How the State tries to Manipulate YOU
Why Nightlights and Teddy Bears Appear in Response to Imported Atrocities
|
| ||||
 |
“We want controlled spontaneity” – the cynical control techniques of a desperate regime on show in Britain
Law enforcement agencies, including the police departments, fire brigade, ambulance service and councils all use social media to share updates during emergencies. But their actions can go beyond the straightforward imparting of information and leap into efforts to ‘massage’ the public response. Our liberal masters have become very skilled at manipulating public opinion.
This article examines how they do it - and raises the question of how ‘we’ - and here I’m addressing my ethno-nationalist audience -in turn need to respond.
Activists on both ends of the political spectrum can point to examples of how the authorities use and abuse social media to manipulate the public, but those who are concerned by the deliberate downplaying of racial motivation in the victimising of white people seem to have the most reason to feel aggrieved.
The British state has long been the biggest real enemy of the British people, and it is particularly sophisticated and ruthless in the way in which its agencies use social media to manipulate, mislead and control the people whose taxes make it all possible.
British governments are especially concerned over the potential of Islamist terror attacks to spark a violent reaction among the long-suffering majority population. So it is no surprise that it has emerged that the British state has prepared for terrorist incidents by pre-planning social media campaigns which are designed to appear to be a spontaneous public response to attacks.
Hashtags are carefully tested before attacks happen, Instagram images selected, and “impromptu” street posters are designed in advance, ready to be printed at a moment’s notice.
In operations that contingency planners term “controlled spontaneity”, politicians’ statements, vigils and inter-faith events are planned in readiness for any terrorist attack.
 |
Within hours of an incident, I “heart” posters designed and distributed according to the location of the attack. Job lots of flowers are rushed to the scene of the crime, then handed to people to lay in apparently unprompted gestures of love and support.
The purpose of the operations is to shape public responses, encouraging individuals to focus on empathy for the victims and a sense of unity with strangers, rather than reacting with violence and anger.
The campaigns have been deployed during every UK terrorist incident in recent years, including the London Bridge attack in June 2017, the Finsbury Park mosque attack that took place two weeks later and the mass murder of innocent little girls in the town of Southport by African Axel Rudakubana last year.
In that event, government and legacy media efforts to present the killer as a Welshman only served to inflame public anger, which led to violent protests and clashes with the police in a number of places. Just because the Powers that Be try to manipulate people doesn’t mean that they will always succeed!
The attack on London Bridge involved three Islamist fanatics driving a hired van into pedestrians out strolling on one of London’s tourist landmarks. The attackers then jumped out and started attacking people with knives, killing eight people before they were shot by the police.
Early the next morning, a team of men arrived at the scene of the murders in an unmarked van. They were allowed through the police cordon, before plastering walls with posters bearing images of London and hashtags that were already circulating on Twitter, including #TurnToLove, #ForLondon and #LoveWillWin.
Such postering is a minor criminal offence, but police took no action. The men doing this work refused to tell journalists who they were, or where they were from.
The following day, a government official telephoned Southwark Council, the local authority for the area where the murders happened and announced that ‘we’re sending you a hundred imams.'" About 100 imams and Muslim community leaders were bussed from across the UK to condemn the attack.
The following weekend, a group of Muslims arrived at the bridge and handed out thousands of red roses. One of the organisers described it as “a symbolic gesture of love” for people affected by the attack. What she did not tell reporters is that she worked in law enforcement at the Home Office.
Some of these plans were drawn up in advance of the 2012 London Olympics, intended to “corral the Princess Dianaesque grief” that was expected to emerge after any mass-casualty attack - a reference to the public mourning that followed the death of the royal in a car crash in 1997. Those measures were described candidly as an attempt at “mind control”.
“The [British] government doesn’t want spontaneity: it wants controlled spontaneity,” one of those involved in the planning has since admitted.
After British and American aid workers were beheaded by Islamic State militants in 2014, Breakthrough Media, a London-based communications company employed by the government, produced an image of a woman wearing a Union Jack hijab. This was slapped on the front page of The Sun, the country’s biggest working-class newspaper, and presented as a spontaneous Muslim response to the brutal killings.
 |
The Union Jack hijab was one of hundreds of media projects that Breakthrough designed for Prevent, the UK’s counter-radicalisation programme.
When an ISIS-inspired suicide bomber killed 22 innocent concert-goers at Manchester Arena in 2017, the mind-control experts ensured that the huge public rally was diverted from righteous wrath to saccharine impotence with a sea of flowers and night-lights and Manchester rock band Oasis singing “Don’t Look Back in Anger”.
Given the fact that the attacker and his accomplice brother had been weaponized against Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi by the British intelligence service MI6, and then allowed back into the country by the government, anger would in fact have been an entirely appropriate emotion. Anger, that is, against the government, against the ruling elite that created this shambles.
What Is To Be Done?
This brings me to the most important point: As I have explained repeatedly in recent months in various interviews and podcasts, very powerful forces are pushing Britain towards Civil War.
We know from the above at least some of how the British state will try to handle it on the PR side. The question for us is: How will genuine and intelligent British nationalists react? What will WE do? What will YOU do?
I have been working on this and have a set of very serious, constructive proposal for you. It’s a key part of my return to front-line political organisation, and you and many others will see it here first.
So, please, restack this, subscribe, and get in touch if you’re willing to help!
Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
