The Bible and Political Correctness

The Bible and Political Correctness

Christians are in the middle of a war, a war that has opened up on a new front for us today. We have long recognized Satan as our arch enemy, and accept the warning that he is a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour. Today he has a new tactic, based upon the old principle of peer pressure and our need to be like those around us. Some term the war we are in "Cultural War."

Cultural wars? What are they? Cultural war is a conflict between the former, traditional American value system based upon the Judaeo-Christian ethic and the humanistic "man is the center of all things" ethic. It is the conflict between an objective standard of truth and a subjective standard of truth. This cultural war is the seed bed of Politically Correct thinking.

NO UNIVERSAL TRUTH
The Cultural Wars began with the philosophical perception that true enlightenment may be achieved through human reason. However, as soon as one philosopher presented a method to arrive at enlightenment, another came and discredited it. Soon, philosophers decided that there was no "objective" truth, so everything became subjective. What was true for one person may not be true for another. Their conclusion is that there is no universal truth. They contend that there is no objective standard of rightand wrong. The wisdom of men of our day declares that each man is his own standard and none should stand in judgment on that standard. This is in marked contrast to the teaching of God. Consider a few passages.

Jeremiah 4:22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.

1 Corinthians 1:20-28 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; 24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. 25 Because the foolishness of Godis wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: 27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are.

1 Corinthians 3:18-21 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. 19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written,He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. 20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. 21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are yours.

EXAMPLES OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IN ACTION
A proclamation banning "inappropriately directed laughter" and "conspicuous exclusion of students from conversations," was issued at the University of Connecticut.
A controversy erupted at Harvard Law School when Ian MacNeil, a visiting professor, quoted Lord Byron: "And whispering, 'I will ne'er consent' -consented." The Harvard Women's Law Association was offended and denounced it as a "sexist insult."
Professor Stephan Thernstrom, a distinguished professor of history at Harvard, was forced to drop an undergraduate course after he was harassed because he used the term "Indian" instead of "Native American."
During the Persian Gulf War, officials at the University of Maryland asked students not to hang American flags and pro-war banners from their dorm windows. "This is a very diverse community, and what may be innocent to one person may be insulting to another," according to Jan Davidson, a University of Maryland Official.
Many perceive the Confederate Battle Flag as an offensive symbol of repression of blacks, so it is being forbidden to be flown in may states.
The "Tomahawk Chop" is an insensitive gesture that is demeaning to "Native Americans."
Using names like Indians, Braves, and Warriors, for athletic teams is insensitive.
The National Council of Churches has recommended that the 500th anniversary of Columbus discovery of America be a time of "repentance" for starting "centuries of genocide."
Freshmen cannot be called freshmen, because that has "gender specific" connotations. Must be called "new students."
The nickname "Ragin' Cajuns" was attacked because it was claimed that "Ragin" spelled backwards was a racial slur.
When the NCAA endeavored to set minimum academic standards for athletes, they were charged with a "covert racist agenda." John Thompson, Georgetown basketball coach walked off court during a game to protest the "racist" policy.

DEFINITIONS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
Peter Jones, in his book, THE GNOSTIC EMPIRE STRIKES BACK, (P.#3). states, "America is still number one, but unfortunately she is number one in homosexuality, feminism, divorce, the destruction of family values, abortion, political correctness, and the occult humanistic spirituality of New Age religion."

In , THE CULTURAL CHURCH, p.#77 LaGard Smith, says, "'Political correctness' is nothing more than a benign catch phrase for 'the liberal agenda.' In other words, you and I have to toe the liberal line on issues like abortion, gay rights, and radical feminism, or else be reported to the sensitivity police for being intolerant."

Tom Olbricht of Peperdine University, in a personal response to my request for a definition of "political correctness" wrote, "It means to be proactive withthe current cutting edge consensus (whatever or whoever that is, perhaps best represented by the left wing media trend setters) in conception and vocabulary in respect to ethnicity, cultural diversity, and gender."

William J. Bennet, chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal agency under President Reagan, in his book, THE DEVALUING OF AMERICA, declared, "Politically Correct" thinking is the term given to thepolitical orthodoxy that is pervasive on many college campuses. It insists that students be "politically correct" -meaning left wing- in speech and opinion,particularly on issues having to do with homosexuality, feminism, race, "Eurocentrism," "colonialism," and the like. In reality, it is an academic thought police, the new McCarthyism of the left."

ENTERING THE PC ZONE
Just as Rod Serling warned you about entering the Twilight Zone, when you encounter any of the concepts or terms listed below, be aware that you are entering the PC Zone and that reality will not be what it has always been.It will be subtlety distorted so that right is defined as wrong, and wrong is defined as right. Bear in mind God's warning against such people in Isaiah and Malachi.

Isaiah 5:20-2120 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, andprudent in their own sight!

Malachi 2:17 17 Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in thesight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment? (KJV).

Some of the politically correct terms and buzz words are:

Truth is subjective.
There is no ultimate truth, hence what is truth for one person may not be truth for another.
Morality is subjective.
There is no absolute standard of morality, therefore, no one should ever condemn any act or practice of another.
Consciousness raising.
People who hold strong opinions or positions on a topic or issue only do so because they are self-centered and do not understand those they disagree with. Consciousness raising seminars are conducted by corporations, government agencies, and private organizations in order to remove these "narrow mind sets."
Sensitivity
Judges sentence men charged with being "sexist" to "sensitivity training" which may well be part of a "consciousness raising" program.
Victim
Everyone is a victim. That is the justification for why Johnny can't read - he is a victim of a broken home. It is the justification for why criminals are excused with little or no penalty for their crimes - they are victims of society and should be held in sympathy.
Multiculturalism
This concept has ended the "melting pot" phenomena that made America great. It has encouraged "separatism" of nationality, race, and language. Where once immigrants stove to learn English and fit in, now they are told toretain their own language, culture, and traditions and flaunt those of America.
De-constructionism
De-constructionism is the re-writing of history. We must deny the Holocaust ever occurred because it might hurt the feelings of modern Germans.
Homophobe
Roughly interpreted, homophobe means "fear of homosexuals." Any one opposed to homosexual behavior must be so opposed because of deep seated doubts of their own sexuality. Interestingly enough, no homosexual can ever be a "heteraphobe."
Sexist
It is a unique phenomena that no woman, even those who are ardent advocates of 'Women's Liberation" can be considered a "sexist." Only males are capable of this deviant behavior.
Racist
Again, only the male, and specifically a white male, will ever be charged with being a racist. No black can ever be a racist even if, like Farrakhan, he advocates black supremacy and separatism!
Pro-choice
This term is used by those who have made a woman's choice for her. She must not be given any alternative solution to an unwanted pregnancy but termination of the pregnancy. Her only choice is to have an abortion.

PROMOTERS OF POLITICALLY CORRECT THOUGHT
Political Correctness has had such wide-spread and rapid acceptance because of those who promote it. They are the liberal minded who are in positions of influence and power. They are primarily in academia, the news media,Hollywood, and political offices. As such, their voices have access to tools and techniques to promote their agenda. In spite of the massive re-education efforts made by those advocating political correctness, Americans are beginning to see the fallacy of the concepts. William Bennet, in THE DEVALUING OF AMERICA, page 174, said "Left-wing academics have so publicly offended common sense that the American people now reactto them not only with outrage, but also with ridicule."

Here are some of the problems political correctness is have in convincing thinking people of its validity.

Standardized educational testing has been challenged as being "culturally biased" toward the white middle class so that black students do not have a fair chance. There is a significant problem with that analysis. Non-white,Asian students do better than white middle class Americans.

Political correctness challenges anyone who says "I am right." or who takes a position that is in any way critical of others as being the only sin. Politically correct thinking is tolerant of every one and every thing, with the exception of the traditional standards and practices that made this country great.

Microsoft has been reported to have developed a "political correctness" grammar checker that will enable you to purge all incorrect language from a document. Again, there are some dilemmas they face. In India, the multiculturists have a huge dilemma. Someone from one culture cannot judge someone from another culture. Black, Native American, Oriental, all cultural perspectives are valid and true for that culture. The pro-abortionists applaud the right women have for abortion. The use of high tech methods to determine the sex of the child in the womb has led to massive abortion of "girl" fetuses because of the "cultural" bias for male children. The feminists deplore this situation. Their culture is OK. Abortion is OK. A cultural bias for the abortion of girl babies is... They have a dilemma!

SOUR FRUIT OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
"For supposedly noble reasons - including the wish to instill ethnic and racial pride - universities are drawing more and more attention to race. Increasingly we've gone from putting a premium on being color-blind to putting a premium on being color conscious." William Bennet, The De-Valuing of America, p 184

Blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities, under the guise of cultural heritage and racial pride are being encouraged to seek "separate but equal" facilities in all walks of life. Literature is now judged on the race andgender of its author rather than the quality of writing. History is being re written with and Afro-centrism bias, that everything good originates out of Africa and is"black." Abraham, Isaac, and Jesus were black. The reason Joseph and Mary were turned away from the inn was that they were black. Eli Whitney was black Beethoven was black Robert Browning was black. This is not ajoke, but what many are advocating.

History is being placed under the rule of subjectivism, so that some are now are advocating that the "Holocaust" never occurred, and want to re-write the history books to reflect this opinion.

Everyone is either the descendant of a victim or the descendant of an oppressor. As such, the descendants of victims are due some recompense, and the descendants of the oppressors are to be held liable.

Political Correctness has become a bastion for ignorance and misinformation.

DEALING WITH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS....
It is important for those who would serve God to respect who and what is deserving of respect for the reason they are due the respect. Romans 13:7 tells us: "7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tributeis due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Compare the different responses of Bork and Clarence Thomas to the challenges made to them as to their worthiness to sit on the Supreme Court. The outcomes were extremely different. Clarence Thomas challenged thepolitically correct challenges openly and publicly. He won! There may be a lesson there for how to deal with politically correct challenges.

Expose the arguments to public examination. Do not flee. In fact, do just the opposite. James writes, in James 4:7, "Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." One of the best ways toresist sin is to correctly label it. Issues such as Pro-choice are in reality, Pro-Abortion. Focus the thought on the real issue, not the straw-man erected by the politically correct faction.

Apply the Biblical response to issues such as political correctness.

Don't follow the crowd - Political correctness is frequently an attempt to justify sin.

Exodus 23:2 Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment:

Recognize the subterfuge of Satan.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Don't accept the philosophy because it flatly contradicts God's word.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD.

Proverbs 24:24 He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him: 25 But to them that rebuke him shall be delight, and a good blessing shall come upon them.

Malachi 2:17 Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?

God's description of the Gentile condition is like a prophetic picture of the end result of the "politically correct" road.

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things ofhim from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without naturalaffection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

THE BIBLICAL APPLICATION FOR CHRISTIANS...
Neither favor nor slight anyone because of race, color, national origin, religion, or gender.

Proverbs 22:2 The rich and poor meet together: the LORD is the maker of them all.

James 2:1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. 2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; 3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: 4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts? 5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? 6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? 7 Do not theyblaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called? 8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: 9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.

Acts 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath showed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

DON'T EVER FORGET THAT THERE IS AN OBJECTIVE STANDARD OF TRUTH. THAT STANDARD IS THE BIBLE, GOD'S WORD.
 

By Ney Rieber

Gay Good - Patriotism Bad at Blackpool

Gay Good - Patriotism Bad

Created: Tuesday, 18 May 2010 12:11 Author: Green Arrow |  

If you find the above offensive then sod off and die

You know, I look back at the overthrow of the Romanian tyrant Nicolae Ceausecu and pray that I live to see similar events talking place in our ripped apart land that is also under the jackboot for an authoritarian regime.  

But I do wonder how much longer will the British People permit The Establishment to keep stamping on their faces?  If they think that our oppressors will stop or get bored of torturing us they are mistaken, for this how our enemies think.

Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face— forever.

And again the Jackboot of The Establishment has stamped on the face of the English people living in Blackpool when they have announced a ban on Taxi drivers  showing their patriotic support for England in their cabs.

The Taxi drivers in Blackpool have been told they will have their licences to operate revoked if they display anything featuring the word England, the Cross of St George and the Three Lions shield on the grounds that their display might offend visitors from overseas, Wales or Scotland. 

Now I understand how it is a common, indeed a compulsory trait for the enrichers to be offended but who seriously thinks that a Football supporting Welshman or Scotsman is going to be offended at seeing an English Flag? Personally I will be cheering on England although I loath football and am Welsh to boot.   No, this threat to the drivers is just another attempt by The Establishment to destroy the identity of the English People.

Labour-controlled Blackpool council said last night: "The consensus among our officers is that a shirt featuring the Three Lions or the Cross of St George constitutes a football shirt, and these are not permitted".

If there is any real offence to be taken in Blackpool, it should be directed at the Blackpool Town Hall which is currently flying the rainbow  flag to support this weekend's Gay Pride event.  The flag is rarely taken down it seems.  Gays do like a good party but in these days Gay is Good and Patriotism is Bad.
Roll on the Revolution and the final victory of the British National Party.

Tory Foreign Policy “Identical” to Labour’s, Hague Confirms

Tory Foreign Policy “Identical” to Labour’s, Hague Confirms

  |  BNP News

In yet another example of the Tweedledee and Tweedledum nature of Tory/Labour policies, the Conservative Foreign Secretary William Hague has confirmed that his party’s foreign policy is identical to that of the last Labour regime.

Speaking to reporters in Washington DC after meeting Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Mr Hague said that the new British government's policy on Iran “would not differ much from that of the previous government.”

He also confirmed that the Conservative Party would be prepared to take Britain into yet another Middle Eastern war against Iran.

Asked if military action might be required to halt Iran's alleged “nuclear weapons programme,” Mr Hague said it was the “prospect” of such a war which was the driver for the current punitive steps against the Iranians.

When he was specifically asked whether the US and UK would be compelled to discuss military action against Iran, Mr Hague said, "We've never ruled out supporting, in the future, military action, but we're not calling for it. It is precisely because we want to see this matter settled peacefully and rapidly that we call for the sanctions, that we support the idea of a Security Council resolution."

This was the identical strategy used to “justify” the war against Iraq. First it was claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).

Iraq denied having WMDs and when that nation could not show any “evidence” to prove its case, it was invaded. The fact that the WMDs never existed was then brushed under the carpet.

Iran is also now being put in the invidious position of having to “prove” that it does not have a nuclear weapons project.

Like Iraq, Iran is now being called upon to provide “proof” that it has stopped doing something which does not exist.

Mr Hague, Ms Clinton and the other neo-con warmongers have consistently ignored all evidence indicating that Iran has no nuclear weapons projects, including a statement specifically denying the existence of such a project from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Yukiya Amano.

Mr Amano told Reuters in July 2009 that he had studied all the paperwork on the Iran issue and that he did not see any hard evidence Iran was trying to gain the ability to develop nuclear arms.

“I don't see any evidence in IAEA official documents about this,” Mr Amano, a respected Japanese diplomat said.

Like Iraq, the neo-cons are also “manufacturing” evidence against Iran. In February 2007, diplomats at the IAEA complained that most U.S. intelligence shared with the IAEA had proved inaccurate.

Demonstrate in Support of Freedom of Expression on May 24, 25 and 26

Demonstrate in Support of Freedom of Expression on May 24, 25 and 26

  BNP News

The civil rights organisation Civil Liberty has called on all patriots to support a public demonstration in support of freedom of expression and persecuted former teacher Adam Walker in Birmingham city centre on 24, 25 and 26 May.

The dates coincide with Mr Walker’s new appearance in front of the General Teaching Council (GTC) which has sought to persecute him since November 2008 in a protracted struggle over the right of teachers to hold private political views.

According to Mr Walker’s legal representatives, the GTC has claimed that Mr Walker posted views "suggestive of racial and religious intolerance" using a pseudonym on the Internet while using a computer at the school where he was employed at the time.

“The first hearings ended in a fiasco when Mr Walker’s Solidarity trade union’s legal argument centred on the presence on the panel of Judy Moorhouse, an open and self-acknowledged vocal critic of the British National Party, to which Mr Walker belongs.

The clamour against Ms Moorhouse’s obvious unsuitability to sit on the panel grew overwhelming and the entire panel, tainted by her bias, resigned.

A new panel was appointed and heard legal arguments centred around human rights, data protection and privacy issues. The case has been postponed twice, once due to heightened tensions following EDL/UAF-Muslim clashes.

Mr Walker expressed his views under a pseudonym ('Corporal Fox') on a local internet forum. At no point did he draw attention to his role as a teacher or name his workplace.

It has been accepted that while those who ran the forum could trace the ISP address to a Sunderland council server, it could only be traced further by an internal investigation.

At no point was Mr Walker’s personal information regarding either his name or place of employment available to the public through the forum. There is thus no basis for saying that his actions brought the profession into disrepute.

Mr Walker’s comments included statements critical of asylum seekers who committed crimes whilst enjoying the protection and hospitality of our country.

Since these posts were made under a pseudonym and no personal email was made available to the public, there was no way to tie the statements to Mr Walker. As a result there was no way the public could ever have connected the comments with his role as a teacher or his workplace.

In fact, Mr Walker’s identity only came to light after the person running the local forum, Paul Jameson, linked to his postings — contrary to the site’s own stated policy and in breach of data protection and privacy principles.

“Mr Walker has admitted he was wrong to use his laptop to contribute to the forum during work time,” said Solidarity general secretary Patrick Harrington.

“That was a contractual matter between him and his employer and when he resigned, that should have been the end of the matter.

"We feel this raises human rights issues. He has a right, like every other citizen, to freedom of expression and association. The framing of the charge introduces politics into the picture, which opens the door for someone with aspirations to score party political points,” Mr Harrington said.

“The GTC has still not given a good enough reason as to why they want to overrule rights to freedom of expression for teachers with political and religious views.

“There is no link between Mr Walker's views and his professional role. There is no suggestion that he has treated anyone from a different religious background with anything other than respect,” he continued.

“Indeed, one pupil from such a background was moved to write to a local paper defending her former teacher and giving personal testimony as to how he had helped her.

"Misguided extremists have called for Mr Walker to be banned from teaching. They have been busy constructing a gallows on which to hang him.

“Our union says ‘no’ to these attacks on freedom of expression. To suggest that Mr Walker should face a lifetime ban from the profession of teaching merely for anonymously expressing his political views is completely unacceptable,” Mr Harrington said.

Mr Walker will appear before the GTC once again on 24 to 26 May in Birmingham city centre, and Civil Liberty has called for a demonstration on the theme 'Make a Noise for Freedom' outside the hearing on those days. The demonstration will start each day at 9am.

“All those who love freedom should attend. If we don't stand up against this PC nonsense now, where will it end? Today it is Adam Walker who they are trying to hang; tomorrow it could be you,” Mr Harrington concluded.

Did You Vote For This?

Did You Vote For This?

  Author: BC1959 |  

Is this what you voted for?

Whilst we all come to terms with recent events, and whilst we are in the midst of the war on White Western society, and in particular, our own nation, it seems absolutely right that this Author plucks from a vast library of pictures, one that tells it's own story. A picture certainly paints a thousand words, and this one is a picture of our future writ LARGE. This poor fellow was once an engineer, known in the area as a laugh a minute type of chap. He had a family, a well paid, very demanding job, and owned his own home. His position in the Lib/Lab/Con's new BIG SOCIETY is... well, prostate, damaged, and considered unimportant to our treacherous leaders. He lies in a stupor, completely drunk, and with no prospects other than more of the same, until his liver, heart, and mental state can no longer take the strain. He is in fact, just one of over Seventeen Thousand Britons (known figures) who have simply given up hope. Sadly also, he is a burden now on our debt ridden, wrecked society. Where as once he was the typical shining light that made this country what it once was, he is now so demoralised, his only pleasure and escape, is seeing each can emptied.... all with the help of The Establishment.

Claimants suffering from 'psychosis', which is a form of mental illness often caused by both smoking cannabis, and poisoning the mind and body with super-strong ciders and beers, has increased from Sixty Three Thousand in Nineteen Ninety Seven (Labour) to One Hundred and Forty Eight Thousand up until last year (2009). All researchers require is a trawl through The Freedom of Information Act to see that the number of drug and alcohol addicts claiming the £60-a-week payment, has risen five-fold, from Three Thousand in Nineteen Ninety Seven, to Seventeen Thousand up until last year. This Author did not vote for this socio-cultural disaster, and most ordinary people did not either. The debt, misery, and post manufacturing economic/democratic society imposed upon us in a decade and a half, has now caused a large number of former decent, hard working people, to help us drown ourselves further into the murky black hole.

So much so that, (DLA), or Disability Living Allowance has soared from £5.7billion, to £8.8billion every single year. Every year for the next Twenty Years, a large, fully staffed Super Hospital could be built with that sum, now oozing out from our economy in what can only be described as a Deliberate and Socio-Culturally Engineered plan, to destabilise and dumb down our current, and future generations as we enter Dave and Nick's BRAVE NEW WORLD. And what a world we have reaching out before us. Economic depression, bankers now so brazen, they have literally taken over parliament, and an elite set of mainly foreign, or foreign origin Communists disguised as British Politicians to take us on a merry trip to hell. And a one way trip at that.

By December 2009, government debt (according to them) was £950.4 billion, equivalent to 68.1 per cent of GDP. This figure will never be brought down, as any sane and intelligent reader will immediately see the disparate links between the poor fellow in the picture, and the European Regulations that have caused his, and many other British peoples demise.

  How have they done this, and why? The Maastricht Treaty's Excessive Deficit Procedure sets deficit and debt targets of 3 per cent and 60 per cent respectively for all EU countries. The UK's compliance is assessed on a financial year basis. Debt measure used under the Maastricht Treaty does not take account of assets held by general government. Nor does it take into account, our stolen Gold Reserves, sold at the lowest level by Comrade Brown. We manufacture almost nothing compared to the pre-war, and immediate post-war era. As we have not legally under English and British law, entered any agreements as free people and tax payers, to become a full member of the European Union, then the following information, will say it all.

Britain's £9.1bn overseas aid budget would be cut by the Conservatives... but only to the more prosperous developing nations, like China, and only to boost aid to the poorest in the Commonwealth. Our ''Common Wealth'' has been stolen, as has the chap lying in the gateway to his local recreation ground. Did you vote to see him, and others thrown out of work, in complete despair, no home, no prospects, and probable early death through giving up all hope? This Author did not, and you the reader presumably did not either... so who the bloody hell did then? Did you, the reader, activist, patriot and future slave of an internationalist bankers dictatorship realise that, 102 countries are now the beneficiary of that trifling £9.1 Billion? 

Are you one of those occasional readers, MP's and UAF supporters, who pop in to see us ''rant about immigration'', ''the EU'', and smirk about our supposed ''Race Hate'' agenda? If so, this Author would be glad to introduce you to the fella lying slumped, bruised and hopeless in the accompanying picture, and you can tell him how you feel. If you supported the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, New Labour, or decided that you were against the British National Party and voted for the many stooges and independents, then one question is left to you... all answers please, on a ''Post Democracy card'' to the question... DID YOU VOTE FOR THIS? 
Money measures vie for votes this fall.(Government)(With so many to consider, voters usually are inclined to say no, but at least one pollster is optimistic): ... from: The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR) 

The threat to the Western male

The threat to the Western male

  Author: Sarah: Maid of Albion |  

I make no pretense other than that this article is purely speculative, I have no current scientific evidence to support the hypothesis which I shall put before you. However, that is inevitably the way in our current world, if one seeks to examine theories which travel beyond the strictly enforced boundaries of permitted orthodoxy and to question the inflexible dogmas governing currently acceptable truths.

Outside the realms of what is permitted there is no science, there is no research, established doctrines can not be questioned, and no funds are available to support anyone who dares to do so.

Therefore, when asking questions such as those I am about to ask, the only option is to speculate, for in doing so, one has entered a domain where science dare not go. This is hardly surprising, the penalty for transgression can be severe. Cruel examples have been made of those scientists and writers who tried to enter no-man's land, the savaging of Herrnstein and Murray in the 1990's and the more recent reputation destroying demonisation heaped on Nobel Prize winning Dr James Watson for daring to speak against the doctrines of our age, will have warned others of the fate awaiting those who fail to obey.

Therefore, I make no apology for being unable to support my speculation with current science, for we live in an age where were a scientist to provide such support, or even Investigate the possibility, he would, of course, never be permitted to work again.

The topic I wish to discuss, but can not support with scientific data is what may actually be the cause of the falling fertility rates amongst some sections of Western Society. Over recent years none of us can have missed the articles which keep appearing in newspapers and magazines reporting the drop in fertility rates amongst Western Males. A recent report indicated that many as one in five healthy young men between the ages of 18 and 25 produce abnormally low sperm counts.

This report was greeted by the somewhat feigned hysteria by the Daily Mail with the warning that men, as a group, could become infertile within a few generations. Clearly if this were true it would lead to the death of the human race, given that scientists have not yet mastered the manufacture of human sperm from radishes, bananas or ocean plankton, which would enable the continued survival of the Sapphic Utopia which some man haters dream might follow.

However, given exploding birth rates worldwide, it would appear that this phenomenon is only effecting Western males, there is certainly no evidence of falling fertility rates in the third world, in fact, very much the reverse would seem to apply. So, if we are to believe what we are being told, it is among white European males that sperm counts are dropping and fertility problems are increasing, however, is that really what is happening?

The newspaper reports focus on the male, because it is fashionable to belittle men, especially white men, but in fact the report states that the problem with male fertility “starts within the womb”, so, in fact, whatever is going on actually effects both sexes. Something is happening within the pregnant female body which is impacting on the fertility of the male child. What can that be?

Naturally scientists, researching within the parameters in which it is permissible for them to research, are seeking to identify environmental factors.

Of course many were quick to blame science's favourite villain, tobacco. Mothers who smoke, they claimed, were having an effect on the fertility of their unborn male child. However, this claim does not make sense, male infertility is increasing, whist smoking has been on the decline for decades. Smoking mothers did not hinder the baby boomers who were born to a generation who had smoked their way through the war and the (truly) “never had it so good” 1950's. A child born in 1955 was considerably more likely to have a mother who smoked, and smoked through pregnancy, than would be the case with a child born in 1985, yet it is amongst the children born in the late 1980's and 1990's, after smoking mothers became pariahs, that male sperm counts are falling.

In addition, in the same period smoking rates began to grow in the third world, especially in places like China and India where instead of causing fertility problems, the governments have employed progressively more desperate measures to control birth rates. Would the Chinese, amongst the most enthusiastic smokers on the planet, have had to introduce a one child per family rule, if there was a problem with Chinese infertility.

Other scientists have pointed to pollution as a possible cause, however, once again, why is it that the problem if disproportionately impacting on the West when parts of the Far East, for instance, experience far higher levels of “modern day” pollution than most of the West, and have done so for decades, without any evident fall in fertility rates.

Of course there are many other factors which could be at the root of the problem, but in an increasingly globalised world, it would be difficult to identify many environmental factor which exclusively effects a distinct section of Western society. It certainly isn't effecting all Western communities, as the booming growth in the Muslim community demonstrates.

There are, however, behavioural factors, and one behavioural factor in particular which has, in recent decades, impacted on White western society to a significantly greater degree than it has impacted on any other racial group on the planet. That factor is the instance of inter-racial sex and the production of mixed race children.

In no other part of the world have distinct racial groups mixed sexually to anything like the degree they have in the West, at least the White section of the west (Muslim families on the other hand have been known to murder daughters who so much as look at a member of a different race – whereas white girls are all but accused of racism if they do not jump into bed with the first black youth to call them “bitch”).

It is not just the girls, in Europe it is quite common to see a white man with an Asian woman, however, in Asia this is a very rare phenomenon, whilst liaisons between Asians and Africans are all but non-existent . In the Middle East, marrying members of other racial groups is very much a taboo, whereas in Africa, with the exception of the Cape Coloured group of mixed Asians, Africans and whites, interracial sex is almost unheard of, at least on a consensual basis.

It is the racist White Westerners alone who have willingly, and in increasing numbers, mixed their blood with other races, the same is not true in the homelands of those we have been mating with. It is now we, the white westerners who are experiencing fertility problems, whilst birth rates are soaring elsewhere in the world. Is there a connection?.

Scientist working in the Victorian age would have said there was a connection. Towards the end of the 19th Century and well into the early 20th Century it was a commonly held scientific belief, based largely on studies of interaction between whites and freed black slaves in North America, that interbreeding between races led to sterility by the third or fourth generation. Such beliefs have long since been decried as “racist” and few if any are the scientists who would dare voice such an opinion, but does that necessarily mean they were untrue?

There is much which is condemned as racism, not all of it is untrue.

I am, of course, speaking the unspeakable here, but that won't be the first time. The very suggestion that interracial sex could have serious and long term genetic problems is so unacceptable to the zealots of the modern orthodoxy, that no researcher would be permitted to investigate the possibility, and any who merely suggested it would be driven out of the profession.

But what if it is true?

It has long been claimed that race is nothing more than a social construct, however, recent findings suggest that may not be entirely the case. It has recently been discovered that all Europeans and most North Asians have around 4% Neanderthal in their DVA, however, black Africans have no Neanderthal DNA whatsoever. This in itself is evidence of a genetic difference, what else will science discover in future years?

The fact that one in five Western males are experiencing fertility problems would sadly fit with the number who are likely to have have some form of recently introduced mixed race ancestry, however distant, so the suggestion is not so very far fetched.

As I said, this is merely speculation based in an area where modern science fears to tread. As such I have no evidence to support my hypothesis, however, I submit to you that the theory fits the facts and is less easy to dismiss than some more popular explanations.

If it is correct, however, then science may be, for reasons of political correctness, deliberately ignoring a situation, resulting from deliberate government policy, which could not only have a devastating impact on our racial group but could mark the end of Western Society.

Taxpayers Forced to Give £18 Million to Communist Controlled Unite Trade Union

Taxpayers Forced to Give £18 Million to Communist Controlled Unite Trade Union,  BNP News

British taxpayers have been forced to hand over £18 million in subsidies to the Unite trade union whose leader spent the beginning of May in Cuba celebrating the 51st anniversary of the Fidel Castro communist revolution.

Unite, and the two unions that formed it (Amicus and the Transport & General Workers Union), received the tax money under two little-known funds “to improve management and training for its members.”

It has been the biggest beneficiary of one of the schemes, the Union Modernisation Fund, and received a sixth of all the money given out under the Union Learning Fund.

The money merry-go-round is made even more outrageous by the fact that Unite has donated over £30 million to the Labour Party over the past decade. In effect then, the taxpayer has paid for the Labour party to function.

Joint-General Secretary of Unite, Tony Woodley, who is paid £122,000 per year for his job, spoke last week at a rally in Havana, Cuba, held to mark the 51st anniversary of the communist military coup which installed Fidel Castro as dictator of that island country.

Cuba is effectively a one-party state. The Cuban Communist Party controls who can run for elections.

The lack of democracy in Cuba appears to be no problem for Unite and Mr Woodley, who is a Labour Party activist and supporter who famously tore up a copy of the Sun newspaper on the podium at his party’s 2009 annual conference.

On 2 May, Mr Woodley addressed a cheering crowd of “Cuban solidarity activists” in the Convention Palace in Havana.

Mr Woodley is also the man behind the current wave of strikes affecting British Airways.

According to reports, Mr Woodley’s “holiday” in Cuba was one of the reasons why talks between BA and the union were delayed.

Last year, Mr Woodley saw his pay and benefits package increase by 20 percent, while public service sector workers — who make up most of Unite’s members — were forced to endure pay freezes or redundancies.

Mr Woodley also received a £6,603 benefit from a union loan towards a maisonette he and Unite are buying in south London and £5,343 in car fuel benefit.

Derek Simpson, 64, Unite's other joint general secretary, received a salary of £97,027 in 2009, up 4 percent on the previous year, a housing benefit of £38,340 and £24,480 towards his chauffeur-driven car.

Bob Crow, leader of the RMT rail union, saw his pay and benefits rise by 8 percent to £91,646, while Billy Hayes, leader of the Communication Workers Union, received a pay rise which took his package to £88,438.

* Workers who are looking for an honest trade union would do well to investigate the Solidarity union which can be found by clicking here.

Cold War Era Dangers On The Home Front (NTSC) 

MINORITY RULE: The Dictatorship of The Minorities in Britain

MINORITY RULE: The Dictatorship of The Minorities in Britain


The best ideas are often very simple, so is the truth when you find it, the realization that minority rule had replaced majority rule in this country was such a moment for me.

We are living in a dictatorship run not by an individual but by a collection of minority groups that have by stealth hijacked our political system, our society, our culture and freedom of choice, with virtually zero immigration control, all the major parties have leapfrogged each other to secure the huge and growing multicultural vote, and with all opposition silenced by law or political correctness the SHIELDS handed out to the minorities TO PROTECT THEM are now being used by them as CLUBS to beat the majority.

I expect most of you, like me, dread picking up a newspaper or turning on the television or radio, for fear of being enraged by another story of someone abusing the health, or immigration service, or literally getting away with murder, rape or violence because some money grabbing lawyer had found a way of using some section of the so called human rights law to help them avoid justice.

New words are introduced by these minorities to collectively label all opposition such as homophobic, racist and xenophobic, just like making up that word in a crossword that didn’t really exist to make things fit.

One of the words we keep putting in the wrong place is the word right when we mean privilege, we do this to justify the unfair treatment of the majority by the minority, and because the majority naturally don’t like it we then have to make up unfair laws to force them into going along with things.

I don’t believe it’s a human right to jump a queue, or gain a promotion or a special consideration because of the colour of your skin or your religious beliefs, or your sexual preferences.
I believe it’s a privilege.

I don’t believe it’s a human right to share in another societies wealth, its health service, it’s education system, its housing or its welfare benefits when you have never put anything in.
I believe it’s a privilege.

I don’t understand how it’s correct to have a newspaper called Black Britain, but not one called White Britain.

I don’t understand how you can have a commission for racial equality that is run exclusively by non-white people.

I don’t understand why a march or demonstration by any minority group is described as a celebration of their culture, but a march by the majority population to celebrate their colour or sexuality is instantly branded as racism or homophobia.

We are not in this situation by the desires of bad men or women, but by the most dangerous people in any society “The well intentioned do gooders” It is easy to fight against a vicious and cruel dictator their evil is obvious and actually unites people against them, taking comfort in the fact they are not alone.

It is good intent that has brought misery to millions of people on housing estates all over the country, with no protection from the pitiless torments of out of control youths.

It is good intent that has turned our prisons into soft touch drug riven universities of crime, feared only by the innocent who have never been in them and it is good intent that has destroyed the authority and respect for the police and the laws they try to uphold.

Our children go to schools where the disruptive bully runs the classroom, and the ultimate punishment for bad behaviour is removal to a school with more facilities and attention than is available to the well behaved left behind.

We live in a society where the elderly in care are forced to sell homes they worked for all their lives to subsidise their care, while limitless amounts are spent to feed, clothe and shelter illegal immigrants and their extended families from around the world.

We live in a society where in spite of the pill, and fourteen other forms of contraception, adoption and abortion on demand, we still encourage young girls to have babies without fathers, by providing them with homes they don’t have to pay for and money they don’t have to earn whilst making them the envy of their friends, yet in many instances married couples both go to work and are not able to see their own children grow up whilst trying to make ends meet.

I believe as more and more injustice is heaped on the majority it is simply a matter of time before pent up rage eventually explodes into civil disorder on a scale never seen in this country.

If we are to turn back the tide of political correctness destroying our culture we must empower the silent but angry majority by offering referendum voting on all major issues, like levels of immigration, the return of capital punishment, the re introduction of corporal punishment, zero tolerance of anti social behaviour and the abolition of laws that enslave the majority by giving to much power to the minority, it’s time to say NO MORE or see this country destroyed from within.

by Anon

Tories Renounce Election Pledge to Repeal the Human Rights Act

Tories Renounce “Daft” Election Pledge to Repeal the Human Rights Act as Lib Dems Confirm Cameron’s Leftward Plunge|  BNP News

The Conservative Party has formally renounced its election pledge to repeal the Human Rights Act even though this Labour and EU-backed law has been identified as one of the major avenues for the world’s swindlers to parasite off Britain.

The latest 180-degree policy shift by the Conservatives was confirmed by new Scottish Secretary and Lib Dem MP Danny Alexander in an interview with a Sunday newspaper.

Mr Alexander said the Conservative Party leadership had used the coalition talks as an “excuse” to get rid of the policies which they had no intention of carrying out.

Mr Alexander, who headed up the Lib Dem coalition negotiation team, said that his Conservative counterparts, William Hague and George Osborne, had “produced a list of Mr Cameron’s manifesto pledges and invited the Lib Dems to strike them out.”

The newspaper also reported that Mr Cameron’s “policy guru Steve Hilton was reportedly delighted that the coalition had enabled Mr Cameron to bury the Tory Right-wing.”

Mr Alexander reported back to his Lib Dem colleagues that “The Tories are ditching policies faster than they can list them. They pointed to them and said, ‘That can go, that can go.’ We thought, ‘If they are offering up all this, is there anything they will not do?’”

The policies specifically identified as scrapped include core Tory election promises, including the pledge to repeal the Human Rights Act.

This law has been used by criminals, terrorists and spongers from all over the world to win the right to stay in Britain, no matter how illegal or dastardly their acts have been.

Using the HRA, these parasites have been able to claim that deportation from Britain would “deny them the right to a family life” in this country.

The law was introduced by the Labour Party regime in order to align British law with EU Human Rights legislation.

Other policies abandoned by the Conservative Party leadership included the undertaking to “grab back powers from Brussels” and not to increase capital gains tax. 

Senior Lib Dem Lord Greaves confirmed Mr Alexander’s version of events, adding that the Tory negotiation team had even described their own party’s policy as “daft.”

According to Lord Greaves, the Lib Dem negotiating team said: “the Conservatives told them, ‘There is something in your manifesto we would like to concede, can you add it to your list?’ and ‘There are some things in our manifesto that are daft which we would be delighted if you would veto’.”

EU Launches Grab at National Economic Sovereignty

EU Launches Grab at National Economic Sovereignty BNP News

The European Commission has announced its intention to seize outright control of all EU member states’ economies under the pretext of preventing another Greek-style crisis.

The announcement, made at the end of last week, will see EU countries being forced to submit national budgets to Brussels for what is called “peer review” — before these budgets are even submitted to the parliaments of the individual nations.

The financial control is not expected to be limited to just euro zone member nations, although it is possible it will start out that way.

According to the official EC statement, the proposal will “reinforce decisively the economic governance in the European Union.

“An early peer review of fiscal policies would help shape a fiscal stance for the EU and the euro area as a whole.

"Union countries should begin co-ordinating preparations for national budgets and economic reforms.

"Member states would benefit from early coordination at European level as they prepare their national budgets and national reform programmes," the EU statement concluded.

The announcement is likely to cause headaches for David Cameron in particular. Although the Tory leadership has always been pro-EU, there is a significant section of the party which is highly Euro sceptic.

Mr Cameron’s previous public utterances on the EU have always been made to cater for the Tory right. His string of lies meant to deceive them included his obviously bogus “cast iron” promise to call a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, amongst others.

The new EU proposals also fly in the face of Mr Cameron’s election promise to “roll back” the powers of the EU.

In November last year, Mr Cameron announced he would “negotiate the return of Britain's opt-out in some areas of EU social and employment law, claw back powers in the criminal justice area and win a complete opt-out from the EU's charter of fundamental rights.”

In addition, he said that he would “change the law so that any future transfer of power to Brussels would have to be put to a referendum in Britain.”

Once again, the reality has exposed Mr Cameron’s lies. The Tory leader knows full well that it is not possible to “claw back” any powers from the EU’s new constitution.

There are only two options open to Britain: subservience along with all other European nations to the EU super state, or withdrawal.

For Mr Cameron to suggest anything else is simply a lie, and the British people will shortly see this for themselves.

The City of London Under Threat: The EU and Its Attack on Britain's Most Successful Industry 

Economic Tsunami Brews for Britain

Economic Tsunami Brews for Britain: Petrol, Interest Rates and Unemployment  BNP News 

 http://bnp.org.uk/

 

The inevitable consequence of decades of economic mismanagement has resulted in a triple whammy of rises in petrol, unemployment rates and an expected interest rate rise breaking over Britain.

Last week, unleaded petrol in Britain reached an average price of £1.21 per litre and experts warned that it could reach £1.30 within a few months.

A large proportion of this money already goes in tax. Currently, 56.19 pence of each litre price of unleaded petrol and diesel is tax.

This compares to 65.91 pence per litre for leaded petrol, 36.19 pence per litre for biodiesel and bioethanol, 22.16 pence per kilogramme for road fuel natural gas and 27.67 pence per kilogramme for road fuel liquefied petroleum gas ('LPG').

By way of contrast, petrol prices in many European countries have fallen by two percent in the last week. In Britain, the price of unleaded petrol has risen by 12 pence per litre since the beginning of the year, which has increased the average two-car family fuel bill by an extra £25 a month.

At the same time, the number of British people out of work has reached its highest level since 1971.

According to figures from the Office for National Statistics, some 10 million people are now classed as “economically inactive” and the number of unemployed has climbed to more than 2.5 million.

Youth unemployment has also increased with the number of 16 to 24-year-olds out of work climbing by 18,000 to 941,000.

While the Bank of England has kept interest rates at 0.5 percent for the last year, experts have predicted that they will rise early in the New Year.

Any rise will immediately cause huge problems for already overstretched consumers and some charities have predicted that more than five million homeowners will lose their homes within the next 12 months.

According to Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, some “5.4 million mortgage holders haven’t even thought about how they will pay their mortgage if interest rates go up.

“We know for a significant number of people, just keeping on top of their current mortgage repayments is a constant struggle,” Mr Robb was quoted as saying.

* The most important thing to be done to bring the economy under control again is to slash Government spending.

However, the new Con-Dem regime is as determined as its predecessor to increase spending on major outlays which are not in the state’s interests, such as the Afghanistan war, foreign aid, EU membership, immigration and asylum.

Only the British National Party has called for a halt to these expenditures. Taken together, these cuts will slice billions off the budget.

Blackburn magistrate who branded two boys 'absolute scum' after they desecrated a cathedral faces disciplinary action

 

from tabloid News 

 

A magistrate who branded two boys 'absolute scum' after they desecrated a cathedral faces disciplinary action.

The 16-year-old boys wrote racist and sexually-abusive graffiti in prayer books, and bent a priceless John The Baptist cross out of shape at Blackburn Cathedral, causing £3,000 damage.

Pages were also torn out of the prayer books and insults written in the prayer and visitor books included: 'I will kill all Jews. Don’t underestimate me', and lurid sexual comments about ‘the vicar'.

They were caught after they wrote their names in the visitors' book.

Chairman of the bench at Blackburn Magistrates' Court Austin Molloy labelled the boys 'absolute scum' during the sentencing yesterday at the Youth Court.

 

But he was immediately criticised by the court clerk who stood up and objected to the use of the 'inappropriate language'.

The mother of one of the boys said she would be making an official complaint.

Last month at Blackburn Magistrates' Court, Boy A pleaded guilty to damaging the cross, and Boy B to defacing and damaging the books following the incident last October.

Boy A was given an 18-month supervision order and a £1,500 fine, while Boy B was given a 12-month supervision order and a £100 fine after pleading guilty to defacing and damaging the books.

Magistrate Austin Molloy told them: 'This court is disgusted by the mindless destruction you have caused.

'Normal people would consider you absolute scum.

'If it was in our power, we would have you both stand in front of the congregation at 10am on Sunday and explain your words and actions to them to see if they could understand it, because we can't.'

Christine Dean, clerk of the court, stood and told the magistrate: 'It is totally inappropriate and unjust for you to use the term "absolute scum" in the youth court.'

The mother of Boy B also objected and said she would complain through official channels.

The boys, who are both from Darwen, carried out the attack after following a group into the cathedral one afternoon out of curiosity.

After the hearing last month, Police Constable Dave Hall said: 'They are both stupid teenage boys. It's possible they've no issues with Jewish people and are just uneducated.

'Because their names were written down, we assumed that was a lead, and compared their photos on the system to the CCTV. They were known to us.

'You kind of think that sort of place is exempt from these types of actions.'

The teenagers had been welcomed in by Canon Andrew Hindley, who asked them about their local churches.

In accordance with the cathedral's open door policy, Canon Hindley then left them to walk in alone, but asked the cathedral warden Jeff Robinson to watch them.

Mr Robinson saw the boys huddled over the visitors' book and on asking them what they were doing he received 'only grunts' before they walked away.

Canon Hindley said: 'We welcome young people into the cathedral and it is upsetting that they have behaved in such a disgraceful manner.

'The open door policy was abused and there was a breach of trust.'

Solicitors representing the boys said they were remorseful for the unpremeditated and immature acts.

A spokesperson for the Judicial Communications Office said: 'We do not comment on the sentencing remarks of magistrates, nor on advice given to the Bench by their legal adviser.

'If a formal complaint is received about the conduct of the magistrate in question it would be a matter for the local Advisory Committee to consider and, if necessary, the matter would be referred to the Office for Judicial Complaints.'

Can We Coexist With The Marxist Liberal Left?

Can We Coexist With The Left?

From the desk of Fjordman ,

The American writer Lawrence Auster had a debate with his readers regarding the possibility of splitting the USA along ideological lines. According to reader Tim W, modern Left liberalism is a universal totalitarian ideology, not a “live and let live” concept. The goal of its adherents is a world government from which no one can escape. Leftists “need conservatives but conservatives don’t need leftists. To be blunt, they can’t let us go. We’d be happy to be rid of them, because to us they’re nothing but parasites and/or oppressors. But they can’t get rid of us because we do most of the work, pay most of the taxes, provide the stability and morality that allow their depravity to thrive with less damaging results. Furthermore, the white conservative population is the buffer protecting white liberals from the minorities.”

A number of commentators questioned the viability of such a political division. Muslims believe not only that Islam is the best religion, but that it is the only true religion and that all people must be brought into its fold. Likewise, Leftists sincerely believe that Leftism is the only valid ideology, and that the whole world must be brought under its heel. Just like the very existence of self-governed communities outside of Islamic rule is considered an intolerable act of aggression by devout Muslims, so the existence of self-governed non-Leftist communities anywhere, at least if they happen to be white, is unacceptable to Leftist True Believers. They don’t just want to rule themselves; they want to rule everybody else as well.

Good arguments were presented in favor of secession, but opponents point out that attempted partition would likely trigger coercion and force when the ruling oligarchs fear losing control. If the Left sees everything it has promoted for generations about to be overturned it might resort to violence. Above all, opponents questioned whether the whole idea of “just wanting to be left alone” is defeatist and leaves the opponents with the initiative. Perhaps the battle cannot be won until we go on the offensive and take the ideological war to the enemy.

As reality is now, whites are considered potential extremists merely for existing, whereas the most revolting non-white organizations imaginable go free. For example, groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which has the stated goal of destroying Western civilization, are labeled “moderates,” whereas whites who want an immigration policy that prevents such people from settling in their countries are demonized as “racist extremists” by the media.

As Lawrence Auster says, white Leftists show “absolute moral disgust and horror against white non-liberals for their (almost always falsely imagined) discriminatory attitudes toward nonwhites. The only two moral actors in this script are the white liberals, who are good, and the white non-liberals, who are evil. The nonwhites are not moral actors in the script. They are the passive, sacred objects around whom the moral drama between good whites and evil whites is played out.”

In April 2010, the former left-wing US President Bill Clinton warned commentators to tone down their anti-government rhetoric for fear of inflaming hate groups, as polls suggested that public trust in the US government was at its lowest point for half a century. Clinton tried to conflate the anti-tax Tea Party movement with the 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist bombing, and implicitly voiced support for limiting certain forms of speech that might challenge the left-wing ruling regime. In an interview with The New York Times newspaper, Mr. Clinton was worried about the fact that “Because of the Internet, there is this vast echo chamber and our advocacy reaches into corners that never would have been possible before.” He warned against those who were too negative regarding the policies of Leftist politicians.
In 2009, the same Bill Clinton said that Americans should be mindful of their nation’s changing demographics, which led to the 2008 election of Obama as president. He told an Arab-American audience that by 2050 the U.S. will no longer have a majority of people with a European heritage and stated that “this is a very positive thing.” This was merely eight years after Arab Muslim terrorists staged the deadliest attack against the US mainland in peacetime, killing thousands of US citizens. Yet a dramatic increase in the number of Arab Muslims in his country does not worry Mr. Clinton at all. The only “terrorism” he is concerned about might be protests from people of European origins who oppose their own dispossession.

Bertha Lewis, the chief executive officer of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now or ACORN, spoke in March 2010 before the Young Democratic Socialists conference. There she predicted a USA headed toward violence that will “dwarf the internments during World War II.” Curiously, this statement was hardly reported in the mass media. She said that immigration is a big battle. “And the reason this is so important is, you know, here’s the secret: (whispering) We’re getting ready to be a majority, minority country. Shhhh. We’ll be like South Africa. More black people than white people. Don’t tell anybody.”

Lewis encouraged people, based solely on the color of their skin, to “get yourselves together, get strong, get big, and get into this battle,” the battle here just defined as the dispossession of whites. She’s the head of an organization that’s been a good friend of the current President Barack Hussein Obama. ACORN was a political issue in the 2008 United States Presidential Election over allegations of voter registration fraud. As President, Obama has repeatedly insulted staunch friends and allies of his country while openly siding with its Islamic enemies.

In April 2010 US President Obama, with unusual frankness regarding his anti-white coalition, appealed to “young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again” for continued “change,” essentially the manifestation of an intifada on European Americans. Notice that his message was essentially the same as that of the radical Bertha Lewis of ACORN, only slightly less openly militant. A few days later, the same Mr. Obama with astounding hypocrisy in an address urged both sides in the political debate to tone down their rhetoric. This because using phrases like “Socialists” in his view “closes the door to the possibility of compromise” and “can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.”

The problem is that extremist left-wing elements have received tacit approval for carrying out violence and intimidation for years. This trend is escalating because of thugs such as the Antifa groups in Western Europe. These Leftist vandals get away with what they do because they know they have the quiet backing of the media and the political elites. Also in 2010, the University of Ottawa in Canada cancelled a speech by the U.S. conservative writer Ann Coulter because organizers feared left-wing protesters would turn violent. The American Renaissance conference that same year met with extreme harassment, including death threats. Yet as AR leader Jared Taylor lamented, the story received virtually no coverage from the mainstream Western media, nor from Democratic Presidents Obama or Clinton. The question here is not whether you agree with the people at American Renaissance, the question is why a legal, white political organization cannot meet peacefully when Communists or organizations affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood can do so.

In her book A God Who Hates, the Syrian-born ex-Muslim Wafa Sultan comments on the Islamic “culture of shouting and raiding.” She states that “My experience has been that two Muslims cannot talk together without their conversation turning into shouts within minutes, especially when they disagree with each other, and no good can come of that. When you talk to a Muslim, rationally, in a low calm voice, he has trouble understanding your point of view. He thinks you have lost the argument. A Muslim conversing with anyone else – Muslim or non-Muslim – cannot remember a single word the other person has said, any more than my mother could remember a single word of what the preacher in our local mosque said.”

Former Muslim Ali Sina notes that “there is very little difference between the Left and Islam. What is lacking in both these creeds is the adherence to the Golden Rule. Just as for Muslims, everything Islamic is a priori right and good and everything un-Islamic is a priori wrong and evil, for the Left, everything leftist is a priori oppressed and good.” Facts don’t matter. Lying about opponents and their intentions is so widespread “that it is considered to be normal.”

After it was revealed that much of the data regarding alleged man-made global warming was deliberately fabricated, which constitutes one of the largest and most expensive anti-scientific frauds in history, most of its Leftist backers continued as if nothing had happened. The fact that they had promoted outright lies and slimed their opponents based on these lies mattered little. They believe they had the right to do so, as long as their intentions were right. Muslims, too, are allowed to lie to further the spread of their ideology. This strategy is called taqiyya.

Just like Muslims, both national Socialists and international Socialists totally lack respect for Socratic Dialogue, the reasoned search for truth which has been a hallmark of Western culture at its best. This is why such a large percentage of Western converts to Islam are either neo-Nazis or Marxists: These groups already think a great deal like Muslims. Their creed is the Absolute Truth, which should rule the world and must be imposed on others by brute force if necessary. They consequently have no need for reasoned debate. Others should submit to their rule or be violently squashed. End of story. People of European origins who stick to their cultural heritage constitute the embodiment of evil for Leftists, just like the infidels do for Muslims. Since white Westerners invented capitalism, some radical Socialists apparently believe that a “Final Solution” to the Capitalist Problem involves the annihilation of whites.

Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” should not be used lightly, but the writer Paul Weston is unfortunately correct here: What is happening with the native population throughout Western Europe is a state-sponsored campaign of ethnic cleansing. The only thing that’s unique about Britain is that Andrew Neather from the ruling Labour Party admitted this openly, in writing.
NATO, led by the USA, bombed the Serbs for “ethnic cleansing” back in 1999, thereby facilitating the Islamic ethnic cleansing of Christians in the Balkans. So, if the Western Multicultural oligarchs are against ethnic cleansing, I guess they must now bomb Britain, where the authorities have publicly admitted that they are deliberately displacing the native white population of their country. So why isn’t that happening? Could it be because very similar anti-white policies are currently followed in all Western nations without exception?

Let me add that I don’t think all Leftists have a well-thought-out plan to destroy the West. I have some in my immediate family, and they don’t think like this at all. They sincerely believe that what they are doing is the right thing. The hardcore ones who deliberately want to kill the West might be a minority, but at the end of the day this distinction matters little.

In many cases you can compromise, but in others you cannot. If somebody tries to poison you then you have to resist. It doesn’t matter in the long run whether those who do this do so because they deliberately want to kill you or because they are fools who accidentally kill you while intending to do something noble. The bottom line is: You die. You cannot be slightly dead, just like you cannot be slightly pregnant. If the Leftists and the Globalists have their way then our civilization will die, plain and simple. That’s why this ongoing struggle is likely to get ugly, because no compromise is possible. Since similar ideological struggles are taking place throughout the Western world, this situation could trigger a pan-Western Civil War.

suggested further reading

Ideological, bedfellows: college professors and the media tell us that there are right-wing totalitarians and there are left-wing totalitarians, but is ... An article from: The New American 

Great Ideas And Grand Schemes: Ideologies In the 19th and 20th Centuries 

The Colonisation of Britain: 104 Languages Now Spoken in Milton Keynes|

The Colonisation of Britain: 104 Languages Now Spoken in Milton Keynes|  BNP News

The rapid colonisation of Britain by the Third World continues apace with the news that the town of Milton Keynes now boasts inhabitants who speak over 104 different but mostly Third World languages.

The dramatic influx of colonisers has placed a huge burden on the council to pay for translation services for the tidal wave of immigrants who have settled in the town.

This cost will ultimately be transferred onto the taxpayers either through council tax increases or central Government subsidies.

According to reports, more than eight dozen languages, including obscure West African and Indian dialects, have arrived with waves of new migrants over the last decade.

The local authority has had to employ more than 300 interpreters to cope with the influx of spongers.

The Milton Keynes Community Language Service (MKCLS), paid for by the council, has increased the number of interpreters by 15 times over the past decade.

Only ten years ago it was required to provide interpreters for 12 languages, compared to the 105 now required.

Some of the languages indicate the extent of the Third World invasion, and include Twi, a language in Ghana; Telugu, spoken in India; and Yoruba, used in Nigeria.

Incredibly, preparations are underway to recruit a further 20 interpreters and the Afghan language Pashto will be added to the council’s repertoire by the end of the year.

The MKCLS provides a free 24-hour service to immigrants to enable them to “understand housing, health, police and legal matters” in Milton Keynes and the neighbouring towns of Luton, Bedford and Northampton.

What this means is that these fresh-off-the-boat immigrants have to be taught how to apply for benefits and how to deal with what seems to be an inevitable run-in with the police and criminal justice system.

“It's ridiculous that people are claiming benefits for years but can't even fill in a form about themselves in our national language,” Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance was quoted as saying in response to the news.