The Great Reset - a "Jewish Plot"?

A year old, but still very relevant

By Nick Griffin 

Follow Nick on Substack

Follow Nick on X

 

The idea of the ‘Great Reset’ has faded from the headlines, but the catastrophic damage done by the Covid Plandemic to the finances and health of entire nations means that the question of who was behind this global elite attack on the whole of humanity remains very relevant.

Many, among the ‘far-right’, ‘conspiracy theorists’ and anti-Zionists alike, saw the name ‘Klaus Schwab’ and immediately jumped to the conclusion that it was all a “Jewish plot”. Is this true or not? Blaming people who deserve to be blamed is not hate, only justice, but blaming people who are not to blame is both injustice and a recipe for failing to understand the real problem. So this is worth a deep dive.

I wrote the article below just under a year ago, using it in the UK as the script for the bulk of a video broadcast as one of my then weekly “Templar Reports” on Purged.tv

I am reproducing it here exactly as I first wrote it for two reasons: First, despite Schwab’s resignation in April this year, the article remains important and topical. It explores a little-noticed but very important aspect of the history of the World Economic Forum and thus the origins of both the ‘Great Reset’ and the transhumanist technocracy which produeced the idea on the back of the Covid plandemic.

Second, because the professional complainants of the pseudo-charity the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism seem to be basing their private prosecution against me on the claim that criticism of the Great Reset is based on the allegation that it was all a Jewish plot.

I have no recollection of whether I authored or published the meme and text which they claim so upset them. Over the years I published thousands of Twitter posts. By their very natuere they are ephemeral, posted today, perhaps discussed and retweeted for 24 hours and then lost forever amid the deluge of social media noise.

My X account having been hiacked and wiped back in early June 2024, months before I heard of their complaints to the police, I am unable to check, or to defend myself by producing definitely genuine posts which would refute the picture they paint.

The first hearing in the case against me is due in Westminster Magistrates’ Court early next month. No doubt the CAA will repeat their crowing about this and try to bring it to the attention of the media. If the press cover the story, you can be sure that they will publicise the claim or implication that I believe that the Great Reset is/was a “Jewish plot”.

The Board and their ‘charity’ want such headlines, because they shamelessly use them to frighten and gouge donations out of ordinary, decent members of the Jewish community. It’s a sort of protection racket, and they need the threat of ‘monsters’ and “bigots” to make it work.

The liberal elite media, meanwhile, need crackpot antisemites and other loons to demonise genuine and legitimate opponents of the various schemes of the global elite for whome they are propaganda mouthpieces. If they can put the defenders of freedom and human dignity in boxes marked “Dangerous Extremist”, and “Antisemite”, they destroy our credibility, thus providing cover for the creeping global coup d’etat of an elite which - if based on any ‘religion’ - is founded on the worship of Mammon. As I said a year ago, they are essentially Luciferian.

I do not hate anyone for what they are, and especially for the ethnicity or faith into which they were born. They have no choice in the matter, so to hate them for it is as stupid as it is unjust. I do hate the global technocrats - for their world-looting greed, and for their twisted and blasphemous plans to play God and to merge His creation with their information technology.

It might disappoint some hardcore and genuine antisemites to learn that that I do not blame “the Jews” for the World Economic Forum, the Great Reset or the Covid plandemic. But I’m here to tell the truth, no matter who is disappointed or upset by it. So read on, and decide for yourself:-

Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset is Nothing New - The Rockefeller Files Updated

They’re like a pair of James Bond villains. Klaus Schwab, with his ridiculous accent, and his insanely misanthropic sidekick Yuval Harari – if you wanted to pick a pair guaranteed to attract popular loathing, you really couldn’t do any better.

All over the world, untold millions of people have woken up to the rolling globalist coup d’etat. Typically, having done a little research into the Covid ‘pandemic’ tyranny and the ongoing Net Zero deindustrialisation of the Western world, they conclude that it’s all the work of the World Economic Forum and its allies in the World Health Organization and the United Nations.

It is indeed very easy to see the ‘Great Reset’ as a plot hatched by Klaus Schwab and the WHO’s Marxist Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus. Very easy, but also very wrong. Because, far from being the stand-alone brainchild of Schwab, the Great Reset is in fact the attempted home run of a much older global elite drive for One World tyranny.

The knee-jerk liberal response to such an assertion is to scream ‘anti-Semitic conspiracy theory’, and the Internet is awash with claims that Schwab is the head of a Jewish plot to enslave or cull Mankind. Once again, however, just because something is easy to find doesn’t automatically make it true.

Let’s start with Schwab himself. His MittleEuropean surname and cartoon villain accent make the claim that he is one of the Tribe superficially believable, but they do not make it true. In fact, his father was Protestant, although young Klaus was raised in the faith of his Catholic mother.

Shortly after Hitler came to power, his German-speaking father moved from Switzerland to Germany to become Director of the Escher Wyss AG engineering firm. Not only did the firm’s pumps feature in Wehrmacht flamethrowers, but it even supplied equipment used by Nordsk Hydro in the top-secret efforts to enrich heavy water in the failed German effort to make a nuclear bomb.

Contrary to the careless Internet chatter of those who see Jews under every bed = and of those on the other side of the fence, who seek to discredit legitimate criticism of Zionism and Talmudist supremacism by circulating easily discredited allegations - there is thus not the faintest possibility that Schwab, born in 1938 in Nazi Germany, is even partly Jewish.

Message Nick Griffin

That said, it is true that the WEF’s resident ideologue is the homosexual Israeli historian Yuval Harari. Likewise, one doesn’t have to look hard in order to find memes focussing on Jewish individuals who are prominent in Big Pharma companies which profited from the Covid vaccinations and in the US government administrations which enforced lockdowns.

But does the presence of a number of high-profile Jewish individuals in the middle management of the Covid scam make it possible to claim that the much bigger and older drive for a Great Reset and a One World technocracy is a “Jewish plot”?

This is indeed the claim both of many anti-Semites and of the liberal mass media seeking to frighten the Sheeple away from even talking about the Great Reset.

The truth, however, is starkly different: From the very beginning, Klaus Schwab was only a front man for the long-running open conspiracy for ‘One World government’ operated by the Rockefeller Foundation.

Schwab was funded from the very start by David Rockefeller (above). His family Foundation bankrolled Schwab when he founded the European Management Forum in 1971. This was renamed as the World Economic Forum in 1987, but its funding and the source of its ideas never changed.

The intellectual precursor of the WEF was the Club of Rome. This was the body which first popularised the idea that the world’s population would soon outstrip its “carrying capacity”. The Club pulled together a sprawling team of environmentalist ‘experts’, economist and systems analysts to produce a series of alarmist and rapidly debunked claims of imminent resource exhaustion, pollution, climate change and mass starvation.

Just as with the WEF, the fingerprints of David Rockefeller were all over the Club of Rome from the get-go. It emerged from a symposium in the Bellagio conference center - owned by the Rockefeller Foundation

The most prominent of the Club’s founding fathers was Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei. A top manager first for Fiat and later with Olivetti, Peccei first came to the attention of the One Worlders when he made a speech which was spotted by Dean Rusk. Secretary of State under JFK, Rusk was of Scotch-Irish descent and President of the Rockefeller Foundation.

Peccei was introduced to Alexander King, a British chemist who had moved from being a WW2 advisor to the UK government to become an analyst working for first the European Productivity Agency and then the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. While both bodies were closely linked with the US Marshal Plan for the economic recovery (and subjugation) of Europe after WW2, the OECD has always been a ‘partner’ of the Rockefeller Foundation, whose grants have kickstarted many of its most important projects.

The first of the other two other founders of the Club of Rome was the Swiss German electrical engineer Hugo Thiemann, another systems analysist. The final key figure was Erich Jansch. The Austrian astronomer, engineer and systems analyst almost certainly was Jewish, since his mother’s maiden name was Kantor. His book, The Self-Organising Universe gave a degree of intellectual respectability to the fledgling forum, although its seminal work, The Limits to Growth, was written by Paul Ehrlich. Its wild alarmism about imminent mass starvation and resource shortages has aged extremely badly, but its influence on the WEF cannot be overstated.

Erhlich was Jewish, but his book was based on the work of yet another systems analyst Jim Forrester, who came from a WASP farming family from Nebraska.

Share

In 1991 the Club of Rome published an account of their work thus far, entitled “The First Global Revolution”. This discussed their efforts to promote One World Government:

“The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor…. In searching for a common enemy, we came up with the idea that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.”

The admission that ‘problems’ such as alleged manmade global warming were valued as intellectual cattle prods is very interesting in its own right. But a few sentences later comes the real revelation:

“All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself”.

This deeply misanthropic view has been developed in recent years by Yuval Harari. Likewise the incestuous links between Rockefeller institutions, Big Pharma and Big Government are repeatedly highlighted by events such as The National Foundation for Infectious Diseases 2022 honoring of Bruce G. Gellin. He just happens to be Chief of Global Public Health Strategy for The Rockefeller Foundation’s Pandemic Prevention Institute. Gellin is a key advisor to the WHO on global immunization.

The Foundation is also a key player in the promotion of climate alarmism and Net Zero deindustrialization projects, pouring vast sums into promoting “a just transition to inclusive green economic growth.”

Returning directly to the Rockefeller Foundation, it was created in 1913 by Standard Oil magnate John D. Rockefeller, his only son John Davison, and their primary business advisor, Frederick Taylor Gates. The latter was no relation of today’s Bill. Frederick Gates was a devout and very active Baptist. John D, the son of a notorious snake oil conman of German Protestant stock, was heavily influenced by his mother, who came from a staunchly abolitionist Baptist family.

Whether J.D. Rockefeller was an unmitigated rogue, or whether his enormous wealth was – like Henry Ford’s – hijacked for causes of which he would have disapproved, is open for debate.

What is not in question is that John Davison Rockefeller was a committed and deeply subversive internationalist. According to Wiki: “He financially supported programs of the League of Nations and crucially funded the formation and ongoing expenses of the Council on Foreign Relations and its initial headquarters building in New York in 1921.”

The sympathetic Wiki entry notes that “the WHO is modelled on the International Health Division of the Foundation. …. It has also been a supporter of and influence on the United Nations.”

John D’s grandson, David, became even more notorious for his ruthless use of the family fortune to promote all sorts of globalist initiatives, including, as we have seen, those which provided the intellectual and organisational core of the Great Reset.

His machinations were exposed by the great researcher Gary Allen, notably in his classic books None Dare Call It Conspiracy and The Rockefeller File. Since David Rockefeller’s protegees in the Club of Rome and World Economic Forum have now set the entire Western world on a slippery slope of deindustrialisation and globalisation, it is clear that the final book on the old man’s malevolent impact on our world is yet to be written.

Such a book, however, will be much more truthful – and useful – than the current plethora of online material which try to persuade the unwary either that the Great Reset is a “Jewish conspiracy” or that it is a “baseless right-wing conspiracy theory”. On the contrary, it is the work of a raceless, godless, plutocratic technocracy. And it is all too real.

Over the years, other giant oil interests joined in the Rockefeller war on humanity. More recently, the nerds and functional autists who dominate the ranks of the new IT magnates have also been attracted to the vision of a technocratic elite whose genius allows a Luciferian replacement of God-made humanity with manmade demigods.

The actual influence of the Rockefeller family has also been diluted by the development of a self-perpetuating management cadre within the Foundation. This is made up of representatives of the global elite from all over. There are WASPS, central European technocrats, figures from Third World corporations, including a significant number from India, alongside a few Jews, Greeks, Irish and so on. The common denominator is money, vast amounts of it, rather than any ethno-religious agenda.

To present this as a ‘Jewish’ movement is thus unfair and inaccurate – and also wide open to debunking, to the detriment of genuine warnings about the Great Resetters’ literally genocidal plans.

Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

The Nationalist Response to the Populist Challenge

 

The Nationalist Response to the Populist Challenge

We cannot beat them, or take them over, but we WILL stand on their shoulders

NICK GRIFFIN oct 2025 Follow Nick on Substack  Follow Nick on X

The populist electoral insurgency is a runaway juggernaut. In one white nation after another, soft-right populist parties are smashing rivals which have dominated the political scene since the middle of the last century. In Britain, the Tories - the oldest political party in the entire world - are under threat of extinction at the hands of Reform, which simultaneously is showing that it can also snatch even the safest Labour seats.

The same pattern can be seen over the whole of Western and central Europe. The unique political system of the USA means that the populist surge unfolded in a different way, but even there it is quite likely that Donald Trump would not have won his first time had it not been for the energising impact of the UK Brexit vote and the high-profile support of Nigel Farage in the close run campaign.

Anti-UKIP poster. Do the left actually believe this nonsense? I certainly don’t, and the ideology which needs to be injected into Reform must spring from the British tradition and have roots deep in our own history and national psyche. More on that in due course.

In most of ‘our’ world, we therefore see long-established ‘parties of government’ being knocked from the top of the political dung-heap by populists. What is the basic appeal of the insurgents? Partly that they are “Anyone Except the Above” in relation to the arrogant, failed and corrupt old parties.

Primarily, however, because their rhetoric and promises tap in to the deepest concerns of voters disgusted by the decadence of totalitarian liberalism, the destruction of their economic security, and horrified by the impact of mass immigration.

Of course, we all know that the populists’ figureheads are not genuine nationalists. Ignoring the dog-whistles, their most ‘extreme’ position on immigration is invariably a promise to expel illegals and other criminals, to restrict the use of the most visible symbols of Islamic fundamentalism, to let in further immigrants only if they come to work, and to compel the newcomers to speak the language and to ‘integrate’.

Please help to spread the word that Nick Griffin is back as the intellectual and strategic mastermind of British ethno-nationalism.

Share

This is very different from the ethno-nationalist position. We’ve got no problem at all with deporting the criminals, ‘single men of military age’ and opposing Islamification. But we also know that the problems which the civnat populists use to appeal to worried voters are important in terms of security and symbolism, but very minor in terms of demography.

We understand why ordinary, law-abiding British taxpayers are particularly angry about the 40,000 or so totally unvetted Dover Boat Scroungers who are ferried across the Channel each year by the Royal Navy and the RNLI. But their numbers and potential future demographic impact are dwarfed by the million or so who arrive ‘legally’ every year.

They walk through our airports armed with visas for work, study, tourism, family reunions and accepted refugee status. Does their ‘legal’ status means that half-a-million Hindu Indians coming in each year do not contribute to the ‘Great Replacement’? Is the fact that many of them take jobs here really a good thing, when we have several millions of our own folk unable to find work, and ten million more not even required to look for it?

As for ‘integration’, let’s not beat about the bush, it’s the last thing we want, because the more ‘successfully’ immigrants integrate, the greater the problem with miscegenation. You don’t have to be fully clued up on the Kalergi Plan to understand that, for a global minority like the white nations, Integration = Annihilation.

Hence, while millions of voters expect the populists to ‘give us our country back’, we are not fooled. We know that - even if the populists deliver on all their promises - they will not make any significant different to the eventual outcome.

Message Nick Griffin

At the same time, however, we cannot just pretend the populists aren’t there. We know that specific leaders, Meloni, Farage, Le Pen, the German lesbian, the Swedih Zionist, etc, etc, will in the end fail to deliver and become election-losers in their turn. But, in the meantime, the appeal of populist parties will remain the ultimate roadblock for genuine nationalists who might still be tempted down the electoral road.

Furthermore, we can already see their successors being set up ready to step in and offer the voters ‘the real thing’. “Reform let you down? Try new, improved Advance!” Out of the NeoCon frying pan and into the revisionist Zionist fire.

The populists are here, and they’re almost certainly here to stay for many elections to come. Which is particularly hard on ethno-nationalists, because they feed on our potential like vampires. Look at any of the civnat populist parties currently giving the liberals nightmares and. behind them, you will see the desiccated corpse of a genuine, ethno-nationalist party,

It was the ethno-nationalists who broke the taboo against speaking critically about immigration. We were the ones smeared, beaten, arrested, jailed, or even murdered, for daring to stand up for our people in the decades before our people were angry enough to start standing up for themselves.

We argued for sovereignty and for economic protectionism. We warned that early calls for ‘tolerance’ of perverts were the thin end of a wedge which would eventually become a full-scale cultural Marxist war against family values, complete with tyrannical repression of those who defend them.

We were right about all those things, and the populists now base their appeal on nudges, winks and half-measures on the issues which we pioneered. In the case of Farage in particular, it goes even further than that. He and his first party, UKIP, were systematically promoted - by the left-wing BBC in particular - precisely as a safety valve, the only remaining way to stop the British National Party.

Farage himself has boasted of this, while Professor Edward Dutton, a very well informed and astute observer of the British political scene, published an appraisal here on Substack asserting that “Farage stood on Nick Griffin’s shoulders”.

Which is all well and good. We know how they dealt with us, the question is, how must we deal with them?

The answer, my friends, is to return the favour. The civnats have reached where they are now because they took advantage of the work of the ethno-nationalist pioneers. Now we must take advantage of their advance in order to advance towards our goals. And, just as with us back in the day, it is their very success which makes them vulnerable.

So come with me, and help us to stand on their shoulders. Don’t worry, I’m got going to replace naïve fantasies about ethno-nationalist election victory with equally idiotic claims that we can ‘capture’ the populist parties, or even nudge them towards improved policies or delivery on more of their vacuous promises.

But a systematic and intelligent programme to inject genuine nationalist ideas into the populist parties will bring serious rewards. On their own, they are unlikely to have what can realistically be called revolutionary impact, but put them together with the other proposals which you will see here a bit further down the line, and you will see why I more optimistic now for the future of ethno-nationalism than I have been for decades.

The ideological infiltration of Reform and its various populist sister parties is one of the foundation stones of the political house we must build. It can be done. It must be done. It will be done. And, in the next part of this series, I am going to tell you exactly how we’re going to do it.

All the posts in this series are guaranteed to be here, for everybody to read for free. Subscribe for free so you get notified as soon as they are published. Or consider a paid subscription to help support my work and to begin to build for the future. Many thanks, Nick Griffin.

Upgrade to paid

The Cancer On The Right

The Cancer On The Right

By A Torba 

Let us be clear so there is no confusion and no room for misinterpretation: we are not conservatives.

That word has become a mark of surrender, a synonym for the managed decline of a nation we refuse to abandon. Our allegiance is not to a decaying set of liberal principles, to a faltering democracy that serves global interests, to “lower taxes” or to a “rules-based international order” that has bled our people dry. We will not conserve the hollowed-out institutions of a dying empire.

Our allegiance is sworn to something real, something eternal: to our God, our people, and our homeland. It is the soil beneath our feet, the blood in our veins, and the spirit that calls us to greatness.

We have no interest in conserving a political system mired in bipartisan decay, where two heads of the same beast promise change and deliver only ruin. We will not perpetuate a cycle of foreign wars and endless aid to distant nations while our own communities crumble into dust and despair. We refuse to uphold an economic order that leaves our own citizens struggling, indentured to a global market that despises our traditions, our faith, and our very existence.

Our mission is to build something new. Not a fragile imitation of the past, but an order of strength, clarity, and purpose, dedicated first, last, and always to the national interest. We don’t want to turn back the clock. We want to forge a future worthy of our nation’s legacy.

For over a century now the liberal and conservative establishment have captained this ship. They inherited a vessel of unmatched power and prestige, and with a toxic blend of incompetence, arrogance, and malice, they steered it directly into an iceberg of globalism, demographic decline, and cultural erosion. The steel of the ship groans, the ice grinds against the hull, and still, they toast their success in the captain’s lounge, blind to the icy water rising around their ankles.

We are done begging for a seat at their table.

Now, I know what the gatekeepers of the “acceptable right” are going to say next. We’ve all seen their talking points, recycled with nervous certainty. Let’s take Seth Dillon, for example, who recently tried to lecture the movement with this warning:

“No enemies to the right’ isn’t a strategy for beating the left; it’s a strategy for letting bad actors with bad ideas gain control of the movement unopposed. The left is in retreat right now precisely because they gave the reins to their radicals. You’d have to be insane to copy them. You don’t ‘win’ by refusing treatment when you have cancer. It just spreads — often very quickly — and then you die.”

He’s right about one thing. You don’t ignore cancer. You identify it, and you cut it out, ruthlessly and completely, before it kills the host.

His diagnosis, however, is a catastrophic failure of vision, a willful blindness that has defined the controlled opposition for decades. He points his finger at the men with fire in their bellies—the ones who speak the uncomfortable truths and refuse to bow to the dying consensus—and he calls them the disease.

And this is where the worldview of men like Seth Dillon completely collapses. They call us “radicals” and position themselves as the sensible center-right, the true conservatives. The reality? They are not to our right. On the only political spectrum that matters now, they are far, far to our left.

They are the “right wing” of the globalist machine. Their function is not to win, but to fail gracefully, to provide the illusion of opposition while ensuring that nothing fundamental ever changes. They are the designated losers and they are paid handsomely to make the game look real.

So no, Mr. Dillon, we are not worried about “bad actors” on our right. Because the people you call bad actors are simply those who have correctly identified you as the enemy. You are the controlled opposition. You are the cancer. And we are the cure.

The cancer isn’t the guy who’s too edgy or too angry for their donor-friendly galas.

The cancer on the right is the alien tribe that has taken the reins of the party for the exclusive benefit of their people and nation, at the expense of our people and nation. It’s the political class with a loyalty to a foreign land, who wrap themselves in our flag only to sell off our sovereignty piece by piece. They send our sons to die in deserts to protect foreign borders while our own are hemorrhaging. They drain our treasury to fund a foreign military machine, while our own infrastructure crumbles into rust. They scream “isolationist!” and “antisemite!” at anyone who suggests that maybe, just maybe, America’s blood and treasure should be spent on American interests first.

That is the tumor. It’s a parasitic growth that has woven itself into the heart of our movement, redirecting its lifeblood to serve a foreign body while the host sickens.

So when we say “no enemies to the right,” we are not inviting everyone to the table. We are making a declaration of who our people are. We are defining who truly belongs on our side of that line we drew. Our “right” is actually right wing—the nationalists, the patriots, the builders. The cancer we’re cutting out is the globalist, Zionist, neoconservative establishment that Dillon and his ilk are paid to protect. They are not to our right. They are not even on our map.

Comparing us to the left is a fool’s errand. The left is imploding because their radicalism is the logical, suicidal conclusion of their ideology. Our “radicalism” is the simple, healthy immune response of a nation that has decided it wants to live. We’re not copying their playbook; we are performing the surgery they were too cowardly, and conservatives were too polite, to do for generations.

The operation is underway. The cancer is being exposed. And we will cut it out.

History does not remember the comfortable, the cautious, or the compromised. It does not build monuments to the committees that managed decline. It remembers the pioneers, the warriors, the visionaries. It remembers the men and women who, when their world was set to burn, had the audacity to build an ark.

So no, we are not conservatives. That word no longer describes a political belief; it describes a function. It is the job title for the designated loser, the gatekeeper of a dying order, the warden of a national prison. They are paid to slow the decay, to make the end more palatable, but never, ever to reverse it. We are not here to negotiate the terms of our surrender. We are here to cancel it. So let them conserve their rotting institutions.

We will rebuild a nation.

Andrew Torba
Christ is King

Colonel Macgregor: America’s Collapse Will Create A New Financial System

In this hard-hitting conversation, Jay sits down with Colonel Douglas Macgregor to dissect the unraveling of U.S. global dominance and the rise of a multipolar world. Macgregor argues that Washington’s addiction to military coercion, economic sanctions, and moral posturing has left America isolated and financially brittle, while China, Russia, and India quietly build alternative trade and monetary systems. He warns that U.S. diplomacy has been replaced by bullying and that the reckoning will come in the form of inflation, declining trust at home, and waning credibility abroad. Follow Douglas on X: https://x.com/DougAMacgregor Join us LIVE at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference on January 25 & 26. Tickets: https://VRICMedia.com

What Is to be Done? The vital work of ethno-nationalists as liberalism dies. Part 1

 

What Is to be Done?

The vital work of ethno-nationalists as liberalism dies. Part 1

NICK GRIFFIN 0ct 2025 Follow Nick on substack Follow Nick on X

The way ahead for genuine nationalists is at last clear. There has been a period of confusion and drift since the political establishments of country after country beat down the nationalist electoral insurgencies which once appeared to be the way forward. But this must - and will - end now.

There have been three great stumbling blocks in the way of effective nationalist action for getting on for two decades: First, the fact that only a very limited number of people understood just how bad things were going to get. Second, that many of those who did understand it were still fixated on the idea that electoral victory would give us the power to put things right.

Third, even once it became obvious that the growing success of populist parties had closed the electoral road to genuine, ethno-nationalism, there has been a distinct lack of strategic vision and tactical innovation.

That is partly a reflection on the collective leadership of the ‘movement’ but, to be fair to all concerned, it is only with some of the most recent developments that the full extent of the potential for a quietly revolutionary ethno-nationalism has become clear to me, let alone to others with less experience.

Fortunately, the first two of the three stumbling blocks have now gone. A whole slew of opinion polls has confirmed that the 2025 surge in support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is rooted in a widespread understanding that the nation faces disaster. A massive JL Partners poll carried out during party conference season, for example, found that fully three-quarters of voters say that “Britain is broken”.

Even 59% of those who still plan to vote for the failing Labour government agree that the country is ruined, with the figure rising to 91% of Reform supporters. Pollsters have found deep frustration across all regions and age groups. In Britain, the strongest sense of realistic pessimism was found in the West Midlands, where 87% said the country is broken. Even in multi-cultural, metropolitan, British-minority London, the figure is 59%.

The advance of Reform and of similar populist parties in most other West European countries shows that an awakening to grim reality is not confined to the UK. It is, of course, far deeper than sympathy for electoral insurgency too. The drastic lurch in voting patterns only reflects a much more profound shift towards identity politics. While the 20^th century was dominated by individualism and identity based on class or material ambitions, we are seeing before our very eyes the 21^st century retribalisation of the nations and peoples of the West.

They are under threat, they know it, and they understand they have to do something about it. The in-their-faces tribalism on display during the Raise the Colours explosion on the summer of 2025 is an even more significant sign than the Southport Riots of 2024. Reform’s polling figures merely reflect the extraordinary tectonic shifts rumbling and lurching beneath the surface.

Truly, the first of the three stumbling blocks – the once widespread view that there was nothing seriously wrong - has been blasted to dust by real life.

What about the second, the electoral victory obsession? Well, there are semi-moribund micro-parties which persist in throwing their shrunken reserves of money and manpower into yet another utterly futile electoral Charge of the Light Brigade every few years.

There are others who avoid the inevitable disillusion brought by such drubbings by telling their few followers that this is something they will do at some stage in the future – with childish fantasies of glorious although totally unearned success.

Despite such surviving lumps of rock-headed stupidity, however, it is fair to say that the vast majority of thinking, genuine, ethno-nationalists have moved on. When I published my essays Tooth Fairy Politics and No Parliamentary Road five or six years ago, there was still some resistance to my message, among some European nationalists as well as some in Britain who have since changed their minds. Times have changed even more, and the second road block - the superstition of electoralism - has also been smashed apart by the high explosives of reality.

Share

Which just leaves the third: Nationalists still don’t have any sort of coherent picture of a new way ahead. Despite some hard work and progress in isolated fields, the theory and practice of effective resistance have remained disjointed and piecemeal.

Various leaders and organisations have carried out useful experiments and worthwhile initiatives, but these advances have started essentially from ground zero, and in different fields. As a result, it is in no way a criticism of the thought and work that has gone into them to say that the progress that has resulted has thus far tended to remain isolated and fragmentary.

The need to “build communities” is the field in which we have seen the most progress, some of it striking enough to have already produced squeals of anguish from the left. But, with several honourable exceptions, even this has tended to get stuck at the theoretical level. Holding a couple of physical get-togethers a year and hooking up online for some video games is a start, but to describe this as “community building” is to expose a serious lack of understanding of the concept, let alone of real life.

There are some fine examples of counter-power initiatives being built in several places in Europe, but very few nationalists in Britain even know about them, let alone are making any effort to develop similar operations here or to connect them with an overall strategy.

This ends now. This essay provides the blueprint for a serious, constructive, coherent, legal and moral response by active ethno-nationalists to the current plight of our people. I am not for one moment claim to have formulated all these ideas alone. I have adopted some from elsewhere, adapted others and added some which are indeed mine.

But this is the first time they have been brought together and circulated as a coherent strategy manual. Taken as a starting point, discussed, experimented with and put into practice, these proposals will form the foundation stones of a coherent, multi-generational, ethno-nationalist response to the challenges we already face.

More important still, the plan of action which follows is specifically designed to help the indigenous peoples of Britain and Europe through the Convergence of Catastrophes - the Great Replacement; War; Demographic Winter and its ensuing social, financial and employment crashes - which will overwhelm the liberal-consumer-capitalist system. “Winter is coming”, but here is the outline of the long path to Spring.

It is, as you will learn, a threefold approach. As such, there is something that literally everyone can do. Even better, there are things which all existing organisations can do, in their own right and with their existing structures. The sheer range of effort envisaged is such that no single organisation, let alone individual, could possibly attempt to do it all.

Some people will be more suited to, and more inspired by, one part of this plan than the others. Perfect! Make that your mission and set to it, secure in the knowledge that others are working in different fields. While their successes will indirectly help you and all the rest, the inevitable setbacks which will occur in some areas will not for one moment invalidate either the overall collective effort or your own part therein.

I am certainly not demanding that everyone has to come and work under me. Far from it, the key point of this analysis and set of proposals is that they can be used as a guide to effective action not within one separate organisation, nor even just within this country. “Let a thousand flowers bloom”.

This document sets out the three broad strategic fields in which ethno-nationalists need to work in the foreseeable future. It also includes some specific examples of tactical and practical initiatives which can be used to advance in each of the three areas of endeavour.

We will examine each in more detail but, by way of concise introduction, they are:

1) Systematic ideological infiltration of the populist parties;

2) Non-electoral political organisation. This in turn subdivides into i) a campaign on the absolutely central principle of recognition of our rights as indigenous peoples and, ii) a programme for the acquisition by groups of nationalists of assets and skills which will allow them to operate as political and cultural leadership cadres in their own local communities;

3) The development of local and national charities and parallel institutions designed to give our people ethnic consciousness, social cohesion and the beginnings of parallel economic and institutional structures.

I will be developing each of these three subjects over the next few posts here on Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. Make sure you’re notified, sign up NOW as a free or a much-appreciated paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

You're currently a free subscriber to Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Why We Must Build Our Own Future

Why We Must Build Our Own Future 

By Andrew Torba 

Let me start by being perfectly clear: you are not going to infiltrate the system and magically take over legacy institutions. This isn’t some Mission Impossible movie or Fight Club, it’s real life. Anyone who genuinely believes this is possible has clearly never set foot inside a real legacy institution. I am talking about the corporate boardrooms, the government agencies, the universities, and the mainstream media conglomerates. These are not blank slates or neutral grounds. They are highly sophisticated systems engineered over generations with one primary purpose: to perpetuate themselves and eliminate any threat to their established dogma.

These institutions possess a powerful immune system. It is a literal set of defensive mechanisms designed to identify and expel dissident thought. They have endless bureaucratic procedures that can bury any reform effort in red tape. They have human resources departments that function as ideological compliance units, enforcing a secular progressive creed. They have anonymous reporting hotlines that encourage coworkers to snitch on each other for wrongthink. There are layers upon layers of protection designed specifically to prevent what some would naively call a dissident coup.

If you enter one of these institutions, you face a binary choice with no middle ground. You will conform, or you will be annihilated. You will slowly, inevitably, become the very thing you claim to oppose. You will be pressured to attend mandatory training seminars that label your Christian faith as hate speech. You will be forced to sign loyalty oaths to ideologies that dismantle the natural family and deny biological reality. You will be expected to celebrate degeneracy and mock tradition. If you refuse to comply, you will be ostracized, investigated, and finally ejected. Your career will be terminated and your name will be blacklisted across the entire industry. This is not a theory. This is the lived experience of millions of our people who tried to make a stand from within.

Just look at these institutions themselves. Do we really want to encourage young people to spend the next thirty years living a lie so they can magically “capture” them at some distant point in the future? They are rotting husks. Hollowed out cathedrals of a dead century. They operate on pure inertia and a deep, desperate fear. They are managed by cowardly souls who long ago traded their convictions for a steady paycheck and a vague sense of prestige. They believe in nothing but their own self preservation. They can smell your dissent, your faith, your love for your people, and they will react like a body rejecting a transplanted organ.

The idea that you can simply lay low for thirty years, hide your true beliefs, and slowly rise through the ranks to take over this dying establishment is not a strategy. It is a fantasy. It is a voluntary life sentence in a spiritual prison. It is a plan to waste your one precious life chained to a corpse.

We need a fundamental shift in perspective. We are not in the 20th century anymore. We are charging forward into a technological revolution that is reshaping human existence. Artificial intelligence is redefining creativity and labor. Humanoid robotics will transform our economies. Decentralized networks and cryptocurrency are breaking the monopoly of old financial powers. In this new world, does anyone seriously believe that capturing the headquarters of a defunct newspaper or a decaying Ivy League university will matter? These places are already irrelevant. They are corpses that have not yet finished falling.

The institutions that will hold trust and influence in the future do not exist today. They will not be captured. They will be built. And they will be built by us. They will look nothing like the top down, centralized, sclerotic structures of the past. They will be decentralized, transparent, and community oriented. They will be built on truth, not lies. On strength, not weakness. On faith, not nihilism.

Therefore, if you truly desire to win the long term battle for the soul of our civilization, you must stop playing defense. You must abandon the failed strategy of trying to capture what is already dead.

You must build something.

Start with the most important institution. Build a strong, faithful family. Raise courageous children. Teach them the truth of God s word and the history of their people. This is the unshakeable foundation upon which everything else rests.

Build an honest business. Create real value for your community. Hire people who share your values. Become a pillar of your local economy and demonstrate that we do not need to beg for crumbs from the table of corporations that despise us.

Build a real community. Find your people. Worship together. Support each other. Create parallel networks of trust, commerce, and education that operate entirely outside the crumbling legacy system.

Build new media platforms. Build new financial systems. Build new schools for our children.

This is precisely the vision we have been fiercely building at Gab for nearly a decade. While others scrambled for a seat at their crumbling table, we built our own. We built a place online that they do not control and cannot touch. They cannot dictate a single post made here. They cannot demand a single account ban. They cannot tell us what to think, what to say, or that our artificial intelligence must reject a Christian worldview. We control our own infrastructure, our own code, our own community, and by the grace of God, we control our own destiny. This is what building looks like.

We do not need their recognition. We do not need their permission. We do not need their validation. We need our own foundation. Our own infrastructure. Our own future.

They are clinging desperately to the past. We are building the future.

Stop trying to take their castle. It is a ruin filled with mold and haunted by the ghosts of compromise and cowardice.

Go build your own.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab AI Inc
Christ Is King

Click here to view this email as a blog post and please share it!

If you enjoy our newsletter please consider supporting our efforts to defend faith and freedom. 

Here are all the ways you can support our mission today

Upgrade to GabPRO

Make a One-Time Donation

Advertise Your Business: Use Gab Ads to reach a massive audience.

Visit the Gab Shop: Purchase merchandise to show your support publicly. 

Upgrade to Gab AI Plus: Support our efforts to build a pro-American, pro-Christian AI model and platform.