New Report Confirms that NHS Waiting Lists Have Risen After EU Rules Implement

BNP News

Predictions that patient waiting lists would rise dramatically if European Union rules on working hours were implemented have proven to be completely accurate in a new study issued by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS).

The EU rules, which were implemented last August, have seen thousands of patients waiting up to 18 weeks longer than usual for surgery, the report said.

“The increase is predictable,” John Black, RCS president was quoted as saying. “If you have the same number of patients, no more doctors and ask them to work less then it is inevitable that the time available for elective procedures will reduce and waiting lists grow.”

He pointed out that the rule was so ridiculous that “most European countries had bypassed the legislation by either not monitoring compliance or, as in Germany and Holland, finding ways around the directive.”

The report found that 80 percent of consultant surgeons and two thirds of surgical trainees said “patient care had deteriorated since the directive was implemented.”

A 2009 RCS report said that there were not enough surgeons to fill rotas if they worked only 48 hours a week and that 90 percent of trainee doctors were exceeding their timetabled hours on a weekly basis.

That survey also revealed that 55 percent of surgeons reported being pressured to falsely declare their actual hours worked and that 68 percent felt that their training and skills had deteriorated as a result of shift-working patterns introduced to meet the working time regulations.

At least 71 percent felt the reduction in overall hours had not led to any improvement in their work-life balance.

In March 2009, think-tank Open Europe issued a study on the EU’s working time directive called titled Time’s UP! The case against the EU’s 48 hour working week.

“In the middle of a full-blown recession, we estimate that the Working Time Directive as it currently applies in the UK is already costing the economy between £3.5 billion and £3.9 billion every year,” the report said.

Open Europe goes on to quote a NHS nurse in London as saying that the “important practice of ensuring patients see the same nurse could be threatened by a maximum 48 hour week. ‘It is common sense that there will be nurse shortages once all the nurses have worked their maximum permitted number of hours.’”

Their report continued: “In 2000, the UK Government gave way in a similar stage of the negotiations, that time on a proposal which limited working hours for junior doctors — the effect of which was tantamount to losing between 4,300 and 9,900 junior doctors, according to the British Medical Association.
Click here To Join the British National Party 

Con-Dems Council House Secure Tenancy Plan What Will it Mean In Reality

Author, Horwich Nationalists

It was with some alarm that I heard today that the Con-Dem Axis of Evil were today announcing that they intended to change the Secure Tenancy agreements of millions of British Low income families!

I could not help thinking when it was mentioned that they will look at British Tenants circumstances and how they change over time. Twinned with the rise in the Population of the UK, through Immigration and the growth of the Ethnic population of the UK.

That many indigenous British people especially the Elderly will now be forced from their homes , were they raised their children and put a lifetime of effort and money into the properties the rent on behalf of the councils, in order that Immigrant and asylum seeking clans can have their properties! who,s rent will be paid for the oppressed British Worker once again.
So in effect not only will we be made homeless but we will be expected to pay for it to!
Alarmist you may think but by the past standards of the Marxist elite that now dominate the halls of Westminster, anything is possible that is to detriment of the true British People!

If you are reading this and thinking my goodness what can I do about it, WELL their is something that you can do join the British National party now, to have a SECURE HOME, A SECURE NATION, AND MORE THAN ANYTHING A SECURE FUTURE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN  click this link to join NOW! https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html 

An article on the Christian view of what is happening to the western world through the policy of mass 3rd world Immigration, once again convinces me , that we are not just up against the forces of Marx and Multi Nationals, But! are facing the REAL! Forces of Darkness.

before you scoff and say well whatever religious Nutter!

just read on! And you will see that our battle is not just for the NATION, BUT FOR IT,S SOULS ALSO! 

From the Good News magazine 

Suddenly, immigration is becoming a bigger issue throughout the Western world. Governments around the globe are very concerned about potential problems that massive immigration may bring.

Immigration: How a Foreign Invasion Is Reshaping the West

In the last 50 years, millions of people from the Third World have moved into the Western democracies. Many have contributed to the welfare of these nations, but others lack work skills, proper education and democratic convictions. What will it mean if and when these ever-growing minorities begin to constitute the majority in several key countries?

by Melvin Rhodes

The American state of Arizona, which borders Mexico, recently passed a law authorizing police to inquire of people they've stopped for other legitimate reasons if they are in the United States legally, should there be sufficient reason to suspect otherwise, and to ask for proof of their legal status in such case. Illegal immigrants have contributed to mounting crime, increasing health and educational costs and other problems in the state.
Most of Arizona's citizens support the law, though some organizations outside the state have announced boycotts, which could cost it a great deal. Even the federal government is considering filing lawsuits to prevent the law from being implemented.

Immigration reshaping Western countries

A car bomb placed in New York City's Times Square on May 1, 2010, was the 11th attempted terrorist act in the city of New York since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The bomb—which, thankfully, failed to go off as planned—raised some deeply troubling questions about even legal immigration.
How could a young Pakistani immigrant who lived the American dream possibly want to kill hundreds of his fellow citizens? The United States and other Western democracies, still coming to terms with radical Islam, are finding it hard to fathom. It just doesn't fit into the multicultural ideal!
France, Belgium, Italy and other European countries are passing laws to block Islamic women from wearing full veils in public. Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel is insisting the country's large Turkish population should assimilate, while the Turkish prime minister insists they should have their own separate schools to protect their Islamic identity.
Meanwhile, a Danish cartoonist whose cartoon depicting the prophet Muhammad led to riots in a number of countries was threatened by an ax-wielding intruder, and a Swedish cartoonist was physically attacked by protesters shouting "Allah is great!" as he gave a lecture on free speech. Muslims insist that freedom of speech, long cherished in the West, has its limits.
In Britain, the issue of immigration may have cost Prime Minister Gordon Brown the recent election. When a 65-year-old supporter of his own party approached him during the campaign and expressed concern about all the immigrants from Eastern Europe flowing into her neighborhood, Mr. Brown was overheard in his car describing her as a "bigoted woman."  Leaders clearly don't like the sensitive issue of immigration being brought up.
But it's not going to go away.

Majorities becoming minorities in their own land

People are feeling increasingly threatened by the changing demographics in their own nations. The ethnic composition of Western countries is rapidly altering due to massive immigration in the last few decades. The United States alone took in 10 million more immigrants in the seven years following Sept. 11, 2001—many of them from countries rife with radical Islamists. To many citizens, this just doesn't make sense.
An increasing number of Americans are aware that these demographic changes will lead to a majority nonwhite population in their own lifetimes. How they handle this will determine the country's future. As Time magazine put it: "How the current majority reacts to its incipient minority status is the most crucial socio-demographic issue facing the country" (Gregory Rodriguez, "The White Anxiety Crisis," March 22, 2010, international edition).
In an amazing break from tradition, many Western nations changed their immigration policies after World War II and welcomed millions of people from the Third World. Even the United States, often deemed a cultural "melting pot," had an immigration policy prior to 1965 that favored maintaining the racial status quo.
The late Senator Edward Kennedy's 1965 immigration bill deliberately changed earlier policy, welcoming a big influx of immigrants from the world's poorer nations. At the time, Americans were assured it would not alter the ethnic mix and social fabric of their nation.
Now it's evident this assurance was false. One could easily make the argument that the election of America's first African-American president would not have happened without the reality of changing demographics.

Immigration leading to unrest

The issue of immigration was briefly discussed on NBC's Chris Matthews Show on May 9, 2010.
During the program, John Heilemann of New York magazine observed: "We're going through one of these once-in-a-century transformations that cuts across a lot of different things—cultural change, there's big demographic change, there's big economic change, and technological change, and it makes people really nervous. It's been going on for about 15 years in America—the sense of anxiety, the sense we've lost control of our lives."
Also on the show was Cynthia Tucker, a columnist with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who offered this perspective: "I've always thought that this great melting pot or salad, however you want to describe this diverse nation, works as long as the economy is good, as long as the pie is growing and every American believes he or she has an opportunity to get a piece of that pie, we're all pretty happy." 
However, now that the economy is not doing so well, the United States could be in for a more stressful time when it comes to assimilating the various ethnic groups that now live in the country.
The same applies elsewhere, of course. Some of the eurozone countries are on the brink of financial collapse due to decades of overspending. Severe government spending cuts are inevitable. The nations have already seen unemployment rise. Without jobs, many are already blaming immigrants for their situation.
In the latest election in Britain, the anti-immigrant British National Party almost tripled the share of the vote it received in the 2005 election. In fact, anti-immigrant parties are seeing growing support in a number of European countries.
The perceived threat applies on several different levels.

Security a growing concern

Besides feeling that their way of life is threatened, both culturally and economically, people are also becoming more concerned about security as radical terror movements increasingly recruit homegrown terrorists. Commenting on the recent attempted bombing in Times Square, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies professor Fouad Ajami wrote the following in the May 10, 2010, Wall Street Journal:
"'A Muslim has no nationality except his belief,' the intellectual godfather of the Islamists, Egyptian Sayyid Qutb, wrote decades ago. Qutb's 'children' are everywhere now; they carry the nationalities of foreign lands and plot against them. The Pakistani-born Faisal Shahzad [who set up the car bomb] is a devotee of Sayyid Qutb's doctrine, and Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, was another.
"Qutb was executed by the secular dictatorship of [Egyptian President] Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1966. But his thoughts and legacy endure. Globalization, the shaking up of continents, the ease of travel, and the doors for immigration flung wide open by Western liberal societies have given Qutb's worldview greater power and relevance. What can we make of a young man like Shahzad working for [the cosmetics company] Elizabeth Arden, receiving that all-American degree, the MBA, jogging in the evening in Bridgeport, then plotting mass mayhem in Times Square?
"The Islamists are now within the gates. They fled the fires and the failures of the Islamic world but brought the ruin with them. They mock national borders and identities. A parliamentary report issued by Britain's House of Commons on the London Underground bombings of July 7, 2005, lays bare this menace and the challenge it poses to a system of open borders and modern citizenship.
"The four men who pulled off those brutal attacks, the report noted, 'were apparently well integrated into British society.' Three of them were second-generation Britons born in West Yorkshire. The oldest, a 30-year-old father of a 14-month-old infant, 'appeared to others as a role model to young people.' One of the four, 22 years of age, was a boy of some privilege; he owned a red Mercedes given to him by his father and was given to fashionable hairstyles and designer clothing...Two of the four, rather like Faisal Shahzad, had spent time in Pakistan before they pulled off their deed.
"A year after the London terror, hitherto tranquil Canada had its own encounter with the new Islamism. A ring of radical Islamists were charged with plotting to attack targets in southern Ontario with fertilizer bombs. A school-bus driver was one of the leaders of these would-be jihadists.
"A report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service unintentionally echoed the British House of Commons findings. 'These individuals are part of Western society, and their "Canadianness" makes detection more difficult. Increasingly, we are learning of more and more extremists that are homegrown. The implications of this shift are profound'" ("Islam's Nowhere Men: Millions Like Faisal Shahzad Are Unsettled by a Modern World They Can Neither Master nor Reject," emphasis added).

Prophecy warned of consequences for national sins

The modern descendants of the ancient Israelites include many of the nations that make up today's Western world. In Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, God promised tremendous physical blessings if they would obey Him, but He also warned them of the dire consequences of disobedience. The promised blessings for obedience are awe-inspiring; the assurances of punishment for sins are deeply troubling.
These chapters make for sobering reading when we consider trends in recent years. In Deuteronomy 32, verse 25 warns of "terror within"—a prophecy clearly being fulfilled now, with an even greater increase in the problem likely still to come.
The apostle Paul spoke of how God created "from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings" (Acts 17:26).
Of course, this passage does not mean that correctly controlled immigration is inherently wrong, seeing that when the Israelites left Egypt the door was opened for a certain number of non-Israelites to dwell among them. However, they had to leave their culture behind and abide by the same laws God gave the Israelites. We are now learning the negative consequences of the multicultural society that has been propagated for the last 50 years.
Mixing cultures, and especially religions, can be volatile! We should have known that before the change in immigration laws just by looking at history and at other societies where mixing religions has led to serious tension and conflict.
The people of Europe feel particularly threatened. With higher population densities than the United States and closer proximity to the volatile Middle East, many West European nations have significantly high Muslim populations. Add to this Europe's low birthrate in contrast to the high Islamic birthrate, and the potential for violent conflict only increases.
And as we've seen, it's not just security that is threatened. Economics also play a major role. God Himself warned of serious consequences for the native peoples as a result of immigration: "The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail" (Deuteronomy 28:43-44).
In other words, the strangers—those of foreign cultures and religions—will end up on top, in control and in time possibly dictating a way of life foreign to the indigenous population.
This is, of course, exactly what happened when European settlers started arriving in North America, Australia and elsewhere—they ended up on top and in control, displacing the native populations. Now, two or three centuries later, they are the ones losing control to newer arrivals.
Immigration trends and birthrates show that sometime in this century the peoples who currently dominate most of the Western nations will be minorities in their own lands. Whatever you may think of the ethnic mix, the reality is that significant change is underway, and it's threatening no less than the future of Western civilization. GN
 read more at www.gnmagazine

Related Resource

The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy
Where does the United States of America appear in Bible prophecy? Does Bible prophecy neglect to mention major nations such as the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom? In fact, many prophecies do mention these nations.
subscribe to the Good News Magazine! http://www.gnmagazine.org/subscribe/index.htm

Rochdale Asian Gang force English Girl, 14, to be prostitute in Greater Manchester

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

From Bolton Patriot

Girl, 14, forced to be prostitute in Greater Manchester

A 14-year-old was forced into prostitution and sexually abused by a series of men after going missing from her home in Greater Manchester.

Nine men were convicted in connection with the abuse, which took place in February and March 2008.

The girl, described as vulnerable, was "used as a commodity" for sexual activity with the men, police said.

Supt Paul Savill, of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), said she had been through an "absolutely horrifying ordeal".

Police said the girl, who first went missing on 16 February 2008, had been abused by a number of different men "as she went from one vulnerable situation to another".

In each case the men identified her vulnerability to take advantage of her.

In a statement issued following the convictions, the girl said: "These people exploit young girls, introduce them to prostitution, feed them drugs and alcohol and tell them they love them.

'Changed my life'

"I know this because it has happened to me and it has changed my life enormously.

"I just hope that people will be more aware of this now and will be able to prevent this from happening to other vulnerable young girls."

Continue reading the main story
“
Start Quote
She has been treated like a commodity: beaten, threatened and sexually exploited”
End Quote
Supt Paul Savill

Greater Manchester Police
Over a series of separate hearings and trials, Manchester Crown Court heard how the girl was first picked up in Rochdale town centre by Asad Hassan.

He took her to a nightclub where she was plied with drink and taken to a flat along with two other men, Basharat Mohammed and Mohammed Atif, who all later sexually exploited her.

A few days later she travelled to Manchester where she met another man, Aftab Khan, who also plied her with alcohol and drugs before ordering her to work as a prostitute.

Over the next 10 days she was forced to have sex with a number of men for money, before flagging down a couple in the street and begging them for help.

Supt Savill said the level of abuse the girl had suffered was "almost beyond belief".

"She has been treated like a commodity: beaten, threatened and sexually exploited.

"These men took advantage of her vulnerability with no regard for her wellbeing.

"I commend this young girl for her bravery in supporting this case. Even after her ordeal she was able to revisit the sites where she was abused and testify against her abusers in court."

'Nightmare experience'

The girl's parents added: "We are very proud of our daughter for her courage in assisting Greater Manchester Police with the prosecution of these abusers who caused her such terrible harm.

"No family should have to endure a nightmare experience like the one we have been through.

"We support our daughter in hoping that these successful prosecutions will send a message that will help protect other children."

Nine men convicted at Manchester Crown Court in connection with the abuse were:

Aftab Khan, 31, of Tarporley Avenue, Fallowfield pleaded guilty to one count of controlling a child prostitute and one count of sexual activity with a child. He was sentenced to nine years in prison. This was later reduced to seven years on appeal
Abid Khaliq, 30, of Shrewsbury Street, Stretford was sentenced to eight months in prison after admitting perverting the course of justice
Noorzai Ahmed, 29, of Royce Court, Hulme was sentenced to four years in prison after he was found guilty of paying for the sexual services of a child
Mohammed Anwar Safi, 29, of no fixed address, was sentenced to 31 months in prison after admitting paying for the sexual services of a child
Mohammed Khan, 26, of Royce Court, Hulme was sentenced to four years in prison after he was found guilty of facilitating child prostitution
Najibullah Safi, 33, of Reabrook Avenue, West Gorton was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting to sexual activity with a child
Asad Yousaf Hassa, 28, of Rivington Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting two counts of sexual activity with a child
Mohammed Basharat, 28, of Prospect Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after he pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child under 16
Mohammed Atif, 29, of Rivington Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting to sexual activity with a child

President’s “English Are Anti-Semitic” Remarks in Context Concerning Future Demographics

Israeli President’s “English Are Anti-Semitic” Remarks in Context

BNP Newsroom

Israeli president Shimon Peres’s remark that the “English are “anti-Semitic” is highly insulting but is valuable because it starkly reveals the irreconcilable dichotomy of Lib-Lab-Con foreign and domestic policies.

Mr Peres’s comment is not shocking in itself — as Israelis tend to automatically dismiss any criticism of Israel as “anti-Semitism,” which it is not — but his follow-up remark, that the increasing number of Muslim voters in Britain will inevitably have an effect on British politics, is extremely accurate.

Mr Peres, who was awarded an honorary knighthood by the Queen in 2008, said that England's attitude towards Jews was Israel's "next big problem.”

"There are several million Muslim voters, and for many members of parliament, that's the difference between getting elected and not getting elected," he said.

There can be no doubt that the steady swamping of Britain through Third World immigration and Islamification will indeed change the face of this country and its foreign policy forever.

An Islamified Britain and Europe will be disastrous for Israel as the Jewish state’s support base in Europe (and ultimately America) will vanish and be replaced by Third World-dominated regimes which will be highly hostile to Zionism.

Over the long term, this will lead to the cutting off of the massive foreign aid handouts to Israel from the United States of America, upon which the Zionist state depends for its survival.

In that sense, Mr Peres’s remarks are spot on. The Islamification of Britain and the West will be Israel’s “next problem.”

However, Mr Peres’s further comments that “England was deeply pro-Arab ... and anti-Israeli" and “always worked against us [Israel]” are staggeringly incorrect and deeply insulting.

On the contrary, the continuing Middle Eastern wars into which Britain is always dragged are driven primarily by a British subservience to American foreign policy.

American foreign policy was exposed as being completely dominated by the right-wing Zionist lobby in America (which is a coalition of Likud-supporting Zionists and fundamentalist Christian organisations) in the 2007 New York Times bestseller book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, Professor of International Relations at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

As a result, the dichotomy of Lib-Lab-Con policies has emerged: on the one hand, a pro-Israeli foreign policy (ungratefully dismissed by Mr Peres) combined with a domestic policy of encouraging Muslim immigration from nations with whom Israel is in conflict.

Thus Britain finds itself offering sanctuary to massive numbers of Pakistani nationals while that country does not even recognise Israel’s existence and is sworn to destroy it.

Mr Peres’s remarks therefore need to be seen in context: he is correct in pointing out that demographic change here will influence British foreign policy against Israel, but he is most certainly wrong in asserting that current UK foreign policy is “anti-Semitic.” If anything, it is the very opposite.

The British National Party advocates complete neutrality in matters of foreign policy and demands the right to protect our nation from internal Islamic colonisation.

Only in this way can Britain be preserved from the disaster to which our nation is inevitably headed should it continue down the road mapped out by the Lib-Lab-Con liars.

Recommended reading: The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy by John J Mearsheimer and Stephen M Walt. The book describes the lobby as a "loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction." The book "focuses primarily on the lobby's influence on U.S. foreign policy and its negative effect on American interests." The authors also argue that "the lobby's impact has been unintentionally harmful to Israel as well."

The authors argue that although "the boundaries of the Israel lobby cannot be identified precisely," it "has a core consisting of organizations whose declared purpose is to encourage the U.S. government and the American public to provide material aid to Israel and to support its government's policies, as well as influential individuals for whom these goals are also a top priority." 

They note that "not every American with a favourable attitude to Israel is part of the lobby," and that although "the bulk of the lobby is comprised of Jewish Americans," there are many American Jews who are not part of the lobby, and the lobby also includes Christian Zionists. They also claim a drift of important groups in "the lobby" to the right, and overlap with the neoconservatives.

This book is important in helping to understand why Britain is involved in conflicts in the Middle East. P/B 496 pages. Click here to order online.

Reflection on Reverend West's Pal Talk Service

Time To Reflect after Reverend West's Pal Talk Service

Author: John Salvage |  

The Reverend West

This Author was very happy to have found another avenue for the leaders, both politically, and spiritual, of this political party to give us a wider voice, by requesting their presence in the GA Pal Talk room. Had it not been for former Councillor Russell Green, it may have just been a fleeting glance, a swift look in now and again, and nothing more.  However, once on board, it seemed only natural that it be used to engage us all, any time GA and the other hosts allowed, and create a virtual meeting place.

With the latest guest, Reverend West, something stirred within all of us I think, and that is this simple, but forgotten fact: We have a solid Christian past that was steeped in genuine love of our nation, and that God had made such nations with intent and purpose. Reverend West's talk, and short sermon and prayer, allowed us an opportunity to reflect on his words. 

Also, realising what we have already lost, and will continue to lose if we do not pull ourselves together, both as a nation and party soon, it is prudent to offer another wise man's words, to hammer home this basic philosophy of protecting our traditions, architecture, and total way of life.

Ruskin said:

''The greatest glory of a building, is not in its stones, or in its Gold. It's glory is in its age, and in that deep sense of voicefulness of stern watching, of mysterious sympathy, nay, even approval or condemnation which we feel in walls that have long been washed by the passing waves of humanity.
It is in the lasting witness against men, the decline and birth of dynasties and the changing face of earth, and connects forgotten ages with each other. It is the golden stain of time that we are to look for the red light, and colour for the preciousness of its architecture. Not until the building has assumed this character, til it has been entrusted by the deeds and fame of men, till its walls have witnessed suffering, and its pillars rise out of the shadow of death that, its existence is more lasting than natural objects. It can be gifted to posses the very language of life.''

If the above quote has bored you, or you read it out of a kind of sympathy and duty to this Author, and found it unmoving, then the very reason for our potential demise is even more imminent. It is the very fabric of both our ancient Celtic (Keltoi) ancestry, and the architecture, languages and Socio-Cultural meaning of our Christian past that Ruskin was trying to convey. Our children know nothing of the Welsh, Irish, Scots, English (W.I.S.E) tradition of poem and verse. Our last generation of now grown up men and women, are now so limited in Intellectual opportunity that the above quote, would fill them with a face-wide yawn, and unable to read past The greatest glory of a building.


At the the end of the pointless and insane Second World War, and well into the Nineteen Sixties and beyond, a vicious and hateful era of government sponsored vandalism, ran riot up and down the country. Councils were given every encouragement to reform and modernise our towns, cities, and rural inheritance. Both architecture, and social engineering destroyed the fabric of our nation.

Let us please, seriously reflect on what we still have. And that people like our current Chairman, Reverend Robert West, and a whole host of activists and support networks, including without doubt, The Green Arrow and Friends, are well and truly protected, and continue to be loyally invested in.

The very word Reform, used by our enemies from Governments to Institutions, and from Law to recent anti Nick Griffin groups, should spell out an evil link to common sense folk. Reforming anything means changing, bending, and ultimately destroying, our very existence.

Thank God for Reverend West, for if he, a man of Christian philosophy can boldy and bravely support Nationalism, then we have a future for sure.

Join in at Pal Talk Below
 

Yorkshire BNP Area Council Outlines Party Growth Plans

Yorkshire BNP Regional Council Outlines Growth Plans

BNP Newsroom

The British National Party in Yorkshire completed a positive regional council meeting which dealt with expansion plans, a review of election results, the proposed leadership contents and the work of MEP Andrew Brons, regional organiser Chris Beverley reports.

 “All BNP officials and councillors from the Yorkshire and the Humber region were invited to the meeting where a number of important issues were discussed in a free and open manner,” Mr Beverley, who also works as personal assistant to Mr Brons, said.

“It was made clear to everyone that no subject was taboo or ‘out of bounds’ and if people had concerns then it was important that they were raised at this meeting.

“On the subject of the expected leadership election, which will take place assuming the necessary signatures are successfully gathered by a challenger, those in attendance were reminded that they were perfectly entitled to campaign for one or other or indeed none of the candidates involved as long as this was done in a respectful way,” Mr Beverley said.

“People should refrain from personal attacks on their fellow nationalists, even if they happen to disagree with them over certain issues. Civilised and sensible discussion regarding the future direction of the party is to be welcomed and encouraged, whilst personal attacks and the circulation of damaging and groundless allegations which lead to fall-outs and divisions within our party can cause long term harm and only go to aid our enemies, should therefore be avoided at all cost.”

A full and frank debrief relating to the recent general and local election campaigns followed.

“Local organisers were congratulated on their Herculean effort that resulted in 47 out of our 54 constituencies being fought and paid for by our local units. Were other regions to have fought the same percentage of seats then almost 90 percent of the UK’s constituencies would have included BNP candidates,” Mr Beverley said.

“They were also congratulated on fielding so many local candidates across the region, and it was noted that of the only two surviving BNP councillors who were defending their seats this year, one of them was from our region in the form of Cllr Paul Cromie, who was re-elected to represent the Queensbury ward of Bradford Council.

“A number of problems were discussed such as issues surrounding the handling of the centrally produced local and general election leaflets, and steps were identified that could be taken in future to avoid such problems affecting this region.

“It was also pointed out that despite the overall feeling that we did not perform as well in the elections as some people had hoped, our average vote across Yorkshire and the Humber in the general election was 4.4%, which compares very well with the 2.8% of the Establishment safety-valve of UKIP.

“It was also pointed out that the other small parties all did worse than we did in Yorkshire with, for example, the joke ‘English Democrats Party’, a party who got their Mayor elected in Doncaster in 2009 and hoped to win some local seats, failing to win a thing.

“Andrew Brons MEP and I updated those present on the work of Andrew in the European Parliament and the work carried out through his constituency office in Leeds. We outlined the fantastic response we have seen to Andrew’s constituency newsletters, which have been delivered by activists and also by the Royal Mail to homes across the Yorkshire and the Humber constituency by the hundreds of thousand, and what was being done to keep in touch with those who contact us.

“A number of other exciting plans were discussed which have the potential to hugely increase the profile of our MEP and the good work he is doing throughout the region, which would inevitably have a knock-on effect on the popularity of our party as a whole. We will report more on these plans in due course as they begin to be realised,” he continued.

“I reported on a number of new appointments and the setting up of new units, which includes plans for a group to cover the Richmondshire local authority area. Once this group has been set up, this region will for the first time ever have an organisational presence in every local authority, which is a situation I have been working hard to bring about since becoming regional organiser last year.

“All in all the meeting was a very positive one which went to show that Yorkshire’s officials continue to work together in a positive manner to build our organisation and further our electoral progress in this region.”

Chris Beverley’s blog can be found here.

EU Freedom of Movement Rules Cause Romanian Gypsy Crime Wave in Britain

EU’s Freedom of Movement Rules Caused Romanian Gypsy “Crime Wave” in Britain

BNP News

Romanian police were asked by the British authorities to investigate a series of criminal gangs “almost immediately” after Romania’s ascension to the European Union caused a Gypsy “crime wave” in Britain, it has emerged.

News of the massive scale of the Gypsy crime wave became known after a daily newspaper carried a report of a Romanian gypsy gang which had smuggled more than 200 children into Britain to beg, steal and commit petty crimes.

The EU’s “freedom of movement” rules, introduced by the John Major government, allow all EU nationals complete freedom of movement across member state countries.

The Romanian Gypsies — who should not be confused with genuine Romanians who are law-abiding Europeans — are part of an Indian-origin tribe of people who penetrated Eastern Europe in the mists of time.

Romanian nationals have been allowed to settle in Britain since 1 January 2007.

In the first six months of that year, police figures revealed that “Romanian nationals” were responsible for a staggering 1,080 offences.

During the same period in 2006, only 135 such crimes were recorded.

Incredibly, Romanian authorities reported that crime in their country had dropped as the Gypsies exported their activities to Britain.

Stan Bitlan, head of the police force in Ialomita County, Romania, was quoted as saying that there “is a connection between what is happening here and the UK. What they are doing in the UK appears here in Romania in the form of luxury cars and houses.”

The mayor of the town of Tandarei, which was the focus of the most recent Romanain police crackdown, said in 2007 that there had been a drop in crime in his city.

A leaked Home Office memo in 2007 also revealed that an estimated 45,000 potential criminals from Romania and Bulgaria, which also joined the EU at the same time, had entered Britain.

In the latest incident, 26 Gypsies were arrested in Tandarei in connection with the child gangs.

The arrested men face charges of trafficking children, money laundering, membership of an organised crime group and possession of illegal firearms.

According to reports, the children were kept under the control of a gang member in Britain and were used to “earn” money by begging, washing windscreens, pick pocketing and shoplifting.

roma-numbers

National Lottery Fund Blacks-Only Schools

National Lottery Funds Apartheid Blacks-Only Schools

BNP Newsroom

The National Lottery funds an organisation which is actively involved in co-ordinating Apartheid-style blacks-only schools in Britain, a BNP News investigation has revealed.

The National Association of Black Supplementary Schools (NABSS), which has been set up specifically to support schools from which whites are excluded, boasts of the lottery grant funding on its main website.

In addition, the NABSS will this coming week be holding a conference in Tottenham, North London, on the topic of “National Black Supplementary School Week” which will be a jamboree of speakers who will blame whites for their community’s academic failures.

According to a press release issued by the NABSS, the conference will deal “head on with statistics about the underachievement of black children by challenging terms such as ‘disproportional representation,’ ‘institutional racism,’ ‘failing,’ ‘stereotyping’" and other terms synonymous with young people of African descent.”

There will also be a “series of workshops and events that will specifically look at issues pertaining to education of black children, and black supplementary schools and the role of black parents,” the NABSS statement continued.

The lottery-funding of the blacks-only organisation and schools takes on an even sinister meaning when the “resources” listed on the NABSS website are investigated.

Amongst the resources available is a video which attempts to explain why black children prefer playing with white dolls as opposed to those of their own colour.

The video (of course) blames white people for this phenomen, and quotes radical black American Muslim Malcom X’s speech where he declared that white people had taught black people to hate themselves.

“Who taught you to hate the texture of your hair?” the video shows Mr X saying. “Who taught you to hate the colour of your skin, to such extent that you bleach to get like the white man?

“Who taught you to hate the shape of your nose, and the shape of your lips? Who taught you to hate yourself, from the top of your head to the soles of your feet?

“Who taught you to hate your own kind—who taught you to hate the race that you belong to, so much so that you don’t wanna be around each other?

“No, before you come around asking Mr. Muhammed does he teach hate, you should ask yourself: who taught you to hate being what God gave you?”

The fact that the NABSS even uses Malcolm X as a role model is equally bizarre. He was born as born Malcolm Little and after his conversion to Islam he called himself El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.

Malcolm X was sentenced to prison in 1946 for a series of violent crimes in Boston and New York and converted to Islam while in prison.

After his release, he changed his surname to “X” because, as he said in his autobiography, "[F]or me, my 'X' replaced the white slavemaster name of 'Little' which some blue-eyed devil named Little had imposed upon my paternal forebears."

He then became leader of the militant black supremacist Nation of Islam organisation which taught that black people were the original people of the world and that “white people were a race of devils.”

* It is about time that someone tested the liberal mindset at the Lottery funds distribution centre and applied for money to set up ‘whites-only’ schools.

The wails of “racism” would come even quicker than the funding for blacks-only schools.

As readers of this website know, there is one law for white British people and another for everyone else. The Lottery funding of the NABSS proves this once again.

postscript from Horwich Nationalists, just do'nt sit back and let this kind of thing continue, join the British National Party by clicking this link BNP Membership application 

 

Welsh Police Refuse to Reveal Details of Illegal Immigration Scam

Powys Police Refuse to Reveal Details of Illegal Immigration Scam

BNP Newsroom

The South Wales British National Party team of super activists have produced yet another powerful video which has revealed Powys police collusion in covering up an illegal immigration swindle because it would “harm commercial interests.”

The video, produced by Roger Phillips and his team of the “colonisation of Wembley” YouTube fame, was made after Freedom of Information (FoI) Act inquiries following a series of UK Border Agency raids on a Muslim-owned takeaway.

The raids took place after the restaurant in question had been caught at least twice employing illegal immigrants as waiters.

The FoI request provoked a response from Powys police in which they refused to supply any details because it would “hurt the commercial interests” of the shop owner.

Mr Phillips also reveals how the business owner has since allegedly fled the country although the takeaway is still run by his family.