Political Correctness Is Cultural Marxism

Political Correctness Is Cultural Marxism

By Brannon Howse

Many of those who follow One-World Spirituality and pagan spirituality are committed to the economic policies of socialism, and the economic system that is based not only on the re-distribution of wealth but on the confiscation of private property as well. The author of the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx called for a powerful central government, a punitive progressive income tax system, the merging of education with industrial production, the elimination of a free press, and much more. Sadly, Marxism is alive and well in America, but this destructive worldview has been hidden from most Americans under terms that mask the reality of what is going on. 

When you hear "political correctness," what comes to mind?  Informed, discerning, and insightful individuals immediately think of such PC words as tolerance, diversity, multiculturalism, and feminism. But what do these words really mean?

Tolerance means that one person never expresses a judgment about someone else's ideas, beliefs, and values from a worldview of absolute truth. Tolerance demands that you not only accept the other worldview but that you value their worldview-unless, of course, their worldview is Biblical Christianity. Tolerance is very intolerant of Bible-minded Christians.

Diversity or sensitivity training is about the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle.

Multiculturalism is not the study of many cultures but the criticism of the Western Culture and its founding worldview of Christianity. Multiculturalism also desires to destroy patriotism.

Feminism is not about equal rights for women but about the destruction of a patriarchal society in favor of a matriarchal society. In other words, the goal of feminism is the destruction of the family by eliminating the husband and father as the provider, protector, and principled leader of his home. Think of fathers like Charles Ingalls from Little House on the Prairie, John Walton from The Waltons, and Ward Cleaver from Leave It to Beaver. Each of these television programs presented the father in an accurate portrayal of what American society at one time expected and loved about the patriarch of the family. A father who did not shape and encourage his children to embrace and live out a Christian worldview through their characters and life choices was looked down upon by society as being a dead-beat, a drunkard, an immoral reprobate, or slothful.

Today, society no longer has these high expectations or the shunning of men who are not principled and present fathers. Look at today's television programs where the father is often not even in the picture, and, if he is, he is not a principled leader of his home who seeks to disciple his children in truth and right living. Often the father is the whipping boy of the program, the stooge that the children treat with extreme disrespect.

Feminism has accomplished its ultimate goal-the destruction of the American family through the destruction of the father and, thus, the rise of the welfare state.

Political correctness is all about creating chaos by destroying the American family, replacing the role of the father with the role of the state, normalizing sexual perversion, and ridiculing traditional morals and virtues that stem from Christianity.

The PC crowd uses this chaos to justify more government. Political correctness is really a masking term for cultural Marxism. An all-powerful and intrusive government that robs you of your freedoms is the ultimate goal of what you may know only as political correctness.

People laugh about political correctness as if it is some kind of joke, but losing your freedom of religion, freedom of speech, property rights, and parental authority is no laughing matter. Thought control is not funny, and many Christians have been prosecuted under state hate-crime laws for sharing the gospel and for publicly speaking out against homosexuality. If you doubt me, then you should order Worldview Weekend's DVD, "The Criminalization of Christianity," which documents many such cases. It is available from our online bookstore at www.worldviewweekend.com

Marxists have used the term political correctness for at least 80 years to hide the worldview of cultural Marxism. In 1923, a group of German intellectuals started what has become known as the Frankfurt School. The writings of the Frankfurt School faculty and their disciples are abundant, and their goal could be summed up as the eradication of Christianity from the culture.

By eradicating Christianity not only would the family fall and the church become impotent, but capitalism and the free enterprise system that was birthed out of the Protestant Reformation would be destroyed.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power in Germany, many members of the Frankfurt School conveniently found refuge in America at the invitation of Secular Humanist John Dewey, who was on staff at Columbia University in New York. Dewey is best known as the father of modern education in America, honorary president of the National Education Association, and co-author of the Humanist Manifesto I.

Dewey saw the opportunity to place these German Marxists at leading colleges and universities around the country. Dewey and his friends specifically targeted the institutions of education and media as the means by which to inculcate their worldview into millions of Americans and eventually into American culture.

Dewey had help from Edward R. Murrow in spreading these German Marxists around the nation. In 1934, at the age of 26, Murrow became the Assistant Secretary of the Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced German Scholars. A few years earlier, in 1932, Murrow had become the Assistant Director of the Institute of International Education, which was established through a grant from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Murrow was hired by Stephen Duggan, the director of IIE who advised the Soviet government on issues related to their workers' colleges. Duggan was a crusader for the Communist agenda.

Murrow also joined the American Russian Institute, which had been founded with the help of John Dewey. The Institute sponsored lectures from individuals such as Anna Louise Strong, a well-known journalist who wrote books defending the Soviet system.

Murrow eventually went to work for CBS, where he became the famed newscaster. Murrow is perhaps best known for using his broadcasts to destroy U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, who was investigating the infiltration of Communists into education, media, and Hollywood. McCarthy had personality quirks that made him an easy target for marginalization, yet many experts now admit that McCarthy was correct in his view that Communists had infiltrated American education and the media. Of course, Murrow knew this to be true because he assisted in bringing many of these Marxists to America and dropping them into influential positions. To the discerning and informed American it becomes clear why Murrow was out to destroy McCarthy before he could uncover the anti-American agenda of Dewey, Murrow, and their friends.

One of the men whom Murrow brought to America from the Frankfurt School was Herbert Marcuse. The phrase "make love, not war" that was shouted during the counter-culture revolution of the 1960s was coined by Marcuse. The student rebels of the 1960s implemented the strategies laid out by Marcuse in his writings. Marcuse was greatly influenced by the writings of Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.

The student leaders of the 1960s were encouraged by Marcuse's cultural revolution statements such as:

One can rightfully speak of a cultural revolution, since the protest is directed toward the whole cultural establishment; including the morality of existing society….there is one thing we can say with complete assurance. The traditional idea of revolution and the traditional strategy of revolution has ended. These ideas are old-fashioned…what we must undertake is a type of diffuse and dispersed disintegration of the system."

Many of the anti-American, flag burning, pot-smoking, pagan spiritualists of the counter cultural revolution are now college and university presidents, professors, and American textbook authors.

T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr. wrote in a research paper entitled "Political Correctness in Higher Education" that:

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the Politically Correct assault on the curriculum is that it has occurred at many of America's elite universities. Take, for example, the case of Stanford University, an institution that has long played a leadership role in American higher education. Stanford eliminated its long-standing Western civilization requirement in 1988 and replaced it with a multicultural program known as "Cultures, Ideas, and Values." Under this new program, freshman at Stanford can just as easily study Marxist revolutionaries in Central America as they can Plato, Shakespeare or Newton. Because elite institutions such as Stanford set an example for the rest of American higher education, other universities eagerly adopt these devastating assaults on the curriculum. This "trickle-down" effect will have a long-lasting impact on the way future generations of Americans will be educated. One distinguished scholar recently lamented that "higher education is increasingly about acquiring attitudes and opinions that one puts on like a uniform."  

The best way to combat political correctness is to expose it for what it really is-Cultural Marxism. Equally important in defeating this anti-Christian, anti-American worldview is to not comply with its mandates. Call homosexuality what it is-sin. Expose feminism for what it is-anti-family, anti-father. Expose tolerance as moral relativism and intolerance toward those who don't conform to their dictates of tolerance. Expose sensitivity training as an attempt to destroy freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Point out to your family and friends the consequences that cultural Marxism has had and is having on our faith, families, and freedoms.

Unless you desire to live in a country where the middle class has been destroyed and we are under the tyrannical thumb of a small group of cultural elitists who control every aspect of your life, then you had better speak up. Nothing is more powerful than the truth, and nothing scares the elitists more than their worldview and agenda being exposed for what it really seeks to accomplish. 

This article represents some of the information presented in Brannon's new DVD, Three Worldviews Seeking To Destroy Your Faith, Family and Freedoms. Click here to order now:

Brannon reveals five national consequences that come to a nation that continually rejects God. America is experiencing all five of these consequences now. Brannon also reveals how these five national consequences are being manifested through three worldview growing trends- Political Correctness, which is Cultural Marxism, pagan spirituality, and what Brannon calls One World Spirituality. 

ENGLAND IS FOR LIFE NOT JUST FOR FOOTBALL

By Horwich Nationalists 


FOR SALE FAUX ENGLISH PATRIOTISM FOOTBALL EURO 2012

Although this article may down not to well at first, I ask you to stand back a moment and ponder a little, before coming to a judgment on it. 

You see my gripe is with all the English flags decked out on houses and cars at the moment, As I see it most but not all of those who fly the flag at the moment are willing to stand by and let our once proud English nation be destroyed by the political correct Marxist elite! whilst showing a sort of patriotic spirit in support of a team of overpaid prima Donna's, over a third of whom are easily seen not to be English in heritage, in a football tournament which is no more than a money making venture for the multi national big business. 

Their is nothing sadder in my eyes, than when you see this mass selling of alcohol in order that the population may pickle it,s brains for a quick buck, whilst watching this staged spectacle of Faux money making Patriotism, And also at these Multi national superstores and garages were underpaid third worlders, who have cheated a English man or woman out employment and services hard selling the National Flag, I cannot repeat what I screamed at one who said to me "Inglishy Flag mister worldy cup" ,the word off! was mentioned and the question of his parentage as well! In effect it is no more than a Bread & games spectacle, so why not say stuff it! And bring on the Gladiators as the Roman Elites did!

So I say to you out there that are flying flags some which even have England written across them to remind them who,s flag it is. That England is a country a tradition a culture and heritage that millions have sacrificed every thing to protect, and that you must do the same if you wish it to continue,
ENGLAND WAS FOR LIFE , NOT JUST FOR FOOTBALL! 

Solidarity Welcomes Abolition of GTC But Dismisses Gove’s Comments as “Uninformed

Solidarity Welcomes Abolition of GTC But Dismisses Gove’s Comments as “Uninformed at Best and Lies at Worst”

Fri, 04/06/2010 - 14:12 |  BNP News

The Solidarity Trade Union has welcomed the planned abolition of the General Teacher’s Council (GTC) but has dismissed Education Secretary Michael Gove’s comments on the Adam Walker case as “uninformed at best or lies at worst.”

Mr Gove gave Mr Walker’s case as a reason why the GTC was no longer needed.

Mr Gove said that the decision to allow the BNP activist to remain on the teaching register after “describing immigrants as savage animals” on an internet forum was proof that the GTC has “has failed to protect us.”

Mr Gove has either read the details of the case, and chosen to deliberately lie, or he has not bothered to read the case at all.

“In reality, Mr Walker did not describe immigrants as savage animals,” said Pat Harrington, secretary general of Solidarity.

“The comment, posted on a local Teeside discussion forum, actually said that those immigrants who had been convicted of raping and murdering British people were savage animals.

“It is a complete distortion to say otherwise, as Mr Gove has done,” Mr Harrington said.

“The GTC ruling specifically pointed this out and that was why Mr Walker was not guilty of racial intolerance because the comments were directed at violent criminals who could be of any race.

“Furthermore, Mr Gove’s allegation that the comments were made on what he called an extremist website are laughable,” Mr Harrington continued.

“The forum, called Teeside Online, was a non-political general discussion forum for local people. Its topics included sport, local issues and events.

“Only one thread — out of thousands — dealt with the reasons for the rise in popularity of the BNP in Teeside. It was on that thread that Mr Walker made his anonymous comment about criminals.

“It is thus clear that Mr Gove’s comments are uninformed at best or lies at worst,” he said.

“Nonetheless, we welcome the abolition of the GTC as it was set up to interfere in the private lives of teachers,” Mr Harrington continued.

“It busied itself with gross intrusion into such things as if teachers went to the pub and other silly things.

“It is, however, totally wrong to use the Adam Walker case with which to beat the GTC. Ironically, this was a case where the GTC actually did something right, not wrong.

“Solidarity defended Mr Walker precisely because it is the only union which believes that a member’s political views are his or her own business,” Mr Harrington concluded.

Find out more about Solidarity Trade Union by clicking here.

Publicly-Funded BBC Actively Discriminates against White People

Publicly-Funded BBC Actively Discriminates against White People

  From BNP Newsroom

The BBC has been revealed as pursuing an active anti-white recruitment policy and even takes photographs of potential employees so that their race can be recorded, it has been revealed.

According to a Freedom of Information request, as reported in a daily newspaper, nearly half of the places on the BBC journalism trainee scheme have gone to non-whites.

The total number of places available was 51, for which some 5,816 people had applied. Of the 51 selected, 24, or 47 percent, were non-white.

Even more shockingly, candidates who were turned down reported that their photographs were taken in an obvious measure to determine their race.

Candidates were also asked if they had “experience in writing stories that would appeal to people from different racial backgrounds.”

This put white candidates at an immediate and implicit disadvantage, as confirmed by several people interviewed in the press on the issue.

The percentage is way in excess of the current non-white proportion of the population, and is a breach of the Race Relations Act which demands “parity.”

Deliberately favouring one race over another for jobs is illegal in terms of the law, and the BBC’s criterion for selecting its trainee journalists has clearly breached the Act.

The trainee journalist scheme is a three year course which offers on-the-job training, tuition and assessment.

This is not the first time that the BBC has engaged in overt anti-white discriminatory practices.

Apart from the corporation’s unflagging support for immigration and the multicultural disaster, its former director general Greg Dyke famously described his staff as “hideously white.”

The plot to flood the BBC with non-whites is no coincidence and was deliberately planned, a fact revealed by Equality and Human Rights Commission head Trevor Phillips.

In a newspaper interview early in 2010, he said “One of my friends chaired the board for BBC trainees. Thousands apply.

“He went in and said, ‘I’m going to make sure this year it’s not all white boys from Oxbridge’.

“So they advertised in the right way, sifted the candidates in the right way and actually it worked.”

Another newspaper article quoted an unsuccessful white applicant to the scheme as confirming that the recruitment process was biased in favour of non-whites.

“One of the questions the assessors from the BBC asked was to do with what experience I had in developing stories that would be of interest to ethnic minorities,” the unnamed applicant was quoted as saying.

“I thought asking the same question to my ethnic minority would be very unfair as they will have a natural advantage, being from such a background, which then obviously would lead to a better answer, and overall interview.

“I was shocked later to learn — from a friendly Muslim girl who was also at the interview — that she was asked the question and freely admitted it was ‘easy to answer’ because of her community background,” he said.

“I did also think also think it strange that the BBC organisers took photos of all the candidates during the assessments.

“They said it was to “remember our faces” — but now I think it was possibly to confirm what race candidates were when considering who to take onto the scheme.”

Only in Labour and Tory Britain could a publicly-funded corporation actively discriminate against its own indigenous population.

British Medical Association Chief Warns That “Budget Cuts” Will Reduce NHS’s Operations

British Medical Association Chief Warns That “Budget Cuts” Will Reduce NHS’s Operations

From the BNP Newsroom

Despite ConDem promises to “ring fence” spending on the National Health Service, it is inevitable that budget cuts will force many health trusts to stop providing some services to the public.

This warning was sounded by the British Medical Association’s central consultants and specialists committee chair, Mark Porter, at a conference of medical academic representatives in London last week.

“Consultant leaders have warned that service cuts will be strongly resisted if they are not backed by enough evidence,” said a press release issued by the BMA.

“The London conference heard debates about how the NHS could adapt to maintain or improve the quality of patient care in spite of reduced funding in coming years.”

Dr Porter was quoted as saying that “pressure to achieve up to £20 billion of efficiency savings by 2014 meant NHS trusts in England were compiling lists of treatments to be decommissioned or reduced.

“It is clear to me that this cannot be achieved by a few efficiencies and by creative accounting, but it is an inevitable conclusion that we will have to stop doing some things that our patients value,” Dr Porter said.

“Already, NHS commissioners are drawing up lists of health interventions that must be decommissioned.

“These lists are clothed in the language of evidence, but they represent target reductions based on cost and volume, sometimes ignoring the potential benefit to individual patients.

“In the quest for wholesale reductions in budgets, lists of banned treatments are being compiled. This is wrong,” Dr Porter said in the BMA statement.

The conference agreed that any changes must follow the Central Consultants and Specialists Committee’s principles stating that any reconfiguration of services “must be evidence-based, clinically led in partnership with patients, safe, and likely to maintain or enhance standards of care.”

Dr Porter called on consultants to “go back to your hospitals and prepare to protect patient services.”

Procedures which have been targeted for cuts include hernias, joint replacements, ear and nose procedures, varicose veins and cataract surgery.

The NHS has been told to make savings of at least £600 million — while at the same time, the ConDem government has committed itself to increasing the foreign aid budget to £13 billion per year.

* Meanwhile, it has been announced that 4000 NHS jobs are to be cut in Scotland as a result of the budget squeeze.

The cuts will include more than 1500 nursing and midwifery posts and at least 68 doctors.

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA IN EIGHT EASY METHODS

 From our Southern Rose correspondent in Alabama USA an interesting article she has come across.

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA IN EIGHT EASY METHODS
 We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to
capacity by many of  America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and
illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the
United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time.  Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it,"

Lamm said: "First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country."  History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided.  Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

Third,  "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort.  The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity.  As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent success of our own  multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by  tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated  ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only  tolerance and pluralism to hold us together."  Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would  replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is  important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in  America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would  have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."
  
"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would  invest in
ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority.  I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided  loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress  differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly  engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together.  Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common Language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic g ames.  C ommon enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell."  "Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one.  In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of  'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having  the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws.  I would develop a mantra: That because immigration I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book "Mexifornia." His book is dangerous. It exposes the
plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."

There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every  attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today.  Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our  educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that  practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.'  American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to  date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of  George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It  dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this  great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path especially The American Dream.

If you care for and love our country as I do, take the time to pass this on just as I did for you. NOTHING is going to happen if you don't.

Global-Warming Scammers Credibility, Not Islands, Sink beneath the Waves

Global-Warming Scammers Credibility, Not Islands, Sink beneath the Waves

 From the BNP Newsroom

By Mercia -- New research has shown that the Pacific islands which the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) claimed would sink beneath the oceans as a result of “man-made” global warming are in fact rising and getting bigger.

According to detailed research undertaken by Professor Paul Kench of New Zealand's Auckland University, 80 percent of the islands in question have shown an increase in size or have remained unchanged in terms of area over the last 50 years.

Professor’s Kench’s conclusions are based upon a comparison of highly-detailed archived satellite images of dozens of the Pacific islands taken decades apart.

The research concludes that the IPCC's “gloomy prognosis” for these island groups is incorrect and that the “physical foundation for these countries will still be there in 100 years.”

The islands in question are the Mid and South Pacific nations that the oft-discredited UN body claimed would cease to exist by the mid twenty-first century, having succumbed to massive rises in sea-levels caused by the activities of industrialised nations.

The UN’s “expert” IPCC claim, just like its predictions in respect of rainfall in the Amazon basin, greater frequency of Katrina-size hurricanes, the inundation of the Netherlands, drought in Africa and disappearing Himalayan glaciers, has therefore been revealed to be yet another lie.

In the same way as the British government is dependent upon its Met Office for “findings” which justify its proposed plans for the imposition of unnecessary green taxes to fund its globalist green bank project, the UN is dependent upon the “findings” of its “independent” IPCC for the “research” which underpins its multi-trillion dollar project leading to what it describes as “global governance.”

Many claim that both the UN and British government's climate agencies are pursuing political-economic agendas, rather than scientific ones.

Observers suspect the publication of this report (which, unlike most IPCC data has been subjected to peer-review), will be not be welcomed by the supposedly independent review committee currently "evaluating" the demonstrably flawed original “findings” of the IPCC.

Indeed, the independence of the academic body providing the review-committee has itself been called into question because of its promotion of the IPCC's “man-made” global warming claims.

In addition, the financial dependence of its members upon funding from governments (including Britain’s) known to be supportive of the UN's globalist agenda has also called their objectivity into question.

It is widely anticipated that this “independent” review body will vindicate (some prefer the term "whitewash") the IPCC when it reports later this year.

However, the latest research from Professor Kench, as published in latest issue of New Scientist magazine, shows that it is not island-states that are rapidly disappearing from sight, but the credibility of the IPCC and all associated with it.

A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT of USA

DIRECT FROM OUR USA CORRESPONDENT THE ALBAMA ROSE!

 

 

Who would have thought, and yet many are thinking it. 

 

 

By Lou Pritchett,   Procter & Gamble

A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO 
 THE PRESIDENT* 
  
 THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE MOST CHILLING

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America's true living legends- an 
 acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world's highest 
 rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize 
 him as the foremost leader in change management... Lou changed the way 
 America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to 
 be known as "partnering." Pritchett rose from soap salesman to 
 Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and 
 Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.

 AN OPEN LETTER TO 
 PRESIDENT OBAMA

 Dear President Obama:

 You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike 
 any of the others, you truly scare me.

 You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.


 You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive 
 Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no 
 visible signs of support.

 You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth 
 growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

 You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

 You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus 
 don't understand it at its core.

 You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others.

 You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned 
 yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to 
 publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail..

 You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' 
 crowd and deliver this message abroad.

 You scare me because you want to change America to a European style 
 country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.

 You scare me because you want to replace our health care system 
 with a government controlled one.

 You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly 
 capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

 You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose 
 that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of 
 living in the world.

 You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics 
 against certain banks and corporations.

 You scare me because your own political party shrinks from 
 challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

 You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider 
 opposing points of view from intelligent people.

 You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both 
 omnipotent and omniscient.

 You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything 
 you do.

 You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the 
 Limbaugh's, Hannitys, O'Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, 
 conservative points of view.

 You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

 Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will 
 probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

 Lou Pritchett 
 * 
 * 
 This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it. 
 Big surprise! Since it hit the internet, however, it has had over 
 500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed 
 is that good men do nothing... It's happening right now.*

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp

illegal immigrant Croydon benefit fraudster's uses witch to beat system

Croydon benefit fraudster's white witch-hunt

Croydon’s biggest benefit fraudster tried enlisting the help of a white witch’s celestial fixers to save her being deported. Failed asylum seeker, Adesuwa Ojo-Osagie - also known as Queen Hanson - tried to get help from the spirit world after she scammed more than £100,000 out of the tax payer.
In her time of need she sought the help of white witch, Kevin Carlyon, from St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex, to perform a spell to help her and her family escape deportation She urged Mr Carlyon to use his magic powers to bring an end to her turmoil but was left out in the cold after he refused to call in incorporeal beings to aid her.
Mr Carlyon said: “If anything I'm on the side of the authorities and my wish would be that any person of this ilk should be deported, whatever hard luck story they choose to spin.”

Ojo-Osagie was jailed for eight months last year after a case brought by Croydon Council heard she had used false identities to get into the country, work illegally and dishonestly claim benefits.
In a letter to Mr Carlyon, Ojo-Osagie, said: “In 2009, six weeks after my fifth child was born I was put in prison. I came out of prison last November and all of our assets including money in my children’s accounts were confiscated.
“We have since been served with deportation papers and our situation is very critical as deportation is imminent.
“Please if you know about ‘The Mirror’ that one can look into to see past and future events, I will be very interested in it. We want to know what the future holds for us.”
It was discovered Ojo-Osagie had more than £120,000 in 26 bank accounts. In total, the amount received by Hanson from making false claims for benefits and fraudulent earnings from employment was £114,941.
The 42-year-old of Parchmore Road, Thornton Heath, also failed to declare she was married to a man who was working full-time for the Royal Mail.

Britain is full up - Cameron must act to stem the tide of immigration

With Labour at last accepting that immigration is an issue, the Coalition needs to move fast, says Benedict Brogan.

 

By Benedict Brogan

Benedict Brogan's blog | Benedict Brogan's Twitter

0 Comments

It is still just about possible to go through life without spotting how Britain is being changed by immigration – if you are a hermit, or live on one of the more remote of the Hebridean islands, or are insulated from the realities of everyday life by money or power.

If you are a politician, of course, you can choose not to see. Gordon Brown presided, both as chancellor and prime minister, over a record influx of migrants, but was indifferent to the consequences. Isolated in a world bounded by Downing Street, his official Jaguar and his ethnically homogenous Scottish village above the Forth, his was never the experience of most citizens, in particular those in the capital.

 

Related Articles

• It's the Tories' inconvenient truth ? taxes will have to rise

• Gordon Brown's purge will leave us with MPs fit only for a call-centre

• Gordon Brown, what are you waiting for?

• Labour's betrayal of the poor is an open goal for David Cameron

• The Tories? programme of policy piracy could still run aground

• The holiday reading that could decide who runs Britain

When Gillian Duffy tried to raise the issue with him during the campaign, his instinctive response was to dismiss her as a bigot. No matter that six months before, he had found it politically expedient to identify himself with such concerns. "I have never agreed with the lazy elitism that dismisses immigration as an issue, or portrays anyone who has concerns about immigration as a racist," he assured us, before doing just that to Mrs Duffy. "Immigration is … a question about what it means to be British."
In fact, immigration ranks as one of Labour's greatest, most durable failures. Worse than that, it was a wilful failure – as secret documents revealed earlier this year, Labour opened the floodgate for social as well as economic reasons, in an attempt to change the culture of the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity".
The consequences, in terms of social tensions and pressures on local services, can be seen almost everywhere. During the election campaign, immigration was consistently the most important issue for voters, after the economy. Yet Mr Brown was oblivious to it. He was the dealer who got us hooked on cheap foreign labour, and its artificial highs of unsustainable growth and low inflation. Ministers learned not to ask awkward questions. With no reliable statistics on who was coming in, who was here, and who was going out, "I don't know" become a legitimate excuse.
Tony Blair set the orthodoxy by proclaiming that we were not a "high-immigration country", and his followers duly repeated it. David Blunkett, who could normally be relied on to speak plainly on behalf of those who knew things were changing but could not say why, pronounced that there was "no obvious upper limit" on immigration.
And until the economic crisis hit, he was right. The numbers say it all. Net immigration jumped in a decade from about 41,000 a year to 233,000 in 2007. It fell to 163,000 in 2008, but only because more people left the country. The number of people entering Britain that year actually rose, from 574,000 to 590,000. Even now, they keep on coming, drawn to a country that offers more opportunities (and even greater welfare support) than just about anywhere else.
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics, released last week, show that long-term immigration is down, but still running at 503,000 a year. Even more telling, the number of people applying for British citizenship in 2009 was 24 per cent higher than the previous year, at 193,810. And the number who were granted it was up by 58 per cent, from 129,375 to 203,790.
Jill Matheson, the National Statistician, predicts that within less than 20 years, the population will rise from 61 million to 70 million. Nearly three quarters of that increase will be made up of immigrants. Already one in 10 of those living in Britain was born abroad. These are all whacking great numbers, which tell us that if one strips out the momentary effects of the downturn, immigration continues to outpace our capacity to cope.
Mr Brown talked of "lazy elitism", and that is precisely what he and his colleagues suffered from until the voters disabused them. Immigration was a closed subject, to be used solely as a political weapon against the Conservatives. Labour would look for ways to raise the issue as bait, in the hope that the Tories might bite, and be damned as racists.
Yet now power has been lost, and the old views can be disowned, the party has started talking about national identity and the impact of migrants with the bug-eyed enthusiasm of an iPad bore. For those fighting to lead Labour, the topic has gone from taboo to mandatory. The four Identikit candidates likely to be on the ballot when nominations close – the Miliband brothers, Ed Balls and Andy Burnham – all admit that they did not pay enough attention to what they were being told on the doorstep, namely that we are full up. Amid the soul-searching on the Left, there is an acknowledgment that Mr Brown's general refusal to acknowledge such concerns contributed to defeat. David Goodhart, the editor of Prospect, has even called on Labour to become the anti-immigration party.
This was, perhaps, a rhetorical flourish, but it shows the danger for David Cameron and the Coalition. Though the Labour contest has ages to run, there are plenty involved, especially the frontrunner, David Miliband, who have spotted an opportunity to outflank the Coalition from the Right. Scrapping ID cards and DNA testing, he argues, plays well with the chattering classes, but badly with ordinary voters, who believe only criminals and illegal immigrants have anything to fear from such intrusive measures.
Mr Cameron has to produce an answer, and fast. The focus during his first weeks has been on the improbability of coalition-building and the imperative of reducing the deficit. Events are already closing in. Downing Street navigated the implosion of David Laws with a combination of ruthlessness and calm assurance, and has emerged remarkably unscathed, if one is prepared to ignore the manifold contradictions upon which the Coalition is built.
The Government now needs to show that it understands the imperative to stem the numbers of migrants pouring in to Britain. Without action on immigration, the necessary work of slashing welfare spending, and therefore the deficit (and eventually the debt), cannot truly be said to be under way.
In private, ministers say that immigration is "on the front burner". Damian Green, the Immigration Minister, was due to make a preliminary announcement on the idea of an annual limit on the numbers coming in from outside the EU today, although the massacre in Cumbria has forced a postponement. We are, I am told, weeks away from an announcement on how the cap will be implemented, although I gather ministers have yet to address the delicate question of the precise number. Ominously, concerns have been raised about the ease with which pro-immigration groups can use the courts to stymie politicians who want to act.
In his everyday life before May 6, Mr Cameron was never one to cut himself off from the world around him. He can see the changes immigration has produced, not least in London, where the impact is most keenly felt. The danger for him now is an encircling move from Labour that exploits the Coalition's silence on an issue that still burns bright in the public mind – and rightly so.

The real world of money

The real world of money

Author: rugfish

Well, the media are creeping out of the woodwork preparing us for the fall I see by making headlines out of the Bilderberg Group which previously only nutters, idiots, conspiracy theorists and people like me and you knew about but were never believed.
I mean it's not like the British National Party leader has been talking about a Marxist plot to take over the world or anything, heaven forbid the media would actually report that!
But at least they are mentioning it.
Okay, maybe I should for once give the BBC a bit of credit for covering at least part of the Bilderberg story in 2004, which I got a link HERE and placed on my blog 2 weeks ago HERE.
BBC also attending Bilderberg, to perpetuate the lie.
Fair's fair so they say so I can only presume that the reporter responsible is still working.
But I'm pleased to see the Daily Telegraph reporting the problems of maintaining a dud currency - the Euro, and I also noticed Speigel online yesterday which mentioned its demise in a report that blamed politicians (Merkel and Sarkozy), for doing more to save their political skins than to actually save the economy.
The Times however hits half a nail on its head with its headline: 'Secretive Bilderberg Club ready for protests'. Note: This is the same paper which released Mandelson's book story yesterday, who just happens to be attending the Bilderberg Group in case you missed it.
But! It might be all a bit fruitless and pointless other than for the secret puppeteers to have 3 days leisure facilities of course, because after all is said and done, us people are already caught on to them and with the current economic system there is actually NO WAY OUT OF THE MESS WE'RE IN except to cancel debt.
Cancel debt?
What debt?
Oh, it's THEIR DEBT. Yes don't worry, you don't owe a thing and neither does our government because it's all imaginary money with imaginary secret backers who have suddenly all agreed to enlighten us of their existence I imagine because they are preparing to be compensated.
You see, me being a true cynic which takes a lifetime to learn, I understand their moves before they make them because I look around and listen and watch what others do.
People like Daniel Estulin for example who is shortly about to release his new book Shadow Masters which is the culmination of his 13 years worth of investigations into the Bilderberg Group which he describes as a 'limited company', of the 'aristocracy of the progressives', which he says holds more wealth than nations and acts purely in its (their), own interests, which is funnily enough what we think too and tried to tell papers like the Times all about it but were always written off as 'theorists'.
Maybe if they play their cards right, Mr Griffin could tell them what we all know about Marxism too and how together with capitalist swine who think they can create a real new world order if only we keep believing that those who own all the paper they created are actually 'rich' and intelligent enough to get 'us' out of 'the mess THEY are in', whilst wondering how to convince the rest of us that the paper they created is actually worth something so we'll continue to let them remain in 'control' of the very countries we once called ours.
It's the same trick a magician or conjurer does when he brings a rabbit out of his hat and part of the audience will swear blind it is magic but most of us know he got it from under the table.
That's the real world of money.
It never existed in the first place and only by hypnosis can you be made to believe that it ever did.
Okay, I don't believe in magic and I don't believe in fairies although I can see Peter Mandelson is real.
So now it's over to The Bilderberg Group and its media pawns to convince me that I can be hypnotised against my will which I also know is impossible. Or, to take one of a couple of measures: 1) Sit back and let the governments of the world pretend that the economic system is collapsing, 2) Pump more fake money in to make Bilderbergers dreams come true, 3) Cancel debt and start again, or 4) Resign from office and hand it over to people who always knew that money never grew on trees.
I don't have much hope they'll do any of them so if anyone is visiting the Dolce hotel in Spain over the next few days could they put their ear to the window and tell the rest of us what went on?

Mandelson States the Obvious about Labour

Mandelson States the Obvious about Labour

Author: rugfish |  

NuLabour is dead but what of Britain:
It was hardly surprising after the battering Labour received at the last election to hear that Peter Mandelson had scuttled off to Nat Rothchild's Swiss chalet retreat. As we know, being under media spotlight when all around you are either crowing over your defeat, wringing their hands in anguish, or pointing the finger of blame to anyone but themselves, is not really Mandelson's cup of tea. Mandelson prefers to play the hero and take the role of star performer not some organ monkey rolled out to give awkward responses to unanswerable questions such as who was to blame.
Just as his own position as an unelected government minister was declared dead on 6th May 2010, it seems pretty damned obvious to me at least, that Mandelson, having quaffed enough champagne and eaten enough quails eggs over these last few weeks at one of the Rothchild's residences, would soon become sick of driving Nat's Ferrari round the alpine trail and would be tapping the British media pedal again in the form of Francis Elliot at The Times, for him to help manufacture some free advertising space for this summer's release' of Mandelson's 'NuLabour novel' in the guise of memoirs.
I mean what else does one do after all when one considers ones position as a washed up unelected political mouthpiece without a mail service or steel manufacturer to ruin, other than to sit and write your memoirs and 'help' your former colleagues by threatening to write nasty things about them which would "ruffle a few feathers", and how does one do it in the most devastating way to gain as much publicity as possible other than by declaring 'NuLabour is dead'?
Laying on the tears on TV to promote your book has already been done by Alistair Campbell so that wouldn't work for Mandelson. Anyway, to see him blubbing on telly would be even less convincing than it was to see the media Hawk of Westminster. No. Mandelson would have to think up something else, so he came up with "NuLabour is dead".
No tears, no arguments. Mandelson has spoken so that's an end to it. I'll say no more until you get my book. And now it's over to me me me, or rather him, him him, to tell you what comes next for the Brand New, all singing and dancing, "aspirational", "reformist", and completely "serious"....PROGRESSIVE LABOUR PARTY , which is or wants to be, "about Labour not being a party of class or sectional interest, but about being a broad-based party of conscience and reform".
I don't think Mandelson 'get's it' yet.
All that Socialist champagne must have gone to his head a bit I think when he says; “It will no doubt ruffle some feathers but if it didn’t it wouldn’t tell the story of what new Labour achieved in government, where and why it didn’t achieve everything we hoped for, and what it can accomplish in the future.”
Surely he missed the bits about invading Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanistan, giving away our sovereign rights to unelected foreigners like himself, smashing what was left of our legal system, bankrupting the country whilst selling off its gold reserves in return for worthless bits of paper, and basically declaring an intention to eradicate the indigenous people of these islands because they have the misfortune of being 'white' and not wanting to vote Labour.
Surely he also missed the bit about electoral fraud, a rush to popularise his party in the eyes of gay, black and other ethnic minorities by declaring them above the majority, and he missed to mention the underhand, undemocratic, deceitful and tenuously legal although completely illegitimate practice of giving taxpayers money to Common Purpose, the Unions, and to every gay, black and Islamic face in Britain whilst declaring the rest of us a bunch of bigoted racists.
Surely Mandelson won't be writing any of that in his memoirs!
So where is Progressive Labour heading?
Perhaps Labour will start a new party which makes truth and democracy their first aim but I doubt it. Even old Labour didn't do that otherwise it would not have sold out the working man and worked to transform Britain into the cesspit it has become with people like Mandelson at the helm.
Incidentally, I won't be buying Mandelson's book because I know there's nothing in it I wish to read, but no doubt there will still be enough Mandelson mugs about to keep him in draw liners and cosy nightgowns whilst he gets back to his mates Swiss retreat to work out when (not if) he should declare the Labour Party has progressed so much these days that it has decided to come out and openly declare its formal attachment with the new unelected coalition.
I wait for Mandelson to declare that henceforth LibDems, NuLabour and the Tories will be known as the LibLabCon Con Party. The only Party to ever govern Britain because people like them all think the same. i.e. None of them offer an alternative, present any opposition, give any democratic value, add anything in terms of what YOU might want for YOUR country, because 'they' don't believe in any of that sort of stuff because they are the ONLY party you will ever need and you will ever have chance to vote into power, because they will continue to see that ballot papers reflect the opinions 'they' want you to have because your true opinions are horrible racist and bigoted, because they disagree with Mandelson, Cameron and Clegg in their joint progressive venture which is to gain as much for themselves as possible whilst milking Britain until it has nothing left to give except a reason for them to write 'its' memoirs in the form of 'history books' which show only what they accomplished and nothing of how or why they wrecked and spoiled our country which went downhill and slid into the New World Order whilst people were too busy being enthralled by TV soaps and fast-credit to notice that their country had been turned into a shit hole by the 'Labour Party' and Peter Mandelson.
read more at the The Green Arrow

A Guided Tour of the BNP’s Belfast Membership, Call and Distribution Centre

A Guided Tour of the BNP’s Belfast Membership, Call and Distribution Centre

  BNP News

The astonishing growth of the British National Party and its professionalisation is nowhere better illustrated than the membership, call and distribution centre in Belfast.

BNPtv has produced a special guided tour of the centre, hosted by membership secretary Jennifer Matthys.

This video illustrates the giant leap forwards in administration which the BNP has made over the last two years, mainly due to the extraordinary generosity of BNP supporters and donors combined with the incisive businesses practices introduced by the Midas Consultancy under Jim Dowson.

Watch this dramatic video on BNPtv by clicking here.

Labour/Tory-Backed “Points Based” Immigration System Fails to Halt Immigration Invasion

Labour/Tory-Backed “Points Based” Immigration System Fails to Halt Immigration Invasion Which Jumps to 1.2 Million in Three Years

Fron BNP Newsroom

The Labour Party-developed and Conservative Party-endorsed “points based system” (PBS) immigration scheme has done nothing to halt the immigration invasion of Britain and an astonishing 1.2 million “new” immigrants have entered our country in the past three years.

The new figures were released after research from think thank Migrationwatch.

Although Migrationwatch blamed the Labour Party for the policy in its press release, the reality is that the Conservative Party endorsed the policy, only saying that they wanted to add a “cap” to the system as well.

“Analysis now reveals that economic migration in 2009 was up by about 20 percent compared to 2007, the year before the introduction of the PBS for non-EU workers,” Migrationwatch said in its press release.

“This took place despite the deepest recession for a generation having led to unemployment of 2.5 million.

“The number of students, also part of the PBS, increased by 30 percent in 2009 compared to 2008 before the system applied to students,” the Migrationwatch statement continued before going on, incorrectly, to exclusively blame Labour for the invasion.

According to the figures, there were 159,535 permits granted in 2007. This figure jumped to 188,545 in 2008 and then increased again to 190,640 in 2009, or an increase of 20 percent.

It also means that over the three year period from 2007 to 2009, the number of work permits issued totalled 538,720.

This figure does not include “students” who entered Britain under the broken immigration system.

According to the Migrationwatch figures, the number of “students” who entered Britain in 2007 came to 223,545.

This figure jumped to 208,800 in 2008, and 273,445 in 2009, an increase of 30 percent.

This means that over the three year period in question, an astonishing 705,790 “students” were granted entrance into Britain.

This figure is larger than the total number of all students in full-time study in Britain. Official figures released in mid 2008 showed that the number of full-time students gaining places at UK universities stood at 413,430.

It is therefore impossible that these 705,790 “students” are all bona fide.

Even more disturbingly, when the total number of “student visas” is added to the total number of permits issued (538,720 + 705,790), it can be seen that an astonishing 1,244,510 people were granted permission to enter Britain legally from 2007 to 2009.

Make no mistake, this is an invasion — and the Conservative Party is just as much to blame as Labour or the Lib Dems.