Join us in our recruitment campaign in Horwich and Bolton

Join us in our recruitment campaign

News Team at  http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Help recruit for the British National Party – distribute our We Want Our Country Back leaflet.

Do Your Bit – Help Spread the Word

The British National Party is going to print with a nationwide run of our new recruitment leaflet – and we need you to help spread the word.
Our We Want Our Country Back leaflet has already returned an excellent response during its trial run of 100,000, and now it is vital we spread its message of hope as far and wide as possible.
With this recruitment campaign, we can capitalize on the ‘soft’ support we received up and down the UK in this year’s elections.
We need to let everyone know there is a real alternative to the anti-British LibLabCon monopoly – and we need to do it now.
The hard-hitting leaflet explains where we stand on pensions, British Jobs for British Workers, family values, immigration and defence, among other issues.
It also calls for an English parliament, withdrawal from the EU, and a ban on ritually slaughtered meat.
All British National Party groups and branches are asked to contact dispatch manager Alwyn Deacon at dispatch@bnp.org.uk or on 0844 809 4582 to place their orders so we can adjust our print run accordingly.
The price of the full-colour A4 leaflet is £20 per 1,000, plus postage and packing.

Individual supporters are also encouraged to order leaflets for distribution. 

Prices are:
100 leaflets: £3 (including P&P)
250 leaflets: £7.50 (including P&P)
500 leaflets: £15 (including P&P)
1,000 leaflets: £25 (including P&P)
2,000 leaflets: £45 (including P&P)

Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish versions of the leaflet are also available, but due to the economy of scale in printing, the price will be on application depending on the amount ordered.
This simple, attractive leaflet is a fantastic recruiting tool for our party – but only if enough patriotic Britons like you help us get it to as many of our countrymen as possible.
Please help do your bit for Britain, while we still have a country left to save.
You can also download the leaflet by clicking here and print it off on your own printer and give them to friends and family. Also email the leaflet to everyone in your address book.
Those British National Party activists with a RISO printer please print a master copy from the PDF and use that to print your own black and white versions of this leaflet.
P.S. Another great way to help the British National Party is to set up a standing order mandate and give the price of a pint regularly. Please download the standing order mandate here: http://www.bnp.org.uk/PDF/StandingOrder_Mandate2.pdf print it of, fill it in and post it to British Heritage, PO Box 213, Wigton, Cumbria CA7 7AL.

UK Taxpayers sucked into the Eurozone black hole

Taxpayers sucked into the Eurozone black hole

  Martin Wingfield  at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

Now they have landed on a big snake.  Yesterday, top ratings agency Standard & Poor’s – as we predicted – officially confirmed that the sundry finagles and wangles Brussels and Paris have cooked up to fudge Greece missing payments due on its debts, cut no ice with them.

If the Greeks don't meet the original due date and amount for any repayment to one of the numerous big Euro banks to which they owe huge sums of money, that debt will be declared by S&P as 'in default'.  Other top global ratings agencies are almost certain to follow suit.
This means that any such debts automatically legally turn from an asset to a liability on the affected bank’s books.  So great are the amounts involved that for a number of big banks, notably in France and Germany, that would transform them, at the stroke of a pen, from solvent to insolvent. They then must either cease trading or, as in 2008, be bailed out by their hoist country’s taxpayers, causing another Bankers’ Slump in the only parts of the Eurozone not already in economic meltdown.
Not surprisingly, the markets greeted the news by downgrading the affected banks’ share prices - in France Credit Agricole and Societe Generale fell about 2%, while in Germany Commerzbank slipped 1.7%.  British-based banks are not immune either – Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds shares fell 2.3%, reflecting their exposure to Greek debt and the danger that British taxpayers will be sucked into the Eurozone black hole.
This all means that the latest £10.4 billion bailout loans the Greeks got last weekend in return for doing as they are told will not be enough.  The only way now to avoid a Greek default and a string of bank collapses would be if the European Central Bank – the Bank of the Euro – took on the burden of the debt.
This won’t happen as the actual cost would fall ruinously on the German taxpayer, who would revenge themselves savagely at the polls on the current German Government whose Chancellor Angela Merkel has made it very clear that she will not lay down her political life for the Euro.
This enthralling drama continues apace . .

The clash between the political elites and the people of Europe

The clash between the political elites and the people

  Martin Wingfield at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

The collapse of the Euro came still another step nearer on Thursday of last week when the European Central Bank raised interest rates by 0.25%, its second such rise this year.
The rise helps the German and other Northern European Eurozone economies by preventing 'overheating' but it will strike a further blow to the already suffering Southern European eurozone economies such as Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy, by pushing them nearer to defaulting on their colossal debts.

As the British National Party has repeatedly pointed out over the past five years, the Euro is an economic impossibility. That's because a single currency can only possibly work in a single economy with a single fiscal and monetary policy - and all that needs a single government!

Different economies trapped in a single currency have different, in fact now diametrically opposite, fiscal and monetary needs. Germany which has a growing economy, with manufacturing orders rising another 1.8% in June, needs a higher interest rate to curb inflation.
Greece and Portugal, on the other hand, with economies which are contracting, need lower interest rates to stimulate demand and investment and get things moving again.  The only way some sort of common currency can work is if more power is given to a single governing body.

The Old Euro is failing because one currency can't work for 17 still basically independent nations. For a New Euro to prosper, such independence must be brought to an end. There would have to be central European Union control of every aspect of economic policy throughout the Eurozone.

Brussels would have to impose taxes, determine public spending, and make laws on and exert complete control over every aspect of economic or fiscal matters, for all the countries signing up to the new Euro.

The growing support for nationalist parties in every country in the EU shows that the European peoples will not accept the loss of their independence without a fight. Like the USSR and its Empire in 1989, the European Union is now approaching its final crisis - the clash between political elites lusting for transnational power and ordinary people seeking to win back their freedom.

Muslim Posters Declare Parts of London are Sharia Controlled Zones

Muslim Posters Declare Parts of London are Sharia Controlled Zones

Should we be surprised? 

Reposted - link in title

London Is A Shariah-Controlled Zone

A reader in London just sent  the following photo, which is fairly self-explanatory:

He included this note:

Please see attached a poster seen stuck on to a bus stop on corner of Mission Grove and Carisbrooke Road, London E17. Signs of subtlety in the message — avoiding items that might be thought of as controversial like killing homosexuals and stuffing women in bags.

I’ve extracted the poster from the image and removed the foreshortening to make a more readable copy:

  

Challenging the Immoral Liberal ‘Experts’ and Their Claims

Challenging the Immoral Liberal ‘Experts’

  

By Maid of Kent –
In a report in last Friday’s Independent newspaper on the exploding population growth in the UK, the paper published an ‘expert’ analysis by their Economics Editor Sean O’Grady to soften the appalling statistics.
After reporting the shocking population growth of nearly half a million people last year alone in our tiny island, the article stated that the UK population is growing at its fastest rate for half a century and went on to add that there are 200,000 more women of child-bearing age in Britain than ten years ago, many of whom were born abroad and who tend to have larger families than British women of child-bearing age.
While carefully publishing select figures that they deemed suitable for public knowledge in order to mask the number of those half a million people who were new immigrants to our country in that year and how many of the 134,000 more births last year than in 2001 were to immigrants and non-indigenous people, the Independent backed up their version of this news with O’Grady’s ‘expert’ economic analysis titled ‘The more people who come to the UK, the better it is for us all’.
Ignoring the fact that we have many unemployed people here who cannot find work because the jobs don’t exist, O’Grady seeks to use the expert status that his position as Economics Editor implies to brainwash readers into blindly accepting his ideologically perverted opinion as unarguable fact.
Shockingly for someone who writes for a supposedly liberal newspaper, O’Grady makes the offensive claim that without illegal immigrants working as cleaners, hotel staff and taxi drivers, London’s thriving tourist trade would collapse.
Ignoring any suspicions that a reader may have on the implications of such a comment, that O’Grady is either suggesting that the indigenous British people are now incapable of doing such work or that the jobs are so menial that only illegal immigrants will do them, O’Grady appears to be quite comfortable with the idea of accepting illegal immigrants in our country and working in British jobs as long as an industry profits from the situation.
So perverted has the Liberal ideology become that a supposedly respectable national newspaper like The Independent can publish the suggestion that we support immoral criminal behaviour by encouraging illegal immigrants to enter our country with the tacit understanding that they will work for unlawful wages which, with the high costs of living in our capital city, amount to slave labour. Slave labourers who need to live in garden sheds in our capital city to provide for the profitability of industry and the associated gang masters who profit from their misery. A surprising thought from a supposedly Liberal national newspaper which always seeks to hold the moral high ground.
While most of The Independent’s readers will assume that O’Grady makes such claims because of low wages paid to illegal immigrants, therefore keeping costs low which would aid the profitability of the tourist industry, his argument is disingenuous because surely as an Economics Editor he is aware of the enormous hidden costs to the tax payer of such low-paid illegal immigrants?
Further, O’Grady’s suggestion that we ‘need’ the labour of illegal immigrants to make an industry viable has dangerous implications for the future. With the spiralling costs of all public services caused by the influx of immigrants, legal and illegal, how long before people with O’Grady’s morally flawed political viewpoint suggest that we need illegal immigrants to staff our hospitals and schools and other services?
How long before it is acceptable to O’Grady that we have unchecked illegal immigrants working as doctors and surgeons in our hospitals, as teachers in our schools, as MPs in Westminster and even as Economics Editors employed by national newspapers?
Having been sucked into the Liberal/Marxist ideology, O’Grady is unable to acknowledge or even recognise that the flawed and immoral policies of the traitors whom he and his readership have supported – and still support – are now logically leading to the ‘need’ for further immoral steps, such as the tacit approval of the employment of criminal illegal immigrants in order to keep the whole system working, and reveal the brainwashing of supposedly intelligent people like O’Grady who are hailed as experts in their fields, when their only expertise is their ability to slant reality to suit their ideological views with the result that bad becomes good and good becomes bad.
Experts such as this, who choose to ignore the uncomfortable facts which reveal the enormous flaws inherent in their ideology and who promote their own version of reality by manipulating facts and ultimately applauding immoral and illegal activities.
Furthermore, that O’Grady appears to support the employment of illegal immigrants in an industry where genuine overseas visitors will be exposed and put at risk by them is criminally irresponsible. Genuine visitors from overseas who have already been scammed by the British authorities because they were sold the premise that they were visiting Britain and are shocked to discover upon their arrival here that, due to mass immigration, there is little evidence of being in Britain, O’Grady seems to suggest that it is acceptable to have these visitors exposed to the dangers of being driven by unlicensed and uninsured illegal immigrant taxi drivers and that it is acceptable for them to be exposed to illegal immigrant cleaners and hotel staff who, because of their situation, may be tempted to steal.
Such is the thoughtless and selfish ‘morality’ of the liberal supporters of Marxism.
In the same ‘expert’ analysis, while paying scant acknowledgement to the social and financial damage caused to our country by the Lib/Lab/Con policies of mass immigration, which O’Grady glosses over as a minor problem, he tries to justify these policies by spouting the same old lies that have long been exposed as such.
Using the argument that these immigrants will pay for our pensions when Gordon Brown destroyed the private pensions of millions just to finance the policy of mass immigration is surely such an outdated argument that anyone using it loses all credibility. Yet this financial ‘expert’ expects his readers to accept it blindly as truth.
That O’Grady can even suggest that immigrants will pay our pensions at a time like this when public sector employees are seeing cuts to theirs and the rest of us will suffer a poverty-stricken retirement – if we get to retire at all – is beyond belief.
Following on in his ‘expert’ analysis of why we need mass immigration, O’Grady argues that these immigrants ‘rejuvenate’ our population as they are young, flexible, enterprising, able to work and determined to build a new life in our country.
However, he doesn’t address the reasons why he thinks that native Britons cannot be attributed with the same merits and doesn’t appear to realise that his assertions favouring immigrants could be construed as racist.
He also doesn’t make clear why immigrants to this country should have these gifts when they were apparently unable to produce such rejuvenating results in their countries of origin.
While O’Grady’s opinion is that we supposedly ‘need’ millions of immigrants to address the demographic imbalance in our native population, ignoring the reasons for that imbalance is dishonest. O’Grady surely knows that the criminal and irresponsible abuse of the Welfare system allowed and encouraged by the Lib/Lab/Con politicians which made ordinary British workers pay unaffordable amounts in taxation to support lazy and feckless people led to the situation where those tax paying workers could not afford to have children of their own or had to severely limit the size of their families?
He must also be aware that the same easily abused Welfare system has led to the death of enterprise and determination among the young of the indigenous population, who see the comfortable lives of those on benefits as an easy path to follow. Taking into account the dismal education of our children caused by the policies of the Lib/Lab/Con politicians, where they are not equipped with the knowledge needed to lead successful lives in our economy, his lauding of immigrants’ abilities and enterprise is difficult to swallow.
Especially when the children of such immigrants will receive the same dismal education and will also be exposed to the same corrupting influences of our easily abused welfare system.
The real question raised by O’Grady’s expert economics analysis – one that he doesn’t answer – is when he declares that the more people who come to the UK, the better it will be for us all.
Just how many immigrants does this ‘expert’ O’Grady think it will take to make it better for us all?
Will it be ‘better’ when we have a population of 100 million? 200 million? Perhaps 500 million will satisfy the so-called Liberal elite like O’Grady?
Can he possibly explain why he believes that mass immigration is ‘better for us all’ when, after the importation of more immigrants into our country in the last 65 years than ever before in our history, we are a financially bankrupt nation?
It is the duty of the British National Party – a duty that we do not shrink from – to expose the flaws and deep immorality of the ideologies that so-called experts like O’Grady attempt to promote as the only answer to Britain’s problems, when it is those same ideologies that have caused them.

Join and Rejoin the British National Party Today!

Rejoin the British National Party Today!

News Team at http://bnp.org.uk/

The British National Party are the only political force willing to stand up and fight for the innocent children being abused, hooked on heroin and raped by an alien invader – the Islamic Extremists that hate us, our culture and our religion. 

We are fighting a war on the streets of Britain, and it is a war we cannot afford to lose.
Muslim Paedophile Grooming Gangs are abusing our children, and no one is prepared to stand up for these abused children but us. This is fast becoming the fight of our generation.
Out of sight, out of mind?
Will you stand by and watch from the sidelines?
Or will you rejoin the British National Party and together fight this and other battles side by side with your brothers and sisters for our cause – the rights and safety of the British People?

That's why, despite the dangers and the hardship, we haven't gone away.
We answer a real need, and our support is strong and deep.
If we are to win future battles in this continuing war, I need your help.
I need you to rejoin the British National Party and be part of the team that will work to turn the anger of the alienated indigenous people against the politicians that have betrayed everyone.

I cannot do it on my own. I need you to help.
When you renew your membership, it sends a message of hope to the people abandoned by the police, the courts and the politicians of Britain.
When you renew your membership, it sends a message of hope to the pensioners and war heroes who feel like strangers in their own land.
When you renew your membership, it sends a message of hope to our beleaguered communities all over this country.
When you renew your membership, it sends a message of defiance to the Islamic Extremists who seek our peoples’ destruction.
It tells them that despite their very best efforts, there are British people who can, and will, fight back, no matter what the odds!

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party
To rejoin by phone, call 0844 809 4581. To rejoin by post, print off the renewal form by clicking here, and post to The Secretary, PO Box 213, Wigton, Cumbria CA7 7AL.
PS: You can also help by the simple act of sending three email addresses of like-minded people who would be happy to receive our messages of hope. Please email them to: admin@bnp.org.uk

Shockwaves Around the World ! Could America default on its debt?

Could America default on its debt?

  News Team at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

By James North –
America currently has a massive $14.3 trillion of public debt and is in the midst of a political struggle that could send shockwaves around the world.
In order for America not to default on payments to maintain its levels of debt, congress needs to arrange a plan to increase the limit that America is allowed to borrow. Under current legislation, America is allowed to borrow as much as it likes but sets parameters as safeguards.
However, due to the current financial situation, America has found that it will need to borrow above and beyond those self-inflicted limits aptly named the 'debt ceiling'.
This, of course, causes a problem: Republicans and Democrats are divided as to whether to vote in favour of raising these limits. If an agreement isn't met soon, we could see America begin to default on its payments by as early as August 2nd this year.
What would that mean to citizens in America and around the world? We could see America facing some tough decisions on where its money is spent: welfare payments, defence costs, state pensions and education could all be hit. This would mark the first time in history that the world’s wealthiest nation was unable to pay its debts.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has made a statement saying, "If no agreement could be reached, there could be a severe shock to the economy and to world financial markets." There is also a risk that America’s debt could be downgraded from its current triple-A status, which would cause huge ramifications for anyone holding these investments.
The actual chances of a default are slim. President Obama has cut short a week-long Independence Day break for congress so that they can debate the issue, with many expecting an eleventh-hour deal to be reached. However, it is very worrying that America has found itself in this position, and it is a harsh wakeup call of what the future may hold. 
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British national Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Blatantly Biased Corporation Known as the BBC Admits Ignoring Immigration

BBC Admits Ignoring Immigration

   News Team at  http://www.bnp.org.uk/

By Stephen Palmer –
The BBC’s director general has admitted that the corporation has avoided speaking about the problems of ‘taboo’ subjects such as immigration.
Mark Thompson said ‘sensitive and difficult issues’ like immigration were ignored because the broadcaster was ‘anxious’ about appearing to have a right-wing agenda.
In an article for the New Statesman magazine, he admitted: ‘There have been occasions, I believe, in the past, when the BBC has had limitations.
‘For example, I think there were some years when the BBC, like the rest of the UK media, was very reticent about talking about immigration.
‘There was an anxiety whether or not you might be playing into a political agenda if you did items about immigration.’
He went on to justify the BBC’s behaviour by saying that in the 2010 election campaign, ‘none of the parties was talking about immigration’, despite the fact that immigration was one of the main issues of the election, with the LibLabCon party making continual transparent promises on the issue to try and steal votes from the British National Party.
The less-than-shocking announcement is just the latest in a series of admissions of anti-British bias by the corporation.
- In 2006, a leaked report from a BBC ‘impartiality seminar’ found that BBC executives would broadcast a Bible being thrown into a bin, but not a Koran.
- In the same report, the station’s political editor Andrew Marr said, ‘The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It's a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias.’
- Former BBC business editor Jeff Randall was quoted in the report as saying he complained to a 'very senior news executive' about the BBC's pro-multicultural stance but was given the reply, 'The BBC is not neutral in multiculturalism: it believes in it and it promotes it.'
- In 2007, a BBC Trust report criticised the corporation for coming late to several important stories, including Euroscepticism and immigration, which it described as ‘off limits’ in terms of a liberal-minded comfort zone.
- In 2010, again speaking to the left-wing New Statesman, Mark Thompson accepted that the BBC had been guilty of a ‘massive bias to the left’ and ‘struggled with impartiality’.
- In January 2011, ex-BBC newsreader Peter Sissons went further by stating that left-wing bias was written in the corporation’s very DNA.
Mark Thompson has been the BBC’s director general since 2004, taking over from Greg Dyke, who infamously bemoaned the company for being ‘hideously white’.
In the interview, Mr Thompson also defended the large numbers of journalists the BBC sends to events such as Glastonbury and the Olympics. The BBC was criticised last month for sending 407 people to the Glastonbury festival – at a cost of £1.5 million.

How to campaign against a mosque planning application in Your Area

How to campaign against a mosque planning application

News Team http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Nick Griffin has urged community activists to use advice being offered by the Law and Freedom Foundation on how to oppose an application for a mosque in their area.

Mr Griffin said that it is ‘vital’ that people ‘campaign against the threat to our values and way of life’.

Here is the advice:

1. Start Your Action Group
You will need a core group within the campaign. You can’t do this all on your own!
The more you publicise the campaign, the more support you will get, and people will respond better if they can see that you are organised.
Councils also take notice of the fact that there’s an action group that people have formed on this issue. All you need to do is create a header in Word, e.g. “Action for XYZ Location”. Then assign jobs to people – doorstepping, press, organising letter-writing.
A petition can get the attention of the media, but Local Authorities often ignore them. But a very large number of signatures will get attention.

2. Hold public meetings, and invite the press
These are necessary for raising motivation and letting people know they're not alone, and generating face-to-face loyalty.
When fixing meetings, don’t expect any help from Local Authorities. They fear the support you can generate, but won’t help. And be careful of the press, who know they can generate publicity by painting you in a bad light. Prepare statements in advance: compassion for Muslims as the first victims of Islam, but opposition to Islam and Islamic doctrine which is supremacist in nature.

3. Get writing letters to the Local Authority (letters have more weight than petitions)
This is the hard part, getting people to write letters to the Council. And then getting them to write to the Council again if the planning application is re-submitted.
You can’t write the letters for people, but you can give them grounds which they might like to include in their letters.
You have to give them contact details for the officer to write to at the Council. It takes a lot of effort to get people to write, but it’s worth it because Councils take notice of letters.

4. Legal and policy argument
It is useful to have a legal analysis of planning policy for the site, to give technical support as to why the site would be more suited to something else. This will often include traffic and congestion.
However, I think the main argument should be on principle – that there are enough mosques in the area and the country, and that Islamic doctrine is discriminatory and hate filled and, therefore, contrary to law. And that the Local Authority or Planning Inspectorate doesn't have the power to grant planning permission for an unlawful use such as this.
It's important to keep the campaigning side on the front foot, and the same is true of the legal side. You have nothing to apologise for, and nothing to be defensive about.
You have every right and duty to defend that tradition of law and freedom at home.
 

EU Eurocrats Condemn Denmark for Defending Its Borders

Eurocrats Condemn Denmark for Defending Its Borders

  News Team at  http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Denmark’s decision to increase the number of customs officers on its borders today has been met with immediate condemnation from ‘liberal’ opposition.
Danish authorities have supplemented the number of border staff in order to combat the importation of illegal goods and drugs – but multiculturalists in Germany and the EU have said the measures are not in the ‘spirit’ of the border-free Schengen Agreement.
German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle, of the Free Democratic Party, told reporters that his government is ‘very critical of Denmark's decision to re-establish permanent customs checks at the border with Germany’.

He added that it could be ‘the writing on the wall for freedom in Europe’.
Another FDP politician, Jörg-Uwe Hahn, even urged Germans to boycott Denmark by going on holiday to Austria or Poland in order to hurt the country financially.
But the Danish tax minister, Peter Christensen, said the initiative was needed to reduce crime:
‘It’s been proven that illegal merchandise is being smuggled into Denmark. Cross-border criminality should not enjoy freedom of movement,’ he said.
The Danish government added 50 extra customs agents to its national boundaries in order to reduce the amount of illegal goods and drugs out of the country. Thirty staff were stationed on the German land border and twenty more on sea borders with Germany and Sweden.
The new measures were approved on Friday by the coalition government, which relies on the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party for support, ahead of a general election later this year.
The European Commission has been in daily contact with Danish authorities, and according to the Commissioner for Home Affairs, Cecilia Malmström, the Commission will be carefully investigating every detail of the plan to ensure that Denmark is not breaking EU laws regarding the right to free movement of people and goods within the EU.
But the Danish government has insisted customs officers will not be checking passports, and that the plan is compatible with Schengen rules.
Danish tax and customs administration director Erling Andersen said the move was a matter of reinforced customs control:
‘We will go after illegal import of, among other things, narcotics, weapons and large amounts of money, precisely as we do today,’ he said.
‘There will not be any systematic control of all vehicles and trains that pass the border, and the controls will be carried out with the least possible disturbance to traffic.
‘In two to three years, there will be customs officers on duty round-the-clock. But that doesn't mean that we will make checks round-the-clock.’
Customs controls will gradually be strengthened to include new buildings at crossings, lower speed limits at checkpoints and new equipment for reading license plates of passing vehicles. By the end of 2011, it is planned that a total of 98 additional customs officers will join the country's 182-man force at the borders with Germany and Sweden.
Remarkably, the stopping of the first car entering Denmark under the new rules was subject to a mob of photographers and live media coverage, as a Western country daring to defend its borders, if only to a small degree, made headline news.
Get Britain out of the EU now – Sign our petition here: http://www.bnp.org.uk/petitions/ReferendumNow