculinity and femininity as 'cultural constructs' to be destructed and Europe has been committed to this process for decades now, yet instead of bringing a world of equality and peace, it's created a dangerous continent that's falling into dystopia and tyranny. How can we combat this suicidal turn? Substack 👉: https://richardthefourth.substack.com/ Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/richardthefo... Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/RichardTheFou... Twitter/X: https://x.com/RichardTheIIII

Saturday, 1 February 2025

We Are NOT the Same!

Not everything you've been told about humanity’s origins and our differences is true—and that’s not a bad thing. In this video, I explore the myths we’ve been fed about being "all the same" and explore what science, history, and culture really say about who we are, where we came from, and why our differences should be celebrated—not erased. From ancient migrations to modern-day cultural clashes, it’s time to question the narrative and uncover the truth.

Wednesday, 29 January 2025

Neil Oliver: What Next!!!

To help support this channel & get exclusive weekly videos sign up to Neil Oliver on Patreon.com   / neiloliver   Rumble site – Neil Oliver Official: https://rumble.com/c/c-6293844 YouTube Channel:    / @neil-oliver   Website: https://www.neiloliver.com Shop - check out my t-shirts, mugs & other channel merchandise: https://neil-oliver.creator-spring.com Instagram - NeilOliverLoveLetter:   / neiloliverloveletter   Podcasts: Season 1: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The British Isles Season 2: Neil Oliver's Love Letter To The World Available on all the usual providers https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...

Saturday, 25 January 2025

Chapter 4 - A Century of Struggle: Rothschild versus the People

Wikipedia • The Rothschild family is a wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt. The family's documented history starts in 16th-century Frankfurt; its name is derived from the family house, Rothschild, built by Isaak Elchanan Bacharach in Frankfurt in 1567.

Chapter 3 - Napoléon and the Banque de France


0:00 Chapter 3 - Napoléon and the Banque de France 0:18 France under the Bourbons 4:50 Napoléon the Monetary Reformer 6:51 The State Bank of the French Empire 14:16 Achievements of the French State Banking System

Chapter 2 - The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England

Download full video here: https://archive.org/download/a-histor... 0:00 Chapter 2 - The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England 0:21 Ancient England 1:30 First Jewish Migration and Expulsion 5:18 The Glorious Middle Ages 9:12 End of a Golden Era 10:43 Cromwell and the English Civil War 12:42 The Regicide of King Charles I 14:34 Second Jewish Migration 19:10 Establishment of the Bank of England 23:21 War and Debt Slavery in Perpetuity 28:52 Nationalisation

Chapter 1 - How Usury Destroyed the Roman Empire


0:00 Chapter 1 - How Usury Destroyed the Roman Empire 1:38 The Copper Age (753 – 267BC) 4:20 The Silver Age (267 – 27BC) 6:48 The Jewish Role in the Collapse 7:34 Julius Caesar 10:51 The Gold Age (27BC – 476AD) 13:25 Role of the Church in the Decline and Fall 14:30 Consequences

Tuesday, 31 December 2024

Be "Racist" or Be Replaced ?

 


Over the weekend I sent out a simple post that started a firestorm. The context of when I sent this post is important, so let’s start there. Amidst a raging week long debate about immigration all over the internet, people who were arguing in favor of hiring Americans over foreign H-1B workers were being called “racists,” myself included.


Words like “racism” have been so grossly misused and abused over the past few decades that they have lost all real meaning. They have become nothing more than weapons of political correctness, used to silence and demonize anyone who dares to dissent from the prevailing leftist orthodoxy. The term “racism” has also been specifically weaponized against White people. In its contemporary usage, “racism” is essentially synonymous with in-group preference.

Every other race and ethnic group on the planet engages in in-group preference, favoring their own kind in various aspects of life such as employment, neighborhoods, social circles, mate selection, and yes—even the church they attend. One of my favorite clips to illustrate this is the infamous Muhammad Ali “Blue birds fly with blue birds” interview.

And there is nothing wrong with this, I have no problem with other races having an in-group preference. This was the norm for every racial group for all of human history until about five minutes ago when Whites decided to embrace suicidal levels of altruism and atomized individualism. This self-destructive behavior, if not addressed, will have long-lasting effects on the future of the White race and thus Western civilization itself. We simply cannot afford being afraid to state this obvious fact out loud anymore.

My main problem is with the double standard.

When a Jewish, Black, Hispanic, or Asian organization lobbies for policies that benefit their communities, that is not considered “racist” by any stretch of the imagination by our society, but when Whites exhibit the same in-group preference, they are labeled as “racists” or “White supremacists.” This distortion of the term “racism” is deeply deceptive. It implies that Whites having in-group preference is inherently malicious and irrational, driven solely by a hatred of other races.

This is a gross mischaracterization. In-group preference does not necessitate a venomous animosity towards other races simply because of their ancestry. It is a natural human tendency that has served to maintain the integrity and cohesion of various communities throughout time.

Even in the supposedly “enlightened” cities of the West, we see clear examples of in-group preference and ethnic enclaves. Neighborhoods like Chinatown, Little Italy, and others are designated areas where people of a particular ethnic or cultural background tend to congregate and live together.

There is nothing inherently wrong or “racist” about this. In fact, it is a completely natural and understandable human tendency. People often feel more comfortable and at home among those who share their language, culture, and traditions. Ironically, this is especially true for immigrant communities who may feel alienated and out of place in a predominantly foreign environment.

The existence of ethnic enclaves and nations is a simple fact of life that we should accept and embrace, not demonize and pathologize. It is a reminder that, despite all our attempts to create a “colorblind” society, human beings are inherently tribal creatures who will always be drawn to those who are most like themselves.

The true significance of in-group preference lies in its role as a mechanism for survival and prosperity. When Whites fail to prioritize their own group interests, they leave themselves vulnerable to displacement, replacement, and eventual destruction at the hands of other groups that have no qualms about pursuing their own self-interests.

It is essential for Whites to recognize and understand the importance of in-group preference, not to foster hate or animosity towards other races, but to ensure the continued survival and flourishing of our people and nations. We can, should, and have every right to embrace and advocate for our own interests.

Christians today often conflate the spiritual kingdom, where believers are united in Christ, with the earthly kingdom, which is the realm of human society and government that we share with non-believers. This confusion can lead to misunderstandings and problems. In the spiritual realm, we are all part of the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:12-27). We are united by our faith in Jesus Christ and our shared identity in Him. 

We are called to love and care for one another, regardless of our differences (John 13:34-35; Romans 12:10). We are also called to live according to the principles and values of the kingdom of God (Matthew 6:33; Romans 14:17).However, in the earthly realm, we live in a world that is still marked by sin and rebellion against God (Romans 3:23; Ephesians 2:1-3). 

This means that there are real differences between Christians and non-believers, as well as between different nations, cultures, and people groups. These differences are not accidental, but are part of God’s plan and design for the world. Pretending that these differences can somehow be erased in the earthly realm is the folly of the egalitarian worldview. Standing idly by while God’s enemies seek to destroy these differences in favor of a uniform, utopian sameness is not acceptable.

As one example of the very real differences–even between Christians– in the civil spehre, the voting patterns of evangelical Christians in the United States exhibit a significant racial divide. While White evangelicals have consistently shown strong allegiance to the Republican Party, with approximately 85% identifying as or leaning toward Republicans, the voting behavior of Black evangelical Christians is markedly different. Historically Black Protestant denominations, which often share similar theological characteristics, overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates. In recent elections, upwards of 80-90% of Black Protestant voters have cast their ballots for Democratic candidates.

This can also be observed by the fact that majority Black, Asian, Hispanic, and White churches exist. It’s telling that despite our spiritual unity in Christ, the vast majority of us choose to worship with people who share our kinship and culture. There’s nothing wrong with this. It doesn’t mean we are any less united spiritually as brothers and sisters in Christ, but to deny that these differences and preferences exist is to deny reality itself.

We should celebrate the unique contributions that each person and people group brings to the table, recognizing that God has designed us with distinct strengths, weaknesses, and perspectives. Rather than seeking to erase our differences or pretend that none exist, we should strive to understand and appreciate them, leveraging our differences to glorify God and serve one another.

In Romans 9:3, Paul reveals the depth of his profound love and devotion to his ethnic kin, the Israelites. This verse stands as one of the most heartfelt and self-sacrificial expressions of love in the New Testament. Paul declares, “For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people, those of my own race.” Here, Paul conveys the extent of his anguish over the spiritual condition of his people, showing that his love for them is so intense that he would willingly endure eternal separation from Christ if it could lead to their salvation.

This sentiment echoes the heart of Christ Himself, who demonstrated sacrificial love by laying down His life for humanity, including his own people who rejected him. While Paul knows that such a wish cannot be fulfilled—since salvation is a personal matter between an individual and God—his statement reflects the deep burden he carries for the Israelites as his people. He recognizes their unique role in redemptive history, as they were entrusted with the covenants, the law, the temple worship, and the lineage of the Messiah (Romans 9:4-5). Yet, despite these blessings, many of them had rejected Christ as the fulfillment of God’s promises and they are the ones who had him killed.

Paul’s declaration also underscores the tension he experiences as a Jew who has embraced Christ. Though he is now an apostle to the Gentiles, his love for his own people has not diminished. Instead, his heart breaks over their spiritual blindness, and he yearns for their reconciliation with God. His statement is not merely a rhetorical flourish; it is a window into his deep intercessory spirit and unwavering commitment to the salvation of his people, even at great personal cost.

This passage challenges believers to examine the depth of their own love and concern for others, especially those within their own communities or ethnic groups. Paul’s example calls for a selfless, Christ-like love that prioritizes the eternal well-being of others over personal comfort or security. It is a reminder that genuine love is willing to bear great burdens for the sake of others, reflecting the heart of God, who desires that all people come to a saving knowledge of the truth (1 Timothy 2:4).

My post is not a call for hatred or division, but rather a call for White people to engage in self-preservation and the pursuit of a prosperous future for their own like everyone else. So make the choice, and it is absolutely a binary choice—you can be “racist” or you can be replaced by those who are.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Christ is King