European Court of Human Rights Opens Floodgates for Thousands More Bogus Asylum Invaders

European Court of Human Rights Opens Door for Thousands More Bogus Asylum Invaders

  The British National Party Newsroom

The European Court of Human Rights has opened the door for thousands of bogus “asylum seekers” to invade Britain and other European nations after abolishing the right of European Union member states to deport illegals back to Greece.

This week’s court ruling means that any asylum seeker can be guaranteed to remain in Britain (or any other EU nation) just by claiming to have entered Europe through Greece.

The ruling was the first to be heard by the court under the European Union mechanism known as Dublin II, which allows EU member states to deport bogus asylum seekers back to the nation through which they first entered the continent.

The case arose after Belgian deported an Afghan asylum seeker to Greece under the Dublin II rules, which say that an asylum seeker must have their application heard in the EU member state they entered first.

The court found Belgium and Greece had violated articles 3 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which deal with the prohibition of “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” and the “right to an effective remedy.”

According to the court, Greece violated the convention because of “detention conditions and deficiencies in its asylum procedure.”

It was ruled that Belgium had violated the Human Rights laws by “exposing the plaintiff” to the Greek system.

The court also found that Belgium had “violated the convention by denying the applicant an effective remedy against his expulsion order” – in other words, that Belgium had not given the bogus asylum seeker a way of appealing against his deportation to Greece.

The ruling means that the Dublin II rules can be overturned by an asylum seeker merely saying that he or she entered Europe through Greece.

The very nature of the illegality of most asylum seekers’ entry into Europe (and Britain in particular) makes it of course almost impossible to disprove a claim that Greece was an individual’s first port of entry.

At least half a million asylum seekers are thought to be living in Greece without any legal status, which has placed an unbearable strain on the Greek state’s infrastructure.

Earlier, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has said that the Greek asylum system had “collapsed” under the tidal wave of invaders.

Germany has already officially stopped sending asylum invaders back to Greece and all other EU states will soon follow suit. There are a reported 7,000 such cases throughout the EU, with at least 1,300 in Britain.

Ironically, Britain’s open doors policy has meant that the Dublin II rules have not even been enforced here, so the ruling will only affect asylum invaders in the sense that it will provide an added layer of legal protection against any attempts to get them out of the country.

As Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green said, “This opens a gateway into Europe and Britain for asylum seekers.

“Future asylum seekers will enter the EU through Greece safe in the knowledge we cannot send them back. Their cases will have to be settled here at the expense of the British taxpayer.”

UK Police’s Undercover Operations Help Organise Anti-British National Party Communists

Exclusive: Police’s Undercover Operations Help Organise Anti-British National Party Communists

  The British National Party Newsroom

The police’s undercover operations unit is actively involved in supporting extremist far leftist and communist UAF public violence against the British National Party, sensational new photographs have revealed.

 Mark Kennedy (highlighted) at a UAF demonstration against the British National Party, Derbyshire.The photographs, which show now-exposed undercover National Public Order Intelligence Unit police constable Mark Kennedy taking part in a UAF protest against the British National Party in Derbyshire during 2009, have been released by party spokesman Simon Darby.

In the photographs, taken by a British National Party activist at a UAF demonstration outside a licensing application for the 2009 Red, White and Blue event, Pc Kennedy is clearly visible.

Wearing dark clothes and carrying a green rucksack, Pc Kennedy, who was known by the nickname ‘flash’ amongst his far leftist colleagues because he often funded activists’ transportation to demonstrations and their accommodation, can be seen in the crowd of UAF protestors.

The UAF is headed up by Wayman Bennett, an executive member of the extremist communist ‘Socialist Workers’ Party.’

According to earlier revelations about Pc Kennedy, he often took the lead in organising events and a recent court case against environmentalist activists collapsed when it was revealed that the policeman was behind the attempt to occupy a power station.

It is however Pc Kennedy’s involvement in the UAF and its activities against the British National Party which have now taken centre stage following the publication of the new pictures.

“Bear in mind that no less than 19 UAF demonstrators were arrested for public violence outside the British National Party’s Red, White and Blue event in 2009,” Mr Darby said.

“In the light of Pc Kennedy’s involvement in the UAF demonstration, the party and the public have the right to know how much of this violence and subsequent cost to the taxpayer was actually coordinated by the police in the first place,” he said.

“In an interview with a newspaper, Pc Kennedy boasted that intelligence he had gathered had been passed directly to Tony Blair,” Mr Darby said.

“In addition, Pc Kennedy revealed that his salary was £50,000 per year, and that his handlers paid £200,000 a year into a secret bank account to help him maintain his cover.

“This means that over the eight years he was active, Pc Kennedy cost the taxpayer £400,000 in wages, and £1,600,000 in ‘expenses,’ or a total bill of £2 million.

“And part of his job was to help organise public violence against the British National Party which could then be used as propaganda against us by the media,” he continued.

“This is nothing less than state-sponsored subversion of a legitimate political party and must be a criminal offence,” Mr Darby said.

Nearly 200 UAF thugs have been arrested for acts of public violence outside British National Party events since 2008, including Martin Smith, National Secretary of the Socialist Workers Party, who was found guilty of assault on a police officer.

“How many of these incidents of public violence were not facilitated with taxpayers’ money supplied by the National Public Order Intelligence Unit?” Mr Darby asked.

* The National Public Order Intelligence Unit is run by the Association of Chief Police Officers.

* Another police officer recently exposed as having been involved in far leftist anarchist activities which would have included participation in ‘Searchlight Wales’ activities was Mark Jacobs, 44, who became a member of an anarchist group in Cardiff.

UK Taxes: Pay Up, Britons, You Have Bankers, the EU, Foreign Aid and the Immigration Swindle to Pay For

Tax: Pay Up, Britons, You Have Bankers, the EU, Foreign Aid and the Immigration Swindle to Finance

  The British National Party Newsroom

Already hard-pressed British taxpayers faces some of the largest direct and indirect tax rises in recent history, as petrol prices reach record highs and many families set to pay in extra tax of at least £2,800 extra each year.

The tax increases are supposed to be necessary to “balance the government’s deficit” but in reality the ConDem regime has increased expenditure on foreign aid and the war in Afghanistan. European Union membership has also seen of the sharpest rises in a number of years, while the ongoing cost of the immigration and asylum swindle, estimated by MigrationwatchUK to be of the order of £13 billion per year, continues full steam ahead.

British taxpayers will be made to pay for all this madness with changes to income tax, child benefits, tax credits and VAT increases.

According to a study paper released by the Resolution Foundation think tank, a couple with two children and a household income of £42,000 will lose £2,800 in accumulated taxes, a situation which the Foundation predicted will cause a “prolonged personal recession.”

The study also confirmed that it will be the middle classes who will suffer the most, with at least 700,000 middle-income earners being pushed in to the top tax rate as a result of changes announced by ConDem Chancellor George Osborne.

This will effectively double the tax burden for those people, a move which will completely undo Mr Osborne’s lifting of the tax threshold (the income level at which people start paying tax) to £10,000.

In addition, the changes to the tax structure will cause those middle income families to lose all child benefits as they become part of the top tax bracket.

The report went on to say that “The typical working household is now poorer in real terms than it was a year ago.

“In 2011, it will get poorer still. Even as growth resumes and the nadir of the financial crisis fades into memory, millions of families are living through a prolonged, personal recession.”

In addition, National Insurance contributions will rise in April.

As if that was not enough, all taxpayers are being hit by the increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) which, according to the report, will add at least £400 to the annual bills of the average family.

The projected increase in government revenue from this tax hike, which will amount to £13 billion, is a figure which just covers the foreign aid budget.

Motorists will also have felt the impact of the record increase in the cost of tank of petrol, with a rise of £3 within a 30 day period.

According to the Automobile Association, the monthly fuel bill for an average two-car family had increased by £34 in just a year.

“A 0.76p a litre increase in fuel duty on January 1 and VAT rising to 20 per cent, adding around 2.5p more to the pump price, accounted for the lion’s share of the latest increase,” the AA said.

AA president Edmund King was quoted as saying: “The huge fall in petrol sales shows that many drivers cannot afford to fill up. Sooner or later, politicians will have to face reality – more and more drivers cannot afford these prices.”

Immigrant “Fake Car Crash” Gangs Cause Motor Insurance Premiums to Jump by 30%

Immigrant “Fake Car Crash” Gangs Cause Motor Insurance Premiums to Jump by 30%

The British National Party Newsroom

Motor car insurance premiums have jumped by an average of 30 percent a year after a massive upsurge in fraud and faked car crash claims which have been blamed by police and insurance crime investigators on Pakistani, Afghan and Bangladeshi immigrants.

The increase in insurance premiums is yet another financial punishment inflicted upon the British public as a result of the massive Third World immigration invasion supported by both Tory and Labour governments.

According to the Automobile Association (AA), car insurance policies have increased by an average of £215 per year. Drivers will now be forced to pay an average of £845 for their annual policy, up 34 percent from last year’s average of £630.

According to Simon Douglas, director of AA Insurance, as quoted in a recent media report, almost half of the average insurance policy now goes to cover the cost of whiplash claims, fraud, legal fees and tax.

The number of whiplash claims has risen by 25 per cent in six years and £44 from every motorist’s policy goes to cover fraudulent staged accidents.

According to the media, these “crash for cash” claims are so common in certain areas that drivers in some parts of the country either cannot buy insurance at all or have to pay massively inflated premiums.

These areas are often located in wealthier areas where victims are most likely to have full comprehensive insurance.

For example, one company, Esure, reported a 300 percent increase in personal injury claims in the B31 postcode in Birmingham. Towns in this postcode include Longbridge and Northfield, some of the better-off areas of the West Midlands.

Parliament’s Transport Select Committee was told last week by Chief Supt Geraint Anwyl of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ roads policing section that the frauds were “highly organised and clearly very profitable.

“Induced collisions and staged collisions were taking place along with fictitious collisions,” Supt, Anwyl told the committee, adding that this was directly raising premiums.

According to the Insurance Fraud Bureau, there were about 30,000 “staged car crashes” last year which cost insurers about £350 million and added £44 to the premium of every driver.

In September 2009, London police inspector Nick Chalmers told BBC Asian Radio that “Pakistani, Afghan and Bangladeshi criminal gangs in Britain are staging deliberate car accidents in order to claim their victims’ car insurance money.”

Inspector Chalmers said that the gangs operate primarily in Yorkshire, Lancashire and the suburbs of London.

“The modus operandi of the gangs appears to be to move closely in a convoy of two cars. The first car suddenly brakes very hard, as does the second, forcing the targeted victim’s car to crash into the rear of the second car,” he said.

“The perpetrators then make a fraudulent car crash claim to their victim’s insurance company for damages to their vehicle and for personal injuries, such as whiplash, real or not,” he continued.

“Some fraudsters have claimed for injuries to persons not even present in the vehicle.

“Ten such gangs operate in northwest London alone, and the daily count of staged accidents could be up to 20,” Insp. Chalmers said.

An article in the Financial Times from 2008 dealing with the topic quoted the Insurance Fraud Bureau’s (IFB) head, Sue Jones, as saying that the proceeds from the ‘crash for cash’ cases were’ linked to other serious crimes and countries associated with Islamic extremism, such as Afghanistan.’

Ms Jones was quoted as saying that the IFB was specifically targeting these gangs, many of which were linked with "all sorts of other criminality.

“This is not just a crime where greedy people are lining their own pockets and driving around in flash cars and buying nice houses. It's the more sinister uses to which the money is being put,” she said.

Ms Jones added that “the crime was linked to drugs, immigration frauds and other financial offences, perhaps even including the financing of Muslim extremist groups.

"Of concern to us is the volume of money that's going out of the country through places like Dubai and into places like Pakistan and Afghanistan. Once the money is out there, it does become particularly difficult to get a handle on it,” she said.

agrre with the above article then why not join the British National Party here https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

UK Racial Nightmare: Whites Refused Access to Nursery Groups While Bangladeshi Girls Forced into Marriage

Racial Nightmare Britain: Whites Refused Access to Nursery Groups While Bangladeshi Girls Forced into Arranged Marriages

The British National Party Newsroom

White kids turned away from a state-funded playgroup because of their race, and dozens of Bangladeshi schoolgirls forced into mixed marriages to facilitate further immigration: this is the racial nightmare into which decades of Tory and Labour mass immigration has plunged Britain.

The two pieces of shocking news from different parts of the country illustrate precisely how bad things have become and also underline the importance of the British National Party’s struggle to prevent our nation turning into another Third World failed state.

According to media reports, two white kids were refused entry to the “Making Links” council funded playgroup in St Noets, Cambridgeshire, purely because of their race.

The playgroup, set up by the “Open Door” Christian Church, receives £11,000, which includes £1,000 from the St Neots Town Council and £5,000 from “Faiths in Action” which is in turn funded by the qungo Community Development Foundation, which gets its money from the Department for Communities and Local Government.

According to the Open Church’s website page on the “Making Links” playgroup” (which has been hastily removed but which is still viewable on the Google cache system) the aims of the group are “in the spirit of the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) document, “The Reception and Integration of New Migrant Communities” (2007).”

The website continued: “The weekly sessions are free and include refreshments, a 1½ hour art and craft session which varies each week, visits from free local service providers such as community police, children’s health services, EAL providers, etc, and a crèche within the meeting room provided by Sure Start.

The website went on to state that the aims of the project included the development of “cross-cultural friendships,” and the promotion of “cultural identity and self-esteem.”

However, this promotion of “cross cultural friendships” policy does not apply to white British kids, as two local mothers found out to their cost.

According to the news report, mothers Emma Knightley and Kimberley Wildman decided that the playgroup would be the ideal place for their youngsters to make new friends.

They were however turned away at the door because they were white. The media article reported that Miss Knightley said: ‘The first thing I was asked about was my nationality and when I said I was British I was told we had to leave.

“She said ‘Are you not aware this is for foreign people only?’ I said I knew it was trying to integrate people into the community but didn’t realise that meant British people and their children were banned.

“I felt humiliated. You wouldn’t get away with a British-only mum and children’s group.”

Meanwhile, from Tower Hamlets comes the news that Bangladeshi children as young as 14 are regularly being spirited back to Bangladesh to engage in forced marriages which then allow for further “family-based immigration.”

A government report named Tower Hamlets, which is now almost completely colonised by Muslims, as having the highest numbers of forced marriages in Britain.

The Department for Children, Schools and Families said that 2,000 children had gone missing from schools in 14 areas where there were high levels of forced marriages, including the East End.

 The position cannot be any clearer: White British people are being actively discriminated against and bizarre Third World practices are becoming increasingly common.

This is the inevitable result of the Third World colonisation of Britain, against which only the British National Party stands.

Agree with the above why not join the  the British National Party in Bolton and Horwich here https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

A Stranger in My Own Land Once Called London

A Stranger in My Own Land

 January 2011 by screamingmad. 

From STANDPOINTMAG Also published in Telegraph Hat tip to tyburntree. Thanks mate.
The Mole
Mole Special: A Stranger in My Own Land
ANONYMOUS
January/February 2011
I have just returned to London, where I have lived since I was 11. I have been away for four years, living as an ethnic minority in a monocultural part of the world, amassing a host of stories to tell to disbelieving friends. On the whole, I am glad to return. I shan’t miss some locals’ assumptions that, being a white woman, if I was outside after dark, as I occasionally was, usually to walk the few metres between my house and the church, I must be a prostitute eager to give them a blow job. I shan’t miss the abuse my priest husband received: the daubing of “Dirty white dogs” in red paint on the church door, the barrage of stones thrown at him by children shouting “Satan”. He was called a “f***ing white bastard” more than once, though, notably, never when in a cassock. I will also not miss the way our garden acted as the local rubbish dump, with items ranging from duvets and TV sets, to rats (dead or twitching) glued to cardboard strips, a popular local method of vermin control to stem the large numbers of them which scuttled between the rubbish piled in gardens and on pavements. Yes, I am very glad to have left Britain’s second city.

Brum Deal: Everyday life in Britain’s second city (Photograph by Julian Anderson)
For four years, we lived in inner-city Birmingham, in what has been a police no-go area for 20 years. We know that because some plain-clothed cops told us when they asked to use our vicarage as a stake-out to bust drugs rings that pervade the area. Having heard a parishioner’s tales of what his neighbours did to him when he was wrongfully suspected of having grassed up a cock-fighting ring, we refused, explaining that we had to live here, they didn’t. Even during this time we saw the area change. When we arrived, the population was predominantly Pakistani. Now Somalis are there in equal number. Most of the run-down Irish pubs were turned into mosques during our time.
As a woman, it was difficult for me to gain many first-hand impressions of the Muslims. I was generally ignored by both men and women, and on the rare occasion that I had to interact, when for example a car was parked illegally and blocking my gate, I was addressed as if inconsequential. My husband, however, faithfully reported conversations which you may find somewhat alarming. One of our favourite dinner-party pieces is this: opposite our vicarage there is a “library” which has some computers, some burkas and occasionally tracts that say offensive things about Jews and Christians. My husband did his photo-copying there, and got on rather well with everybody. One day he was chatting to a man with a passing resemblance to Lawrence of Arabia, who had just arrived from Antwerp — one of an increasing number of Muslims who are arriving here with EU passports. He asked him why he had come to Birmingham. He was surprised at the question: “Everybody know. Birmingham — best place in Europe to be pure Muslim.” Well, there must be many places in Europe where Muslims are entirely free to practise their faith, but I suspect there are few places in which they can have so little contact with the civic and legal structure of a Western state if they choose. It seems to be particularly easy to “disappear” if that is their intention. A parishioner once described a lorry pulling up outside his house, the side opening to reveal stacked mattresses full of sleepy, and presumably illegal, immigrants, who staggered out into broad Brummie daylight. We heard tales of how houses are exchanged for cash payments in our area. An untaxed car was once clamped by a frightened-looking official at 8am, but within hours the owner of the vehicle had organised the clamps to be sawn off, and he sped away.
Another instance of separation from the Western world is revealed in the following: my husband frequently chatted to a neighbour who could be described as one of the more questioning Muslims, and who has often provided an insight into the locals’ mindset. Even this man, however, believes what the whole community thinks: the 9/11 planes were organised by Jews. Everybody knows there were no Jewish people in the World Trade Centre that day, as they had been tipped off. Oh, and the Mumbai terrorists had been kidnapped and brainwashed by Indian people. The tendency towards denial is strong. When my husband mentioned the “dirty white dogs” graffiti to a local Muslim, the response was, “One of your people did it.” I have to say that the police’s response was no better when the local Methodists complained about the same thing. They chose not to believe it had happened, since we had removed all sign of it with the buckets of anti-graffiti chemicals we had stocked since we arrived. They asked, somewhat pathetically: “Are you sure it was racist?”
To a London reader, born and bred with multiculturalism, I know that my stories may come across as outlandish and exaggerated, and that I must surely be a BNP voter — I have observed people’s expressions as they have listened to my tales of life in Brum. When I recently told a friend how a large Taliban flag fluttered gaily on a house near St Andrew’s football stadium for some months, her cry of “Can’t you tell the police?” made me reflect how far many of our inner cities have been abandoned by our key workers: our doctors and nurses drive in from afar, the police, as mentioned before, have shut down their stations and never venture in unless in extremis — they and ambulance crews have been known to be attacked — even the local Imam lives in a leafier area.
Only the priest remains, if you can get one — the thriving but clerically-vacant church down the road has had no applicant in two years. In their absence, we get stabbings that never make the news, dog- and cock-fighting rings, cars torched as pranks and cars used for peddling heroin. (One of the more amusing moments of our time came when a local lad provided one reason people often gave us stares when we drove past such deals: “Two white people wearing seatbelts — you’ve got to be cops.”) In their absence, we simply have the witness of those who are unlikely to be heard, who, through a variety of unfortunate circumstances, have not been able to move out: the elderly, the infirm, the illiterate, the chronically poor. Indeed, some of the Muslim residents deeply regret the flight of the non-Muslim population. It is they who now have to live in a crime-ridden ghetto.
On holiday in Germany recently, we watched a TV documentary about how schools were coping with Essen’s growing Muslim community, and how the community itself felt. When it was over, we turned to each other, and said simultaneously (a drawback of having been married for a while), “This could not have been made in Britain.” At the moment, also in Germany, the whole country is debating Thilo Sarrazin’s controversial book Deutschland schafft sich ab (“Germany abolishes itself”), in which the author — a former member of the board of the Bundesbank and the German Social Democrats — examines research about immigrant communities and then makes specific recommendations about the integration of the Muslim community. I have only seen scant reference to this in the British press, which usually dismisses it, wrongly and lazily in my view, as good old German racism. This has nothing whatsoever to do with race. The Muslim community in Birmingham, for instance, is made up of people from many continents and races, including Afghans, Yemenis, Pakistanis, Indians and Somalis.
There is no doubt in my mind that we need to have the same openness in discussing what is happening to many cities in Britain. If current demographic trends continue over the next few decades, the West Midlands, as well as other parts of the country, will become a predominantly Muslim area. Much more needs to be done to integrate the communities among whom I lived, and we need to be much less negligent of our own values too. Frankly, if we happened to walk down Broad Street on a Friday night, where mobs of identically undressed and mostly aesthetically unpleasing gals and lads were on the piss and pull, it was almost a relief to drive back to our ghetto enclave.
It is time to rub the rime from our eyes and to look clearly at the shape of Britain today. Everyone living here needs to be able to talk about what they see, without the lazy or fearful, but certainly paralysing, accusation of racism. Only then will we be able to discern what is best for the future.

Help Nick Griffin MEP and the BNP to beat the PC EHCR Style Gestapos

Help Nick Griffin MEP and the BNP to beat the PC Gestapo

Written by Nick Griffin MEP BNP. Fellow Patriot Now it’s elderly Christians who are in the firing line of the ‘equality’ bullies! As you know, Trevor Phillips and his ‘Equality and Human Rights Commission’ (EHRC) persecuted the British National Party during 2010 – before finally losing the court case that they bought against myself, Simon Darby and Tanya Lumby. Now these bullies have turned their sights on bed and breakfast homeowners in another assault on our traditional rights by the Politically Correct Gestapo. Have you heard of the story of Peter and Hazelmary Bull? They are devout Christians who, for 25 years, worked hard to make ends meet by offering a bed and breakfast in their home. The Bulls were sued by the EHRC over their married-only policy on double beds and were ordered to pay a militant homosexual couple £1,800 each in compensation for the "hurt and embarrassment [they] suffered" at being told that they would be required to sleep in separate beds while staying at the Bull’s house. Thanks to your support and steadfast loyalty, Phillips and EHCR couldn’t break our British National Party. So now they’ve decided to pick on a smaller, more vulnerable ‘enemy’. So they took this couple to court for simply endorsing Christian principles. Isn’t it outrageous? So much for “an Englishman’s home is his castle!” Do you share my belief that it’s time to stand up to the PC bullies on behalf of our people? Equality is not always equal! I was, as I know you were, disgusted when I heard the judgment against the Bulls. We are living in dangerous times when, as Christians, we are persecuted in our own land. "Much is said about 'equality and diversity', but it seems some people are more equal than others."Hotel owner Hazelmary Bull. We must take a stand against this madness. I've talked to so many ordinary people about this case and I agree with every one of them when they tell me that things must change. I tell them that the only party which is prepared to speak out on controversial issues such as these is the British National Party. Only the British National Party will stand up and defend the rights of Christians to choose to live according to our nation’s traditional bedrock values. It's just one reason why the Political Class hate us, and why so many ‘ordinary’ decent folk wish us well.  If we can’t fight, they will win... It's the ‘ordinary’ people who fund and support the British National Party. Growing numbers of people, just like you, donate to this party because they want us to keep speaking out against the PC madness of today. People like you donate because they care. They, like you, are sickened by the way people are set up and persecuted by the PC Gestapo. We’re working on exciting plans to take the fight to the enemies of freedom. I want us to speak out loud and clear on issues like this, so I need your help. Please help me and the British National Party to keep fighting. Could your donation stretch to £500 to help us fight persecution and give the PC bullies another bloody nose? If not please consider making a gift of £100, £50 or £25. Please send your most generous gift today and keep the British National Party in this struggle. Thank you, Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party P.S. I can’t put a total on the amount that we need to raise this year in our continuing struggle against the Politically Correct elite, because the more we have, the more we can do. You can be certain that every pound counts, and with your willing help, we can win. You can dontate to the British National Party on their website here. You can join the British National Party on their website here. Want to speak to the British National Party then ring 0844 8094581

Recent attacks on Christians strongly condemned by European Parliament

Recent attacks on Christians strongly condemned by Parliament

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 
"It's nice to be on the winning side after a debate and vote in the European Parliament," Nick said this morning.

 He had just voted in support of a motion condemning attacks on Christian communities in Egypt, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, Cyprus, Iran and Iraq.
The MEP also said that the growing violence was leading to an exodus of Christians from these countries which was a form of 'ethnic' cleansing of this religious minority.
A press release issued by the European Parliament at lunchtime said:
"Religion should not be abused by perpetrators of terrorist acts in different areas of the world, say MEPs. They denounce "the instrumentalisation of religion in various political conflicts".
Break up of Christmas mass in the northern part of Cyprus
The forcible interruption by the Turkish authorities of the Christmas Mass celebrated on Christmas Day (right) by the remaining 300 Christians in the northern part of Cyprus is also condemned in the resolution.
Freedom of religion and belief: an integral part of relations with third countries
MEPs ask the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs to make sure that freedom of religion or belief and the situation of religious communities, including Christians, remain high on the agenda in relations with third countries. They stress this should be reflected in agreements and human rights reports.
In addition, they ask the forthcoming External Affairs Council of 31 January 2011 to discuss the persecution of Christians and respect for religious freedom or belief as well as the instruments that could be used to provide security and protection for Christians under threat around the world.
Among these instruments, MEPs call for a strategy to enforce the human right to freedom of religion, including a list of measures against states who knowingly fail to protect religious denominations.

UK ConDem Govt National Forest Sell-off Begins to Bite

Raiders of the Lost Bark: ConDem Forest Sell-off Begins to Bite

  The British National Party Newsroom

The ConDem regime’s plan to sell off huge areas of our national forests to private concerns for potential commercial exploitation has started to bite with the first reported “lock-out” occurring in Cumbria.

A British National Party supporter and forest lover reported that Rigg Wood, a beautiful oak wood on gently sloping land at the very edge of Coniston Lake in Cumbria, was sold off for £120,000 in terms of a plan announced by Tory “environment” minister Caroline Spelman last year.

“As you drive along the single track road, the Lake on your left, woodland on your right, the first place you can stop is Rigg Wood,” said the party supporter.

“There's just a pull-in for about twenty cars, where people park to unload canoes or wander along the lake shore or walk up the hill. Last week I went to pull in as usual and found a strong fence and padlocked gates.”

The padlocked gates (illustrated alongside) are the first tangible sign of what is happening under the ConDem regime’s “plan” to reduce the budget deficit by hacking away at the environment budget.

The very first ConDem move in this regard was to slash the environment budget by 30 percent (while, of course, increasing foreign aid to the Third World, partly to protect the environment there).

The next step was an announcement in October last year by Ms Spelman that at least 150,000 hectares of forest and other land owned by the state in England was to be sold off within the following three years in order to raise funds.

The total amount which the Government hopes to pocket out of this sale is estimated to be “only” £250 million, a mere fraction of the £12.1 billion foreign aid spend or the £4 billion Afghanistan war cost, or even the billions spent each year on membership of the European Union.

Paul Hetherington, spokesman for the Woodland Trust, was quoted in a newspaper report at the time of the announcement as saying that the sale would “raise a tiny amount but could do immeasurable damage and cost the nation dearly.”

Ironically, this is not the first time a Tory government has tried to sell off Britain’s forests. Both the Thatcher and Major governments tried to privatise the Forestry Commission, but fortunately these attempts were defeated following a public outcry.

Even more remarkably, the forests actually turn a profit for the government, further confounding the ConDem logic in wanting to sell it off.

Official figures show that in England, the forestry commission costs the government some £30 million each year, but generates £63 million each year in income.

The plan to sell off our forests to private speculators, who might then conceivably gain commercial usage “rights” over that land, amounts to the destruction of our traditional rights.

The locking out of the public is furthermore a breach of the Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act of 2000, which ensures the public can walk freely on mapped areas.

None of this has stopped the ConDem regime in their destruction of this country and its peoples’ rights.

* Readers who are concerned about this destruction of our forest and its heritage are encouraged to sign the online petition against the sell-off of our heritage here.

The Christian hotelier found guilty of gay bias looks set to lose her home and asks: So who's really being persecuted? | Mail Online

The Christian hotelier found guilty of gay bias looks set to lose her home and asks: So who's really being persecuted?

By Helen Weathers

In despair: Hazelmary Bull faces financial ruin after being sued for not allowing a gay couple to share a double room

Christian hotel owner Hazelmary Bull has certainly had her faith tested to the limit this week.

Yesterday, she was planning to make a four-hour round trip to visit her desperately ill husband Peter, 71, in hospital, where he is recovering from a triple heart bypass and valve replacement surgery.

How, she fretted, was she going to tell him that they were teetering on the brink of financial ruin? That there was little hope now of hangi
ng on to the Cornish guesthouse they’d owned for 25 years; the home they’d poured not only their life savings into, but also their heart and souls. In the end, 66-year-old Hazelmary just couldn’t bring herself to do it.

On Tuesday, Peter was undergoing a nine-hour operation at the exact moment his wife of 47 years was sitting in Bristol County Court waiting to hear their fate.

In a landmark ruling, which will have far-reaching implications for many Christians in Britain, Judge Rutherford ordered the Bulls to pay civil partners Martyn Hall, 46, and Steven Preddy, 38, £1,800 each in compensation for refusing to allow the couple to stay in a double room at their hotel.

The gay couple, IT workers from Bristol, sued the Bulls for £5,000 in damages under the Equality Act (Sexuality Orientation) Regulations 2007, after they were turned away from seven-bedroom Chymorvah House, near Penzance, in September 2008.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1349489/The-Christian-hotelier-guilty-gay-bias-looks-set-lose-home-asks-So-whos-really-persecuted.html#ixzz1BkXEct7P

Vlaams Belang Flemish MEP Tells BNPtv a Familiar Story Belgium & Britain - Totalitarian States

“We Were Convicted for Our Opinions” – Vlaams Belang MEP Tells BNPtv a Familiar Story

  

The Flemish nationalist party Vlaams Belang is persecuted in exactly the same way that the British establishment attempts to destroy the British National Party, one of its Members of the European Parliament Philip Claeys has said.

  Philip Claeys

Speaking in a video interview with BNPtv, Mr Claeys told of how the Vlaams Blok – the predecessor to his current party, Vlaams Belang – was banned by the Belgian courts for simply holding different opinions to those of the state.

“They changed the law explicitly in order to convict us. They changed the law several times,” Mr Claeys told Nick Griffin and Simon Darby.

“It was a scandal, because we didn’t actually do anything that was against the law. We were convicted for our opinions.”

After the Vlaams Blok (Flemish Block) was outlawed in 2004, its members formed the Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) in the same year. The new party became the single largest party in elections held six months after those events, has two seats in the European Parliament and has representation at all levels of Belgian government.

However, persecution of the Vlaams Belang continues today. Party members are not allowed to join trade unions in Belgium, which, under that country’s laws, also means they cannot receive unemployment benefit, Mr Claeys revealed.

The political system in Belgium is currently beset with problems due to its forced cohabitation of two distinct peoples, the Flemings and the Walloons.

“Belgium is two countries within one country. It is an artificial country. It doesn’t work anymore,” said Mr Claeys.

“If you want to know the future of the European Union, you have to look at Belgium now.”

Watch the video interview from BNPtv below:

European Parliament Briefing Paper: Christians under attack

Briefing Paper: Christians under attack

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 
In the European Parliament in Strasbourg there will be a debate on the recent attacks on Christians in Nigeria, Egypt and Iraq. Tomorrow there will be a vote on the issue.


 This is a briefing paper provided by European Parliament researcher Patrick Harrington, who is also a key figure in the independent nationalist trade union Solidarity.
"Following the latest at tacks against Christian communities in several countries, the EPP Group has taken the initiative of asking the EU and the High Representative Ashton to plan urgent and concrete measures to defend Christian communities and freedom of religion worldwide. Statistics tell us that last year 75% of religiously-motivated violence in the world was against Christians.
There have been several attacks against Christians during the Winter period, particularly in Nigeria, Iraq and Egypt."
Notes:
Two people were killed and at least 16 wounded in a series of bomb attacks on the homes of minority Christians in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, on Dec. 30.
Over Christmas, six people were killed in attacks on two Christian churches in northeastern Nigeria and six were wounded by a bomb in a Roman Catholic Church on the island of Jolo in the Philippines.
A New Year bombing outside a church in the Egyptian city of Alexandria killed 23 people and wounded dozens, and prompted demonstrations by both Christians and Muslims.
The Vatican has expressed  fears that the attacks, combined with severe restrictions on Christians in countries such as Saudi Arabia, are fuelling a Christian exodus from the Middle East.
Jerzy Buzek, President of the European Parliament, had this to say on the issue:
"It is clear that there are some fundamentalist elements seeking to create sectarian division within the Iraqi society where Christianity has been an integral part of the fabric of Middle-Eastern society for two millennia. We monitor the situation closely, I will continue to highlight the issue, at every possible opportunity, of the situation of Christians in Iraq and the broader Middle East region,"
My opinion:
You should take a strong stance against all attacks on Christians.
The situation in several countries is little short  of an undeclared war on them.
I think the profile of this issue needs to be highlighted by articles and interviews to show the leaders of the Christian communities in these countries and in Europe that there are MEPs who are concerned at the persecution taking place.

Left-wing bias? It's written through the BBC's very DNA, says Peter Sissons | Mail Online

Left-wing bias? It's written through the BBC's very DNA, says Peter Sissons

For 20 years I was a front man at the BBC, anchoring news and current ­affairs programmes, so I reckon nobody is better placed than me to ­answer the question that nags at many of its viewers — is the BBC biased?
In my view, ‘bias’ is too blunt a word to describe the subtleties of the ­pervading culture. The better word is a ‘mindset’. At the core of the BBC, in its very DNA, is a way of thinking that is firmly of the Left.
By far the most popular and widely read newspapers at the BBC are The Guardian and The Independent. ­Producers refer to them routinely for the line to take on ­running stories, and for inspiration on which items to cover. In the later stages of my career, I lost count of the number of times I asked a producer for a brief on a story, only to be handed a copy of The Guardian and told ‘it’s all in there’.

Veterans: Peter Sissons with Six O'Clock News' colleagues Moira Stuart (left) and Anna Ford soon after he joined the BBC

If you want to read one of the few copies of the Daily Mail that find their way into the BBC newsroom, they are difficult to track down, and you would be advised not to make too much of a show of reading them. Wrap them in brown paper or a copy of The Guardian, would be my advice.

I am in no doubt that the majority of BBC staff vote for political parties of the Left. But it’s impossible to do ­anything but guess at the numbers whose beliefs are on the Right or even Centre-Right. This is because the one thing guaranteed to damage your career prospects at the BBC is letting it be known that you are at odds with the prevailing and deep-rooted BBC attitude towards Life, the Universe, and Everything.

At any given time there is a BBC line on everything of importance, a line usually adopted in the light of which way its senior echelons believe the political wind is ­blowing. This line is rarely spelled out explicitly, but percolates subtly throughout the organisation.

Whatever the United Nations is associated with is good — it is heresy to question any of its activities. The EU is also a good thing, but not quite as good as the UN. Soaking the rich is good, despite well-founded economic arguments that the more you tax, the less you get. And Government spending is a good thing, although most BBC ­people prefer to call it investment, in line with New Labour’s terminology.

All green and environmental groups are very good things. Al Gore is a saint. George Bush was a bad thing, and thick into the bargain. Obama was not just the Democratic Party’s candidate for the White House, he was the BBC’s. Blair was good, Brown bad, but the BBC has now lost interest in both.

Trade unions are mostly good things, especially when they are fighting BBC managers. Quangos are also mostly good, and the reports they produce are usually handled uncritically. The Royal Family is a bore. Islam must not be offended at any price, although ­Christians are fair game because they do nothing about it if they are offended.

Queen Elizabeth II was not a favourite at the BBC

The increasing ­tendency for the BBC to interview its own reporters on air exacerbates this mindset. Instead of ­concentrating on interviewing the leading players in a story or spreading the net wide for a range of views, these days the BBC frequently chooses to use the time getting the thoughts of its own correspondents. It is a format intended to help clarify the facts, but which often invites the expression of opinion. When that happens, instead of hearing both sides of a story, the audience at home gets what is, in effect, the BBC’s view presented as fact.

And, inside the organisation, you challenge that collective view at your peril. In today’s BBC only those whose antennae are fully attuned to the corporation’s cultural mindset — or keep quiet about their true feelings — are going to make progress.

Moreover, making progress these days doesn’t mean just achieving the influence and prestige of a senior job with the world’s greatest broadcaster, once considered reward enough. For those breaking through into the senior ranks, there’s now big, big money and a gold-plated pension to be had

Which is why, although there has been plenty of grumbling on the shop floor about the escalation of pay for top BBC managers in recent years, it’s muted. No one wants to wreck his or her chances of a well-paid place in the promised land. The newsroom has many talented journalists of middle rank, who know what’s wrong with the organisation, but who don’t rock the boat for fear of blowing their futures.

Not that talent alone is enough to get on at the BBC. The key to understanding its internal promotions system is that, for every person whose career is advanced on ability, two are promoted because it solves a problem for management.

If Human Resources — or Personnel, as it used to be known — advise that it’s time a woman or someone from an ethnic minority (or a combination of the two) was appointed to the job for which you, a white male, have applied, then that’s who gets it.

But whatever your talent, sex or ethnicity, there’s one sure-fire way at a BBC promotions board to ensure you don’t get the job, indeed to bring your career to a grinding halt. And that’s if, when asked which post-war politician you most admire, you reply: ‘Margaret Thatcher’.

What the BBC wants you, the public, to believe is that it has ‘independence’ woven into its fabric, running through its veins and concreted into its foundations.
The reality, I discovered, was that for the BBC, independence is not a banner it carries ­principally on behalf of the listener or viewer.

Rather, it is the name it gives to its ability to act at all times in its own best interests.
The BBC’s ability to position itself, to decide for itself on which side its bread is buttered, is what it calls its independence. It’s flexible, and acutely sensitive to which way the wind is blowing politically.

Complaints from viewers may invariably be met with the BBC’s stock response, ‘We don’t accept that, so get lost’. But complaints from ministers, though they may be rejected publicly, usually cause consternation — particularly if there is a licence fee settlement in the offing. And not just ministers, if a change of Government is thought likely.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair was a BBC favourite according to Sissons

Back in October 1995, the then leader of the Opposition, Tony Blair, made his big speech at the Labour Party Conference — but on the Six O’clock News, there was every chance it would be upstaged by the verdict in the sensational OJ Simpson trial in the U.S., which was expected at the same time. Even at the conference itself delegates crowded round TV sets for the news, and it wasn’t to see a rerun of Tony.

Alastair Campbell, Blair’s press secretary, was having none of it. He faxed the BBC and ITN ‘not to lose sight of the importance to the country of Mr Blair’s speech’. He wanted it to lead the news. ITN ignored his letter. The BBC made sure the Six O’clock News complied.

That spoke volumes. Such a letter from a spin doctor would have been binned on principle by the great editors of ITN who I worked for before joining the BBC. At the BBC, the instinct, faced with such a plea from a party of the Left standing on the brink of power, was to do as requested.

All Governments work hard on influencing the news agenda, but what I found uncomfortable during my years presenting the Nine O’clock and Ten O’clock News was how blatant those attempts to pressurise the BBC became, particularly at General Election time.

The party machines all had the internal BBC telephone numbers of the editors of the major news ­programmes, whom they would try to bully in person, both before and after the programmes went out.

I remember a night when the ­editor’s phone rang after the Nine O’Clock News. It was a direct call from No 10, questioning her judgment and complaining about our political coverage that night. This wasn’t a call to the director-general, or the head of news, but to a harassed and tired editor who had been on duty for 14 hours.

‘Tell him to get stuffed,’ I advised her. She rolled her eyes, knowing better than I the row that would be caused by that.
One of the things that always ­puzzled me at the BBC was the lack of inspirational leadership. There were exceptions.

My favourite ­editor when I chaired Question Time was notable for his total ­loyalty to me and the rest of his team. If things went wrong, he saw it as his job to take the bullet. That was not the BBC way — the old ­saying ‘Deputy heads must roll’ still raises a smile, but only because of the truth it contains.

Most of the managers I had over me had status and rank, on paper. In reality, they had little talent except the dark art of surviving at the BBC and alienating those who were answerable to them. I was always struck by how few senior people there were to look up to and to learn from.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349506/Left-wing-bias-Its-written-BBCs-DNA-says-Peter-Sissons.html#ixzz1BkVP91sk

eft-wing bias? It's written through the BBC's very DNA, says Peter Sissons | Mail Online: "

Free Speech, Oldham, Hypocrisy and Ukip's Paul Nuttall

Free Speech, Oldham, Hypocrisy and Paul Nuttall

The British National Party Newsroom

By Andrew Moffat--
Free speech is indivisible.  It does not submit to transient political vogue.  Either it is open to all or it does not exist.  It is not selective.

Andrew Moffat

Many members and supporters will be incensed at the treatment of Derek Adams, the British National Party’s candidate in the Oldham by-election. 

At a hustings meeting, Mr Adams was told to leave the hall.  His views – and those of his party – were deemed to fall beyond the Orwellian parameters of permissible discussion. 

The establishment parties and their pale shadow, Ukip, were not prepared to be challenged by Mr Adams on questions judged beyond the artificial boundaries of what may and may not be discussed.  Nor were the candidates prepared to subject themselves to controversial public debate and the right of the public to scrutinise them and their policies.

Complicit in this type of conduct, during the campaign, was Paul Nuttall, MEP and Ukip deputy leader. 

What action did he take to safeguard British free speech and condemn the disgraceful treatment of Mr Adams?  Worse, on the recent Sunday Politics Show, the interviewer stated that Nuttall had refused to engage in debate with Mr Adams, who had to be interviewed separately.

Inexplicably and paradoxically, Nuttall is prepared to debate with those who have treacherously surrendered Britain’s sovereignty to the EU.

Contempt for the Electorate

In June 2009, when elected MEP for the North West, Nuttall made a point of joining the ‘establishment’ parties in dismounting the stage at the announcement of Nick Griffin’s election. 

By his action – no doubt designed as a sycophantic bow to attract the approbation of the establishment – Nuttall displayed his disdain for the electors of his North West constituency.

Failed Objectives

Nuttall knows that Ukip is acknowledged as a safety valve by those who have no allegiance to the concept of the British nation state, both to divide the patriotic anti-EU vote but also to marginalise the British National Party.  Nigel Farage has frequently boasted that his party’s existence has thwarted the BNP.

On the recent Politics programme, Farage made his sole point:  “I want us to thrash the BNP in this constituency.”   Farage and Nuttall have not stinted their party in that respect:  various estimates to date place Ukip’s eye-watering expenditure at anything between £40,000 – £60,000 – a fortune, merely to ‘thrash’ a fellow anti-EU party, which spent approximately £4000.

The result, however, was a disaster for Ukip and an own goal:  Ukip failed to ‘thrash’ the BNP.  It exceeded the BNP’s vote by a paltry 469 votes, at a cost of between £20-£30 in terms of its total vote or £85-£127 in terms of the aforementioned 469 votes.

Nuttall also failed in his own stated objectives:  he did not secure third place and he failed to secure double digit figures.  How much of his money did he contribute to the campaign?

Safety Valve and High Powered Meeting at the BBC

The establishment campaign to back Ukip began in earnest at an important, high level meeting between it and the BBC, prior to the 2004 European Parliamentary elections.  

There, the two organisations agreed to the promotion of Ukip, with the explicit purpose of stifling and undermining the potential of the BNP. 

Readers will have observed the special relationship between the BBC and Ukip, whose current leader, Nigel Farage, has received more appearances on Question Time than any other politician since it began over 30 years ago. 

Similarly, readers will have observed the contrast in the treatment meted out to Nick Griffin by the BBC and its specially selected audience on the one hand and that accorded to Farage, whenever the latter appears on the programme.

The agreement between the two organisations – which has similarly received the approval of allied establishment agencies – is not without obligations.

Ukip is permitted to imply a tough line on immigration but the small print in Ukip’s policy ensures that this refers to EU immigration and there is no policy to deny or revoke citizenship to such elements, erroneously assuming a Ukip administration many decades hence.

As has often been reflected, what is the purpose of preserving the integrity of the nation state when, as a consequence of massive and uninterrupted immigration, there will be no nation within the state worthy of preservations within 50 years?

Indeed, at the present rate of demographic change, there is every risk that the UK, or regions within it, will become Islamic and subject to Sharia law.

Should that occur, the ideal of preserving our ancient rights and freedoms from the EU will become an historical pipe dream. 

The Ukip leadership knows this.  Either elements within it, who should know better, will not act because, contemptibly, they are gutless and spineless or, as is also the case, certain elements will not act because they are complicit with the political process and therefore treacherous to their own members’  and national interests.

Pastor Martin Niemoller

Nuttall and his sanctimonious colleagues cannot fail to appreciate that Ukip’s success – which falls well below that of the BNP in Westminster elections – depends upon the BNP’s fortunes. 

Without the BNP, Ukip and its members would find themselves under similar pressure to that currently experienced by the BNP.

Pastor Martin Niemoller’s statement is relevant:

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out because I was not a communist; then they came for the social democrats and I did not speak out because I was not a social democrat; then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist; then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew; then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Where were Messrs Farage and Nuttall when Trevor Philips and the Government attempted to close down the BNP and alter its policies and fundamental constitution?

Nuttall’s EU Attendance Record

Demonstrative of Nuttall’s performance is his attendance record at the European Parliament.  VoteWatch records Nuttall as the MEP with the poorest attendance record in the UK, bar his colleague, Godfrey Bloom.

Nuttall attempted to defend himself on Sunday’s Politics programme, stating that he voted only on laws affecting the UK.

A perusal of the EU Parliamentary website, however, will demonstrate that Plenary sessions do not allocate voting matter according to countries. 

The main exception is regional or emergency funding, which is only available because of the financial contribution of the UK and is therefore opposed by the BNP’s two MEPs.

Attendance records, moreover, are based upon daily attendance not upon individual votes.

The North West’s constituents sent Nuttall to the EU to vote on legislation, directly or indirectly affecting the UK.  Nuttall must therefore justify his salary and explain his absence.

He might also care to explain why there is no Ukip MEP on the most important Parliamentary Committee, i.e. that which determines constitutional affairs and overseas the transfer of the UK’s sovereignty. 

The only MEP to mind Britain’s interests is Andrew Brons, of the BNP, whose attendance record in Parliament is presently first equal amongst the UK contingent.

Gross Hypocrisy

In spite of Nuttall’s knee-jerk political-correctness in terms of his theatrical hostility to the BNP, his stance in the EU is entirely different.

The long-standing Junius website contains many pages relating to Paul Nuttall.  Amongst them is one which describes his colleagues in the EFD, the EU Parliamentary group, co-led by UKIP. 

As Junius observes, the forerunner of the EFD, prior to Nuttall’s election in 2009, was the Ind Dem Group.  Georgios Karatzaferis, was a member and vice-president of the group in the European Parliament (2004-2007). 

In 2000, Karatzaferis stated: "The New World Order means that we are a puppet at the hands of the Jews... The Global government has taken place in Europe. The common currency too! They are dancing it to their tune. Do you know what kind of money the Jews are profiteering with these ups and downs? We are being led to the fulfillment of targets set 200 years ago."

Junius goes on:  “In 2001, the rhetoric became more menacing: "The Jews have no right to provoke, because they have filled the world with crimes".  He also challenged the Israeli ambassador to come and debate "the Holocaust, the Auschwitz and Dachau myth". 

The US State Department, in its Annual Report on Religious Freedoms in 2005, singled out LAOS, and its leader (and then MEP) Giorgos Karatzaferis, for promoting “radical nationalism, anti-Semitism, racism, and xenophobia”.”

Junius continues:  “Adonis Georgiadis, a LAOS Member of the Greek Parliament, has attracted criticism for his literary activities. A writer and publisher, he has been accused of promoting a book, Jews: the whole truth, by Konstantinos Plevris, himself a former LAOS member, which describes Jews as "subhuman" (p.582).

Plevris is critical of the Nazi regime for "not ridding Europe of Jewish Zionism", and states that Jews should be "rounded-up and executed within 24 hours" (p.742). Plevris, who describes himself in his book as a "Nazi" (p.600) also claims that former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan is a "descendant of cannibals".”

Laos currently has two MEPs, attached to the EFD.

Elsewhere on the website is an account of the activities of some of the EFD’s MEPs, including overt and illegal racism, arson, ‘heiling’ Hitler and more.

Doubtless, this type of behaviour was instrumental in persuading Ukip MEPs Mike Nattrass and Nikki Sinclaire to leave the EFD.

The grave question therefore arises, why is it that Nuttall and his colleagues find themselves unable to resist repeated condemnation of the BNP, in order to parade their own politically-correct sycophancy, whilst simultaneously associating themselves with the EFD, some of whose members might cause the BNP to be imagined as a social democratic party?

Is this gross hypocrisy or is it, perhaps, to do with the additional funding EU Parliamentary groups receive, allied to the increased media exposure the EFD’s egoistic leader, Farage, receives?

* Andrew Moffat stood, twice, as a Parliamentary candidate for Ukip, achieving amongst its highest votes at the time.  He departed Ukip, inter alia, because of the leadership’s nonsensical hostility towards an anti-EU party and its determination to split the anti-EU vote.

Stalinist zeal of UK's Political Correct School Teachers

Stalinist zeal of PC teachers

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: A former Conservative councillor has written to Nick Griffin MEP with a worrying example of what is going on in our schools today.


 His letter tells of political correctness gone mad and of the Stalinist zeal of teachers and school bureaucrats in vilifying and humiliating youngsters who don't follow the PC code.
The gentleman wrote:
"I had hoped that the new government would right some of the wrongs caused by the last shambolic Labour government but have been sadly disappointed.
"I was appalled by the treatment your candidate received being frog-marched out of the hustings like a common criminal, when the police cannot even catch the real common criminals!
My grandson aged 14, has just been accused of xenophobia and racism because he told a joke about a Polish girl to a Polish boy in the school library and was overhead by the librarian.
He was frog-marched out of the school premises and suspended for two days.
The irony of this whole sorry affair is that I am an Honorary Captain in the former Polish Reserve Forces (Government in exile) and hold the Order of St. Stanislav.
So much for a family that is seen as anti- Polish?"
Responding on behalf of Nick Griffin MEP, Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Thank you for your correspondence regarding your grandson’s shocking experience with the self-appointed Politically Correct education police.
"Mr Griffin asked me to convey his sympathies to you and your family. He is well aware how truly alarming, upsetting - and indeed baffling - in can be to suffer the (over)reaction of the PC authorities when they perceive that an act of “racism” has been identified. In many of these cases, it certainly does appear that the world has gone completely mad!
"I understand that your contact details have been forwarded to a local British National Party representative (as requested), and I trust he will be able to assist you in bringing this matter to a sensible conclusion. A conclusion, one hopes, that does not result in a blemish on your grandson’s school record in the form of a documented “racist” incident, nor the diminution of his healthy sense of humour.
"The media, in collusion with Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem politicians, has portrayed anyone associated with nationalist politics, or simply opposition to excessive and  unrestricted immigration, as ignorant, dangerous or mad - and often all three - for many years. Thankfully, the British public are beginning to see through this media smokescreen, designed simply to impede the inevitable progress of the only Party in British politics that truly reflects the fundamental concerns of the majority population.
"132,094 voters in the 2009 European Elections, for example, placed their faith in the North West Region British National Party candidate, Nick Griffin, in spite of the intense and vicious anti-BNP campaign waged against the Party by an alliance of the media, trade unions, and mainstream political parties.  Advances in communications technology, such as the internet, have moreover, provided the British National Party with the opportunity to by-pass the Establishment media, which is committed to maintaining the status quo. Our independent websites, coupled with a national monthly newspaper and nationwide leaflet campaigns, have enabled us to take our message directly to the public, and to show them that British National Party supporters are ordinary citizens from a range of social backgrounds and occupational professions who recognise that contemporary politics appears to be devoid of any semblance of common sense.
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr Griffin if you require any assistance."