Pravda (Channel 4) and the UK Marxist Police state 2011

Pravda (Channel 4) and the UK Police state 2011

Written by Sarah Albion

When Asian and Turkish people gather to protect their shops and businesses against rioters, they are praised by the media for "protecting their community". Meanwhile, white hating liberal's like Christina Odone, a woman's who's one time editorship of the Catholic Herald reduced it to something mostly suitable for lining a parrot's cage, write articles like this, praising the immigrants for, as she puts it, “loving this country more than we do”. Meanwhile when whites assemble to protect their communities, such as happened in Eltham, they are called “thugs” and “vigilantes”. Police arrive en-masse and deliberately, albeit relatively unsuccessfully, attempt to provoke violence, in order to cause a "white riot", whilst the lying scum from Channel 4, who had obviously been invited to the show, produce a dishonest and misleading report like this one. On the TV news report, it was claimed that white residents "attacked the police" however, despite the presence of TV cameras, this was not shown, in fact apart from close up film of one broken bottle (who knows who threw it, or when), no evidence of violence was shown. It was also claimed that people were shouting "racist abuse" although this was also not shown. There was no trouble in Eltham, the police attempted to provoke white residents into violence for propaganda purposes, however, apart from, maybe, on frustrated bottle thrower, they did not succeed. Meanwhile so called “journalists” attempted draw an equivalence between the predominantly black rioters, and the peaceful white residents of Eltham. This is what passes for “truth”, "justice" and “news reporting” in England in 2011. __________________ Related (and amusing) article on Simon Darby's site here.

Cameron the The Sick Man of Britain

The Sick Man of Britain

British Prime Minister David Cameron was forced to return early from his holiday in sunny Tuscany in order to deal with the sudden descent of several major English cities into violence, looting, arson, and anarchy.

On Thursday, when he spoke to members of Parliament about the crisis, this is what he said about the members of the English Defence League who defended their communities:

“The hon. Gentleman speaks not only for his constituents, but, frankly, for the whole House in deprecating the English Defence League and all it stands for. On its attempt to say that it will somehow help to restore order, I have described some parts of our society as sick, and there is none sicker than the EDL.”

The EDL has understandably taken exception to the Prime Minister’s characterization of them. Below is a statement by Brian of London, as posted at the EDL website:

No Mr Cameron, It’s You Who Are Sick
by Brian of London

Yesterday, in Parliament, after MPs were hastily recalled from their exotic holidays for emergency “jaw jaw” following the worst rioting England has seen for decades. Over a thousand of the scummiest criminals around have been arrested, with hundreds more expected to follow. Rioters attacked police, burnt down businesses and homes (some with people still inside), violently mugged innocent people, stole tens of millions of pounds worth of goods and even killed people. Yet David Cameron, the supposed ultimate representative of the public, chose to lie and attack the EDL.

In a hate-filled speech full of inaccuracies, he stated,

“I think the honourable gentleman speaks not only for his constituents but quite frankly for the whole house in deprecating the EDL and all they stand for — and their attempt to somehow say that they’re going to help restore order is…. sick, and there’s none sicker than the EDL”

All we stand for? Have you read our Mission Statement lately? We suspect not. No sane person could say it is sick to oppose terrorism, sexism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, integration and equality. How are you feeling, Dave? Better check your private health insurance policy, you’re looking a bit peaky.

Firstly, the minor disturbances in Eltham last night were NOT the EDL, according to the police that were there, and as they communicated to BBC Radio 5. David Cameron is now actively ignoring the police force of this country, in an attempt to further demonise the predominantly white working class people of this country.

People are entitled to protect their homes and businesses from severe attacks. The police weren’t protecting the people of these areas, so local people went onto the streets to make sure they wouldn’t become the latest victims of such horrific attacks. Be they the Sikhs of Southall, the Muslims of Birmingham, or the English of Eltham.

When it comes down to it, the only thing we are all forced to rely on is the government for its protection from violence and crime: we’re actually prohibited from arming ourselves, so we’re helpless. If a government presides over civil war as we saw, it has failed totally in its most important duty.

What is clear to see from the media reports and reactions of journalists and politicians is that they simply do not care about the proud English folk of this land. Many communities came together on Tuesday night, regardless of colour, with Black and White from numerous backgrounds, uniting to force away the rioters:

One particular group on Tuesday did have some EDL in it, and patriotic songs were sung. The locals were delighted that they were now being protected after police failures and shortcomings [Guardian Video]. The media were quick to jump on this and heap praise on the group as the spirit of England was on show, but once it came to light that some EDL may have been involved, the story was turned to imply they were racist and violent. This despite the presence of black men in the group and despite the lack of any violence whatsoever.

The same journalists gave a different account of the Sikh and Muslim groups who bravely defended their areas. The Sikh groups were publicly brandishing swords and weapons, something that would have resulted in the immediate arrest of any EDL member, we’re sure. No, these groups were lauded with praise and branded as heroes. Where is the equality?

Don’t get us wrong, we do endorse the use of self defence, in particular when rioters intent on using all manner of violent acts (which will include the carrying of weapons and the intent to use them) have to be met “head on” in times of abject police and government failure. They have allowed Anarchy to rule our streets, something the militant left have been provoking for many years now. We must pay particular attention to the case in North London, whereby locals have had to endure more than five nights of continued violence on the streets. Is it any wonder the locals are turning to people who do stand up for the love of their country and their communities in times of civil unrest?

Wednesday night saw similar scenes across the country, with vigilante groups protecting their streets once again. Obviously, because these groups were peaceful, law abiding and predominantly white English, the police were now miraculously able to find officers to over-police the peacefulness and intimidate people. In Manchester and Birmingham, the police had the numbers and time to surround hundreds of unmasked, peaceful citizens and issue them all with section 6s and 27s (orders to disperse well known to many EDL members from football crowd policing). Why were the groups of rioters not dispersed at early opportunities, when they were masked and intent on violence?

In Eltham, some news stations were reporting 1000 riot police and 80 riot vans, not to stop the rioters, but to surround a small group of 100 locals. A bottle or two was thrown, a sign of the frustration that these police who were nowhere when wanton destruction and theft were occurring, were suddenly appearing in mass numbers to intimidate and provoke a groups of previously peaceful people. No damage was caused and the locals went back to their homes, safe in the knowledge that police were finally on their streets, even if it wasn’t to stop the mindless criminals. This didn’t stop media outlets from lying about events, with The Telegraph criticising the EDL in depth for the whole incident and ending with… Local police denied the group were comprised of EDL members.

A massive police over-reaction to deal with non-criminals, a scene we see far too often these days, with the white English population seemingly viewed as fair game and an easy target for the police. Anyone remember the horrific police brutality at Rochdale? Police officers assaulted young women and sent dogs into the crowd to attack people, who were peacefully standing on the grass as ordered by the police. At the same time allowing the Muslim group opposite to wreak havoc and attack them. Well, perhaps if the police were to use such brutal tactics on criminals, for a change, then the wanton destruction and theft might have ended days earlier, negating the need for vigilante groups and preventing the murder of the three young Muslims in Birmingham (our thoughts and prayers go out to the families).

There is no issue here, especially no issue with the EDL. The English Defence League are here to DEFEND England when no-one else is willing to. On this occasion the police weren’t willing to defend and protect the streets and residents of some parts of England. The public needed help, so they turned to the EDL, as we are increasingly seeing, naturally, EDL supporters took to the streets, peacefully supporting local residents and businesses.

There is nothing extremist, far-right, criminal or wrong about doing that. It shows the community spirit and big society that Mr Cameron keeps banging on about, expecting people of England to volunteer to help their communities. This is exactly what you saw Mr Cameron, your BIG society, and now you are attacking the volunteers? Why is that? These volunteers showed tremendous moral courage doing what they did, unlike the criminals.

How about showing some respect to ALL who deserve it, rather than slamming innocent people who were only standing up after your disastrous handling of the situation. A few more days in the sun, more important than the safety of Britain and its people? You are one disgusting creature, Mr Cameron — when will you wake up and realise that the government has repeatedly let down the British folk of this country, and that people are turning to us, rather than the authorities with their concerns because the authorities are too weak-willed to confront the causation of civil unrest. We listen to people’s concerns and give them a voice, rather than dismissing them and ignorantly shouting “racist”, when it’s nothing of the sort. Mr Cameron, you are out of touch with the British public, it’s about time you started listening to us rather than blaming us for YOUR failures.

Time to get a grip of the situation, we think!

Surviving Enoch's Prophecy

Surviving Enoch's Prophecy

Written by David Hamilton

People are too frightened to speak out about what is being done to them and their families or express their fears for the future. If they live near immigrants they blot anxiety out and pretend everything is alright. If someone gets mugged or raped nearby they are relieved because it did not happen to them. They avoid subways and many other hides for muggers that the planners built into their stupid housing schemes. You only have to go a couple of miles from affected areas and people are oblivious to what is happening because the elites are browbeating them into thinking things are fine. If they have had experience of the reality when they go to unaffected areas they won't speak about it for fear of condemnation. They are frightened to look into the future and what natural care they have for their children has to be repressed. As Enoch put it:"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see." There are characteristic features of invasion: immigrants and their descendants are taking over our communities and our religious symbols are being replaced mainly by Muslim symbols: churches converted to mosques and Christians forbidden to wear crucifixes at work! Contemporary elites must know what Sharia Law is and are aware of the widespread child-rape of young British girls by Muslim communities yet they are delivering our women into servitude under Sharia Law. Many evil Judges campaign for it. In December 2008 the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, told the London Muslim Council he was willing to have Sharia law in this country, so long as it did not conflict with the laws of England and Wales , or lead to the imposition of severe physical punishments. In the same month evil Lady Butler-Sloss, England 's first female Appeal Court judge, called for ministers to change the law for Muslims, so that a decree absolute could not be issued by a civil court until evidence had been obtained of a Sharia divorce. Delivering women to Sharia Law is a cruel wicked act. This is encouraged by dishonourable Christian leaders like the Archbishop of Canterbury. Enoch warned of The Enemy Within and that our internal enemies could not believe their luck with mass immigration. It gave them the forces of revolution. It is not outside forces that threatened us but traitors who pretend to act in our interests while they surrender us to Islam. This process can be researched under under "Eurabia". The Revolutionary Vanguard is not poised to strike but in power! What was to come was predicted by Enoch who saw similar symptoms in Northern Ireland: “Yet even though that picture is dark and darkening, there is one factor which has not yet been injected... That factor is firearms and explosives. With communities which are so divided nothing can prevent the injection of explosives which we know perfectly well from experience in other parts of the United Kingdom and the world. At first there will be horrified astonishment, and inquiry as to what we have done wrong that such things should be happening. Then there will be feverish endeavour to find methods to allay the supposed grievances which lie behind the violence. Then follows exploitation by those who use violence of the ascendancy they have thus gained over the majority and over authority. The thing goes forward, acting and reacting, until a position is reached in which—I shall dare say it—compared with those areas, Belfast today will seem an enviable place.” The open war begun on July 2005 when Young Muslims blew up London buses. There are hundreds of investigations being undertaken into Muslim "terrorists" but the elites are still importing them at half a million a year! Enoch warned: “Then there are the 'no-go' areas ... areas in the United Kingdom where the Queen's writ does not run ... If these areas were described as what they are—namely, pockets of territory occupied by the enemy, as surely as if they had been captured and held by parachute troops—then perhaps it would be realised how preposterous is the situation. In fact the policy of refraining from the re-establishment of civil government in these areas is as wise as it would be to leave enemy posts undisturbed behind one's lines.” This situation has been brought mainland Britain by the elites. The same corrupt elites have passed race laws and established a totalitarian bureaucracy under the doublespeak title of Equalities and Human Rights Commission to suppress the rebellion of indigenous people and to allow immigrants to replace us. Even during the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq the elites were encouraging them to immigrate. What would people have thought during the last war if 1500 Germans a week were being allowed into the country? To prevent the masses realising what is happening the elites invent misleading terms for terrorists like “ Un-Islamic activity” when it is a war carried out against us from within. The EU is importing hostile Muslim youth to Europe – prepare for the racial-civil wars of Europe. Nothing happens in politics by accident, and this is the greatest treason in history. Roughly 80% of the population are opposed to immigration and always have been and for over thirty years this has been shown in opinion polls!. Recently Gordon Brown admitted there is a consensus among mainstream parties in favour of immigration. The dominant political elites are at war with the native population. Immigration has no legitimacy and we have both a moral and legal duty to reverse it. Its complicated by each different group hating each other - Somalians hating West Indians; Pakistanis hating Indians; West Indians and Somalians hating Asians; Indians hating West Indians; Poles hating Russians and Latvians. There are historical examples of one group invading but our contemporary situation is several ethnic groups deliberately brought here and all waging war against us in different ways. Yet each way clearly shows the nature of the attacks which are masked by terms like “Black on White" crime but are actually race wars against Whites. The number of White woman assaulted, raped and murdered by Blacks is so high it can only be described as a Race War. The widespread gang-rapes of White girls often as young as 12 by older Muslims is an act of War by different means – guerrilla war. There has been much censorship to impose the dispossession on native people. Like China our elites use official censorship to prevent rebellion through the internet! An Internet censorship bill passed the House of Commons allows government to restrict and filter any website that is deemed to be undesirable for public consumption. This is not through the Lords yet but as they are placemen it will probably go through. The Sunday Times ( London ) June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, a senior military strategist has warned that “Europe, including Britain , could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight. The warnings by Parry of what could threaten Britain over the next 30 years were delivered to senior officers and industry experts at a conference ... “Globalisation makes assimilation seem redundant and old-fashioned … the process acts as a sort of reverse colonisation, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communication on phones and the internet.” Lord Boyce, the former chief of the defence staff, welcomed Parry’s analysis. “Bringing it together in this way shows we have some very serious challenges ahead,” he said. “The real problem is getting them taken seriously at the top of the government.” How have the decadent, emasculate authorities responded? Chief of the Armed forces, General Sir David Richards, launched an organisation for Muslims in the armed forces - The Armed Forces Muslim Association. How many al-Qaeda supporters are in the British military? There are at least 8 in the police and the police refuse to remove them! The violent ethnic cleansing of Whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa is beginning here. Because the media keep the truth from the public we only find it on the fringes: I got this revealing information from Jack Black’s “I am an Englishman” blog. It becomes obvious if you research the real figures that we Whites are victims of a vicious race war. I had correspondence from a young man who was a firm supporter of multi-racialism until the EDL demonstration against the Dudley mosque and went to look. When he got within a quarter of a mile he was issued with a Dispersement Order by the police. Later as he made his way back he encountered roving gangs of young Muslim males tooled up with knives and Machetes hunting anyone white with a short haircut or union flag on their clothing. The elites have created open warfare throughout Europe but the media suppress that knowledge and mislead people into thinking things are working out. The police attack the EDL with truncheons funnelling them into tight wedges as at Hillsborough. In Leeds they continued to attack them while they were falling over each other. Just in case anyone was in any doubt whatsoever about the double standards and discrimination afforded to the white, Christian population of this country two EDL supporters staged a rooftop protest against Dudley mosque being foisted on local people over the Bank Holiday Weekend. They were charged with offences including Burglary, intent to cause Criminal Damage and Incitement of Religious Hatred. They appeared in court one with broken arm sustained during or after arrest, the other a black eye. Witnesses confirmed they made no attempt to resist arrest and the police were extremely 'heavy handed'. Yet when Muslims chased the tough-guy police calling them cowards and poofs they ran away. Those who believe in civil disobedience be careful: In “Scared Yet,” on the “England Expects” blog, Libertarian Party leader Ian Parker-Joseph revealed that the M.O.D. were asking military personnel: “Will you open fire on UK citizens?… In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to ‘open fire’ on UK citizens during civil disturbances.” This is corroborated by Dr. Richard North who revealed that the M.O.D. was buying up “unusually large quantities of tear gas and other riot equipment.” We are part of a wider genocide: In Britain members of the ruling elites have admitted it. Andrew Neather admitted it and Migration Watch had secret government documents released under the freedom of Information Act are bases for another Nuremberg trial! Imposed Multi-Racialism with the admitted intention of the physical destruction of Whites is an organized crime against humanity. The humiliation, dispossession and gradual destruction of Whites, from Canada to Sweden to Africa is : The largest campaign of ethnic cleansing in recorded history. The lessons we derive from the foregoing are firstly, the need to move close together. In a sense we are pioneers in our own country and need to relocate and form new communities of self defence. In view of the tyrannical power over the internet our enemy government are going to take we need to develop lines of communication between our communities. If large roads become impassable use bicycles especially with carriers. Muslim vigilantes drive around an area just outside the territory they are taking over and threatening dissolute types like alcoholics, drunks and prostitutes as they clean up the area for their people to move into. They are also claiming territory by opening mosques which, as well as cultural and community centres, are ideological training grounds for street soldiers. The imposition all over the country of no-go areas is prohibiting Whites from entering their territory. Like us they need areas of their own where they can bring their children up within their own cultural womb so they make life difficult for resident Whites to drive them out and, as the police and council authorities are on their side against local Whites, the Whites move out. This is euphemistically called “White flight.” Alternating governments are aspects of one elite and have been acting illegally under the UN Genocide Act which nullifies any obligation to maintain the multi-racial state. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, thus tacitly accepting our replacement. Around 8 years ago The Birmingham Post quoted a former senior Central TV official as saying we must prepare people for Muslims to become the majority. Jans Orbeck former Swedish PM admitted Muslims would take over. Now this will surprise many but the key to our survival is by co-operating with other endangered groups like the Jewish communities. In January 2009 Muslims marched through European cities chanting “Jews to the gas” but the media played it down thus allowing it to fester. The difficulty at the moment is that Jewish people still think White Christians are their enemy but mass immigration of Muslims has changed everything. The historical difficulties between our two peoples is not so important while Muslims physically attack Jews in France and Malmo, Sweden and Norway and take our countries off us. As an expedient we have to co-operate for our common defence. The elites are made up of both White and Jewish people and both are destroying their people. The Financial Times of 21 November 2003 reported that the EU's racism watchdog shelved a report on anti-Semitism because it found Muslims and pro-Palestinian groups were perpetrating most racist attacks. The report, "was judged inflammatory" and buried. "The decision not to publish was a political decision." The page from the paper is no longer available online! (7) This same EU has developed The European-Mediterranian Partnership to encourage mass Muslim immigration and replace European peoples and culture by mass immigration of Muslims and a policy of Islamification. This partnership of the EU and Arab countries around the Mediterranean surrounds Israel with hostile countries, gives millions to Palestinian organisations as well as encouraging the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and replacing indigenous Europeans as well as replacing our culture by an official programme of Islamification. Don't take my word for it research it for yourselves. Recent figures from the Department of Education reveal that 43.1 percent of primary school pupils and 30.3 percent of secondary school pupils speak English as their second language. These are mainly “eastern European immigrants and a rising birth rate among non-English-speaking Asian families.” They will be exaggerating eastern European immigration to hide the Third World aspect of the invasion. For example, Bradford, which is being colonised by Pakistanis has had over 1,200 new non-English-speaking school children arriving in the last 12 months. There are nearly a million schoolchildren in Britain who do not have English as their first language. This causes English-speaking parents to withdraw their children and move to “English” schools. The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims target people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear West Indians in Bury Park by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to oppose what Muslims are doing! See - Bedfordshire on Sunday 13/01/2008 and Luton on Sunday 16/01/2008 As far back as 1954 Judge William Clothier called on the government to send immigrants back. He was presiding over a trial of a Black immigrant who tried to drive A White tenant out. Whites are the main sufferers in the whole immigration saga. How are we to cope with this? We begin by asking ourselves questions. Will our children get a better education away from immigrant schools? Will they be safer from the knife and gun crime perpetrated by immigrants? What influence could we exert from outside? Is it worth risking getting mugged or stabbed on the tube commuting to city jobs? Businesses are cheaper to run outside cities. As a supplement to political activism we need to be part of and represent our communities. To provide help and advice to those affected by the anti-White policies of the elites, tap into the problems of local people and open advice surgeries. This will take time and money but we represent our community not the Established elites. Rather than trying to take the elites at their own game, fight on our own ground. Help those who get displaced by immigrants, those who the state discriminate against. Don't just tell their stories, represent them. Promote the work on the main website and involve the loyal bloggers in countering the biased media representation, showing what it is to be part of a community-based movement. Concentrate energy on things we can change, for this is going to be a long haul. We are already being ethnically cleansed and must not passively submit and must take control by moving out and rallying ourselves and, like Jewish people do, boycott immigrant shops and use only our own. Get children educated in white schools or Home School so they don't get brainwashed, de-cultured or turned into sexual perverts by State education. They are our children and our responsibility and we should be planning a decent future for them. One day the children will want children and there'll be nowhere safe to go. We have to get involved in every aspect of life - local organisations, folk societies, school governors and home schooling and start our own credit unions. We need to form committees like alternative councils with proper banking and verified officers and proper banking to counter having our communities taken off us. To be practical we must consider the logistics we will need. The arteries of goods and supply are now housed in large warehouses near motorways and hence to outlying areas. This is something for us to do when the race war breaks into organised fighting. There are fields and allotments to buy in the country. It would be a bit like the “Dig for Britain” campaign in the Second War all available land was utilised for growing food. We must stop squandering money on the shallow distractions the media and adverts encourage, like expensive and unnecessary cosmetics. Young White women are naturally beautiful and don’t need to slap this expensive rubbish over their faces nor do you have to squander your resources on clubbing, booze and dope. We are misled by politician, football, TV, and adverts for shallow re-assurances like –have your boobs expanded. They are constantly advertising marked-up cosmetics. Save the money and invest in your communities and future generations. Set out to be economically powerful and through communal credit unions open your own shops. A related problem is the serious financial problems in the EU and our massive debt indicates we might go the way of Greece. This is a major major issue. Economics brings down systems faster than grievances about social policy. For they put up with anything if they have cash and this is how welfare entitlements are used to manage the population. A breakdown in the single currency would unleash powerful political forces. The global market is to the detriment of workers in the advanced nations - global corporations use labour from the cheapest labour markets. Immigrants have been used as cheap labour since immigration started and that is why the NHS and London Transport brought them in. It saved them improving conditions and paying a reasonable wage. We are in the position immigrants were when they first came. They worked hard and pooled resources to start buying houses, first, in run down areas like Upper Parliament Street in Liverpool and Chapletown in Leeds which had been fashionable large houses in the inner cities. The working classes had been moved onto large estates and the middle classes were in the suburbs. The immigrants began penetrating the centres of cities like London which are the most economically and culturally important. They have been putting down roots and encourage their children to study for the professions and get into positions of influence and jobs that yield a pension because they believe in building for the future not escape from life. We have to think communally and build up the strength of our communities as mutual support structures like extended families. The ownership of land gives power to these rival communities. When the authorities bend the rules to allow them to take things off us they are allowing new people to take over. The authorities over ride local communities to give power and influence to immigrants by preferential planning permission. The new Planning Guidelines state that the interests of ‘Travellers’ should take precedence over our( settled) communities. They already have priority for getting their children into popular schools and treatment on the NHS. Now, they are to be enabled to build caravan sites on green belt land, and this dispossesses people remote from immigrant areas. An idea was put forward in The Spectator of 17th December 2005 by Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton: “Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm… If we wish to retain our countryside, it is up to us who live there to make the necessary sacrifices.” This applies to forming collectives to buy property in our towns and cities. There is a positive, wholesome vision in this which offers a proper future for the children. It is one of rebuilding our communities and offering preference in housing and employment to our own people as a matter of priority because they share our ancestory. We must start a fund like The Jewish National Fund to restore British neighbourhoods. We should invite our diaspora: Australians, Canadians to return. As they themselves are victims of Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide White Zimbabweans and South Africans should be asked to return to Britain for their sake as well as ours. The government won’t like it but as they are trying to destroy us we must ignore them. We need to found community defence forces to protect our people based on the Jewish community defence force the CST.

Britain Used to Have Fourth Largest Gold Reserves Until Gordon Brown Came Along

U.K. Used to Have Fourth Largest Gold Reserves Until Gordon Brown Came Along

By Edward Bruce

"I fucked the English and their gold.."

FIFE - Scotland - One of the main reasons the U.K. is so vulnerable today and susceptible to economic misery, is because when Gordon Brown was Chancellor during the Blair years, he sold off all of Britain's gold at the bottom of the market.

The current economic crisis enveloping the world at the moment could have been very different for Britain if Gordon Brown had not sold off Britain's gold for a pittance as prices now are reaching $1700.

"Britain would have had a real bargaining chip if Gordon Brown had not sold off all the reserves for the lowest price. We used to have the fourth largest reserves in the world, now we're barely at twenty. "

Britain's reserves were not 'salted' unlike their American counterparts who do not have a full vault at Fort Knox, the U.K. lost £16 billion when Gordon Brown sold 400 tons of Britain's gold reserves at rock-bottom prices in 1999. If he had kept the gold and it had been sold at today's prices, the U.K. would have been in a different position to what it is now - a moribund wreck.

"With the additional reckless spending spree that Brown went on when he shoe-horned his way into office, the U.K. will be in trouble economically for the next 40 - 50 years. Many generations of taxpayer will have to suffer just because of one man's idiocy and reckless vandalism. Gordon Brown is actually a traitor to Britain. He should be tried for high treason for making our nation into a defenceless piss hole without any chance of getting out of this mess for many years," Thomas Hetheringbone, 87, a decorated WW2 veteran told the Times.

Gordon Brown, who has been on a permanent taxpayer funded holiday since being ousted from office, even tried to apply for the head job at the IMF recently.

“Dem Wacist Poleese Did Come ‘rest Us Cos Dem Always Keepin’ a Brudder Down”

“Dem Wacist Poleese Did Come ‘rest Us Cos Dem Always Keepin’ a Brudder Down”

By Southwest Nationalist.

Well, Tottenham and other parts of London are ablaze, the streets are a war-zone, all because the police shoot dead one man who — by all accounts — appears to be somewhat of a ‘gangsta’ and who had fired a gun at police.

What were the police supposed to do. Ask him politely to desist, withdraw to a safe distance, and immediately apply for some additional sensitivity training so that they could better address the issues which led this young black man to shoot at them?

It seems that way according to the liberal media.

You certainly won’t hear the words “race riot” spoken, but if you take a look at all of the pictures and videos, how many white faces do you see out there looting and attacking police?

And, just read the media reports. It seems that some of the usual ‘news’ outlets want to do their best to present this as a case of justified anger almost, a build up of anger amongst a community which distrusts the police, an almost righteous outpouring of rage at oppression and poor living conditions.

Yet, of course, the police have to play it softly softly. There’ll be photos in all the papers, complete with sympathy for the rioters, and you can guarantee an armful of complaints – complete with publicly funded lawyers – about brutality and heavy handed tactics.

“Yo man me and me bro waz dus robbin’ dat der ‘lectrical shop man err protestin’ man den dem wacist poleese did come ‘rest us cos dem always keepin’ a brudder down”.

The police are in an unenviable situation. You know their political masters are going to say it is their fault, there will be no other outcome because multiculturalism has to prevail. There’s not a problem here, move along folks, all would have been good without those nasty police with guns.

Of course, it’s not a racial issue, it never is unless it is whites to blame. The need for police initiatives such as Operation Trident, to tackle black gun crime, is an inconvenient truth we’ll not refer to.

If you think the same standards apply to all, look at Winston Silcott. Convicted of murdering PC Keith Blakelock during the Broadwater Farm riots of 1987, the conviction was subsequently overturned. Silcott had already served 18 years for another murder. In 2005 he was recruited to run a youth centre — by police — in a bid to reduce youth crime!

You really couldn’t make that up.

Perhaps the Stephen Lawrence accused, already acquitted several times, could be hired to help build bridges between communities and reduce racist crime?

Insane of course, but really it boils down to a very similar line of thinking.

What has been created in Britain is not a harmonious paradise, but rather a series of ghettoes where — at best — an uneasy truce exists between the forces of law and the ‘locals’.

Underneath the surface those tensions are simmering, just waiting for an opportunity to explode. In those communities the “them and us” mentality is very much alive and well, indeed a code to live by.

A compliant media will make sure of a sensitive hearing, a government and establishment obsessed with convincing us all that there isn’t a problem will downplay it all, make future concessions, and ensure that police take a softly softly approach and sometimes turn a blind eye for fear of arousing the wrath of the community.

Should that wrath boil over, we’ll see the excuses machine spin into overdrive, a wealth of concessions handed over, and of course a convenient scapegoat hung out to dry. It’s always the same.

Worse still, our authorities have shown that they are powerless, that riots will achieve some kind of concessions and sympathy, it’s a winning strategy.

A few may get arrested, but it works overall, at least if your face happens to fit in the right IC2-6 category. If you’re IC 1 then forget it.

We have ended with ghettos and war-zones, it was all so predictable, but those running the show thought they knew better. Their judgement was clouded by some insane ideal of politically correct harmony and wishful thinking.

The UK has been made into a tinderbox where the law abiding have much to fear, and the fuse has been lit.

They never told us about this when they were singing the praises of colonisation and telling us how enriched we would all be.

Political Nationalism is Desperately Needed in UK

Political Nationalism is Desperately Needed in Britain

Political Nationalism is Desperately Needed in Britain
By Peter Mills.
The political spearhead of the Nationalist cause in Britain is at present undergoing a period of re-adjustment and streamlining in order to be more fully equipped to face the future needs of our country. [Image]Those who understand what I mean are welcome to have a chuckle at my euphemism; those who don’t understand can take it as read. The important thing for our disgraceful political squatters in parliament to understand is that Nationalism is not going away; it never will go away; it is merely undergoing a tactical regrouping, as Montgomery did in the desert campaign of World War 2. And, in our own time, we shall come out fighting – in the political sense, of course. One of the most important things an emerging new and powerful Nationalist unity could accomplish when it comes out of its corner in the political boxing ring, is to take over the long-vacant job of being an actual functioning opposition party to the single-party government system we now have in Britain, where all three major political parties are so completely indistinguishable from each other in general policy that they are very accurately now branded as merely three sub-components of a politically unopposed single Lib-Lab-Con ruling committee. In fact, there has not really been a significant, feisty, properly independent and genuinely opposing opposition party in British politics for something over 30 years. This political imbalance should be put right at the very earliest opportunity, because until it is corrected and the united ruling clique has been discomfited by the resurgence of a proper opposition party powerful enough to challenge their complacent pro-Europe, anti-British cabal, there will continue to be no such thing as genuine Democracy in Britain. Fortunately, we Nationalists will be well prepared as a real and powerful opposition party when the time comes to mount the podium, for a great many of the policies which form the Sacred Bible of the British single-party system have powerful and perfectly legitimate alternative policies that are part of the general Nationalist manifesto, and which also have tremendous appeal to the downtrodden masses of ordinary British people, and which are indisputably better for the wealth, welfare, security, well-being and world-status of Britain, as the opinion polls and daily news stories continually prove beyond any possibility of argument. A genuine opposition party – a Nationalist opposition party – could accomplish a great deal of improvement in our country without actually being a government. This is, by historical remit, the proper purpose of a coordinated political opposition to the government – to prevent the ruling power from freely having its own way, and accomplishing this by representing those voters whom the government does not represent but who are nevertheless still entitled to be represented in Parliament. To start with, it is very necessary to completely outlaw Soviet-style political indoctrination, which has been dishonestly excreted onto us under the sly brand name of “political correctness”. Britain was at one time the home of Free Speech. It is an utterly abhorrent manifestation of the single-party state that there are now certain words and phrases which, if uttered in public, will result in the arrest of the speaker, as was also the case under Stalin, Hitler, Amin and other infamous dictators. This in itself is just one measure of the catastrophic and immoral depths to which British society has been plunged by a single-party government dishonestly masquerading as “freedom of political choice”. Then there is the important matter of re-introducing capital punishment for certain crimes, especially including terrorism and the murder of children, but not restricted to just these. Without any exception whatsoever, every single argument against capital punishment is facile and entirely invalid. Certainly, in the past, innocent people were hanged. All that is necessary to reduce the likelihood of this happening effectively to zero is to have a law which permits capital punishment in all cases where there is specific scientific evidence to prove guilt. The wailing argument that capital punishment will not reduce the number of murders committed is provable feeble rubbish. Show me one single murderer who has ever re-offended after being hanged! And, of course, our entire court and penal system must be redesigned from the top downwards, with the guiding principle of protecting society from criminals and not, as it is today, protecting criminals from society. And as a matter of the very utmost urgency and national necessity, Britain must resign from the European Union. There is absolutely NO good reason for us to be part of that debacle. It is said that the majority of our trade is now conducted with European countries. This excuse completely evades the answering of the proper question – why has a succession of British governments allowed British manufacturing industries to stagnate and shut down to such an extent that our products are not eagerly sought after throughout the whole world as they once were? Our politicians seem to be telling us that Europe is doing us a great favour by condescending to purchase our meagre products with superior European money! A proper government, a Nationalist government, would strive to rebuild British manufacturing until its products dominated the world markets and did not depend upon being almost exclusively sold to one political clique, the EU. We must evolve again to produce quality goods which are so much in demand that every country scrambles to purchase them; at present, we are making the tremendous business mistake of begging European countries to, please, keep on paying good Euros for our poor products. Put in simple terms, this government policy contributes in a big way towards making Britain a slave state of Europe. We do not need to turn our backs on Europe, only on the present highly unsatisfactory European Union and its shadowy and unelected commissars who seem to get paid at piece-work rates for weighing down their slave states with totally unnecessary and frequently ridiculous superfluous legislation. For a proper Nationalist opposition party, there is the wonderful and encouraging possibility of joining the growing league of independent Nationalist movements in other European countries, such as that of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and the Front National in France, and many others. This would not be just another version of the present European Union; this would be a cooperative mutual support group of fellow Nationalists in completely independent and self-ruled countries. Our border and immigration controls need to be made solid and uncompromising. All persons who are illegally in Britain must be rounded up and sent back to their point of origin; if that happens to be in an area of war, famine or political oppression of their rights, tough luck! We did not invite them here – our foolish governments merely put the benefits bait on the table and acted surprised when foreigners realized they could get free money, free houses, free schooling and free entry. If their own countries are unattractive or dangerous to live in, let the natives sort their own problems out; the trouble lies with their home governments, not with Britain. Why should we be forced, at our own expense, to cater for the discontent of other nations? British citizens should, by law, be given first choice for all job vacancies, for all social housing, for all school places. If there are too many newcomers flooding in to the country to make this possible, the answer is to halt and reverse the flood, not to place the British in second-place at the back of the queues. This is just one area of flawed government that a strong Nationalist opposition party could, constitutionally, pressurize Parliament to begin to redress. There are many more Nationalist policies that will repair, revitalize and restore Britain to what it should be – a country where the British have priority, a country which is governed properly by a British government for the British people alone, not a European Soviet Republic. Nationalism is not going away; it is merely regrouping to better face the realities of modern times. A rebranded and attractive Nationalism must surely soon emerge from the boiling-pot and then take to centre stage in the theatre of future British politics. In every possible aspect of government, the final arrival of a genuine opposition party on the scene will electrify British politics as it has long needed to be electrified, like a lion leaping amid a pack of cackling hyenas. We must have hope for the future. We must live for the future. And we must create the future! That is the sacred trust which British Nationalism has an incorruptible responsibility to fulfill. We have a patriotic duty to never abandon Hope! How do we want to be remembered by our children and our children’s children – “They were so busy fighting each other that they never accomplished anything”, or “From their struggles finally emerged the government which saved Britain”? The choice is ours; the choice is now; the choice is inevitable. If Nationalism falls, Britain falls. Forever.

IS BOLTON BEING SET TO BURN

THE HORWICH NATIONALISTS BLOG IS URGING ALL INDIGENOUS BRITISH MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO STAY AWAY FROM THE TOWN CENTER OF BOLTON TONIGHT 9TH AUG 2011 ,
AS IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THEIR ARE FACEBOOK AND TWITTER MESSAGES THAT THE SAME FATE THAT AS BEFALLEN OUR ONCE GREAT CAPITOL AND OTHER BRITISH CITIES IS BEING PLANNED FOR BOLTON TONIGHT.

IF THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS CONTINUES TO SPREAD WE NEED ONLY HOLD THE LEFT WING PSEUDO INTELLIGENTSIA RESPONSIBLE AND THEIR SATANIC BACKED GLOBALIST FINANCIERS AND THEIR MOUTH PIECES THE TRADE UNIONS AND THE LABOUR PARTY ESPECIALLY OF THE THREE MAIN PARTIES.

WE HAVE SEEN OUR ONCE SECURE AND PEACEFUL LAND TURNED INTO A MULTI CULTURAL AND RACIAL NIGHTMARE, WERE NO SENSE OF NATIONAL OR EVEN LOCAL COHESION OF THE POPULATION EXISTS AT ALL.
THE BBC BLATANT BIAS CORPORATION IS AT THIS MOMENT TRYING THE SAME OLD MARXIST LABOUR SUPPORTING BULLSHIT ( PARDON THE FRENCH) IN TRYING TO GLOSS OVER THE SITUATION.
BUT THE FACT IS THAT OUR NATION CAN ONLY BE HEALED BY THE COMPLETE REVERSAL OF THE DEVASTATING POLICIES OF THE TRAITOROUS BIG THREE PARTIES , WHO HAVE SOLD OUR NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE OUT TO BIG CORPORATIONS FOR PERSONAL OR IDEOLOGICAL MEANS THROUGH BEING SOCIALIST USEFUL IDIOTS.
I RECOMMEND YOU TRY VISITING THE BNP IDEAS SITE
AS A MAN OF OVER 50 YEARS I CAN REMEMBER THE SECURITY OF BELONGING TO A NATION AND PEOPLE WHO DESPITE THE HARDSHIPS OF THE TIME HAD A COMMON THREAD OF NATIONAL AND CULTURAL IDENTITY THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO FACE ANY CHALLENGE AS SHOWN IN BOTH OF THE WORLD WARS, IF SUCH A SCENARIO WERE TO HAPPEN TODAY WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE RESULTS ?

AND ON THE NOTE OF THE WORLD WARS ALL I
CAN ADD IS MY THANKS TO THE LABOUR PARTY ESPECIALLY ,FOR BETRAYING EVERY MAN WOMAN AND CHILD THAT DIED IN THOSE WARS, WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO THAT FUTURE BRITISH GENERATIONS COULD LIVE AND SECURE HOMELAND,AND TO FINISH YOU TRAITORS.

I HOPE YOU BURN IN THE HELL OF YOUR OWN CREATION!

Islamic Anti-Semitism in Modern Britain

Anti-Semitism in Modern Britain

By Southwest Nationalist.

With new figures for the first 6 months of the year now published by Jewish organisation the Community Security Trust (CST) we witness, yet again, a familiar pattern in incidents of anti-Semitism within the UK.

Although figures for anti-Semitic incidents appear to be falling overall, it seems that incidents in Greater Manchester have rocketed by a third, with 121 incidents in the first six months of the year, more than Greater London (98 incidents) which has a far higher Jewish population.

Most recently in Manchester we saw the case of taxi driver Taha Osman, an Iraqi, who received a 12 month community order for ranting outside a school and yelling that “All Jewish children must die”.

Of course, most incidents don’t make the news, but this was one of those few which did.

The CST report for the opening 6 months of this year makes once more for interesting reading.

For incident perpetrators we are informed that “Bearing in mind these limitations, a physical description of the ethnicity of the perpetrator or perpetrators was provided to CST in 96 of the 283 antisemtic incidents reported during the first six months of 2011.

“Of these, 48 perpetrators were described as white; two as East European; six as black; 32 as Asian; none as Far Eastern; and eight as being of Arab appearance”.

That makes 50% of incidents attributable to white people, and the rest made up by minority groups, including 33% by “Asians”. Religion of the perpetrators is not mentioned.

As the CST points out, it uses the IC1-6 system used by police, so it is quite possible that, for example, Eastern Europeans could have been classified as white in some cases.

Either way, assuming the 50% figure is entirely accurate, whites, who make up the majority of the population of the UK, are actually involved in less anti-Semitic incidents when their numerical domination of the population is taken into account.

Asians, making up a far smaller amount of the population of the UK, are shown — at least by the CST statistics — to be involved in far more incidents relative to their numerical presence in the overall population of Britain.

We see a similar pattern for the 2010 figures. There, the CST identifies the ethnicity of the offender in 214 out of 639 incidents. 101 or 47% were white, 63 or 29% were Asian. 21 were also of Arab appearance, making for another 10%.

2009, and again, similar patterns. From 924 incidents, ethnicities were given in 321 of those. 145 were white, 98 Asian, 39 Arab.

In these years the only way the CST manage to show whites committing more than half of anti-Semitic incidents is by merging “white” with “East European”, and even then it only just takes the figure past 50% in all cases.

A limp argument is made by the CST that these figures are a result of Jews living in more diverse neighbourhoods, but surely this is indeed a tacit admission that the Jewish population as a whole is not exactly benefiting from the joys of mass immigration and the ongoing colonisation of the UK.

What we can see for sure is that white British people account proportionally for far fewer anti-Semitic incidents – at least those in which a perpetrator ethnicity is identified – considering how much of the population of the UK as a whole that white people make up.

All of these figures once more highlight the lie that Britain is a multicultural paradise of diverse communities existing in harmony, and the lie that it is British white people who are responsible for the majority of “hate” incidents.

The much touted harmony between communities does not exist, instead we have an ongoing friction, and as a result one community — in this case, the Jews — are seeing a significant proportion of the “hate” incidents against them originating from within “minority” communities.

It’s certainly food for thought, and not an answer any mainstream politician would dare to give if asked “Where is the hate for the Jews in modern Britain coming from?”.

*All figures taken from CST reports on anti-Semitism, 2009, 2010, first 6 months 2011, available here.

Multi-Culturalism Re-visited , by Andrew Brons MEP

Multi-Culturalism Re-visited

By Andrew Brons MEP.

Culture is so often used as a euphemism for race for those who would prefer to believe race to be a social-construct rather than a reality. So, multi-cultural as in multi-cultural society is seen as a euphemism for multi-racial society – one that contains more than its fair share of different races.

However, it is used in a quite different sense by those who accept the multi-racial society as an undisputed norm. Such people distinguish between multi-racial societies that are mono-cultural and those that are multi-cultural.

The former are those in which Brown Britons* and Black Britons* have donned, indeed are expected to have donned, the British cultural overcoat and therefore have become as British as the rest of us. The latter are those in which Black British Citizens and Brown British Citizens are allowed, even persuaded, to keep their ancestral overcoats on, despite the heat wave of reactions that they have to endure as a consequence.

It goes without saying that both the mono-culturalists and the multi-culturalists accept the cultural overcoat hypothesis: that cultures are, at one and the same time, superficial but identity determining. Whilst they can be put on and taken off, they determine who and what we are – a bit off a contradiction, don’t you think!

The reality is, of course, that distinctive cultures are indelible parts of each holder’s make-up. Distinctive cultures are the products of distinctive peoples; distinctive peoples are not the product of distinctive cultures. However, we must not, as the saying goes, let that reality spoil a good story.

For the first few decades of the multi-racial experiment, mono-culturalism was not so much proclaimed as presumed – in the word integration. It did not need to be articulated. I cannot quite remember quite when multi-culturalism came into the ascendant. Perhaps, it was simply an excuse for the manifest failure of integration. Nobody likes a failure, so when failure becomes too obvious, you claim that that is what you were trying to achieve all along.

Now the enthusiasm for multi-culturalism has waned, perhaps because the idea of third generation immigrants setting off bombs in central London in the name of militant Islam was too much for the multi-racialists of both persuasions to stomach.

This has led to the rise of civic nationalists like UKIP appealing to British citizens of all origins to flock to the flag, as though this act were enough to divest them of any remnants of their former cultural garments.

There are some who thrive on their supposed transmogrification into Britons with interesting features and a permo-tan. The predominant presence of the transmogrified among newsreaders and presenters of children’s television programmes makes one wonder how we managed before they came along.

However, there are others who feel deracinated – cut off from their roots. Their quest for a reconciliation with their roots, sometimes takes bizarre and even violent forms.

The London bombers were simply an extreme manifestation of this phenomenon. It need not have been like that.

The word radicalisation has been used – always pejoratively – in connection with the embrace of fundamental and sometimes violent Islamism by second, third or even later generations of Muslim immigrants.

Whilst violence and unthinking dogmatism must always be resisted, a return to one’s ancestral and philosophical roots – the literal meaning of radicalisation – should not.

The encouragement of unassimilable immigrants to travel to our shores to settle is often portrayed as a generous, kind-hearted act. It was not. Capitalism and International Socialism had a coincidence of objectives derived from very different but equally disreputable motives.

Capitalism saw cheap labour from the Third World as a means of damping down wage demands and of competing with cheap imports made by cheap labour.

They saw immigrants as cheaper factors of production. International Socialism saw the creation of rootless second and third generation immigrants as cannon fodder in their class war.

Both saw it as a means of destroying national identities, which impede the activities of both forms of Cosmopolitanism.

It must be our task to radicalise our ethnic minority populations in the very best sense of that word and in so doing prevent them from being radicalised in the worst sense of that word.

We must encourage them to reconnect with their roots and re-identify with their peoples. All will have had an education that would be the envy of their families in their homelands. They must be enthused to serve in their ancestral homelands and help them to develop for the common good.

A return of our immigrant populations to their ancestral roots will be the first step towards our regaining our national integrity.

* The first second and last time that you will hear me use these terms

End of The All White All American Costumed Superhero

Death of The All White All American Costumed Superhero

Written by John of Gwent

August 2011

When Conan Doyle chose to kill off Sherlock Holmes at the hands of his arch enemy Moriarty at Reichenbach Falls, there was uproar. Young men who avidly bought each new issue of "The Strand" magazine to read the latest instalment of the life and times of Conan Doyle's creation went about their city jobs with mourning crepe in their hats. Eventually Sir Arthur relented and at great risk to the health and sanity of John H Watson MD late of the Indian Army, had the great Consulting Detective reappear in Dr Watson's surgery in order to expose the criminal Moran. Holmes would end his days quietly, having rejected a knighthood, accepted The "Legion d'Honneur", and moved to Sussex where he kept bees. But at least Conan Doyle knew the place for a mulatto in crime fiction. Today the sick peddlers of the gospel of diversity and MultiCulturalism are wetting themselves as they rolling with laughter all the way to the bank. Or so they hope. On this page of the Guardian's "literary" supplement Alison Flood reported how at the end of June this year Marvel Comics went where they have never gone before, publishing in "Ultimate Spider Man #160" a story line in which Peter Parker, the teenager raised by All White All American parents in the largely all white area of Queens who once bitten by a radioactive spider became The Amazing Spider Man, the ultimate home-grown All-White, All-American Costumed Super Hero, meets his end. Not a dry eye in the death scene and not a dry eye in the animation studio either. But Spider Man as we know him had to go. Unlike another Costumed Super Hero we might mention, who despite his square jaw white face and serious muscles was actually an immigrant from another world - which may explain his persistent desire to wear his underpants outside his trousers - The Amazing Spider Man was the real home grown deal. So Spider Man meets his end at the hands of his arch nemesis the Green Goblin (although I bet BNP Wales will be blaming his end on another green superhero by this time next week). Search Google hard enough and you will find all sorts of stories starting with "it brings the story full circle since Peter only became Spider Man to avenge the death of his uncle" and Marvel themselves saying it marks and end to a story arc and they were not sure which way to go. Well if that's right they didn't take long to make their mind up. Marvel senior editor Mark Paniccia said of the death scene "Peter's death doesn't signal the end of their larger plan - it's the start of one of the most ambitious stories you've ever read in comics". Thay aren't kidding. For here comes a rewrite of history that Orwell would have wept at. Here comes the "We have always been at war with Eurasia" moment. The truth is Marvel Comics didn't even give Parker's body the time to go cold in the grave. "Miles Morales" is a half black, half hispanic teenager, who lives with his black and latino parents in "diverse" Brooklyn a world away from the all white Queens where Parker was raised. Marvel editor-in-chief Axel Alonso said the new web-slinger "speaks to our rich cultural heritage" in the US. "Going into this we knew we wanted to make a statement about the 21st century," he said. Alonso is himself of mixed race, having an English mother and a Mexican father. He says "he cried when Barack Obama was elected president partly because he was African-American but largely because of the fact that he was mixed race". He felt it necessary to add that the chief writer for the comic's Spiderman story line, Brian Michael Bendis, is Jewish and has two adopted children from Africa. What Next, I ask? Maybe Captain America Transgendered, mincing across Times Square in pink leotard and five inch heels ? If he/she/it does, you heard if first here people. For those who feel this is a diversification too far, Peter Parker lives on in "The Amazing Spider Man" comic as he has since 1962. Let us hope that for the "Ultimate Spider Man" magazine, this outrageous mulatto takeover of the All American Costumed Superhero marks the ultimate (as in its true sense, i.e LAST EVER) issue of the publication.