The end of racial appeasement Article from the USA

I have come across this article I recommend a view of this interesting USA website/Blog.

The end of racial appeasement

Jul 23rd, 2010

by Brett Stevens.at the http://www.amerika.org/ website

Since the end of the Civil War, America has embarked on a policy of “racial appeasement,” or gifting minority populations with money and power to stave off the inevitable conflict brought on by diversity. As America wakes up to how easily an accusation of racism can crush a career, people are re-thinking racial appeasement and thinking instead of options to diversity.
Picture this for a movie:
On planet Raeth, injustice reigns. The ruling group, Aucascians, have oppressed the Friacans, who don’t have technology and have been in the past cruelly enslaved and used as cheap labor. When a few people of good moral character figure this out, they band together to help the Friacans gain political power. Eventually, a Friacan is elected with the promise that racial antagonism will end, Friacans and Aucascians will breed together into a new race, and peace will reign forever.
Except that it doesn’t happen. The movie doesn’t end there; instead we see the Friacan president struggling, realizing that he has to both make Friacans like him, and avoid having the Aucascians feel attacked. He starts trying to transfer wealth and power to the Friacans, which makes the Aucascians realize: now we’re the target, and soon we’ll be oppressed like the Friacans were, if we don’t do something about it.
Sound familiar?
When we elected Barack Obama, his constituents hoped for many things. The white people who voted for him were primarily young and inexperienced; 95% of black people voted for him, as did many members of other ethnic groups. They elected him for the same reason they elected Bill Clinton, which was a hope for racial reconciliation and a happy ever after story.
Instead they got an intensification of racial resentment. Race relations are probably more tense now that at any previous time except the morning after the Watts riots wound down. Both groups are slowly starting to realize: in a diverse society, one group has to be on top. Both can’t be. Even more, if you try to “raise up” one group, you’re going to do it at the expense of the other, and then they’ll hate each other.
Brushing past the insane racists (people who hate black people and consider them inferior) and insane anti-racists (who consider wanting to be of your own race to be racist) we can see that this problem has no end. The problem isn’t white people. It isn’t black people. It’s diversity.

Never in recorded history has diversity been anything but a problem. Look at Ireland with its Protestant and Catholic populations, Canada with its French and English populations, Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.
Or consider the warring factions in India, Sri Lanka, China, Iraq, Czechoslovakia (until it happily split up), the Balkans and Chechnya. Also look at the festering hotbeds of tribal warfare — I mean the beautiful mosaics — in Third World hellholes like Afghanistan, Rwanda and South Central, L.A.
“Diversity” is a difficulty to be overcome, not an advantage to be sought. True, America does a better job than most at accommodating a diverse population. We also do a better job at curing cancer and containing pollution. But no one goes around mindlessly exclaiming: “Cancer is a strength!” “Pollution is our greatest asset!” – Ann Coulter

Very few people would voice this sentiment because the populist political parties — those most popular with those who are least invested in understanding the mechanism of governance and economics — tend to group together “critics of any attribute of diversity” with “racists: those who hate black people.”
But the facade has been cracking. After Andrew Briedbart trolled the left by showing them how damaging an unsourced whisper of “racism” could be, people are starting to realize that the situation is unstable. Blacks aren’t happy; whites aren’t happy. Other ethnic groups are caught in the middle, but all ethnic groups are starting to realize that one ethnic group must rule us — trying to split the power isn’t working and cannot work.
Interestingly, the same thing is happening in Europe, where immigrants from backgrounds as varied as Turks, Arabs, Africans and Asians are finding it hard to integrate. They find themselves in ghettoes, despising the local population and in turn being despised, while governments make more laws to prevent discrimination and write more checks to subsidize them.
We’re even seeing people on the left trying to compete with the Tea Party for the white middle class vote, since not only are those people numerous, but they’re economically, socially and politically important as a creative force in America.
The Tea Party was a classic Libertarian backlash: we don’t want the entitlement state, and we don’t want a moral government telling us how to think, especially if that thinking includes a morality of self-destruction. Tea Party logic is that if other ethnic groups can demand self-serving change, so can white people, starting with the elimination of politically privileged ethnic groups.
In other words, if we’re going to be fair, we should apply the same standards to everyone. If a black person isn’t racist for wanting to marry a black person, then a white person should not be racist for wanting to marry a white person. If “black power” is socially acceptable, “white power” should be too. That’s real diversity. But it’s not what the left has been supporting; instead, in their view, only white people can be racist. That got old real fast.

…
The injustices endured by black Americans at the hands of their own government have no parallel in our history, not only during the period of slavery but also in the Jim Crow era that followed. But the extrapolation of this logic to all “people of color”—especially since 1965, when new immigration laws dramatically altered the demographic makeup of the U.S.—moved affirmative action away from remediation and toward discrimination, this time against whites.
…
Policy makers ignored such disparities within America’s white cultures when, in advancing minority diversity programs, they treated whites as a fungible monolith. Also lost on these policy makers were the differences in economic and educational attainment among nonwhite cultures. Thus nonwhite groups received special consideration in a wide variety of areas including business startups, academic admissions, job promotions and lucrative government contracts. – “Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege,” James Webb, Wall Street Journal

In other words, we can’t expect to force people to be equal and we can’t fix the past by discriminating against Caucasians. This makes sense, but Webb is serving democratic interests here by trying to apply a band-aid to a situation that’s ready to explode.
Think about two salient facts:

• Everywhere diversity has been tried, it has brought conflict and instability. This applies to diversity of ethnic/racial groups as well as religion, radical political differences, or radical leaps in ability or economic power (class/caste). People like to point to the West and say, “See, it’s working out OK, especially in Canada” forgetting that diversity on any measurable scale has only been in effect for thirty to forty years, which from a historical viewpoint is less than the blink of an eye. What does other modern and ancient history show us? That diversity causes conflict and ultimately destabilizes a nation, leaving behind a society of the third world type.
• Different ethnic groups evolved differently. We shouldn’t worry about whether this extends to the potential or abilities of individuals, but should point out that no continent was ever completely dominated by a foreign authority. Had these continents wanted to invented technology, they could have but did not. Evidence suggests that limited efforts were made along those lines. So there’s a reason why some groups, notably Jews, Western Europeans, and North Asians succeed and still stay on top of the game: they developed along these directions and maintain the ability to do so. It’s not racist to admit this, since these are subsets of races rather than racial groups in themselves.

We can at this point either face history, and see that the diversity experiment in America is doomed to failure because someone must always rule and everyone else will rebel, or continue our “out of sight, out of mind” policy of racial appeasement. Policies of racial appeasement:

• The welfare state. We’ll transfer money from others to you if you’re having trouble.
• Affirmative action. We’ll put you first in line, maybe that’ll help.
• Political correctness. We’ll insist you are magical, innocent and vital so that you become symbolically important.
• Conflict avoidance. If a white cop shoots a black guy in Oakland, we’ll lock down the city and excuse you if you riot. It’s not your fault; you were wronged.
• Anti-discrimination legislation. As much a handout as legal redress, this enables you to sue someone if you don’t get hired or rented to, even if you’re incompetent or dangerous, as some individuals of all ethnies and races are.
• We’ll elect one of you. Barack Obama has less experience, a past with less documentation or evidence of competence, and less experience with decision-making than any president in history. He was elected because he was black and we hoped that would end the race debacle.

Racial appeasement ran its course because it appeared to be the path of least resistance. After a disastrous civil war, no one wanted to bother with partitioning the United States, or even repatriating its former slaves with compensation. Through the next generations, race riots were commonplace about every decade, and appeasement was the policy there, too.
Horrible racist injustices did happen, as did cruelty, but the perpetrators have been punished where caught, and now are thoroughly marginalized especially after WWII, when we defeated that big evil racist, Hitler. For every incident, an appeasement was tabled, until we get to the point where government looks first to hire minorities, businesses are scrambling to hire minorities, all of our movies feature positive stereotypes of minorities, and we’ve elected a black man as president. When does one appease enough?
As the dust settled after Obama’s election, a sinking feeling set in among Americans. What if this didn’t do the trick? What if this is an ongoing problem instead of something we can solve with one gesture of appeasement? As Neville Chamberlain found out when appeasing Hitler just delayed the inevitable war, appeasement doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for blacks, or whites, or anyone else. And so the myth of racial appeasement starts to crumble.

White British School Pupils Set to be Minority by 2021 Colonisation of Britain Shock

The Colonisation of Britain: White British School Pupils Set to be Minority by 2021

BNP News team

A BNP News analysis of official Government figures have shown that the ethnic “minority” school-going population will be an absolute majority in British schools by 2021, less than ten years away.

The shocking figures are based on statistics released by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in 2006, which do not take into account the massive flood of immigrants over the past five years which will skew the time scale further against the indigenous population.

According to the figures, in 2007 at least at least 20 percent of all children in Britain were from the ethnic “minorities.” (Source). 

The official figures for 2006 showed that ethnic “minorities” accounted for 22 percent of pupils at primary school. This was an increase of 2 percent from the previous year.  (Source).   

The 2 percent per year increase in ethnic “minority” pupils was replicated at secondary level schools, which in 2006 rose to 17.7 percent. (Source).   

Discounting increased immigration and using a straight 2 percent growth rate per year, the 2006 figures mean that this year (2010) some 32 percent of all primary school pupils are of ethnic “minority” origin.

Using the same calculation of a 2 percent growth rate, the 2006 figures mean that the 2010 secondary school ethnic “minority” pupil rate is now 27 percent.

Given this growth rate, white British children will become an absolute minority in British schools by the year 2021, when the “ethnic “minority” levels will reach over 50 percent.

It is important to bear in mind that the 2006 figures are already half a decade old, and do not account for the dramatic increase in immigration over the past five years.

In many areas, white children are already a minority. According to the Birmingham City Council, 61 percent of all primary school children in greater Birmingham this year are already of Third World origin. (Source). 

In 2007 it was reported that whites were already a minority in London classrooms. (Source).  http://tinyurl.com/2dqslcc and in 2008, more than 30 state schools in England were made up solely of ethnic minority pupils with no white children on the roll. (Source). 

According to Data collected by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) between 1992-1994 and 1997-1999, the number of people from “minority” ethnic groups grew by 15 percent compared to 1 percent for white people. (Source). 

Figures released by the ONS in January 2009 revealed that the Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years. Their population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society. (Source). 

The massive increase in immigration between the years 2006 and 2010 will only have increased the ethnic “minority” population even further, so even the projection of 2021 is possibly “optimistic” and whites will become a minority even before that year.

The British people stand before a historic choice over the next few years. They can continue to vote for the Lib-Lab-Con party and endorse the utter destruction by ethnic cleansing of Britain, or they can vote for the British National Party.

Arizona illegal Immigrants Protest A Picture tells a Thousand words

THEY SAY A PICTURE SAYS A THOUSAND WORDS , SO I WON'T WRITE THEM JUST LOOK AT THIS IMAGE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS PROTESTING ABOUT ARIZONA'S NEW AND CORRECT IMMIGRATION LAWS!

Andrew Brons MEP, BNP Educated Politician Vs Weyman Bennet UAF Thug and Retard, Radio Interviews

Andrew Brons MEP, BNP Educated Politician Vs Weyman Bennet UAF Thug and Retard, Radio Interviews,

Author the Horwich Nationalists

Andrew Bron

 

 

This Radio interview of Andrew Brons shows how much of a educated and articulate BNP representative the British People have in the European Parliament, Mr Brons easily answers all the hostile questions in a polite and informed manner showing how much of a gentleman and informed politician he is.

weyman Bennett Of the UAF

And yet on the other hand you will hear the spokesman of the violent Marxist UAF weyman Bennett, ( who was arrested for organising violence against the English in Bolton this early this year, pictured). go into a, what can only be described a retard diatribe of lies and false accusations , so bad that even the biased media types had to call a end abruptly to he's section of the interview. 

But the most alarming aspect of this collection of violent Marxist thugs called the UAF, is that the are being supported by our present Prime Minister Cameron, who is signed up to their charter. 

This shows quite clearly that the Old Party political elite are using not only repressive anti free speech laws and race hate quangos such as the EHCR , to quash our ancient liberties, but are also the sponsors of a violent political militia , similar to those run by Robert Mugabees Zanu PF party in Zimbabwe.

please listen to this interview , and then decide if you should just idly sit by and watch your children's hard won freedom be taken away from them.  use this link to join or donate the British National Party and resist the True LIB/LAB/CON Fascist parties in Britain today https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

60% of New Babies Born in UK Now of Immigrant Origin

The Third World Colonisation of Britain: at Least 60% of New Babies Now of Immigrant Origin

From the BNP Newsroom

At least 60 percent of all new babies in Britain in 2009 were born to non-indigenous recent arrival immigrant mothers or to second or third generation immigrant parents, a BNP News analysis of birth rates and population statistics has shown.

The shocking figures, which mean that projections on how long the Third World will take to utterly overrun Britain will have to be revised downwards once again, are based on a comparison between new Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures and existing data.

The new ONS figures, released yesterday, showed that 24.7 percent of children born in Britain last year have mothers who were born abroad.

These figures have doubled since the late 1990s.

According to the ONS figures, around 10 percent of babies are “born to mothers from New Commonwealth countries,” in other words, the Third World, with Pakistan topping the list.

An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

In London around half of babies have foreign-born mothers while in Newham and Brent, around three quarters of children have mothers who were born abroad.

As shocking as these figures are, they do not tell the whole story.

According to the ONS Population Review of 2004 and 2005: England and Wales, legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.

A December 2009 ONS report revealed that 10.9 percent (or 6.7 million) of the currently resident population of Britain was not born in this country.

A 2005 ONS report said that in the previous year, 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”

This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers. Once it is added in, the non-indigenous birth rate climbs to just over 50 percent of all births in Britain — and this in 2005, data which is already five years old.

This figure, combined with yesterday’s ONS announcement, means that at least 60 percent and possibly more of all live births in Britain last year were of immigrant origin.

Britain is being utterly colonised with the active assistance of the Westminster parties. The British people only had a limited amount of time left over in which to halt and reverse this tidal wave, otherwise our culture, language, traditions and heritage are set to be ethnically cleansed off the face of the earth.

Recommended reading: The Immigration Invasion: How Third World Immigration is Destroying the First World and What Must be Done to Stop It

By Arthur Kemp. A shocking book detailing the full extent of the Third World immigration wave which is swamping the Western World.

Using the latest numbers and projections, it explains why Third World immigration will destroy the First World, with individual chapters on Britain, Europe, Russia, Canada, the USA, Australia and New Zealand.

Shows that, if left unchecked, the entire First World will be overrun within the next 50 years. Finally, it discusses in frank terms what needs to be done to avoid this catastrophe.

Softcover, 140 pp.

Click here to order online.

RADIO RWB INTERVIEW: Nick Griffin’s Palace Refusal an Attack on Democracy

RADIO RWB INTERVIEW: Nick Griffin’s Palace Invite Refusal an Attack on Democracy

From The BNP Newsroom,

The politically motivated refusal to allow British National Party leader Nick Griffin MEP to attend a tea party at Buckingham Palace is an attack on democracy, the media, freedom of speech and one million British patriots.

This was the reaction of Mr Griffin to the news that officials had informed him at the last minute that he was being barred from the party for allegedly making “political capital” out of the visit by granting media interviews.

“The reason is invented nonsense,” Mr Griffin said. “Nowhere in the book of rules given to all attendees does it say anything about not giving media interviews and of course countless people have done precisely that in the past.

“This decision is an attack on the media and their right to report on important events of the day.

“It is an attack on the right of every person in Britain to get the news of current events reported by the media, and it is an attack on the one million plus patriots who voted for the BNP,” Mr Griffin said.

“The move has obviously been made under pressure from the ConDem regime who are desperate for any reason to bar the BNP,” Mr Griffin said.

The BNP leader dismissed as nonsense the claim that he had tried to make political capital out of the invitation.

“The media would of course be interested in an invitation to a BNP MEP to attend a party at Buckingham Palace.

“To use that natural media interest as an excuse to withdraw the invitation is a disgusting disregard for democracy in Britain,” he said.

“The ruling elite must realise that blatant attempts at gagging the BNP always backfires and we will emerge from these situations and their double standards stronger than ever,” Mr Griffin said.

If you can help the British Resistance fend off the increasingly desperate but dangerous establishment attacks on the party then click on the button below to send a small gift:

> Click Here to Make a Donation

LISTEN TO NICK GRIFFIN BEING INTERVIEWED ON THE DAY'S EVENTS ON RADIO RWB.

Click here to go to Radio RWB's breaking news section and click on the RWB Player Launch icon on the right hand side.

Andrew Brons ,BNP ,MEP Question on the Euro collapse scenario.

Question on the Euro collapse scenario.

  by Martin Wingfield

JULY 2010: 
Andrew Brons has submitted this written question to the European Commission regarding the ongoing strains in the Eurozone and its possible collapse.

Markets often develop an ominous momentum during the summer months when everyone, including politicians, are on holiday.
The MEP for Yorkshire and North East Lincolnshire asks:
"Given the perilous conditions within financial markets, the fundamental economic and fiscal immbalances in the PIIGS countries, the debt crises within those
countries and their short and medium term economic prospects - within the backdrop of recession - will the Commission kindly advise:
1. What representations it has made to the Monet Professors in respect of the crisis above and the related future for the Euro.
2. What advice and representations the Monet Professors have submitted to the Commission with regard to the same.
3. Will the Commission kindly confirm rumours that it has drawn up contingency plans for the collapse of the present Eurozone area and the nature of those plans.
4. Will the Commission finally advise the internal discussions it has held relating to the damage a collapse to the Eurozone will create in terms of the prospects for 'ever closer union' and the dire public relations disaster that will ensue."
read more from Andrew Brons MEP @ http://www.andrewbronsmep.eu/?q=news

David Crausby Labour MP Dimissal of Big Society ?

David Crausby Labour MP

As part of his dismissal of Cameron’s ‘Big Society’ initiative David Crausby, Bolton North East MP has sort to suggest that Labour has already done its part to redistribute power. The local press quoted Mr Crausby as saying ‘the Labour Party has devolved a lot of power to local people through the likes of area forums.



I’ve attended quite a number of area forums in Bolton North East and I haven’t seen Mr Crausby at any of them. But I can tell him that Bolton’s elected members are very quick to refer to awkward questions asked at forums as ‘political’; therefore not requiring an answer.



It is also the case that the minutes taken at forums are inaccurate: however I don’t see why there should be any reason to believe the Tories distribution of power would be any less corrupt than Labour’s.



Anthony Backhouse

Anti-BNP Court Cases What The Political Agenda Behind It ?

Anti-BNP Court Cases: Does Anyone Really Believe They’re Accidental?

From the BNP Newsroom

Special report by Nick Griffin MEP—Does anyone really believe that the slew of anti-BNP court cases are accidental? The truth is that they are part of a co-ordinated plan to break the party, says British National Party leader Nick Griffin, MEP.

Nick Griffin MEPMost BNP Internet users will be aware by now of the huge and co-ordinated campaign of disinformation and black propaganda directed against the British National Party and its leadership.

This operation clearly originates with the extremely well-funded far-left/Zionist front group Searchlight.

 As large numbers of decent people have worked out, it involves lies and innuendo libel on a massive scale.

Its aim is to break the BNP, almost certainly to clear the way for the false flag English Defence League operation to mutate into a political party, thereby corralling nationalism in the UK into a safely controlled multi-cultural dead end.

While we expect to be viciously attacked from outside, some of our people are less able to recognise black propaganda and misinformation when it appears to come from within our own ranks. But that is what we are now facing, so it is time for people to learn the real facts.

The far-left’s concerted campaign of lies and false rumours is also being promoted by a clique of superficially ‘internal’ knockers (generally motivated by personal grudges or a liberal agenda, but no doubt also including the treacherous paid ‘moles’ who provide the detailed accounts of all significant BNP events to Searchlight and various well-informed Marxist blogs).

One of these people’s lines of attack at present is the allegation that I have recklessly involved the party in a string of ‘unnecessary’ court cases.

 If this was true, it would be a matter for genuine concern. But, as is the case with all this black propaganda aimed at the naive and ill-informed, the truth is really very different, as a review of the cases involved quickly proves:

EQUALITY COMMISSION V NICK GRIFFIN, SIMON DARBY & TANYA LUMBY

This case was brought by the Marxist-led Commission and rushed into court even though we clearly signalled our willingness to discuss the issues they had raised in their pre-action letter and to seek a negotiated settlement.

In the face of this blatant bias and unreasonableness we changed our Constitution to remove the grounds they had for their direct discrimination claim.

Had this been done any way other than at legal gunpoint, if we had simply surrendered, the issue would have split the party. But I steered a course which took things to the wire but preserved our unity.

The response from Trevor Phillips and his seventy taxpayer-funded lawyers was shocking but not unexpected. Denied the opportunity to use direct discrimination as a club with which to bash us into the ground, they switched to the claim that our Statement of Principles stand against immigration (part of our Constitution since 1982) is indirectly discriminatory, because large numbers of people of immigrant descent are likely to disagree with it.

This attempt to claim the right to determine a party’s political stance is an outrageous attack on the freedom of every voter and every political party in Britain. And it is one that was not seen coming by any of those now trying to advance their own secret agenda by calling this case ‘unnecessary’.

This second round attack would have been thrown at the BNP whoever was in charge no matter how we might have responded to the Commission bullies’ original attack.

Far from being badly handled as the wreckers claim, the good news is that the specialist indigenous civil rights solicitors firm we employed to draft our new Constitution saw the attack coming – as did the members who voted virtually unanimously at last year’s EGM to approve the new draft and thereby give me the power “to turn on a sixpence” and change the Constitution again if and when forced to do so.

This flexibility maximises our chances of fighting off Trevor Phillips’ latest undemocratic, anti-British attack on our freedom and indeed on our very existence as a party.

Fortunately, our lawyers have worked tirelessly to become experts in race relations laws currently and pending, as well as in matters relating to injunctions and alleged contempt of court.

So the next hearing will see us counter-attack by applying to the court to have the orders declared irregularly obtained and unfairly oppressive and struck down accordingly.

Of course we would rather not be in court with these overpaid leftists, but they keep coming for us because we are a threat, and thanks to our handling of the case and a very skilfully drafted Constitution, we’re in with a fighting chance of beating them off.

This top-level professional defence has cost a large amount of money, but we had no choice. When the Establishment starts to use the full weight of its anti-British laws to try to crush an opponent, to respond as DIY amateurs as the knockers have recommended would be suicidal folly.

And, whatever happens, every time we’re dragged back into court, we get a further wave of publicity in which the public see us as the victim of politically correct establishment bullying. Long-term, that is publicity and positioning that no amount of money could ever buy.

BNP V SADIE GRAHAM, MATT SINGLE AND OTHERS

At the start of 2008, a small clique of former employees twice used the BNP’s membership list to send bogus Bulletins to our entire membership. Great efforts were made to negotiate a ‘deal’ with the clique. I made a whole string of very reasonable offers and sent Eddy Butler to try to settle them down and obtain their assurance that they would stop abusing our members’ right to privacy.

These efforts came to nothing. As a result, acting on behalf of our members, I sought and obtained an injunction to prevent them illicitly using our membership list. What else could have been done?

Surely no one seriously thinks that we should allow our members’ personal details to be used and abused by wreckers or people trying to raise funds under false pretences?

At any time up until the injunction was granted, the clique could have given an undertaking not to use the list and it would never have got to court.

We have made repeated efforts since to settle the matter with both sides paying their own costs, but all have been rebuffed.

As everyone knows, two of the defendants, Sadie Graham and Matt Single, went on not only to use the list for their own gain but, even worse, leaked it on the Internet causing huge suffering to BNP members and supporters.

This goes to show that I was right to fear that they would badly misuse the list, and was right therefore to try to stop them.

The actions of these traitors led to elderly members being terrified by threatening phone calls, to people losing their jobs and even to physical attacks on members’ property.

Yet, disgracefully, part of the stated programme of the latest generation of would-be wreckers is to let these people and their allies back into the BNP. Most normal people would rather see them hounded through the courts for their treachery.

UNILEVER/MARMITE

More drivel has been written about this one than all the others put together.

The first thing to make clear is that it has not even been a “court case” in the traditional sense.

 In the run-up to the election, Marmite ran a series of adverts showing the ‘Hate Marmite’ Party, which was a carbon copy of the BNP.

These adverts steadily piled on the pressure with the idea that we are ‘haters’, and went so far as to glorify the use of violence against our members.

This huge campaign posed a clear and present danger to us, both politically and physically, and all attempts to stop it through normal channels came to nothing.

The biggest part of the danger was that, for most of the public, the anti-BNP message would sink in at a sub-conscious level. It was an example of dangerous interference in the democratic process which the regulatory authorities should have stopped.

We decided it was essential that we get out into the open the fact that the adverts were an attack on the BNP, so both we and several freelance sympathisers responded in various ways which Marmite would be unable to ignore.

Unilever’s consequent legal threats produced a gargantuan wave of national and international publicity, shortly before the election, which we could never have dreamt of buying, or of being able to afford to buy.

Publicity that keeps us in the public eye is invaluable to us. Sometimes we get it by standing in a parliamentary by-election in which we know we don’t stand a chance. That costs money, but it achieves its goal.

Far more publicity was obtained by this calculated brush with the legal department of a multi-national company, and we also stopped a subtle but very dangerous anti-PR campaign against us. Perhaps the knockers would rather we’d sat on our backsides and done nothing?

Fortunately we did act, and it paid off. With our growing ability to access proper legal resources we were able to resolve the dispute professionally and satisfactorily. The following is the statement agreed with Unilever as to how both parties regard the resolution of this dispute:

“Unilever and the BNP have agreed confidential terms of settlement to the satisfaction of both parties, so no further comment can be made”.

So the knockers pushing their own or their masters’ agendas by spouting crazy talk of enormous payments are not only lying as ever, they are cynically exploiting the fact we made a proper and confidential legal agreement.

 For us to breach this formal agreement – as troublemakers are trying to force us to do by spreading utterly false and alarmist rumours - would be improper and would indeed lead to us being dragged into court.

I must make it clear that the malicious lies of £170,000 in costs are utterly untrue and that the true costs are not even the tiniest fraction of this amount.

THE MICHAELA MACKENZIE CASE

Michaela Mackenzie was an efficient clerical worker for the BNP from home, but when put in charge of an office she turned out to be a disaster.

 To give just one example, around six thousand European Election inquiry packs were dumped on the pavement outside a Post Office depot without the correct mailing dockets being obtained, and were lost and destroyed as a direct result.

 Other people who have worked for the party before and since, but who have been found not be up to scratch have been sacked, and surely that’s the right thing to do rather than waste members’ money on sub-standard staff.

Others have accepted the position and done the decent thing, and have been willing to reach a sensible parting settlement. In the Mackenzie case, we made a real effort to reach a deal, sending Eddy Butler down to negotiate with her, as Simon Darby did successfully with two other staff members we let go at the same time.

For some reason or other, in this case the negotiations came to nothing.

Unfortunately, we found out too late that Michaela Mackenzie has a very long track record of suing for ‘wrongful dismissal’, and knew how to manipulate things to exploit our lack of experience in such matters.

Hence we had no choice but to reach a settlement. That, however, is now the subject of a counter-claim, hence our refusal to pay it.

Sacking any staff, even badly performing ones, is unpleasant and difficult. But strangely, the knockers who are backing a staff member who failed and who is trying to take money off the party, are also proposing that we sack good staff working from our highly efficient and profit-making Belfast administration and call centre (all of whom are BNP members and employees, contrary to the knockers’ black propaganda).

To break our lease and other contracts involved in this successful operation, and to sack efficient and loyal staff just because their faces or names don’t fit (even though they are BNP members), really would open up several legal cans of worms.

All of which shows how talk about ‘unnecessary court cases’ isn’t a genuine concern, but just another weapon in the armoury of the external opposition and their internal ‘useful idiots’.

We, however, have learned from this case, which is one reason we have now created a dedicated Human Resources/Staff Management team to ensure that from now on everything is done by the book by people who know all the ropes.

MARK CROUCHER v NICK GRIFFIN

Mark Croucher is a former UKIP Press Officer with known links to Searchlight.

During the European Election, he tried to get bailiffs to seize the Truth Truck in order to enforce a judgement he had got on the sly over the use of a photo of Nigel Farage for which he claimed copyright.

Ironically, this photo was posted on our website, against clear instructions, by one Andrew Edwards, a non-member who was doing volunteer work for us at the time but who now spends most of his time attacking the current BNP leadership over, among other things, ‘unnecessary court cases’. Pot, kettle, black!

We have since won a counter-claim and Croucher now owes us £1,000, but has managed to get the case continued.

Many in the Eurorealist movement look at Mark Croucher’ relentless attacks on both UKIP and the BNP and ask whose side he is really on? He poses as a Eurosceptic, but does nothing except attack parties opposed to Britain’s membership of the EU.

He was clearly desperate to drag us into court, and the ‘mistake’ by Andrew Edwards would have given him the opportunity regardless of who was in charge.

GREENWICH COUNCIL

Following the appearance of BNP advertising boards on lamp posts in South East London during the European Election, the Borough of Greenwich launched a legal action and a claim for £2,500 plus costs of up to £15,000 against the party.

This is just typical of the kind of low to medium level harassment to which we are subjected by leftwing council officials, in circumstances when no action would ever be taken against any other party.

Fortunately, Lee Barnes took up the case on our behalf, undertook an extensive study of the relevant laws, and has now forced the council to drop the case. Thanks to Mr. Barnes it hasn’t cost us a penny.

So there’s one that we won completely, but it could have gone the other way. Cases like these are an unavoidable side effect of being involved in the struggle at all.

The ones that have actually got as far as litigation are in fact only the tip of the iceberg; over the last few years we have successfully fought off several dozen of these vexatious attempts to grind us down.

This has partly been because I have a law degree and huge experience in working with legal experts. It takes time, money and mental energy, but it has to be done.

The Establishment don’t like us, so why should anyone be surprised when they take every possible opportunity to try to bleed us through the legal system? It comes with the territory.

Let’s face it, if they weren’t attacking us, we wouldn’t be doing our job.

Join The British National Party 

Our World Wars Fallen A Sacrifice Betrayed

Horwich Loco Workd WW1 memorial

                        Sacrifice Betrayed 

By Sarah Maid Of Albion
On Monday night there was a television documentary on called WWI: Finding the Lost Battalions regarding attempts to identify the recently discovered bodies of around 250 British and Australian troops who died during the brutal Battle of Fromelles in July 1916, half way through the First World war and who had been buried in unmarked communal graves.

This process had been made more difficult by the fact that most formal identification had been taken from the bodies mostly by the Germans, who had forwards this on to the Red Cross, so that the families of the dead could be informed that their husband, lover or child had fallen and lay amongst the bodies of his comrades in a foreign field.

Hence, in addition to DNA testing, it was necessary to examine other objects which had lain with the bodies for almost a hundred years.

One particularly poignant item, amongst many, was a tiny leather pouch in the shape of a heart, which when the century old stitches were painstakingly unpicked, revealed its long concealed contents, what remained of a lock of hair. The tiny item, evidence of a love torn apart by that cruel war, had been carried into battle by the object of that love and then it had lain with him throughout that century and into the next.

A small fragile token of a love long forgotten, shared by lovers now long dead, but with the power to touch us now in another time and in another world.

As the process continued and as bones were identified families were contacted and notified that the remains of grandfathers, great grandfathers, and in the case of one woman in her late 90’s, the father she had never known had been found.

It was then that the grey and sepia tinted photographs of fresh, handsome and achingly young faces were taken from boxes, passed down through families and stored away in attics, and the stories of those brave young heroes sacrificed so young and in such great numbers, so very long ago, began to be told.

We heard in their own words as their views changes as they realised what they were facing. "It'll be rather fun out there," Lt Charles Phipps, who died aged 20, assured his family in one letter home before heading to France. But a later note told of "the horrible smell of dead bodies in the trenches". The cameras followed Lt Phipps' great-niece, Fenella Tillier, as she travelled to Fromelles to stand on the very trench where he died - then later found his name on a war memorial. "Life isn't fair - and what was it all for?" she wondered aloud, and many of us watching will have wondered the same.

Another story was of a young man called Robert, born in Scotland but raised in Australia, and fighting for the Empire in an Australian regiment. Together with Robert’s own great niece, we read his letters to his mother revealing the excitement of a boy embarking on the adventure that would be his brief but bold manhood. Then we read the letters his hauntingly beautiful fiancé Nancy had sent to her would be mother in law, expressing her grief at the loss of “her boy” and how much she had loved him.

Nancy’s letters had ceased shortly after the war, but the programme traced her and found that she had lived to a sturdy and handsome middle age, married a butcher and named one of her two sons Robert. As the name did not feature in either her, or her husband’s family, we can only surmise that he was named for her lost love, and wonder, with the other Robert’s great niece, whether the husband knew the reason for the choice, or whether it was a secret Nancy hid within her heart.

From Britain alone there are millions of such stories. So many young lovers torn apart never to meet again in this world, so many futures which could have been but never were, so many hopes dreams and plans which came to nothing, and in particular so many young men who sacrificed everything and died terrible deaths for the sake of their country and the love of their homeland.

Those death were terrible, out of respect for the dead no bodies were shown, but one who had seen them said that few looked as if they lay in comfort and most appeared to have died in agony.

What was the purpose of this ocean of death, agony blood and heart ache? what did so many give up so much for? For every one, the purpose was this country, they died for England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, they died for this land and for its people.

But they were betrayed by man and by women not worthy to walk the land they died for.

Politicians who came after them, and who cared nothing for their sacrifice and to whom such concepts as love, honour and patriotism are beyond their understanding, have betrayed their memory and maybe even rendered their sacrifice meaningless.

Does anyone believe those millions of young men who died for this land would not recoil in horror at what has become of it. They did not for one instant imagine they were dying so that greedy self serving politicians could replace their grandchildren in their home land. They did not die so Britain could be given to Islam.

The biggest lie is the one told when the political scum oozes out of that repository of treachery and deceit beside Parliament Square and claim that the multi-racial experiment being imposed upon the descendants of those who died in the world wars, or in the case of the second war, upon those who survived it in their old age, somehow represents the spirit and principle for which they fought, it does not.

They did not fight suffer and die so that their grandchildren could be disinherited for the sake of a Marxist fantasy, for make no mistake, if our current pack, and I use that word advisedly, of politicians have their way, in less time than the bones of those young soldiers have lain in that field in Northern France, there will be no Britain for those of native British blood to inherit.

The Millions of British soldiers who died in the great conflicts of the 20th Century did not lay down their lives and the futures they could have had in order that their homeland could be given away so that a grasping politician could import some extra votes or keep wages artificially low. They did not sacrifice their chance of love, fatherhood and old age so that vast and growing areas of Britain's towns and cities could become no-go areas, where British people dare not go.

Those who claim otherwise should hang their heads in shame were they able to comprehend the concept.

It is over used expression that the soldiers who fought in World War I were lions led by donkeys and in that respect very little has changed. To this day brave, handsome and achingly young men are being sent to fight and die in wars, by political leaders who are in the very process of betraying them and giving away their country as they die.

That is without question how those young British soldiers who fought for their country and those young Australians who fought for the mother country in the World Wars would see what is happening. It is a mercy they could not see the future and did not know that their deaths may well have been in vain, or that their counties, for Australia is doing the same, would one day betray them.

Within less than fifty years from now the descendants of those British and Australian soldiers who fought in the great world wars of the twentieth Century will be an ethnic minority in the homelands they fought for. If that is not betrayal, then nothing is betrayal.

Enrichment of Europe continues - More Muslim riots in France

The enrichment of Europe continues - More Muslim riots in France

Sarah maid of Albion 

The BBC, of course only refer to "rioters" and cleverly show film of white bystanders watching what is going on, however, reports from elsewhere in the world give a more truthful picture.

Of course, this isn't really news, when are Muslims not rioting in what's left of France?

UPDATE

Further information at Atlas Shrugs

Mass Immigration? Blame Whitey, Says Conservative Minister

Mass Immigration? Blame Whitey, Says Tory Minister

From the BNP News Room

British people are to blame for mass immigration because they are too lazy to work, Conservative Party immigration minister Damian Green has said.

The shocking attack on British people, which is perfectly in line with the establishment’s classic “blame whitey” tactic, was made by Mr Green in a column in a daily newspaper.

The allegation that there are jobs which British people refuse to do is simply a lie, and to make matters worse, Mr Green knows this to be the case.

Firstly, Mr Green would know that there is a significant gap between the employment rates of indigenous British people and immigrant-descended populations.

Secondly, the real reason why employers “prefer” to give jobs to immigrants is that they can pay them less and can avoid any sort of legal obligation in terms of tax, national insurance contributions and employment contracts.

According to figures released by the Office for National Statistics, unemployment varies greatly amongst racial groups in Britain.

The ONS says that the average unemployment rate by ethnic group in Britain is as follows: White 4 percent; Pakistani 16 percent; Bangladeshi 22 percent; Black Caribbean 12 percent; Indian 7 percent; and Chinese 6 percent (Official for National Statistics, Annual Local Area Labour Force Survey).

Once this racial disparity is factored in, Mr Green’s attack on British people takes on an ominous meaning.

Furthermore, if Mr Green was really concerned about addressing unemployment levels, he would take legislative steps against employers who are dodging legal obligations by paying “cheap” immigrant workers.

The reality is that instead of beefing up border security and the underfunded UK Border Agency, the ConDem regime would rather spend billions on the Afghanistan war and foreign aid.

* According to official figures, the unemployment rate as of 14 July 2010 was 7.8 percent with International Labour Organisation (ILO)-defined unemployment for March to May at 2.47 million people.

In addition, a new poll revealed that the number of applications for every graduate vacancy has surged to nearly 70 while the number of available positions is predicted to fall by nearly 7 percent.

For the fourth year in a row, demand for university places has hit a record high.

At the end of May, there were over 640,000 applications for places this autumn, an increase of nearly 14 percent on last year.

use this link to join the British National party Click to Join

'Equalities Commission' and their cohorts launch another all out attack on the BNP.

'Equalities Commission' and their cohorts launch another all out attack to utterly destroy the BNP. We must fight this political harassment! WE ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR VERY SURVIVAL!! Fellow British Patriot, As our enemies gather to plot our downfall, they would do well to remember that for thousands of years the British people have defended these Isles, our blood and all that we love and hold dear. Millions of our ancestors have died defending the right of our people to exist under our own traditions in our own homeland, and to hand on to our future generations the sacred soil of our island home. A few days ago, the British National Party was in court AGAIN with the twisted leftwing fanatics of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. Once again, this sinister body is using TAXPAYERS' money to try to cripple Britain's only real opposition party. Make no mistake, people like Trevor Phillips and the EHRC's legal director John Wadham are slippery players. Whilst at first they demanded that I and deputy leader, Simon Darby be jailed, they now seem to be backpedalling. In the face of a clearly well-prepared BNP defence strategy, and perhaps now realising the backlash jailing the leader of the British National Party would create, they have now switched to demanding the 'sequestration' (i.e. seizure) of the party's assets. THEY INTEND TO UTTERLY DESTROY US! There are two crucial points to grasp here: First, this is not a criminal hearing, subject to high levels of evidence; this is now a civil action. It's not a matter of right and justice, it's about a Marxist immigrant and his cronies using taxpayers' money to abuse the legal system in order to persecute the British National Party. Second, the ECHR's seventy taxpayer-funded lawyers know full well that their allegations that we are in contempt are extremely weak, being based on their own bigoted and highly suspect reading of the law. So provided we can AFFORD to keep up the legal fight, they face an uphill struggle even to get the judgement they seek. Even more important, they know that the BNP's new constitution was designed precisely to deal with this kind of totally unjust and malicious attack. Fortunately, we can win this case but we have no time to waste. So the 'threat' of sequestration is in reality merely the ECHR's reaction to their belated realisation that I am willing to go to prison. So now they are trying to save face and to bleed us dry of funds. Meanwhile, we are in the final stages of working out a separate series of legal counter-attacks against the Equality Commissars. More news of this will appear on our website and be sent to you shortly. So Round Two of this fight has begun. It will be a fight that will be waged with several things: determination, funds and tenacity. Determination and tenacity are not in short supply, funds are! Our enemies should know from my years as leader of the BNP that I will NEVER give in, EVER! Have you wondered why they have launched this fresh assault now? It's because they know that our party war chest is low after the election! It is time to rise up again and swing into action, and donations are URGENTLY needed, that's the bottom line. I am the leader of this party and thus I am responsible for its future, so I need to tell you: WE NEED YOUR DONATIONS URGENTLY! The situation is serious and without your continued loyalty and generosity, we will be unable to keep our legal team in the field over the crucial weeks ahead. Properly funded, this is a fight we can win, but it is also one we could lose for lack of funds to pay for our legal ammunition. We have two options: 1) sit and let them win judgement on a technicality and cripple us with costs, or 2) summon our British spirit once again and fight like lions in the proud tradition of our hero ancestors. I have chosen option 2 and will fight tooth and nail for all our futures! Remember our heroes of old At Waterloo, Trafalgar, Rorke's Drift, the Somme, Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, D-Day and the Falklands, men and women of our blood have triumphed against staggering odds to defend our proud nation. But now, in the England of 2010, even OUR soldiers are abused and attacked on OUR very own streets! WHAT OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WOULD EVER ALLOW SUCH AN OUTRAGE? Did you see those disgusting scenes when fanatical Muslim mobs abused our brave boys on the streets of London? WHAT A DISGRACE! The same day, two members of the 1st Battalion, The Duke of Lancaster's Regiment were shot dead in Afghanistan. More die almost every day - and the Islamists gloat! These Muslim fanatics are trampling on the graves of our glorious dead. IT IS TIME THEY WERE STOPPED! I say: THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT! When our enemies are strong enough the real horrors will unfold! Immigration, multiculturalism and PC fanatics are destroying the Britain we all love and cherish. Our children have no future in this country and face becoming a despised, oppressed and abused (literally, in the case of our girls) minority in their own homeland. Only the BNP can stop this, that's why the 'Equalities Commission' is trying so hard to destroy us! We have lived in these islands for thousands of years, but now we will lose EVERYTHING unless we recover our British backbone and take our country back! We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to save our country - but I need YOUR help to secure our children's future! >> Click Here to Make a Donation >> or ring 0207 078 3269 We are on borrowed time, we must act now! Or our children and our nation will perish! Today, I am asking you to help the British National Party in our epic battle against injustice. We require high-powered advice to survive this onslaught and as you know, that's not cheap, but I know you appreciate the level of threat against us right now and the real danger we currently face. We must do all we can to protect this party's future, because without us, the British people will be left voiceless. If you care about your country, your heritage, your ancestors and your children, then now is the time to leap into the crucible and join the struggle to save our party, nation and heritage! I have such tremendous faith in the indomitable spirit of the British people and have no doubt whatsoever that we will triumph against the forces destroying our country in the end. Today you can help the British Resistance by donating anything you can afford to our struggle! >> Click Here to Make a Donation >> or ring 0207 078 3269 The 'Equalities Commission' (ECHR) are at this very moment poised to destroy this party... THEY ARE DEADLY SERIOUS! They and their political masters are already celebrating the demise of the BNP. They think we're on the ropes, backed into a corner. Maybe we are? But now we're coming out FIGHTING! These traitors forgot one very important thing; WE ARE BRITISH, AND WE DON'T LIE DOWN TO BULLIES..EVER! The blood in our veins is that which coursed through our forefathers at Agincourt, the Somme, and Dunkirk. Just as true patriots rallied to the cause to save our boys from annihilation on the beaches of Dunkirk, I am asking you to rally behind me and this party as we go into battle over the next few weeks to fight for our very survival. We need to fight and we need to win. Will you help me to defend our rights? Will you help light the torch of bold defiance and liberty? The Equalities Commission are trying to bankrupt us; it's as simple as that. You can thwart their evil plan by backing this party and our fight for freedom financially. Your cheques, postal orders and credit card donations are the weapons these traitors fear most. Your indomitable spirit and kindness in giving generously to preserve all that we all hold dear, can and will destroy their wicked plans to destroy first, the BNP, then every last vestige of Britishness they can. >> Click Here to Make a Donation >> or ring 0207 078 3269 We are fighting for the very survival of this party. What you do now will have implications for generations to come; your actions now may well mean the difference between victory and defeat for this party. We are not only fighting for ourselves, we are fighting to ensure our children and grandchildren still have a country to call their own. The weight of history rests upon OUR shoulders today. What will future generations say of our actions? Nobody wanted this fight except our enemies, now we have it, let's turn it to our advantage! Would it be possible for you to consider a gift of £1,000? If not, would a gift of £500 be within your reach? We are earnestly hoping that you dig deep and make the biggest sacrifice you can. I am counting on a few large gifts but I am also depending on a multitude of gifts of £25, £35, £50, £100 and £200. Please send whatever you can, straight away. I need an urgent response to this letter! Every day lost in launching our legal fight back will cost us dear. I urge you to respond, TODAY. Right now I need you to join me on the front lines, because we WILL win this battle; our children's futures are at stake. As Winston Churchill said: "We will defend our island no matter what the cost may be… we will NEVER surrender!" Please tell me that I can count on your support and action at this crucial time: >> Click Here to Make a Donation >> or ring 0207 078 3269 Yours sincerely Nick Griffin MEP Chairman, BNP PS: We need to raise this money in the next week to make the necessary arrangements to defend our party. I can't think of a better gift to give our children and grandchildren than the legacy of a strong British National Party insuring our British freedoms, Christian culture and way of life are protected and cherished. The so-called 'Equalities Commission' and the other traitors hope that you will set this letter aside and forget about it - that's why I hope that you will send your most generous gift right away. >> FORWARD TO A FRIEND >>

BNP eNews options: > Click here to SIGN-UP to BNP eNews > Click here to FORWARD to a friend > Click here to visit the BNP website > Click here to JOIN the BNP © British National Party 2009. PO Box 14, Welshpool, SY21 0WE

Afghanistan War Death Toll Climbs Again as ConDem Announces 40% Increase in Foreign Aid to Afghanistan

Afghanistan War Death Toll Climbs Again as ConDem Regime Announces 40% Increase in Foreign Aid

From the BNP Newsroom

The horrific death toll of British troops in the unwinnable and probably illegal war in Afghanistan rose to 322 today as the ConDem government  announced that even more of your tax money will now be spent in that country.

Another four British soldiers have died needlessly in Helmand province over the last 24 hours. In what is widely seen as a serious escalation, two soldiers were killed on Friday and another two on Saturday, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has announced.

At least one soldier was killed while trying to dispose of a roadside bomb in southern Nahr-e Saraj.

Last year, the MoD announced that “most” parts of the trigger mechanisms for roadside bombs in Afghanistan were electronic components and mobile telephones purchased in Britain by Islamist supporters.

These goods are legally exported to Pakistan, the MoD said. From there, they are adapted and smuggled across the border into Afghanistan for use against British troops, the MoD said.

The treacherous nature of the war was illustrated last week with the attack by a supposedly “loyal” member of the Afghanistan’s army on sleeping British soldiers.

This cowardly assault saw another four of our brave young men killed, for no reason at all except to satisfy the criminally insane warmongers in London and Washington.

To add insult to injury, the ConDem regime yesterday announced a 40 percent increase in foreign aid to Afghanistan.

Tory International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell declared that his “number one priority” is to “secure progress” in Afghanistan.

Justifying the massive increase in aid, Mr Mitchell repeated the hoary old lie that Britain is involved in the war to “prevent the Afghan territory from again being used by al Qaida as a base from which to plan attacks on the UK and our allies.”

This outrageous lie has been dismissed by military commanders, defence experts and the only party in Britain to tell the truth about this tragic war, the British National Party.

The reality is exactly opposite to what the liar Mr Mitchell alleges: in fact, the war in Afghanistan has served to increase terrorism in Britain and the world, not the other way round.

The BNP is the only political party to demand an immediate end to this war and the institution of sensible domestic immigration policies to remove the Islamist threat at home.

join the Fightback join the British National Party  https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html