So We Ask What Was the Afghan War About? as MPs Call for Talks with Taliban

So What Was the War About? MPs Call for Talks with Taliban

  The British National Party Newsroom

The House of Commons cross-parliamentary foreign affairs committee has called for direct talks with the Taliban to end the war in Afghanistan, making their original decision to go to war ten years ago into little more than an evil farce.

The announcement by foreign affairs committee chairman and Conservative MP for Croydon South, Richard Ottaway, coincided with his party’s leader David Cameron endorsing the idea of talks with the Taliban during an press conference in London.

According to Mr Ottaway and his committee, more “US engagement in talks with the Taliban is needed to bring the conflict in Afghanistan to a close” because “political reconciliation in Afghanistan could be impeded by ongoing fighting with insurgents.”

What this means in plain English is that continuing to wage war against the Taliban is preventing it from entering direct negotiations — a statement of the obvious if ever there was one.

Apart from the idiocy of this comment (befitting though it is for the current Westminster parties), its more sinister aspect is that the admission that the only solution to the conflict is to “politically reconcile” with the Taliban, raises the obvious question: why did they go to war in the first place?

The conflict in Afghanistan has cost the British taxpayer billions of pounds, hundreds of British lives and has served to incite Muslims around the world into attacking UK interests.

In other words, the war has served no useful purpose at all. Indeed, it was directly against British interests to attack Afghanistan, both at home and abroad.

Yet this same cross-parliamentary group which has now called for talks with the Taliban to “end the conflict” enthusiastically supported the war in the first place. The war, promulgated by the previous Labour regime, was supported and encouraged by the Tories, while the Liberal Democrats have, through their coalition with the Conservatives, been brought on board the warmonger bus as well.

The foreign affairs committee’s comments coincided with a visit by Afghan president Hamid Karzai to Mr Cameron in Downing Street, during which the Prime Minister genially promised that even more British taxpayers’ money would be given in aid to Afghanistan.

According to press reports, Mr Cameron also appeared enthusiastic in a joint press conference held yesterday lunchtime for more dialogue with the Taliban.

“The military campaign is only part of the equation on an Afghan-led process for reconciliation and reintegration," he told reporters.

"It is time for the Taliban to start this journey and make this year a decisive year in Afghanistan."

That comment will no doubt not be well-received by the family of the Royal Army Veterinary Corps soldier who was killed in the latest incident in Helmand province just a day ago.

The fatality brings to 358 the number of British military personnel who have died while serving in Afghanistan since the start of operations there in 2001.

The families of the dead might well now be forgiven for asking what their bitter sacrifices were now all about, if the end game is to draw the Taliban back into a “reconciled government.”

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut Spending Review Nightmare Part III:

Spending Review Nightmare Part III: Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut

  The British National Party National Newsroom

Workers who commute by train on main routes with regulated fares face dramatic price increases because of the coalition government’s budget cuts, travel industry experts have warned.

The Tory/Lib Dem government has announced that it will be raising the ‘fee cap’ on routes with regulated fares to 3 percent above inflation in a bid to shift some of the cost of rail subsidies it provides onto the public — even though tax money is used to already subsidise the train companies.

The rise will hit conventional commuters the hardest, as the commuter runs are specifically those with regulated fares.

In addition, the budget cuts will “prove tough for workers in the public sector,” experts have warned.

Nigel Turner, director of programme management at travel company Carlson Wagonlit, was recently quoted in the Air and Business Travel News as warning that the budget cuts will prove a “major challenge” for the government.

He said that nobody in the public sector “has been quite sure what budget they have.

“There have been huge cutbacks already on travel, just through people not knowing what they are allowed to spend. In general, they have not been travelling.”

He said he was “hopeful” that the estimated one million job cuts, which are part of the cutbacks, would not affect the travel industry “too badly.”

It is not only the rail service which is going to cost the public more. Councils across the country have been told by Transport Minister Norman Baker that they should stop "bleating" for more funds to repair road networks.

Mr Baker, a Lib Dem MP for Lewes, admitted that the roads in his constituency were “not particularly brilliant” — an understatement considering that East Sussex County Council has an estimated backlog of 20,000 potholes to repair.

Nonetheless, Mr Baker and his colleagues have overseen a £1.5 reduction in the highways maintenance budget according to East Sussex County Council as part of the overall spending review budget cuts.

And so it goes on: While train fares rise, subsidies to train companies remain; and road maintenance budgets in Britain are cut, but the increased foreign aid budget contains millions allocated to road building in Africa.

Once again, British people are put last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite:Spending Review Nightmare Part II:British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part II: Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite

The British National National Newsroom

Coalition government Policing Minister Nick Herbert’s promise that the police’s front-line services would be protected after severe budgets cuts has been exposed as a lie with the news that yet another specialist unit that traces and recovers stolen cars is to be axed.

The Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (VCIS) has been highly successful in tracking down a significant number of the 150,000 cars stolen in Britain every year, but has been told its annual £300,000 grant has been cancelled.

This money is, of course, a mere fraction of what is spent on foreign aid each year, a large portion of which goes to helping establish ‘law and order’ in other countries.

In the past four years, the VCIS has recovered more than £48 million of stolen cars, arrested more than 200 thieves and reunited thousands of car owners with their property, according to a report in Police Review magazine.

The article went on to say that the 13 police officers and seven police staff who make up the unit, called its scrapping “short-sighted” and “unjust.”

According to the Automobile Association, the service was vital. “If you can take out a gang you can wipe out a crime wave for several months, so you need this specialist police activity,” an AA spokesman was quoted as saying.

In last October’s Spending Review, it was announced that the police funding would be cut incrementally until it totalled 20 percent by 2014-15.

At the time, Mr Herbert told parliament that “front-line services could be protected while achieving challenging savings.”

This was, of course, yet another lie. It is has since emerged that police forces up and down the country will have to cut at least 10,000 active officers and thousands more other staffers will also have to be fired.

Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, warned last year that police savings in back office costs and procurement would not be enough to absorb the cuts, as Mr Herbert has claimed.

“Police numbers will almost certainly have to fall once budget cuts start to bite,” Sir Hugh said.

Central funding to the police budget will fall to £9.3 billion in 2011-12, and to £8.8 billon the year after.

Compared to the billions spent on European Union membership, this figure is trifling, but, as always, the Westminster parties always put the interests of British people last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises, British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part I: NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises

The British National Party National Newsroom  

In yet another example of how Britain was conned by David Cameron’s promise not to cut back on the National Health Service, the East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has just announced that at least 1,000 hospital jobs, including those of doctors and nurses, are to end.

The cutbacks are a direct response to the coalition government’s Spending Review, which did not cut funding to the NHS but lowered its annual increase to 0.1 percent above inflation.

This is well under annual operating cost increases, many of which (such as the ‘carbon tax’ on emissions and the increased petrol price) are the direct result of government-imposed surcharges.

The East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has confirmed to a local newspaper that 200 posts a year will go between now and 2015, a figure which will total a fifth of their total workforce.

According to reports, positions “facing the axe will be 257 jobs from the administration and estates department, 226 from the nursing division, 126 from therapy and diagnostics, 47 doctors, 205 clinical support staff and 13 managers.”

The Trust’s director of human resources and organisational development, Mr Ian Brandwood, admitted to a local newspaper that “some” front-line doctors’ and nurses’ posts would go.

The announcement confirmed the accuracy of the earlier report this week by anti-cuts activist organisation, False Economy, which specifically said that the East Lancashire NHS Trust would soon get right of 1,013 full-time equivalent staff, 50 doctors and dental staff, and 270 nurses, midwives and health visitors.

The budget restrictions will impact more than 50,000 hospital posts nationwide as NHS Trusts struggle to meet the government’s demand of £20 billion of “efficiency savings” over the next five years.

The “savings” mean that the NHS has to trim £4 billion off its expenses each year — a figure which is less than the annual estimated £4.5 billion spent each year fighting the war in Afghanistan.

Once again, the Westminster parties clearly think that fighting an unwinnable war which causes terrorism, is more important that funding healthcare for British people.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Foreign Aid Costs £479 for every household in Britain. As Tories Admit that British National Party Was Right All Along

Foreign Aid: Tories to Admit that British National Party Was Right All Along

The British National Party Newsroom

A leaked draft copy of the government’s foreign aid spending review, has all but admitted that the British National Party has been correct on the topic — but still insists on increasing the amount of British money handed out to the Third World.

The document, leaked to the BBC ahead of this week’s spending review to be announced in parliament, apparently states that British foreign aid handouts are to be stopped to at least 16 countries, including Russia, China and Iraq.

In addition, aid to India will be “frozen,” whatever that might mean.

The dramatic turnaround comes after months of sustained pressure from the British National Party on the subject, which finally forced the issue to the forefront of politics after having been deliberately hidden for decades.

Although this move is a major concession to growing popular opinion on the topic — and an understanding that it is the British National Party which is responsible for it coming to the public’s attention — the manoeuvre does not in fact reduce the foreign aid spend.

Instead, the spending review merely redeploys the billions in the budget, and, to add insult to injury, will increase the total amount spent.

According to the document, the international development budget will rise by a third because “aid spending is good for Britain's economy and safety.”

This blatant Tory lie — that it is “good” for the economy — is exposed by the simple fact that the foreign aid budget is twice as much as the total cutbacks on university spending, which is set to cripple higher education in Britain.

In addition, the document apparently says, by 2014, some 30 percent of British foreign aid is to go to “war-torn and unstable countries.”

Afghanistan will continue to be a major aid recipient, being “war-torn.”

Of course, the only reason why it is in that condition was because the Labour/Tory elite waged war on that nation in the first place.

The Department for International Development’s budget for 2009/2010 was £7.8 billion,  but the total foreign spend in all sectors for that period was £8.4 billion.

This figure is set to rise to £12.6 billion per year by 2014, equal to £479 for every household in Britain.

Furthermore, at this rate, the total foreign aid spend over the next ten years will amount to £126 billion. This figure is a conservative estimate, as both Labour and Tories have promised to keep increasing the budget year-on-year.

The halting of aid to Russia, China, Iraq and India does not meet the demands of the British National Party on the subject, which is the complete halting of all foreign aid while there is need or want here at home.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

“Right Wing Support” Survey: Another Establishment Sleight of Hand, analyis By Nick Griffin MEP

“Right Wing Support” Survey: Another Establishment Sleight of Hand

  The British National Party National Newsroom

The newly-released “survey” which claims that 48 percent of British voters will support an anti-immigration party, is an Establishment sleight of hand which will backfire on its producers, Nick Griffin MEP has said.

Reacting to the release of the survey, which has been reproduced widely in the media, the British National Party leader said the report was a mixture of the obvious, the truth, a good deal of not-so-subtle propaganda and Establishment conniving.

“The reality is that no-one needs a new poll to become aware that there is deep dissatisfaction within society at the levels of immigration which, left unchecked, will plunge indigenous British people into minority status within a few decades,” Mr Griffin said.

“In that sense, the British National Party’s place in history, and destiny, is assured.

“We are the only party which has consistently warned about the dangers of unlimited mass immigration, and now the Establishment is slowly being forced to grudgingly concede that we were right, we are right and that all future trends are toward our political direction,” Mr Griffin said.

“There are however, contained in both the ‘report’ and the media coverage thereof, some important considerations.

“The first is that the media has tried to portray the report’s authors, the ‘Searchlight Educational Trust,’ as some sort of objective think thank devoted to ‘antiracism.’

 Searchlight founder Gerry Cable, guest of honour at Communist Party meeting in 2008.“In reality, as all informed journalists are already aware, Searchlight is nothing but an extremist Communist Party front organisation, whose founder actually stood as a formal Communist Party candidate and who as recently as 2008, was the guest speaker at a prominent Communist Party meeting in London.

“There is therefore, no question of ‘objectivity’ in anything Searchlight produces,” Mr Griffin said.

“Furthermore, Searchlight was closely involved with the setting up of the ‘UAF’ organisation, whose leaders are all senior members of the Socialist Workers’ Party.

“In fact, the only reason why Searchlight eventually left the UAF was because the latter organisation filled up with Islamist radicals and became anti-Zionist.

 “Searchlight, whose founder is also a radical Zionist whose son served in the Israeli army, objected to the anti-Israeli stance, and, complaining about anti-Semitism, left the UAF in a huff.

 “The Zionist nature of Searchlight offers another key in understanding the prominence given to the new ‘survey’ by the media.

 “Searchlight commissioned polling agency Populus to carry out the survey upon which the 48 percent figure is based.

 “It is no coincidence that the founder of Populus and that organisation’s Strategic Director, Andrew Cooper, has recently been appointed Director of Political Strategy at 10 Downing Street, working directly to David Cameron,” Mr Griffin continued.

 “All political observers have seen how influential Zionists, both Jewish and Christian alike, have identified radical Islam as a threat to Israel’s support base in western European nations, and have jumped on the anti-Islam bandwagon for their own purposes.

 “Thus it is in their interests to boost populist anti-Islamist organisations such as the English Defence League as a means of pressuring the rest of the political Establishment to do something about the problem.

“This development is becoming more and more blatant, with recent weeks having seen not only the Daily Star but also BBC’s Newsnight shamelessly promoting the EDL.

 “It can be seen in the ‘new’ survey that accent is given to what is described as ‘assertive English nationalism’ and the call for an English parliament as being key ingredients to the electoral possibility of a ‘new’ right wing political party.

“The British National Party does indeed believe that the creation of an English Parliament is necessary to stop the unfairness of the present devolved governmental system leading to a total break-up of the United Kingdom, but the fact that the EDP were beaten by the Monster Raving Looney Party in the Oldham by-election shows that this policy, in itself, is politically insignificant.

 “Obviously, however, the report’s authors hope that by stressing the ‘English’ angle in this way they can encourage organisations such as the EDL to resort to electoral politics, all with the obvious intention of sidelining the British National Party,” Mr Griffin said.

 “While the British National Party is obviously different from the EDL, and would not welcome a party emerging from that organisation, we are quite happy to let the Establishment proceed with its plans.

 “We are safe in the knowledge that all British people who have commonsense and political depth know, or will see very quickly, that the only avenue for real political power lies with the British National Party.

“Perhaps more significant still, the powerful people at present trying to boost and manipulate the EDL are playing with fire.

“In addition to politicising a whole generation of English working class youth (as the middle class would-be thugs of the UAF are already discovering to their discomfort), the whole operation has the potential to spark public disorder and communal violence on a scale never before seen on the British mainland.

“It is a massive and dangerous gamble for the media bosses now plugging the EDL to hope that this can be controlled and provide a safety valve to stop more people turning to us. It’s far more likely to blow up in their faces.

 “All-in-all, this new survey – and the bigger picture of manipulation behind it – only confirms what we know, namely that history is moving in our direction, and that no matter which way the Establishment tries to spin it, the end result will only be in favour of our party, and not against it.

 “This latest scheme will backfire against its producers and we will be the long-term winners,” Mr Griffin concluded.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Another Election Promise Smashed: Budget Constraints Mean NHS Job Losses Will Total 53,000

  The British National Party Newsroom

Budget constraints introduced by the Tory/Lib-Dem alliance will see the National Health Service will lose more than 50,000 jobs, activist group “False Economy” has announced.

 Original Conservative Party election poster, 2010.The organisation, which campaigns against budget cuts, said that its studies show that 53,000 NHS staff will lose their jobs in NHS Trusts across the country over the next five years. 

The figure is double previous estimates and reveals precisely how much the ruling regime’s budgetary contortions will cost the British public.

Although it was promised that spending on the NHS would not be cut, the real time increase is around 0.1 percent year, which is way below operating cost increases.

This disparity will inevitably lead to a lowering in NHS service levels as trusts will be forced to make major job cuts to reduce operating expenditure.

Contrary to ConDem denials, a number of doctors and nurses across all trusts will be among those affected.

The data was released after False Economy submitted a large number of Freedom of Information requests, which are available online here.

The figures from False Economy are double those forecast by the Royal College of Nursing forecast last November.

One of the biggest culls they uncover will be at Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, where 1,755 full-time posts will be cut, including 120 doctors and dentists, and 620 nurses.

Overall a minority of jobs are expected to be lost from ‘natural wastage’, but False Economy believes the majority of losses stem from the health service’s need to meet the so-called Nicholson Challenge which requires the NHS to make around £20 billion in efficiency savings by 2015.

During the 2010 election campaign, the Conservative Party promised in election posters and in its manifesto that it would not introduce any policy which would harm the NHS.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Welcome to fascist Britain, Salford BNP organizer is Unjustly sacked for his political affiliations

Gary Tumulty, Salford BNP organizer is sacked for his political affiliations

Today it has come to my attention that Gary Tumulty has been sacked by Spar (he worked in Spar city tower in Manchester city centre) because he is the Salford organizer for the British National Party.
This is a message that I received from one of Mr Tumulty’ friends and I want to bring it to the attention of nationalists.

Gary Tumulty is the Salford Organiser, he worked for a company called MITTIE as a security guard and did a great job, recently he was confronted by a few UAF from the local MAFA, then a few weeks later he was mobbed at his workplace by about 60 MAFA chanting and shouting the usual rubbish, he was then suspended until a investigation was held resulting in him being sacked today. This is unfair and unjust.

Here is the link to the antifascists’ demo.
Pyongyangcitysessions Judge for yourselves the significance of using Pyongyang as part of a blogsite name.
So far I’m unable to give more information, except that Pat Harrington has been informed and he will I am sure assist Mr Tumulty in his claim for unfair dismissal.
I will give an update as soon as I have more news.
Welcome to fascist Britain, a carbon copy of 1930′s Italy.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS at http://www.londonpatriot.org/

Immigration fears of our young Almost three-quarters say it's a problem British National Party Chairmans Update

Fellow Patriot,
Did you see the great poll news the other day? Young people are waking up! The number of 16-24 year-olds who say that immigration is a big problem has risen form 60% to 70% in just twelve months.
Despite years of brainwashing in schools and on TV, more youngsters than ever before are seeing through the lies and spin of the Political Class.
For the first time, people in the 16-24 age group are now more worried about immigrant numbers than those in their 30s, the MORI poll showed. Mind you, opinion in that age bracket is also very much on our side - 68% of 25-39 year olds now say immigration is a big problem.
I believe that the poll shows that young people are now more receptive to our message on immigration than ever before.

The economic crisis means that there will be increased competition for jobs and public services.
Last week it was revealed 965,000 young people are out of work and hundreds of thousands have never worked. One in five 16-24 year-olds is jobless and looking for work. As the banksters' bust and ConDem cuts hit home, even more people are going to realise that we've been right all along.
Am I the only one who thinks this?
Well, No I'm not. Our far-left opponents say:
"With unemployment likely to hit two million by the end of the year and house prices dropping 15% in the past 12 months, most people are feeling the pinch. The government’s response to the credit crunch might have boosted its poll ratings in the short term but it could be the far-right BNP that benefits when the recession really bites."
A leaked Home Office memo has said that “Increased public hostility to migrants” was predicted to result from heightened competition for employment.

It's really no surprise then that there has been a concerted campaign to disrupt and smear the British National Party.
Put simply they don't want us around because they believe we are entering a period of opportunity.
Sadly for them, we have weathered their storm and I have gathered round me a central team of dedicated, highly motivated and talented Nationalists.
We’re working flat out to revamp our Publicity Department and totally overhaul our Elections machine. I’m criss-crossing the country speaking at meetings and organising for the future. I’m determined that we’ll be ready when the stormclouds really break.
Yes, they’ve underestimated us. More importantly they underestimated you. Our enemy believed that you would not renew your membership, join or donate if they attacked and smeared us.
Having no loyalty themselves they don't understand loyalty in others. They don't understand how much you care about our country.
Through thick and thin ordinary, decent people like you have backed the British National Party. Renewals, donations and new memberships have floooded-in. Subscriptions to our new, improved Voice of Freedom newspaper are at an all-time high. As a result the British National Party is back in the fight - stronger than before.
As we enter this time of opportunity we must up our output of literature and our activism on the streets. To do this we need your help.
Please donate today and give us the tools to do the job.

Please accept my sincere thanks,
Nick Griffin
Member of the European Parliament

P.S. Our time of opportunity is coming. We need your help. You can donate online or by ringing 0844 8094582. Remember, if our operators are busy, please call back!

Subscribe to the Voice of Freedom for the truth in the British News

Subscribe to the Voice of Freedom

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The Voice of Freedom (VoF) is the monthly newspaper of the British National Party. It is packed with hidden and censored news that the mainstream media refuses to print.

By subscribing to Voice of Freedom you will gain information and knowledge that others don't have.

The Voice of Freedom is not censored by the Political Class and brings you all the facts.

Our next issue is about to go to press. It is full of news suppressed by the daily press.

Articles in our next issue include:

The Great Pretender, Cameron's phoney war against multi-culturalism comes unstuck He who pays the piper - an expose of Tory funding Reports from the European Parliament Make sure you get the next issue hot off the press by  subscribing today. The Voice of Freedom is not to be missed. A full year's subscription is only £13.15, postage and packaging included. Subscribing to Voice of Freedom will make you better informed about matters in the news as well as key developments within the British National Party. Stay informed and support our alternative  Nationalist press with the Voice of Freedom. Subscribe today: - Click Here to Subscribe to The  Voice of Freedom With sincere thanks, Nick Griffin, MEP Member of the European Parliament Leader, British National Party

War against being Normal Continues Unabated the Christians View

The war against being normal continues unabated as desperate and radical homosexuals and “sex educators” attempt, often aggressively, to stage-direct the opinion-forming media - and the thoughts of society thereby - often in a way to exclude Christian and absolute moral views, and values, from our society. “If we cannot corrupt you” they seem to say “we will corrupt your children”.

It is a delayed-fuse takeover of civil society by all means - usually more foul than fair; and always to an evil end. One of the ultimate objectives is, I believe,  the re-introduction of the ancient sin of child sex abuse, or pederasty, especially for the benefit of some of the male homosexual elite who have a taste for it; possibly of the Labour party but with a few Tories, Liberal Democrats and Greens thrown in. The ancient elites of the Greeks, Romans, and Persians were infamous for this form of child sex abuse and the whole aim of the “Homophobic Hate Screen,” that some radical homosexuals are frantically throwing-up, is to try to shield this movement from exposure to the public and the wrath that might bring, from mothers as well as fathers, if they suss out what is really going on. The BBC, it seems,  is not interested in child protection, or the human rights of children, where this is concerned, any more than it is over cases of Muslim paedophile gangs. The morally relativistic elite have a clear agenda of hate, themselves, against all things that are normal and moral; and it seems that they do not care what they do to get it, or how truculent they may, at times, appear.

The Coalition Government, following New Labour, is proposing to teach disgusting homosex to primary school children!  This really is a tell-tale sign of what is being planned for our children.  What is the point of teaching homosex to primary kids unless one has an ultimate, not necessarily immediate, pederastic intent with little boys? What possible other reason could there be, long term? Even the normal sex lessons that I have supervised for secondary schools are done in such a way as to sexualise and corrupt, not educate, the youth: the ill-effects, there, tending to be both immediate and long-term. A lot of “sex education”  is plain “promiscuity-propaganda” and “obscenity-promotion” under a fake “respectability guise” or a fake “need to cut teenage pregnancy guise”;  and its known intent and effect is to corrupt the children and the pupil-teacher, adult-child relationship. At 13, 14, and 15  the children and young people  are talking about things that they should not know about, and they can do so in the most disgusting and depraved way that would shock and offend any reasonable adult or parent. And they learn to experiment and practise what they have seen and been taught to think and talk about.  If the parents knew what was going in their name, in the schools, there might be violence as a result.

One of my pupils was pregnant at 13.  I asked her what happened to “..it..”, the baby.  She said, now aged 14, “They came and took it away”.  I could have broken down at that point.  The moral relativism that dominates officialdom is a pestilence, and not an enlightenment.  How dare they talk of  Hate Crime when they are perpetrating it against the helpless.  The aim seems to be to destroy our children and any sense of normalcy and morality they may still have.  And they try to pulverise any who oppose this with their Orwellian sounding programme to “promote equality and diversity” which is nothing more than the “promotion of iniquity and depravity”.   If we stand back from the canvass, so to speak, the Coalition government intend to promote homosexuality in primary schools to little boys as being normal (ugh…why?); they intend to promote civil partnerships of “two daddies” as normal, and such inverts having adoption rights for children as normal (ugh…why?); and if all sexual proclivities are equal (equality and diversity?) then why not, ultimately, with children - especially if some elite homosexuals have a penchant for it.  Disgusting, I know, but we have to examine the facts; and we need to be aware of them.

Patrick Strudwick, himself a radical homosexual activist and writer, is an example of the kind of aggressiveness that comes over, from the general homosexual quarter, that is, against people who stand in the way, however inoffensively, of the radical sodomising agenda.  He recently targeted Lesley Pilkington to seek advice on how to give up what he implied was his own sexual deviancy and disorientation; something that had apparently imprisoned him and that he did not really want to be captive to any longer. Fair dos, you may think, except that he was not being honest and straightforward about any of this. It seems that he was seeking to entrap a Christian professional simply because she was a Christian - a clear case of bigotry, belief discrimination and prejudice - from homosexuals, not against them. Mr Patrick Strudwick agreed to meet Lesley Pilkington but in the context, only, of a Christian moral framework, which, as we all know, condemns homosexual disorientation as being “…of the nature of sin…”, and the deeds of buggery and sodomy as being “unnatural” and an  “…abomination…”. He had two sessions of counselling with her - which he secretly recorded - in which he told her that he “wanted to change.” But later he lodged a complaint to the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) and alleged that Lesley Pilkington had tried to “…force…” her beliefs on him when he had actually approached her and agreed to the terms of the counselling sessions as being in a Christian context only. How helpless the instigator now postured himself to be; playing the “I’m a helpless homosexual card.” How persecuted he is - he deceptively wanted us to think - by a woman he had actually targeted and undoubtedly misled. When he published, through the Independent newspaper, an article having a go at Lesley Pilkington, he subsequently received a “Journalist of the Year Award” from the sexual deviancy group, Stonewall. This all suggests some kind of set-up. It seems that radical homosexuals are rather good at that, they think.

So are radical homosexuals doing themselves any honour? Are they doing anything other than being utterly dishonourable? Are they the ones with the pugnacious spirit, sizing everyone else up for a fight? Are they the ones with the irrational hatred and phobia, and obsessive dislike of anyone who cannot see things the bent or twisted way they do? Their personal mores seem, from this case, to be as distorted and unnatural as their sexual mores - but then I represent the normal and moral majority. “No Mr Strudwick, homosexuality is not normal. Get it? You have even admitted it to others, however dishonestly, yourself!” Shortly before Lesley Pilkington’s hearing, the BACP required all witness statements to be passed to them with contact details. Immediately after supplying the statements, an expert witness for Lesley Pilkington received several menacing phone calls, threats and intimidation, telling them not to attend. As a result the police were informed and the BACP had to adjourn the hearing. We await further news from the sodomite rights groups about how they feel they have the right to behave in this way, and how they feel that everyone else has got to fall in with their threats, intimidation, and sexual perversions.

I wonder what the mothers and fathers will do when they find out that all this is not unconnected to teaching little children, as young as 5, 6, or 7, about sodomy and buggery in their class lessons at primary school and how it is “normal” for someone to have “two dads”? Childhood is supposed to be a time of innocence. These monsters will not have it so, if they get their way. Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ said:  “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in Me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea”. (Matthew 18: 6, Authorised Version).  This is the judgement of God, not the intimidation of man.   Do you understand that, Mr Strudwick?  Where do you  and your prize-givers stand on the promotion of such perversion, especially  in primary schools?

May I ask David Cameron and Nick Clegg what they intend to do about the new pederasty-tending campaign in primary schools which is being shielded and defended under the pretence, cover and screen of “Sex Education“ and “Stopping Homophobic Hate”? It is the getting at our children in schools which will cause justified anger, concern and contempt! Is this homophobic hate, Mr Strudwick? Or is it child protection and the right to be normal, not bent? We all have life choices to make when we are adults. You have clearly made yours but we do not have to follow you or approve of you and what you do, and - as for the radical homosexual agenda for our children - it is time for the cohorts of radical homosexuals to leave primary children alone! Would you not agree with that Mr Strudwick? Adult obsessions and phobias should be left for adults and not be imposed through schools upon other peoples’ children or any children, at all, for that matter!

The belief that homosexual disorientation is normal does, logically, lead on to the view that other forms of sexual deviancy and inversion are normal - and that, ultimately, and sooner than many of us think - leads on to the issue of child protection and care.  It is vital to shield our children from all child abuse and perversion and to ensure that they do have a childhood.  Likewise it is important for homosexual activists, like Mr Strudwick, to recognise the need to respect Christian views and values, and those who hold them: they are the only life-line, any of us have, to repentance from sin and salvation through our only Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.  There may well come a day when Mr Strudwick, and others,  may wish to avail themselves of that life-line; and it is only right that they should ensure that they have the opportunity to do so by currently respecting those commands of the gospel, to saving faith and repentance, to be heard by all, even if, especially if, they expose our sin and condemnation.

Yours in Christ, 
The Revd Robert West 
Christian Council of Britain.http://christiancouncilofbritain.co.uk/

The Christian Council of Britain holds to the Holy Bible which teaches that buggery and sodomy are an unnatural lust and an abomination, a sign of God’s wrath upon the ungodly, as well as bringing God’s wrath upon them. However we also know, and acknowledge, that where Satan is at work to bind men to destruction, God-in-Christ is also at work to redeem them from sin, Satan, hell and the power of the grave. Though therapy may be useful, it is the gospel of Christ itself which is the alone power of God unto salvation (Romans 1: 16) and that all who put their trust in the Son of God will be saved from both the power and the penalty of their sins.
 

Yes, Says The British National Party ! The Immigration Problem can be Solved?

Can The Immigration Problem be Solved? Yes, Says The British National Party

The British National Party Newsroom

The immigration invasion which has been highlighted once aga in by the new Migrationwatch report on how the Labour regime deliberately flooded Britain, has begged the question: Is the problem now so pervasive that it cannot be solved?

According to the Migrationwatch report, titled Immigration, Labour’s enduring legacy to Britain, more than three million people entered Britain under Labour’s tenure while more than a million British people left the country.

In addition, at least another one million illegal immigrants arrived and stayed in Britain.

According to a press release issued by Migrationwatch, the key points of their report are as following:

- Nearly a migrant a minute now arrives in Britain.

- Of the 3.2 million immigrants who have come to the UK some 80 percent came from outside the EU.

- The UK population is heading for 70 million in twenty years time and 68 percent of the increase will be due to immigration.

- Since 1997, some 75 percent of the extra jobs created went to foreign born workers.

- Over one third of new households will be a result of immigration, requiring 330 new homes every working day for the next 23 years.

- Waiting lists for social housing in England have risen by 70 percent since 2001.

- Children born to a foreign mother almost doubled to 25 percent.

- An extra 500,000 children arrived in our primary schools and a similar number do not have English as their first language.

- The number of migrants has increased under Labour’s new Points Based System. In 2009, economic migration fell by 27,000, helped by a major recession, but students increased by 43,000.

- Research by one of the country’s leading demographers has concluded that if immigration continues at its present level, the white British group will become an outright minority in the UK by the late 2060s.

“This has been a clear failure of democracy due in large part to the left’s deliberate tactic of stifling reasoned debate with accusations of racism,” said Sir Andrew Green in a statement.

He added that the raw statistics were difficult to envisage.

“But when you consider that three million extra people on this island equates to the creation of three cities the size of Birmingham, seven the size of Manchester or 20 the size of Harrogate with all that that means for the pressure on our roads, railways, housing, infrastructure, the environment, schools, hospitals and the general quality of life it gives some idea of the scale of what Labour has bequeathed to us all.”

The figures are shocking, except of course, to readers of this website who will have read all the statistics as they appeared.

As shocking as they are, the list of statistics raises the obvious question: is it not too late or too far gone to be remedied?

The British National Party argues firmly that it is not.

It is the party’s openly declared aim to restore Britain’s demographic balance to where the indigenous population remains the majority population.

This means adopting a series of measures designed to halt, and reverse, the immigration invasion and its resultant ethnic extermination of the British people.

The first step that is necessary is a complete halt on further immigration. No caps, quotas, “free trade deals” and other tricks employed by the Tories to hide the fact that their immigration policies are identical to Labour.

The second step is to use the full resources of the state to identify, track down and deport all illegal immigrants. This is a task which can easily be accomplished, particularly when our army is withdrawn from the pointless and illegal overseas conflicts.

The third step is to halt all the outrageous benefits and ‘human rights’ laws which encourages the illegal immigration flood and which fuels the ongoing ‘asylum’ racket.

The fourth step is to revoke all the utterly bogus asylum seeker processes and applications of the last 20 years or more, based on the undeniable fact that all of them are false.

Asylum seekers have the right to seek asylum in the first safe country bordering the one they are fleeing. They do not have the right to cross dozens of safe countries to reach Britain.

There are in fact, no, zero, none, legal asylum seekers in Britain.

The total number of asylum seekers totals in the hundreds of thousands, and all of them can be returned to either their home countries or the first safe one closest to those nations.

The fifth step is to institute the already legally constituted voluntary repatriation programme and encourage all the immigrants who claim to be so unhappy, so ‘discriminated against’ to return to their home nations.

Finally, the British National Party undertakes to do a complete re-evaluation of the entire demographic issue.

If it transpires that British people are still destined to become a minority in their own country, a British National Party government will reserve the right to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that Third World immigration never again threatens our very existence as a nation.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Pakistan Soon to Have More Nuclear Weapons than Britain: But Still British Foreign Aid Flows There

Pakistan Soon to Have More Nuclear Weapons than Britain: But Still Foreign Aid Flows

The British National Party newsroom

Pakistan is about to acquire a larger number of deployed nuclear warheads than Britain, just as British foreign aid will reach over a billion pounds within the next four years.

 One of Pakistan's nuclear missiles on display.According to reports, “American intelligence agencies” say that Pakistan now has 110 deployed nuclear weapons, an increase of 40 percent in just two years.

Britain has at most 160 deployed nuclear warheads, a figure which is set to decrease over the next few years.

The American estimate is based on the increased production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium in Pakistan.

During the 2008/2009 period, UK bilateral aid spending in Pakistan totalled £120 million, a figure which was increased in £140 million in 2009/2010 and which has just been boosted by a four year £665 million extra spend.

Mr Hague’s increased foreign aid spend includes £250 million for an “education programme” in Pakistan and £50 million “to support stabilisation and reconstruction in areas affected by conflict on border with Afghanistan.”

This boost comes at the same time that the education budget in Britain has been cut and spending has been increased on the continuing war in Afghanistan, caused by Mr Hague and his neocon fellow-travellers, which is the primary cause of the conflict on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border.

According to the Department for International Development (DFID) website’s page dealing with Pakistan, the “normal” UK bilateral aid spend in that country is made up of 33 percent humanitarian assistance; 20 percent governance; 18 percent education; 15 percent on growth; 8 percent on heath and 5 percent on “other.”

Pakistan’s defence budget is ranked 35th in the world, and is some £2.95 billion. Despite this, Pakistan begged for money to help cope with floods last year and to “educate” its own children.

It is not just British taxpayers who support Pakistan. Last year in October, American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the Obama administration had pledged $2 billion annually in military aid to Pakistan over five years “to help that country defeat violent extremism.”

This means that over the next four years, Pakistan will receive over a billion pounds from Britain and over £4 billion from America.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Look Out Bolton ! Latest “Big Society” Trick: Paving the Way for Mass Privatisation

Latest “Big Society” Trick: Paving the Way for Mass Privatisation

http://www.bnp.org.uk/

David Cameron has turned his “big society” trick into an excuse to justify the mass privatisation of almost all remaining public services such as the Royal Mail, schools and even local authorities.

In an article in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, Mr Cameron said that the transformation from a “big state” into a “big society” would mean that services could be transformed without the need for repeated legislation.

The only areas he identified as exempt from privatisation were the national security services (the police, intelligence services and army) and the judiciary.

These services were exempted only because not even they could possibly be made profitable in any sense of the word.

The pledge to create a “big society” has however now been revealed as nothing but an excuse to turn the rest of the civil service over to the profit-driven private sector.

The claim that privatisation was lead to a better service is exactly the same “reasoning” provided by previous Tory and Labour regimes when the railways and household utilities were handed over to the private sector.

Since then, without exception, service levels have declined and prices have increased.

In October last year, ConDem Business Secretary Vince Cable launched the Postal Services Bill which will privatise Royal Mail.

At the time, Mr Cable said that private buyers will be allowed to own up to 90 percent of Royal Mail, while the Post Office may be mutualised.

In addition, he made it clear that the government would not oppose a foreign company buying up the Royal Mail.

The Dutch Post Office was one of the first to be privatised, and is a yardstick by which all such undertakings are measured.

According to an earlier report, privatisation in Holland led to the closure of nearly 90 percent of the country's post offices.

In addition, complaints about the reliability of Holland's privatised post are widespread.

The Dutch Post Office was also one of the first to adopt EU directives and allow new companies to compete in its postal market, a move which was supposed to increase competition and lead to better services.

In reality, the complete opposite has occurred. New firms which pay far below the minimum wage have cherry-picked the most profitable routes, and have brought the Dutch Post Office’s finances to its knees.

There is no reason to think that the situation will be any different in Britain, and this is only the post office sector. It can only be speculated upon what will happen to schools and health services, to name but two.

But at least Mr Cameron has finally come clean with what he manes by the “big society.”

Previously, the naïve might have thought that he meant that everyone would have to somehow “work together” to make society better.

Now however, it is clear that what he actually intends is to sell the very last of the state assets in a privatised free-for-all which will make all previous privatisations seem like child’s play.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party  website Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Watch your Jobs Folks Economic Migration to Britain Set to Double under Secret ConDem Plan

Economic Migration to Britain Set to Double under Secret ConDem Plan

The British National Party Website

Economic migration to Britain is set to double under details of a secret ConDem plan to import Indian IT workers, the Migrationwatch organisation has revealed.

In a further expansion of the European Union’s “Free Trade Deal” with India, first revealed to the public by the British National Party’s MEP for the North West of England, Nick Griffin, Migrationwatch has detailed a number of “leaks” from Brussels on the agreement.

“Just as the Prime Minister is promising that ‘this year the government is determined to help deliver many thousands of new jobs,’ Vince Cable is secretly negotiating a deal that will admit tens of thousands of Indian workers to Britain,” Migrationwatch said in a statement.

“The deal is part of a Free Trade Agreement being negotiated between the EU and India which is expected to be signed this spring,” it continued.

“India is insisting on access for Indian workers as a condition of a wider agreement that would reduce tariffs on European products and lift some restrictions on businesses bidding for public procurement contracts.

“The proposed deal will allow Indian companies, which have obtained a service contract in Britain, to send over their own employees to do the work,” Migrationwatch said.

“This would cut out any opportunity for British workers and would also allow Indian companies to undercut British firms employing British workers by using cheaper migrant workers from India.

“According to leaks from Brussels, the EU Commission is planning to offer India up to 40,000 work permits a year of which the Indians are demanding that the UK share should be 20,000.

“Negotiations are believed to be continuing between the Commission and the British government.

“As this is part of a trade agreement, Cable’s Business Department is in the lead,” Migrationwatch pointed out.

“If the government cave in to Brussels the numbers admitted could double economic migration which the government have, after much debate, limited to 20,700 a year.

“These visas will be limited to 12 months in any 24 month period so that these workers are not here long enough to be officially classified as immigrants.

“There are even suggestions that ‘independent consultants’ should be allowed to come in under the same scheme. Significantly, the scheme would include the IT sector where British workers are already feeling the effects of immigrant Indian workers.

“The government already allow, at Cable’s insistence, an unrestricted flow of workers transferred between international companies for up to 12 months provided that they are paid £24,000 a year.

“These new arrangements would add further to that flow but, in this case, the arrangements would also be effectively irreversible because they would become part of a trade agreement that falls within ‘community competence.’

“The number of jobs in the economy is not fixed. Some new jobs might be created but this flow of cheap labour, however it is classified, is bound to affect the job prospects of British workers,” Migrationwatch continued.

“Furthermore, with no exit checks there is no way to ensure the departure of these workers at the end of their contracts. Those who stayed on would add to the net migration that the government has committed to reduce to tens of thousands.”

The Migrationwatch statement then quoted Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch UK, as saying that the “secrecy surrounding this deal has gone on long enough.

“Britain's 2.5 million unemployed have a right to know what is going on and to be told why the Prime Minister's pledges both to help create jobs and to cut back net immigration are being seriously undermined in this way.

“This scheme makes a nonsense of efforts to limit economic migration,” said Sir Andrew, who was previously a supporter of the Conservative Party government.

* The Migrationwatch statement ended with a reminder of David Cameron;s pledge to a meeting with business leaders on 10 January at which he said "This year the government is determined to help deliver many thousands of new jobs and I am delighted that the companies joining me today are part of that. Across a whole range of areas you are going to see the most pro-business, pro-growth, pro-jobs agenda ever unleashed by a government…by developing the right skills and jobs I am determined that the many not the few will share in the country's prosperity."

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the british National party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.