Horwich Nationalists BNP Supporters Group: Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year

Horwich Nationalists BNP Supporters Group: Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year

Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year

Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year

Looking at the latest figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS), immigration for last year alone has now reached half a million. So much for Labour’s electioneering-inspired claim that it is being reduced.
The point is that we must not let the people forget that former Labour adviser Andrew Leather has revealed what the BNP always suspected. The Labour Government in 2001 decided to purposely open up Britain’s borders as a “driving political purpose”.
That purpose, he admitted, was that mass immigration was the way the Government was going to make Britain “truly multicultural”. The grateful immigrants would also vote overwhelmingly for Labour, thus keeping them in power.
Neither must we forget that at this election the “multiracial Tory Party” is only committed to “bringing in more controls over immigration”, The Lib Dems seem happy with the status quo.
UKIP has supported a view put forward by some individual Tories that we should allow into the country the same number of people that depart these shores. With complete disregard for the higher birth rate among the immigrant population – and Muslims in particular – this still means that the indigenous Britons will become a minority within 30 years.
However, back to the latest immigration figures. The ONS figures show that in 2009 203,865 people were granted British citizenship, which was 58 per cent more than the previous year.
Additionally, more than 190,000 were given the right to settle.
Also, the non-EU “student” visa numbers again increased to a total of 250,000. It has been widely reported in the media, including by David Metcalf, chairman of the Migration Advisory Committee, that the student visa system is frequently abused, with up to 600 lower tier colleges either offering “Mickey Mouse” degrees or none at all. Apart from the one in eight “students” who were completely bogus, the Government has allowed those who have gained their degrees to stay on in employment.
Labour has repeatedly told us that many East European workers are now going home. An investigative report by Tom Whitehead in the Daily Telegraph (17/02/10) said, however, that officials in some towns and cities insist migrants are still arriving. This is certainly the case in Boston, Lincs, Peterborough and Slough, which have all seen a large recent influx of migrants.
Officials in Boston claim there are 75,000 people living in the town, compared with an official estimate of 62,000; Peterborough’s officials say they have 184,000 people, not 164,000; and officials in Slough claim it has up to 140,000 people, rather than the official 124,000.
Carol Clare, head of Boston’s Park Community primary school, said about half her pupils were from overseas and this would rise to 60 per cent.
Reprinted from the spring edition of the BNP’s Identity magazine – free to all Party members. 

Climate Change and Mental Health in Nottingham

Climate Change and Mental Health in Nottingham

May 4, 2010 - By mercia

A newspaper advertisement for a “climate change manager” for Nottingham City Council has once again illustrated just how dearly this fad costs the hard-pressed British taxpayer.

Exactly why Nottingham City Council regards the acquisition of a “climate change manager” as a must — and a very expensive must at that — when all the evidence shows that climate change has been occurring for as long as planet earth has been in existence, is not explained.

Furthermore, observers have asked is there something about the climate in the city of Nottingham and its environs that sets it aside from that embracing the remainder of the country.

If Nottingham Civic Centre’s water supply still utilises the city’s original system of Victorian lead pipes, then that could explain a lot.

Either way a recent advertisement placed in the Guardian for a “climate change manager”, at a salary of up to £39,855 per annum, does suggest that there are some at the Labour controlled town hall in dire need of a mental assessment, in a city increasingly blighted by poverty and unemployment.

A British National Party administration would no more be seeking to employ a “climate change manager” than an alchemist with a remit to turn base metal into gold.

Instead, a BNP administration would spend council taxpayers’ money on real services that benefit the whole community — with the funding of a mental health manager’s post being a distinct possibility.

British National Party Website read more 

The GreeningThe Greening the Environmentalists Drive for Global Power, 

Welcome to the United Kingdom of Pakistan

Welcome to the United Kingdom of Pakistan
Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 14:38 Author: rugfish

Pop Up Embed Embed this video on your site

Cameron appears to think all Muslims are like the cosy couple he spent 2 days with when he became the Tory scapegoat for the next parliament.

He apparently feels his ability to control Islam in the UK amounts to the easier task of controlling the British people with laws of 'hate crimes', and antagonising speeches like the last couple he's made where he's referred to British people who fundamentally disagree with his mental attitude that they are all despicable racists and fascists simply because they happen not to want their country to become another Islamic state like the shit holes he wants to take more voters from.

Apparently Cameron is so far up his own arse, he feels with a 2 seat majority gained from a fraudulent ballot in a fake general election, that this will give him the moral authority and power to dictate our way of thinking, along with blocking the rights to protest of millions of people who see the hostility toward us in our own country by his ethnic Tories, is outweighed only by the hostility shown by the likes of Cameron and his UAF hammer throwing UAF kooks, who together are behaving like Marxists rather than Conservatives with an aim for a 'Big Society' which excludes the British people but only if they happen to be white Christians.

He obviously thinks that HIS way of thinking is right, and that anyone who doesn't want to be raped or murdered with a machete, endure darts, hammers or bricks as they would in any other Islamic country if coming up against the mad ideological mass hysteria of Islam, or not wanting their kids to be brainwashed by Marxists that a paedophile prophet who wanted his followers to conquer the earth by sword, simply because he said so, is wrong.

Article
Thursday, April 15, 2010
By Murtaza Ali Shah LONDON:
Pakistan and Afghanistan will be the single-most important foreign policy commitment of an incoming Conservative government, says David Cameron, who is leading the 6th May election race in Britain with almost 8 points lead.
In an exclusive interview, the Tory leader said if he forms the government in a months time, Pakistan will find a strong partner committed to the beleaguered nations stability and prosperity.
David Cameron told The News that once in power, the Tories will continue to assist the Government of Pakistan in education, healthcare and employment, particularly in areas that have been affected by the recent campaign against insurgents.
After he became the Conservative Leader, Cameron spent two days with a British-Pakistani Muslim family, the Rehmans, in Birmingham. He says the experience strengthened his conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain.
Cameron promises that he will take concrete measures to promote integration of various communities in the mainstream and it will not be one of those tactics already applied by the Labour. He will start by tackling the poison of racism and bigotry.
“The truth is that your skin colour still unjustly affects the patterns of your life ñ from whether you are born in poverty to how you do at school; from being a victim of crime to not getting a job. Itís wrong and it needs to change.”
Promoting community interaction and bringing people together is a must and he has proposed to create a National Citizen Service programme for 16-year olds to give them a chance to mix with people from different backgrounds.
He promises that if his party wins the election on 6th may, he will review all counter-terrorism legislation to make sure there is the right balance between security and our civil liberties.
“Under Tories, there will be more Muslim men and women at the top of Britainís businesses. It means more Muslim soldiers in the highest levels of command in our Army. It means getting many, many more Muslims into our Parliament.”
He held up Pakistani-origin boxer Amir Khan and business mogul Sir Anwar Pervez as the role models who inspire everyone. “If I become prime minister, I am determined to help and encourage and promote more role models so that together we can build a country open to the talents of everyone. ” Muslims in Britain have been under attack in many forms since the 9/11 and 7/7 tragedies.
Far-right groups, British National Party, National Front and a new group English Defence League (EDF) have made the Muslims target of their hate campaign.
Cameron says the standoffs between Muslim communities and the EDF are “extremely worrying”. He promises that he will sort out these problems by changing the way the communities are policed, with more community beat meetings, less paperwork, and much more time for police to spend on patrol and dealing with hate crimes.
David Cameron said that he will not support a ban on the Burqa, as suggested by some of his party leaders. When reminded that his party had opposed legislation intended to outlaw incitement to religious hatred, Cameron said he opposed the law just because he thought it will curtail free speech and went too far.
END
As I said yesterday, David Cameron has a big mouth but he's also proven to be an idiot.
What will Christians, Sikhs and Jews think of his policy toward making Britain into an Islamic state?
I guess if or when he becomes Britain's next dictator, then he might want to pass a law just for us who will want to keep our sovereign right to rule this land which is ours, and will undoubtedly still continue to call him a big mouthed idiot until he takes measures against us.
Whilst he's at it, he may like to ask them to build some gallows and we'll see who make it there first, unless of course he has plans to order armed police on to the streets or invoke the Civil Contingencies Act against the British people whilst he sits having tea with his new Muslim family from Pakistan who he'll undoubtedly be asking to vote for Dave the Dhimmi of the New United Kingdom of Pakistan if he gets half a chance.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
As I said yesterday, David Cameron has a big mouth but he's also proven to be an idiot.
What will Christians, Sikhs and Jews think of his policy toward making Britain into an Islamic state?
I guess if or when he becomes Britain's next dictator, then he might want to pass a law just for us who will want to keep our sovereign right to rule this land which is ours, and will undoubtedly still continue to call him a big mouthed idiot until he takes measures against us.
Whilst he's at it, he may like to ask them to build some gallows and we'll see who make it there first, unless of course he has plans to order armed police on to the streets or invoke the Civil Contingencies Act against the British people whilst he sits having tea with his new Muslim family from Pakistan who he'll undoubtedly be asking to vote for Dave the Dhimmi of the New United Kingdom of Pakistan if he gets half a chance.

Letter of Rebuke send to Establishment Parties from Brave Bognor Civic Society

Letter of Rebuke send to Establishment Parties

Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 08:39 Author: Green Arrow |  

I think we will all agree, that it was pretty disgusting and undemocratic of organisations across the country,that arranged political hustings in order for voting members of the public to meet the candidates in their areas, to exclude British National Party candidates.

It was also pretty disgusting of those organisations that did invite the British National Party to take part, to withdraw those invites when petulant bully boy candidates from the Tri-Axis of Evil parties spat their dummies out and said they would not attend if the BNP were to take part in the democratic process of giving the voters the chance to question their polices.  Shame on those cowardly organiser who caved in to The Establishment and helped silence the voice of freedom.

But even more shame should be put upon the shoulders of those candidates who said that they had no objections in sharing a platform with the BNP but still attended the hustings from which the BNP were excluded.  By their appearance at these sham political debates they supported those silencers of free speech.  They should have stayed away.

And if shame should be heaped on the above then credit should go to those organisations who, when informed by the rats of the Establishment candidates that they would not attend if the BNP were to be invited did not cave in to the Establishment candidate threats but went ahead and held their hustings with empty seats to represent the absent candidates.

Those candidates who spat in the face of democracy and the faces of the people they are standing for election to represent by not sharing a platform with the BNP should be advised that the public's memory is not as short as they think and their actions will come back to haunt them.

They will be haunted by organisations like the Bognor Regis Civic Society, that has its dander up over a Public Meeting they organised to allow the public to see and question the election candidates in their area and are rightly annoyed that Lib/Lab/con candidates all chickened out of attending at the last moment in "protest" at the BNP exercising their candidates democratic rights to give the people in that constituency a chance to question them on BNP policies.

All the 6 election candidates were contacted well in advance and all 6 agreed to attend.  They were Nick Gibb (Cons), Michael Jones (Lab), Simon McDougall (Lib-Dem), Douglas Denny (UKIP), Melissa Briggs (CLIP) and Andrew Moffat (BNP).  All 6 knew that all the others had been invited, and the Labour and Lib-Dem candidates asked if the BNP candidate would be attending.  They were told that he had been invited and probably would attend.  No candidate said that if the BNP were to attend they would not.

Late on Friday evening the Society’s Deputy Chairman was telephoned by Jan Cosgrove, agent for the Labour Candidate, and treated to an hour long harangue ranging from his view of the BNP to the Holocaust and the history of the Weimar Republic. All this was designed to bully us into excluding the BNP candidate. It was explained to him that we are non-political and have to be even-handed and accept all 6 candidates, regardless of his (or our) personal views. He threatened to withdraw his candidate from the meeting and was told that would have to be his own decision.

Well done to Bognor Regis Civic Society on posting the truth but true to their word, they did not let it drop there and have now sent a Letter of Rebuke to the cowardly candidates of the Lib/Lab/con alliance that I publish in fall below:-

2nd May, 2010.

Michael Jones,
x xxxx xxxx,
Southgate,
Crawley,
West Sussex.
RH10 xxx
(Also sent to Nick Gibb and Simon McDougall)

Dear Mr. Jones,

Re: Election Meeting, Alexandra Theatre, Saturday 24th April 2010
The intention at our recently held pre-election meeting was to allow the public to question all six parliamentary candidates of the Bognor Regis and Littlehampton constituency on local issues affected by government policy as well as hearing debate on these issues between the candidates themselves.

You will recall that you agreed to attend this meeting and that you were well aware that all six candidates were to be invited.  You will also recall that you asked if the BNP would be attending and were told that they probably would, but at no point initially did you indicate that if the BNP candidate attended, you would not.

It is now a matter of record that on the day of the meeting you withdrew and failed to attend, thus depriving the public of their opportunity to question you and hear debate between you and the other five candidates.

Some 270 people attended the meeting, and they were informed of the reason  for your non-attendance before the debate went ahead with the three candidates that agreed to attend.   During this debate there were a number of expressions of disapproval of the candidates that had failed to show up from the audience.  This was followed by a proposal from the floor that a “letter of rebuke” should be sent to the three absent candidates, which was voted on by a show of hands and resulted in an overwhelming vote in favour, with only seven votes against.

Accordingly, you may therefore consider this to be the letter of rebuke from a large body of the public who considered your non-attendance at the meeting, and your reasons for this, to be unacceptable.

In addition you may consider this to be a letter of rebuke from ourselves.  We went to an immense amount of trouble and expense to put on this meeting, not only for the public but also for yourselves to be able to communicate directly with them. We are a voluntary organisation who take particular care not to involve ourselves in political bias but, equally, in a democracy, we attach the highest importance to providing a platform for freedom of speech.   One would have thought that you would consider yourselves fortunate that an organisation such as ours exists in the town to take the trouble to involve ourselves in such matters.

We and our audience therefore find it wholly unacceptable for you to initially lead us to believe that you would take part, in full knowledge of who would be attending and without any mention that if any particular candidate attended you would not.  To withdraw in this manner at all is not remotely in the interests of free speech and open debate; to leave it until the very day of the meeting cannot be considered in any other way than as treating your potential audience and us with total disregard.

Furthermore, we found the suggestion from some of you non participating candidates that we could resolve the matter by excluding one of the candidates as being quite remarkable and completely unacceptable. Not only would this have compromised our position of strict political impartiality but it would have compromised the principle of freedom of speech which is the bedrock of democracy and which this country, as the Mother of all Parliaments, has gone to war to defend.

It is scarcely surprising that the audience took such exception to your actions, some of them voicing their view that you do not deserve their vote.
Whatever the outcome of the election, from our perception of our audience’s responses, there will be many in Bognor Regis who will not forget this lightly.  We can confidently predict that, had we asked them, our audience would have overwhelmingly supported our view that you should attempt to ameliorate this situation by holding a further meeting with all six candidates present, rather than the one with just yourselves that you have planned.  In this way the democratic rights of Bognor Regis electors to simultaneously hear the views and witness the debate of all their six candidates will be upheld.

Freedom of speech and informed debate is not remotely served by two separate groups of candidates addressing different questions at different meetings with no possibility of interplay between them.
Yours sincerely

Hugh Coster
Deputy Chairman.

Well done Hugh Coster and well done Bognor Regis Civic Society.  Pity you are non political.  People who believe in Freedom of Speech are always welcome in the patriotic British National Party.

Burnley Muslim Mens terror Spree

Terror raid on sisters' home

May 03, 2010

A terrified woman woke to see an armed gang in her room after they had broken into her home in the early hours of the morning.
Burnley Crown Court heard how during the horrifying raid at a house in Accrington shared by two sisters, Abaduat Ali, 26, Khalid Hussain, 24 and Khizer Abbas, 27, trashed rooms and laughed at their victims as they cowered in fear. The gang even bludgeoned a baby rabbit to death.
One of the women had woken to find the men in her room and Abbas shaking her bed and one was groped by hammer-wielding Hussain.
They continued to frighten the women, both under the age of 23, but seemed to think it was funny and were ‘laughing their heads off’.
All three men have been jailed for two years.
The victims were so traumatised by their ordeal they had moved out and gone back to live with family.
Abbas, of Whalley New Road, Blackburn, admitted burglary. Hussain, of Ormerod Street and Ali, of Nelson Street, both Accrington, pleaded guilty to affray.
Sentencing, Judge Beverley Lunt told them: “This was a home invasion by the three of you of the most horrifying kind.”
The judge, who said the attack on the rabbit was ‘savage indeed’ added the incident warranted much longer than three years behind bars but the maximum for affray was three years and she had to give “credit” for owning up.
She continued: “If the prosecution had chosen to pursue burglary charges against each of you, you would have been facing four or five years in jail.”
David Temkin, prosecuting, said sticks from the house were used to smash the rabbit hutch and one of the animals was hit over the head. It died later that day.
Ali and Abbas were arrested 100 yards away and Hussain asked officers for a lift home when he was seen on a street by police at 1.45am.
When questioned, Hussain said they had got the wrong house.
For Hussain, Neil Fryman said he would lose his house if sent to custody. He was no stranger to the courts.
Louise Kitchin, defending Ali, said he was ashamed because he knew what he did was appalling and unacceptable. His wife did not allow him to have alcohol at home and he would binge drink at a friend’s house.
Representing Abbas, Craig Earnshaw told the court: “He accepts the householders would without doubt have been very frightened.”

BNP elderly activists attacked in Islington

BNP elderly activists attacked in Islington

Posted on May 4th, 2010 by Carlos Cortiglia

It happened today when a group of left-wing vandals, possibly high on alcohol and drugs, attacked a group of BNP activists campaigning in Islington. Among the BNP members attacked, was an 87-year-old in a wheelchair and a 67-year-old.
The attackers, mostly in their mid-twenties, proceeded to destroy campaigning materials and beat BNP activists. Had it not been for the actions of some stall owners, the ferocity of the attack would have produced fatalities.
The late arrival of police officers did little to reassure the public when faced with an incident that was orchestrated from the very beginning, since some of the attackers have been clearly identified as those involved in previous attacks in the area of Swiss Cottage.
This happens at a time when there have been violent attacks against journalists investigating several cases of electoral fraud. More than 50 cases in at least 12 London local authorities are being investigated by the Metropolitan Police and this includes revelations made by a Prospective Labour Candidate who spoke about postal ballot results indicating how many have been cast for specific political parties.
Tonight, none other than George Galloway MP, denounced the existence of vote rigging in Tower Hamlets, a borough that is already under investigation for electoral fraud with denonciations about the registration of ghost voters.
Violence against political parties and journalists and all kinds of electoral fraud perpetrated by people who are trying to win the election by whichever means are degrading British democracy.
All this in the context of a political party – the Labour Party - that is even campaigning against its own candidates and offering tactical voting. Such is the fear of some of the Labour Mandarins that they are ready and willing to sell their own people to keep themselves in power

Ex-Unite Against Fascism UAF Thug Speaks Out

Ex-Unite Against Fascism UAF Thug Speaks Out 

Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 13:44 Author: Vortex |  

Why I Turned My back on the UAF
Labour Supporting Thugs Exposed
SUNDAY TAT
2 May 2010
By A. Hack

A brave young whistle-blower has revealed the sickening and hate filled world of the violent Unite Against Fascism group and their links with the Labour Party.

Young Terry Smith (we have disguised his real name for fears of reprisals), was an eager supporter and activist with the group for three years but became appalled with their vile anti-British racism and violent antics and decided to reveal the truth about the organization.

HATE
“The UAF says it is about stopping the BNP, and opposing those who oppose mass immigration, but in private they talk about beating opponents up and laughed when they heard a BNP leafleter had been attacked and hospitalised”, Terry told me.

He went on, “They’ve discarded the Che Guevara T shirts and the communist badges and now wear casual clothes, but they are still the same old violent communist thugs beneath their modernised image. I heard two UAF activists talking about the good old days in the USSR when opponents were sent to the gulags and worked to death. ‘That’ll teach enemies of the working class they chortled’”.

Terry eyed some UAF activists who appeared across the road nervously and drew heavily on his cigarette. “I’m very scared, they’ve got links with violent anarchists and they know about me now. I am also worried about my family who have received death threats and threatening phone calls” he continued.

THUGGERY
The UAF pretends it is a broad based group but is controlled and run by the extremist Socialist Workers Party and their leading officials Weyman Bennett and Martin Smith. “They hate Britain and patriotism and want to see Western Europe destroyed", Terry continued, "Their foot soldiers are hardened street thugs who think nothing of attacking their opponents with claw hammers, even elderly people who they disagree with.

I couldn’t stand it any more and decided to speak out. The Labour Party actively encourage and support them and this needed to be exposed, I have seen well known Labour Party members plan activities with senior UAF organizers who joke about their sickening attacks when drunk . I implore people to vote for anyone, anyone but the Labour Party in the General Election”.

BRUTALITY
A spokesman for the anti-communist magazine Spotlight which combats anti-British hatred said, “Terry’s story is not an unusual one. We have many similar accounts on our files exposing the UAF for the brutal street thugs that they are. We have sent out dossier to the police, which include the names of a number of Labour Party activists as well.”

NEW LIFE
Meanwhile Terry and his family have left the area and are starting a new life away from the vile and evil UAF. “I am glad to have seen the light, and now want to just get on with my life like any normal person wishes to”.

NEXT WEEK: HOW UAF THUGS PLANNED TO BREAK UP A LAWFUL ELECTION MEETING ATTENDED BY ELDERLY WORLD WAR 2  VETERANS AT  http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/ 

No Fairness Honour or Decency remaining in Britain

No Fairness Honour or Decency remaining in Britain

Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 08:39 Author: rugfish |  

Postal vote fraud: 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid fears bogus voters could swing election.
There were many events which happened in Britain prior to me seeing that headline of course, which brought us to become a shamed nation where once we stood so proud.
Just as our once mighty and invincible ancestors, the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish watched Britain slide down the long slope from being a global superpower, with military, economic, industrial and foreign powers covering half the globe. We are today seeing further decline where we are stripped of all political right to argue, as we stand as helpless witnesses to the dawning of a new era where our only remaining strength of ability to protest is the ability to say in whispers that it isn't fair.
As politicians have gathered pace toward a general election in what is likely to be the most crucial period of our history. Where the British people appear to be at odds to decide who to pick to lead the country out of the mess created by mainstream political parties. It seems the last remaining strength they offer the British people is a choice between who will be more 'fair' in their policies to cut the budget, and who will give more powers to immigrants.
They have gone too far.
No longer can British politicians shape the world or bring the benefits of fairness to others, and nor can they bring it to their own people. They have gone too far to turn back, and they have turned their backs on the British people.
No longer can British politicians send democracy around the world to empower other nations, no longer can they protect our own, and no longer can the British people deliver change to their own country in a system which is intentionally meant to stop us.
Rather than the above headline, which evidences that our political system has been usurped from under us, being reason to stand up in protest, it is veiled by pictures of television stars coupled with an inherent belief amongst Britons, that those in power have the ability to prevent it rather than that they themselves have the collective intentional desire to have engineered it.
Politicians will blame a lack of anything other than their own lack of diligence to the same British standards of fairness, honesty and decency which once marked us out as a people from New York to Calcutta.
These same politicians are responsible for having tied Britannia's hands behind her back as they have all been complicit in removing our country's sovereign powers as well as the sovereign rights of our people as they set about fleecing us, taxing us and sending us off to their wars.
Now they talk about 'fairness'.
With their ideological belief that things would be 'fairer' if the British people's inherent fairness was replaced by a third world populace who are openly defiant themselves of the inherent traits already possessed by the British people of fair play, honor and decency, politicians have set about creating a third world shit hole where beliefs inherent to ordinary people are now manifestly in need of teaching.
Instead of building a growing society of people who share the same values, politicians have deliberately coaxed the inflow of people from cultures that are clearly alien to our own, whilst simultaneously demanding that we tolerate them no matter what upset they cause.
Despite, this intentional mixing of culture has led to gross and abhorrent crimes being committed against our people which previously were unheard of except in most rare circumstances, politicians have deliberately set about to create a melting pot society of extreme cultural differences, which are not only at odds with one another but have indeed hastened our slide as a people into third world status, even to the point where we will exist no more.
Instead of seeking a democratic way forward in a country which was once the ultimate giver of freedom to others, politicians have instead ordained that the plans they placed upon us without asking, politicians have disengaged from indigenous people and they have removed and stamped on our ability to complain.
Instead of following the inherent traits of the British people once in places of power, politicians have used the same tactics of Karl Marx, Joseph Goebbels and Adolph Hitler in a crusade to alter our society, beyond all recognition, to propagandize against us when we complain, and to shape the minds of the indigenous people of Britain into believing that their own economic slavery whilst they make laws to discriminate against us, is 'fair'.
Peaceful roof top protesters in Dudley yesterday, protesting at the building of yet another mosque, were met by armed police whilst gangs of knife and machete wielding Muslims were left alone to get on with it. Rather than taking action against the threat they disposed of the threatened and in so doing they not only broke the fundamental rules of law and order to keep the peace and to remove threats to society of machete wielding thugs, but they also sent a message that the virtues of tolerance and right to peaceful protest has visibly been taken from us as a people.
Police blamed a lack of resources to deal with the actual threat, so their ultimate action was to remove the threatened victims with armed police.
An Englishman was recently prosecuted for having a camping knife in his glove box, which he used to cut fruit, when at the same time the police take no action against a gang of machete wielding third world thugs bent of murder and mayhem, and this is only one of many instances where the force of the establishment has been aimed only one way against 'us'.
The British National Party makes a case for real political change which would restore sanity and commonsense to British politics in a country which was once proud of our inherent qualities of fairness, honesty and decency.
These common values did not need to be played on or made more than what they are already as a result of a thousand years of inherited beliefs but have since been exulted as an essential requirement by the same political bastards who destroyed them and by the same mindless, and selfish politicians who are clearly incapable of practicing the very virtues they preach to us but not to the third world people they brought amongst us.
As they launch political crusades to empower 'black votes', Muslim Councils, black police, and an ethnically diverse Britain in which the indigenous people are made second class citizens without reference to their inherited status, but are rather earmarked themselves as 'Fascists and Racists' by the very people who seek the destruction of Britannia and its people. They might want to take note of the ability no matter how unlikely, of the British people themselves to restore this country to themselves once more, and the longer they put it off, the more they try to eradicate our abilities to protest, and the more laws they bring out to make us second class citizens, then the more virulent will be their ultimate end.
The ballot box must be restored to those who want Britain to remain Britain, and it must be removed from the criminals who call themselves our representatives if the British people are to restore their country to one of fair play, tolerance and decency where voices are heard by the people rather than silenced by a complicit media and by political traitors whose only aim is to retain power over us so they can carry on with their deliberate destruction of all things Britain was once renowned the world over as they sell their destructive plans under the guise of 'fairness'.
And only by acting in league with the British people and with those who support the basic aims of fairness, honour and decency, can these aims be accomplished peacefully, for whatever reason, it seems that those in the one party system which brought about our demise, are deliberately laying the constructs to provoke civil uprising and are fermenting the fires of civil war which will eventually engulf them and many innocent people unless they begin to tackle the real political questions as opposed to preaching 'fairness' to all except to the indigenous people of Britain.
Without which, there will be no fairness, honour or decency remaining in Britain, for we will in fact become a Third World Country under Islamic rule unless it is reversed.
rugfish

Independents Reporter Jerome Taylor Beaten By Asian Thugs while exposing vote fraud

Independents Reporter Jerome Taylor Beaten By Asian Thugs while exposing vote fraud

 

Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 16:21 Author: john of gwent

Go read the details here and fume.

Jerome Taylor, journalist for "The Independent" went to see one of the candidates standing in the Tower Hamlets area for the General Election. Alone. When he foolishly told a few Asian youths why he was there, they and several more of their mates beat him to the ground with whatever weapons they could get their hands on.
The fact he survived to be tended by the paramedics (who normally refuse to venture into this area without a police escort) is due entirely to a local have a go here who came out and fought these thugs off until they ran, some running directly into the house of the candidate he sought to question over these fraud allegations.
If ever there was a reason to abandon the election in this rotten borough and hold it on another day only after every voter's eligibility has been validated by electoral officials going door to door protected by armed response police officers, this is it.

Comment by Horwich  Nationalists,
Welcome to the world of reality all you Left wing apologist Journalists , for years you have dug your heads in the sand , believing the clap trap of Multi culturism were every one will skip merrily of into the sunset, how WRONG HAVE YOU BEEN!
we had a peaceful and fair land and it has been turned into a land of thugs who use corruption & violence to achieve their political agenda with the help of illiterate violent ethnic minorities who,s lives are governed by superstition and bigotry, who will defend your so called liberal principles from these thugs , WHY! In the political sphere, the people who for years you have pilloried and vilified,
THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY!
Plus one must add who will protect us all from the NU Labour Militias that has invaded us , as Brown and his Nu Labour Perverts have our brave forces thousands of miles away fighting in a illegal and unjust war!
Now I say to all you so called Liberals seek the truth , it will open your eyes, and then you will see things as they really are! You have a choice on May the 6th make sure it is the right one to protect yourself in the future!

Join the British Resistance

British National Party E-News

Join the British Resistance Dear Fellow Patriot, With only two days to go until the General and Local elections, it is time we reflected on the terrible future that awaits our country, our children and grand-children. If the politicians and the media have their way, our country will be totally overrun by the masses of the Third-World, we will be ruled from Brussels, we will be a despised, second-class minority in our own homeland. Is that the future you want for your children? Will you regret it when it is too late and you wished you would have joined the British Resistance when you had the chance? The British National Party is Britain's fastest growing political party, with over 100 councillors, a seat on the Greater London Assembly and two seats in the European Parliament. On Thursday we could win control of our first council and could win seats at Westminster. The clock is ticking, our country is dying, and our beautiful innocent children are depending on us to save their future. Here is the different membership options: METHOD #1: Join the British Resistance The BNP is the only hope for our country, for our children and grand-children. There are thousands of people receiving this e-bulletin that are not members yet. Why not join the British Resistance to political correctness, multiculturalism and the enforced colonisation of our country. Standard membership costs only £30: http://secure.bnp.org.uk/join/ METHOD #2: Become a Life Member Life members are that small elite of British patriots that sign-up to the Cause of British Nationalism for life, not just for one year. Life membership comes with various other attractive benefits: http://secure.bnp.org.uk/life/ METHOD #3: Become a Gold Member Gold members stand out from the crowd due to the unique gold membership badge that all Gold members wear with pride. Gold membership costs just £60 and shows that little bit of extra commitment to the Cause of British survival: http://secure.bnp.org.uk/gold/ METHOD #4: Upgrade your membership For the thousands of existing BNP members out there why not upgrade your membership to Gold or even Life? Upgrading your membership shows your commitment to our Cause and provides real and substantial benefits to you and the Party: http://secure.bnp.org.uk/upgrades/ METHOD #5: Join the Trafalgar Club The Trafalgar Club is the BNP's exclusive dining and fundraising club. Members of the TC are not Party members, so it is a perfect option for those supporters that wish to help without actually joining the Party: http://secure.bnp.org.uk/trafalgarclub/ Yours sincerely, Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party

> Forward to a friend

Add newsletter@bnp.org.uk to your address book British National Party 2009. PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP

Asian Postal Vote fraud to Swing UK Election

Massive Postal vote Fraud could Swing The Labour Party Votes to higher than they should be, No wonder the Nu labour party wants mass Immigration & to destroy the British People they want to turn this wonderful nation into a third world Islamic Banana republic were corruption is the normal way of life, for Goodness sake on May The 6th get out and vote for the BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY they are the only party that will save our nation from this multi cultural hell hole that all the three main parties want to impose on us just for the sake of their own pursuit of power for powers sake alone! 

from Daily Mail ,

Voter fraud could determine the outcome of the general election as evidence emerges of massive postal vote rigging.
Police have launched 50 criminal inquiries nationwide amid widespread cases of electoral rolls being packed with ‘bogus’ voters.
Officials report a flood of postal vote applications in marginal seats. With the outcome of the closest election in a generation hanging in the balance, a few thousand ‘stolen’ votes there could determine who wins the keys to Downing Street.

 Please Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html#ixzz0mxWQbxd5

The Labour Party Get A taste of Their Own Dirty Tricks Agenda

May 3, 2010 - By BNP News

The Labour Party, which has long used a number of third party front organisations to attack the British National Party in a blatant disregard of the democratic process, has been hit by its own tactics with the distribution of a 12-page magazine in Barking devoted to exposing sitting MP Margaret Hodge.

The magazine, called the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel, is a full colour publication which details sex, cash and personality scandals which reveal the MP as unfit to hold office.

“The BNP has long been the victim of these third party campaigns and it seems that the Labour Party is getting some of its own medicine back,” said BNP leader Nick Griffin, who is fighting Ms Hodge’s seat.

“This magazine has been produced by a loose coalition of non-BNP people,” Mr Griffin said.

The magazine, currently being distributed in the Barking constituency, discusses how Ms Hodge was a “loony leftist” who, during her tenure as council leader in 1982, flew the red flag over the town hall and had a bust of Lenin on her desk.

In addition, the magazine says, she ignored repeated requests from social workers to do something about the sexual abuse of children in Islington Council Care.

The magazine also details Ms Hodge’s parliamentary expenses claims. The MP, who is the richest woman in Parliament with a £50 million personal fortune, claimed for organic coffee and biscuits — and even a 25 pence carrier bag — from the taxpayers as part of her expenses.

The entire document makes riveting reading and can be downloaded from the Internet by clicking here.

Facebook Dirty Tricks By Our Opponents Sinks To A Even Newer Low

May 4, 2010 - By News Team
There were more dirty tricks from our opponents over the Bank Holiday weekend when the Facebook sites of at least five of our General Election candidates were hacked and hateful and racist slogans and images were posted on them.
This spate hacking was the second within a week following on from the disgraceful attack on the Facebook pages of ex-serviceman Colin Marsh, the British National Party candidate for Weaver Vale who found Nazi insignia had illegally been posted on his site. The first Mr Marsh knew about it was when he was contacted by the media, but it was established that they were rogue postings and quickly removed.
Even the most avid anti-BNP elements within the media admitted to finding it “rather fishy” that they had been contacted and directed to the Facebook sites of specific British National Party candidates, all of which had “recent racist postings all of a similar nature”.
Following on from setting up bogus BNP candidates and the paying of an ex-BNP member £6,000 to tell a pack of lies, the anti-BNP campaign is desperate to try to de-rail the British National Party’s election effort with just 48 hours to go. That’s why Nick Griffin has asked BNP candidates to take down their Facebook pages until after Thursday.
“There’s a deliberate campaign to discredit our candidates, so let’s play it safe and deny our opponents this opportunity. We are on the verge of making history by achieving the highest nationalist vote ever in a General Election, and the anti-BNP brigade will do everything in their power to stop us,” Nick told the BNP website.
“In both Barking and Stoke Central we are mounting a real and significant challenge to Labour and the establishment are running scared.
“Over the last three weeks the Party has received a record number of enquiries, new members and donations and on Thursday the British National Party looks set to establish itself as Britain’s fourth most popular political party.”

Tory David Cameron and Lib Nick Clegg Attending Racist Black vote rallies sell out the British People

Created: Monday, 03 May 2010 09:33 Author: rugfish 

I wrote a short article yesterday about David Cameron and Nick Clegg attending rallies which were held specifically for black people by a group calling itself Operation Black Vote.
The two video's I placed within the article show Cameron and Clegg, blatantly inciting racial hatred in Britain with open promises which amount to a discrimination against white people with their promises of black peoples agendas that they say will promote black people into opportunities which they have each described are currently lacking, and they both promise to counter what they describe as an existing racial divide which they say makes black people victims in our society.
Clegg made the further claim that there was something inherently unfair about the police exercising powers of stop and search predominantly against black people which he described as disproportionate. i.e. They should stop more white people so it's fair.
I accuse them both of inciting racial hatred for reasons which I think are plainly obvious.
Items to note:
Gordon Brown, as far as I am aware, has not referred to the British National Party and its members in much other than a vague way when he has implied we are 'racist' and I believe (unless others know different), that he has also indicated his belief that many of its although not racist, members have simply fallen into supporting the British National Party because for want of other reason, they feel threatened in their jobs by immigration.
It is not like me to stand up for Gordon Brown but I have to point the obvious difference out between his public utterance and those of Cameron and Clegg.
Cameron has referred to the leader of the British National Party as "ghastly filth".
He has made no retraction of this statement despite he has been made aware that British National Party supporters agree fundamentally with the views expressed by their party leader Mr Nick Griffin MEP, and may equally attribute Cameron's insult to themselves.
Cameron has a big filthy mouth and if I saw him in person I would tell David Cameron that.
But now he has also proven himself to be racist and an unthinking idiot who aims for power without a care for who he upsets. In this case it happens to be white people he's picking on with his racist, bullying attitude which he doesn't try to hide.
As for Clegg, he may not have shown such clear hostility toward the British National Party but I believe he follows suit with Cameron.
After their first debate I watched Clegg walking down the steps from the stage toward the audience. You might remember this as Gordon Brown was left alone and was later castigated next day by the media for breaking the agreement made by each party leader that they would not do so.
Anyone who watches body language will understand what I mean when seeing Cameron 'beckon' back Clegg from the bottom step and seeing Clegg meekly obeying.
Of course without knowing personally, I can guess that because they are attending the same groups, adopting the same policies, and are both visibly determined together to 'make Britain a fairer society for black people', that they are in cahoots with one another, but you only have to look to see who is leading so called anti-fascist groups like UAF, to see how he is leading the Conservative party and LibDem leader with their 'race attacks' against white people.
I also note Cameron's visit to America and his audience with Obama, and his ready adoption of Saul Alinsky's plan for a Big Society, which Cameron has spoken about at length, and has admitted he has copied it.
Readers might want to note that Saul Alinsky was also a left-wing subversive.
Clearly there is a marked difference between 'activism' and 'subversion', for subversion works AGAINST the state and its people and it works against established societal norms in order to subvert them rather than to actively campaign within a democracy as an equal part of the process.
It is for Cameron to refute my claims that he is a leftwing subversive character who is playing the race card in order to incite a race war in Britain.
He doesn't need to refute that he has a big filthy mouth because that's a fact which won't go away whether he lives to be 90 or 100 for that part of his history has already written.
What I want to know is 'why' he is subverting society and why is he stoking racial tension?
I have some basis for my opinion and I think for those who are interested in keeping up here, you might want to look at America and what is currently happening under the Obama's (Saul Alinsky) administration in terms of his immigration and 'hate laws' where he opened the doors to mass immigration whilst creating hate laws that make it a criminal offense to argue with it, and is now paying the price there with mass protests.
The American people are rallying behind the Tea Party there in an effort to stop this mad man, and are being castigated by politicians and the media as 'racists'.
Yesterday, one of Cameron's candidates David Davies was referred to by his opponent as on the 'far-right', simply because he wanted to discuss immigration.
David Davies likens this to being called a 'Nazi'.
We had Gordon Brown the other day with his gaffe when referring to a lady as a 'bigot', because she asked him where all the immigrants are flocking from.
Yes, you might agree that Brown is as bad as the other two here but he didn't say that publically. He said it privately and that's the difference between him and Cameron. i.e. Cameron is intentionally saying these things publically and is intentionally trying to stir racial hatred and is intentionally subverting democracy and perhaps unintentionally or otherwise, has a big mouth to make a Big Society which he clearly intends will not include us 'white people'.
Finally, there is ample evidence of 'white people' being discriminated against in Britain.
Let me ask then for comments from David Cameron's 'black people', about what they think of Cameron's big mouth and his patronising speeches which if I were black would make my blood boil.
Surely no respectable citizen who feels he or she has made a success of their lives in Britain would say this was 'because he or she was black?
Surely if a black person thought that then their success means nothing at all.
Cameron you have some questions to answer with that big filthy mouth of yours!
Arizona's immigration laws are a 'cry of frustration'. CNN NEWS

Washington (CNN) - Arizona's controversial immigration law is a "cry of frustration" by state and local officials who need comprehensive federal immigration reform, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Sunday. In appearances on morning talk shows, Napolitano criticized the law as a hindrance to law enforcement and said only an overall approach will work. The law "puts everybody at risk" by diverting attention of police and sheriffs from higher-priority crimes, Napolitano told the CNN program "State of the Union." "There was no surprise to me that experienced individuals like the Pima County sheriff, who is the longest standing sheriff in Arizona, he is in Tucson, 100 miles from the border, has said he doesn't want this new law, he doesn't need it, and he is not going to enforce it," Napolitano said.

Foundations of Betrayal: How the Liberal SuperRich Undermine Am

Millions of Muslims feel trapped by the Cult of Mohammed

Islam is not a religion based on the Judea Christian Tradition of the Sovereignty of man or The choice between good & evil but is a cult based on the Pagan tradition of the Arabs See link  pure submission. In none of the Jewish Christian doctrines are told to beat and kill with such relish there fellow man, they are taught to convert by persuasion not by the threat of the sword . Also a apostate was always given a second chance even in the conflict between 15th cent conflict between Puritanism and Catholicism.
But in Islam theirs is a cult were Millions of Muslims feel trapped due there knowledge of the truth of the falseness of their cult  See link, and desperately want to leave it, but in Islam alone it tells that to do so will carry a penalty of certain death if converting to another faith ! where in the Christian faith we have the Parable of the the good Shepard who go,s in search of his lost sheep (Apostate) , a story of love and compassion,
But in Islam they have no love and compassion in their teachings for the lost sheep or for any who raise a criticism but only what  seems to be a one way ticket to the abattoir. I feel that many Muslims would leave that oppressive cult if it was not for the fear of death or the radical community that surrounds them, and the fear that it imposes even on those who do not belong to it also!

The White Manifesto — The Price of Race Inequality

May 3, 2010 - By BNP News

“The White Manifesto — The Price of Race Inequality” has been produced by a coalition of over 30 white progressive organisations.

The manifesto aims to place race equality and the eradication of poverty at the forefront of this spring’s election campaign and the government’s policy priorities.

The title ‘the Price of Race Inequality’ reflects the fact that the current economic crisis poses a unique challenge to Britain.

As a nation we face an unprecedented and long-term economic recession and a widening of the inequality gap.

Ensuring that Britain creates the conditions to eradicate poverty and puts racial equality at the forefront of the social and economic agenda will be critical to successfully meeting these challenges.

And to all those who would ask if we are now beyond race, this Manifesto answers no. Today we can objectively measure structural inequalities, discrimination and disparities in the criminal justice system, employment, education, poverty, health and housing.

Disparate outcomes for White people in the UK have NOT been eliminated and, in fact in some areas, have increased.

The government must place race equality at the forefront of its agenda, and create the optimum conditions to eradicate poverty and injustice.

Six months work from over 30 organisations involved in race equality on this Manifesto represents the concern felt over the position of race in Britain in 2010.

The organisations include (besides those in the press release) Cambridge Union White Students Campaign, NUS White Students Campaign, the Northern Ireland Council for Whites, White Christian Leaders Forum, Whites In England, Friends of Whites, Capacity Global, the Euro Trust, Urban Forum, JCORE, WTEG (White Training and Enterprise Group), Society of White Lawyers, White Mental Health UK, the National White Police Association, Bristol Development Agency, White Workers North West, Winston Churchill Housing Association, and many others who advised on sections or gave editorial help.

Are you shocked by reading this article so far?

If so, then consider the following: the above statement is a verbatim copy of a press release issued by the taxpayer-funded Operation Black Vote organisation, which you can find on their website (which you have paid for) by clicking here.

The press release announced the launch of the “Black Manifesto” for the 2010 elections, which contains demands for affirmative action (anti-white discrimination) and forced state and private subsidies for non-indigenous ethnic people currently residing in Britain.

All that has been changed is the replacement of the word “black” with “white.”

Somehow, no one seems to be bothered that non-indigenous groups in Britain can organise openly around their ethnic identities.

They can have a Cambridge Union Black Students Campaign, an NUS Black Students Campaign, the Northern Ireland Council for Ethnic Minorities, Black Christian Leaders Forum, Sikhs In England, Friends of Al Aqsa, Capacity Global, the Afiya Trust, Urban Forum, JCORE, BTEG (Black Training and Enterprise Group), Society of Black Lawyers, Black Mental Health UK, the National Black Police Association, Bristol Development Agency, Migrant Workers North West and the Steve Biko Housing Association, amongst many others.

But let one organisation — the British National Party — dare to stand up for the rights of the indigenous population of this nation, and watch how the establishment vilifies it.

The BNP stands unashamedly for the rights of the ethnic British people, the Scots, the Irish, the Welsh and the English — in exactly the same way that all of the abovementioned organisations stand for the rights of their communities.

The Uncomfortable Definition of an Infidel

I have been sent this it is by via a contact a email from a  Prison officer who was one a training course in London this last month!

 

The Uncomfortable Definition of an Infidel....
 

Allah or Jesus Christ?

Islam is the fastest growing religion in the UK .

Last month I attended my annual training session for maintaining my
security clearance in the prison service.
There was a presentation by three speakers from the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained their beliefs.

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say about the basics of Islam, complete with video.

After the presentations, question time. I directed my question to the Imam and asked:

'Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a Holy War against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven.

If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'

There was no disagreement with my statement and, without hesitation, he replied, 'Non-believers!'

I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to  kill everyone who is not a follower of Allah, so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority to that of 'a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the biscuit tin.'

 He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'

 I then stated, 'Well, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope Benedict commanding all Catholics to kill Muslims, or the Archbishop of Canterbury ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'

 The Imam was speechless!

 I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your 'friend' when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because He will take me to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
 

You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam remained speechless.

Needless to say, the organizers of the Diversification' seminar were not happy with this way of exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.

Within twenty years, i.e.. 2029, there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.K.

To elect a government of their choice, complete with Sharia law

Everyone in the U.K. Should be required to read this, but with the current political paralysis, tolerant justice system, liberal media and p.c. Madness, there is no way this will be widely publicised.

Please paste and copy & pass this on to all your e-mail contacts.

 John Harrison MBE. MIDSc

The above meeting happened in London