Politicaly Correct Police still going easy on Muslim 'grooming' gangs

Police still going easy on Muslim 'grooming' gangs

  Martin Wingfield  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 DECEMBER 2010: 
ONE of the recurring themes of letters to Nick Griffin's Constituency Office concerns the 'grooming' young British girls by Muslim men.

 Ever since the British National Party's famous General Election broadcast on grooming - with Channel 4's ridiculous censorship only helping to highlight the subject - Nick Griffin has been seen as the only elected politician prepared to tackle issue.

Yet another letter on grooming arrived last week and this is what a distraught mother had to say: 

"I have four teenage daughters and we were the only white family in around neighbouring seven streets. 

I have always regarded myself as open-minded and have even been a defender of the Muslim community, but now my opinion has changed 

We were all, myself included, targeted by Muslim men of all ages, but mostly groups of young men, in cars and asked for sex. The first time we called the police, and the second. My 14 year old was stopped while on her way to school at 8.30 cutting through the car park of our local hospital, and we called the police. We were told there was not enough evidence and no crime had been committed even though she took the car number on her phone. 

On one occasion my 19 year old had her younger brother and two younger cousin at the park on a Saturday afternoon. She looks very young and could then have been mistaken for 14 or 15, she was approached for sex by a group of Muslim men, she told them to go away and one produced a knife. She called the police and when they arrived she pointed out the group. They had no fear and did not go to run off they were so sure of themselves. The park was full at the time and she felt it safer to stay near a crowd. The police went to them and talked to them then came back. The group denied having a knife and said that my daughter and the boys had been calling them racist name. They did not search them, just walked my daughter home. 

Now we have been forced to move from our home and the town where our families have their roots, because the authorities refuse to believe what is happening. No politician wants to know, they just try to claim that it is just young Muslims being led on by out-of-control girls. 

These men are not just looking for sex that they cannot get in there own community. It is their complete lack of respect for non-Muslim women leads them to treat White girls this way." 

Responding on behalf of Nick Griffin, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield wrote:

"Thank you for your correspondence regarding sexual grooming and Muslim gangs.

I am sorry to hear that your family has been targeted by local gangs, and that the police have failed consistently to investigate your complaints sufficiently.

This is an increasing problem in some areas and all too often the police choose to "turn a blind eye" to sexual grooming crimes - in the interests of protecting community harmony.

Mr Griffin and the British National Party have been campaigning over many years to highlight this issue, and to persuade the police and criminal justice agencies to recognise and confront the problem.

The police seem, however, to be totally cowed by political correctness and are reluctant to take the necessary measures to stop this organised abuse. Their inaction, unfortunately, leaves young and vulnerable white girls exposed to gangs of Muslim youths who evidently have little fear of the law. There are so few prosecutions actually pursued against the perpetrators of grooming offences, that there is effectively no deterrent in force.

Please be assured that Mr Griffin will continue to apply pressure on the police and criminal justice system until they recognise their responsibility to see that justice is effectively served; and appreciate that the interests of public protection must always outweigh concerns about community sensitivities."

A Blog for British Nationalism: More about multiculturalism

More about Multiculturalism 

Whatever we are told by the mass media, there is nothing wrong with wanting Britain to remain an ethnically British country. Wanting to live in a country with your racial brethren is as natural as wanting to live in a home with your own family, and no amount of multiracial propaganda is going to change that. In the last ten years, approximately 600,000 White people have left multiracial London for somewhere Whiter. The simple truth is that different races do not wish to live together – they never have done; they never will do.

There are probably a few individuals who would be perfectly happy if they were the only white person left in the whole country – but the majority do not feel that way. After Enoch Powell gave his famous 'Rivers of Blood' speech on immigration and race in 1968, 74% of the population agreed with his views – yet he was still removed from Heath’s shadow cabinet. Politicians have transformed our country against the wishes of the people. We were never asked whether we wanted to turn Britain into a multiracial country, and if we had been asked, we would have said no.

In London, one in four schoolchildren do not speak English as their first language. ‘Red Ken’ may be saying that this is what makes London such a great city, but who wants to send their child to a school filled with asylum seekers who cannot even speak English? Certainly not the wealthy middle class ‘liberals’ who, despite paying lip service to the idea of multiculturalism, almost always live as far away from our ‘vibrant’ and ‘enriched’ inner cities as possible. Invariably, those who lecture us all on the meaning and significance of race and the ‘benefits’ of multiculturalism are those who live furthest away from those multicultural parts of the country on which they lavish so much praise.

‘Race means nothing’

There are some who claim that race doesn't even exist, and that ‘skin colour is the only difference’. I have very little interest in science (and don’t consider scientific arguments for racial awareness to be the most effective), so I won't go into detail about racial differences here, but it's a fact that a DNA test can identify someone's race quite easily.

If there aren't average differences between the races, what explains Black athletic success? Why do Aborigine Australians generally have the best eyesight even when bought up in westernised homes? Why is it that Blacks have higher levels or testosterone? Why are Black babies born an average of one week earlier than white babies? Why do Black people have quicker reflexes? Why do Blacks have larger sex organs? Why are Black people at a much higher risk at getting AIDS? Why do Black children reach puberty earlier? Why is it that Black children start walking at 11 months, white children at 12 months, Orientals 13 months? Why is it that different races react differently to alcohol? Why have personality tests consistently found that Orientals are more cautious and less aggressive than other races? Why is the Black illegitimacy rate so high? Why is it, for example, that individuals whose ancestors evolved in South Asia but who were themselves born in the UK have a 40% higher risk of coronary heart disease and diabetes than do whites? Why is it that Oriental Asians have an average IQ of 106, Whites of 100, Southern Asians of slightly less than Whites, and Blacks of less than 88 in Britain? (See Race, Behavior and Evolution by J.P. Rushton)

Football

It is claimed that our football team would be much worse if not for our Black players. This is probably true - although we never seem to win anything anyway, and the one time that we have won something (1966) we had an all-White team. But I think it’s ironic that those who say that having black players improve our football team - surely an admission that black people have a genetic advantage in competitive sports such as football - are often the same type of people who claim that race doesn’t even exist. And why is it that multiculturalists always point out the racial composition of our sports team if it is multiracial, but are silent if it is not?

To be honest, I dislike the fact that Black people can represent my country in sport. It's not that I dislike Blacks or anyone else, but what is the point in a national team if we are represented by people who clearly aren’t English? Although, I can assure any Searchlight readers that I have no problem with David Beckham or Wayne Rooney being in the team!

Cuisine

Another argument for non-White immigration is that we now – thanks to ‘diversity’ - have many different types of restaurants. But it’s not much of a consolation when you consider that Whites will be a minority in Britain within my lifetime. If Tony Blair was to say 'Yes, we are going to flood Britain with asylum seekers, but don’t worry because you might get a few new restaurants if you’re lucky', nobody would welcome it. That’s why, when politicians talk about immigration, they usually tell us about the ‘need for control’, rather than explain why they’ve already bought in millions of people from the third world, and why they intend to continue to do so (albeit with some sort of ‘control’ to prevent the natives waking up and realising what’s really going on). Even Ken Livingstone wouldn’t consider getting an authentic Indian restaurant in every town a government priority. Anyway, we had Indian restaurants in Victorian times, and our population wasn't very ‘diverse’ back then. And surely we’ve got enough restaurants already; we don't need any more, thank you.

Problems with ‘diversity’

Mono-racial nations, such as Iceland (which is 98% Icelandic), do not have the problems that we have. They don't have racist attacks, they don't have race riots or suicide bombings, they don't need positive discrimination, they don't need a Commission for Racial Equality, they don’t need their lottery money to be spent on projects promoting 'diversity' in hope of getting the races to get along with each other, they don't need anti-free speech race-hate laws, they don't need ID cards to stop illegal immigration and diffuse the terrorist threat, because they have a homogeneous population. 'Diversity' is not a strength of Britain, but homogeneity is certainly a strength of Iceland.

One last point: Given that Asian and African nations are far poorer than we are, and need far more help than we do, if immigrants are really doing such wonderful things for Britain, as the advocates of white dispossession (or 'multiculturalism', as they call it) insist they are, wouldn’t it be better if they would all return to their native lands and do wonderful things for their own people? Africa needs doctors and teachers far more desperately than we do, yet it is often so-called 'anti-racists' who are suggesting that we should have the right to steal them. I believe that all people should strive to improve their own country rather that emigrating to find an easier life.

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Half of Germans want to axe the euro

Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Half of Germans want to axe the euro: "-

HALF OF GERMANS WANT TO AXE THE EURO

49 per cent of ­Germans still wish they had the mighty Deutchmark

Tuesday Decem

Have your say(13)

HALF of all Germans want to ditch the euro and bring back their deutschmark, according to a poll.

Despite a year of prop­aganda from their government informing them that the beleaguered European currency is good for them, 49 per cent of ­Germans still wish they had the mighty mark in their pockets.

This is one of the highest proportions of Germans wanting its return since polls in the 1990s showed close to 70 per cent of them wanted to retain the mark, the currency of their “economic miracle”.

DAILY EXPRESS CRUSADE: GET US OUT OF EUROPE

The recent crises in Greece and Ireland have contributed to further disillusion.

In the survey for the daily Bild newspaper, only 41 per cent of people were satisfied with the euro. Most of the rest said they did not know what to think.

The survey found that the majority of Germans are ­worried about the stability of the currency and the ­possibility of inflation.

Three-quarters of the ­people questioned by YouGov said they personally had not profited from the adoption of the euro.

And if Germany was not part of the eurozone, only 30 per cent of those asked would today vote to adopt the euro and 60 per cent would vote against it.

Yet despite the concerns, the majority believe the euro is here to stay.

Asked whether the euro would still be country’s ­currency in 20 years, 55 per cent of the respondents replied yes. Germany adopted the euro in 1999 along with 10 other countries.

Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/219745/Half-of-Germans-want-to-axe-the-euroHalf-of-Germans-want-to-axe-the-euro#ixzz19Pv4cqIe

YouTube - BNP Haters Beware, We Are The British (Vote BNP ✔ 2015)

YouTube - BNP Haters Beware, We Are The British (Vote BNP ✔ 2015):

The Beginnings

The Beginnings: "
December 2010 11:13

The year 2010 is almost over and soon we will be marching into 2011, a year that I think will probably be the most important one ever for the fate of the British People, Western Civilisation and the British National Party.

In 2011 the enemies of Western Civilisation, who seek the destruction of the True British People, in fact the genocide of the white race, will increase their efforts to destroy the British National Party. Life for their brave activists will become very difficult I believe and no doubt this site will take its share of stick from the evil creatures who seek to destroy the patriots of this Disunited Kingdom.

This site in 2011, intends to work flat out to spread the truth, attempt to awaken our sleeping brothers and sisters, whilst constantly attacking the enemies of Freedom of Speech and Democracy. The site will pull no punches and if I stay out of prison it will be a miracle.

Aware of how energy and time draining the coming battles in 2011 are going to be, this site will not be posting any articles until the start of the new year, as I wish to put my personal life in order, spend some time with friends and family and generally rest and recuperate ready to be as mentally fresh as possible for an all out effort between January and May prior to the Welsh and Scottish Elections.

I suggest those not involved in the Oldham elections prepare in a similar manner and just enjoy what might be your last week of peace for a very long time.

Here is a poem by Rudyard Kipling that has been requested (constantly lol) by a very good friend of mine.

Hate is a terrible word but it was the Establishment that have made us learn it - make them pay and use it against them.

The Beginnings

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.

Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

Good Luck for the New Year British National Party, I for one believe in you

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » The Archbishop of Canterbury and Victorian values

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » The Archbishop of Canterbury and Victorian values: "
As predictable as the bells pealing out the ­arrival of Christmas, the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams has once again managed to mark the festive ­season by a display of painful moral confusion.

First, he used his sermon at Canterbury Cathedral to rebuke the most prosperous for having yet to ­shoulder their load in the economic downturn.

And then in an article for yesterday’s Mail on Sunday he wrote that the poor should be absolved of any responsibility for their own circumstances.

True, he acknowledged that there were doubtless ‘some who make the most out of the benefits ­culture’ — although even here he couldn’t resist a swipe at ‘some who have made the most out of other kinds of perks available to bankers or MPs’.

But he warned: ‘The Victorian distinction between the deserving poor and the rest is very seductive.’

And he added: ‘Even if there are those who are where they are because of their own bad or foolish choices in the past, that doesn’t mean they are any less in need in the present. And it can’t be said often enough that most people in poverty — and we should be thinking of children in particular — haven’t chosen it.’

This was an extraordinary thing to say. It means that even if poor people are dishonest or irresponsible, the rest of society must regard them as just as deserving of society’s largesse as the honest poor.

But the notion that those who have behaved immorally or irresponsibly should be treated in exactly the same way as those whose behaviour has been irreproachable is itself profoundly amoral.

Of course, no one chooses to be poor. But some people do choose lifestyles that cause them to become poor — such as choosing not to work, or deciding to bring up children on their own.

And what was so disturbing about Dr Williams’s observation was that he seemed to be negating the importance of such choices.

Indeed, by demonising the better-off while investing the poor with a halo, he came close to suggesting that wealth — however honestly or arduously earned — is intrinsically evil, while poverty is a holy state.

His core point was that no distinction should be made between the ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor — which to him clearly conjures up Dickensian nightmares of workhouses, cruelty and destitution.

This distinction was, indeed, a key concept in Victorian times. However, after the development of the Welfare State, the idea that any poor people could be considered ­‘undeserving’ was ruled out of court.

Contrary to the beliefs of the founder of the Welfare State himself, William Beveridge, it became the accepted view that it was odious to hold any poor people responsible for their own poverty. The question of individual behaviour and its consequences was airbrushed out of the welfare picture altogether.

This was in large measure because Left-wing thinking — in the famous aphorism — replaced Methodism with Marx. And Marxist analysis holds that people are not responsible for their own circumstances, but are instead helpless tools of the capitalist system.

Obviously, many do become poor through cruel twists of fate. But others certainly ­contribute to their poverty through their own behaviour.

For example, many women choosing to have babies without a permanently committed father on board doom themselves and their children to poverty and a host of other terrible disadvantages.

Of course, some lone mothers are the innocent victims of desertion. But it is crucial to offer all poor people assistance which will give them a leg up and out of poverty rather than kick away the ladder of opportunity from beneath their feet.

Yet leaving them stranded with no escape route is precisely what the ‘non- judgmental’ view of poverty represented by Dr Williams has brought about.

Which is precisely the woeful state of affairs that the Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is determined to end.

True, Dr Williams paid dutiful credit to the Government’s welfare reforms for its ‘clear intention to put things in place that will actually reduce poverty and help people out of the traps of dependency’.

But clearly, he simply doesn’t understand that this depends to a large extent upon restoring the distinction between the ­‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor that he finds so abhorrent.

That is because it is not motivated by an absence of compassion, as he implies, but by its precise opposite — a deeply principled desire to end the trap of permanent poverty. And the way to do that is encourage behaviour that will end it, through viewing the poor as governed by the same impulses as everyone else.

Dr Williams’s view, however, effectively treats the poor as less than human. The essence of being human, after all, is to be capable of moral choice. And all of us, rich and poor, are capable of making those choices.

The choice to be honest rather than fiddling the benefits system. To work, however demeaning the job, in preference to taking state charity. To bring children into the world only where there is a committed father to help bring them up.

But if people who make immoral — or amoral —choices benefit from these, that creates a fundamental injustice throughout society. For there is no surer way of undermining and demoralising those who refuse to cheat the system or who are living lives of self-restraint and responsibility.

Yet that is precisely what our non-judgmental culture of dependency has given us — the moral degradation of an entire society.

You might think that the Church of all institutions would be in the forefront of ­fighting such cultural collapse. So why does Dr Williams put himself on the wrong side of the moral tracks?

Well, his disapproving reference to the ­Victorians is more than a little revealing.

For during that period, it was Christians who spearheaded the great social reform movements which turned Britain from a society riven by crime, illegitimacy and drunken squalor into a tranquil country in which the traditional family was the crucible of social order.

That transformation came about through a profoundly moral view of the world rooted in a muscular Christianity. This upheld the dignity of every human being and the optimistic belief that people could redeem themselves through their own behaviour.

It was these Christian attitudes that led to the abolition of slavery and a host of other reforms. Yet Dr Williams has in the past ­apologised for the role of the church during this period, radiating deep embarrassment about religious impulses which once were a synonym for progressive attitudes.

This is rooted in a collapse of religious belief within the Church of England which has been going on for decades. Accordingly, it has steadily eroded its commitment to the moral codes embodied in the Bible and embraced instead the secular alternative – the religion of Left-wing ideology.

Thus Sunday school was replaced by social work, morality by expediency and holy war by class war.

Dr Williams undoubtedly wants to do good in the world. And he is far from being a ­stupid man; he is considered to be a profound thinker and theologian.

But it took Iain Duncan Smith, in the striking article he wrote for this paper last week, to use without embarrassment the Biblical figure of Joseph to illustrate one of the key antidotes to permanent poverty — the committed father.

The fact is that what Mr Duncan Smith is doing embodies Christian conscience in a way that appears completely to elude the leader of the Anglican communion.

When a politician boldly links morality, religion and compassion while a religious leader can only spout Left-wing cliches, a society’s foundations have become shaky indeed.

CON/DEM BRITISH GOVERNMENTS FOREIGN AID BILL ROCKETS TO £753M 

BRITAIN’S foreign aid bill has soared to a staggering £753million – four times more than the rise in any other country.

Newly-available figures for the huge cost of the UK’s humanitarian contributions are set to cause outrage as Britons face having to swallow the biggest spending cuts since the Second World War.

And they come as British taxpayers are to be made to shell out tens of millions more to bail out a major UN disaster fund, let down by other nations.

The UK’s humanitarian aid expenditure rose by a massive £100million in 2009, according to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

The size of Britain’s aid contributions compared to those of other developed nations has infuriated the British People 

People will rightly  are unable to grasp the concept of why our aid contributions are much, much higher than other nations.
The out of touch Government is keen to tell us that we have no money to spend on those British people in most need and yet  they see fit to up our foreign aid contributions to corrupt dictatorships and countries who like nothing more than to see the British people destroyed.

Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and the volatile African countries of Somalia, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo were the biggest beneficiaries of the UK’s aid programme. Also The aid increase figures come as it emerged that Britain will also contribute millions more to the UN’s international central emergency response fund because other nations have failed to abide by their commitments to help those caught up in natural disasters.

The scheme is facing a £65million shortfall in 2011 and Britain will contribute an additional £40million to help make up the difference, as well as pumping Billions into the failed EU, whilst millions of Britons suffer under excessive taxes and the sick and elderly do without.

Remember! Only the British National Party is committed to ending this fraud

 

 

Positive action discriminates against the British white community

Positive action discriminates against the white community

Martin Wingfield  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 DECEMBER 2010: 
Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority have published the consultation document to its draft Corporate Plan 2011-14 and is asking the region's elected representatives, including the North West MEPs, for feedback.


 After lengthy discussions with Nick Griffin over the contents of the document, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield, has submitted the following response.
"Mr Griffin has asked me to reply to you on his behalf.
Firstly, he offers his sincere thanks to the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) for the excellent work it undertakes in preventing and responding to emergencies. Based on the correspondence he receives from his constituents in the Greater Manchester area, it is clear that the service provided is extremely valued and the dedication of your personnel very much appreciated.
The Corporate Plan is an extensive and informative document which will be very helpful to anyone with an interest in the work of the Fire Service, especially in the current economic climate, with public concern about potential public sector “cutbacks” at an all-time high, and it is commendable that the GMFRS has taken the time to outline its strategy for the next four years.
It is evident that the authors of the Plan have endeavoured to conform to the anticipated requirements of the new Coalition Government; with the emphasis placed on proposing a way forward which “strikes a balance between managing risk and managing resources” and this gives some cause for concern. With reference, again, to the correspondence received from Mr Griffin’s constituents, I would be grateful if you could clarify a few points which arise from the Plan.
· It is quite correct that the GMFRS should be committed to delivering an integrated, locally managed service. Common sense dictates that local knowledge is crucial in determining an effective and timely front-line response to local emergencies. How can this commitment to localism be achieved however, if the Greater Manchester Fire Service’s own Control Room is to be replaced in 2012 with a Regional Control Centre (based in Warrington), which will serve all five Fire and Rescue Services in the North West: Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Lancashire, Cheshire and Cumbria? Mr Griffin has spoken to staff in some of the Service Control Rooms and they are deeply concerned that the move to a centralized regional control facility will result in unnecessary and preventable delays in dispatching fire crews to emergency situations.
· Given that the GMFRS has over recent years “delivered the highest efficiency savings figure within English Fire and Rescue Services” by driving down demand and investing savings where possible in preventative community safety initiatives, how can the Service achieve the significant budget reductions (25% of the current grant) demanded by the Coalition Government? If the Service has already been cut to the bone, and the reduction in the central grant cannot be counterbalanced through a council tax increase, where are the £19 million savings to be found? The new crewing approach - “optimum crewing” - raises particular concerns, given that this means essentially that there will be “less employees overall, with everyone doing more” and “involves taking some of [the] appliances/personnel on and off line on different days and at different times.” Mr Griffin’s constituents fear that front-line services will be undermined by these personnel, infrastructure and equipment cuts.
· Can you please confirm whether the Service’s commitment to provide "equitable service delivery by a workforce that is representative of the communities it serves" involves a policy of positive discrimination in terms of personnel recruitment? Mr Griffin has received a substantial post-bag from North West constituents keen to join the fire service who have attended recruitment open-evenings, only to be told they would not be considered because the recruitment drive was targeting "the ethnic minority communities" in order to equalise community representation within the Service. Positive action in favour of particular community groups must necessarily have a negative impact on others, and Mr Griffin’s constituents fear that it will be the majority white community that is discriminated against if a "positive" discrimination recruitment policy is adopted by the GMFRS.
· Finally, it is noted in the Plan that “the risk of terrorist incidents in the future is uncertain, but the need and expectation to be prepared remains high and there will remain a need to be able to deploy large numbers of appliances and personnel from time to time.” In light of the fact that the bomb attacks in London on 7/7 were carried out by home-grown, British Muslim extremists, coupled with the fact that Greater Manchester has “some of the country’s most vibrant communities”, do you consider it will be feasible to provide sufficient cover for this potential terrorism risk within the severe resource restraints now imposed on the GMFRS?
Mr Griffin will be grateful for your help in clarifying the issues of concern raised above."

'Cowardly' thugs beat up pensioner wearing RAF blazer and poppy | Mail Online

'Cowardly' thugs beat up pensioner wearing RAF blazer and poppy | Mail Online: "

• 'Blow up all soldiers' the pair shouted during attack

A former serviceman was left bloodied and bruised when two drunken thugs beat him up for wearing an RAF blazer and poppy.

Anthony O'Brien, 69, was attacked by the thugs, aged between 17 and 20, after meeting friends to plan the funeral of a former colleague.

Mr O'Brien said today that as they attacked him they shouted: 'Blow up all soldiers. F****** shoot all you b*******s - death to all soldiers.'

The pair - described as being of Asian or mixed race - then headbutted and punched him to the floor leaving him in a daze.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1341840/Cowardly-thugs-beat-pensioner-wearing-RAF-blazer-poppy.html#ixzz19MEOrPIc

Sarah Maid of Albion: Multiculturalism

Sarah Maid of Albion: Multiculturalism: "-
A Poem by Mike Wilson

Come on down you coloured folk –
We’re here to lend a hand.
We’re here to help you get a start,
In this, our own free land.

Just leave behind your petty wars
And a Muslim way of life –
Yes come on down and join the fun,
You can even bring your wife.

We’ll give you houses, jobs and cash,
We’ll give you peace of mind
And we won’t mind if you object
To how we live our lives.

Your women can be covered up
From head to foot, it’s true.
We understand that you must live
As all good Sharia’s do.

We don’t care that you hate us folk,
No we don’t care that it’s true –
We only want to show you love
As all good Christians do!

Our Christian culture is our own
But you must have one too
So we will stop our Christmasses
So you can feel ‘True Blue’.

As Christians all we understand
That we must love all men.
So come on down and bring your creed
And religious intolerance too.

Bishop of Winchester: legal system discriminates against Christians - Telegraph

Bishop of Winchester: legal system discriminates against Christians - Telegraph: "

The Human Rights Act is protecting the rights of minority groups while encouraging judges and politicians to discriminate against Christians, a senior bishop said yesterday.

What's the value of immigration? - CNN.com

What's the value of immigration? - CNN.com: "-Washington (CNN) -- Senators are a lot like college students. For months on end, they seem to do no work at all. And then everything gets crammed into the last weekend of the term.

Christmas: A Holiday to Love and Preserve in Horwich

Christmas: A Holiday to Love and Preserve

  By  Nick Griffin MEP

Dear friend and fellow patriot,

Once upon a time, not all that long ago, the word “Christmas” was all around us during the month of December. Everywhere you looked — in shops, town centres, cities, offices and of course in every home — there were Christmas trees, Christmas decorations, Christmas cards, Christmas presents and the great Christmas spirit which characterised our nation.

Always Winter, Never Christmas

In the popular children’s story, “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe”, an evil witch cast an enchantment over Narnia so that it was always winter but never Christmas. Similarly, today, Christmas has become a dirty word and has been replaced by “holiday” or “Winterval.” Unlike in “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe”, however, there is no evil witch cancelling Christmas. Instead, evil establishment politicians are now doing this job, and we even find schools cancelling Christmas Nativity plays for fear of offending non-Christians.

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

The War on Christmas has Begun

Christmas is under threat, in just the same way as our nation, our beliefs and our traditions are under threat. As we come under these increasing attacks, we must make the extra effort to preserve our heritage and our way of life. After all, if we do not, who will?

Pope Benedict XVI highlighted the politically correct madness of it all during his recent visit to Britain when he said:

"There are those who argue that the public celebration of festivals such as Christmas should be discouraged, in the questionable belief that it might somehow offend those of other religions or none."

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

I am ready for the fight… ARE YOU WITH ME?

The time to make our stand has come. It is time we challenged the enemies of our country and our traditions head on. I need your help to do this!

So let’s fight back against the war on Christmas. A gift of £20, £50, £100 or even £500 will help our campaign against the Islamification of Britain and for the preservation of our culture and beliefs.

Merry Christmas.

Nick Griffin MEP

Chairman, British National Party

P.S. The best Christmas present that we can give the British people is a strong, united British National Party fighting for their interests. I need your most generous support today.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party website.

A Lesson from Bethlehem | British National Party

A Lesson from Bethlehem | British National Party: "

By using trade and commerce and 'natural migration' as an excuse, these Islamic invaders plead for tolerance and their rights when they are a minority in a Christian country.

Through an increase in their numbers, facilitated by high birthrates and increasing immigration, they quite quickly become sizeable enough in numbers to start demanding changes to the countries that they have invaded.

If those changes — and the Islamic society that they demand — are not acquired quickly enough, the Islamic terrorist element begins to force those changes.

The True Messiah A message they Want us to Forget

The True Messiah A Message they Want us to Forget

I have now consider the British National Party the only Political party that is willing to defend the Christian Heritage of this these Islands from the onslaught of the Dark Powers of the Globalists UN agenda , whom under the direction of their shadowy and secret masters are attempting to destroy the identities of our and the worlds peoples and are especially making a concerted attempt to destroy the Christian faith and it's influence on the morality of Western Civilisation.

In this video, Biblical evidence that Jesus is the Messiah is presented in multimedia format. The ancient prophecies are unravelled, particularly the prophecy in Daniel 9 on the seventy weeks which pinpoints the exact time of the Messiah's arrival on Earth. The study of this prophecy has even been cursed by some theologians who do not wish to acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah. Study the evidence revealed in this video and as always we like you make your own conclusions.
if you have enjoyed the evidence in this video at the bottom of the page please visit  http://amazingdiscoveries.org/ for more material .
   

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » Harriet Harman’s bizarre proposal

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » Harriet Harman’s bizarre proposal: "Anyone who needs to know not only why the Labour Party is currently out of power but should remain so for the foreseeable future would be ­advised to study ­recent comments by its Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman.

British National Party Television » Blog Archive » Chairman’s Christmas Message 2010

British National Party Television » Blog Archive » Chairman’s Christmas Message 2010: "-

Chairman’s Christmas Message 2010

Party Chairman Nick Griffin speaks about the key points of 2010, and also asks for us to keep an eye out for our elderly neighbours during this, the hardest winter season for decades.

Christian mental health worker may lose job over abortion advice | Christian News on Christian Today

Christian mental health worker may lose job over abortion advice | Christian News on Christian Today:
A Christian mental health worker has been suspended from her job as a psychological wellbeing practitioner after passing on a booklet to colleagues containing information about the risks associated with abortion.