Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Search This Blog
FREEDOM NEWS HOME PAGE
Wednesday 8 October 2014
Tuesday 7 October 2014
Sunday 5 October 2014
Saturday 4 October 2014
Friday 3 October 2014
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Mediocrity and complete ass hole David Cameron raps to his favourite tune!
Post by Chris Smith.
Wednesday 1 October 2014
Monday 29 September 2014
Sunday 28 September 2014
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
By Alex Proud
Why aren’t the middle classes revolting?
Words you probably never thought you’d read in the Telegraph. Words which, as
a Gladstonian Liberal, I never thought I’d write. But seriously, why aren’t
we seeing scenes reminiscent of Paris in 1968? Moscow in 1917? Boston in
1773?
My current fury is occasioned the Phones4U
scandal (and it really is a scandal).
Phones4U was bought by the private equity house, BC Partners, in 2011 for
£200m. BC then borrowed £205m and, having saddled the company with vast
amounts of debt, paid themselves a dividend of £223m. Crippled by debt, the
company has now collapsed into administration.
The people who crippled it have walked away with nearly £20m million, while
5,600 people face losing their jobs. The taxman may also be stiffed on £90m
in unpaid VAT and PAYE. It’s like a version of 1987’s Wall Street on
steroids, the difference being that Gordon Gecko wins at the end and
everyone shrugs and says, “Well, it’s not ideal, but really we need guys
like him.”
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
There are two operant Crowns in England
There are two operant Crowns in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Tuesday 23 September 2014
Common Law a Easy Explanation
Common Law a Easy Explanation
The easiest way to explain the English common law system and answer all questions in simple terms is as follows: Common law is the LAW and is the only law recognized in a lawfully capacity in England and all sovereign nations of HRH Elisabeth ll of England. Common law today is like a family tree. common law is made up of statute's, a statute is a specific part of common law i.e murder, theft, fraud. Acts are rules that Parliament links to statute's of common law however not all "Acts" are lawful and any Act passed by Parliament that dose not relate back to to common law is only enforceable by submission by verbal or written contract/assentto the authority of the party that holds you accountable or liable. Common law however does change to include new but specific offences but these must always relate to common law by LAW. Credit cards were not invented when common law was written as the law of the land in the 11th century, however Credit card fraud is a crime under an Act, this act relates to a specific statute of common law (theft) and is there for a criminal offence. On the other hand there is an Act which says you must pay for a t.v licence if you own a device capable of receiving live television. this act is not lawful unless you submit to a verbal or written consent or submission of will to the claimant as this Act only relates to common law if you have entered a contract or agreement it then become enforceable by Common law. Common law only adapts to include offences and rights that can be related and interpreted by common law its self. So yes the acting authority can take children into crown care if they have reason to believe that his or her life may be in any kind of danger under common law as every individual has the the right to life. Under common law you also have the right to have any dispute including this and all of the above settled and judged by a court of law.
The easiest way to explain the English common law system and answer all questions in simple terms is as follows: Common law is the LAW and is the only law recognized in a lawfully capacity in England and all sovereign nations of HRH Elisabeth ll of England. Common law today is like a family tree. common law is made up of statute's, a statute is a specific part of common law i.e murder, theft, fraud. Acts are rules that Parliament links to statute's of common law however not all "Acts" are lawful and any Act passed by Parliament that dose not relate back to to common law is only enforceable by submission by verbal or written contract/assentto the authority of the party that holds you accountable or liable. Common law however does change to include new but specific offences but these must always relate to common law by LAW. Credit cards were not invented when common law was written as the law of the land in the 11th century, however Credit card fraud is a crime under an Act, this act relates to a specific statute of common law (theft) and is there for a criminal offence. On the other hand there is an Act which says you must pay for a t.v licence if you own a device capable of receiving live television. this act is not lawful unless you submit to a verbal or written consent or submission of will to the claimant as this Act only relates to common law if you have entered a contract or agreement it then become enforceable by Common law. Common law only adapts to include offences and rights that can be related and interpreted by common law its self. So yes the acting authority can take children into crown care if they have reason to believe that his or her life may be in any kind of danger under common law as every individual has the the right to life. Under common law you also have the right to have any dispute including this and all of the above settled and judged by a court of law.
Sunday 21 September 2014
Americans Please stop Making arses of themselves on the Scottish Vote
Trouble is with you yanks you think that every one in Scotland go,s
around with blue faces saying Och Aye the Noo! The vote was attempted to
be rigged by both sides , The SNP (yes) lowered the voting age, use
violence against the leader of the UKIP (Libertarian Party of UK) . The
question should have been should we divorce our selves from Westminster
and the Edinburgh political elite. , one and the same creature. What the
Scots were voting on was the Break up of the Union of the Kingdoms.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
Saturday 20 September 2014
Wednesday 17 September 2014
Tuesday 16 September 2014
Scottish independence requires full-hearted consent of the people - Roge...
That is exactly what Salmon and Camergoon want , the are in the same
camp. Salmon Like Camergoon is a collectivist and a TRAITOR of the
worst kind , both are in the pay of the bankers and there Zionist
controllers. If there is a yes vote Salmon will go to the EURO central
bank and accept any kind of loans of the Mickey mouse currency they
issue. Selling the Scots in to debt slavery for a millennium. He then
will accept terms to rejoin the EU accepting the EURO in the same manner
Greece did , with the same results. And then he will flood Scotland
with 3rd world immigrants in a manner that would make Blair look
amateurish. Leaving the Scots a Minority in there own land within 20
yrs. Mark my words !
The Scots and The Other Indigenous peoples of these isles have one
remaining chance and that is to remain united and to form a common
front against these New world order goons, Who are responsible through
the private central banks for the murders of billions of people over the
last 200 yrs
camp. Salmon Like Camergoon is a collectivist and a TRAITOR of the
worst kind , both are in the pay of the bankers and there Zionist
controllers. If there is a yes vote Salmon will go to the EURO central
bank and accept any kind of loans of the Mickey mouse currency they
issue. Selling the Scots in to debt slavery for a millennium. He then
will accept terms to rejoin the EU accepting the EURO in the same manner
Greece did , with the same results. And then he will flood Scotland
with 3rd world immigrants in a manner that would make Blair look
amateurish. Leaving the Scots a Minority in there own land within 20
yrs. Mark my words !
The Scots and The Other Indigenous peoples of these isles have one
remaining chance and that is to remain united and to form a common
front against these New world order goons, Who are responsible through
the private central banks for the murders of billions of people over the
last 200 yrs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)