ConDem Government Abandons Yet another Tory Election Promise

ConDem Government Abandons Yet another Tory Election Promise

The ConDem coalition government has abandoned yet another Tory election promise, this time the one which undertook to bar immigrants unless they had a command of English.

The promise was a major part of the Conservative Party’s election campaign in the completely false assumption that speaking English would turn a Congo pygmy into an Englishman.

However, even this absurd presumption has been thrown away, like almost all other Tory election promises, with the ruling by Home Secretary Theresa May that the families of asylum seekers will be exempt from the rule.

The announcement was made on the quiet in a written Commons reply last week which said: “The new language requirement will not apply to dependants of refugees and people granted humanitarian pro­tection in the UK.”

The reason for the ruling is directly attributable to Britain’s membership of the European Union.

The demand that asylum seekers speak English breaches Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives everyone “the right to a family life.”

It was to fit in with this EU rule that the previous Labour regime introduced the Human Rights Act (which the Conservatives also promised to repeal, another promise which they threw out the window).

It is therefore possible for an asylum seeker to argue that their right to a “family life” is greater than the demand that they speak English.

As such, the EU court can override any rule made by a British court.

Although the Tories will now claim that they have no choice but to accept this “exception” to their rule, the reality is that all objective observers knew all along that this was an impossible promise to fulfil.

Membership of the EU compels Britain to abide by that organisation’s rules and laws.

The Conservatives’ promises to repeal the Human Rights Act, “roll back EU power” and force immigrants to speak English are all impossible to achieve while Britain remains a member of the EU.

All of this is obvious from the briefest reading of the Lisbon Treaty, which forces observers to one of only two conclusions:

1. The Tories really did not know, and they are incompetent fools; or

2. The Tories do know what the situation is, and they deliberately lied to the public.

Either way, the verdict on the Tories is equally ghastly.

BNP Newsroom 

Who is caring for our elderly in Bolton ?

June 2010

Who is caring for our elderly?

Our town’s so called independent newspaper the Bolton News has given some attention to the story about two foreigners previously convicted of fraud who have been employed as care workers. This has been allowed to happen by means of a government funded scheme being run by Bolton Council called ‘New Chance’.



Some people have voiced concern that employing ex-criminal to care for vulnerable people is inappropriate, and that Criminal Records Bureau [CRB] checks are supposed to stop this happening. But the reality is that CRB checks can not identify the backgrounds of a great many people who are providing care for our elderly.



The reason for the huge loophole in CRB checks is down to the Home Office. When, for instance an asylum refugee wants to apply for a job in a care home it is in most cases impossible for the CRB to do a check on that individual: let’s face it if a foreigner is telling us they have been persecuted by a regime or political system how can we grant them asylum and then ask their persecutor if our new found refugee has a criminal record. In cases like this the Home Office supplies a letter, removing the requirement for CRB checks to be carried out.



As someone who has had quite a lot of first hand contact with care homes I know that there are many refugees working in these homes and for agencies. Now the question is; how can the Home Office know that these people are not ex-criminals, how can the Home Office know that these people will not harm or have not already harmed elderly people.



For some time I have been in pursuit of answers to these questions, but as so often is the case it seems someone in the Home Office and the Bolton News believes that the BNP are best ignored.



Anthony Backhouse

Political Correctness Gone Mad! It Is Now a Criminal Offence to Call Someone a “Coconut

Political Correctness Gone Mad: It Is Now a Criminal Offence to Call Someone a “Coconut”

Wed, 30/06/2010 - 08:23 |  BNP News

The unfathomable depths to which political correctness has plunged Britain has been underlined with a court ruling that it is now a criminal racial offence to call someone a “coconut” in public.

The astonishing decision was made by Bristol Magistrates' Court after a Jamaican-origin black city councillor, Shirley Brown, referred to an Asian Tory councillor as a “coconut” during a council debate in February last year.

Although Ms Brown did not specify what she meant, she said in the council chamber that her “community” would understand the meaning of calling someone a coconut.

In the black community, to call someone a coconut means that that are black or brown on the outside, but white on the inside — in other words, they are traitors to their people and side with whites.

The Indian-born Tory, Jay Jethwa, had earlier in the chamber called for the £250,000 annual grant to fund “ethnic minority groups” to be halted.

Ms Brown, a proud Liberal Democrat, was given a 12-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £620 costs after being convicted of “inciting racial hatred” against Mrs Jethwa.

District Judge Simon Cook said that he was “satisfied there was a risk to public disorder and stimulation of racial hatred” even though there was absolutely no evidence that any racial hatred had erupted or been caused as a result of the comment.

The issue here is not whether two immigrants seek to lambaste each other over whether there should be funding for a ceremony to mark the 200th anniversary of the ending of the slave trade or not.

The real issue here is that political correctness has reached such impossible levels that even a mild and humorous comment such as calling someone a coconut can now be classed as a criminal offence.

Where will it end? And what meanings will be attached to other fruit sorts in the future? Will it be illegal to call someone a banana because they get blacker with age?

This is an extremely dangerous precedent to set, and one which needs to be opposed by all sane and rational people, no matter what their political party.

It is nothing less than an attack on the very principle of freedom of speech and democracy, and one more step towards George Orwell’s predicted totalitarian state.

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect You:r Bolton Welfare

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect You: Welfare

BNP Newsroom

The domestic spending cuts — which are in marked contrast to the increased spending on foreign aid, EU membership and the war in Afghanistan — will directly reduce the quality of welfare services provided to the British people and place additional strain on the NHS.

A report in the latest issue of the British Medical Journal, authored by a combined research team under the leadership of University of Oxford lecturer Dr David Stuckler, warned that “ordinary people may be paying the ultimate price for budget cuts.”

According to their study, analysis of European data showed that a £70 reduction in welfare spending per person is associated with a 2.8 percent rise in alcohol-related deaths and 1.2 percent rise in deaths from heart disease.

The study was released in the wake of a ConDem announcement that there would be reductions in tax credits for families, housing benefit and maternity grants.

The new study looked at the effects of welfare funding on health and analysed government spending in 15 European countries, including the UK, from 1980 to 2005.

The researchers found without exception that when social spending — including support for families and the unemployed — was high, death rates fell, but when they were low, rates rose substantially.

“For every £70 drop in spending per person, there is a 1.19 percent rise in overall deaths,” the report said, adding that the biggest effect was seen in illnesses linked to social circumstances, such as heart disease.

This is specific to social welfare spending and completely independent of healthcare spending.

The analysis also showed that reducing other forms of government spending, such as on the military or prisons, had no such negative impact on the public's health.

Dr Stuckler said in the report that although governments may feel they are protecting population health by safeguarding the healthcare budgets, welfare spending may actually be more important.

He also warned that the added burden of poor health linked to welfare cuts could place more strain on the NHS.

"So far the discussions around budget cuts have largely focussed on economics,” Dr Stuckler said.

"But social circumstances are crucial to people's health and our study shows there could be quite significant harms.

"If we want to promote a sustainable recovery in Britain, we must first ensure that we have taken care of people's most basic health needs."

Once again, the British people are put last.

Contempt of Court - more like abuse of power by EHCR

Contempt of Court - more like abuse of power

Created: green Arrow and Freinds

The Guardian is salivating over the fact that Nick Griffin MEP BNP and two other BNP officials could have their assets seized which includes the BNP Chairmans MEP salary, investments, pensions and property they own for contempt of court.  The Guardian shamefully announces these dreadful and undemocratic threats in this way.

The case shows that no political party is above the law.

Indeed the law should be, that no matter how high, no person is above the law.  But the law in this case is being used to silence the voice of the British People and those that use and abuse the law to attempt to silence the British National Party will one day be brought to trial, judged and if found guilty and if there is any justice.  Hung for the rats they are.

The Guardian also seems to have a problem with people of any descent or origin only being allowed to join the BNP if they; "agrees with or supports or does not oppose or does not disagree with the principles of our party".

Now what sort of warped mind has a problem with the above?  People do tend to join a political party because they support their principles not oppose them.  By their warped logic, I should be allowed to join the Labour Party even thought I totally disagree with everything they stand for and would destroy it in an heart beat if given the chance. 

Perhaps that is what the entire membership of the BNP should do.  Join enmass the Labour Party and return it to the party it was when first created.  One that cared about British Workers instead of the self seeking politicians own pockets who are its masters now.

They also have a huge problem with the BNP

maintaining the "integrity of the indigenous British" and "restoring and maintaining" the indigenous British as "an overwhelming majority"

These mad marxist bastards find that, the wish for the British People to continue to exist, as being offensive to possible non-indigenous members as this would deny them their racial and cultural identity.  So f++k the British racial and cultural identity because they are no longer allowed to have an identity any longer.

And it is easy to see why the marxist would have a problem with new BNP members being welcomed into the Party by two BNP officials.  How much better to let nutcases, state agents, red provocateur join the party without check, so they can be used to bring the party into disrepute or destroy it from within.

Any person who cares about democracy must see that what the EHCR are doing here is morally wrong, if not downright illegal.  Regardless of whether you love or hate the BNP you must, if you care about Freedom of Speech and democracy help stop the EHCR dead in their tracks.

Listen Radio Red, White and Blue Interview with Richard Barnbrook on Goresbrook By-Election

Radio Red, White and Blue Interview with Richard Barnbrook on Goresbrook By-Election

  |  BNP News

Richard Barnbrook AM has called upon all activists to help out with the upcoming Goresbrook by-election in a breaking news interview with Radio Red, White and Blue.

“The response on the door is very positive,” Mr Barnbrook said. The by-election was called after the trade union supporter Labour candidate resigned only a matter of days after the election.

A quietly confidant but realistic Mr Barnbrook appealed for supporters to come down to Barking and Dagenham this weekend, for which accommodation is available.

Goresbrook ward was held by Mr Barnbrook until May this year and although the party is facing an uphill battle, he is determined to show that the BNP has not gone away.

Mr Barnbrook provides further details in the interview, conducted this morning, which can be found at the Radio RWB website’s breaking news section. Click here.

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect You:r BoltonHealth Services

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect You: Health Services

The domestic spending cuts — which are in marked contrast to the increased spending on foreign aid, EU membership and the war in Afghanistan — will directly reduce the number of healthcare professionals available to serve the British public.

According to the British Medical Association, the NHS faces “devastating cuts to jobs and patient services as the Government’s austerity drive hits the health service.”

A survey carried out for the BMA and recently released to the public found that “thousands of doctors and nurses face being made redundant or not replaced if they leave, while many hospitals have cut treatments.”

The BMA researchers asked 361 doctors, who between them represent committees at all of Britain’s hospital trusts and some larger primary care trusts, how the NHS was being affected by the demand to make £20 billion of cuts.

Around 43 percent of respondents confirmed that there was a “freeze” on doctor and nurse recruitment, despite increasing demand for services.

Another 40 percent of respondents said that patient treatments, including varicose vein operations and blood tests, were being “rationed.”

According to doctors in Bedfordshire, instructions have also been given not to refer patients with certain ailments, such as skin lesions and cysts, to hospitals “except in exceptional circumstances.”

Furthermore, the BMA said that 25 percent of respondents confirmed that their NHS Trust was planning to make workers redundant.

Chairman of the BMA, Dr Hamish Meldrum, said in the report that “Whilst we accept that difficult decisions need to be taken in this tight financial climate, there is a real danger that cutting back on health now will have a long-lasting impact on our ability to maintain high-quality, comprehensive and universal care in the future.”

The Royal College of Nursing said earlier this year that about 5,600 jobs were under threat across 26 hospital trusts. In a “worst case scenario”, the true figure could be as high as 30,000, it said.

* Figures from the NHS Information Centre, released in August last year, said that the health service was already facing “unsustainable pressure" as it struggled to recruit nurses and hospital doctors.

The figures, which analysed jobs unfilled as of March last year, found that 5.2 percent of all NHS medical posts, which includes hospital doctors and dentists, were vacant, up from 3.6 percent the previous year.

The proportion which had been vacant for three months, considered an indication of hard-to-fill posts, was 1.5 percent, up from 0.9 percent.

Vacant midwife positions also rose, from 2.1 to 3.4 percent. Of those, 1 percent were long-term vacancies, up from 0.8 percent.

The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has previously warned that England already needs an extra 5,000 midwives to provide an acceptable level of care.

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect Your Bolton Policing Services

How Domestic Budget Cuts Will Affect You: Policing Services

BNP Newsroom

The domestic spending cuts — which are in marked contrast to the increased spending on foreign aid, EU membership and the war in Afghanistan — will directly reduce the number of police officers despite rising crime figures.

According to the President of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), Sir Hugh Orde, it is "misleading in the extreme" to claim otherwise.

Addressing ACPO’s annual conference in Manchester, Sir Hugh said budget cuts would inevitably lead to a reduction in the number of police officers.

To suggest the size of the police service is sustainable, Sir Hugh said, is "misleading in the extreme... quite simply it is not."

“A balance must be struck between the understandable demand for more officers on the streets and the less visible, but equally critical duties they perform.

“Chief constables face hard choices over where to make savings and the government must take the lead.

Last week, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson said his force would "shrink" as a result of budget cuts.

* The budget cuts come at a time of increased crime in Britain, which is at least in part due to the immigration invasion which has disposed British people of many areas of the large cities.

Figures released earlier this year showed that immigrant-heavy London and Manchester accounted for 20 percent of all of Britain’s 15,000 “prolific and priority offenders.”

The third and fourth areas with the most prolific repeat offenders are the West Midlands and Nottinghamshire, both epicentres of the black gun crime plague.

The lowest number of regular offenders is found in Wiltshire, for reasons which are obvious.

Other statistics from the House of Commons Law Library released in March this year showed that violent attacks in Britain are 44 percent higher than they were in 1998. The study revealed that “violence against the person” increased from 618,417 to 887,942 last year.

Manchester BNP’s Derek Adams: “Losing Our Islands to Immigrantion

Manchester BNP’s Derek Adams: “Losing Our Islands”

Manchester British National Party’s super activist Derek Adams has launched his most powerful video yet, explaining in detail how Britain is being overrun through mass immigration and identifying the enemies who have brought about this disaster.

In the video, Mr Adams shows in graphic detail how British society has been changed from the once peaceful, cohesive community it was, into a multicultural nightmare.

The reasons given for the immigration invasion are analysed, dissected and shown to be nonsense.

The images of aliens voting in the recent "British" election are particularly shocking and will without doubt serve as a wake-up call to many who were unaware of just how bad the situation has become.

He ends off with an appeal to British people to join the British resistance – the BNP.

This is a sensational recruitment video and deserves the widest possible circulation. Send it to your friends, family and work colleagues. Do it today.

Well done to the BNP members in Salford

Salford BNP Makes Big Impact with “England for Life” Petition

The hardworking activists of Salford British National Party are back on the streets promoting the “England is for life, not just for football” petition which is proving to be highly popular, reports organiser Gary Tumulty.

“Over the last couple of weekends, the Salford team has been active in public precincts to personally thank voters for supporting the BNP during the recent election,” Mr Tumulty said. Some 2,632 people voted for Tina Wingfield, the brave BNP candidate.

“We also took our ‘England is for life, not just for football’ petition and leaflets out on the stalls,” Mr Tumulty continued.

“This campaign has gone down a real storm in Salford with many people signing up.”

Mr Tumulty said the response on the street was different even compared to that of the election.

“Salfordians cannot get enough of the Voice of Freedom newspaper, and we have given out hundreds of copies which in turn has led to a large number of subscribers,” he said.

“Information packs are also still in high demand. All party activists elsewhere in Britain can be assured that Salford BNP continues the fight to save our homeland.”