Take Note Bolton European Union Helps Everyone Except UK

European Union Helps Everyone Except Britain

The British National Party Newsroom

As British National Party MEPs prepared to vote in the final weeks of  last years European Parliament, the BNP renewed its call for withdrawal from the European Union (EU) as more UK money is being used to fund poor, developing and third world countries whilst UK industry suffers terminal decline and massive redundancies.

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is an EU body which administers a budget of €500m and its purpose is to help people suffering from being made unemployed and help them to reintegrate into the labour market.

According to the EU, the EGF was “created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns.”

In other words, due to the failed policies of globalisation many European countries face massive outsourcing of European jobs to third world countries as European workers could not compete with the low wage standard in the third world.

Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Austria, and even the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) as recognised by the EU have all benefited from the EGF.

Recently, EU MEP’s voted on The Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) in a motion whereby it was proposed that European and inevitably UK money will be used to prop up third world economies by investing €200 million to 10 third world ACP countries for four years.

In contrast, Britain has not received one penny from the EGF, though substantial portions of the EGF is funded from British taxpayers’ money.

Recently BNP MEPs voted on the following proposals to help other states who are suffering from redundancies forced by the failings of globalisation.

These include:

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in ICT wholesale trade in the Netherlands

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in diesel engine manufacturing in Poland

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the automotive sector in Spain

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the automotive industry in Poland

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in retail trade in Spain

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the textile sector in Spain

* Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of natural stone products in Spain

If passed, these states would all benefit from financial help.

Britain is also facing a massive decline in industry and has suffered a high number of redundancies. The BNP believes that British taxpayers’ money should be used to help alleviate the hardships our own industries instead of being used to help others.

As an example:

* The UK wholesale energy industry is facing criticism of its pricing policies. Three companies – British Gas, ScottishPower and Scottish & Southern have all increased prices, hitting our elderly at a time we are facing one of the harshest winters in decades. We believe that any portion of UK money currently sat in EU coffers should be reinvested back into helping our own wholesale trade industry, perhaps the energy industry in particular in order to lower energy prices.

* Manufacturing industry. Considering the recent depreciation of sterling, which helps to promote UK exports, we feel it would be wiser to reinvest UK funds back into the UK manufacturing industry. According to Confederation of British Industry (CBI) monthly Industrial Trends survey for December, a balance of 4 per cent more employers reported export orders being above normal rather than below it. With sterling currently weakening, we should reinvest UK funds currently sat in EU coffers back into our recovering export manufacturing industry.

* Automotive industry. In 2008 the automotive manufacturing sector employed more than 163,000 people but two years later it was down to 116,000 - that's a 28 per cent cut according Prof. Garel Rhys, chairman of Welsh Automotive Forum. We believe that UK funds should be reinvested back into the UK automotive industry.

* Retail trade industry. According to a recent report by The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) the recession has claimed over 6,000 insolvencies in the UK. We recommend that any UK portion of EU funds should be reinvested into helping those affected by insolvency.

* Textile industry. According to Co-operatives UK, a national trade body, textile jobs in Britain are lost at rate of one per hour. We say invest our portion of UK money residing in the EU back into helping our own textile industry

Naturally, none of these UK industries will receive any help whatsoever from the EGF.

It is important to make the point that the BNP does not oppose help being given to fellow Europeans hit by the failed policies of economic globalisation and the inevitable outsourcing of jobs to the third world, we only oppose UK taxpayers’ money being used for any other use than its reinvestment back into Britain.

The BNP believes that Britain should withdraw completely from the EU to ensure that all British taxpayers’ money is used solely for the benefit of British interests.

The Truth on Trial in Denmark

Truth on Trial in Denmark

The British National Party Newsroom 

 

A Danish author and historian is set to go on trial for his comments about Muslim sexual abuse and honour killings, in yet another country where the truth is no defence.

Lars Hedegaard, the president of The Danish Free Press Society, will appear in court in Denmark on 24 January on charges of “racism” for speaking about the issue of familial rape in Islamic cultures.

His supposed crime is stating that part of the so-called Muslim honour code includes the act of fathers raping their daughters as a punishment.

 
After drawing heavy fire from politically correct quarters in Denmark, Mr Hedegaard defended his comments by citing both recent honour crimes in Denmark and studies on the issue, including the British Crimes of the Community: Honour-Based Violence in the UK, which states that 17,000 women in Britain alone are victims of various honour crimes every year.

However, despite his reasoning, Mr Hedegaard’s chances in court do not look good, due to the anti-free speech laws entrenched in Denmark’s legal system.

A related case came to court just last month, when Danish MP Jesper Langballe was found guilty of “hate speech” for writing that some Muslims carry out honour killings on their daughters. In a trial reminiscent of Nick Griffin’s, when he dared to speak about the issue of Muslim grooming, Mr Langballe was summarily told that the truth is no defence.

In other words, the Danish “justice” system does not take into account whether a defendant is right or wrong, but merely if what he says could cause offence to those of other races or religions.

That being the case, Mr Langballe subsequently confessed, stating, "With this article in the penal code, I must be assumed convicted in advance. I have no intention of participating in this circus. Therefore I confess.”

He went on to criticise what he called a "culture of offence" that has taken root in Denmark and which is supported by its penal code. “In certain circles it has almost become a hobby to feel offended – by caricatures in a newspaper, by criticism of religion and so on,” he said.

The article to which he referred is Article 266b of the Danish Penal Code, which states:

“Whoever publicly or with the intent of public dissemination issues a pronouncement or other communication by which a group of persons are threatened, insulted or denigrated due to their race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, religion or sexual orientation is liable to a fine or incarceration for up to two years.”

Mr Langballe was sentenced to a fine of 5,000 Danish Kroner (approximately £565) or ten days in jail. Both Mr Hedegaard and Mr Langballe also have to face separate libel suits for their remarks in addition to their original court trials.

As in Britain and all other Western countries, free speech is only free if you agree with the government; otherwise it always carries a very heavy price.

Who are the Real Extremists?

Who are the extremists?

Written by BC1959    At the British Resistance Website

Thanks to our very own Bertie Bert, who actually managed to get comments printed online via ''The Guardian'' some time back, regarding the supposed extremist views of the British National Party, and the real, active, and deadly extremism of the establishment. Through this, it is possible to allow readers to sample what opponents call ''British National Party extremism'', and the established puppet governments of the last few decades ''mainstream policies''. Let's take a look at the supposed ''extremist views'' of the British National Party, then look at the actual acts and eventualities of Labour and Conservative governments. Obviously, we have limited time and space for something too detailed, but friend, foe, and potential supporter alike will get the message. THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY: A snapshot of major socio-economic-cultural policy. Immediate withdrawal from the EU, saving in total some £200 Billion, including around £60 Billion direct costs to tax payer. Immediate withdrawal from all foreign conflicts, saving in excess of some £4 Billion. Immediate restoration of a scientifically backed death penalty for serious criminals, including child murderers and Paedophiles. Immediate suspension of the ''Equality and Human Rights Act'', which specifically alienates and targets the indigenous peoples of Britain. Nationalise the banks, railways, and transport system, and invest in environmentally sound 21st century systems. Rip up the ''engineered for complexity'' directives that have strangled the rights of workers in Britain, and create a patriotic economically viable investment programme to create jobs, and manufacture products that are required not 'wished for'''. Create an ideas bank, whereby engineering and innovative ideas are produced for the benefit of Briton's, and then exported to foreign markets on a ''surplus to requirements and necessity basis''. Make the NHS more effective, less bureaucratic, and create a system whereby British born students are offered important posts such as surgeons, nurses, and doctors. Retrain British born parents who have had their children, and wish to return, or turn to nursing, this would take the strain off the benefits system, and stop the ''need'' for importing foreign nurses. Halt all benefits to foreign immigrants, and invest the money instead in providing traditional education for home grown youngsters and those in further education. Strengthen Britain's borders, and create a non-military, and military ''National Service'' for two years. No school leaver should enter the jobs market without some form of education in social awareness, helping the elderly, and cleaning up Lib/Lab/Con damaged towns and cities. Introduce a return of the ''Guild System'', so as to produce leaders in specialist fields such as the sciences, engineering, and medical professions. The Guild system should also have a secondary level, whereby those with no natural ability in evidence, can train in subjects such as building, plumbing, and traditional trades useful to the general economic and cultural viability of the nation. THE CONSERVATIVE AND LABOUR GOVERNMENTS: A snapshot of policies previously and currently in evidence from 1948. 1948: introduction of mass immigration, with the immediate effect of robbing our people of opportunities for work, and putting a further strain on the public purse. It is alleged that the original idea was based on a 7 year contract, and then once Britain was stable, immigrants would leaver the UK. The National Health Service introduced, and almost immediately, used along with the benefits system and Welfare State, it produces a debt burdened system that allows commonwealth citizens usage once in the UK. 1958: Harold Macmillan states that we've ''never had it so good'', but in reality all we got was buy now, pay later personal debt, and a national debt that was still being paid for Churchill's secret deals with the bankers. 1962: Reports of an increase in TB and other diseases put a further strain on resources. Stabbings and inter ethnic strife also put a strain on police in the Midlands. Labour win the 1964 general election, and immediately pretend to push forward with ''the white heat of technology''. In reality, the motorcycle industry is dealt a blow, with imports at a record high, and manufacturing hit by strikes from Communist union leaders. By 1968, a mix of immigration from Asia, Africa, and the West Indies sees tensions very high and the national debt increasing. 1965: Abolition of the death penalty for a 5 year trial period. In 1969, it was formally abolished. In those four years alone, the country sees a rise in child rapes and murders, and many more serious crimes including the shooting of police officers ''whilst in the line of duty''. The abortion act is passed in 1967, along with the ''legality'' of homo-sexuality. These two alone were enough to give the ''permissive society'', and homosexuals, rights to engage in both infanticide and lewd acts under law respectively should they wish. 1968: First coins in decimal currency introduced. In 1971, the whole of the UK's currency went decimal, and not a single referendum was allowed. Ted Heath signs a raft of treacherous directives and laws, enabling the EEC (EU), to essentially dictate to the people of Britain. Roy Jenkins and other politicians from both Labour and Conservative parties, employ propaganda to enforce laws which tightens the grip on free speech. 1973, Edward Heath signs Britain up to the supposed ''European Economic Community'', officially. Not too well known is the fact that it was Heath who originally suggested, or agreed, to cut England and Wales into ''Regions'', but stopped at simply ''altering the boundaries'' under the Local Government act. Labour govern the UK under a series of mishaps and possible collusion with ''foreign entities'', and results in manufacturing becoming less competitive. Margaret Thatcher becomes Prime Minister in 1979, and immediately starts to ''capitalise'' the UK. She sells off national assets, and foreign companies, MD's and former and serving politicians, all enjoy the benefits... except the British public. Under Thatcher, employment increases to three million, and over the next 30 plus years, treaties with the EU, increases the anti-British laws, mass immigration, illegal wars, and destruction of economic stability and real growth, enabling foreign bankers to drown the British people in a tide of massive personal, and national debt. 2010: The final solution regarding the ''evil white British'' is implemented. The Coalition carries on as did Tony Blair, who himself essentially sold British traditional values off like a set of cheap jewelry. The EU now makes up over 75% of law in Britain, and the Tri-Partate dictatorship insists that the UK is coming out of recession, even though no attempt at regaining it's independence or a referendum on getting out of the EU is on the cards. Debt is now permanent, and over £50 Billion in interest alone continues to hammer the indigenous peoples. Mass immigration through continued backing of Cameron, who wants Turkey to join the EU, keeps the tax payers under foot. Fuel prices and the cost of living is destroying home and business like never before, and bonuses are still a fat fact of life for Cameron's friends and relatives in the jolly world of ''what debt crises?'' banking. War is no end in sight, and crime is kept a lucrative business for anyone engaging in it, with jails at an all time maximum. Fraud is part and parcel of political life, and millions are going hungry and dying of cold. As stated, this is a simple snapshot, intended to show readers that the word ''Extremist'' is a grave lie when including it in the same sentence as the British National Party. As bertie bert often asks: ''Who Are The Extremists?'' The British people and the British National Party have not got the blood of the innocent on their hands, nor do we support foreign wars. Make your minds up now, for another ten years of the above, and our very culture will be engulfed by the treacherous war mongers, financiers, and political prostitutes and rent boys, whom will make us all know the real meaning of ''Extremism''.

Mosy UK People Want Lower Immigration, Yet They Continue to Vote for More ?

Nearly 80% of People Want Lower Immigration, Yet They Continue to Vote for More

The British National Party Newsroom

Nearly four out of five people in Britain want to see a reduction in immigration, a Government survey has revealed.

The poll, commissioned by the Department for Communities and Local Government, shows that 78% of people in England and Wales want to see immigration into the UK cut back. Twenty-four per cent of participants said they would like to see immigration reduced a little, while 54% said they wanted it cut “a lot”. Conversely, only nineteen per cent said levels should stay the same, and just three per cent said there should be more.

These statistics are all the more remarkable considering that in addition to the 10,000 participants from England and Wales, the survey also added the views of two “boost samples” of 5,000 “ethnic minorities” and 1,200 Muslims, suggesting that it is not just the indigenous people of these islands that want to see immigration slashed.

This begs the question as to why such high numbers of people continue to vote for parties that have created the mass immigration problem in the first place and will only continue to worsen it.

Unfortunately, many may have been fooled by Prime Minister David Cameron’s posturing on the promise of an “immigration cap”, an impossible pledge for a country that is open to unlimited immigration as a member of the European Union.

Mr Cameron’s loophole-riddled promise of reducing visas for less skilled workers from outside Europe by a pathetic 6,300 a year is a pointless drop in the ocean for a country that lets in nearly 600,000 immigrants annually. It is made all the more insignificant by his scrapping of limits on intra-company transfers, his commitment to the EU/India Free Trade Agreement, which will ensure another 20,000 Indians per year gain access to work in Britain's IT sector alone, and his febrile desire to hasten Turkey’s accession to the EU.

The British National Party is the only party that promises to halt all immigration into Britain, with no misleading talk of caps, quotas or politically correct “moratoria”. If this policy is “racist”, then so is the majority of the population.
Please Donate to the British National Party Here 

The Patron Saint of UK Marxism

The patron saint of Stalinism

Written by The Pilgrim   at the British Resistance Site
Few people nowadays know the name Harry Pollitt, but he was perhaps one of the most influential people in Britain during the twentieth century.  For many years he was the leader of the Communist Party, and narrowly missed out on winning a seat in parliament in 1945.  He admired the mass-murderer Stalin, and was feted as a hero by the Soviet Union. Communist Party membership reached a peak in 1945, declining thereafter.  This did not however mark the decline of communism in Britain – far from it.  The Daily Mail writer Peter Hitchens records that: Just after the Second World War, the leader of the British Communist Party, Harry Pollitt, went to Cambridge to speak to a gathering of highflying young Left-wingers. He told them: 'Don't join the Communist Party. Work hard, get good degrees, join the Establishment and serve the cause from within.' No doubt he made a similar trip to Oxford. Another Daily Mail writer, Sue Reid, records that these young lefties “were soon exercising considerable influence in universities, the state education system, publishing houses, the legal hierarchy, and the civil service.”  She does not mention the church, but I would be surprised if not one Oxbridge leftie from the 1940s ever found his way into the clergy. The only senior clergyman I can think of in this country with openly communist leanings was Hewlett Johnson, known as the red dean.  However he was already established as a clergyman and a communist long before Pollitt spoke at Cambridge. Most of the young men who heard Pollitt’s rallying cry back in the 1940s are probably dead by now.  Any who remain alive are probably long since retired from whatever professions they entered all those years ago, but I have a sneaking suspicion that their influence lives on. A common feature of communist sympathisers is their callousness, their belief that the benefits of communism justify the deaths of millions of people.  Another is their hypocrisy, for how many of them seek to justify or even mitigate the atrocities committed by Hitler or Mussolini or Franco? We can perhaps gauge the extent to which Pollitt’s influence is still felt in this country by considering this quote from the website of the Methodist Church: Second is the myth that everyone who votes for the BNP is a committed Nazi. People vote for the BNP for a whole number of reasons - as a protest, out of fear, out of resentment - and although their decisions should be challenged, these people should not be demonised and dismissed. The fact that the Methodist Church is quite happy for its premises to be used for hustings meetings from which BNP candidates are excluded might suggest that they are not being entirely honest here.  Also, implying that at least some BNP voters are Nazis is undeniably a form of demonization.  Yet for all this, how often do the leaders of the Methodist Church, or any church, speak out against communism?  For example, we know that communism is alive and well in the Labour Party, but the churches never tell their flocks not to vote Labour. I don’t suppose Harry Pollitt, were he alive today, would regard Britain as bearing much resemblance to his vision for a Stalinist wonderland, but all the same it may be many years before the British establishment can rid itself of the stain of communist thinking which can be traced back to that speech at Cambridge more than sixty years ago. But to end on a lighter note, back in the 1980s the BBC gave us a glimpse of what life might be like under a communist regime.  Enjoy.

Muslim Paedophiles Running Amok in Multicultural England

Muslim Paedophiles Run Amok in Multicultural England

Just a few of the past TheOPINIONATOR  at http://theopinionator.typepad.com/my_weblog/ posts on muslim paedophiles running amok in England. Remember these muslim predators are and continue to be protected by the blind allegiance to political correctness and Multiculturalism that has infested our government, schools, police service, etc. Our children are paying an egregiously high price for "diversity".
MUSLIM MEN RAPE FOUR BRITISH SCHOOLGIRLS AT AMUSEMENT PARK
Muslim Asylum Seeker Poses as Boy then Rapes Girl in Same Children's Care Home
More Muslim Paedophiles Arrested in Britain
Muslim Millionaire Pedophiles Buying British Little Girls for Sex
Muslim Pedophile Rape Gang Arrested in Rotherham
British Judge Refuses to Deport Illegal Immigrant Muslim Pedophile
MUSLIM MAN KIDNAPS 14 YR OLD BRITISH GIRL FOR SEX
MUSLIM TAXI DRIVERS RAPING BRITISH GIRLS & WOMEN

Link between child porn and Muslim terrorists discovered in police raids

 

Muslim Paedophile Rapes 12 Year Old Girl

 

Muslim Pedophiles Rape British Taxpayers

Gang of 'Asian' Pedophiles Trying to Abduct Girls in Croydon England

January 10, 2011

Sex slavery and Britain’s conspiracy of silence

Daily Mail, 10 January 2011
Not for the first time, Jack Straw has ignited a firestorm of controversy by expressing serious concerns about behaviour within the British Muslim community.

Mr Straw, whose Blackburn constituency is heavily populated by Muslims, spoke out after two British men of Pakistani descent were jailed last week for a series of rapes and sexual assaults on vulnerable young girls, whom they also groomed for sex with other gangs members or their relatives.

This was far from a one-off case. Police operations going back to 1996 have revealed a disturbingly similar pattern of collective abuse involving small groups of Muslim men committing a particular type of sexual crime.
This has typically involved abducting, raping or otherwise sexually attacking hundreds of mainly white girls aged 11 to 16, as well as enslaving them through alcohol and drugs and grooming them for sex.
Mr Straw said the reason was that some British Pakistani men regarded emotionally ‘vulnerable’ white girls as ‘easy meat’ whom they trapped through plying them with gifts and drugs.
The reaction to his remarks from certain quarters was all too predictable.
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said Straw’s comments were ‘pretty dangerous’. Others accused him of being ‘inflammatory’ or ‘stereotyping’ an entire community.
What all this merely illustrated, however, was the politically correct denial which exculpates the guilty by ruling out of bounds any criticism of the community to which they belong.
For far too long, this has served to suppress an absolutely vital debate which desperately needs to be had.
For while, of course, most Muslims repudiate any kind of sexual crime, the fact remains that the majority of those who are involved in this particular kind of predatory activity are Muslim.
The picture is certainly complicated. The overwhelming majority of people who are convicted in general of sex crimes — including sexual abuse within families — are white men.
Nevertheless, we do now know that most cases of gang-led, on-street grooming that have come to light involve British Muslim offenders and young white girls.
Most disturbingly, the police say that these convictions form only a small proportion of a ‘tidal wave’ of such crimes. Yet, until now, there has been a conspiracy of silence over this phenomenon.
Charities such as Barnardo’s won’t even discuss the cultural background of such criminals. The Home Office refuses to collect such statistics. And, of course, the Guardianistas condemn any such analysis as ‘racialising crime’.
Actually, there is more than a grain of truth in that particular criticism. For this is certainly not a racial issue. Indeed, one of the many red herrings in this debate is that — if cultural characteristics are discussed at all — the gangs tend to be described as ‘Asian’.
But this is to besmirch Sikhs, Hindus, ­Chinese and other Asians. For these ­particular gang members are overwhelmingly Muslim men. And the common ­characteristic is not ethnicity, but religion.
For these gang members select their victims from communities which they believe to be ‘unbelievers’ — non-Muslims whom they view with disdain and hostility.
You can see that this is not a racial but a religious animosity from the fact that, while the vast majority of the girls who are targeted are white, the victims include Sikhs and Hindus, too.
Back in 2007, The Hindu Forum Of Britain claimed that hundreds of Hindu and Sikh girls had been intimidated by Muslim men who took them on dates before terrorising them until they converted.
And the Sikh Media Monitoring group described ‘the deliberate and targeted sexual degradation of Sikh women purely because of their religion’ and how a minority of young Muslim men boasted about ‘seducing the Kaffir (unbeliever) women’.
Nevertheless, there is a particular problem with white girls. They are targeted because the men involved in these offences do not regard Muslim girls in the same way as sexual objects to be shared by all.
One Muslim man was reported as saying that white girls are targeted by such men because ‘if they did it to a Muslim girl, they’d be shot’.
White girls also tend to be seen as sluts. Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, a national Muslim youth organisation, says: ‘These people think that white girls have fewer morals and are less valuable than our girls.’
What seems to have taken place is therefore a tragic conflation of certain primitive, religiously based attitudes towards women and unbelievers — and the degraded way in which certain white girls behave.
For in this debauched British society, highly-sexualised behaviour by even pre-teens is ignored, excused, condoned or encouraged.
Who can be surprised that young white girls willingly go with these sexual predators who pick them up when so many stagger in and out of pubs and nightclubs in a drunken haze wearing clothes that leave little to the imagination and boasting of ‘blow jobs’ or how many guys they have ‘shagged’?
Who can be surprised when even sex education materials in schools advise on oral sex and other sexual practices; teen-targeted magazines, clothing and popular culture are saturated by sexuality; and family life has often disintegrated into a procession of mum’s casual pick-ups and gross parental indifference, leaving young girls desperate for affection from any quarter?
The disgust felt by some Muslim youths at such sexually promiscuous girls can then feed into a more general hatred and hostility towards Britain and the West. Such youths form themselves into gangs bound by a common feeling of being outsiders united by a profound hostility to the society into which they were born.
But because they are indeed also part of British society, and have therefore been exposed to an education system which gives them precious little education about Britain and even less moral ­guidance, such youths often descend into the same pit of drugs, alcohol and sex as their ‘unbeliever’ peers.
Yet they come from backgrounds where, all too often, women have second-class status — a world in which some particularly extreme communities have a mindset that divides them into either virginal slaves to their husbands or prostitutes.
The resulting conflict set up in the minds of these British Muslim boys sometimes creates a disgust that turns upon the ‘slags’ and ‘slappers’.
Or — far more lethally — it leads to a self-disgust which makes them vulnerable to the message that they can purify themselves by destroying the society that has led them into such evil and ungodly ways.
It is remarkable that, even though the obscenity of rape and the inviolable rights of women over their bodies are among the shibboleths of the age, feminists and other liberals are almost totally silent when Muslims violate these sacred codes.
Muslim women are often treated abominably within their communities. But to their suffering, feminists and other right-on liberals are almost totally silent. The only sound from that lobby is the cry of ‘racist’ or ‘bigot’ hurled at anyone who dares protest at such religious slavery.
Some Muslim sexual predators may now be behind bars. Others, according to the police, may still be very much at large.
But it is multicultural, reverse-racist, sickeningly hypocritical Britain which is actually in the dock.

Comments Please a Article from Simon Darby Blog

Comments Please - By Simon Darby

Written by Copied from the site of Simon Darby

January 2011

The following article has been copied over from the site of Simon Darby, the former British National Party Deputy Leader.  It certainly provides a lot of food for thought and a lot of information on how the state conspires against the British People.  To me the second part of Simon's article is of more importance than the first.  Read it and see what you think.  Take it away Simon.................. Not too disappointed with last night's result in Oldham the main priority being that the British National Party gets back into business after a difficult 2010. The great response of activists and sense of comradeship will have all of those involved eager for the forthcoming Barnsley Central contest. After visiting the Oldham constituency twice this week, I said to Nick that if our vote doesn't come out then it will not be through lack of support. That might seem somewhat paradoxical but those who witnessed the amount of goodwill and respect for the BNP from people on the streets will understand that very well. Despite a tremendous effort by Derek, Clive, Jock and others the cold fact remains that the main parties have now drifted streets ahead of us when it comes to campaigning technique and the subsequent ability to connect with the electorate. Further to this we are not dealing with a level playing field here either. As well as utilising the police to throw our chap out of hustings meetings and a totally biased media we were well and truly outspent by the other parties. Of course it's no wonder we didn't have the finances to fight this election as we should, it was only last month that the state-funded EHRC failed in its attempt to jail our chairman and bankrupt the party in the process. That's an important paragraph, that last one because it highlights the fact that just by being able to seriously contest Oldham was a victory in itself. If all had gone to plan we should have been destroyed by now, but the fact is we are still here much to the obvious annoyance of those who would wish to sweep their crimes against the British people under the carpet for good. If anyone thinks that this blog this morning consists of nothing but fanciful excuses, then please examine this next item which I consider to be major breaking news. The exclusive photos below clearly show the recently exposed undercover police officer Mark Kennedy (in dark clothes with green rucksack) and guess where they were taken? At a recent UAF protest against our RWB festival in Derbyshire. Think about the implications for a minute, that's a police officer trying to disrupt and sabotage the activity of a perfectly legal political organisation. If you have kept track of this story in the Guardian you will understand the implications of what has been going on here. We are talking about a multi-million pound state budget and hundreds of undercover operatives. Just how many of those assets are now actively involved in trying to sabotage the BNP? No doubt many of you will see far wider implications and conclusions to myself, but I now think I understand very well why the Metropolitan Police refused to prosecute the individual clearly caught on camera throwing darts at our MEPs along with the other rioters. You will probably not know this, but last night our chairman and MEP for the north west of England was invited to a question and answers session concerning the recent film "Battle for Barking". Outside the Frontline Club a gang of UAF thugs tried to attack Nick and his security team. The police just stood by and watched and the "left" even boast about this here. I just wonder how much of this intimidation is actually state-sponsored and under such circumstances I am so proud of this party. They simply don't understand that this makes us even more determined. See you in Barnsley.

Asbestos: Live with it, UK Minister tells pensioner

Asbestos: Live with it, Minister tells pensioner

  Martin Wingfield AT Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 
FOR the past 18 months, the Constituency office of Nick Griffin MEP has been trying to help a pensioner who has been left to live in a bungalow built with asbestos.


 Asbestos is a silicate mineral formerly used commercially for its desirable physical properties. The inhalation of asbestos fibers can cause serious illnesses, including malignant lung cancer, mesothelioma (a formerly rare cancer strongly associated with exposure to amphibole asbestos), and asbestosis (a type of pneumoconiosis). Long exposure to high concentrations of asbestos fibers is more likely to cause health problems, as asbestos exists in the ambient air at low levels, which itself does not cause health problems.
The European Union has banned all use of asbestos and extraction, manufacture and processing of asbestos products.
After his office had explored every avenue available seeking help for the pensioner, Nick Griffin wrote to the Housing Minster and his letter lays out the full history of the pensioner's predicament.The letter to protect the identity of the constituent.



The Right Hon Grant Shapps MP
Minister for Housing and Local Government
Communities and Local Government
Eland House
Bressenden Place
London
SW1E 5DU
Dear Mr Shapps
Re: Presence of Asbestos in Former Social Housing Property
I write to with regard to a case I have been looking into on behalf of one of my constituents, a pensioner from Frizington in West Cumbria. He approached me last March for assistance with an asbestos problem in his bungalow.
He, along with a number of other people in his area, purchased his home from the social housing provider, Home Housing. The properties, built by Home in the 1970’s, conformed to the relevant building regulations in place at the time, which allowed the use of asbestos.
A ban on the use of blue and brown asbestos was introduced in 1985, followed by white asbestos in 1999, so Home would have been aware at the point of sale that the properties contained this now banned substance, primarily in the ceiling of the heating cupboards. They chose, however, not to share this information with the prospective purchasers.
In 2005 British Gas, repairing a boiler on one of the similar houses on the estate, discovered the asbestos. Subsequent surveys revealed that it was present in my constituent’s house and many other similar properties formerly or still owned by Home Housing. The work to replace boilers undertaken by British Gas on these properties exposed the sheeting (which contained white and brown asbestos), rendering it a health hazard. Home Housing subsequently arranged for the asbestos to be removed by specialists from the properties they still owned. They declined to do this, however, or to contribute to the very substantial costs of specialist removal, for the properties they had sold to my constituent and others on the estate.
He now fears that he and his wife are at risk from the asbestos they cannot afford to have removed. He knows of at least 25 of his neighbours, and other home owners from nearby estates in Frizington, who are in a similar predicament. They have been advised by a solicitor that they would have a legal case against Home Housing for compensation, but they are not, apparently, eligible for legal aid and cannot afford to fund a legal action.
They raised their concerns with their local Labour MP, Jamie Reed, but my constituent says that after showing some initial interest, they heard nothing further from him. He then raised the matter with me, as his MEP. My office has engaged in a lengthy correspondence with Mr Mark Henderson, Chief Executive of Home Housing, regarding this matter. Mr Henderson takes the view that Home does not owe a duty of care to my constituent in relation to the presence of any asbestos that is present in his property, relying on the caveat emptor principle and holding that it was those conveyancing for my constituent who owed a duty of care to ensure that the property was adequately surveyed.
It is not clear to me that a Court would necessarily agree that Home Housing were justified in deliberately withholding a material fact - the presence of asbestos sheeting - in the properties they were selling. A fact which, if disclosed, would certainly have affected the price they were able to secure for these properties, assuming they were able to sell them at all without first decontaminating them of asbestos. In equity if not law Home Housing’s conduct towards a group mostly comprised of their elderly and far from prosperous former tenants seems very hard to justify. This is not the level of morality one expects of a social housing provider, and further calls into question the wisdom of privatising the provision of social housing, which my Party would not have done.
However, I find more compelling Mr Henderson’s implicit argument that, were Home Housing to concede any liability in this matter, they would lay themselves open to a potentially ruinous spate of similar claims affecting hundreds of properties they have sold off over the years. Bringing about the ruin of a major social housing provider is not, to my mind, in the public interest given the growing pressure on the availability of housing for the less well-off applied by a combination of massive immigration and the recent cuts in housing benefit and support.    
Nonetheless it is intolerable that British pensioners should be forced to endanger their health in properties they bought in good faith and oblivious of the asbestos risk, because they cannot afford to decontaminate them. Given that compelling the vendor to finance these works, albeit fair and equitable, would cause wider hardship to even more, again mostly poor and elderly people, the only remaining way forward would seem to me to be assistance from the public purse.
I therefore appeal to you, on behalf of my constituent and the hundreds of others who likewise find themselves in this plight through no fault of their own, to provide a one-off grant from public funds to pay the cost of making their homes safe again where they cannot afford to do so themselves. Such a means-tested one-off grant would seem to me to be fair in the circumstances. The more so as it is the fault of government that there is not a crystal clear legal duty on sellers to disclose material defects in the goods they are selling at the time of sale. As my constituent’s case illustrates, the principle of caveat emptor is too easily the refuge of the rogue, from which they are free to wash their hands of the innocent victims who suffer the consequences.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin, MEP
North West Parliamentary Constituency
Constituency Office: 01697 344480
Email: contact@nickgriffin.eu
PO Box 107, Wigton, Cumbria CA7 0YA
There was no help forthcoming from the Housing Minister, so Nick broke the disappointing news to the pensioner.
Dear Mr *****
Re: Presence of Asbestos Sheeting in Your Home
Please find attached, for your information, a copy of the letter received from the Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP, Minister for Housing and Local Government (dated 15th December 2010), in response to my letter of 10th November 2010).
The Minister is not, unfortunately, willing to act on my suggested resolution to your situation (and indeed the many others who are affected by the presence of asbestos in their homes) - i.e. that his department should make available a one-off, means-tested grant to people like yourself, who cannot afford to decontaminate their homes from asbestos. 
Mr Shapps enclosed a copy of the Tenant Services Authority complaints factsheet with his letter. I have not forwarded this to you, as I am aware you have already been refused help by the Housing Ombudsman Service because you own your property.
As neither Home Social Landlord nor the Ministry for Housing and Local Government is prepared to intervene to help you with your case, I’m afraid it appears that the only option available to you is to pursue action through the courts.
Please do not hesitate to contact me again if you require any further assistance.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin, MEP
North West of England Parliamentary Constituency

British National Party MEPs and their offices working well together

MEPs and their offices working well together

  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffins Mep Euro News

JANUARY 2011: IN the European Parliaments in Brussels and Strasbourg our two British National Party MEPs and their teams of political advisers work closely together on voting lists and committee reports. Back in Britain so do their constituency offices.

Here's an example of the co-operation, with the work of one MEP helping an enquiry from the a constituent of the other.
A letting agency covering rural Lancashire wrote to Nick Griffin's office concerning a new EU law is to prohibit the sale of domestic heating oil to customers after 2013.
The proprietor of the firm wanted to know the details and how it might effect his portfolio of properties
Constituency Office manager Tina Wingield replied:
"May I direct you to reports which were published on the website of Andrew Brons MEP, on 15th July 2009.
As the exchange below between Mr Brons and the Council and Commission well illustrates, EU policy making is often as clear as mud!
In short, the Energy Using Products Directive does not introduce directly binding requirements for specific products, but it does define conditions and criteria for EU-wide rules. The timescale for national governments to ensure that their domestic market conforms to the set requirements varies from product to product. At the present time, it appears that the implementing measures for oil fired domestic boilers in the UK have yet to be definitively set. While 2013 was set as a target date, it may be that as a result of the consultation process with stakeholders, this date could be extended.
I will, of course, advise you when I gain further information on exactly when the law in the UK will change.
Mr Brons was asked by a number of his constituents to try to persuade the European Parliament to postpone the implementation of the Energy Using Products (EuP) Directive (2009/125/EC). To this end, he submitted a Written Question to the European Council on 5th August, asking:
“Is the council aware that:
1.  1.1 million homes in the United Kingdom are heated by oil fired heating boilers and that the directive will prevent them from buying replacement boilers from 2013
2.  Most of these homes are not connected to the gas pipelines and cannot easily be connected
3.  The new style boilers emitting low levels of NOx are too large to fit into the average kitchen
4.  Homes in the UK need to fit central heating boilers in their kitchens because most homes do not have suitable cellars or outhouses in which to put them.
Would the Council consider granting the United Kingdom a five year derogation from the Directive so that it did not come into operation until 2018?
This would enable the boiler manufacturing industry to develop new technology to produce smaller low NOx emitting boilers that would fit into an average kitchen?”
Mr Brons received the following reply from Mr Piebalgs on behalf of the European Commission on 14th September:
"Under the ecodesign for energy using products Directive(1) a technical, environmental and economic analysis (‘preparatory study’) on boilers was carried out(2), and, amongst others, NOx emissions were identified as a significant environmental aspect.
The Commission is currently in the consultation and preparation phase of the relevant Eco-design measure, and will only later table a draft measure on this issue. After a vote in the competent Committee, this measure will then go to the Council and the Parliament for scrutiny before the final adoption by the Commission.
The Commission is well aware of the particular conditions of using/installing boilers in the United Kingdom (UK). Possible ecodesign requirements on NOx emissions (and further significant environmental aspects) will consider the effects on the UK replacement market, the energy supply infrastructure and the usage conditions, with a view to fulfil the provisions of the Ecodesign Directive, and in particular its Article 15 which requires i.a. that ecodesign implementing measures shall not have a negative impact on the functionality of the product and on the affordability for the consumer.
The levels of NOx emissions and the timetable of a possible entry into force are currently discussed with all stakeholders (including industry as well as consumer and environmental organisations) and Member States in the context of the Ecodesign Consultation Forum(3). As required by Article 15 of the Ecodesign Directive, levels and timing will take into account the impacts on manufacturers, e.g. the possible need for re-design of products and possible associated costs, including on UK manufacturers of oil and kerosene boilers, in particular SMEs.
More information on the ecodesign policy can be found at: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/ecodesign/eco_design_en.htm
(1)   Directive 2005/32/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 191, 22.7.2005.
(2)   www.ecoboiler.org
(3)   The Commission staff working document for the meeting of the Consultation Forum that took place end June 2009 suggests 105 mg/kWh by 2014, while Eurofuel suggests 120 mg/kWh by 2015
Mr Brons also received the following reply from the European Council on 12th October 2009:
"The Council assumes that the Honourable Member is referring to the ongoing consultations relating to boilers, led by the Commission, of Member States and stakeholders under Articles 15(4) and 18 of the Ecodesign of Energy Using Products Directive(1), that could lead to the adoption of an implementing measure concerning such products as provided for by Article 15 of the Ecodesign Directive.
It is therefore up to the Commission to decide if and when it will present a draft implementing measure to that effect and to consider the appropriateness, in that context, of a derogation as advocated by the Honourable Member. Only then will the Council be called upon to decide on the proposal, if it is not accepted by the Committee established in conformity with Article 19 of the directive. In that event, the Council will, in its deliberations on the proposal of the Commission, of which the European Parliament will also be informed, take due account of the information provided by the Honourable Member.”
(1)   Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 191, 22.7.2005, p. 29.

British National Party Will Fight UK Barnsley Central By-Election

British National Party Will Fight Barnsley Central By-Election

  BNP News

The British National Party will contest the Barnsley by-election, caused by the resignation of convicted Labour Party criminal MP Eric Illsey, the party has announced.

Preparations are already underway to select a candidate, and an announcement in this regard will be made at a special meeting in the constituency on 29 January, reports Doug Ward, Yorkshire British National Party press officer.

Created in 1983, Barnsley Central covers a similar area to that of the former Barnsley constituency. It is considered a safe Labour seat.

In the 2010 election, British National Party candidate Ian Sutton polled 3,307 votes, one of the highest in Yorkshire.

This was up substantially from the British National Party vote in the 2005 election, when some 1,403 people put their cross next to the party’s name. That year was also the first time that the British National Party contested the constituency.

All activists are urged to make plans to attend the campaign meeting on 29 January. Details will be released shortly.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British national Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

British People Put Last: Cuts to Police Budget to “Increase Crime” As Foreign Aid Rises

British People Put Last: Cuts to Police Budget to “Increase Crime”

The British National Party Newsroom

Cuts to the police budget in favour of an increase in the foreign aid budget will cause an increase in crime, the Police Federation and think tank Civitas have warned.

The 2009 police budget was some £14 billion last year. It will now be cut by 20 percent over the next few years, meaning that total spending on protecting the British public against crime will be less than the £12.1 billion foreign aid budget.

To make matters worse, the Police Federation has now warned MPs that the cuts, introduced by the ConDem regime to allegedly try and bring down the government deficit, will inevitably result in an increase in violent crime.

Police Federation chairman Paul McKeever told the home affairs select committee that the cuts would cause a “revolution in policing which would have unintended consequences."

He gave the example of New York City, where a reduction in the number of officers had led to more "rapes, murders and robberies."

The insane redundancy plans are also designed to strip the police of its most experienced officers first, as only policemen with 30 years' service can be made redundant.

For its part, think tank Civitas released a report which revealed that "a nation with fewer police is more likely to have a higher crime rate."

Civitas conducted a comparison of the number of police officers and the number of recorded offences per 100,000 people in European countries to prove its point.

The report, titled “2011: The Start of a Great Decade for Criminals?”, said reducing police numbers could “lead to an increase in the crime rate.

“England and Wales currently has a smaller number of police officers per 100,000 than the European average and has a higher crime rate than average,” the report said.

“There is a prima facie case to suggest that this relationship may be causal since the main purpose of a police force is to protect the public and prevent crime. In other words, it is plausible to suggest from the data that reducing the number of police officers in any given country could lead to an increase in the crime rate."

“While police numbers and resources are far from the only contributor to police effectiveness, it seems highly unlikely that the swingeing cuts now being enacted will be made without significantly decreasing detection rates,” the Civitas report continued.

“The result will be that offenders will be able to engage in criminal acts with a reduced risk of being caught and sanctioned, making criminal acts less risky and more attractive for potential offenders.

“As a result, it is possible that recent falls in crime will be halted or even reversed. Members of the public are at greater risk of crime in the coming years,” the Civitas report concluded.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Grooming issue dominates Nick Griffins MEP's mailbag

Grooming issue dominates MEP's mailbag

  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 

OUR MEP's Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield, reports that correspondence detailing constituents concerns about the grooming of young white girls by Muslim men make up a high percentage of Nick Griffin's mailbag.


 "Letters and emails on this sensitive subject having been coming in from day one and our office have replied to everyone as well as contacting the relevant authorities and advising on actions that can be taken," Tina (right) told this website.
"This was a letter that Nick to the Senior Crown Prosecutor, Rochdale and Bury Crown Prosecution Service on 8th September 2009. It does show that Nick alerted the authorities directly. I have anonymized his letter to protect the identity of the constituent and victim."
"I have been contacted by one of my constituents, in connection with a case of Sexual Grooming. While I appreciate that criminal matters do not come within the responsibility of the European Union or its Parliament, I feel I must write on his behalf.
My constituent has told us that he is devastated by the Crown Prosecution Service’s decision not to prosecute the perpetrators in this case, on the two grounds stated (cross-contamination of DNA evidence and the victim’s alleged sexual history with one of the perpetrators).
My constituent’s daughter has suffered considerable trauma as a result of the criminal actions of the four men originally charged in this case, and he is concerned that the failure of the criminal justice system to secure any form of conviction against them, despite the fact that the victim was a minor at the time of the incident, will adversely affect her recovery process. Co-ordinated Sexual Grooming which appears to be carried out disproportionately by Muslim paedophile gangs, is an increasing problem in the North West region and there seems to be a general reluctance on behalf of the criminal justice system to confront it. This failure to bring the perpetrators to justice compounds the suffering of the victims and leaves children open to abuse.
The gang involved in the crime against my constituent’s daughter are still operating in the local vicinity and, in the interests of community protection, he requests that the Crown Prosecution Service reconsiders its decision not to pursue a prosecution in this case.
Thank you for your attention in this matter."

Islamic Paedophile Gangs Have Been Operating for “Decades,” Admits Former UK Police Chief

Muslim Paedophile Gangs Have Been Operating for “Decades,” Admits Former Police Chief

The systematic abuse of young white girls by Muslim sex grooming gangs has been going on for decades and police chiefs have been too scared to speak out for fear of being labelled racists, a former police chief has admitted.

In an interview with a daily newspaper, former detective superintendent Mick Gradwell said the “targeting of underage and vulnerable girls” by what he called “Asian” gangs (but are actually Muslim gangs) had “been going on for decades.”

Mr Gradwell said, “You have girls being abused and raped and yet the most senior officers are refusing to comment on it. On what other subject would you get that?”

Sounding like he was a British National Party spokesman, Mr Gradwell went on in the interview to ask, “How many young girls have been abused and raped because of the reluctance of the authorities to say exactly what is happening?”

The British National Party has warned of the problem since at least 2001, when members of the public brought it to Nick Griffin’s attention.

However, according to Mr Gradwell, the abuse has been going on for a while before that but has been covered up due to the terror inflicted by political correctness in Britain.

“When I joined in 1979 one of my first tasks was to police around a Blackburn nightclub where one of the issues was Asian men cruising around in BMWs and Mercs trying to pick up young drunken girls,” Mr Gradwell said in the interview.

“The main pressure police have is being called institutionally racist if they highlight a crime trend like this.

“There’s a fantastic reluctance to be absolutely straight because some people may take such offence.”

Mr Gradwell, who worked in the Lancashire Constabulary until 2009, said he knew that “police officers know what they're saying is true, but they're not coming out and saying it because you can't feel comfortable, because of allegations of institutional racism, that you can come out and say that a culture or a race is suspected of this sort of crime.”

The confession makes the scandal worse than even the British National Party first suggested.

It means that the practice had been embryonic in the 1970s, and had steadily grown in the two decades prior to when the British National Party first drew attention to the matter.

In other words, the Labour and Tory parties have the blood, suffering and misery of at least three decades of Muslim sex gang grooming on their hands.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

UK Conservative Party Holds Oldham Public Bye Election Meeting in Urdu Shock

Conservative Party Holds Public Meeting in Urdu in Oldham

 The British National Party Newsroom

The New Conservative Party has demonstrated its commitment to the Islamic colonisation of Britain by holding one of its Oldham election meetings in Urdu, rather than English.

 The Conservative Party in Oldham meets.The meeting, addressed by the Muslim Conservative Party chairman Sayeeda Warsi before a large crowd of Islamic supporters, featured repeated references to how that party was catering to the needs of the Muslim community.

Steps already taken by the Tory party include the formation of a special commission to study the “cause” of Islamaphobia in Britain, Ms Warsi, the first non-British chairman of that party, told the meeting to great applause.

The meeting, a video of which can be viewed below, was also addressed by the Conservative party candidate in Oldham, who goes by the unsurprising name of Kashif Ali.

Is this the Britain that traditional Conservative Party voters want? A land utterly colonised by Pakistan in which a non-British Tory party chairman has to speak in Urdu to an election meeting?

People watching the video might wonder if the meeting was being held in Britain at all, or rather in Pakistan.

Note also in the speech, how Ms Warsi makes frequent use of the words “Inshallah” which means “as Allah wills,” a perfect representation of the insane path to the Third World colonisation of Britain — to which the New Conservative Party is fully committed.

Winston Churchill would most certainly not recognise this party as his own.

According to records released by the National Archives in 2007, Sir Winston and his cabinet colleagues, concerned at the number of "coloured people", wanted to introduce strict immigration controls to prevent the takeover of this country.

In hand-written notebooks, the cabinet secretary, Sir Norman Brook, said that immigration restrictions were discussed at a cabinet meeting on 3 February 1954.

Sir Winston said that he would” [like] also to study possibility of 'quota' — [number] not to be exceeded."

Sir Winston said that “Problems wh. [which] will arise if many coloured people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in UK? Attracted by Welfare State. Public opinion in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits."

Florence Horsbrugh, the minister of education, added that the problem was becoming "serious" in Manchester.

David Maxwell-Fyfe, the home secretary, reported that the total of "coloured people" in Britain had risen from 7,000 before the Second World War to 40,000 at the time of writing, with 3,666 of those unemployed, and 1,870 on national assistance, or benefits.

He referred to those "living on immoral earnings". Of 62 people convicted the previous year in the Metropolitan police area, 24 were "coloured". He added: "All adminve. [administrative] measures to discourage have bn. [been] taken. Only further step wd. [would] be immigrn. [immigration] control over admn. [admission] of [British subjects] to UK.

Sir Winston said the question was whether it might be wise "to allow public feeling to develop a little more — before takg. [taking] action...May be wise to wait...But it wd. be fatal to let it develop too far."

As the video below clearly demonstrates, the situation has been left to develop “fatally too far” as Sir Winston warned.

Britain faces a few more short decades in which the Islamic colonisation of our country can be prevented. Conservative Party voters should take heed of Sir Winston’s warnings, and act accordingly.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Biased BBC Censors Oldham BNP Candidate on Politics Show as another Nine Muslim Groomers Arrested in Neighbouring Rochdale

Muslim Grooming Gangs: BBC Censors Derek Adams on Politics Show as another Nine Arrested in Neighbouring Rochdale

The British National Party Newsroom

Sunday’s edition of the BBC’s North West Politics Show deliberately cut short an interview with the British National Party’s candidate in the Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election, Derek Adams, after he began discussing Muslim sex grooming gangs in detail — one day before another nine offenders were arrested in neighbouring Rochdale for that crime.

Derek Adams

.Mr Adams was asked by the BBC reporter about the demonstration held by the party in Oldham town centre last Saturday and was just beginning to explain the detailed facts behind the Muslim grooming scandal and how the British National Party had been the first to bring it to the public’s attention.

The interview was being broadcast live when suddenly, without any warning at all, the BBC cut short Mr Adam’s interview. 

“It was obvious that they decided to censor what I had to say about the Muslim grooming scandal,” Mr Adams said.

“The interview was going fine until I raised the topic and then, wham, it ended with obscene haste.”

Mr Adams appealed for anyone who might have seen the show and taped it, to contact him on 07513470349. “I would like to get a copy of it, just for my own records,” Mr Adams said.

Meanwhile, the very next day, police arrested a further nine Muslims in neighbouring Rochdale on suspicion of organising yet another paedophile sex grooming gang.

According to a police statement, so far 14 girls have been identified as potential victims. They claim they were plied with drink and drugs and then taken to flats and houses for sex.

Police said the girls are all white and aged 13 to 15.

The investigation was launched by Rochdale police but has now been taken over by Greater Manchester Police’s Major Incident Team “because of the serious nature and potential volume of the offences.”

News of the arrests appears to have been deliberately held back, as has happened before in such cases.

According to the police, eight of the Muslims were arrested in December and a ninth was arrested last week. All have been released on bail until a new court appearance in March.

The latest arrests come just a week after the establishment was forced to admit that the British National Party had been right all along in pointing out that there was a Muslim sex grooming gang wave spreading out across the country.

“Unlike Jack Straw, who has tried to jump on the bandwagon and blame Pakistanis, the British National Party has maintained that this is a Muslim problem,” Mr Adams said.

“In Wrexham in North Wales, for example, there have been cases involving Iraqi asylum seekers, while in other parts of the country, incidents have involved Kurds and a myriad of other nationalities.

“The truth is that this attitude towards non-Muslim girls has its origins in the teachings of Islam, and not in a particular group.

“It is yet another example of why Islam is incompatible with modern Western society,” Mr Adams said.

“It is hypocritical in the extreme for Mr Straw to now attack Pakistanis for the problem, as it is for the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats to pretend to cry crocodile tears over the issue.

“All three of those parties have supported the policies of mass immigration and the colonisation of Britain by Third World immigrants, and they are all to blame,” Mr Adams said.

* Mr Adams has provided a full firsthand account of the disgraceful events in Oldham last Sunday which saw him ejected by police from an election hustings.

“The tickets for the venue specifically said ‘come and meet the candidates’ but I told them that they should rather have said ‘come and meet some of the candidates,’” Mr Adams said in the audio interview with Simon Darby.

“If this had happened in Russia or Iran, the BBC would have said that this was a scandal,” Mr Darby said. “Yet because it happened here, they just cover it up.”

Listen to the interview below.

Re-writing UK history to eliminate Nick griffins MEP stance against Islamic grooming

Re-writing history to eliminate MEPs stance against grooming

 JANUARY 2011:

FIRST there was the conspiracy of silence by the media and the authorities to hide the existence of the grooming for sex of young white girls by Muslim men.

Now the media is taking the cover-up one step further by re-writing history to eliminate the record of Nick Griffin and the British National Party's campaigning against this evil practice.

On Friday The Times, which put the grooming report on its front page having ignored the story since 2004, claimed that Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg was the only politician brave enough to tackle the issue. The report deliberately ignored Nick Griffin's seven year battle to publicise the issue.

We know it was deliberate because Times journalist Andrew Norfolk reported on the very case at Leeds Crown Court where Nick Griffin (right) was charged over remarks made when alerting British National Party meetings across the North of England about the growing threat to our young girls from Muslim men.

Now this morning, media outlets are carrying a new press release claiming it's Jack Straw that is leading the campaigning and the British National Party are just following his initiative, with the Business Recorder misinforming its readers:

". . . the far-right British National Party jumped on Straw's comments, saying it was launching a leaflet entitled "Our Children Are Not Halal Meat" in which it would "warn school kids of the threat from Muslim sex grooming gangs."

Thankfully, interested members of the public can find out all about the British National Party's seven year campaign with a click of a mouse as the history of Nick Griffin's stance against the might of the establishment in exposing the threat to our young girls is well documented on the Internet.

And many worried parents have done just that as the MEP's mailbag on issue bears witness to.

"It seems to be the issue that his constituents in the North West most associate Nick Griffin with," explained Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield.

"People write to Nick on the subject because they know that he will take their concerns seriously and take action. Time after time, people write in to say that their MP, and their MEPs from the old gang parties, have called them 'racist' because they are making accusations against Muslim men." 
originally Published http://boltonbnp.blogspot.com/