Our Precarious Economic and Political Circumstance; a Summary

All Wars are Bankers' Wars: You Must Prepare to Survive - Part 3 | Mike...

Obama’s Executive Order: Immigration, Amnesty and Contradictions

David Icke: Two Hour Special Royal Political Paedophilia How the Global ...

The Duke of Marlborough Churchill's Ancestor and the 1st Zionist Traitor of that Line

Author Unknown
The Duke of Marlborough

Churchill's father, Lord Randolph, was second son of the seventh Duke of Marlborough. His ancestor, the first Duke, had risen to fame and fortune during the reign of Queen Anne. Described by one Victorian historian as notoriously fond of money, he played the decisive role in the overthrow of James II. When William of Orange landed at Torbay on 3rd November 1688, the future Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill, marched against the invader and then coolly turned his army over to him.

His conduct can easily be explained by reference to the Jewish Encyclopaedia. This work declares that John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough, was paid the then enormous sum of £6,000 a year by Solomon Medina in recognition of his many services. As the Jew's chosen candidate to replace James II on the throne, the Dutchman William of Orange was paid in the form of a 'loan' of two million Dutch guilders by the Jewish merchant, Antonio Lopez Suasso, to take him across the Channel. Although this has been kept out of the history books, it can be seen that Jewish money-changers were the real power behind the scenes controlling events. As pointed out, for valuable services rendered, William allowed the Jews to establish their misnamed 'Bank of England', which effectively gave them control over the country's affairs.

Thus was instituted the National Debt and the conversion of the English into tax and debt slaves.

There is no doubt that John Churchill was a very capable general but he was also extremely perfidious. For his great victories against the French at Blenheim, Ramillies and Malplaquet he was voted an enormous sum of money by Parliament, which enabled him to build the magnificent Blenheim Palace at Woodstock. He was a mercenary who sold himself to the highest bidder. After betraying James II he began to write letters to him declaring that the time would soon come when he could return to England. Arnold Foster, in his book A History of England, wrote:-

'For it is certain that on a later occasion he actually went so far as to inform the French of an intended English expedition against Brest, and the information which he gave helped to bring about the defeat of the English and caused the loss of hundreds of English lives. When Marlborough's treachery was discovered, he and his wife were disgraced and dismissed from Court.'

So John Churchill betrayed his King and country on several occasions for money when it suited him – even to the extent of causing the deaths of hundreds of his soldiers, the very men who had brought him fame, fortune and glory. The Jews did not pay him £6,000 a year for nothing.

On 21 June 1940 R. V. Jones briefed Churchill on Knickebein - a radio beam guidance system used by the Luftwaffe for bombing through cloud cover. In the resulting Battle of the Beams the British were able to 'bend the beams', influencing the drop point of German raids so that the targets were missed completely.

During a raid on Thames Haven, on 24 August, some German aircraft (one commanded by Rudolf Hallensleben who went on to win the Knights Cross for other actions) strayed over London and dropped bombs in the east and northeast parts of the city, Bethnal Green, Hackney, Islington, Tottenham, and Finchley. It is not known with certainty whether this was a navigational 'bungle' or a direct result of anti-Knickebein measures.

In any event, the incident prompted the British to mount a retaliatory raid on Berlin the next night with bombs falling in Kreuzberg and Wedding, causing 10 deaths.

here is a direct quote from Arthur "Bomber" Harris

"the aim of the Combined Bomber Offensive...should be unambiguously stated [as] the destruction of German cities, the killing of German workers, and the disruption of civilised life throughout Germany.It should be emphasized that the destruction of houses, public utilities, transport and lives, the creation of a refugee problem on an unprecedented scale, and the breakdown of morale both at home and at the battle fronts by fear of extended and intensified bombing, are accepted and intended aims of our bombing policy. They are not by-products of attempts to hit factories." Arthur Harris

Harris argued that the main objectives of night-time blanket bombing of urban areas was to undermine the morale of the civilian population (NOT TO DESTROY INDUSTRIAL TARGETS) and attacks were launched on Hamburg, Berlin, Cologne, Dresden and other German cities. This air campaign killed an estimated 600,000 civilians and destroyed or seriously damaged some six million homes. It was a highly dangerous strategy and during the war Bomber Command had 57,143 men killed.

Churchill, being an historian, became concerned about how these firestorms would be seen during the post-war period. On 28th March, 1945, Churchill wrote to Bomber Harris: “It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, should be reviewed. Otherwise we shall come into control of an utterly ruined land. We shall not, for instance, be able to get housing material out of Germany for our own needs because some temporary provision would have to be made for the Germans themselves. I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives, such as oil and communications behind the immediate battle-zone, rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction.”

The following quote by Lieutenant Ernest Fisher, of the 101st Airborne Division and former Senior Historian of the United States Army is from the book "Other Losses":

"Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually annihilated about one million men, most of them in American camps." Ernst Fisher 101st airborn Div.

The term "Eisenhower's death camps" is obviously not an official title but the term given by former US guards and german prisoners, it is estimated that 1.7 million to germans died from mistreatment toward the end of the war and immediately after it by the revenge seeking victors of all of the allied nations. It is also estimated that upwards of 7 to 9 million total germans and eastern europeans died at the end of the war and in the first year after the war due to mistreatment by the allies and the russians.

On March 10, 1945 as World War II was coming to an end, General Eisenhower signed an order creating the status of Disarmed Enemy Forces for the German Prisoners of War who would soon be surrendering to the Americans. This order was a violation of the Geneva Convention because it allowed Eisenhower to disregard the rules for the treatment of Prisoners of War. It allowed him to starve the German POWs, deny them the right to send and receive letters, and to receive Red Cross packages and packages from German civilians. All of these rights were enjoyed by the prisoners in the Nazi POW camps and even in the notorious concentration camps. Eisenhower signed this order before he had even seen the horrors of the concentration camps, which so affected him.

On May 7, 1945, the German army surrendered to General Eisenhower, who refused to shake hands with the German General, as is customary.

The neutral country of Switzerland was removed as the Protecting Power for German prisoners, which was another violation of the Geneva Convention. General George S. Patton quickly released the prisoners who had surrendered to his Third Army, but General Eisenhower held his POWs until the end of 1946, forcing them to live on starvation rations. Red Cross packages sent to the German POW camps were returned. The POW camps had no barracks or tents.The German prisoners were forced to dig holes in the ground for shelter. Even though the American army had plenty of tents, the prisoners lived for months in their holes. When it rained, the holes collapsed and the prisoners died. there is an article written by a US soldier and guard at one camp that gives details on the treatment of Germans prisoners under the care of the US and French Armies

In October, 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the U.S. army. Largely because of the "Battle of the Bulge," my training was cut short. In late March or early April, 1945, I was sent to guard a POW camp near Andernach along the Rhine. The men I guarded had no shelter and no blankets; many had no coats. They slept in the mud, wet and cold, with inadequate slit trenches for excrement. It was a cold, wet spring and their misery from exposure alone was evident. Even more shocking was to see the prisoners throwing grass and weeds into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this to help ease their hunger pains. Quickly, they grew emaciated. Dysentery raged, and soon they were sleeping in their own excrement, too weak and crowded to reach the slit trenches. Many were begging for food, sickening and dying before our eyes. We had ample food and supplies, but did nothing to help them, including no medical assistance. These prisoners, I found out, were mostly farmers and workingmen, as simple and ignorant as many of our own troops. As time went on, more of them lapsed into a zombie-like state of listlessness, while others tried to escape in a demented or suicidal fashion, running through open fields in broad daylight towards the Rhine to quench their thirst. They were mowed down. Hunger made German women more "available," but despite this, rape was prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. In particular I remember an eighteen-year old woman who had the side of her faced smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two G.I.s. Even the French complained that the rapes, looting and drunken destructiveness on the part of our troops was excessive.

Churchill the Traitor

Origional Post at Digger for Truth 

Recently declassified documents now prove beyond doubt that Winston Churchill was part of the Judeo-Masonic plot to replace Neville Chamberlain and drag us into war, selected documents from the National archives such as the 1939 MI5 file on MP Sir Archibald Maule-Ramsey and the 224 members of one important anti-war group, while the Nordic League, the Right club  and the Anglo German fellowship, also held similar numbers of important people opposed to more bankers wars.


Sir Archibald Maule-Ramsay was the main critic in the House of Commons of having Jews in the government, and in 1938 he began a campaign to have War Minister Leslie Hore-Belisha sacked, in one speech on April 27th he warned that Hore-Belisha would lead us to war with our blood brothers of the Nordic race to make way for a Bolshevised Europe, as openly wanted by Sir Herbert Morison and the Jewish pressure groups.

Sir Archibald also petitioned in the House of Commons to get Winston Churchill deselected as MP for Epping for his constant warmongering,Sir Archibald also sought direct guarantees of peace from Hitler and Mussolini, much in these documents were stolen and passed through traitor John Cairncross to the Russians for £60.

MI8 was the wireless interception section of MI5 and much of this article contains portions of its secret transcripts, and it has been said it was Sir Joseph Ball who was instrumental in exposing the bankers grip on Churchill and informed British Intel chief Vernon Kell, who agreed no war was needed on Hitlers Germany.

Admiral Sir Barry Domvile went with others direct to Germany in 1935 and oversaw and shared with Heinrich Himmler German naval proposals and warships, with combined plans to stop the Russian communists from crossing Europe which was allowed and pre-planned by Churchill at the wars end, as predicted by Sir Oswald Mosely who had huge support from all sections of British society against Jewish control, the recent attack by the Murdoch press on his son Max Mosely was in revenge for his fathers beliefs, in Jewish law revenge down to the 7th generation is permissible.

Vernon Kell and Neville Chamberlain were among those opponents murdered by Churchill, while Sir Barry Domvile was one of a group sent to prison without charge throughout the war. A senior member of M I 5 through the war named Sorrell, kept copies of the documentation of Churchill’s murders and treachery, and was one of several intel officers secretly informing the magazine Truth. An agent runner for Lord Victor Rothschild’s pro Jewish banker group named Flora Solomons confessed in an interview that war with Germany was vital to restore bankers control.

“Agent 116″ was said to be a “Mr Shipman” a Jewish entrepreneur and distantly related to the Dr Harold Shipman, which claimed he spied for the Focus Group of Jewish bankers who were promising to fund the war, MI5 records from the restricted section confirm this and that the peace group was assisted by two women secretaries Anna Wolkoff and Joan Miller, Joan Miler was another traitor to Britain and was a paid informer to the pro-war group, later in life when alone she told me she would cry over this episode in her life, her book “One Woman’s War” which is heavily edited tells of her life in intel.

Winston Churchill had a small private cinema underneath his London Office, and while he would watch films while British and German people fought for their lives, the cinema projectionist would listen to Churchill’s drunken shouts, and he would talk to Churchill secretary Patrick Kinna about the murders instigated by Churchill mentioned here.

The saying runs thus,

“Those who do not learn the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them”

Those in our parliament must be our citizens, not foreign nationals and no dual passport fudges, and we will not allow our people to be tricked into another World War.

T Stokes London.
With thanks to all those patriotic intel informants past and present

Systemic Breakdown & Economic Collapse Guaranteed | Jim Willie (Part 1)

"We’re in the End Game Now” ~ Jim Willie at his finest

The Rise And The Fall Of The Bankster (Full Movie)

PUTIN Warns Dollar Losing World Reserve Currency Status

The Last European Commission to Govern Britain - @Nigel_Farage MEP, Ukip...

Miles Franklin All Star Silver Panel Webinar

IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.

IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
By Stephen Toth

The American government have now tried to hide their aggressive expansionist policies concerning their constructing a new missile iron curtain around Russia by seemingly handing the issue over to NATO.
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.

Jim Willie Bombshell: Germany To Break Away From US/UK, Join Russia/Chin...

The Geopolitics of World War III

Radio 3Fourteen - Michael T. Griffith - The Northern War of Aggression &...

Moral Rot Of Zionist Christians

Why the national debt will never be repaid