Search This Blog

Wednesday 12 October 2016

U.S. Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLOURS


U.S. Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLOURS


The United States has been caught repainting several of their fighter jets in RUSSIAN Air Force Colors.  Training?  Or are they preparing to launch a horrific bombing inside Syria, then blaming it on the Russians as a precursor to US military action inside Syria?
Remember history: On April 15, 1961, a group of Cuban exiles took off from Nicaragua in a squadron of American B-26 bombers, painted to look like stolen Cuban planes, and conducted a strike against Cuban airfields. So we have known for decades that the US federal Government is full of snakes and vipers.  Don't put anything past these filth.
By repainting these fighter jets, they can send them out on bombing missions, make certain they fly low and slow around a target a few times so people on the ground whip out their cellphone cameras to video the attack, bomb the hell out of something and then sit back as all the civilian videos come out on social media showing a "Russian" plane committing the act!  The perfect set up.
Now that we're revealing this, look for someone to come out and claim it is for something like "training" but who needs to repaint planes for training?  We have all sorts of electronics to Identify Friend-Foe (IFF).  This enables us to fight at night, in bad weather . . . . zero visibility.  So why repaint a plane for "training?" 
Read full article here

U.S. Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLOURS

Tuesday 11 October 2016

Why Jesus Is Greater Than Religion || Spoken Word

UKIP LEADERSHIP VIEWS

By
Christopher Michael Baksa
I think most people agree Steven Woolfe would be an excellent choice in being the next UKIP leader in making the Party more progressive.
However should the NEC prevent Steven being nominated, again, for leader of the party, I would like to know your feeling of us encouraging Nathan Gill to stand.
Nathan was sorn in England, his family moved to Wales in the early 1980s. Educated at Ysgol David Hughes and then Coleg Menai, on leaving the latter he joined a family-owned private company based in North East England.
In March 2004 Gill founded and managed Burgill Ltd, with his mother Elaine. Registered in Llangefni, Isle of Anglesey but operating solely in Kingston upon Hull, the company provided domiciliary and home care services mainly to Hull City Council. The company employed 180 staff, mainly from central Europe (mainly Poland) and the Philippines, to which they optionally provided chargeable "bunkhouse"-style accommodation. In a later interview with the Western Mail after his election, Gill commented.
“ UKIP has never said it wants to stop all immigration – it wants to limit the numbers. People from overseas were employed because caring companies could not find workers to do the jobs. Natan had a care home of his own, but mostly his workers were employed on home care contracts they had with Hull City Council and other organisations. The workers were paid more than the minimum wage, but not massively more. The amount they could afford to pay was determined by the amount of money they received from the council. He says Working in care is quite tough and apparently processes a big turnover of staff.
In July 2012, he came last in the election of councillor for the Llanbedrgoch electoral division.
In May 2013, he led the UKIP group of candidates in the Anglesey local elections, which included his wife, Jana Gill (standing for Canolbarth Môn), and his sister, Jayne Gill (for Aethwy). Nathan himself stood to be elected as councillor for the new electoral division of Seiriol, but he came in eighth place with 7% of the vote. The party did not win any seats on the island's council.
In August 2013, he came third behind Plaid Cymru's Rhun ap Iorwerth in the National Assembly for Wales by-election for Ynys Môn.
With John Bufton stepping down as MEP in 2014, Gill was selected as UKIP candidate number one for Wales in the European Parliament Election and held on to the seat for the party.
During the UK Independence Party Wales Conference on 6 December 2014, Nigel Farage, Leader of UK Independence Party, announced that Gill would be the Leader of the Party in Wales. During the 2015 general election campaign, Gill represented UKIP in the ITV Welsh TV Leaders debate. During the election campaign, Gill denied human involvement in climate change, comments which were strongly criticised by other leaders.
In the 2016 Assembly election Gill won a seat representing the North Wales region. He was beaten to the post of leader of the UKIP group in the National Assembly for Wales by former Conservative MP Neil Hamilton, in a move which Gill described as "bizarre". Nigel described the move as an "unjust act of deep ingratitude" resulting in Hamilton dismissing Farage as simply an "MEP for South East England who's opinions were "irrelevant".

Sunday 2 October 2016

Theresa May set a fixed date to invoke Article50.

BY Christopher Michael Baksa


Under a round of increasing pressure from Vote Leave UK and her own party jumping to our tune, today Theresa May set a fixed date to invoke #Article50.

But can anyone believe what the snakish PM has to say about anything, let alone triggering Art50? Theresa May is renowned for lying and has been caught out lying repeatedly about migration when she was Home Secretary.

The argument goes: ‘I’ll set a fixed date for Art50 and hopefully the stupid Brexiteers won’t notice my plan to keep Britain in the EU by transposing Brussels law into British law. They’re so desperate for Art50, they won’t be able to see me straight.’

Of course, her devious plan has succeeded to a certain extent but only with about 35% of Leavers. The vast majority have not swallowed it and they stay loyal to complete Brexit and the campaign led by Vote Leave  UK.

Tyrant Theresa thought she’d come up with a winner, designed to split the Brexit camp and appease her Remain puppet masters at the same time. But May is not fooling the majority with this treacherous plan to keep Britain in the EU.

Why would Britain stay in the EU even after Brexit-lite? Let’s be unequivocal on this point, May is only offering Brexit-lite not the real deal. The answer is simple inasmuch retaining EU law means we remain in the EU because our laws are identical, framed in Brussels by foreigners with no interest in freedom.

At the referendum, the issue was to reject the EU completely or adopt it entirely by surrendering every last vestige of sovereignty. 52% voted to reject the EU completely, they did not vote for Brexit-lite and certainly not for transposition of EU law onto our statute book.

Deceitful May argues we can “pick and choose later which laws to repeal and those we keep.” This is nonsense because when she talks about repealing the ECA 1972, all EU law could and should be repealed at the same time.

It is infantile to claim not to know what is and is not EU-derived law. The regime knows exactly what is EU law – everything that came from Brussels after 1972 – and a “pick and choose” arrangement is not tenable.

Would another Tory regime led by a Remain fanatic want to repeal any EU law? Of course not and UKIP supporters that think their party is heading for power are just as deluded as Anna Soubry’s Open Britain mob.

There is of course another reason for transposition, not just to appease Remain but actually to keep all EU law because the last redoubt delusion of the Remainiacs is that one day – in Utopia – they will take Britain back into the EU and with the legal infrastructure still in place, their task will be easier, a seamless transposition.
Therefore, it is paramount to repeal all EU law – this is what 52% voted for – to ensure we are truly independent and to prevent the Remainiacs from ever taking us back into the EU.

In fact, we need a law that stipulates that it is treason to attempt to surrender our national sovereignty to a foreign power and that anyone arguing for such a move is subject to prosecution under The Treason Act. This would effectively bury the entire Remain movement overnight and that is our objective at VoteLeaveUK.

So are we heading for Brexit? Absolutely not, all the hard evidence proves we’re not even getting Brexit-lite but rather Brexit-bite which means a taste of Brexit and nothing more.

Mad May has said she will not send back the EU migrant surge – aka immigration invasion – and has indicated she wants to retain access to the single market and that means open borders. She claims that no more than 30,000 EU workers will be allowed to enter the country each year, which is 30,000 too many.

This is not Brexit, it is not what the 52% voted for and we are not accepting Brexit-lite and Brexit-bite quite frankly will lead to open civil war.

An Irish Eurosceptic told me recently: “The best thing about civil war is that it produces a definite answer.”

If Theresa May continues to behave like a tyrant, dictating to everyone, her own party included, then perhaps the Irish Eurosceptic solution is on the cards.

Theresa May lost the referendum, she was on the defeated side but she behaves like she won a Landslide at the EU ref and no one can question her.

At Vote Leave UK, we have now reached the end game with Theresa May and her Tory tyranny with a deep vein of treason running through its black heart, needs to be removed. Our objective is to compel an early General Election and May’s timetable for Art50 is now irrelevant.

Transposing EU law into British law means we are not leaving the EU. The only solution therefore is to force Theresa May to leave 10 Downing Street because she has no mandate from the people, no one elected her PM, she was hand-picked by Tory traitors.

Operation Beacon will be launched on 1 February at the latest, hopefully sooner to ensure we get what we voted for, we voted for complete-Brexit and we are going to get it by any means necessary.

VoteLeave UK.

Wednesday 28 September 2016

Capitalism Is Jewish Usury And History

Capitalism Is Jewish Usury

Orifional Posting by on June 5, 2014 At  Real Currencies
William III, who made the migration of Jewish Finance from Amsterdam to London possible (Left: William III of Orange, who made the migration of Jewish Capitalism from Amsterdam to Britain possible.)
Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is ‘return on investment’. This is an extension of the ‘time value’ of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury. 
Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it unavoidable that the very richest own everything in generations. 
And this is indeed what happened: Capitalism is one huge global monopoly. All the major banks own each other and most Transnationals plus a huge chunk of land. This juggernaut was built with the plunder of Usury.
We have all seen that Rothschild was worth 50 billion in 1850. At 5% per year, this fortune would now be a trillion, at 8% per year Rothschild would now be worth hundreds of trillions.
This is why it has been said that ‘compound interest is the strongest force in the Universe’.
This is Usurious Usurpation.
The Rise of Capitalism
Modern Capitalism was first clearly visible in the Dutch Republic, where Italian Banking, expelled Iberian Jews, the Reformation, naval power and the acquisition of huge trade fortunes came together in the Amsterdam Empire, which would outshine its much bigger Spanish, British and even French competitors until the mid seventeenth century.
Everything that defines modern Capitalism was either invented or came to fruition in Amsterdam. The first Stock Exchange, Multinationals (the East Indies Company, which would rule over Indonesia with unrestrained Corporatocracy for centuries), and most importantly, a Central Bank, the ‘Amsterdamsche Wisselbank’. And of course a huge pile of money, that would be the envy of Europe even long after its ‘glory’ had subsided.
Up to 2500 guilders (estates could be bought for that kind of money) were paid for a single Viceroy Tulip bulb at the peak . "A Satire of Tulip Mania' depicts speculators as brainless monkeys.
Up to 2500 guilders (estates could be bought for that kind of money) were paid for a single Viceroy Tulip bulb at the peak . “A Satire of Tulip Mania’ depicts speculators as brainless monkeys.
Amsterdam also saw the first bubble: the Tulip mania, 1637. This typical banker device, blowing bubbles with easy credit and then popping them by calling in loans, would haunt Western economies for centuries to come.
The Dutch Republic resulted from a Calvinist rebellion against Catholic Spain. Calvin is considered by many to have been Jewish. He openly defended Usury. This was in an era that the Medieval era of Usury prohibition was in terminal decline.
Calvinist thought was also infected by the typically Jewish notion that wealth is a sign of God’s favor.
Notwithstanding Usury prohibition, Jewish Usury had been a huge issue throughout the Middle Ages and it does not require a great leap of the imagination to see that Capitalism is in fact the modern equivalent of what was once known as Jewish Usury.
Jewish fortunes and their methods played a large part in Amsterdam. Their ships would also dominate the growing slave trade on America. They had come from Spain, after being expelled in 1492. Holland was known at the time for its ‘tolerance’.
Amsterdam was the first great star of high finance. Opulence acquired through trade became Capital, looking for returns. And here we see that Capitalism is about finance, not production or consumption. Finance rules over producers, workers, consumers, farmers, crafstmen and industrialists alike.
They lend to those they control or want to control and withhold credit to those for whom they have no purpose. Usury gives them their take of any venture. By keeping money scarce, they keep labor cheap. This is how money rules.
Moving on to Britain
Amsterdam peaked in 1648, when the peace of Westphalia ended both the 80 year war for independence with Spain and the 30 year war in Germany. But after the peak comes the decline and already in the fifties problems began to mount when Cromwell landed a blow on Dutch naval supremacy with the Acts of Navigation.
The Jews had been expelled from Britain in 1290. This was a few decades after the Magna Carta, which clearly points at Jewish Usury as a huge problem at the time.
Cromwell, who was a calvinist Puritan, negotiated extensively with Amsterdam Jews about resettlement. He probably was a tool of Jewish/Amsterdam finance to begin with.
Resettlement came with the promise of making London a better Amsterdam. And while British merchants (and many others too) were against the readmittance of the Jews, Cromwell went ahead anyway. The Puritans were optimistic and naive and thought they could ‘redeem’ the Jews. But while Jewish Capital indeed pushed Britain’s Empire to unprecedented heights, there was no redemption: by the end of the 19th century the British Aristocracy had been entirely Judaized.
While Cromwell, as a tool of Amsterdam Imperialism, ultimately failed, the Jews did not relent and they had a second shot at London with the Glorious Revolution, when William III of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, became William III of Britain and the Dutch Republic and England were united in a personal union.
He repaid his financial backers by chartering the Bank of England in 1694 and this was the official entry of Capitalism in Britain. It came with the end of sovereign money and the ascent of Gold: until then the British economy had been financed with Talley Sticks, simple pieces of wood issued by the King. British partners in the Bank paid for their shares with them, but the first thing the Bank did was take them out of circulation. The Bank of England is only the eigth bank in history and is the second oldest to survive today.
The United States
The real history of the United States is not about the War of Independence and the Constitution. It’s about banking.
The United States did not revolt over ‘taxes without representation’. According to Benjamin Franklin the real reason for the War of Independence was that Whitehall forced scarce money through Britain’s Gold Standard on the Colonies, who had thrived with their own Colonial Scrip. A depression was the inevitable result.
Only a few years after nominal independence, Hamilton’s first Bank of the United States brought Capitalism to the United States. It was closed in 1800, but in 1816, in the aftermath of the war with Britain, a second Bank of the United States (a privately owned corporation) was opened with a 20 year charter.
The heroic President Andrew Jackson did not renew this charter and miraculously survived an attempt on his life. His last words, ‘I killed the Bank’ still ring triumphantly through the ages. Unfortunately, he failed to replace it with a decent monetary system and the country was plunged in a depression because of a tanking money supply.
This left the Whigs, Abraham Lincoln prominently among them, plenty of scope to campaign for a new ‘National’ Bank, which came in the aftermath of the Civil War.
In 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank was founded. This privately owned corporation is owned by primarily Jewish ‘member banks’. The presidents of the Federal Reserve are always Jewish and by far most of its board members are too. It’s no secret Wall Street is run by the  Jews and is now the global standard bearer of Jewish Usury with derivatives being the scam du jour.
Of course there are Americans in Wall Street too, just as there are Englishmen in the City or Germans in Deutsche Bank, but whereas these nationalities compete amongst each other, the Jews are strong in all nations and this gives them supremacy.
Equally true is that the Jewish many gain nothing from the banking prowess of their ‘elites’. They may have some privileges, but on the other hand they’re also easily duped into nasty affairs or sacrificed like the pawns we all are.
But considering the above history of Capitalism and Jewish Usury, it is very hard to avoid the conclusion that they are the same thing.
Conclusion
YHVH emphatically orders the Jews several times to conquer the world with Usury in Deutoronomy, for instance: “15:6 For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee.”
Pivotal documents from the medieval era squarely point at Jewish Usury. We have already mentioned the Magna Carta, but there is also for instance the Quran: ‘That they (the Jews) took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men’s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment.’ (sura 4.161)
Capitalism and its ‘return on investment’ is clearly the successor of medieval Jewish Usury. It arose during the destruction of medieval Usury prohibition. Its typical devices, Usury, Banking, the Stock Exchange, asset bubbles, Transnationals, all were already present in Amsterdam. It was this force that migrated to Britain and the US. It was in these three financial Empires that Captitalism showed its unrestrained imperialist designs.
Already the poor lose up to 50% of their income to Usury, mostly passed on by producers in prices. The middle classes are somewhat better off, but they are being decapitated everywhere. Usury only benefits the richest 10%, while most of the money ends up with the ‘fabulously’ wealthy.
The enslavement is total: most people work the first two and half days of the week to pay off the bank. Even if they have no debts.
And we face not only enslavement, but extinction. Mass immigration, combined with the demographic catastrophy caused by the trinity of feminism, the not-so-gay lobby, and sexual ‘liberation’, is now threatening to actually destroy the white race. Whites are expected to be a minority all over the West in 2050/2060 and irrelevant by the end of the century.
Capitalism is the core of the Jewish Question. All their other depravities, including Zionism and (Cultural) Marxism were built and financed from the Capitalist powerbase.
The Jewish Question can only be reasonably resolved by reforming money and ending its rule through Usury.
Related:
Is Anti Usury Activism Antisemitic?
Babylon = Usury! We want Interest-Free Money!
Demystifying the ‘Conspiracy’
Why Do People Have Difficulty Seeing The Jewish Question?
Rationalizing Usury: the Time Value Hoax