Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Sunday, 28 August 2016
Saturday, 27 August 2016
Lord Sainsbury paid £8MILLION to help fund campaign to stop Brexit
By M Baska
The UK Government will be reconvening soon and it is pretty obvious many people are still either living in a state of complete denial, continually being arrogant Labour supporters, or haven't done their homework on the EU. Which like me some of us did.
We didn't just rely on the mainly Left Wing UK media (beginning with the BBC), telling us how wonderful Eurocrat Land is. Nor did we imagine the Daily Mail or in actual fact any newspapers would give us a fair understanding of the EU. I spent countless hours reading up on the EU; the huge USA banking interests in the EU and how these banking interests have systematically taken control of not just the EU but America as well.
As usual I have to remind you I am ashamed to be British, to my core. A referendum took place in which one side has labelled itself the worthy elite and in turn has labelled the other side ignorant racists. It is said both side have told lies during the campaign but lets not forget both voting camps followed their own instincts.
According to arrogant brain dead Remainers, their supporters are morally right and were not swayed by the perpetual myths put forward by the REMAIN campaign yet insist the 'intellectually corrupt' BREXIT voters were indeed swayed by lies and untruths.
Now this elite group use social media, the press and any other means to simply refuse to accept a democratic decision because they believe that it was made by people less educated than themselves, and conveniently label them all racist.
They are trying to usurp democracy, it's simple, and it's actually bordering on treason. I love this country, unlike the Corbyns, Tessa Jowells', the Owen Jones' and the whinging cosmopolitan elite. I believed I voted for democracy but it seems I was voting for people living in urban utopia to enjoy their comfortable place in life. To enjoy what is clearly an understanding that they know best, live better and want 'what is best for us all'. It sickens me that any and every half truth ( the latest preposterous claim being that Olympic Golds will suffer under BREXIT).
What world
do these people live in? Do they think that elite sport, gold medals and
nationalistic tub-thumping is more important than affecting poverty or
rebuilding an economy?
Millions of pounds spent to get the
incredible gold medal haul for an all too short opportunity to shout
'Rule Brittania'. Democracy was served, a decision was made. If the
elite in London overturn this decision this country is truly finished.
Most People here knows London is the hub of the financial and service centre of England and the institution of the EU is nothing more than a front for a banking-corporate-political elite running from Washington, through to London and on into Brussels.
Why do you think even Obama was flown into the UK, by request of Cameron and the remain side, to try and scare us out of leaving the EU?
Why do you think two of the most corrupt USA banks, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, funded Cameron and Osborne's pro EU campaign? Do you seriously think that big banking sees the EU as you obviously do, some kind of socialist Utopia because of its open borders policy?
It is proven out by the state of EU banks and youth unemployment in Spain, Greece, Portugal and Italy.
The real traitors of Europe are the likes of Juncker, an unelected, unaccountable little numpty who struts around dictating to entire EU nations. This old drunk who was a lousy President of tiny Luxembourg and very quickly shot into high power in the EU because of the juicy tax breaks he gave to multi nationals.
If they have done any real research whilst sunning it in their hideaway holidays they would realise that the EU is turning into a dictatorship. If they valued democracy as they should being UK citizens, then they could not support this corrupt institution. God knows we have enough on our plates with the endless fools, cheats and charlatans in our own parliament without having to cope with even more of them in Brussels...
Lord Sainsbury paid £8MILLION to help fund campaign to stop Brexit
Friday, 26 August 2016
Sunday, 21 August 2016
Wednesday, 17 August 2016
Well Ms May, you are wrong by saying nothing other than
By
Christopher Michael Baksa
Well Ms May, you are wrong by saying nothing other than "we will do everything we can to keep paying in, abide by the rules and exit in a way that helps Europe". I suggest you get your house in order and instill article 50 as soon as possible. Like Now.!!!!!
What about helping the UK you numpty. Do you not understand Europe helps itself. Germany, like America, like all the other countries bullying and threatening us to stay in the EU are only interested in what they can get out of us.
How many countries worldwide enjoy doing business directly with the EU without first coming through us or having us at the negotiating table? Come on world, how many of you, especially South Africa, China, India and the many more actually find the EU a simple, timely, easy straightforward, non-interfering and trustworthy bloc to negotiate with?
How many of us really believe all 28 countries make the decisions and it's a myth that it's a German dominated Franco-Bavarian Empire in the mould of old Ludwig?
All these countries struggling unable to do anything because of EU rules and the Euro. Have you not heard of all the deals that are on the table that wouldn't be if we hadn't voted out, as the EU would want there share. What part of unelected, unaccountable, and undemocratic do you not understand. When Merkel said come one come all did she ask all the other nations that are now being so adversely affected for there views well no she didn't.
Here in lies the problem with the EU you can't get rid of these idiots. One of the reasons we are uncompetitive in the markets well its the EU and there regulations. How long has this crisis of immigration been going on now? Have the EU come up with any plans to tackle this crisis well no, how unusual. When was the last time they did anything right? All the remoaners are lost in their little bubble, the Dutch had a referendum about Ukraine joining the EU. The Dutch voted against remember only one country needed to vote against to stop it. Go on the Mrs May remind us again what happened, the government were informed by the EU not to listen to its people and went ahead anyway. Is that the form of democracy we need or want in this country?
The EU hasn't filed accounts for 20 years, and there's only one reason why. Their simply hiding how they distribute funds, and hiding the wider agenda of Federal Europe,and their desire to control every aspect of our lives.. The Euro was implemented to delete the Franc, The Lira, The Escudo, The Marc, The paseto, and countless other sovereign currency's ultimately it's been introduced to make way for a single world currency, the Euro was never meant to survive.. Britain didn't vote for a deal with Germany, or Europe, and we do not need access to it's single market. Merkel's desperation to do a deal with Britain reflects the truth regarding Germany's 3rd attempt at dominating Europe,and in creating a Federal super-state.
Let's all consider that tariffs are a protectionist measure and the EU for instance puts a 10% tariff on Nissan and Toyota cars manufactured here in Britain. This is done to try and make them uncompetitive with the likes of VWs and BMWs.
What it basically means is that it is not free trade and the cars cost us 10% more to buy than they should. The fact is they cant stop us trading in Europe, but if we traded there and we were not members of the single market we would only have to pay tariffs on everything but the size of these tariffs would be decided by the World Trade Organisation.
In turn the EU would also have to pay these tariffs for everything they sell to us. So as they sell us £60 billion more than we sell them it would cost them more. This is why we should absolutely not accept free movement which many have said costs us a fortune to subsidise the wages of low skilled immigrants and not our own desperate forgotten people..
THE REALITY OF 'LAWS' AGAINST 'HATE PREACHERS'?
There is talk about cracking down on 'hate preachers'. What are these 'hate preachers' and what exactly is going on?
Also, a quick look at sustainability and more...
My websites:
http://davidcammegh.com/
http://www.endagenda21.com/
Friday, 12 August 2016
Tuesday, 9 August 2016
Adam Wallace: The Furious Young Men - I am not an angry young man - I'...
Published Aug 2016
Some
of the best ever things ever conceived in the mind of man began in the
meeting rooms of pubs & bars, and The Furious Young Men may well be
one such thing. (Grateful thanks to The Extremists Club for the kind
permission to upload this video.) The angry young men were a collection
of poets, novelists and playwrights who stormed the cultural scene in
1950’s Britain paving the way for the swinging 60’s with Soho, London as
the centre of it all. The 1960’s turned out to be little more than a
cultural desert whose dull monotony was alleviated by the use of mind
destroying drugs. Our civilization has been declining ever since. Now a
new generation of angry young men has arose, a generation that is not
just angry, but furious – furious with the lazy older generations who
were fooled by the promise of free love – which led to the destruction
of the family and society; fooled by the illusion of world peace -
which led to endless wars to make the world safe for Israel and a world
ruled by shadowy bankers; and fooled by the supposed nirvana of
individualism – which led to no one willing to take responsibility,
pathological selfishness, short-term shallow thinking and the
destruction of all organic identities.
The angry young men of today
like Bill Hopkins, Colin Wilson and John Braine of a previous
generation, have turned their backs resolutely on Marxism, Capitalism
and Liberalism and are instead looking towards Traditionalism as the way
to sort out the muddled mess in which we find ourselves. Adam Wallace,
broadcaster, blogger and ‘real reactionary’ is such a man and part of
a group of young men, others include The Mighty Subal, Millennial Woes
and Morgoth of Morgoth's Review, who are driving the
Identitarian/Nationalist/Traditionalist/Alt-Right movement into 'The
Happening' movement of the 21st Century. I give you ‘The Furious Young
Men’.
Adam Wallace's youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ1k...
of the best ever things ever conceived in the mind of man began in the
meeting rooms of pubs & bars, and The Furious Young Men may well be
one such thing. (Grateful thanks to The Extremists Club for the kind
permission to upload this video.) The angry young men were a collection
of poets, novelists and playwrights who stormed the cultural scene in
1950’s Britain paving the way for the swinging 60’s with Soho, London as
the centre of it all. The 1960’s turned out to be little more than a
cultural desert whose dull monotony was alleviated by the use of mind
destroying drugs. Our civilization has been declining ever since. Now a
new generation of angry young men has arose, a generation that is not
just angry, but furious – furious with the lazy older generations who
were fooled by the promise of free love – which led to the destruction
of the family and society; fooled by the illusion of world peace -
which led to endless wars to make the world safe for Israel and a world
ruled by shadowy bankers; and fooled by the supposed nirvana of
individualism – which led to no one willing to take responsibility,
pathological selfishness, short-term shallow thinking and the
destruction of all organic identities.
The angry young men of today
like Bill Hopkins, Colin Wilson and John Braine of a previous
generation, have turned their backs resolutely on Marxism, Capitalism
and Liberalism and are instead looking towards Traditionalism as the way
to sort out the muddled mess in which we find ourselves. Adam Wallace,
broadcaster, blogger and ‘real reactionary’ is such a man and part of
a group of young men, others include The Mighty Subal, Millennial Woes
and Morgoth of Morgoth's Review, who are driving the
Identitarian/Nationalist/Traditionalist/Alt-Right movement into 'The
Happening' movement of the 21st Century. I give you ‘The Furious Young
Men’.
Adam Wallace's youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ1k...
Friday, 5 August 2016
THERE'S SO MUCH EVIDENCE WE CAN NOW ALMOST GO BEYOND FAITH
Published on 5 Aug 2016
There
has been a big attack against God, mankind and Christ, so much so that
many people need more than just the Bible to discuss God.
Let have a look at the evidence - there's plnty of it.
For your free e-book of my book God Makes His Move - http://davidcammegh.com/god-makes-his...
My websites -
http://davidcammegh.com/
http://www.endagenda21.com/
Let have a look at the evidence - there's plnty of it.
For your free e-book of my book God Makes His Move - http://davidcammegh.com/god-makes-his...
My websites -
http://davidcammegh.com/
http://www.endagenda21.com/
Thursday, 4 August 2016
Black TV Show Host Intervies Dr David Duke Amazing interview
Black Talk show Host interviews David Duke. "Thomas Sotomayor Interviews
Dr. David Duke on his race for the U.S. Senate in Louisiana. An Amazing
powerful interview of a real dialogue between the African American
community and a man considered a spokesman for millions White
Americans." Uploaded with permission from Thomas Sotomayor.
Wednesday, 3 August 2016
THE POPE WANTS YOU TO BE WEAK
Published on 3 Aug 2016
In Pope Francis's recent visit to Poland he told an audience of youth that God prefers them to be weak - http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new...
This
is not surprising when we consider where Pope Francis, and much of the
higher echelons of the Catholic Church, and indeed all big churches, is
coming from.
Download my free e-book - http://davidcammegh.com/god-makes-his...
My websites -
http://davidcammegh.com/
http://www.endagenda21.com/
This
is not surprising when we consider where Pope Francis, and much of the
higher echelons of the Catholic Church, and indeed all big churches, is
coming from.
Download my free e-book - http://davidcammegh.com/god-makes-his...
My websites -
http://davidcammegh.com/
http://www.endagenda21.com/
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
10000 times stronger killer of CANCER than Chemo".
"SHARE THIS INFORMATION FIRST AND READ AFTERWARDS.....SAVE LIFE Share this as much as you can.
"10000 times stronger killer of CANCER than Chemo".. do share it.. can save many lives, fill up hopes and build confidence in the patients...
"10000 times stronger killer of CANCER than Chemo".. do share it.. can save many lives, fill up hopes and build confidence in the patients...
The Sour Sop or the fruit from the graviola tree is a miraculous natural cancer cell killer 10,000 times stronger than Chemo.
...
Why are we not aware of this? Its because some big corporation want to make back their money spent on years of research by trying to make a synthetic version of it for sale.
So, since you know it now you can help a friend in need by letting him know or just drink some sour sop juice yourself as prevention from time to time. The taste is not bad after all. It’s completely natural and definitely has no side effects. If you have the space, plant one in your garden.
The other parts of the tree are also useful.
The next time you have a fruit juice, ask for a sour sop.
How many people died in vain while this billion-dollar drug maker concealed the secret of the miraculous Graviola tree?
This tree is low and is called graviola ! in Brazi l, guanabana in Spanish and has the uninspiring name “soursop” in English. The fruit is very large and the subacid sweet white pulp is eaten out of hand or, more commonly, used to make fruit drinks, sherbets and such.
The principal interest in this plant is because of its strong anti-cancer effects. Although it is effective for a number of medical conditions, it is its anti tumor effect that is of most interest. This plant is a proven cancer remedy for cancers of all types.
Besides being a cancer remedy, graviola is a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent for both bacterial and fungal infections, is effective against internal parasites and worms, lowers high blood pressure and is used for depression, stress and nervous disorders.
If there ever was a single example that makes it dramatically clear why the existence of Health Sciences Institute is so vital to Americans like you, it’s the incredible story behind the Graviola tree..
The truth is stunningly simple: Deep within the Amazon Rainforest grows a tree that could literally revolutionize what you, your doctor, and the rest of the world thinks about cancer treatment and chances of survival. The future has never looked more promising.
Research shows that with extracts from this miraculous tree it now may be possible to:
* Attack cancer safely and effectively with an all-natural therapy that does not cause extreme nausea, weight loss and hair loss
* Protect your immune system and avoid deadly infections
* Feel stronger and healthier throughout the course of the treatment
* Boost your energy and improve your outlook on life
The source of this information is just as stunning: It comes from one of America ‘s largest drug manufacturers, th! e fruit of over 20 laboratory tests conducted since the 1970's! What those tests revealed was nothing short of mind numbing… Extracts from the tree were shown to:
* Effectively target and kill malignant cells in 12 types of cancer, including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreatic cancer..
* The tree compounds proved to be up to 10,000 times stronger in slowing the growth of cancer cells than Adriamycin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug!
* What’s more, unlike chemotherapy, the compound extracted from the Graviola tree selectivelyhunts
down and kills only cancer cells.. It does not harm healthy cells!
The amazing anti-cancer properties of the Graviola tree have been extensively researched–so why haven’t you heard anything about it? If Graviola extract is
One of America ‘s biggest billion-dollar drug makers began a search for a cancer cure and their research centered on Graviola, a legendary healing tree from the Amazon Rainforest.
Various parts of the Graviola tree–including the bark, leaves, roots, fruit and fruit-seeds–have been used for centuries by medicine men and native Indi! ans in S outh America to treat heart disease, asthma, liver problems and arthritis. Going on very little documented scientific evidence, the company poured money and resources into testing the tree’s anti-cancerous properties–and were shocked by the results. Graviola proved itself to be a cancer-killing dynamo.
But that’s where the Graviola story nearly ended.
The company had one huge problem with the Graviola tree–it’s completely natural, and so, under federal law, not patentable. There’s no way to make serious profits from it.
It turns out the drug company invested nearly seven years trying to synthesize two of the Graviola tree’s most powerful anti-cancer ingredients. If they could isolate and produce man-made clones of what makes the Graviola so potent, they’d be able to patent it and make their money back. Alas, they hit a brick wall. The original simply could not be replicated. There was no way the company could protect its profits–or even make back the millions it poured into research.
As the dream of huge profits evaporated, their testing on Graviola came to a screeching halt. Even worse, the company shelved the entire project and chose not to publish the findings of its research!
Luckily, however, there was one scientist from the Graviola research team whose conscience wouldn’t let him see such atrocity committed. Risking his career, he contacted a company that’s dedicated to harvesting medical plants from the Amazon Rainforest and blew the whistle.
Miracle unleashed
When researchers at the Health Sciences Institute were alerted to the news of Graviola,! they be gan tracking the research done on the cancer-killing tree. Evidence of the astounding effectiveness of Graviola–and its shocking cover-up–came in fast and furious….
….The National Cancer Institute performed the first scientific research in 1976. The results showed that Graviola’s “leaves and stems were found effective in attacking and destroying malignant cells.” Inexplicably, the results were published in an internal report and never released to the public…
….Since 1976, Graviola has proven to be an immensely potent cancer killer in 20 independent laboratory tests, yet no double-blind clinical trials–the typical benchmark mainstream doctors and journals use to judge a treatment’s value–were ever initiated….
….A study published in the Journal of Natural Products, following a recent study conducted at Catholic University of South Korea stated that one chemical in Graviola was found to selectively kill colon cancer cells at “10,000 times the potency of (the commonly used chemotherapy drug) Adriamycin…”
….The most significant part of the Catholic University of South Korea report is that Graviola was shown to selectively target the cancer cells, leaving healthy cells untouched. Unlike chemotherapy, which indiscriminately targets all actively reproducing cells (such as stomach and hair cells), causing the often devastating side effects of nausea and hair loss in cancer patients.
…A study at Purdue University recently found that leaves from the Graviola tree killed cancer cells among six human cell lines and were especially effective against prostate, pancreatic and lung cancers Seven years of silence broken–it’s finally here!!!
...
Why are we not aware of this? Its because some big corporation want to make back their money spent on years of research by trying to make a synthetic version of it for sale.
So, since you know it now you can help a friend in need by letting him know or just drink some sour sop juice yourself as prevention from time to time. The taste is not bad after all. It’s completely natural and definitely has no side effects. If you have the space, plant one in your garden.
The other parts of the tree are also useful.
The next time you have a fruit juice, ask for a sour sop.
How many people died in vain while this billion-dollar drug maker concealed the secret of the miraculous Graviola tree?
This tree is low and is called graviola ! in Brazi l, guanabana in Spanish and has the uninspiring name “soursop” in English. The fruit is very large and the subacid sweet white pulp is eaten out of hand or, more commonly, used to make fruit drinks, sherbets and such.
The principal interest in this plant is because of its strong anti-cancer effects. Although it is effective for a number of medical conditions, it is its anti tumor effect that is of most interest. This plant is a proven cancer remedy for cancers of all types.
Besides being a cancer remedy, graviola is a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent for both bacterial and fungal infections, is effective against internal parasites and worms, lowers high blood pressure and is used for depression, stress and nervous disorders.
If there ever was a single example that makes it dramatically clear why the existence of Health Sciences Institute is so vital to Americans like you, it’s the incredible story behind the Graviola tree..
The truth is stunningly simple: Deep within the Amazon Rainforest grows a tree that could literally revolutionize what you, your doctor, and the rest of the world thinks about cancer treatment and chances of survival. The future has never looked more promising.
Research shows that with extracts from this miraculous tree it now may be possible to:
* Attack cancer safely and effectively with an all-natural therapy that does not cause extreme nausea, weight loss and hair loss
* Protect your immune system and avoid deadly infections
* Feel stronger and healthier throughout the course of the treatment
* Boost your energy and improve your outlook on life
The source of this information is just as stunning: It comes from one of America ‘s largest drug manufacturers, th! e fruit of over 20 laboratory tests conducted since the 1970's! What those tests revealed was nothing short of mind numbing… Extracts from the tree were shown to:
* Effectively target and kill malignant cells in 12 types of cancer, including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreatic cancer..
* The tree compounds proved to be up to 10,000 times stronger in slowing the growth of cancer cells than Adriamycin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug!
* What’s more, unlike chemotherapy, the compound extracted from the Graviola tree selectivelyhunts
down and kills only cancer cells.. It does not harm healthy cells!
The amazing anti-cancer properties of the Graviola tree have been extensively researched–so why haven’t you heard anything about it? If Graviola extract is
One of America ‘s biggest billion-dollar drug makers began a search for a cancer cure and their research centered on Graviola, a legendary healing tree from the Amazon Rainforest.
Various parts of the Graviola tree–including the bark, leaves, roots, fruit and fruit-seeds–have been used for centuries by medicine men and native Indi! ans in S outh America to treat heart disease, asthma, liver problems and arthritis. Going on very little documented scientific evidence, the company poured money and resources into testing the tree’s anti-cancerous properties–and were shocked by the results. Graviola proved itself to be a cancer-killing dynamo.
But that’s where the Graviola story nearly ended.
The company had one huge problem with the Graviola tree–it’s completely natural, and so, under federal law, not patentable. There’s no way to make serious profits from it.
It turns out the drug company invested nearly seven years trying to synthesize two of the Graviola tree’s most powerful anti-cancer ingredients. If they could isolate and produce man-made clones of what makes the Graviola so potent, they’d be able to patent it and make their money back. Alas, they hit a brick wall. The original simply could not be replicated. There was no way the company could protect its profits–or even make back the millions it poured into research.
As the dream of huge profits evaporated, their testing on Graviola came to a screeching halt. Even worse, the company shelved the entire project and chose not to publish the findings of its research!
Luckily, however, there was one scientist from the Graviola research team whose conscience wouldn’t let him see such atrocity committed. Risking his career, he contacted a company that’s dedicated to harvesting medical plants from the Amazon Rainforest and blew the whistle.
Miracle unleashed
When researchers at the Health Sciences Institute were alerted to the news of Graviola,! they be gan tracking the research done on the cancer-killing tree. Evidence of the astounding effectiveness of Graviola–and its shocking cover-up–came in fast and furious….
….The National Cancer Institute performed the first scientific research in 1976. The results showed that Graviola’s “leaves and stems were found effective in attacking and destroying malignant cells.” Inexplicably, the results were published in an internal report and never released to the public…
….Since 1976, Graviola has proven to be an immensely potent cancer killer in 20 independent laboratory tests, yet no double-blind clinical trials–the typical benchmark mainstream doctors and journals use to judge a treatment’s value–were ever initiated….
….A study published in the Journal of Natural Products, following a recent study conducted at Catholic University of South Korea stated that one chemical in Graviola was found to selectively kill colon cancer cells at “10,000 times the potency of (the commonly used chemotherapy drug) Adriamycin…”
….The most significant part of the Catholic University of South Korea report is that Graviola was shown to selectively target the cancer cells, leaving healthy cells untouched. Unlike chemotherapy, which indiscriminately targets all actively reproducing cells (such as stomach and hair cells), causing the often devastating side effects of nausea and hair loss in cancer patients.
…A study at Purdue University recently found that leaves from the Graviola tree killed cancer cells among six human cell lines and were especially effective against prostate, pancreatic and lung cancers Seven years of silence broken–it’s finally here!!!
Friday, 22 July 2016
Today's newsletter from UKIP:
Today's newsletter from UKIP:
Dear Sir,Daily you fill your letters pages with calls for the referendum to be re-run because a minority did not like the result; the mere fact that well over a million more voted to leave the EU than remain apparently means nothing to them.
The fact
that the referendum was not a minor matter or glorified opinion poll but
an Act of Parliament backed by a 6 to 1 majority of MPs seems not to
have registered with the 'Remainers'.
The fact that the Conservative manifesto makes clear that it is a 'one time only deal' and "we will honour the result" seems to mean nothing either to those who rebel against democracy both in, and out, of the Houses of Commons and Lords.
The fact that, whatever happens over the referendum, there will be a general election in 2020 at the latest and woe betide the MP, and indeed party, who decides to ignore the 17 million plus voters who want to leave the EU by voting to overturn the result. UKIP, the one party which will get us out of the EU, is ready to hoover up those votes, five million more than voted Tory in 2015.
The whole thing boils down to one simple question: is the UK a democracy run by the people (as UKIP believe) or a parliamentary dictatorship which ignores the will and opinions of the majority for their own selfish ends, as many MPs seem to think? In other words, have the Houses of Parliament become so tainted by the way Brussels does business that they no longer recall how it is done in the UK, via a simple majority rule verdict?
The referendum question, which I'm sure 17 million of us thought was resolved on June 23rd, will be an interesting test case but MPs must understand that the people are in no mood to be ignored over Brexit, especially as the country is already beginning on the road to recovery away from the EU and we don't want to see that progress overturned for no good reason.
I would respectfully suggest to Mrs May that she stop procrastinating over Article 50 and trigger it this year. What is she waiting for given that she has a legal mandate over the EU, arguably the first any European Union leader, certainly in the UK, has ever been given by their electorate.
Yours faithfully, (signed; Steve Crowther.)
The fact that the Conservative manifesto makes clear that it is a 'one time only deal' and "we will honour the result" seems to mean nothing either to those who rebel against democracy both in, and out, of the Houses of Commons and Lords.
The fact that, whatever happens over the referendum, there will be a general election in 2020 at the latest and woe betide the MP, and indeed party, who decides to ignore the 17 million plus voters who want to leave the EU by voting to overturn the result. UKIP, the one party which will get us out of the EU, is ready to hoover up those votes, five million more than voted Tory in 2015.
The whole thing boils down to one simple question: is the UK a democracy run by the people (as UKIP believe) or a parliamentary dictatorship which ignores the will and opinions of the majority for their own selfish ends, as many MPs seem to think? In other words, have the Houses of Parliament become so tainted by the way Brussels does business that they no longer recall how it is done in the UK, via a simple majority rule verdict?
The referendum question, which I'm sure 17 million of us thought was resolved on June 23rd, will be an interesting test case but MPs must understand that the people are in no mood to be ignored over Brexit, especially as the country is already beginning on the road to recovery away from the EU and we don't want to see that progress overturned for no good reason.
I would respectfully suggest to Mrs May that she stop procrastinating over Article 50 and trigger it this year. What is she waiting for given that she has a legal mandate over the EU, arguably the first any European Union leader, certainly in the UK, has ever been given by their electorate.
Yours faithfully, (signed; Steve Crowther.)
Tuesday, 19 July 2016
Thursday, 14 July 2016
The War Criminal Winston Churchill
This article was found on the Calvin College website, they are a
Christian academic community dedicated to rigorous intellectual inquiry.
Calvin College was founded in 1876 by the Christian Reformed Church in
North America and named for 16th-century reformer John Calvin.
Background: This 1944 essay by Alfred Rosenberg analyzes a collection of Churchill’s pre-war essays. Rosenberg concludes that Churchill was long plotting war against Germany, supported from behind the scenes by the Jews. I am using Churchill’s original words from Step by Step: 1936-1939 (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939). With an occasional exception, the German translation is accurate, though the passages are, as one might expect, chosen selectively.
The source: Alfred Rosenberg, “Der Kriegsverbrecher Churchill,” Der Schulungsbrief, (March/April 1944), p. 20-22, 28.
Even before he became prime minister, Churchill consistently agitated against Germany in his articles, angrily attacking above all anyone in England who strove for an understanding with Germany. Later, Churchill affirmed this journalistic agitation when he published his essays, only lightly retouched he said, in a book. He titled it Step by Step. It contained his essays written between 1936 and 1939. Step by Step was intended to suggest that the German Reich had intentionally caused the new world war, and that it was really Churchill who warned the so-called civilized nations about it. In fact, Churchill’s hatred of Europe’s Renaissance, and its peaceful order, flows from every line. Let me examine several unintentional admissions more carefully.
One of the central points of Churchill’s thinking has to do with England’s billions of investments in the Far East. Everything centers around the opium trade and similar profitable businesses. Churchill clearly had interested big money in his closest circle, with whose favor and help he wanted to become prime minister of the kingdom of Great Britain. On 3 September 1937, he published an article titled “The Wounded Dragon,” by which he meant China. He wrote:
No single power, except after long preparation, could impose its will upon Japan in the Yellow Sea. If the United States and Great Britain acted together jointly for several years, and if they were supported by Soviet Russia, representations could no doubt be made to which Japan would have to defer. [Rosenberg cuts an intervening section without noting it.]
We have created great establishments and businesses in China which have done nothing but good [Rosenberg inserts a “?” here] to the Chinese….. European and American missionaries have carried their message fearlessly into the recesses of China.
These words clearly show Churchill’s longing for a grand alliance between England, the USA, and the Soviet Union two years before the war broke out. The Chinese, ruined by England, are mocked when he says that the English provision of opium and missionaries had brought “only good.” Everyone knew that China was the target of Jewish and other high finance, and Churchill’s sanctimonious tone hardly concealed the true reasons for his policies in the Far East. Churchill clearly directed his attentions in 1937 to protecting big business in China, adding in the same sentence: “If Europe wishes to talk to the East, she will have to clean up her home lines first.”
This single sentence reveals Mr. Churchill’s entire war policy. He wants to “clean up” Europe, which means making any kind of common effort impossible that would benefit the entire continent and bring about a new order. He wants to perpetuate the impotence and fragmentation of the civilized European states. After Europe has been “cleaned up,” and after India and the Middle East have been exploited, he wants to bring all of the Far East under the thieving capitalism of the City and Wall Street, as well as subjecting it to the Bolshevist threat.
After this beginning, Churchill reveals how he wants to prepare for the “cleaning up.” It involves the isolation and defeat of the German Reich. When the Führer and the Duce met in fall 1937, Churchill wrote the following on 1 October 1937:
The Western democracies, now armed and arming heavily, have much to give these harassed dictators, if they would only prove that they mean to be the friends and not the bane of our common humanity. If the true concert of Europe were re-established, our collective remonstrances would not go unheeded in the Far East.
Churchill thinks only of re-establishing the European concert, which means a situation in which England is the outside choir master. His comment that the Western democracies are armed, and arming heavily, shows that all the latter chatter about being “unprepared” was simply a lie. When Italy, under Mussolini, later took successful steps to secure Africa, Churchill angrily wrote on 4 March 1939:
But this is not the end. The underlying realities and verities of Europe will increasingly assert themselves. In a short time we shall know whether Mr. Chamberlain’s hope of detaching Mussolini from Hitler will be realized. If it is not realized, nothing else that Mussolini could give us is of the slightest value. [Rosenberg omits a section here without noting it.] If Mussolini is willing to separate from Hitler, to take his stand with France and Britain, and help sustain the independence of Austria, there will be an undoubted gain.
These words reveal not only Churchill’s policies, but also those of that fine man Prime Minister Chamberlain. We learn from Churchill’s own mouth that the good Mr. Chamberlain used all his strength to separate Mussolini from Adolf Hitler, which leads to the necessary conclusion that the goal was to encircle both of them, “cleaning up” one after the other.
The reference to Austria as the hoped-for launching pad next to Czechoslovakia is more than clear. That is why Churchill fell into such a rage as Ostmark German-Austria jubilantly joined the German Reich. In an article titled “The Austrian Catastrophe” [the actual title was “The Austrian Eye-Opener”] dated 18 March 1938, Churchill wrote of the “seizure and subjugation of Austria,” although this man naturally knew very well that only a small clique of Jews and reactionaries were listening to England and the Jews, whereas the whole decent population of Ostmark [Austria] could hardly contain its joy as the dream of the union of all Germans was fulfilled — as indeed was consistent with the right of self-determination that even the Entente had once proclaimed.
In the same article, he began provocative warmongering to bring about a war coalition against Germany.
The first step is to find out which of the Powers of the second rank in Europe would be willing to join with Great Britain and France for special action, not excluding armed resistance, under the Covenant of the League.
It is not without its attractions to establish that world power England immediately tried to discover which of the “smaller” European powers were ready to serve as canon fodder against the German Reich. The remark become even more interesting when he further says: “It must also be made clear that there is no desire to encircle Germany, but only to encircle an aggressor.”
Encirclement! It is well known that British policy always claimed to have no intention of encircling Germany. But now Winston Churchill himself has used the word “encirclement,” and that cannot be erased from the world. He himself affirmed with this word a plan to encircle Germany, which he insolently terms an aggressor. No subsequent attempts at concealment can rescue Churchill the warmonger, who has revealed himself.
Throughout the period, Churchill relied on France as a junior partner, and naturally feared that its various party groups could cause a weakening of its military power. In 1938 he wrote on the newly-formed Daladier government:
If France broke, everything would break, and the Nazi domination of Europe, and potentially of a large part of the world, would seem to be inevitable.
This is another bald-faced lie, suggesting that Germany wanted not only to unite all Germans, but bring the whole world under its “tyranny.” He turns next to nasty agitation against all those decent Englishmen who really want peace. Churchill writes:
I wonder whether the French people realize how bitter and persistent is the pro-German propaganda in this island? The strongest point, repeatedly made, is that France is on the verge of collapse. She is portrayed as about to go down the same bloody sewer as Spain has done. All the “Heil Hitler” brigade in London society exploit and gloat over what they are pleased to call “the Parliamentary impotence of the French democracy.”
Churchill’s Jewish brigade guided his attempt to make the so-called “Heil Hitler brigade” in London look ludicrous, even though it consisted of far-sighted Englishmen. They financed him, and were also the main agitators behind Roosevelt in the United States. The US-American ambassadors in France and Poland continually and intentionally fanned the world conflagration. After wishing Daladier “all the best,” Churchill mentions Jewish forces in France, writing:
But he has one important political force in reserve. M. Blum will not fail the cause of European freedom. His influence with the Socialist party is commanding. He will certainly give loyal aid.
The Jew Blum, of course, was the hope of all Jewish lackeys, and one of the main agitators against an understanding between the German Reich and the French Republic.
Following the essays in chronological order, I come to May 1938. Churchill returns to the presumed difficulties of the Japanese in China, noting in his article of 26 May 1938 that these difficulties are primarily the result of Russian threats:
Here we must recognize the services which Soviet Russia is rendering in the Far East to civilization and also to British and United States interests.
On 6 July 1938, Churchill moans once more about the so-called rape of Austria, but he is worried most about the Jews. He complains about the incarceration of the representative of Jewish high finance, Rothschild, about the terrible fact that “Jewish ladies” are forced to clean the streets, then continues:
But 300,000 Jews in Vienna present a problem of large dimensions and intractable quality to a policy of extirpation.”
After Churchill has lamented the presumed terrible economic situation of the Jews, he turns, as always, to making threats:
The tale of their tribulation spreads widely through the world, and it is astonishing that the German rulers are not more concerned at the tides of abhorrence and anger which are rising ceaselessly against them through the heavily-arming United States.
Churchill sees Jewish rage over the fact that it is not possible to bleed the German Reich dry, since Germany has freed its lands from parasites, as a decisive factor in politics, and therefore unintentionally reveals the extent to which Englanders and Americans have become unable to govern their nations themselves, making their fate and their activities — the “heavily-arming United States” — dependent on the rage and opinions of big Jewish financial parasites and Bolshevist agitators.
This careless statement by Mr. Churchill shows in which direction, and on whose orders, Great Britain’s current prime minister is directing his policies. It is occasionally healthy and good to look at what a war criminal once wrote, and later gathered together in a book. They reveal that his war crimes were systematically planned.
This places all those lying communiqués from whatever world conference he and his buddies have gathered at in their proper light. They show how Churchill strove “step by step” for power, motivated by hatred and pride, supported by Jewish agitation. The plainly stated goal was to turn the Far East into an enormous object of exploitation for the whole of Jewish world plutocracy, “cleaning up” Europe in the process so as to render it powerless, to atomize it into its various parts, splitting it into battling states so that it would keep from involvement in world politics, and ultimately impoverish itself. To this end, he worked together with Mr. Chamberlain to isolate Fascist Italy from Germany, to arrange an alliance of the smaller peoples against the German Reich (meaning, probably Czechoslovakia and Poland, later Belgium and Holland), and to use the “independence” of Austria as a launching pad for an attack of the entire anti-European world conspiracy to subject the German people to Jewish exploitive policies.
Mr. Churchill stands before us today as a war criminal, as a world-class criminal, revealed through his own words. It would be good for so-called neutrals to pay serious attention to his words, and to know the situation in which the German Reich found itself. Then they will understand that this German Reich today is the only force battling the conspiracy of Pan-Jewish Anglo-American biological plans for destruction, and is using its full strength to defend and protect the old Europe, even the lives of those who do not believe that they have to take the war seriously, since they still live in a safe place.
Source: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/schul05.htm
Background: This 1944 essay by Alfred Rosenberg analyzes a collection of Churchill’s pre-war essays. Rosenberg concludes that Churchill was long plotting war against Germany, supported from behind the scenes by the Jews. I am using Churchill’s original words from Step by Step: 1936-1939 (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939). With an occasional exception, the German translation is accurate, though the passages are, as one might expect, chosen selectively.
The source: Alfred Rosenberg, “Der Kriegsverbrecher Churchill,” Der Schulungsbrief, (March/April 1944), p. 20-22, 28.
The War Criminal Churchill
by Alfred Rosenberg
For many years, the main propagandist against the German people has
been Winston Churchill, driven on by influential money from American and
Jewish sources. It is therefore instructive to examine the career of
this war criminal, using his own words.Even before he became prime minister, Churchill consistently agitated against Germany in his articles, angrily attacking above all anyone in England who strove for an understanding with Germany. Later, Churchill affirmed this journalistic agitation when he published his essays, only lightly retouched he said, in a book. He titled it Step by Step. It contained his essays written between 1936 and 1939. Step by Step was intended to suggest that the German Reich had intentionally caused the new world war, and that it was really Churchill who warned the so-called civilized nations about it. In fact, Churchill’s hatred of Europe’s Renaissance, and its peaceful order, flows from every line. Let me examine several unintentional admissions more carefully.
One of the central points of Churchill’s thinking has to do with England’s billions of investments in the Far East. Everything centers around the opium trade and similar profitable businesses. Churchill clearly had interested big money in his closest circle, with whose favor and help he wanted to become prime minister of the kingdom of Great Britain. On 3 September 1937, he published an article titled “The Wounded Dragon,” by which he meant China. He wrote:
No single power, except after long preparation, could impose its will upon Japan in the Yellow Sea. If the United States and Great Britain acted together jointly for several years, and if they were supported by Soviet Russia, representations could no doubt be made to which Japan would have to defer. [Rosenberg cuts an intervening section without noting it.]
We have created great establishments and businesses in China which have done nothing but good [Rosenberg inserts a “?” here] to the Chinese….. European and American missionaries have carried their message fearlessly into the recesses of China.
These words clearly show Churchill’s longing for a grand alliance between England, the USA, and the Soviet Union two years before the war broke out. The Chinese, ruined by England, are mocked when he says that the English provision of opium and missionaries had brought “only good.” Everyone knew that China was the target of Jewish and other high finance, and Churchill’s sanctimonious tone hardly concealed the true reasons for his policies in the Far East. Churchill clearly directed his attentions in 1937 to protecting big business in China, adding in the same sentence: “If Europe wishes to talk to the East, she will have to clean up her home lines first.”
This single sentence reveals Mr. Churchill’s entire war policy. He wants to “clean up” Europe, which means making any kind of common effort impossible that would benefit the entire continent and bring about a new order. He wants to perpetuate the impotence and fragmentation of the civilized European states. After Europe has been “cleaned up,” and after India and the Middle East have been exploited, he wants to bring all of the Far East under the thieving capitalism of the City and Wall Street, as well as subjecting it to the Bolshevist threat.
After this beginning, Churchill reveals how he wants to prepare for the “cleaning up.” It involves the isolation and defeat of the German Reich. When the Führer and the Duce met in fall 1937, Churchill wrote the following on 1 October 1937:
The Western democracies, now armed and arming heavily, have much to give these harassed dictators, if they would only prove that they mean to be the friends and not the bane of our common humanity. If the true concert of Europe were re-established, our collective remonstrances would not go unheeded in the Far East.
Churchill thinks only of re-establishing the European concert, which means a situation in which England is the outside choir master. His comment that the Western democracies are armed, and arming heavily, shows that all the latter chatter about being “unprepared” was simply a lie. When Italy, under Mussolini, later took successful steps to secure Africa, Churchill angrily wrote on 4 March 1939:
But this is not the end. The underlying realities and verities of Europe will increasingly assert themselves. In a short time we shall know whether Mr. Chamberlain’s hope of detaching Mussolini from Hitler will be realized. If it is not realized, nothing else that Mussolini could give us is of the slightest value. [Rosenberg omits a section here without noting it.] If Mussolini is willing to separate from Hitler, to take his stand with France and Britain, and help sustain the independence of Austria, there will be an undoubted gain.
These words reveal not only Churchill’s policies, but also those of that fine man Prime Minister Chamberlain. We learn from Churchill’s own mouth that the good Mr. Chamberlain used all his strength to separate Mussolini from Adolf Hitler, which leads to the necessary conclusion that the goal was to encircle both of them, “cleaning up” one after the other.
The reference to Austria as the hoped-for launching pad next to Czechoslovakia is more than clear. That is why Churchill fell into such a rage as Ostmark German-Austria jubilantly joined the German Reich. In an article titled “The Austrian Catastrophe” [the actual title was “The Austrian Eye-Opener”] dated 18 March 1938, Churchill wrote of the “seizure and subjugation of Austria,” although this man naturally knew very well that only a small clique of Jews and reactionaries were listening to England and the Jews, whereas the whole decent population of Ostmark [Austria] could hardly contain its joy as the dream of the union of all Germans was fulfilled — as indeed was consistent with the right of self-determination that even the Entente had once proclaimed.
In the same article, he began provocative warmongering to bring about a war coalition against Germany.
The first step is to find out which of the Powers of the second rank in Europe would be willing to join with Great Britain and France for special action, not excluding armed resistance, under the Covenant of the League.
It is not without its attractions to establish that world power England immediately tried to discover which of the “smaller” European powers were ready to serve as canon fodder against the German Reich. The remark become even more interesting when he further says: “It must also be made clear that there is no desire to encircle Germany, but only to encircle an aggressor.”
Encirclement! It is well known that British policy always claimed to have no intention of encircling Germany. But now Winston Churchill himself has used the word “encirclement,” and that cannot be erased from the world. He himself affirmed with this word a plan to encircle Germany, which he insolently terms an aggressor. No subsequent attempts at concealment can rescue Churchill the warmonger, who has revealed himself.
Throughout the period, Churchill relied on France as a junior partner, and naturally feared that its various party groups could cause a weakening of its military power. In 1938 he wrote on the newly-formed Daladier government:
If France broke, everything would break, and the Nazi domination of Europe, and potentially of a large part of the world, would seem to be inevitable.
This is another bald-faced lie, suggesting that Germany wanted not only to unite all Germans, but bring the whole world under its “tyranny.” He turns next to nasty agitation against all those decent Englishmen who really want peace. Churchill writes:
I wonder whether the French people realize how bitter and persistent is the pro-German propaganda in this island? The strongest point, repeatedly made, is that France is on the verge of collapse. She is portrayed as about to go down the same bloody sewer as Spain has done. All the “Heil Hitler” brigade in London society exploit and gloat over what they are pleased to call “the Parliamentary impotence of the French democracy.”
Churchill’s Jewish brigade guided his attempt to make the so-called “Heil Hitler brigade” in London look ludicrous, even though it consisted of far-sighted Englishmen. They financed him, and were also the main agitators behind Roosevelt in the United States. The US-American ambassadors in France and Poland continually and intentionally fanned the world conflagration. After wishing Daladier “all the best,” Churchill mentions Jewish forces in France, writing:
But he has one important political force in reserve. M. Blum will not fail the cause of European freedom. His influence with the Socialist party is commanding. He will certainly give loyal aid.
The Jew Blum, of course, was the hope of all Jewish lackeys, and one of the main agitators against an understanding between the German Reich and the French Republic.
Following the essays in chronological order, I come to May 1938. Churchill returns to the presumed difficulties of the Japanese in China, noting in his article of 26 May 1938 that these difficulties are primarily the result of Russian threats:
Here we must recognize the services which Soviet Russia is rendering in the Far East to civilization and also to British and United States interests.
On 6 July 1938, Churchill moans once more about the so-called rape of Austria, but he is worried most about the Jews. He complains about the incarceration of the representative of Jewish high finance, Rothschild, about the terrible fact that “Jewish ladies” are forced to clean the streets, then continues:
But 300,000 Jews in Vienna present a problem of large dimensions and intractable quality to a policy of extirpation.”
After Churchill has lamented the presumed terrible economic situation of the Jews, he turns, as always, to making threats:
The tale of their tribulation spreads widely through the world, and it is astonishing that the German rulers are not more concerned at the tides of abhorrence and anger which are rising ceaselessly against them through the heavily-arming United States.
Churchill sees Jewish rage over the fact that it is not possible to bleed the German Reich dry, since Germany has freed its lands from parasites, as a decisive factor in politics, and therefore unintentionally reveals the extent to which Englanders and Americans have become unable to govern their nations themselves, making their fate and their activities — the “heavily-arming United States” — dependent on the rage and opinions of big Jewish financial parasites and Bolshevist agitators.
This careless statement by Mr. Churchill shows in which direction, and on whose orders, Great Britain’s current prime minister is directing his policies. It is occasionally healthy and good to look at what a war criminal once wrote, and later gathered together in a book. They reveal that his war crimes were systematically planned.
This places all those lying communiqués from whatever world conference he and his buddies have gathered at in their proper light. They show how Churchill strove “step by step” for power, motivated by hatred and pride, supported by Jewish agitation. The plainly stated goal was to turn the Far East into an enormous object of exploitation for the whole of Jewish world plutocracy, “cleaning up” Europe in the process so as to render it powerless, to atomize it into its various parts, splitting it into battling states so that it would keep from involvement in world politics, and ultimately impoverish itself. To this end, he worked together with Mr. Chamberlain to isolate Fascist Italy from Germany, to arrange an alliance of the smaller peoples against the German Reich (meaning, probably Czechoslovakia and Poland, later Belgium and Holland), and to use the “independence” of Austria as a launching pad for an attack of the entire anti-European world conspiracy to subject the German people to Jewish exploitive policies.
Mr. Churchill stands before us today as a war criminal, as a world-class criminal, revealed through his own words. It would be good for so-called neutrals to pay serious attention to his words, and to know the situation in which the German Reich found itself. Then they will understand that this German Reich today is the only force battling the conspiracy of Pan-Jewish Anglo-American biological plans for destruction, and is using its full strength to defend and protect the old Europe, even the lives of those who do not believe that they have to take the war seriously, since they still live in a safe place.
Source: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/schul05.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)